-
Analysis of the Global Banking Network by Random Matrix
Theory
Ali Namakia,b,d, Jamshid Ardalankiac,d, Reza Raeia, Leila
Hedayatifard,e, Ali Hosseinyd,g, Emmanuel Havenf, G.Reza
Jafarid,g,h
aDepartment of Finance, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranbIran
Finance Association, Tehran, Iran
cDepartment of Financial Management, Shahid Beheshti University,
G.C., Evin, Tehran, 19839, IrandCenter for Complex Networks and
Social Datascience, Department of Physics, Shahid Beheshti
University, G.C., Evin, Tehran, 19839, Iran
eNew England Complex Systems Institute, NECSI HQ 277 Broadway,
Cambridge, MA — 02139, United StatesfFaculty of Business
Administration, Memorial University, St. John’s, Canada and IQSCS,
UK
gDepartment of Physics, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Evin,
Tehran, 19839, IranhDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central
European University, 1051 Budapest, Hungary
Abstract
Since 2008, the network analysis of financial systems is one of
the most important subjects in economics. In this paper, we
haveused the complexity approach and Random Matrix Theory (RMT) for
analyzing the global banking network. By applying thismethod on a
cross border lending network, it is shown that the network has been
denser and the connectivity between peripheralnodes and the central
section has risen. Also, by considering the collective behavior of
the system and comparing it with the shuffledone, we can see that
this network obtains a specific structure. By using the inverse
participation ratio concept, we can see that after2000, the
participation of different modes to the network has increased and
tends to the market mode of the system. Although noimportant change
in the total market share of trading occurs, through the passage of
time, the contribution of some countries inthe network structure
has increased. The technique proposed in the paper can be useful
for analyzing different types of interactionnetworks between
countries.
Keywords: Global Banking Network, Complex Systems, Random Matrix
Theory, Financial Contagion
1. Introduction
Since the recent global financial crisis, cross-border lend-ing
and financial contagions have gained importance. This im-portance
stems from the propagated effects [1, 2] of financialcrises on
political and economic situations [3, 4]. This fact hasprompted a
lot of research on the systemic dependence of theinternational
banking sector [5–11].
One of the most recent approaches for analyzing this situa-tion
comes from the notion of complexity [5, 12]. The purposeof
complexity science in finance focuses on the analysis of
thestructure and the dynamics of entangled systems. Many schol-ars
have applied complexity techniques for analyzing financialcontagion
[6, 9, 10, 13, 14]. Their findings suggested that con-nectivity of
financial institutions is the source of potential con-tagions.
Random Matrix Theory is one of the useful methods for ana-lyzing
the behavior of complex systems [12, 15–23]. This the-ory was
developed by researchers to describe the situation ofenergy levels
of quantum systems [24, 25].
The universality regime of the eigenvalue statistics is the
suc-cess factor of Random Matrix Theory [26–28]. Based on pre-vious
studies, it is shown that when the size of the matrix isvery large,
the eigenvalue distribution tends towards a specificdistribution
[28].
Email addresses: [email protected] (Ali Namaki),[email protected]
(Emmanuel Haven), [email protected] (G.Reza Jafari)
Random Matrix Theory has been applied to analyze the be-havior
of coupling matrices [12]. This technique divides thecontents of
the coupling matrix into noise and informationparts. The noise part
of the coupling matrix conforms to theRandom Matrix Theory findings
and the information part devi-ates from them. This concept stems
from the idea of solving theproblem of non-stationary cross
correlation and measurementnoise, as a result of market conditions
and the finite length oftime series [26, 28].
It is shown that the majority of their eigenvalues agree withthe
random matrix predictions, but the largest eigenvalue hasdeviations
from those estimations [22, 26, 27, 29]. In essence,this eigenvalue
develops an energy gap that separates it fromthe other eigenvalues
[17]. The largest eigenvalue is related toa strongly delocalized
eigenvector that presents the collectiveevolution of the system,
and this is called the market mode.From this perspective, the
largest eigenvalue’s magnitude re-flects the coupling strength of
the system [17].
One of the systems which can be analyzed by the complex-ity
approach, is the global banking network [30]. In this paper,by
applying Random Matrix Theory as a useful technique fromcomplexity
science, we want to analyze the global banking net-work.
Our paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we presentour
methods and, in section 3 we apply Random Matrix Theoryon the
global banking network and present our findings. Then,in section 4
we conclude.
Preprint submitted to Elsevier July 30, 2020
arX
iv:2
007.
1444
7v1
[q-
fin.
ST]
28
Jul 2
020
-
2. Methods
Primarily Random Matrix Theory has been presented bysome
scholars in nuclear physics such as Mehta [24, 25], foranalyzing
the energy levels of complex quantum systems. Sub-sequently, the
mentioned method helped to address specific is-sues in other
fields, such as finance [17, 26–28].
Based on the perception from random matrix theory,
theeigenvalues –in the real matrix– which deviate from the rangeof
the eigenvalues –in the random matrix– possess relativelymore
complete information from the system [23, 27, 28].
In Random Matrix Theory, there is a parameter named as
theInverse Participation Ratio IPR which is based on the theoryof
Anderson’s localization [31], and it computes the number
ofcomponents which significantly participate in each
eigenvector.This notion shows the effect of components of each
eigenvector,and specifically how the largest eigenvalues deviate
from thebulk region which is densely occupied by eigenvalues of
therandom matrix. Based on the previous papers [17, 32], IPR canbe
applied as an indicator for measuring the collective behaviorof the
networks. The formula of this concept is as follows:
IPR(k) =1∑n
l=1(ukl )
4; (1)
where l = 1, . . . , n and ukl is the lth element of kth
eigenvector
(lk). To further clarify the concept, one may consider
examplesbelow:
– In case all elements of a certain eigenvector are equal
to1√N
, IPR will be equal to N. This implies that whole elementsare
significantly influential on the systems’ behavior.
– On the other hand, if just a single element is equal to 1
andthe others are equal to 0, IPR would be equal to 1. This
im-plies that only this component is effective in the
correspondingeigenvector.
Hence, one can perceive that IPR clarifies the number of
in-fluential elements in a certain eigenvector.
3. Analysis of Global Banking Network by Random MatrixTheory
The banking industry is one of the most important sectors
infinance. In this regard, one of the significant aspects of
financialcontagion is the emergence and transmission of crisis
through-out the banking network. In Fig. 1, the evolution of the
globalbanking network in 5 snapshots (1978-Q3, 1988-Q3,
1998-Q3,2008-Q3 and 2018-Q3) has been depicted. The left panel
inFig. 1 shows the dendrogram structure of communities for trad-ing
weighted matrices. Also, the right column shows the evo-lution of
the network topology. As depicted, the network hasbeen denser over
time. Not only the contributions have risen,but also the peripheral
nodes are arranged closer and connectedto the central section.
In this study, we apply Random Matrix Theory for the dataof BIS
bilateral locational statistics provided by the Bank
forInternational Settlements (BIS) [33] from 1978 until 2019.
Thisdata includes all ‘core’ countries (the qualifier ‘core’ is
used by
GBR
DEU
BEL
JPN
CHE
ITA
NLD
ZAF
IRL
FIN
GRC
KOR
LUX
TWN
AUS
CHL
PHL
HKG
AUT
DNK
ESP
SWE
CAN
BRA
MEX FRA
USA
GBRLUXESPKORZAFPHLMEXITAHKGGRCFINTWNCHLCANBRAAUSAUTIRLDNKSWEJPNDEUNLDBELCHEFRAUSA
040008000120001600020000
Trading Volume
1978-Q3
AUS
AUT
BEL
BRA
CAN
CHL
TWN
DNK
FIN
FRA
DEU
GRC
HKG
IRL
ITA
JPN
LUX
MEX
NLDPHL
ZAF
KOR
ESP
SWE
CHEGBR
USA
JPN
LUX
CAN
BRA
MEX NLD
CHE
AUS
KOR
MAC CH
LTW
NPH
LIR
LFI
NGR
CZA
FES
PSW
EAU
TDN
KDE
UFR
ABE
LIT
AUS
AHK
GGB
R
GBRJPNUSADEUBELFRALUXESPKORZAFPHLMEXMACITAHKGGRCTWNCHLCANBRAAUSAUTSWEIRLDNKFINNLDCHE
020000400006000080000
Trading Volume
1988-Q3
AUS
AUT
BEL
BRA
CAN
CHL
TWN
DNK
FIN
FRA
DEU
GRC
HKG
IRL
ITA
JPN
LUXMAC
MEX
NLD
PHL
ZAF
KOR
ESP
SWE
CHE
GBR
USA
USA
GBR
DEU
HKG
BEL
LUX
AUT
DNK
GRC
FIN
ZAF
CHL
MAC
TWN
PHL
BRA
MEX AU
SKO
RES
PIR
LSW
ECA
NCH
EJP
N ITA
FRA
NLD
GBRJPNCHEUSAFRADEULUXIRLAUSFINESPKORZAFPHLMEXMACITAHKGGRCTWNCHLCANAUTBRADNKSWEBELNLD
04000080000120000160000200000
Trading Volume
1998-Q3
AUS
AUT
BEL
BRA
CAN
CHL
TWN
DNK
FIN
FRA
DEU
GRC
HKG
IRL
ITA
JPN
LUX
MAC
MEX
NLD
PHL
ZAF
KOR
ESP
SWE
CHE
GBR
USA
USA
GBR
JPN
CHE
BEL
CAN
GGY
JEY
AUT
SWE
AUS
HKG FIN
IMN
ZAF
CHL
TWN
MAC PH
LKO
RBR
AM
EXDN
KGR
CDE
ULU
XIT
AES
PFR
AIR
LNL
D
GBRJEYIRLNLDBELCHELUXCANAUSGGYAUTSWEDNKGRCIMNTWNFINMACCHLESPZAFPHLHKGITAKORBRAMEXJPNUSAFRADEU
0150000300000450000600000
Trading Volume
2008-Q3
AUS
AUT
BEL
BRA
CAN
CHL
TWN
DNK
FIN
FRA
DEU
GRC
GGY
HKG
IRL IMN
ITA
JPNJEY
LUX
MAC
MEX
NLD
PHL
ZAF
KOR
ESP
SWE
CHE
GBRUSA
USA
GBR
ITA
CAN
AUS
HKG
BEL
ESP
SWE
DNK
FIN
AUT
GGY
JEY
BRA
MEX
TWN
KOR
MAC GR
CCH
LZA
FIM
NPH
LLU
XNL
D IRL
CHE
JPN
FRA
DEU
CANHKGITALUXESPBELIRLSWETWNDNKFINAUTMACKORBRAMEXCHLPHLIMNGRCZAFAUSGGYJEYNLDCHEUSAFRADEUJPNGBR
0150000300000450000600000
Trading Volume
2018-Q3
AUS
AUT
BEL
BRA
CAN
CHL
TWN
DNK
FIN
FRA
DEU
GRC
GGY
HKGIRL
IMN
ITA
JPN
JEYLUX
MAC
MEX
NLD
PHL
ZAF
KOR
ESP
SWE
CHEGBR
USA
Figure 1: The evolution of global banking network is
demonstrated for the 5snapshots of 1978-Q3, 1988-Q3, 1998-Q3,
2008-Q3 and 2018-Q3. Left col-umn; shows the evolution of trading
matrices between countries. In order toextract the structure of
their communities, we have applied the dendrogramweighted matrices.
Right column; shows the evolution of network topology.
2
-
1978
-Q3
1980
-Q3
1982
-Q3
1984
-Q3
1986
-Q3
1988
-Q3
1990
-Q3
1992
-Q3
1994
-Q3
1996
-Q3
1998
-Q3
2000
-Q3
2002
-Q3
2004
-Q3
2006
-Q3
2008
-Q3
2010
-Q3
2012
-Q3
2014
-Q3
2016
-Q3
2018
-Q3
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
7000000maxshmax
1978
-Q3
1980
-Q3
1982
-Q3
1984
-Q3
1986
-Q3
1988
-Q3
1990
-Q3
1992
-Q3
1994
-Q3
1996
-Q3
1998
-Q3
2000
-Q3
2002
-Q3
2004
-Q3
2006
-Q3
2008
-Q3
2010
-Q3
2012
-Q3
2014
-Q3
2016
-Q3
2018
-Q3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Trilli
on U
SD
1e7 Total Quarterly Trading Volume
Figure 2: up) The evolution of the largest eigenvalue, λmax, of
the global bank-ing network and its shuffled, λshmax, are depicted.
down) The evolution of totaltrading volume is demonstrated.
many researchers such as [30], for 31 countries which
regularlyreport their financial data to BIS).
We create a weighted and directed financial transaction net-work
corresponding to each quarter from 1978 until 2019. Eachlink
corresponds to a loan given by a certain country to anotherone.
Previous studies specifically shed light onto countries’
de-pendency network and showed an increase in the
dependencystructure of the network of those countries during the
passageof time [30]. As already discussed, Random Matrix Theory is
apowerful approach for analyzing complex systems. In this pa-per we
apply this concept for the analysis of the global bankingnetwork as
a complex network. For this purpose, we choosethe shuffling
technique for the construction of a random ma-trix. The shuffling
method which is applied in this research israndomization of
bilateral trading volume (or links) in the net-work. It means that
the PDF remains unchanged and the bilat-eral trading relations will
be shuffled. The Shuffled matrix is anindication of no information
in the system.
The global banking network possesses an adjacency matrix.This
matrix can intrinsically be explained by the eigenvalue
de-composition methods [34]. The eigenvector corresponding tothe
largest eigenvalue, λmax, is the most significant and is the
1978
-Q3
1980
-Q3
1982
-Q3
1984
-Q3
1986
-Q3
1988
-Q3
1990
-Q3
1992
-Q3
1994
-Q3
1996
-Q3
1998
-Q3
2000
-Q3
2002
-Q3
2004
-Q3
2006
-Q3
2008
-Q3
2010
-Q3
2012
-Q3
2014
-Q3
2016
-Q3
2018
-Q3
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40 < IPR >IPR Max
Figure 3: It is depicted that overtime < IPR > has tended
to IPRλmax . It impliesthat the contribution of countries has
generally increased.
market mode of the network [17, 26, 27, 35].In this regard, we
assess the temporal behavior of the largest
eigenvalue, as shown in Fig. 2.By evaluating the behavior of
λmax and comparing it with the
λmax of the corresponding shuffled matrix in Fig. 2, one can
ob-serve the information content of the market mode. As depictedin
Fig. 2, the temporal behavior of the largest eigenvalue in
thebanking interaction matrix, is totally different from that of
thelargest eigenvalue in the shuffled matrix. This phenomenon
de-termines the existence of information content embedded in
thelargest eigenvalue of the banking interaction matrix.
When it comes to Fig. 2, the behavior of the maximum eigen-value
has been ascending. This issue – as stated before— hasbilateral
effects.
The reasoning behind this is that on the one side, it causesmore
strength and stability in the network, whilst on the otherside, it
yields to a more agile contagion throughout the net-work [7]. In
the post-crisis era after 2008, simultaneous to adecrease in the
maximum eigenvalue, the collective behavior ofthe system has
reduced and accordingly, local identities havebeen more
significant.
Since the so-obtained eigenvalue does not describe all
thedetails and properties of the collective behavior, one should
in-vestigate other quantities in the network.
It is observable that during the global financial crisis, a
struc-tural emergence with an increase in the difference between
λmaxand λshmax, Fig. 2, has occurred.
However, after the crisis, a significant decrease in the
behav-ior of the largest eigenvalue of the banking matrix relating
tothat of the shuffled matrix has emerged.
Based on the above concepts, one of the best approaches
foranalyzing the global banking network is the Random MatrixTheory
technique.
As already discussed, one should keep in mind that IPR
pos-sesses the ability of information extraction from the
collectivebehaviors of the systems.
In Fig. 3, By comparing < IPR > and IPRλmax , one is
ableto distinguish the temporal evolution of participation in the
net-
3
-
Figure 4: shows the % participation of each country in the
eigenvector – corresponding to the largest eigenvalue – versus
%(volume j
ΣNi Volumei.)
work.
In Fig. 3, we investigate the inverse participation ratio
(IPR)in a temporal process. In this context, by focusing on the
meaninverse participation ratio , < IPR >, and also, the
inverse par-ticipation ratio of the largest eigenvalue
corresponding to thelargest eigenvector , we investigate banking
behaviors of thecountries and their influences on the network
structure and themarket trend. In Fig. 3, IPRmean implies the
effectiveness of thebanking system of most countries on the global
network. How-ever, from the temporal behavior of IPRλmax , we
observe thatover time, less participation from those countries on
the largesteigenvector emerges.
In Fig. 4, %Participation stands for the contribution
per-centage of each country in the eigenvector corresponding to
thelargest eigenvalue. %Volume is the trading volume of a coun-try
divided by the total trading volume. Hence, %Participationshows the
contribution in the structure, and, %Volume showsthe contribution
in the total trading volume. Thereby, Fig. 4visualizes the
contributions in the structure versus the contribu-tion in trading
volume within each year. In 2018-Q3, for theUS, while the
percentage of contribution in the structure hasbeen approximately
constant, the percentage of contribution intrading volume
decreased.
4. Conclusion
In this paper, by applying Random Matrix Theory, the
globalbanking network is investigated. For this purpose, we
computethe matrix of interaction of banking sectors of BIS
countries,and then by using the Random Matrix Theory approach,
thebehavior of the largest eigenvalue and Inverse Participation
Ra-tio of this eigenvalue, as the market mode of the system
overtime, has been analyzed. The value of the largest eigenvalue
in-creases during the passage of time. By observing the behaviorof
trading volume, it is shown that these increases stem fromthe
expansion of the network to some extent. Also, by com-paring with
the shuffled one, we can deduce that the systemgets a specific
structure. Generally speaking, the global bank-ing network, today,
is more dense and interconnected. Also, wecan see that after the
year 2000 the value of the mean IPR hasdropped and converged to
IPRλmax . It means that more countrieshave become more influential
on the global banking network.Furthermore, despite small changes in
the share of total trad-ing volume, some countries such as the UK,
have become moreimportant in the network structure.
As a concluding remark, the identities of banking systemsof BIS
countries stems from two parts, i.e. i) from their ownidentities
individually and, ii) from their interactions in theglobal banking
network. As a suggestion for further work, onecan construct the
interaction matrices of the countries based onother variables such
as commercial interactions and so on.
4
-
References
[1] G. Iori, R. N. Mantegna, L. Marotta, S. Miccichè, J.
Porter, M. Tum-minello, Networked relationships in the e-MID
interbank market: A trad-ing model with memory, Journal of Economic
Dynamics and Control 50(2015) 98–116.
doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2014.08.016.
[2] A. G. Haldane, R. M. May, Systemic risk in banking
ecosystems, Nature469 (7330) (2011) 351–355.
doi:10.1038/nature09659.
[3] K. R. Carmen M. Reinhart, This Time Is Different: Eight
Centuries ofFinancial Folly, 1st Edition, Princeton University
Press, 2009.
[4] M. G. A. Contreras, G. Fagiolo, Propagation of economic
shocks in input-output networks: A cross-country analysis, Physical
Review E 90 (6).doi:10.1103/physreve.90.062812.
[5] A. S. E. B. e. Cont, Rama; Moussa, Network structure and
systemicrisk in banking systems, SSRN Electronic
Journaldoi:10.2139/ssrn.1733528.
[6] J. Etesami, A. Habibnia, N. Kiyavash, Econometric modeling
of systemicrisk: going beyond pairwise comparison and allowing for
nonlinearity,LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70769,
London Schoolof Economics and Political Science, LSE Library (Mar.
2017).URL https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/70769.html
[7] S. Battiston, D. D. Gatti, M. Gallegati, B. Greenwald, J. E.
Stiglitz, Li-aisons dangereuses: Increasing connectivity, risk
sharing, and systemicrisk, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
36 (8) (2012) 1121–1141. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2012.04.001.
[8] F. Betz, N. Hautsch, T. A. Peltonen, M. Schienle, Systemic
risk spilloversin the european banking and sovereign network,
Journal of Financial Sta-bility 25 (2016) 206–224.
doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2015.10.006.URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.10.006
[9] M. D’Errico, S. Battiston, T. Peltonen, M. Scheicher, How
does risk flowin the credit default swap market?, ECB Working Paper
2041 (2017).doi:10.2866/086521.
[10] S. Battiston, G. Caldarelli, Systemic risk in financial
networks, Journal ofFinancial Management, Markets and Institutions,
Rivista semestrale online (2/2013) (2013) 129–154.
doi:10.12831/75568.URL
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.12831/75568
[11] F. Atyabi, O. Buchel, L. Hedayatifar, Driver countries in
global bankingnetwork.
[12] G. Jafari, A. H. Shirazi, A. Namaki, R. Raei, Coupled time
series analysis:Methods and applications, Computing in Science
& Engineering 13 (6)(2011) 84–89.
doi:10.1109/mcse.2011.102.
[13] P. Glasserman, H. P. Young, Contagion in financial
networks, Journalof Economic Literature 54 (3) (2016) 779–831.
doi:10.1257/jel.20151228.
[14] M. Bardoscia, S. Battiston, F. Caccioli, G. Caldarelli,
Pathways towardsinstability in financial networks, Nature
Communications 8 (1). doi:10.1038/ncomms14416.
[15] M. POTTERS, J.-P. BOUCHAUD, Financial applications of
random ma-trix theory: a short review, arXiv preprint
arXiv:0910.1205.
[16] X. F. Jiang, T. T. Chen, B. Zheng, Structure of local
interactions incomplex financial dynamics, Scientific Reports 4
(1). doi:10.1038/srep05321.
[17] A. Namaki, A. Shirazi, R. Raei, G. Jafari, Network analysis
of a finan-cial market based on genuine correlation and threshold
method, PhysicaA: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 390
(21-22) (2011) 3835–3841. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.06.033.
[18] M. MacMahon, D. Garlaschelli, Community detection for
correlation ma-trices, Physical Review X 5 (2).
doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.021006.
[19] L. Sandoval, I. D. P. Franca, Correlation of financial
markets in timesof crisis, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications 391 (1-2)(2012) 187–208.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.07.023.
[20] A. H. Shirazi, G. R. Jafari, J. Davoudi, J. Peinke, M. R.
R. Tabar,M. Sahimi, Mapping stochastic processes onto complex
networks, Jour-nal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
2009 (07) (2009)P07046. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2009/07/p07046.
[21] J. Jurczyk, T. Rehberg, A. Eckrot, I. Morgenstern,
Measuring criticaltransitions in financial markets, Scientific
Reports 7 (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11854-1.
[22] J. Kwapień, S. Drożdż, Physical approach to complex
systems, PhysicsReports 515 (3-4) (2012) 115–226.
doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.007.
[23] A. Namaki, G. Jafari, R. Raei, Comparing the structure of
an emergingmarket with a mature one under global perturbation,
Physica A: StatisticalMechanics and its Applications 390 (17)
(2011) 3020–3025. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.04.004.
[24] M. L. MEHTA, Random Matrices, Elsevier, 1991.
doi:10.1016/c2009-0-22297-5.
[25] M. L. MEHTA, Preface to the third edition, in: Random
Matrices, Else-vier, 2004, pp. xiii–xiv.
doi:10.1016/s0079-8169(04)80088-6.
[26] V. Plerou, P. Gopikrishnan, B. Rosenow, L. A. N. Amaral, T.
Guhr, H. E.Stanley, Random matrix approach to cross correlations in
financial data,Physical Review E 65 (6).
doi:10.1103/physreve.65.066126.
[27] L. LALOUX, P. CIZEAU, M. POTTERS, J.-P. BOUCHAUD,
RANDOMMATRIX THEORY AND FINANCIAL CORRELATIONS,
InternationalJournal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 03 (03)
(2000) 391–397.doi:10.1142/s0219024900000255.
[28] A. NAMAKI, R. RAEI, G. R. JAFARI, COMPARING TEHRAN
STOCKEXCHANGE AS AN EMERGING MARKET WITH a MATUREMARKET BY RANDOM
MATRIX APPROACH, International Jour-nal of Modern Physics C 22 (04)
(2011) 371–383. doi:10.1142/s0129183111016300.
[29] G.-J. Wang, C. Xie, S. Chen, J.-J. Yang, M.-Y. Yang, Random
matrixtheory analysis of cross-correlations in the US stock market:
Evidencefrom pearson’s correlation coefficient and detrended
cross-correlation co-efficient, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications 392 (17)(2013) 3715–3730.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2013.04.027.
[30] J. A. Reyes, C. Minoiu, and, A network analysis of global
banking:1978-2009, IMF Working Papers 11 (74) (2011) 1.
doi:10.5089/9781455227051.001.
[31] G. Lim, S. Kim, J. Kim, P. Kim, Y. Kang, S. Park, I. Park,
S.-B. Park,K. Kim, Structure of a financial cross-correlation
matrix under attack,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications 388 (18) (2009)3851–3858.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.05.018.
[32] M. Saeedian, T. Jamali, M. Kamali, H. Bayani, T. Yasseri,
G. Jafari,Emergence of world-stock-market network, Physica A:
Statistical Me-chanics and its Applications 526 (2019) 120792.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.028.
[33] Bank for international settlements (bis).URL
https://stats.bis.org/
[34] P. Barucca, M. Kieburg, A. Ossipov, Eigenvalue and
eigenvector statisticsin time series analysis, arXiv preprint
arXiv:1904.05079.
[35] A. Utsugi, K. Ino, M. Oshikawa, Random matrix theory
analysis of crosscorrelations in financial markets, Physical Review
E 70 (2). doi:10.1103/physreve.70.026110.
5
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2014.08.016http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09659http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.90.062812http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1733528http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1733528https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/70769.htmlhttps://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/70769.htmlhttps://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/70769.htmlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2012.04.001https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.10.006https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.10.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.10.006https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.10.006http://dx.doi.org/10.2866/086521https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.12831/75568http://dx.doi.org/10.12831/75568https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.12831/75568http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2011.102http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151228http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151228http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14416http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14416http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05321http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep05321http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.06.033http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.5.021006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.07.023http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2009/07/p07046http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11854-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11854-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.04.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.04.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2009-0-22297-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2009-0-22297-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0079-8169(04)80088-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.65.066126http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219024900000255http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0129183111016300http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0129183111016300http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.04.027http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781455227051.001http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781455227051.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.05.018http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.028http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.028https://stats.bis.org/https://stats.bis.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.70.026110http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.70.026110
1 Introduction2 Methods3 Analysis of Global Banking Network by
Random Matrix Theory4 Conclusion