-
Analysis of Monetary Policy and Inflation:
Evidence from Uzbekistans Macro Economy
BY
Salimov Khondamir Makhamadjonovich
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of
MASTER OF ARTS IN
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
at the
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JAPAN
2010
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
The thesis of Salimov Khondamir Makhamadjonovich is approved by
the Thesis Examining Committee.
_______________________________ Professor Ching-Yang Lin
(Examiner)
_______________________________ Professor Hiroaki Miyamoto
(Supervisor)
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JAPAN
2010
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
iii
ABSTRACT OT THE THESIS
Analysis of Monetary Policy and Inflation: Evidence from
Uzbekistans Macro Economy
by
Salimov Khondamir Makhamadjonovich
Master of Arts in International Development International
University of Japan, 2010
Professor Hiroaki Miyamoto, Supervisor
This thesis studies the effect of monetary policies on price
levels in Uzbekistan for
the period between 1995 and 2009. We employ three alternative
time series analyses
and examine the relationship between output, price levels,
exchange rates, and
money supply in Uzbekistan. Empirical results demonstrate that
current inflation
rate is explained not only by money supply but also by other
monetary factors, such
as the exchange rate, interest rate, foreign price levels or
output growth. This study
shows that for the realization of an effective anti-inflationary
policy, other monetary
factors also need to be watched.
Key words: Monetary Policy, Price levels, Inflation Rate, Vector
autoregression.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Abstract.. iii
List of Figures v
List of Tables. vi
Acronyms... vii
Acknowledgements... viii
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION__________________________________ 1
Chapter 2: OVERVIEW OF MONETARY POLICY IN THE
REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN______________________
3
2.1- Monetary Policy and Growth of Uzbekistan in
General.......... 3
2.2- Historical relationship between inflation, Money growth,
GDP growth and exchange rates in Uzbekistan.....
7
Chapter 3: LITERATURE REVIEW____________________________ 11
3.1- Determinants of Inflation in Theory.... 11
3.2- Empirical Studies on the inflation-growth relationship...
12
3.3- Nexus of Monetary Policy and Price Levels... 15
Chapter 4: FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS AND
EMPRICAL ESTIMATION_________________________
18
4.1- Model Specification and Data.. 19
4.2- Data Analysis...... 24
Chapter 5: EMPRICAL RESULTS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS_ 32
Chapter 6: CONCLUDING REMARKS_________________________ 33
APPENDICES_______________________________________________ 36
BIBLIOGRAPHY____________________________________________ 39
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
v
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1:
Money Supply and Price Level Dynamics of Uzbekistan in
1995-20098
Figure 2:
Inflation and Money Growth Dynamics of Uzbekistan in
1995-2009..........8
Figure 3:
Dynamics of GDP growth and Inflation in Uzbekistan
(1995-2009)........9
Figure 4:
Impulse Response Function Results..28
Figure 5:
Accumulated Impulse Response Function Results .30
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1: Refinancing Rate of the CBU (1994-2009)..4
Table 2: GDP - real growth rate (%) 2009 Country Ranks.....6
Table 3: Descriptive Statistics ...24
Table 4: Unit Root Test results...25
Table 5: Johansen Cointegration Test.....25
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
vii
ACRONYMS
APEC Asia Pacific Economic Conference CB Central Bank CBU
Central Bank of Uzbekistan CIS Commonwealth of Independent States
CPI Consumer Price Index FSU Former Soviet Union GDP Gross Domestic
Product GNP Gross National Product IMF International Monetary Fund
IRF Impulse Response Function OECD Organization for Economic
Co-operation and
Development OLS Ordinary Least Squares PPP Purchasing Power
Parity USD United States Dollars UZS Uzbek soum VAR Vector Auto
Regression VECM Vector Error Correction WPI Wholesale Price Index
WTO World Trade Organization
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
viii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
First, and above all else, I would like to thank to our Almighty
for His blessing,
guidance and love. It is through His mercy that I have been able
to succeed this far.
Taking this opportunity I would like to thank several people who
have a
significant impact in my life at IUJ and writing this thesis.
First and foremost, I am
indebted to my supervisor Professor Miyamoto Hiroaki and to my
thesis examiner
Professor Lin Ching-Yang for their invaluable comments and
suggestions which
improved this work.
Other than that, I would like to express my sincere appreciation
to Japan Grant
Aid for Human Resource Development (JDS) program, for affording
me the
opportunity to come to IUJ to study.
I would like to extend my appreciations to all the teachers in
IUJ and in my
previous study for their invaluable knowledge transfer during my
life.
I am also indebted to my friends, for their constant support and
encouragement.
To all Yamato-machi people for their hospitality that made my
stay in Japan more
enjoyable.
Last but not least, I am forever indebted to my parents,
especially to my father
Mahammadjon Ahmadjonovich Salimov (May Allah have mercy on him)
and other
members of my family for their spiritually support and very
useful advices for life.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
1
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
In developing countries and countries in transition to market
economy, the
primary goal is to achieve the stability of an economy by
maintaining low inflation
rate and stabilizing prices. In Uzbekistan, the unmanageable
growth of the price
level is one of the most important issues on the way of economic
reforms.
Uzbekistan experienced hyperinflation in 1994 and the growth
rate of price levels
exceeded 1200 percent per year.1 High level of inflation has a
negative impact on
production, and leads to decreases in investment, overflows of
banking speculation
and trade. In order to stabilize the price level, it is well
known that monetary
policies play an important role.2 However, the effect of
monetary policies on price
levels in Uzbekistan has not been studied in the formal
framework.3
The purpose of this paper is to study the effect of monetary
policies on price
levels in Uzbekistan. In particular, this study evaluates the
effectiveness of monetary
policy in controlling the inflation. For this purpose, I employ
three alternative time
series analyses and examine the relationship between price
levels, exchange rates,
and money supply in Uzbekistan.
1 This inflation rate was one of the highest among Central Asian
countries and was the highest value after 1991 in Uzbekistan. 2
Monetary policy represents a set of interconnected measures
undertaken by the Central Bank with aim to regulate business
activity through planned influence on loan and money circulation.
Keeping reasonable levels of price stability has been a main target
of monetary policies in Uzbekistans economy. 3 Before the
transition period to market economy, Uzbekistan was in planned
economic system. Hence, there was no reason to consider stabilizing
the price levels.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
2
Empirical results do not show a clear relationship between money
supply and
the price level. This implies that the central bank of
Uzbekistan has not succeeded
controlling price level by controlling money supply. However, if
we take a look to
the data, we can see the same upward trends for both money
supply growth and
price level4
The remainders of this paper are organized as follows. Second
chapter explains
the overview of monetary policy, growth and price levels of the
country in general.
Third chapter discusses literature review on determinants of
inflation in theory and
empirical studies on relationship between inflation and monetary
policy. Framework
of the analysis is clarified in the fourth chapter and data
analysis, model
specification and methodology are explained. In the fifth
chapter, empirical results
and discussions are explained. Finally, chapter six presents
policy implications and
gives some concluding remarks.
. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of exchange and interest
rates to the
inflation as well. In contrast, there are short term and long
term effects of foreign
price level, interest rate and exchange rate movements to the
inflation rate.
4 See Figure 1 for the detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
3
Chapter 2: OVERVIEW OF MONETARY POLICY IN THE REPUBLIC OF
UZBEKISTAN
2.1 Monetary Policy and Growth of Uzbekistan in General
Monetary policy plays a key role in achieving macroeconomic
stability in
developing countries and countries in transition to market
relations as well, where,
as we know, there is instability in key macroeconomic
indicators, especially in
inflation.
It is obvious that an important advantage of monetary policy is
the flexible and
quick impact on the economic condition of the country. The
results of this monetary
policy immediately affect the financial condition of the
country. This is especially
important in the application of immediate measures to fight
against inflation. Thus, I
tried to pay more attention to the Central Banks instruments of
monetary control
and their effectiveness in the short-run and long term.
In the initial stages of the transition to market economy, like
many other CIS
countries Uzbekistan also faced macroeconomic issues such as:
recession, rising
unemployment and inflation rates, shortage of financial
resources, the budget deficit.
By ensuring price stability, monetary policy creates conditions
conducive to
economic growth, strengthens the macroeconomic and financial
stability of the
country. To prevent the growth of macroeconomic issues and to
achieve the stability
Uzbekistan had to develop a special program of stabilization, to
introduce its own
national currency and select the instruments of monetary
policy.
Introduction own national currency in 1993-1994s marked as the
beginning of
the economic development of the republics own domestic monetary
policy.
Proceeding from the conditions of the initial phase of reforms,
Uzbekistan clearly
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
4
identified the tactical and strategic objectives of monetary
policy. The strategic goal
of the Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU) was to employ standard
instruments of
monetary regulation which were characteristic of developed
countries. However, in
many developing countries in the early transition stage they
prevented the use of
tools specific to market economy.
Taking into account these realities, CBU decided making a
radical change in
monetary policy, such as, rebuilt credit and interest rate
policy in order to reduce the
monetary channels of the inflation. To achieve this goal, the
CBU applied the tools
of refinancing which is interest rate policy. In 1994-1995s CBUs
refinancing rate
increased as follows. Since October 1994 150%, from January 1995
225%, from
1st of March 1995 300% then from second half of 1995 it
decreased to 84% and
gradually decreased to 14% in 2009.
Table 1: Refinancing Rate of the CBU (1994-2009)
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 225.0 84.0 48.0 30.0
36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 30.0 24.0 18.0 16.0 14.0
14.0 14.0 14.0
Source: CBU
Between the short terms, applying costly money policy by CBU led
to reduce
bank lending this is consequently led to decrease in investment
activity that in turn
resulted a decline in production. On the other hand, there were
long-term goals of
this monetary policy of CBU such as reducing inflation and
strengthening the
national currency.
From the second half of the 1994, interest rate policy of CBU
has changed.
Mostly, it focused on two interrelated goals: keeping the level
of monetary
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
5
indicators at specified rate and liquidity of the banking system
and secondly,
achieving and maintaining the macroeconomic stability.
Benchmarking the reserve requirements for banks was a process in
transition to
market relations and one of the main economic instruments for
implementing
monetary policy. Interest rate and rate for reserve requirements
rose in 1994.
The purpose of introducing these changes was the adaptation of
reserve
requirement tools for monetary development in order to prepare
for the introduction
of its own national currency. Therefore, CBU increased the rate
of reserve
requirements in order to reduce the money supply. The funds
attracted for up to 3
years term the rate is set at 30%, and for a period exceeding 3
years -10%. With the
improvement of market relations and the use of government
securities, the interest
rate and reserve requirements in subsequent years were
significantly reduced.
History shows that monetary policy carried out by CBU to curb
the growth of
the monetary base, currency in circulation result a downward
trend in inflation. If
the annual growth rate of money supply in 1995 was 2.6 times
that in the subsequent
years of 1996, 2000, 2005, and 2009 were 2.2, 1.5, 1.3, and 1.4
respectively. The
level of annual CPI reached more than 12 times between the
periods 1992-1996,
however, in 2002 this rate reduced to 20%. Consequently this
process positively
affected the dynamics of interest rates in the money market and
exchange rate in the
domestic market.
Next steps of CBU were associated with exchange policy of
foreign currency.
In 2004, as a result of foreign exchange liberalization, by
introducing the
convertibility of national currency the amount of the
transactions on the domestic
market increased significantly. In 2009, main reforms and
development programs
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
6
effectively realized. Gross Domestic Product improved by 8.1%,
industrial output -
by 9.0%, agriculture by 5.7%, investment by 9.1%, trade by 16.6%
and
services by 12.9%. According to the Table 2 below, annual GDP
growth rate of
the country was higher than growth rates in Russia (6.0%),
Moldova (7.3%),
Kazakhstan (3.0%), Ukraine (2.1%) and Tajikistan (7.9%). In
2009, Uzbekistans
position was fourth in terms of growth of GDP among FSU
countries after
Azerbaijan (11.6%), Turkmenistan (10.0%) and Belarus (9.2%) and
9th in the world.
Table 2: GDP - real growth rate (%) 2009 Country Ranks
Rank Country GDP Growth,% 1 Macau 15.0 2 Angola 13.2 3
Azerbaijan 11.6 4 Qatar 11.2 5 Anguilla 10.2 6 Turkmenistan 10.0 7
China 9.8 8 Belarus 9.2 9 Uzbekistan 8.9 14 Tajikistan 7.9 30
Russia 6.0 48 World 3.8 55 Kazakhstan 3.0 64 Ukraine 2.1 72 US 1.3
75 EU 1.0
Source: CIA World Fact book 2009
Furthermore, in 2009 accelerating economic growth also
accomplished by a
effective and balanced fiscal and monetary policies. The budget
surplus amounted
0.5% of GDP. Producers tax burden has been reduced. The result
of tight monetary
policy led to decrease inflation level up to 7.4 percent.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
7
The CBU conducted intensive monetary policy in last recent years
and one of
the main goals of the CBU was to strengthen the purchasing power
of the currency.
To maintain the sustainable levels of national currency, the CBU
implemented a
tight monetary policy and decreased the impact of monetary
factors on price levels.
2.2 Historical relationship between inflation, Money growth,
GDP
growth and exchange rates in Uzbekistan
In this part our objectives are analyzing the relationship
between inflation and
GDP growth and money supply growth in periods from 1995 to 2009.
When
monetary or fiscal policy are not stable, the economy of the
country suffers from
serious macroeconomic imbalances such as rising inflation and
money supply,
multiple exchange rates which overvalue the currency, a
distorted interest rate
regime, unreliable statistics and an inability to resolve
national accounts to
determine a realistic GDP figure. According to quantity theory
of money, the money
supply and inflation have a positive relationship in terms of
increase in the money
stock and increase in the price level.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
8
Figure 1: Money Supply and Price Level Dynamics of Uzbekistan in
1995-2009.
Figure 1 above is consistent with quantity theory of money,
which we can see
the relationship between money supply and price levels is
positive. Money supply
gradually increased year by year, simultaneously, inflation rate
has a upward trend
in this period of time.
Figure 2: Inflation and Money Growth Dynamics of Uzbekistan in
1995-2009
0.0
2000.0
4000.0
6000.0
8000.0
10000.0
12000.0
0.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58
UZS
CPI
, 199
4=10
0
Price Level Money Supply
BlnU
ZS
Quarters (1995-2009)
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45
47 49 51 53 55 57 59
Date, I/1995-IV/2009
%
Infl, % M2 Gr, bln UZS
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
9
However, if we take a close look to Figure 2, we can see the
negative link
between price levels and money growth as well. Maybe this is
because of there are
some other factors affecting the inflation rate more than money
supply. Under
normal conditions, relationship between money supply and
inflation is not
immediate and so we should not expect all outcomes of currently
implemented
monetary policy actions to happen in the same current period.
The thing for
Uzbekistan is the time it takes a change in money stock to start
affecting on inflation.
Simultaneously, if we take look to Uzbekistans GDP
growth-inflation relations, we
can see the similar pattern between these two variables.
Figure 3: Dynamics of GDP growth and Inflation in Uzbekistan
(1995-2009)
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
1 3 5 7 9 11131517192123252729313335373941434547495153555759
Infla
tion,
%
Date Infl, % Real GDPSA Gr,bln UZSIU
J INT
ERNA
L USE
ONL
Y
-
10
Figure 3 demonstrates the dynamics of inflation and GDP growth
which are
moving inversely between these years. The possible reason maybe
is the impact of
the current inflation happens after some time later.
Thus, one of the objectives of this study is to determine these
time lags in order
to estimate the future inflation levels.
In 2009, the exchange rate of UZS against USD depreciated by
8.5% in
comparison with 2008. The depreciation of the exchange rate
indicates positive
expectations of market participants. It also indicates that,
market demand for foreign
currency was lower than previous years.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
11
Chapter 3: LITERATURE REVIEW
In this section, we introduce the other theoretical research
papers and analytical
studies on this topic. In order to understand consequences and
sources of inflation
clearly, it is better to explain theoretical background of the
monetary policy and
inflation. Even though some studies contradict each other, there
is vast literature on
relationship between inflation, monetary policy and prices.
3.1 Determinants of Inflation in Theory
One of the best known economics scholars Friedman Milton said,
The only
cure for inflation is to reduce the rate at which total spending
is growing.5 In his
work he emphasized that monetary measures have more considerable
and reliable
effects than fiscal policies on total spending. Actually, he
offered the finding, I
dont think monetary policy has to be backed up by fiscal policy
at all. I think
monetary policy can curb inflation.6 Friedmans logic behind this
was simple: A
budget deficit is inflationary if, and only if, it is financed
in considerable part by
printing money 7
5 The only cure for inflation...: Friedman Newsweek column,
November 12, 1979.
explicitly, only if fiscal policy decisions are made by the
monetary authorities. He offered the policy implication on the
importance of
monetary actions for total spending, and aggregate spending for
inflation as:
Monetary policy is an appropriate and proper tool when directed
at achieving price
6 See Friedman interview in New Zealand Herald (1981) for the
detail. 7 See Friedman interview in Chicago Daily News (1970) for
the detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
12
stability or a desired rate of price change.8
Perhaps, Phillip Cagan is famous for a work which tried to
identify the
fundamental relationships between output, money and prices. In
his work
Nowadays this theory motivates the
monetary policy framework of main economies.
9
he tried
to analyze the hypotheses such as, Inflation process is
self-generating and
Increase in price levels caused by money supply expansion
during
hyperinflationary period. After the publication of Cagans work,
many famous
economists either developed or repeated analyze of the Cagans
Model. Particularly
Barro (1970), Sargent (1977), Frenkel (1975), Abel (1979).
Moreover, nowadays
economists in monetary field frequently refer to his Demand
function while
analyzing value of money.
3.2 Empirical Studies on the inflation-growth relationship
In general the relationship between long-run growth and
inflation is negative.
However, some empirical researches give variety of results, thus
it is hard to say
there is a negative long-run relationship because in the
short-term a Philips curve
occurrence can lead to a positive relationship between economic
growth and
inflation. There have been a huge number of researches from best
known scholars
provided negative relationship. Particularly, Barro (1997) found
an empirical result
that inflation behavior has a negative relationship with
economic growth. The paper
written by Barro covered more than 100 countries between the
periods 1960-1990
and the results show that increase inflation by 10 percent leads
to decrease in growth
8 See Friedman in Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic
Review, (1977). 9 See Cagan, Phillip (1956) for the detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
13
of GDP per capita by 0.2 0.3 percent per year. Moreover, he
suggested that
although the effect is very small, the long-run influences on
living standards are
significant. For example, monetary action that increases
long-run inflation rate by 10
percent per year lowers the Real GDP levels 4-7 percent after 30
years which
justifies strong attention to price stability.
Lately, Bruno and Easterly (1998) have provided some
clarification and
concluded that the negative relationship between growth and
inflation is caused by
high inflation crises, for the periods when there is inflation
rate is above 40 % per
year.
However, in early empirical researches around 1960s on inflation
and economic
growth were ambiguous like theory. Studies of International
Monetary Fund (IMF)
Papers about that period didnt identify any relationship between
inflation and
economic growth.10 Although inflation rate in Latin America
reached more than 10
percent in 1950s and 1960s their growth was good. For example,
Brazil is often
referred to as high inflation and high growth counterexample to
outdated view that
inflation is bad for the economy11. Wallichs (1969) findings are
also interesting. He
used cross section analysis of 43 countries, with pooled data
for the periods 1956-65.
Like other literatures of that time he also had expected
positive relationship between
economic growth and inflation. However, instead of this he got
strong negative
relationship.12
After 1980s countries experienced new severe inflation
processes, which were
empirically studied after the 1980s. In this period of time
literature focused on the
10 See Tun Wai, U., (1959) for the detail. 11 See Pazos Felipe,
(1972) for the detail. 12 See Wallich, Henry C., (1969) for the
detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
14
short term output costs in hyperinflation process. There were
very low or any output
costs for stabilization of high inflation, while cost of the
stabilization of low
inflations was quite high. Thus presumption of the studies in
the 1980s was a
positive relationship between inflation and economic growth in
the short-run.
According to the new theorists, high level of prices might
affect the economic
growth negatively. In 1993 Dornbusch and Fischer reported his
findings that
inflation was negatively related to economic growth.13
Similarly in his next paper, Easterly analyzed the yearly
pattern of the inflation
fluctuations and found that before and during the peak of the
high inflation period
GDP per capita growth declined. Per capita growth recovered
immediately after the
first year of peak of the inflation then started improving to
high levels thereafter.
They analyzed persistence
and sources of moderate price level experience. In their study
they provided 8 case
studies for different countries and according to their
conclusion, by combining
incomes policy, deflationary fiscal policy and exchange rate
actions and by
exploiting of positive supply shocks to make the inflation rate
down countries could
decrease moderate inflation rates to low inflation rates.
A paper written by Mark N. Harris, Max Gillman and Lszl Mtys in
2001 is
based on a monetary model of growth for describing inflation
processes. Their
model suggested a negative relationship between inflation and
growth and especially
this inverse relationship is stronger at lower levels of
inflation. This paper
empirically analyzed model for the OECD and APEC countries for
the periods from
1961 to 1997. The statistically significant results of
econometric model show that
when inflation rate declines growth increases marginally for
OECD member
13 See Dornbusch, Rudiger and Fischer, Stanley, (1993).
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
15
countries. For APEC member countries results were similar by
using instrumental
variables.
In 1985 Kormendi and Meguire examined relationship between price
levels and
economic growth by using cross-sectional data for forty seven
countries from 1950
to 1977 and the results showed a significant negative
relationship.
3.3 Nexus of Monetary Policy and Price Levels
The thought that money supply growth leads to increase in price
levels is one of
the oldest idea in economics. In 1752 David Hume examined money
and price levels
and found that increases in prices correlated with increases in
money supply.
Concluding the evidence of Hume, Friedman said Inflation is
always and
everywhere a monetary phenomenon14
If we take a close look to recent researches, many well known
economists also
have found close relationship between changes in money supply
and inflation. For
instance, Lucas in 1980 presented 2 implications of money supply
theory: that
change of supply of money results the same change in the rate of
price level and also
same change in nominal interest rates by using quarterly
time-series data of U.S. for
the period from 1953 to 1977. Inspire of considerable evidences
and a long history,
relationship between money supply and price levels remain
disputed. Maybe this is
because of empirical relationship between price levels and money
supply growth
holds for long time periods that empirical suggestions are not
informative for
policymakers, who are concerning about the inflation of near
future. Some of the
in 1963.
14 See Friedman, Milton (1992) for the detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
16
empirical studies were based on more than thirty years
observation data. However,
Dwyer found short-term linkage between inflation and money
supply growth rates15
Other IMF working paper prepared by Wojciech Malizsewski (2003)
explains
the behavior of inflation in Georgian the post stabilization
period, after introduction
of the national currency Lari in October 1995. A long-term
equation linking prices
to money and exchange rates, as well as a short-run, dynamic
equation for inflation
are estimated. This paper attempts to throw some light on the
behavior of inflation
Georgia and to construct a tool for formulation and evaluation
of the monetary
policy. It tests for the presence of economically interpretable
long-run relationships
between money, inflation and exchange rates.
.
The results of the econometric model show that the long-run
inflation equation
expresses prices as a function of money, exchange rate and real
income. Short-run
dynamics of inflation are strongly affected by changes of money
supply, exchange
rate and oil prices. As one of the FSU republics, the Georgian
macroeconomic
situation is similar to Uzbekistans economy, as both countries
were affected by
external shocks and their economies have been highly dollarized
and parallel market
exchange rates have played a significant role at the beginning
of independence and
following this paper is useful in Uzbekistans case.
Callen and Chang (1999) estimate two models of the inflation
process in India:
one is based on a monetary approach and the other uses output
gap and they then
assess their ability to forecast recent inflation developments.
Second, they use a
series of vector autoregressions (VARs) for forecasting future
inflation. The authors
argue that wholesale price index (WPI) has broader coverage and
is published more
15 See Dwyer, G. and Hafer, R.W. (1999) for the detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
17
frequently than consumer price index (CPI) in India. So that
they preferred to
analyze WPI even though CPI is more relevant in measuring
inflation. So the
empirical work focuses on forecasting both the overall WPI and
manufacturing price
index. The paper applied co-integration techniques to model the
long-run behavior
of prices and then derives dynamic equation for inflation based
on these results. The
paper found some important results determining inflation in
India and that prices of
primary goods are largely derived from climatic conditions and
by changes in
administered prices. Monetary aggregates also appear to contain
the best information
about future inflation. Consecutively, the authors give some
policy implications and
also raise number issues for the monetary authorities.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
18
Chapter 4: FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS AND EMPRICAL ESTIMATION
This paper studies the effect of monetary policies on price
levels in Uzbekistan.
For this purpose, we employ three alternative econometric
models: the linear
regression model, the vector autoregression (VAR) model, and
vector error
correction (VECM) model. Based on the results of primary tests,
the cointegration
test and the unit root test, we choose the appropriate
method.
If there is a cointegration between variables and estimation of
Linear
Regression Model is unbiased then we will use simple OLS. On the
other hand, if
equations are not cointegrated then we will use either VAR or
VECM for further
analysis. Choosing VAR or VECM depends on the Unit Root Test. If
the variables
has unit root in the level then we will use VECM otherwise, if
there is no unit root at
least in one variable then we will use VAR. Since we use time
series data, we should
test the stationary of the each variable in the model. It is
important to make sure that
the variables used for the study are stationary or
non-stationary, because, when the
series become non-stationary then we can obtain spurious
estimation results. These
results lead us to inappropriate conclusions even OLS regression
shows significant
results. The null hypothesis of the stationary test is that the
variables have unit root
problem which means non-stationary.
Next step is to check if the variables are cointegrated or not.
In 1987, Engle and
Granger introduced the concept of cointegration. The
cointegration test examines
whether series have a long term equilibrium or long-run
relationship. Testing for
cointegration combines the problems of unit root tests and tests
with parameters
unidentified under the null hypothesis. In a series of examples
it is found that
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
19
consumption and income are co-integrated, wages and prices are
not, short and long
interest rates are, and nominal GNP is co-integrated with M2,
but not M1, M3, or
aggregate liquid assets 16
. In our study we also test the long-run equilibrium
relationship between non-stationary variables by using Jahansen
Cointegration Test.
If in the long-run, variables are cointegrated each other then
OLS method is efficient
and unbiased otherwise we employ VAR model.
4.1- Model Specification and Data
The first alternative method is simple linear regression by
employing
economic series such as output, money supply, exchange rate,
interest rate, foreign
price and price level for further analysis of inflation of
Uzbekistan.
Consider an economy producing tradable and non-tradable goods.
Following
Obsfeld and Rogoff (1996), we assume that the overall price
level pt is a weighted
average of the price of tradable goods pT and non-tradable goods
pN. Thus, the
overall price level is represented by the standard log-linear
form:
= + (1 ) , (1) where is the share of tradable goods in total
domestic expenditure.
We assume that the price of tradable goods pT is governed by the
absolute
purchasing power parity (PPP), the hypothesis that the long-run
exchange rate et is
determined by domestic prices relative to foreign prices
pft17
= + , (2)
. In logarithm form this
implies:
16 See Engle, R. F. and Granger, C.W.J, (1987). 17 See Dornbusch
(1982) for the detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
20
It is assumed that the price of non-tradable goods depends on
both supply and
demand factors. Demand for non-tradable is assumed to be related
to overall demand
in the economy which for simplicity, can be represented by the
money market
equilibrium18
= 1 2 , (3) .
where ms and md represent the supply and the demand for real
money balances,
respectively.
The demand for real money balances is specified by the standard
Cagan money
demand function19
= 0 1, (4) . Thus, we have
where yt is the real income and it is the nominal interest
rate.
Substituting equations (2), (3), and (4) into (1) we get:
= + + (1 )(1 0 1) , (5) Equation (5) implies that the overall
price level is function of output, money
supply, exchange rate, foreign price, and interest rate. Thus,
we have
Pt=f(Yt, Mt, Et, Pft, It) , (6)
Now we are in the stage to propose the first our econometric
model. In order to
examine the effect of monetary policies on inflation, we
consider the following
simple linear regression model.
= 0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + , (7) where M is money supply, Y is
output, ER is exchange rate of UZS to USD, Pf is
foreign price(USD CPI), IR is interest rate and P is price
level.
18 See Moser, G.G. (1995) for the detail. 19 See Cagan (1956)
for the detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
21
The second proposed method is Vector Autoregression (VAR) model.
VAR
model provides a useful framework to analyze the effect of
monetary policies, and a
number of studies have examined the relationship between money
supply and,
inflation (see for example Kamin and Rogers, 2000).
We are interested in the relationship between inflation, price
levels, and
macroeconomic variables. In particular, we are interested in how
prices and
macroeconomic variables affect inflation rate, and also how
inflation rate influences
them. In order to examine, we use the Granger-
The basic idea of the Granger-Causality Test is that past values
of variables can
explain current values of variables and usually it is performed
by assessing the
significance of parameters in the following regression:
Yt= + t + 1Yt-1 + + pYt-1 + 1Xt-p + + qXq-1 + et
Here X Granger causes Y if any or all of 1 , , q are
statistically significant. In
other words, if X at any time in the past has explanatory power
for the current value
of Y, then we can say X Granger causes Y.
Vector in VAR indicates the more than one variable will be
predicted. Thus, a
set of regressions is run simultaneously and this indicates that
variables will be
regressed on their own past values. Our model also includes
macroeconomic
variables: inflation rate, output, money supply, exchange rate,
foreign price and
interest rate. As mentioned previous parts, we are interested in
whether these
variables have relationship with inflation by lag length and, in
their turn, whether
money supply, output, exchange rate, interest rate and foreign
price are influenced
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
22
by lagged values of the variable inflation. In order to check
this, we will apply the
Granger-Causality Test.
Following the Sims we can also take the first difference when
variables are
non-stationary. On the other hand, in their study (1990) Sims,
Stock and Watson
mentioned that the VAR with non-stationary variables incur some
loss in estimators
efficiency although it may have in term of estimators
consistency. Since the major
target is to examine the effectiveness of the monetary policy in
monitoring the high
inflation by using non-stationary data, the estimators
consistency could be more
important than estimators efficiency in our problem. Thus, we
analyze the
relationship between five main macroeconomic variables:
inflation rate, GDP,
money supply, exchange rate, interest rate and foreign price
level to employ a VAR.
The main outcomes of the VAR estimation are vector
autoregression estimates
and impulse-response functions. To analyze the interaction
between variables, this
study mostly relies on the impulse-response function (IRF). The
IRF trace the effects
of a shock to one endogenous variable on to the other variables
in the VAR model.
The third alternative method is Vector Error Correction Model
(VECM).
One way of addressing this non-stationary issue is the use of
first-differenced
time series in estimating the equation. This issue was first
proposed by Granger in
1981 and later by Engle and Granger in 1987. According to Engle
and Granger,
researchers can develop the cointegration relationship between
variables to address
the non-stationary problem of variables. Their argument is that,
if two or more
variables are cointegrated, that is, if there is a long
relationship between them, then
the short run dynamics of the variables can be described by an
Error Correction
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
23
Model 20
In this research we propose three alternative econometric
methods to analyze
the relationship between inflation and other economic variables.
Depending on the
results of unit root and cointegration tests, we will choose one
of these methods. If
the variables are non-stationary and there is no cointegration
between equations then
we can take first difference of the variables and run OLS or use
Vector
Autoregression model for further analysis. On the other hand, if
the variables are
non-stationary and there is cointegration between variables then
we use Vector Error
Correction Model (VECM). In this research we also assume a
similar approach.
Then, we explore the existence of the cointegration relationship
between variables
based on standard cointegration techniques.
. This has become the standard empirical approach to address the
non-
stationary issue of time series data since the seminar paper by
Engle and Granger in
1987.
Data
This paper uses main macroeconomics variables of Uzbekistan for
the
analysis of all three alternative methods: OLS, VAR and VECM
methods. For these
methods I used price level (P), money supply (M), output (Y),
exchange rate of UZS
to USD (ER), foreign price (Pf) which is USD CPI and interest
rate (IR). All
variables are quarterly for the period from 1st quarter of 1995
to 4th quarter of 2009.
The data on most variables are taken from Central Bank of the
Republic of
Uzbekistan. Other sources of the data are International Monetary
Fund, Asian
Development Bank and State Statistics Committee of the Republic
of Uzbekistan.
20 See Engle, R. F. and Granger, C.W.J, (1987) for the
detail.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
24
The descriptive statistics of these variables are presented in
Table 3.
Table 3: Descriptive Statistics
Inflation
Rate GDP Money Supply
Exchange Rate
Foreign Price
Interest Rate
Mean 1197.82 3201.56 2167.87 686.66 126.25 3.92 Median 1389.67
1682.95 899.53 767.80 124.55 2.36 Maximum 2230.27 15757.10 11150.66
1511.40 151.53 53.67 Minimum 148.45 34.20 23.92 26.10 105.28 0.17
Std. Dev. 643.47 3810.30 2804.41 536.46 14.13 7.62 Skewness -0.14
1.54 1.61 0.00 0.23 5.21 Kurtosis 1.65 4.71 4.61 1.34 1.82 32.73
Observations 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00
Source: Authors estimations
4.2- Data Analysis
By employing Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test, we examine
whether the
data are stationary or not. Table 4 reports the results of the
ADF tests for all the
variables.
Table 4: Unit Root Test results
Variables Augmented Dickey-Fuller test
Level 1st Difference 2nd Difference
Price Level -0.51 -2.69* -9.41***
Exchange Rate 0.47 -6.13*** -8.80***
Interest Rate -2.32 -10.62*** -10.45***
Foreign Price -1.71 -2.73 -6.97***
Money Supply Growth -2.11 -6.19*** -6.50***
Output -2.17 -10.01*** -8.46***
Note: (***), (**) and (*) means significant at the 1%, 5% and
10% confidence level respectively.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
25
According to the results of the stationary tests above, we can
reject the null
hypothesis of all variables at the level. This implies that
although for all variables we
cannot reject the hull of unit roots in the level, we can reject
the null of unit roots in
the first difference except foreign price level. This implies
that prices, output, money
supply, exchange rate, interest rate except foreign price are
stationary in first
difference.
Johansen Cointegration Test
The results of the Johansen Cointegration Test are shown in the
Table 5 below:
Table 5: Johansen Cointegration Test
Hypothesized Number of Cointegrated Equations
Eigenvalue Trace 0.05
Trace Statistic
Critical Value
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis p-
values None * 0.67 172.52 103.85 0.00 At most 1 * 0.56 111.76
76.97 0.00 At most 2 * 0.47 66.17 54.08 0.00 At most 3 0.24 31.08
35.19 0.13 At most 4 0.15 15.85 20.26 0.18 At most 5 0.11 6.61 9.16
0.15
Note: * denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05
level
According to the Table 4 above, trace test indicates 3
cointegrating equations at
the 0.05 level which means there are some cointegrated equations
in the long-run
relationship. This can lead us to spurious results in the simple
regression. Many
researchers would neglect valuable information regarding the
long-run relationship
between the non-stationary variables. Due to the Unit root test
and Cointegration test,
the OLS and VECM estimates spurious because of the
non-stationary issues.
Therefore, we conduct the VAR model as an alternative way in
this paper.
Appendix 2 presents the results from OLS estimation of VAR(2).
Since there
are five variables and two lags in our VAR, there are five
equations to estimate.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
26
Each equation regress a dependent variable on each lag of the
variables in the VAR.
Carrying out the Pairwise Granger causality test we test whether
endogenous
variables can be treated as exogenous. If we examine the
significant coefficients,
some interesting patterns emerge from the test:
All variables output, interest rate, foreign price Granger cause
but money supply
and exchange rate do not cause Inflation;
All variables money supply, exchange rate, and foreign price
Granger cause
output;
All variables inflation rate, output, exchange rate, interest
rate except foreign
price do not Granger cause money supply;
All variables output, money supply, foreign price and interest
rate except
inflation rate do not Granger cause exchange rate;
All variables exchange rate and interest rate, money supply
except inflation rate
and output do not Granger cause foreign price;
All variables money supply, exchange rate and inflation rate
except output and
foreign price Granger cause interest rate;
The results demonstrate that past values of output, foreign
price and interest
rate can explain current inflation. On the other hand, the
inflation rate is Granger
cause for exchange rate.
Furthermore, for analyzing how our variables affect each other
over different
time horizons, we can precede dynamic analysis of our model by
applying Impulse
Response Analysis. The Impulse-Response Function (IRF) shows us
how a one-time
positive shock to one of the endogenous variables affects not
only that variable, but
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
27
also transmitted to all the other endogenous variables in the
VAR through the lag
structure of the model.
Figure 4: Impulse Response Function Results
Note: Red dotted lines indicate Confidence Intervals
Source: Authors estimations
-.04
-.02
.00
.02
.04
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of LNPRL to LNGDP
-.04
-.02
.00
.02
.04
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of LNPRL to LNM
-.04
-.02
.00
.02
.04
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of LNPRL to LNER
-.04
-.02
.00
.02
.04
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of LNPRL to LNPF
-.04
-.02
.00
.02
.04
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Response of LNPRL to LNIR
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
28
As a result of the Granger-Causality Test we see that, some
variables in our
model Granger affect the inflation rate some of them not. Hence,
let us take a look to
the response of inflation rate to the other macroeconomic
variables from the Figure 4
above. From the graph we can say that if we increase GDP growth
for one time
period, at time period 0, then in the first two quarters growth
rate of the inflation
grows more quickly than otherwise. However, the response of
growth of inflation
rate to money supply growth shows unclear effect which means
when we increase
the money supply one time, there is almost no effect to the
growth of the inflation.
For the response of growth of inflation rate to growth of
exchange rate and foreign
price we can say that if there is one time positive shock in
foreign price level or
exchange rate then inflation level increases slightly over time.
On the other hand,
when there is one time shock in the interest rate consequently
inflation rate goes
down and keeps its level in the long-run as well.
We got similar findings when we analyzed the accumulated
responses of the
price level to other variables. Accumulated Impulse-response
function results
demonstrate the effect of increase in one variable to another in
general instead of
one time shock.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
29
Figure 5: Accumulated Impulse Response Function Results.
Note: Red dotted lines indicate Confidence Intervals
Source: Authors estimations
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Accumulated Response of LNPRL to LNGDP
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Accumulated Response of LNPRL to LNM
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Accumulated Response of LNPRL to LNER
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Accumulated Response of LNPRL to LNPF
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Accumulated Response of LNPRL to LNIR
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
30
According to the Figure 5 above, we can see almost similar trend
over time
with Figure 1. In accumulated Impulse response functions the
response of price
level to the output, exchange rate and foreign price levels have
same directions
which means when output, exchange rate and foreign price levels
increase, then the
growth rate of inflation starts to increase slightly over time.
This implies that
increase in price levels are linked with an increase in GDP
growth, exchange rate
growth and increase in foreign prices. However, it is difficult
to reach a conclusion
regarding the response of inflation growth to money supply
growth. Because from
the graph we can see that, if money supply growth rises then
this shock doesnt
affect the inflation growth at all.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
31
Chapter 5: EMPRICAL RESULTS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Based on above findings, it seems that the central bank in
Uzbekistan cannot
control price levels successfully by controlling money supply.
Since the main
objective of the central bank of Uzbekistan is to maintain the
stability of price level,
the central bank can implement other instruments of monetary
policy, such as
interest rate policy or exchange rate policy as important
devices to control and
monitor the inflation rate. According to my findings, it is
obvious that the reduction
in the exchange rate by CBU can reduce the high inflation
rate.
There are some other policies which can also reduce the exchange
rate level.
The most efficient policy in many countries is to increase the
openness of the
country, which means the country should increase its competitive
export goods
which lead to decrease in exchange rate.
The second effective policy instrument in controlling the money
supply and
reducing the inflation is the adjustment of the interest rates.
In these circumstances,
decrease in money supply and price level can sustain the
economic growth of the
republic of Uzbekistan.
Third, foreign price level and interest rate movements have both
short-term and
long-term effects on the rate of price level. The effect of an
increase in the foreign
price level could be off-set to some extend by controlling the
exchange rate. This
strategy has become a more effective way of maintaining price
stability in small
open economy such as Singapore21
21 See Peng, T.K. and Shanmugaratnam, T. (1992) for the
detail.
.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
32
Chapter 6: CONCLUDING REMARKS
Stabilizing price levels is one of most important issues in
Uzbekistan. This
paper studies how monetary policies affect price levels in
Uzbekistan. For this
purpose, we use three alternative time series frameworks. To do
this, we tested unit
root and cointegration test then depending on the results, we
analyzed monetary and
non-monetary factors of inflation for last years. We estimated
VAR model,
implemented the Granger Causality test and applied Impulse
Response Analyses.
The present paper finds some interesting patterns after carrying
out the pair
wise Granger Causality test to test whether endogenous variables
can be treated as
exogenous. Our VAR model results demonstrate that lagged values
of GDP growth,
exchange rate, interest rate and foreign price can cause current
price level.
Moreover, Granger Causality test shows that lagged values
output, interest rate
and foreign price can cause current price level. Alternatively,
inflation rate can
affect the exchange rate.
Secondly, in order to examine the dynamic relationship between
inflation rate,
price levels, and outputs, we estimate VAR model and compute
IRFs.
According to the graphs of Impulse-Response Function we can say
that if
growth of the output, exchange rate and foreign price level
increase in one period,
then price level grows gradually over the period. However, the
response of inflation
growth to money supply growth demonstrates very small negative
correlation and
5 % confidence interval shows neutral area. Moreover, if we
increase interest rate in
time this can lead to decrease in price level.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
33
Thirdly, we can see the similar results from analyzes of the
accumulated
responses of inflation rate to other variables. All variables
except money supply and
interest rate have similar trend over time which means when
output growth,
exchange rate and foreign price levels increase, then the growth
rates of price levels
start increasing gradually over time. However, we cannot say
there is a relationship
between inflation growth and money supply growth by looking to
the accumulated
impulse response function graphs.
We conclude that, the current inflation rate is explained not
only by money
supply but also by other monetary factors, such as the exchange
rate, interest rate,
foreign price levels or output growth. This study demonstrates
that for the realization
of an effective anti-inflationary policy, other monetary factors
also need to be
watched. Their elimination will help curb the inflation rate and
reduce minimum
losses in the economy. To completely manage price levels through
controlling only
money supply is impossible. Instead, it is necessary to have
administrative,
structural and institutional measures directed at overcoming the
disproportions
which have arisen in the economy. We conclude that giving more
consideration to
both past and forecasted macroeconomic variables in the setting
operation procedure
would improve policy efficiency.
Furthermore, in October 2003, after more than decade of keeping
its current
account unconvertible, the Government of the Republic of
Uzbekistan announced
current account convertibility. This move signaled the end of
era in which the
country practiced a parallel market exchange rate and it is a
welcome step in the
development of an efficient monetary policy.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
34
As a result of tight monetary policy Uzbek economy experienced
the lowest
level of inflation 3.7 percent annually in 2004 and amounted 7.1
percent for 2009.
Past recent years prices strongly affected by non-monetary
factors such as dramatic
seasonal fluctuations, cost of monopoly, cost-push inflation and
wage increases.
Of course, this research cannot be regarded as the final word on
this issue
because of the limitations of the approach.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
35
APPENDICES Appendix 1: OLS Method Estimation Results
Dependent Variable: Inflation Growth Method: Least Squares
Sample: 1995Q1 2009Q4 Included observations: 60
Variable Coefficient Std.
Error t-Statistic Prob. C 22.37 2.74 8.17 0.0000 Output Growth
-0.22 0.05 -4.12 0.0001 Money Supply Growth 0.63 0.08 7.72 0.0000
Exchange Rate 0.39 0.03 13.77 0.0000 Foreign Price -4.23 0.62 -6.77
0.0000 Interest Rate -0.01 0.01 -1.32 0.1917 R-squared 0.99 Mean
dependent var 6.87 Adjusted R-squared 0.99 S.D. dependent var 0.75
S.E. of regression 0.08 Akaike info criterion -2.17 Sum squared
resid 0.33 Schwarz criterion -1.96 Log likelihood 71.06
Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.09 F-statistic 1066.04 Durbin-Watson stat
1.11 Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
36
Appendix 2: Vector Autoregression Estimation Results
Sample (adjusted): 1995Q3 2009Q4 Included observations: 58 after
adjustments Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]
Inflation Growth
Output Growth
Money Supply Growth
Growth of Exchange
Rate
Foreign Price
Interest Rate
Growth
Inflation
Growth (-1)
0.697078 -0.05407 0.209252 -0.03634 -0.0065 1.691285
-0.13998 -0.62404 -0.27011 -0.42784 -0.05631 -3.50216
[ 4.97991] [-0.08664] [ 0.77468] [-0.08494] [-0.11542] [
0.48293]
Inflation
Growth (-2)
0.084055 0.507556 -0.13799 0.630647 -0.05325 -3.20795
-0.12565 -0.56015 -0.24246 -0.38403 -0.05054 -3.14358
[ 0.66898] [ 0.90611] [-0.56913] [ 1.64216] [-1.05358]
[-1.02048]
Output
Growth (-1)
0.16964 0.037159 0.052825 0.012227 -0.00886 -3.76155
-0.0308 -0.13731 -0.05943 -0.09414 -0.01239 -0.77059
[ 5.50783] [ 0.27062] [ 0.88881] [ 0.12989] [-0.71537]
[-4.88138]
Output
Growth (-2)
-0.03413 -0.83624 -0.10373 -0.00532 0.030432 0.266476
-0.03069 -0.1368 -0.05921 -0.09379 -0.01234 -0.76775
[-1.11221] [-6.11274] [-1.75168] [-0.05672] [ 2.46533] [
0.34709]
Money Supply
Growth (-1)
-0.06931 0.757913 0.589047 -0.05128 0.026576 5.067075
-0.08541 -0.38076 -0.16481 -0.26105 -0.03436 -2.13687
[-0.81153] [ 1.99052] [ 3.57406] [-0.19644] [ 0.77351] [
2.37126]
Money Supply
Growth (-2)
0.029522 0.245704 0.232433 -0.25433 -0.00428 -1.18301
-0.08004 -0.35682 -0.15445 -0.24464 -0.0322 -2.00253
[ 0.36884] [ 0.68858] [ 1.50490] [-1.03963] [-0.13304]
[-0.59076]
Growth of Exchange Rate (-1)
0.088478 0.151494 -0.01967 0.926156 0.016201 -0.78
-0.04956 -0.22095 -0.09564 -0.15148 -0.01994 -1.23997
[ 1.78525] [ 0.68566] [-0.20571] [ 6.11400] [ 0.81264]
[-0.62905]
Growth of Exchange Rate (-2)
-0.07446 0.210248 0.020542 -0.13951 -0.00208 2.523594
-0.05046 -0.22498 -0.09738 -0.15424 -0.0203 -1.26259
[-1.47551] [ 0.93453] [ 0.21094] [-0.90445] [-0.10266] [
1.99874]
Foreign Price (-1) 1.037631 5.664705 2.404136 2.14193 0.315917
-20.7399
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
37
-0.44464 -1.98227 -0.85802 -1.35904 -0.17886 -11.1246
[ 2.33364] [ 2.85769] [ 2.80197] [ 1.57606] [ 1.76624]
[-1.86432]
Foreign Price (-2) -1.43385 -2.54382 0.169794 0.446151 0.280437
2.479659
-0.49884 -2.22387 -0.96259 -1.52468 -0.20066 -12.4805
[-2.87439] [-1.14387] [ 0.17639] [ 0.29262] [ 1.39754] [
0.19868]
Interest Rate Growth (-1)
-0.01266 0.016083 -0.00788 -0.02969 -0.00031 0.473986
-0.00638 -0.02842 -0.0123 -0.01949 -0.00256 -0.15951
[-1.98496] [ 0.56585] [-0.64073] [-1.52366] [-0.11905] [
2.97160]
Interest Rate Growth (-2)
-0.00796 0.020464 0.012199 0.010726 -0.00105 0.092622
-0.00621 -0.02767 -0.01198 -0.01897 -0.0025 -0.15527
[-1.28257] [ 0.73964] [ 1.01866] [ 0.56546] [-0.42141] [
0.59653]
C 2.679329 -14.1248 -11.264 -13.2629 1.982641 87.52793
-2.14138 -9.54656 -4.13219 -6.5451 -0.86141 -53.576
[ 1.25121] [-1.47957] [-2.72591] [-2.02639] [ 2.30163] [
1.63371]
R-squared 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.62 Adj. R-squared 1.00 0.99
1.00 1.00 0.99 0.51 Sum sq. resids 0.04 0.78 0.15 0.37 0.01 24.57
S.E. equation 0.03 0.13 0.06 0.09 0.01 0.74 F-statistic 2503.26
590.24 3331.68 977.54 392.06 6.01 Log likelihood 129.35 42.66 91.23
64.55 182.17 -57.39 Akaike AIC -4.01 -1.02 -2.70 -1.78 -5.83 2.43
Schwarz SC -3.55 -0.56 -2.24 -1.32 -5.37 2.89 Mean dependent 6.93
7.28 6.81 6.00 4.84 0.52 S.D. dependent 0.68 1.47 1.51 1.30 0.11
1.06
Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.)
8.17 Determinant resid covariance
1.78
Log likelihood
491.06 Akaike information criterion
-14.24
Schwarz criterion
-11.47
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
38
REFERENCES
Abel, Andrew B. (1981). Taxes, Inflation, and the Durability of
Capital, Journal of
Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, 89(3), 548-
60. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/1549.html
Agenor, P-R C., McDermott, J., Prasad, Eswar S. (2000).
Macroeconomic
fluctuations in developing countries: Some stylized facts. World
Bank
Economic Review 14(2), 251-286.
Akaike, H., (1973), Information theory and the extension of the
maximum
likelihood principle, in B.N. Petrov and F. Csaki, eds.,
Proceedings of the
Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Budapest,
pp.
267-281.
Antonio Moreno, (2004), Reaching Inflation Stability,Journal of
Money, Credit
and Banking, Vol. 36, No. 4 (Aug., 2004), pp. 801-825.
Balzs, H., & Rodolfo M. (2006). Monetary Transmission
Mechanisms in Belarus
(IMF working paper 06/246). Washington, DC: IMF.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp06246.pdf
Ben S. Bernanke and Mark Gertler, (1995), The Credit Channel of
Monetary Policy
Transmission, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No.
4
(Autumn, 1995), pp. 27-48
Bruno, M. and W. Easterly, (1998), Inflation crises and long-run
growth, Journal
of Monetary Economics, vol. 41, pp. 3-26.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
39
Bryant, R., Hooper, P., & Mann,C. (1993). Evaluating policy
regimes: new
empirical research in empirical macroeconomics. Washington,
D.C.:
Brookings Institution.
Cagan, Ph. (1956), The Monetary Dynamics of Hyperinflation, in
Friedman,
Milton (ed.), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money,
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Cagan, Phillip (1956), "The Monetary Dynamics of
Hyperinflation", 1956, Chicago,
University of Chicago Press
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. (1999). Monetary
policy shocks: what
have we learned and to what end? In M. Woodford and J Taylor
(Eds.),
Handbook of macroeconomics. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
Christopher A. Sims, (1980), Macroeconomics and Reality,
Econometrica, Vol. 48,
No. 1 (Jan., 1980), pp. 1-48.
Dornbusch, Rudiger, (1982), "PPP Exchange-Rate Rules and
Macroeconomic
Stability," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago
Press.
_________________, (2001, May). Fewer monies, better monies, The
American
Economic Review, 91(2), 238-242.
_________________, and Fischer, Stanley, (1993), "Moderate
Inflation," WB
Economic Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(1), pages
1-44.
Dwyer, G. and Hafer, R.W. (1999), Are Money Growth and Inflation
Still Related?
Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 2nd quarter
1999.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
40
Engle, R. F. and Granger, C.W.J, (1987). Co-integration and
error
correction: representation, estimation, and testing, Harvard
University
Press.
Eshag, E. (1971, June). The relative efficiacy of monetary
policy in selected
industrial and less-developed countries [Electronic version].
The
American Economic Review, 85(1), 219-239.
Fischer, S., Sahay, R., Carlos, A. Wgh, (1998) From Transition
to Market:
Evidence and Growth Prospects, IMF Working Paper, 1998.
Friedman in Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic
Review, (1977)
1977;pp. 13
Friedman interview in Chicago Daily News (1970) July 29,
1970
Friedman interview in New Zealand Herald (1981) (Wellington),
April 18, 1981
Friedman M. The only cure for inflation...: Friedman Newsweek
column,
November 12, 1979.
Friedman, Milton. 1992. Money Mischief: Episodes in Monetary
History. New
York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. pp.262.
Ganev, G., Molnar, K., Rybiski, K., Woniak, P. (2002).
Transmission mechanism
of monetary policy in Central and Eastern Europe, (CASE Report
No. 52).
Warsaw.
Gary Shelley, Frederick Wallace, (2005), The relation between
U.S. money growth
and inflation: evidence from a bandpass filter, Economics
Bulletin, Vol.
5, No. 8 pp. 113.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
41
George T. McCandless Jr., Warren E. Weber, (1995), Some Monetary
Facts,
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Vol. 19,
No. 3,
1995.
Ghatak, S., & Spanjers, W. (2007). Monetary policy rules in
transition economies:
The impact of ambiguity [Electronic version]. International
Journal of
Development Issues, 6(1), 26-37.
Golinelli, R., & Rovelli, R. (2002, August). Monetary policy
transmission, interest
rate rules and inflation targeting in three transition
countries. Ezoneplus
Working Paper No. 10.
Gregory, C. Chow, Yan Shen, (2004), Money, Price Level and
Output in the
Chinese Macro Economy, CEPS Working Paper No. 98, May 2004.
Hayo, B. (1999). Money-output Granger-causality revisited: An
empirical analysis
of EU countries. Applied Economics, 31(11), 14891501.
Hume, D. (1752) Essays, Moral, Political, and
Literature.[Electronic version].
Under the title of Political Discourses.
Hung, L., & Pfau, W. (2008, February). VAR analysis of the
monetary transmission
mechanism in Vietnam (Vietnam Development Forum Working
Paper
081).
John B. Taylor, (1995), The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: An
Empirical
Framework, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No.
4
(Autumn, 1995), pp. 11-26.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
42
Lszl Halpern, Charles Wyplozs, (1997), Equilibrium Exchange
Rates in
Transition Economies, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 44, No. 4, December
1997.
Mankiw, G. (2009). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Harvard University,
New York:
International Edition.
Milan Nikoli, (2000), Money GrowthInflation Relationship in
Postcommunist
Russia, Journal of Comparative Economics 28, 108133 (2000)
Milton Friedman & Anna Jacobson Schwartz, (1963), A Monetary
History of the
United States 1867-1960 [Electronic version], by National
Bureau-of
Economic Research, Princeton University Press US.
Mishkin, F. (2007). The economics of money, banking, and
financial markets
(Alternate Edition). Boston: Pearson International Edition.
Moser, G.G. (1995), The Main Determinants of Inflation in
Nigeria, IMF Staff
papers, 42, No.2, IMF, 1995.
Paul, S., C. Kearney and K. Chowdhury, (1997), Inflation and
economic growth: a
multi-country empirical analysis, Applied Economics, vol.
29.
Pazos Felipe, (1972), Chronic inflation in Latin America,
Praeger Publishers.
Peng, T.K. and Shanmugaratnam, T. (1992), Exchange Rate Policy:
Philosophy
and Conduct over the Past Decade, Times Academic Press,
285-314.
Phillips, P.C.B. and P. Perron, (1988), Testing for a unit root
in time series
regression, Biometrika, vol. 75, pp. 335-346.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
43
Poole, W. (1970, May). Optimal choice of monetary policy
instruments in a simple
stochastic macro model [Electronic version]. The Quarterly
Journal of
Economics, 84(2), 197-216.
Rafiq, M., & Mallick, S. (2008). The effect of monetary
policy on output in EMU3.
A sign restriction approach. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30,
17561791.
Robert Mundell, (1963), Inflation and Real Interest, The Journal
of Political
Economy, Vol. 71, No. 3 (Jun., 1963), pp. 280-283.
Robert, J. Barro, (1970), Inflation, the Payments Period and the
Demand for
Money, Journal of Political Economy, 78(6): 1228-1263.
______________, (1989), Economic Growth in a Cross section of
Countries,
NBER Working Paper, September 1989.
______________, (1995), Inflation and Economic Growth, NBER
Working Paper,
October 1995.
______________, (1996), Determinants of economic growth: a cross
country
empirical study, NBER Working Paper, August 1996.
______________, Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1995), Economic growth,
McGraw-Hill
advanced series in economics, New York 1995.
Roberto Gorinelli, Riccardo Rovelli, (2002), Monetary Policy
Transmission,
Interest Rate Rules and Inflation Targeting in Three Transition
Countries
Ezoneplus Working Paper No. 10, August 2002.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY
-
44
Sargent, Thomas J. (1977). The Demand for Money During
Hyperinflation under
Rational Expectations: I (PDF). International Economic Review,
18 (1):
5982. http://ideas.repec.org/e/psa83.html
Simon Commander, (1992), Inflation and Transition to a Market
Economy: An
Overview, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 6, No. 1
(Jan.,
1992), pp. 3-12
Starr, M. (2004, October). Does money matter in the CIS? Effects
of monetary
policy on output and prices. American University Working
Paper.
http:www.american.edu/cas/econ/workingpapers/200410-02.pdf.
Tun Wai, U., (1959), The relation between inflation and economic
development: a
statistical inductive study, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 7, pp.
302-317.
Uhlig, H. ( 2005). What are the effects of monetary policy on
output? Results from
an agnostic identification procedure. Journal of Monetary
Economics, 52,
381419.
Uzbekistan Economy, Statistical and Analytical Review for
2003-2008. State
Committee of Uzbekistan, Tashkent.
Wallich, Henry C., (1969), Keynesian Monetary Theories,
Stabilization Policy, and
the Recent Inflation: A Comment, Blackwell Publishing, pp.
590-99,
1969.
Wojciech Maliszewski, (2003), Modeling Inflation in Georgia, IMF
Working
Paper, 2003.
IUJ I
NTER
NAL U
SE O
NLY