Top Banner
Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines MEM 390 INTERNSHIP PRESENTATION Kofi Amoako-Gyan Sponsor: Greylock McKinnon Associates 09/20/2012 1 Picture: http://http://www.evwind.es/2012/09/10/wind-energy-could-meet- many-times-worlds-total-power-demand-by-2030/23205/
42

Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Aug 08, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Analysis of Industrial Wind TurbinesMEM 390 INTERNSHIP PRESENTATION

Kofi Amoako-GyanSponsor: Greylock McKinnon Associates

09/20/2012 1Picture: http://http://www.evwind.es/2012/09/10/wind-energy-could-meet-many-times-worlds-total-power-demand-by-2030/23205/

Page 2: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

The world demands more energy every year

2

Source: http://www.wikinvest.com/image/Worldenergy.gif

09/20/2012

Introduction

Page 3: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

The world demands more energy every year

3

Source: http://www.wikinvest.com/image/Worldenergy.gif

09/20/2012

Introduction

Page 4: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

The world demands more energy every year

4

Source: http://www.wikinvest.com/image/Worldenergy.gif

09/20/2012

Introduction

Page 5: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Industrial wind turbines(IWT) are powered by the wind

• Renewable Source• Zero emissions

509/20/2012

Introduction

• Expensive• Alleged health and safety concerns• Alleged negative effect on property values

Page 6: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Environmental concerns about wind energy are on the rise

6Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2071816/TOM-UTLEY-The-day-I-realised-Im-lonely-outsider-country.html09/20/2012

Introduction

Page 7: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Better siting criteria

Given both the benefits and the concerns raised about wind energy,

my 390 requirements was to come up with an appropriate siting criteria that suits both sides of the divide

709/20/2012

Introduction

Page 8: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

8

Review of Work

09/20/2012

Global installed capacity

Drivers for sustained IWT

installations

Onshore versus

offshore construction

Wind resource

assessmentEfficiency of IWTs

Economics of installation

Reported health issues

Introduction

Online Reporting criteria

Page 9: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

909/20/2012

Introduction

GLOBAL INSTALLED WIND POWER CAPACITY (MW) - REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION

End 2010

New 2011 End 2011

AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST Cape Verde 2 23 24

  Morocco 286 5 291

  Iran 90 3 91

  Egypt 550 - 550

  Other 137 - 137

  Total 1065 31 1093

Global Installed Capacity

Source: Global Wind Energy Council, Global Statistics,2011

Page 10: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

1009/20/2012

Introduction

Global Installed Capacity

ASIA

China 44,733 18,000 62,733

India 13,065 3,019 16,084

Japan 2,334 168 2,501

Taiwan 519 45 564

South Korea 379 28 407

Vietnam 8 29 30

Other 69 9 79

Total 61,107 21,298 82,398

Page 11: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

1109/20/2012

Introduction

Global Installed CapacityEUROPE Germany 27,191 2,086 29,060

Spain 20,623 1,050 21,674

France 5,970 830 6,800

Italy 5,797 950 6,747

UK 5,248 1,293 6,540

Portugal 3,706 377 4,083

Denmark 3,749 178 3,871

Sweden 2,163 763 2,970

Netherlands 2,269 68 2,328

Turkey 1,329 470 1,799

Ireland 1,392 239 1,631

Greece 1,323 311 1,629

Poland 1,180 436 1,616

Austria 1,014 73 1,084

Belgium 886 192 1,078

Rest Of Europe 2807 966 3,708

Total 86,647 10,282 96,618

Of which EU-27 84,650 9,616 93,957

Page 12: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

1209/20/2012

Introduction

Latin America & Caribbean Brazil 927 583 1,509

Mexico 519 354 873

Chile 172 33 205

Argentina 50 79 130

Costa Rica 119 13 132

Honduras - 102 102

Dominican Republic - 33 33

Caribbean 91 - 91

Others 118 10 128

Total 1,996 1,207 3,203

North America USA 40,298 6,810 46,919

Canada 4008 1267 5265

Total 44,306 8,077 52,184

Global Installed Capacity

Page 13: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

1309/20/2012

Introduction

Global Installed Capacity

Pacific Region

Australia 1,990 234 2,224

New Zealand 514 108 622

Pacific Islands 12 - 12

Total 2,516 342 2,858

World Total 197,637 41,237 238,354

Page 14: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Global Installed Capacity

09/20/2012 14

Industrial Wind

Turbine Capacity

Page 15: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Incentives and Subsidies

09/20/2012 15Source: KPMG, 2011, Taxes and Incentives for Renewable Energy

Page 16: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Incentives and Subsidies

09/20/2012 16Source: KPMG, 2011, Taxes and Incentives for Renewable Energy

Page 17: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

09/20/2012 17

Wind Potential Criteria

Resource Assessment

Page 18: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

09/20/2012 18

Wind Potential for the United States

Source: National Renewable Energy lab, DOE

Resource Assessment

Page 19: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

09/20/2012 19

Wind Exclusion Zones

Source: National Renewable Energy lab, DOE

Resource Assessment

Page 20: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

09/20/2012 20

Wind Potential for the United States

Source: National Renewable Energy lab, DOE

Resource Assessment

Page 21: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

09/20/2012 21

Offshore Wind Resource

Resource Assessment

Source: National Renewable Energy lab, DOE

Page 22: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

2209/20/2012

Offshore compared to onshore construction

Resource Assessment

Offshore Onshore

More wind offshore Relatively less wind

Restrictions: Shipping lanes, oil and gas platforms, military zones and conservations

Restrictions: Conservations, opposition from neighbors

Potential: 4,150,000 MW Potential: 10,400,000 MW

Lower Turbulence Relatively high turbulence

High Cost of construction Relatively low cost

Page 23: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

2309/20/2012

Continental US Wind Facts at a Glance

Resource Assessment

Source: American Wind Energy Association

Total U.S. Utility-Scale Wind Power

Capacity, Through 1st Quarter of 2012

48,611 MW

U.S. Wind Power Capacity, Installed in

2011

6,816 MW

U.S. Wind Power Capacity, Installed

in 1st Quarter of 2012

1,695 MW

U.S. Wind Power Capacity Under

Construction as of 1st Quarter of 2012

8,916 MW

U.S. Wind Power Capacity, Installed in Previous Years (including small-wind)

2010 5,216 MW

2009 10,010 MW

2008 8,366 MW

2007 5,258 MW

Page 24: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

2409/20/2012

Resource Assessment

Source: National Renewable Energy lab, DOE

Continental US Wind Facts at a GlanceNumber of States with Utility-Scale

Wind Installations, 2011

38

Number of States with over 1,000 MW

of Wind Installations, 2011

14

U.S. Wind Resource Potential, Onshore

(Source: NREL)

10,400,000 MW

U.S. Wind Resource Potential, Offshore

(Source: NREL)

4,150,000 MW

Top 5 States with Wind Power Capacity Installed, through Q1 2012

1. Texas 10,648 MW

2. Iowa 4,419 MW

3. California 4,287 MW

4. Illinois 2,852 MW

5. Minnesota2,718 MW

Page 25: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

http://www.nrel.gov/news/features/feature_detail.cfm/feature_id=1927

2509/20/2012

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Issues Regarding Site Selection

• . Land use restrictions or zoning issues, such as hunting rights, grazing rights, and cultural considerations limit the site

• Wildlife issues may also restrict construction due to avian and wildlife migration, spawning grounds, wetlands and surface water concerns

• Noise or visual impact restrictions may affect placement of turbines

Page 26: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10233108-54.html

2609/20/2012

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Transportation Logistics

Page 27: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

http://piximus.net/vehicles/transportation-of-the-giant-wind-turbine

2709/20/2012

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Transportation Logistics

Page 28: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

http://www.nhwag.co.uk/construction.htm

2809/20/2012

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Transportation Logistics

Page 29: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

09/20/2012 29

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Source: (University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Dept. of Aeronautical and Astronautical Eng)

Weather Limitations

Page 30: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

09/20/2012 30

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Weather LimitationsLow Temperature: The mechanical properties of structural elements such as steel and composite material change at low temperatures.

Steel becomes more brittle; its energy absorbing capacity and deformation prior to failure are both reduced

Low temperature also increases the stress on composites. The stress can result in micro-cracking.

These micro cracks reduce both the stiffness and the impermeability of the material, which can contribute to the deterioration process .

Snow: It can infiltrate almost any unprotected openings where airflow can find its way.

On the other hand, snow could also obstruct these openings and prevent normal circulation of air

Page 31: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3109/20/2012

Challenges of Turbine Decommissioning

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/pacific/print-edition/2011/04/29/unused-wind-farm-raises.html

Page 32: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3209/20/2012

Health Issues related to IWTs

Challenges of Wind

industry

The range of health grievances has previously not been described in any medical literature.

However , there have been an increase in the number of health related complaints made after the turbines are operational.

To the point that Health Canada has decided to study the possible connection between noise generated by the towering turbines and adverse health effects reported by people living close to them in conjunction with Statistics Canada.

Results to be published in 2014.

Examples of alleged symptoms : Severe chronic sleep deprivation, severe frequent headaches, tinnitus , ear pressure sensations , hyperacusis, nausea, motion sickness, vertigo symptoms, and balance disturbances, High blood pressure etc..

Page 33: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3309/20/2012

Property value Issues related to IWTs

Challenges of Wind

industry

While no national study has been done, An independent study

conducted by Appraisal Group One (AGO) accessed the existing

literature on wind turbine impact on sales, an opinion survey of

realtors to learn their take on the impact of wind turbines in their

sales area and a sales study which compared vacant residential lot

sales within the wind turbine farm area to comparable sales

located outside of the turbine influence.

Reduces by about 20-30%

AGO is an appraisal company specializing in forensic appraisal, eminent domain, stigmatized properties and valuation research.

Page 34: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3409/20/2012

Online Reporting System

Challenges of Wind

industry

Windturbineeffects.crowdmap.com

Page 35: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3509/20/2012

Challenges of Wind

industry

Online Reporting System

Page 36: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3609/20/2012

Challenges of Wind

industry

Online Reporting System

Page 37: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3709/20/2012

Challenges of Wind

industry

Online Reporting System

Page 38: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3809/20/2012

Driving Traffic to the Site

Challenges of Wind

industry

• Leveraging the diverse MEM class who are all on Facebook and twitter to spread word about the site.

• I have joined certain list serves that are both for and against wind turbines to spread word.

Page 39: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

3909/20/2012

Authenticity of Reports Submitted

Challenges of Wind

industry

The only safeguards now are:

• People’s integrity

• Fill out a form with your email address and location. Multiple reports from the same email address will be a red flag

Page 40: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

4009/20/2012

Choosing a site

Challenges of Wind

industry

1. Area with good wind resource2. Area with good transportation

system3. Area where snow and ice wont be

that big of an issue during the winter4. A place where there isn’t that much

opposition to the construction of wind turbines based on the global red flags that the online reporting system will generate.

Page 41: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

Acknowledgements• Prof. Graves, 390 Professor• Prof. Wegst, Faculty Advisor• Dr. Raymond Hartman, My boss at GMA • Dr. Richard Tabors• The Review Board

41

Thank you!

09/20/2012

Page 42: Analysis of Industrial Wind Turbines_Final Presentation

4209/20/2012

Efficiency of Installed Capacity

Capital and Power CostEstimated capital cost $1.5 million

Actual capital cost $2 million; an overrun of 33%

The project was financed by UM cash reserves and a $50,000 cash subsidy from the Maine Public Utilities Commission.

The estimated useful service life was about 20 years.Predicted power production: 1,000,000 kWh/yrPredicted capacity factor = 1,000,000 kWh/yr)/ (600 kW x 8,760 hr/yr) = 0.190 Actual power production after 1 year: 609,250 kWhActual capacity factor for 1 year = 609,250 kWh/yr/ (600 kW x 8,760 hr/yr) = 0.116; a shortfall of 39%

Value of power produced = 609,250 kWh/yr x $0.125/ kWh = $76,156/yr; if O&M and financing costs amortized over 20 years are subtracted, this value will likely be negative.