Top Banner
An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients
39

An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Jan 12, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

An Overview and Discussion of the Literature

2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients

Page 2: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

My apologies to Best Buy…

Page 3: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Educational Scholarship

• Clear Goals

• Adequate Preparation

• Appropriate Methods

• Significant Results

• Effective Presentation

• Reflective Critique

Glassick

Page 4: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Objectives

• Provide a guided discussion of the published literature from 2010 involving SPs

• Discuss the unique applications of SPs in teaching, assessment and research

• Guide participants through discussion on the potential application of findings to their own program

• Stimulate ideas for studies involving standardized patients.

Clear goals

Page 5: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Thinking ‘both this…

• Review Medline capabilities

• Decisions on limitations

• Skills in literature search

Adequate Preparation

Page 6: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Methods

Medline search

• MeSH descriptors:–Standardized patient(s)

–Simulated patient(s)

–OSCE

–Objective structured clinical examination

Limited to English language, 2010

Appropriate Methods

Page 7: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Results

• Initial result: – 427 papers– Titles scanned – Irrelevant papers discarded.

• Left with 423 articles • Reviewed all abstracts

Result was 154 articles

Significant Results

Page 8: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Which Journals? N=91

Medical Education

Medicine Osteopathic Med

Nursing Pharmacy

Allied Health Dentistry

Psychology Pastoral Care

Medical Informatics Nutrition

Page 9: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Location of Author

• Australia• Belgium• Brazil• Canada• Chile• France• Germany• India

• Iran• Israel• Italy• Japan• Korea• Malaysia• Netherlands• Nepal

• Pakistan• South Africa• Sweden• Switzerland• Taiwan• UK• USA

Page 10: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Questions to Ponder

• Unique aspect of the use of standardized patients is presented in the article

• Consider ways that the use of findings from current literature can enhance your program

• Do the papers presented offer ideas for further research?

Effective Presentation

Page 11: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Organizing the Chaos

• What do we do?

• Where do we do it?

• When do we do it?

• With whom do we do it?

• Why do we do it?

• How do we do it?

• What can we learn from the experience?

Page 12: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Categories

• Teaching / Assessment

• Communication skills / Feedback

• Logistics

• Impact of the SP experience

• Really Cool Stuff

Page 13: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Teaching vs Assessment

• Primary skills– Interview – Physical examination (neuro, MSK)– Specialized exams (GTA)– Skills (ultrasound)

• Special Concepts– Populations (geriatrics, pt with disability)– Topics (palliative care)– Situations (transitions of care, student to resident)– Delivery: by SP vs other

Page 14: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Academic Medicine

• Brown R, Graham C, Richerson N et al

• Evaluation of Medical Student Performance on Objective Structured Clinical Exams with Standardized Patients with and without Disabilities

Page 15: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Use of Assessment with SPs

• Outcome measures– Comparison of curricula– Comparison of training sites

• Special topics – Demonstration of knowledge– Critical thinking skills– Patient context– Challenging patient situations (say “no”)– Self assessment

Page 16: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Medical Education

• Yudkowsky R, Otaki J, Lowenstien T et al.

• A hypothesis-driven physical examination learning and assessment procedure for medical students: initial validity evidence

Page 17: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Communication Skills

• Motivational interviewing• Behavior change• Palliative care• Elderly with altered mental status• Persons with mental health issues (suicide)• Organ procurement • Bad news delivery• Adherence to medication

Page 18: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy

• Hartzler B, Beadnell B, Rosengren D et al

• Deconstructing Proficiency in Motivational Interviewing: Mechanics of Skilful Practitioner Delivery During Brief Simulated Encounters

Page 19: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Communication Skills

• Nonverbal communication

• Patient centered communication

• Professionalism

• Empathy

Page 20: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Patient Education and Counseling

• Thompson B, Teal C, Scott S et al

• Following the clues: Teaching Medical students to explore patient contexts

Page 21: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Annals of Internal Medicine

• Weiner S, Schwartz A, Weaver F et al

• Contextual Errors and Failures in Individualized Patient Care

Page 22: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

JAMA

• Schwartz A, Weiner S, Harris I, Binns-Calvey A.

• An Educational Intervention for Contextualizing Patient Care and Medical students’ Abilities to Probe for Contextual Issues in Simulated Patients

Page 23: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Academic Medicine

• Blatt B, LeLacheur S, Galinsky A

• Does Perspective-Taking Increase Patient Satisfaction in Medical Encounters?

Page 24: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Feedback

• Not much in 2010 on – Who should give it– How to give it – When to give it – Why to give it

Page 25: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Logistics

• Description of OSCE experience

• Build an OSCE

• Prepare for an OSCE

• Prepare a hybrid simulation

Page 26: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Logistics

• Validity studies

• Checklist development

• Comparison of scoring methods

• Repeat use of cases

• Post encounter scoring

• The “who” in scoring

• Gender issues

Page 27: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Medical Teacher

• Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M. Roberts T.

• How to Measure the Quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49

Just Read This

Page 28: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Medical Education

• Durning S, Artino A, Boulet J, et al

Making Use of Contrasting Participant Views of the Same Encounter

Page 29: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Medical Education

• Hettinga A, Denessen E, Postma C

Checking the Checklist: a content analysis of expert- and evidence-based case-specific checklist items.

Page 30: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Academic Medicine

• Swygert K, Muller E, Scott C, Swanson D

• The Relationship Between USMLE Step 2 CS Patient Note Ratings and Time Spent on the Note: So Examinees Who Spend More Time Write Better Notes?

Page 31: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Impact of SP experience

• Impact of experience on students

• Still not much on the SPs themselves– Can they?

• SP vs faculty

– Should they?• Role play vs SP• SP vs actual patients

– Guides for SPs

Page 32: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Academic Medicine

• Bokken L, Rethans JJ, Jobsis Q et al

Instructiveness of Real Patients and Simulated Patients in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Randomized Experiment

Page 33: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Simulation in Healthcare

• Nestel D, Clark S, Tabak D, et al

Defining Responsibilities of Simulated Patients in Medical Education

Page 34: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

International Journal of Psychophysiology

• Hulsman R, Pranger S, Koot S et al

How stressful it doctor-patient communication? Physiological and psychological stress of medical students in simulated history taking and bad-news consultations

Page 35: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Really Cool Stuff

• Faculty Development– Skills as raters– Development of skills – Reentry to practice

Page 36: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

American Journal of Gastroenterology

• Alevi D, Baiocco PJ, Chokhavatia S et al.

• Teaching the competencies: using observed structured clinical examinations for faculty development

Page 37: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

Academic Medicine

• Kogan J, Hess B, Conforti L, Holmboe E

• What Drives Faculty Ratings of Residents’ Clinical Skills? The Impact of Faculty’s Own Clinical Skills

Page 38: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

It’s a depth of field issue….

B

E

C

U

R

I

O

U

S

A

S

K

*

*

R

E

A

D

Reflective Critique

Page 39: An Overview and Discussion of the Literature 2010 Publications Involving Standardized Patients.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

www.utmb.edu/oed

• Once you open the OED home page, go to “standardized patient “ section.

• Go to subheading “bibliography”