Top Banner
Henrique Araújo Imperial College London IOP2010 – JOINT HEPP/APP GROUP MEETING 29-31 March 2010, University College London
31

AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Jan 09, 2016

Download

Documents

KYLee

AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches. Henrique Araújo Imperial College London IOP2010 – JOINT HEPP/APP GROUP MEETING 29-31 March 2010, University College London. What are we looking for?. Scalar (SI) and axial-vector (SD) c -N interactions (neutral current exchange):. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Henrique AraújoImperial College London

IOP2010 – JOINT HEPP/APP GROUP MEETING29-31 March 2010, University College London

Page 2: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

What are we looking for?• WIMPs attract most experimental effort,

but axion searches are a growth industry

• I assume here that the Lightest SUSY Particle

is the neutralino, , which is a great WIMP

• WIMPs should scatter off ordinary nuclei

producing measurable nuclear recoils

• But, essentially, WIMP searches are not really (PP-)model dependent…

type spin mass

Axion 0 eV – 10 meV

Axino LSP 1/2 eV - GeV

Inert Higgs Doublet 0 50 GeV

Sterile Neutrino 1/2 keV

Neutralino LSP 1/2 10 GeV -10 TeV

Gravitino LSP 3/2 eV - TeV

Kaluza-Klein UED 1 TeV

• Scalar (SI) and axial-vector (SD) -N interactions(neutral current exchange):

2H. Araújo

Page 3: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Low energy nuclear recoils

• Elastic scatter off nucleus:– Decreasing, featureless spectrum of low-energy recoils (<~50 keV)– Rate depends on target mass & spin, WIMP mass & spin, DM halo, …– Neutrons are irreducible background

• Inelastic scatter off nucleus: – Short-lived, low-lying excited states (easier signature?)– 129Xe(3/2+→1/2+) + (40 keV), 73Ge(5/2+→9/2+)(13 keV)

– Neutrons are irreducible background

• Inelastic dark matter (iDM):– “particles will scatter at DAMA but not at CDMS” (Smith & Weiner 2001)

– Recoil spectrum with threshold (mass splitting, )– Neutrons are irreducible background

NN

NN

NN *

3H. Araújo

Page 4: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Elastic scattering ratesCanonical model: not great, but we’re all in this together:• Isothermal sphere (no lumps), ∝ r−2

• Local density 0~0.3 GeV/c2/cm3 (~1/pint at 100 GeV)

• Maxwellian (gaussian) velocity distribution• Characteristic velocity v0=220 km/s,• Local escape velocity vesc=600 km/s• Earth velocity vE=232 km/s

thE

RR

dEdE

dRR

max

min

322

0 )()(

2

v

vA

A

R

vdv

vfqF

mdE

dR

1)(

4,

2/

0

0 0

TW

TWrEE

R mm

mmre

rE

R

dE

dRR

RdE

dR

REthE 4H. Araújo

Page 5: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Elastic scattering rates• Coupling to protons and neutrons more useful than coupling to nucleus

• To compare different target materials, indirect searches, LHC results

• Spin-independent (scalar) interaction

– note A2 in enhancement factor

– cMSSM-favoured XS within reach of current detectors

• Spin-dependent (axial-vector) interaction

– note J (nuclear spin) instead of A2 enhancement

– cMSSM-favoured XS out of reach for the time being…

22

2

)0( Aq pp

ASIA

2

,2

2 1

3

4)0( nnpp

SDnp

p

ASDA SaSa

J

Jq

5H. Araújo

Page 6: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

SI scattering rates for 1 kg targets

6H. Araújo

Page 7: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

The experimental challenge• Low-energy particle detection is easy ;)

E.g. Microcalorimetry with Superconducting TES

Detection of keV particles/photons with eV FWHM!

• Rare event searches are also easy ;)

E.g. Super-Kamiokande contains 50 kT water

Cut to ~20 kT fiducial mass (self-shielding)

• But doing both is hard!Small is better for collecting signal

Large is better for background

• Ah: and there is no trigger…7H. Araújo

Page 8: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Building a WIMP detector• Consider 1 kg target

Sensitive to Edep>1 keV

• Expected WIMP rates – 0.1−0.000001 evt/day

• However…

• Cosmic rays, -rays– >1,000,000 evt/day

• Neutrons are THE background!– Several evt/day

1 kg

n

WIMP

8H. Araújo

Page 9: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Building a WIMP detector

• Move underground

• Use radio-pure materials

• Shield external -rays

• Shield external neutrons

• Actively veto neutrons

• Discriminate e-recoils (, ) from n-recoils (WIMPs, n)

WIMP

9H. Araújo

Page 10: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Nuclear recoils - backgrounds• Nuclear recoils – same signature

– Neutrons from (,n) and SFission from U/Th trace contamination• Laboratory walls, shields, vessels, components, target material

– Neutrons from atmospheric muon spallation• Difficult to shield completely even underground

– Recoils from alpha emitters (e.g. Rn-222 and progeny)• Contaminating active target bulk/surfaces, air, etc

– Eventually, even coherent neutrino scattering

• Electron recoils – discrimination power is limited– Gamma-ray background external to target

• K-40, Cs-137, U/Th from walls, shields, vessels, components

– Contamination of target bulk and surfaces• U/Th betas and gammas (Pb-214, Bi-214, Pb-210,…)• Cosmogenic (Ge-68, Ge-71,…), anthropogenic (Kr-85, Cs-137,…)

10H. Araújo

Page 11: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Nuclear recoils - signal acceptance• Neutron elastic scattering populates WIMP acceptance region

– Calibration of detection efficiency with Am-Be (,n), Cf-252 (SF), D-D, D-T

• But there are complications:– Multi-element: in CaWO4 (CRESST), WIMPs couple mainly to heaviest material (W), but

neutrons scatter mainly off lightest (O). Signal acceptance must be calibrated indirectly– Quenching factor: in noble liquids (ZEPLIN,XENON,WARP,ARDM,…) conversion from

“electron-equivalent” to nuclear recoil energy is not straightforward (or favourable…)– Droplets: in C4F10 superheated droplets (SIMPLE,PICASSO) phase transition is independent

of energy. Calibration of signal acceptance threshold only

nR EA

AE 2

2cos

)1(

4

En

ER

En’

incomingneutron

nuclearrecoil

laboratory system

100 GeV WIMP on Xe (A=131):• 220 km/s WIMP → ER,max = 40 keV

• 1 MeV neutron → ER,max = 30 keV

11H. Araújo

Ge (CDMS-II)

Page 12: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Discrimination: single channels

Hphon

ons

ionisationQ

L

scintillation

ScintillatorsTargets: NaI, Xe, Ar

ANAIS, CLEAN, DAMA, DEAP, KIMS, LIBRA,

NAIAD, XMASS, ZEPLIN-I

Ionisation DetectorsTargets: Ge, Si, CS2, CdTe

CoGeNT, DRIFT, GENIUS,HDMS, IGEX, NEWAGE

BolometersTargets: Ge, Si, Al2O3, TeO2

CRESST-I, CUORE, CUORICINO

Bubbles & DropletsCF3Br, CF3I, C3F8, C4F10

COUPP, PICASSO, SIMPLE12H. Araújo

Page 13: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Heat & Ionisation BolometersTargets: Ge,Si

CDMS, EDELWEISScryogenic (<50 mK)

Light & Heat BolometersTargets: CaWO4, BGO, Al2O3

CRESST, ROSEBUDcryogenic (<50 mK)

Light & Ionisation Detectors

Targets: Xe, ArArDM, LUX, WARP,

XENON, ZEPLINcold (LN2)

All 3 hybrid technologies> 99.9% discrimination @ >10 keV NR energy

Hphon

ons

ionisationQ

L

scintillation

Discrimination: hybrid detectors

13H. Araújo

Page 14: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Phonons (microcalorimetry)

Superconducting Transition-Edge Sensor (as in CDMS)

• Collect high-frequency (athermal) phonons from particle interaction• Into superconducting Al contacts (threshold 2Al~ meV)• Quasiparticles from broken Cooper pairs diffuse into a W TES• SQUID readout offers extremely high sensitivity• Channel threshold: 1 keV for Ge & Si nuclear recoils

C

ET max

Thermal phonon signal is lost with increasing mass: must collect phonons before they thermalise in absorber

J. Cooley, CDMS Collaboration

Cryogenic: T0~50 mK

14H. Araújo

Page 15: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Scintillation (photomultipliers)

Scintillation detectors (as in DAMA)

• Best photomultipliers now approaching 50% quantum efficiency• Best NaI(Tl) crystals yield ~90 photons/keV for gamma rays• Typically require coincidence of two photomultipliers (2 phe)• Threshold: 0.3-3 keV for I nuclear recoils (depending on “channelling” effect)

NaI, CsI, CaWO4, LXe, LAr: many materials scintillate…Photomultipliers: ancient vacuum tube technology, but no-one has come up with a better alternative yet(and we’re trying…)

Room temperature, cold or cryogenic

DAMA/LIBRA Collaboration

15H. Araújo

Page 16: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Ionisation (Electroluminescence, TES, HEMT, JFET)

Two-phase xenon detectors (as in ZEPLIN)

• Strong electric field across liquid-gas xenon target• Collect ionisation from particle track in liquid Xe• Drift up to surface, then emit into vapour phase• Electroluminescence photons detected with photomultipliers• Threshold: 0.2 keV for Xe nuclear recoils

Difficult to measure one electron, but not so hard to measure electroluminescence photons from one electron

Cold: T0~200 K

Edwards et al., Astroparticle Phys. 30 (2008) 54

(electroluminescence) S2

1e

16H. Araújo

Page 17: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

A few examples(not comprehensive and somewhat UK-centric)

17H. Araújo

Page 18: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

3 events observed in10-40 keVnr acceptance region 48 kg·days exposure (2007)Angloher et al, Astropart. Phys. 31 (2009) 270

CRESST: Scintillation & PhononsTarget: 0.6 kg CaWO4

18H. Araújo

Page 19: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

ZEPLIN-III: Scintillation & Ionisation

7 events observed in10-30 keVnr acceptance region 850 kg·days raw exposure (2008)(likely e-recoil background)Lebedenko et al, PRD 80 (2009) 052010

Target: 12 kg LXe

19H. Araújo

Page 20: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

CDMS-II: Ionisation & Phonons

J. Cooley, CDMS Collaboration

2 events observed in10-100 keVnr acceptance region612 kg·days exposure (2007-08)Background estimate 0.8±0.2!Ahmed et al, arXiv:0912.3592

Target: 4.4 kg Ge, 1.1 kg Si

20H. Araújo

Page 21: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

DAMA/LIBRA: ScintillationTarget: 250 kg NaI(Tl)

8.9 CL modulationover 13 annual cyclesBarnabei et al, arXiv:1002.1028

(But what is modulated?and is it getting smaller?)

21H. Araújo

Page 22: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

DRIFT – NI Gas TPC

2

0

mincos)(exp

)(cos v

vvv

ddE

dR E

R

Target: 167 g/m3 CS2 (now CS2+CF4)

Unlikely that backgrounds mimic signal which appears as forward/backward asymmetry in galactic coordinates

22H. Araújo

Page 23: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

PICASSO: Superheated C4F10Target: 65+69 g C4F10

23H. Araújo

Page 24: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

CoGeNT - Ionisationp-type point contact (PPC) HPGe

Excess at low energies – a glimmer?Aalseth et al, arXiv:1002:4703v2)

No discrimination, too close to threshold…

H. Araújo 24

Target: 330 g Ge

Page 25: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

World status & prospects (SI)

25H. Araújo

Page 26: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

World status & prospects (SD)

26H. Araújo

Page 27: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

World status & prospects (iDM)

27H. Araújo

Schmidt-Hoberg & Winkler, JCAP09(2009)010

Akimov et al., arXiv:1003.5626 (ZEPLIN-III)

Page 28: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Next generation: a viewTWO-PHASE ARGON A=40, <ER>= 13 keV @50 GeV/c2, 35 keV @500 GeV/c2

very scalable (cheap, large LAr systems demonstrated) poor energy threshold, low atomic weight, Ar-39 background WARP, ArDM, (DEAP/CLEAN) working on 0.1—1 tonne targets 5-tonne system within 5 years is (optimistically) possible

CRYOGENIC GERMANIUM A=73, <ER>= 13 keV @50 GeV/c2, 57 keV @500 GeV/c2

excellent energy resolution, excellent discrimination difficult to scale (small detector modules, <50 mK cryostats) CDMS, EDELWEISS, (CRESST) working on 10—20 kg targets EURECA and SuperCDMS propose ~100 kg target in 5 years

TWO-PHASE XENON A=131, <ER>= 11 keV @50 GeV/c2, 85 keV @500 GeV/c2

scalable, low threshold control of xenon purity to <ppb is demanding ZEPLIN-III, XENON100, LUX350, (XMASS), working on 10-100 kg XENON1T and LUX-ZEPLIN propose 1 tonne two-phase xenon targets

28H. Araújo

Proposals (>1 tonne)

CDEX, CLEAN, COUPP+, DAMA+, DARKSIDE, DARWIN, DEAP3600, DRIFT, EURECA, GEODM, KIMS+, LUX-ZEPLIN, MAX, SuperCDMS, XMASS, …

Page 29: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Next generation: a view

Araujo, S

trigari & T

rotta

Araujo, S

trigari & T

rotta

29H. Araújo

Page 30: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Ready to scale up!

• UK pioneered several search technologies – NaIAD, ZEPLIN-I, DRIFT-I, CRESST-I, ZEPLIN-II, DRIFT-II,

CRESST-II, ZEPLIN-III, ArDM, EDELWEISS, (EURECA, LZ)

• And pushed forward “underground science”– Dating back to Holborn Station Laboratory…– Creating the Boulby Underground Laboratory

(see Sean Paling’s talk tomorrow)

• But we’re running out of road…

30H. Araújo

Pack ?

Page 31: AN EXPERIMENTAL OVERVIEW OF Direct Dark Matter Searches

Click to add funding

Thank you