2008:132 CIV MASTER'S THESIS An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London Clas Persson Luleå University of Technology MSc Programmes in Engineering Mechanical Engineering Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering Division of Energy Engineering 2008:132 CIV - ISSN: 1402-1617 - ISRN: LTU-EX--08/132--SE
205
Embed
An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
This thesis is the work conducted by Clas Persson at Hoare Lea Consulting.
I would like to thank the following people. Phil Dow for letting me write my master thesis at
Hoare Lea Consulting. James Ford my supervisor and mentor at Hoare Lea Consulting foralways taking time to answer questions and continuously helping out with the report.
I would also like to thank my girlfriend and my family in Sweden for their support.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Preface ................................................................................................................................... I Abstract ................................................................................................................................. II Table of Content ................................................................................................................... III 1. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1
1.1 Current situation ...........................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Objectives .........................................................................................................2
2. Methodology and Problem description ................................................................................3 3. THE LOTS ROAD SITE ....................................................................................................5
3.1 The Site ........................................................................................................................6 3.2 Overview North and South side .................................................................................7 3.3 Rule of Thumb ..........................................................................................................8 3.4 Energy demand and emissions ..................................................................................9 3.4.1 Energy demand ......................................................................................................9 3.4.2 Carbon dioxide emissions.......................................................................................9
4. Energy systems ................................................................................................................. 10 4.1 Biomass ...................................................................................................................... 11
5 Evaluations and system selections .................................................................................. 25 5.1 Evaluation Matrixes .................................................................................................... 26 5.2 Energy system evaluation ................................................. .......................................... 29
5.2.1 Wind power ......................................................................................................... 29 5.2.2 Biomass ............................................................................................................... 30 5.2.3 Combined Heat and Power ................................................................................... 31 5.2.4 Biomass CHP ....................................................................................................... 32 5.2.5 Solar Water Heating ............................................................................................. 33 5.2.6 Photovoltaic ......................................................................................................... 34 5.2.7 Ground Source Heating ........................................................................................ 35
5.3 Energy system selection .............................................................................................. 36 5.3.1 Discussion ......................................................................................... ................... 36
5.4 Energy centre .............................................................................................................. 37 5.4.1 Energy system evaluation for an energy centre. .......... .......................................... 37 5.5 Sustainable design systems .................... ................................................................. 38 5.5.1 Selection of sustainable design systems ................................................................ 38
6 Energy Strategy ............................................................................................................. 60 6.1 Lots Road Energy demand .......................................................................................... 60 6.2 Energy Strategy Option A ........................................................................................... 61
6.2.1 Evaluation Option A .................................................. .......................................... 62 6.2.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Option A ......................................................... 63 6.2.4 Option A energy distribution ................................................................................ 65 6.2.5 Decision ........................................ ....................................................................... 66
6.3 Reviewing Option A ................................................................................................... 67
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
6.4 Option B ..................................................................................................................... 68 6.4.1 The final recommendation .................................................................................... 68 6.4.2 Biomass ............................................................................................................... 69 6.4.3 Solar water heating............................................................................................... 70 6.4.4 Control of delivered thermal energy .................................................. ................... 70 6.4.5 Photovoltaic ......................................................................................................... 71 6.4.6 Control of delivered electrical energy ................................................................... 71 6.4.7 Backup ................................................................................................................. 72 6.4.8 Target 50 % CO2 reduction ................................................................................... 73 6.4.9 Placement of energy systems on the Lots Road site .............................................. 74
7 Schematics and Drawings .............................................................................................. 77 7.1 Legend Explanation ................................................................................................ 80 7.2 Schematics Explanation .......................................................................................... 81 7.2.1 Solar water heating............................................................................................... 81 7.2.2 Biomass and gas boilers ....................................................................................... 82
7.3 Drawings .................................................................................................................... 83 7.3.1 Explanation of electrical distribution .................................................................... 83 7.3.2 Explanation of thermal distribution ...................................................................... 84 7.3.3 Explanation of residential unit connection ............................................................ 85
List of Figures .................................................................................................................. 89 List of Tables. ............................................................................................................... 90
References ........................................................................................................................ 91 Appendix A1-A1.7 & A2-A2.2: Energy Systems & Sustainable Design Systems………..…93
When earth absorbs the energy delivered from the sun it emits thermal energy and this is what
heats the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and it helps to keep the earth’ssurface warm because it traps thermal energy, similar to a greenhouse, trying to leave the
atmosphere. Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are increasing and one reason to the increase
are the carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuel. [1]
Increase of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere will raise the temperature in the atmosphere and
will therefore add to global warming. This can disturb earth’s eco system and is a global
problem. [2]
The UK is now trying to decrease its emission of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. One
major part of carbon dioxide emissions in the UK are from fossil fuelled energy providing
heat and electricity to buildings. Buildings are responsible for 50 % of the carbon dioxide
emissions in the UK. [3] In order to decrease emissions the building regulation target are set
to a 20% carbon dioxide reduction from 2002 standards for new dwelling developments.[4]
New developments in London also have guidelines from the London planning toolkit and
from the Mayor of London’s energy strategy. This is to make London more energy efficient
and to lower London’s carbon dioxide emissions. London’s energy consumption is currently
higher then Irelands. [5]
The Lots Road site is a residential scheme being developed in London and has approximately
700 residential flats. The energy strategy will provide heat and electricity to the residents with
significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions compared to fossil fuelled energy. This will
decrease the greenhouse gas released into the atmosphere.
One alternative to achieve this is by renewable energies. Renewable energies do not add to the
increase of greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. There are several different types of renewable
energies such as photovoltaic, biomass and wind power. Another alternative to increase
energy efficiency and decrease emissions is to use combined heat and power (CHP). Natural
gas fired CHP will provide carbon dioxide emission savings and increase energy efficiency.
Renewable energy fuelled CHP exists but is still a relatively new technology in the UK.
As mentioned there are several energy systems to choose from but unfortunately urban areas
such as the Lots Road site are limited with renewable energy resources, for example the
amount of sunlight and wind speed available. This reduces the possibility to harvest
renewable energy onsite.
The task for this thesis is to recommend an energy strategy so the Lots Road site will have
low carbon dioxide emissions by utilizing a feasible substitute to fossil fuelled energy.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The Lots Road site is a residential scheme in London providing approximately 700 private
residences in total. The scheme is being designed by Sir Terry Farrell architects and is a
building site adjacent to the Thames and Chelsea Harbour. The central feature of the project is
the conversion of the decommissioned power station which is around 105 years old and willbe converted into residential flats around a central atrium/street.
For this thesis boundary conditions (BC) are set for the Lots Road site. They are for
modification of the architectural design and are guidelines for when designing the energy
strategy.
This is important for the report since there are no other restrictions to the site. The boundary
conditions will help to focus on how to provide low carbon dioxide emission energy to the
buildings.
This is instead of focusing on building design and how to lower the energy demand for the
buildings. This is for example designing buildings to prevent heat gain. This is also important
but not a focus for this report.
The Lots Road site is as shown in the architectural drawings 2001[6] and the boundary
conditions solely set for this thesis are:
Can
• Add floors to buildings.
• Determine “best” usage of all internal area.
• Add buildings over ground as long as they are not directly connected to any of the
blocks and space, on the site, is available.
• Add buildings under ground they can be connected to block or blocks as long as spaceis available.
Can Not
• Raise new buildings for residential, office or retail purpose.
• Remove any of the proposed blocks for the site.
• Add floors to blocks under ground for residential, office or retail purpose.
• Add floors to blocks over ground.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The total energy demand is calculated from adding all the nine blocks energy demand on the
Lots Road site. The total energy demand calculation is shown in appendix B9 page 191. TheLots Road sites energy demand is estimated to 13000MWh/year. Heat loss factors in the
energy system when delivering energy to the buildings have not been investigated in this
report.
The thermal and electrical proportion of the total energy demand is estimated, from appendix
B9 pages 181-191, to 8500MWh/year for the thermal demand and to 4500MWh/year for the
electrical demand.
3.4.2 Carbon dioxide emissions
The carbon dioxide emissions for the Lots Road site with energy generated from fossil fuels
are calculated below. Natural gas is assumed as fuel to provide the thermal energy and with
electricity delivered from the grid. This report has not investigated the carbon dioxide
emissions that will be emitted during fuel delivery.
The gas boiler efficiency is determined to 78% and will therefore increase the thermal CO2
emissions. The efficiency data is from the notional building data in SAP 2005 [10].
Carbon dioxide conversion factors to calculate the emissions are provided from BSRIA. It is
for natural gas 0.194(CO2 kg/kWh) [11] and for electricity from the grid 0.4222(CO2 kg/kWh)[12]. The emission conversion factors are multiplied with the energy demand per year to get
the kg CO2 emitted per year.
The total carbon dioxide emissions are calculated by multiplying the conversion factors with
the thermal and the electrical demand.
(8500000(kWh/year) / 0.78) x 0.194(CO2kg/kWh) + 4500000(kWh/year) x
0.4222(CO2kg/kWh) = 4013102.564 CO2 kg/year Equation (2)
The project objective target is to achieve a 50% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. From
Equation (2) a 50% reduction is approximately 2000 ton/year CO2.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The following are brief descriptions of different energy systems. Each energy system has a
short system description and sections of Carbon dioxide (CO2) efficiency, Urban placement,
Planning permission, Availability and Cost. Below are brief explanations of the different
sections.
Carbon dioxide reduction is investigated for the energy systems. The carbon dioxide emission
reduction is calculated from replacing approximately 20% of the sites total energy usage with
the evaluated energy system. The reduction is shown in the Carbon dioxide section for each
system. Utilizing 20% of renewable energies on the Lots Road site is a realistic energy target
and has been chosen here only as an example to compare carbon dioxide savings for the
different energies.
The energy systems are evaluated on if they are difficult or easy to implement in an urban
area. The evaluation considers for example system physical size compared to the energy
output achieved. The evaluation is carried out in the Urban placement section.
It is important with well established and available energy systems when implementing them
onsite because it increases reliability and lowers the need for backup. The Availability section
evaluates how established the energy systems are in the UK.
In order to develop a scheme it is essential to get planning permission. The Planning
permission section investigates the possibility for an energy system to get planning
permission.
Cost is not of a high priority to this report but the capital cost is calculated for a set energy
output for all energy systems. The cost can be seen in the Cost section for each energy system
and the calculations are shown in appendix B5 on page 173. The energy output,1500MWh/year, is chosen here only for cost comparisons between the different energy
systems. The selection of 1500MWh/year is on the basis that any selected energy output per
year will have the same outcome. For example if PV has the highest capital cost for
1500MWh/year it will have the highest cost for any selected energy output per year.
The energy systems chosen, explained and evaluated here are the ones that are the most
suitable for the Lots Road site. More energy systems have been evaluated and excluded from
this section they are shown in appendix A1.7 on pages 146-150.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Biomass CHP is a combined heat and power plant utilizing biomass fuel and is considered to
be a renewable energy source. The net CO2 emissions released into the atmosphere is zero.
Biomass combined heat and power uses biomass to generate thermal energy. The thermalenergy drives a generator which generates electricity and is utilized in thermal applications.
More information on biomass CHP is shown in appendix A1.2 on page 107.
4.2.1 Carbon efficiency
Carbon dioxide reduction is investigated for biomass CHP when utilizing it for 20% of the
Lots Road sites energy demand. The 20% are chosen only for CO2 reduction comparison
between the different energy systems. The reduction in CO2 emissions is then 21.1%.
Emissions for fuel delivery to end user are not considered for the 21.3% reduction. The
biomass CHP system is for this thesis considered to have a power to heat ratio of 1:1.286. [15]
The biomass CHP system will then deliver 1.286 units of heat for every unit of electricity
produced.
The CO2 reduction comparison matrix is shown in Table 2 and the CO2 emission calculations
are shown in appendix B4.2 on page 171.
4.2.2 Urban placement
From the research in this thesis it is considered unreliable to utilize biomass CHP to deliveronsite energy for a residential scheme in the UK. No biomass CHP was found, except test
plants, being used in an urban areas delivering energy onsite. It is a promising technology
working in a basement or in an energy centre. Biomass CHP could deliver heat and power to
residents but the biomass fuel supply and storage space needs to be investigated.
4.2.3 Planning permission
Considering planning permission for biomass CHP is similar to CHP. Biomass CHP would
have a small visual intrusion placed in a basement or in a separate building. The biomass CHPengine would require an external flue that would terminate above the roof of the building. The
biomass CHP system and flue should be designed to be unobtrusive in order to obtain
planning permission. [13]
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Ground source heating systems utilize the grounds natural thermal conductivity to extract
geothermal energy to the heat pump. The thermal energy extracted is then elevated by the heat
pump to a level were it can be used for thermal applications in the building. The heat pump is
considered to be an electrical heat pump for this thesis. The GSH system is therefore not arenewable process since the electricity for the pump is delivered from the grid.
The heat pump is assumed to have a coefficient of performance of 4; one unit of electricity
delivers four units of heat.
More information is shown in the GSH section in appendix A1.3 on pages 111-122.
4.4.1 Carbon efficiency
Carbon dioxide reduction is investigated for a ground source heating system when utilizing
GSH for 20% of the Lots Road sites energy demand. The 20% are chosen here only for CO2
reduction comparison between the different energy systems. The reduction in CO2 emissions
is then 9.3%.
The CO2 reduction comparison matrix is shown in Table 2 and the CO2 emission calculations
are shown in appendix B4.4 on page 171.
4.4.2 Urban placement
An evaluation on implement GSH in an urban area was completed.
The key points for implementing GSH are that it can provide thermal energy to buildings inurban areas and that it can utilize different sources to extract energy.
It can for example be designed to extract heat from the river Thames which is located near by
the Lots Road site.
From the London toolkit GSH used in large building will only be utilized to provide a
proportion of the thermal demand [20] because of the long pipe length needed for larger
thermal loads.
4.4.3 Planning permission
Investigation for GSH to obtain planning permission when being implemented on the Lots
Road site was carried out.
The key points are that the visual intrusion for GSH is negligible as it can not be seen from
the outside and that the system is mainly underground with the heat pump in the building.
GSH can therefore be designed to be unobtrusive for the residents to obtain planning
permission. Implementing GSH can require pre-drilling for boreholes (vertical system) to
evaluate the drilling conditions.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Photovoltaic utilize the energy from the sun to create electricity. It is the Semiconductors in
the PV panels that convert the suns energy into electricity. Photovoltaic do not release any
carbon dioxide emissions and is a renewable energy source. The photovoltaic panels are
usually placed on the roof, in an angle or flat, facing a southerly direction to absorb as muchenergy as possible.
There are different types of semiconductors and the efficiency varies. Mono crystalline silicon
semiconductors delivers electricity with 15% efficiency, this is one of the highest efficiencies
commercially available. There is also for example the polycrystalline semiconductor which
has a 10% efficiency.
More information is shown in the photovoltaic section in appendix A1.5 on pages 130-136.
4.5.1 Carbon efficiency
Carbon dioxide reduction is investigated for photovoltaic when utilizing PV panels for 20% of
the Lots Road sites energy demand. From the roof space calculation in appendix B2on page
167 there is not enough roof space for PV to generate the 20% energy demand. It is chosen
here only for CO2 reduction comparison between the different energy systems. The reduction
in CO2 emissions is then 27.4%.
The CO2 reduction comparison matrix is shown in Table 2 and the CO2 emission calculations
are shown in appendix B4.5 on page 172.
.
4.5.2 Urban placement
An evaluation on implementing PV in an urban area was completed.
The key points for implementing photovoltaic is the low energy efficiency and it is therefore
difficult to find enough roof space to implant PV panels in order to generate energy. For
example to generate 10% of the Lots Road sites energy demand would require 16000 m2
of
roof space. Maximum roof space available on site from the roof space calculations in
appendix B2 on page 167 is 4100 m2. Finding enough external space to deliver a high amount
of PV electricity is therefore considered impossible.
In order to get an energy efficient PV system it is important to have the PV panels unshadedat all times. They should also be facing in a southerly direction to efficiently absorb the
energy from the sun. The PV efficiency is therefore depending on the roof angle and direction
of the building. Photovoltaic could be placed on the façade but that would lower the
efficiency further.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Solar water heating panels absorbs the energy from the sun to generate thermal energy. It does
not emit carbon dioxide emissions and is a renewable energy source. Collectors are used in
order to collect thermal energy. The two main types are the flat plate collector which utilize a
black absorber plate and the evacuated tube collector which is using black coating on theevacuated tubes. The SWH collector is usually placed on the roof, flat or in an angle, facing in
a southerly direction to absorb as much energy as possible.
More information is shown in the SWH section in appendix A1.4 on pages 123-129.
4.6.1 Carbon efficiency
Carbon dioxide reduction is investigated for solar water heating when utilizing SWH for 20%
of the Lots Road sites energy demand. From the roof space calculation in appendix B2 on
page 167 there is not enough roof space for SWH to generate the 20% energy demand. It is
chosen here only for CO2 reduction comparison between the different energy systems. The
reduction in CO2 emissions is then 16.2%.
The CO2 reduction comparison matrix is shown in Table 2 and the CO2 emission calculations
are shown in appendix B4.6 on page 172.
4.6.2 Urban placement
An evaluation on implementing solar water heating in an urban area was completed.
The key points are that SWH panels on the roofs of the Lots Road site can supply a part of thethermal energy demand but has an unreliable winter performance. Solar water heating panels
therefore needs to be complemented with other energy systems.
In order to be energy efficient the SWH panel should be unshaded at all times and facing in a
southerly direction. This can be difficult in an urban area and is depending on the roof angle
and elevation of the building.
4.6.3 Planning permission
Investigation for SWH to obtain planning permission when being implemented on the Lots
Road site was carried out.
To obtain planning permission the visual impact should be minimised. This is instead of being
design as a visual renewable energy statement [13]. Solar water heating panels can for
example be implemented to look like a roof window.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Wind power is a renewable energy technology and uses the kinetic energy in the wind to
generate electricity. The blades are shaped like an airplane wing and utilize the aerodynamic
forces to rotate. Via an electric generator the wind turbine is then able to create electricity.
More information is shown in the wind power section in appendix A1.6 on pages 137-145.
4.7.1 Carbon efficiency
Carbon dioxide reduction is investigated for wind power when utilizing it for 20% of the Lots
Road sites energy demand. The 20% are chosen here only for CO2 reduction comparison
between the different energy systems. The reduction in CO2 emissions is then 27.4%.
The CO2 reduction comparison matrix is shown in Table 2 and the CO2 emission calculations
are shown in appendix B4.7 on page 172.
4.7.2 Urban placement
An evaluation on implementing wind power in an urban area was completed.
The key points are that large scale wind turbines would be difficult to implement because they
would take up large space over ground and they need none turbulent air to work efficiently.
Large wind turbines need none turbulent wind speeds of approximately 5 to 6 m/s. [24] When
implementing small scale roof based wind turbines on the Lots Road site it would be technical
difficult to connect the large amount of turbines needed to power buildings.
4.7.3 Planning permission
Investigation for wind power to obtain planning permission when being implemented on the
Lots Road site was carried out.
There are many factors to be considered in order to get planning permission for wind power.
Large wind turbines usually need special circumstances to obtain planning permission. [13]
Evaluation of turbine and gearbox noise needs to be assessed and for roof based turbines the
impact of structure borne vibrations needs to be considered. An important factor for noise isto compare the turbine noise to the background noise. If the background noise is high the
impact of turbine noise will be lowered [25]. Other aspects are safety in the event of turbine
failure. This is to make sure the risk of people getting hurt is minimized if for example a
turbine blade loosens.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
To achieve the carbon dioxide reduction target of 50%, hundred and twenty 15 kW wind
turbines are needed and this is considered unrealistic for this thesis. Hundred and twenty windturbines would be very obtrusive for the residents and they would be difficult to place with
fifteen meter long masts and nine meter wide turbine blades. The electricity delivered from
wind power to lower the carbon dioxide reduction with 50% can be used to deliver part of the
sites electrical demand.
From evaluating the carbon dioxide reduction matrix wind power saves a high percentage of
carbon dioxide. The savings are higher then for example biomass and SWH.
In the capital cost matrix wind power is considered expensive compared to for example
biomass and CHP.
From the wind power section it is stated that wind power is used in the UK but planningpermission in urban areas can be difficult. Wind turbines can be noisy, produce flickering and
it takes up space over ground.
Decision:
Wind power will not be selected for the Lots Road site because:
• Reaching the 50 % target while implementing hundred and twenty turbines is
unrealistic.
• Planning permission is difficult to achieve
• Expensive compared to other renewable technologies
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
From evaluating the carbon dioxide reduction matrix CHP do not have a high reduction in
carbon dioxide emissions compared to biomass or any of the renewable energy systems.
The carbon dioxide reduction target of 50% can be achieved with a CHP gas engine sized to2134 kW electricity (2134 kWe). The amount of energy wasted would be large and it is
seemed unreasonable to generate CHP for 50% CO2 Savings.
In the capital cost matrix it is shown that CHP have a low capital cost compared to both SWH
and PV.
From the CHP availability and planning permission sections CHP is currently in use and
planning permission can be obtained when being designed to be unobtrusive for residents.
Decision: CHP will be selected for the Lots Road site because:
• Reaching the 50 % target with CHP is seemed unrealistic but it can be used for CO2 savings
• It is available and planning permission is seemed possible to achieve
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The energy systems are selected from the energy system evaluation.
The selected energies to be implemented at Lots Road are:
• Biomass
• CHP
• SWH
• Photovoltaic
Future option to implement is:
• Biomass CHP
The excluded energies are:
• GSH
• Wind power
5.3.1 Discussion
From the energy system evaluation the energy systems that will be selected for the Lots Road
site are Biomass, CHP or SWH. Biomass and CHP can be used separately or together withother technologies. Solar water heating is only considered with other energy systems to meet
the thermal energy demand. This is because of the limitation of roof space and that SWH do
not have a good winter performance. Photovoltaic is also chosen to be implemented because it
is a suitable renewable energy technology generating electricity and it will be utilized as a
visual sustainable design feature.
The future option is to use Biomass CHP it is an interesting option to use in urban areas. It has
all the advantages of CHP and is a renewable technology. It can not be recommended for this
thesis since there is no biomass CHP working sufficiently in UK urban areas except for test
plants providing heat and power for residents.
More information on energy systems can be seen in appendix A1 on pages 93-150.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The first option (Option A) for an energy strategy for the Lots Road site is:
• Two CHP gas engines to supply the base load. One on each side of the creek connected to all the blocks on respective side. CHP is sized for the base load to not
waste heat.
• Nine biomass (solid fuel) boilers e.g. one in each block. Possible to supply the rest of
the thermal load after the addition of CHP.
• Solar water heating panels are placed on roofs across the site. Roof space evaluation
from the architectural drawings concludes that SWH can supply 20% of the yearly
thermal demand. [5]
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The target is a 50% carbon emission reduction for the Lots Road site and that is
approximately 2000000 kg CO2 / Year
The calculation to obtain the CO2 reduction uses the boiler efficiency data of 78% and theconversion factors from SAP 2005 [27]. The conversion factor for natural gas is 0.194
CO2kg/kWh and for electricity from the grid 0.422 CO2kg/kWh.
Biomass will then save:
(1500000/0.78) x 0.194 = 373076 kgCO2 /Year Equation (7)
CHP will then save:
((7000000/0.78) x 0.194 + (7000000 x 0.777) x 0.422) –
((12439000/0.8) x 0.194) = 1019826 kgCO2 /Year Equation (8)
The target is not achieved and it is necessary with some backup for the biomass boilers in case
of, for example, the fuel delivery is delayed.
To have a biomass boiler in each block that needs maintenance is labour intense and theboilers and fuel storage takes up space in all buildings.
The CHP engine is over sized and ends up wasting electricity or selling electricity back to the
grid. This it is not favourable because the CHP engine is using gas and is emitting carbon
dioxide.
Solar water heating panels can be placed on the roof to supply 20% of the thermal demand.
SWH panels are favourable to implement since they are renewable energy technology but
when using both SWH and CHP it can be difficult to not waste heat. Solar water heating is
most effective during the summer when the heat demand is at its lowest and the CHP engine
is sized to run a minimum 14 hours a day (5000 hours per year). Therefore if SWH and CHP
are utilized together there will have to be large heat storage. No heat waste calculations havebeen carried out when utilizing both CHP and SWH at the Lots Road site because of the time
limit for this thesis.
Photovoltaic panels generating electricity and green roofs can be utilized onsite as sustainable
design features.
Decision: Options A needs to be reviewed
Key points
• The50% CO2 target is not achieved
• CHP is not a renewable energy source
• The heat and power output from the CHP engine do not match the sites energydemand. Electricity needs to be sold back to the grid.
• Biomass needs backup
• Biomass boilers in each block is labour intense
• SWH is not used but can be implemented
• Photovoltaic and green roofs are not utilized.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
In Option A combined heat and power is delivering a major part of the thermal and electrical
demand. CHP is after the review excluded because the carbon dioxide emission savings target
of 50% is not reached. The energy output of CHP is also difficult to match with the Lots Roadsites energy demand and when sized for the base load electricity has to be sold back to the
grid.
Instead of CHP the thermal energy demand is going to be delivered from biomass boilers and
SWH panels. The biomass heat output will increase to 80% of the sites thermal demand with
SWH still sized to deliver 20% of the sites thermal demand.
From Option A there is a biomass boiler in each block it is after the review changed into two
energy centres one on each side of the creek. The two sides are kept independent so if one
energy centre needs maintenance the other one will continue to deliver energy unaffected. No
thorough infrastructure investigation has been carried out because of the time limit for this
thesis.
From Option A biomass is used without any backup but it is considered necessary to have
some sort of backup when delivering biomass fuel to urban areas. This will secure the thermal
energy supply to the residents if for example the fuel deliveries are delayed.
From the case study of the district heating scheme in Barnsley Metropolitan Council the
backup is 50% and delivered from gas boilers [28]. After the evaluation, an energy centre for
this thesis is selected to also have a backup of 50% delivered from gas boilers.
Two biomass boilers and one backup gas boiler will be situated in each energy centre to
provide thermal energy to the site. The backup gas boiler will have the same energy output asthe biomass boilers. If one biomass boiler needs maintenance the gas boiler will then be able
to provide 100% backup.
In Option A there are no photovoltaic panels delivering electricity or any green roof providing
thermal barrier for buildings. For the reviewed Option A there will be implementations of
green roof and photovoltaic panels. The green roof will provide heat gain protection and act
as a sustainable design feature for the residents. The photovoltaic panels will deliver a small
amount of electricity and similar to the green roof act as a sustainable design feature.
Photovoltaic will also be placed around the site to power street lights and signs as part of
sustainable design.
It is seemed favourable to implement a small amount of electricity since CHP has beenexcluded and the most of the electricity have to be bought from the grid.
Buying electricity from the grid is considered as a temporary solution. There is no renewable
energy technology considered suitable to deliver the electrical demand for the Lots Road site
at the moment.
The reviewed option A is called Option B. Option B is considered as the final
recommendation for the Lots Road site.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Backup gas boilers are installed to provide thermal energy if there is any technical problems
with the biomass boilers or if there is unforeseen fuel delivery delays. It is sized to 50% which
is considered reasonable since there are urban sites in the UK utilizing biomass with a 50%
backup. One biomass boiler in each energy centre can be switched off and the energy centreswould still deliver 100% of the thermal energy demand with the help of the gas boilers.
Gas boilers are used as backup on the north side and the peak thermal load is 2240 kW. The
gas engine will provide 50% of the thermal peak load which 1120kW so there will be one
1200kW gas boilers as backup in the north energy centre.
Gas boilers are also used as backup on the south side and the peak thermal load is 1125kW.
The gas engine will provide 50% of the thermal peak load which is 637.5kW so there will be
one 700kW gas boiler as backup in the south energy centre.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The target is a 50% carbon emission reduction for the Lots Road site and that is
approximately 2000000 kg CO2 / Year
The calculation to obtain the CO2 reduction uses the boiler efficiency data of 78% and theconversion factors from SAP 2005 [27]. The conversion factor for natural gas is 0.194
CO2kg/kWh and for electricity from the grid 0.422 CO2kg/kWh.
Biomass will then save:
(6800000/0.78) x 0.194 = 1691282kgCO2 /Year Equation (13)
SWH will then save:
(1700000/0.78) x 0.194 = 422820.5kgCO2 /Year Equation (14)
Photovoltaic will then save:
117200 x 0.422 = 49458.4kgCO2 /Year. Equation (15)
7.3.1 Explanation of electrical energy distribution
The photovoltaic panel is connected to the balance of the system so the electricity generatedfrom the PV panel can be utilized in the building. The BOS contains an invert to change the
DC from the panel to useful AC. It is then connected to the switch board where the PV
electricity helps to meet the peak load from different building services such as pumps and
lifts. The PV electricity is utilized to lower the amount of electricity bought from the grid.
The major part of the electricity delivered to the building is bought from the grid and is
transformed to useful 230 Volts electricity. It is connected to the switch board were it is
distributed to every floors and every flat through an electrical riser, rising from the bottom to
the top of the building. The electricity from the grid also powers the building services with
some help from photovoltaic as mentioned earlier.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Biomass is selected to deliver most of the thermal energy demand and will reduce carbon
dioxide emissions. It is selected on the basis that it does not increase carbon dioxide emissions
into the atmosphere and that the energy system output is not limited to for example fuel
storage space. The evaluation of capital cost shows that the cost to implement biomass is lowcompared to other renewable energy systems. Considering these factors biomass is the
technology to implement on the Lots Road site.
When utilizing biomass boilers it is the biomass fuel source and delivery that is considered
unreliable. The time frame of this thesis has restricted a thorough biomass fuel investigation.
Backup of 50 % delivered from gas boilers are used and is considered necessary since
biomass fuel delivery can be from remote locations. This report as mentioned earlier has not
investigated carbon dioxide emissions that will be emitted during fuel delivery.
The capital cost is not a high priority for the report but is showing how much it would cost to
implement a system. This favours biomass, CHP and biomass CHP since the fuel cost for
these energy systems are not incorporated in the capital cost or in the evaluation when
selecting suitable energy systems.
Solar water heating panels are implemented to deliver 20% of the yearly thermal demand.
When utilizing several energy sources it reduces the risk and the need of a 100% backup for
the biomass boilers. A solar water heating advantage compared to biomass is that the fuel
does not need to be bought.
Unfortunately SWH can not deliver 100% of the energy demand since it is relying on
absorbing the energy from the sun. The solar water heating energy output peaks during the
summer and is low during the winter. Biomass is therefore sized to meet the peak load since it
occurs during the winter months.
The limitation in time has meant that no annual energy output study for SWH have been
carried out. Unfortunately information found for SWH winter performance was very limited.
What can be said is that SWH is currently working in the UK and is known to have good
summer performance. It can in some occasions provide the entire base load during the
summer.
Photovoltaic is implemented to generate electricity to the site so not all electricity has to be
bought from the grid. Photovoltaic will also act as a sustainable design feature. These are the
reasons fore implementing PV even though it has low energy efficiency and a high capital
cost.
It is placed on block GG because of the south facing angled roof. The roof is elevated and this
decreases the risk of the panels getting shaded. The answer to why PV panels are placed on
block GG is that the angled roof enables the PV panels to work with as high efficiency as
possible.
Green roof is placed on block HH because it will prevent heat gain and will be a visual
attractive design feature on the Lots Road site. These are the reasons why green roof are
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The thesis shows that carbon dioxide reduction can be achieved from several energy systems.
The energy strategy recommended reaches the 50% CO2 reduction target by utilizing a
combination of renewable energy systems.
The final recommendation will implement biomass boilers and solar water heating panels to
generate 100 % of the thermal energy demand for the Lots Road site.
The conclusion is that biomass boilers will be utilised at the Lots Road site. They are a
favourable option to use in urban areas in the UK when considering carbon dioxide savings,
energy output and the low capital cost of implementing biomass. The final recommendation is
not considering biomass fuel delivery which should preferably be from a biomass fuel source
close to the site or the cost of biomass fuel.
Solar water heating panels are considered as a good alternative when implementing renewable
energies in an urban area in the UK. It delivers thermal energy and can be used as in the final
recommendation for preheating. The limitation for solar water heating is that it must be
combined with other technologies to deliver the total thermal demand.
Photovoltaic panels are implemented in the final recommendation to lower the amount of
electricity being bought from the grid and to be a visual sustainable design feature. The
energy efficiency for photovoltaic are low and it can therefore only deliver a small amount of
electricity to the site.
To buy electricity from the grid is still the favourable option for buildings in urban areas this
is because it is available and reliable. It will continue to be the favourable option until PV
becomes more efficient or until wind turbines can be implemented unobtrusively in urban
areas. Another option is biomass CHP it will generate both heat and power. Biomass CHP isused in other parts of Europe and will probably be more available in the UK in the future.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Figure 1 Methodology flow diagram ...................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 Over view of the site ................................................................................................................................. 6 Figure 3 The Lots Road south side.......................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4 The Lots Road north side ........... .............. ............. ............. ............. .............. ............. ............ .............. ..... 7 Figure 5 Overview and direction of Block JJ .......... .............. ............. .............. ............ ............. .............. ............. . 39 Figure 6 Block JJ - Front view ............ ............ .............. .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ....... 40 Figure 7 The Top view of block JJ ........... .............. ............. ............. ............. .............. ............. ............ .............. ... 40 Figure 8 The Left side view of block JJ ................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 9 Overview and front view direction of Block HH ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ............ ...... 42 Figure 10 Block HH Front view ........... .............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ....... 42 Figure 11 The Top view of block HH ................................................................................................................... 43 Figure 12 The Left side view of block HH ........................................................................................................... 43 Figure 13 Overview of block GG and front view direction .................................................................................. 44 Figure 14 Block GG Front view ........... .............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ....... 45 Figure 15 The Top view of Block GG .................................................................................................................. 45 Figure 16 The Right side view of Block GG .............. ............. .............. ............ .............. ............. ............ ............. 46 Figure 17 Overview and front view direction of block FF ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ............ ...... 47 Figure 18 Block FF front view .............................................................................................................................. 47 Figure 19 The Top view of block FF .................................................................................................................... 48 Figure 20 The Left side view of block FF .............. ............. ............. ............. .............. ............. ............ .............. ... 48 Figure 21 Overview and the front view direction of block EE ............................................................................. 49 Figure 22 Block EE Front view............... .............. ............. ............. ............. .............. ............. ............ .............. ... 50 Figure 23 The Top view for block EE ............. .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. .......... 50 Figure 24 The Back view of block EE .................................................................................................................. 51 Figure 25 Overview and direction of front view for block DD ............................................................................. 52 Figure 26 Block DD Front view ........... .............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ....... 52 Figure 27 The Top view of block DD ................................................................................................................... 53 Figure 28 The back view f block DD .................................................................................................................... 53 Figure 29 Overview and direction of front view for block CC ............................................................................. 54 Figure 30 Block CC Front view ............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ............ ...... 54 Figure 31 The Top view of block CC ................................................................................................................... 55 Figure 32 The Back view of block CC ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. .......... 55 Figure 33 Overview and direction of the front view for block BB ....................................................................... 56 Figure 34 Block BB Front view ............................................................................................................................ 56 Figure 35 The Top view of block BB ................................................................................................................... 57 Figure 36 The Back view of block BB ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. .......... 57 Figure 37 Overview and direction of front view for block AA ............................................................................. 58 Figure 38 Block AA Front view ........... .............. ............ .............. ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ....... 58 Figure 39 The Top view of block AA ................................................................................................................... 59 Figure 40 The Back view of block AA ................................................................................................................. 59 Figure 41 Energy distribution for Option A .......................................................................................................... 65 Figure 42 North and south side output loads from biomass boilers ............. .............. ............. ............ .............. ... 69 Figure 43 SWH output from the Lots Road site ............ ............. ............ .............. ............. .............. ............ .......... 70 Figure 44 PV output from the Lots Road site ....................................................................................................... 71 Figure45 North side energy centre and buildings ................................................................................................. 75 Figure 46 South side energy centre and buildings ................................................................................................ 76 Figure 47 Schematics over the south energy centre. ............................................................................................. 78 Figure 48 Schematics over the north energy centre .............................................................................................. 79 Figure 49 Block GG electrical connection ............................................................................................................ 83 Figure 50 Thermal connection to block JJ ............................................................................................................ 84 Figure 51 A residential unit heat and power connection ....................................................................................... 85
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Appendix A Energy Systems & Sustainable Design Systems
A1 Energy systems
This section reviews in greater detail varying energy systems. It includes Biomass,
CHP, Biomass CHP, GSH, PV, SWH and Wind power.
In this section there is also an evaluation to find the most suitable CHP method for
urban areas, together with a description and evaluation of energy for waste
possibilities.
A1.1 Biomass
Biomass is burned as fuel to generate energy there are different types such as wood
chips and willow. Biomass is derived from bio organic material and is a carbonneutral energy source this means that the net emission is zero. Biomass absorbs
carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and that is then the only carbon dioxide
emissions released back into to the atmosphere when it is used as fuel.
The biomass fuel is divided into dry and wet fuel types. Dry fuel is solid fuel from for
example forestry, woodchip or energy grass. Wet fuel is gas or liquids. Wet fuel is for
example methane extracted from anaerobic digestion.
Figure 1 Carbon dioxide cycle
Photosynthesis is the process plants and trees use to transform photon energy to
chemical energy. [1]
Energy plant
Biomass
Carbon
Dioxide
Carbon dioxide is being absorbed
through Photosynthesis
Biomass is being harvested and
transported to the energy plant
Carbon dioxide is being
released back into the
atmosphere from combustion.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Dry fuel is solid biomass fuel and can be grown for fuel generation or gathered
forestry residue. Here is a brief explanation of some dry biomass fuel types.
After the dry fuel section is a brief explanation of the three methods to generateenergy. They are conventional combustion, gasification and pyrolysis.
Dry Fuel types
Using biomass fuel for domestic and commercial use is widely known in countries
like Sweden, Denmark or North America. Biomass is also utilized for heating homes
in developing countries where burning wood in a fireplace is sometimes the only
available option. In the UK biomass is not a common option to heat and power
homes. UK has one straw fired power plant to generate electricity [2].
Material from forestry or timber residues such as sawdust and wood shavings is used
for biomass fuel. Forestry production in Europe is mainly for timber and pulp. This
leaves surplus material that can be utilized for energy generation. This is favourable
because the material utilized as fuel would otherwise go to waste.
Biomass is also grown with the intention to be utilized as fuel. One method is to use
small tree harvesting. Small trees are then grown and after harvesting the trees are
chopped up into, wood chips, biomass fuel. The advantage is that after harvesting re-
plantation can be done immediately.
The purpose of growing biomass fuel is to achieve a more reliable and available fuelsource than just forestry residue. Problems with residue material are its unreliable
density and calorific value (energy per kilo). This should be high to get a high energy
output. Another factor is the moister content in biomass if it is to high combustion is
hard to achieve.
Energy Crops are mainly willow and it is grown as biomass fuel as mentioned. The
willow is grown as Short Rotation Coppice (SRC). SRC is a known biomass source in
the UK and is well proven in Scandinavia. It has a growing cycle between 2-4 years
before harvesting and is relatively inexpensive to plant. Another advantage is that
after using the land for SRC it has a short recovery period before it can be reused.
An unproven energy crop in the UK with promising prospects is Miscanths.Miscanths is also known as elephant grass. The grass can be grown specifically for
biomass fuel and has a growing cycle of one year before harvesting. Disadvantage of
Miscanthus is that it is difficult to reuse the land for another purpose. [3] [4]
Wood pellets are a form of biomass fuel that can be formed from forestry residue.
Pellets are dryer and have a higher calorific value than wood chips, however they are
more expensive due to the more intensive manufacturing process.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
through the boiler to absorb heat and then to a heat exchanger where it releases the
thermal energy to provide space heating and hot water.
Gasification and Pyrolysis
The other two methods to generate thermal energy for dry biomass fuel are throughgasification and pyrolysis.
The gasification process generally takes place in a temperature range between 800 to
1200 °C. Biomass fuel is heated up under a low oxygen condition to reach
gasification, a state of incomplete combustion. A gas called Syngas is created in a
thermal process with oxygen. The product from the gasification process will be a
mixture of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and waste products such as tar and ash
depending on process. The gas can be used in gas engines and turbines. To ensure
efficient use gas cleaning is essential.
The pyrolysis process generally takes place in a temperature range between 400 to
700 °C. The process is very similar to gasification but uses zero oxygen. The product
fuels from the pyrolysis are gas (also Syngas) or liquid fuel depending on the
manufacturing process. The gas can be used as fuel in gas engines or turbines and the
liquid can be used as liquid biofuel. Liquid fuel is more controllable and easier to
handle so Pyrolysis has a promising future for transportation and storage. To ensure
efficient use cleaning of the fuel is essential. [6] [7]
Infrastructure
Biomass fuel has to be bought it is not like the renewable energies of photovoltaic or
wind power. Harvesting photon energy from the sun and kinetic energy in the wind,for PV and wind power, are available and can be harvested cost free on site. This
means biomass will have a longer payback time and it is shown in the payback
calculation section in appendix.
The price for biomass fuel is usually referred to as the same as fossil fuel. The
important factor is to look at the calorific value. It is the value that determines how
much energy can be extracted from the fuel. For biomass dry raw bio fuel it is
approximately 20 MJ/kg (LHV) this is comparable to mid quality coal. The calorific
quality differs if it is dried or freshly harvested. Freshly harvested wood biomass has
usually a moister content of 50% and this lowers the caloric value to 8 MJ/kg (LHV)
[8]. As mentioned the calorific value is related to moisture content. The calorific
value also varies with the kind of biomass material that is being utilized.
Pellets have a higher calorific value then other biomass fuels and this is one of the
reasons to why pellets are more expensive. From a background document for pellets
the calorific value is estimated to 4.7 kWh/kg which is 16.9 MJ/kg. (LHV) [9].
There are two measures of calorific value. Lower heating value (LHV) and Higher
heating value (HHV). LHV is the Net calorific value. It measures the heat released on
the basis that the water remains in the vapour phase.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
HHV is the Gross calorific value. It measures the heat released when the fuel is burnt
and the water has condensed out of the combustion gases as a liquid.
Here is a comparison of the calorific HHV for different fuels [10].
Calorific value table
Fuel HHV MJ/kgEthanol 30
methanol 23
General purpose coal 32-42
Diesel fuel 46
Gas oil 46
Wood 15% water(Biomass) 16
North Sea Natural Gas 39Table 1 Showing calorific value of different fuels
In the table above biomass, with 15% water content, has a higher heating value of
16MJ/kg and natural gas has a value of 39MJ/kg. A larger amount of fuel is therefore
needed for biomass then natural gas to achieve the same energy output.
Fuel storage for biomass has the advantage from other renewable energies that it can
easily be stored in a storage room or a basement for later use. This is also a
disadvantage since it needs storage space and is not harvested and directly converted
to useful energy. For photovoltaic the photon energy is converted to energy directly
through the semiconductor. Another disadvantage is that since the calorific value isrelatively low for biomass. Biomass storage requires a larger space then for example
diesel fuel.
In the London toolkit there is a case study of King’s Mead Primary School, it has a
10m3
storage bunker. Providing fuel to a 50 kW biomass boiler, for this relatively
small project, fuel only needs to be delivered 3 to 4 times a year [11].
Biomass is a renewable energy source and, when transport emissions are not
considered, is not adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. It is important to consider
travelling emission because biomass fuel sometimes has to travel large distances
between harvesting and end user. From for example the forest to an energy centre
located in an urban area, this should be taken into consideration when choosing
biomass for energy generation. The carbon emission emitted to the atmosphere is
therefore not only the carbon emission emitted by the bio mass fuel when utilized and
subtracting the absorbed emissions through photosynthesis. It is also the emissions
from travelling to the end destination. The most environmentally friendly transport
alternative for biomass is considered to be by ship or boat [12].
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Wet bio fuel can be created through a digestion process from bio degradable waste
such as garden residue, certain wood waste and agriculture residue.
Anaerobic Digestion and Landfill
Anaerobic digestion (AD) converts bio waste that otherwise would be difficult to
utilize such as agriculture waste and organic waste.
The AD method digests bio waste to produce biogas (mostly methane) in the absence
of oxygen.
Biogas from anaerobic digestion can be used in a steam turbine because of the
separation from the heat source and turbine. Bio gas is burnt in the boiler and water
(steam) is used as the medium that absorbs the thermal energy and drives the turbine.The biogas can also be cleaned and used in gas engines or gas turbines.
The landfill method extracts gas created from digestion, similar to AD, of bio waste.
The gas (mostly Methane) can then be burnt for energy generation
Land fill gas can effectively be used in a steam turbine. Land fill gas (LFG) when
cleaned can also be used in gas engines and multi fuel engines. Multi fuel engines are
engines utilizing different fuels for example landfill gas mixed with diesel. [13] [14]
How to deliver biomass fuel to the Lots Road site and fuel types such as bio diesel or
rapeseed oil have because of limitation in time not been investigated in this report.
Advantages
• Renewable technology
• Considered carbon neutral
• Well known technology
Disadvantage
• Fuel transport
• Fuel storage
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Gas turbines have god reliability and high output ranges from 500kW to 250MW. Gasturbines expels a quality exhaust gas which means the gas has a high thermal energy
content that can favourably be utilized in CHP applications. Gas turbine CHP has low
maintenance and a long time between overhaul. Gas turbines can work on natural gas
but also biogas from gasification. They have high efficiency when working on full
load but the efficiency decreases when the load decreases [3]. Therefore if selecting
gas turbine CHP it is important that the turbine will work in optimal, full load,
conditions.
Gas turbine uses the Brayton Cycle. The Brayton cycle simplified is that air is
compressed heated and expanded.
In the gas turbine the air is lead through the inlet where it is compressed and mixed
with fuel then combusted which drives a turbine that is connected to a generator to
produce electricity. The exhaust heat is utilized by passing it trough a heat exchanger.
The thermal energy can then be used for space heating and hot water [4].
Figure 4 Simplified explanation of gas turbine CHP
The figure above shows a simplified, gas turbine, onsite CHP system providing
domestic hot water (DHW), space heating (SH) and electricity for the residents.
AIR
Compression
Combustion
Fuel
Turbine
Exhaust
DHW and SH
Cold Water
DHW and SH
Warm Water
GeneratorElectricity fordomestic use
Heatexchanger
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The steam turbine uses the Rankine cycle. The Rankine cycle is a thermo dynamic
cycle where a heat source transfers water into high pressure steam.
A boiler generates thermal energy that pressurised water absorbs to create highpressurized super-heated steam. The thermal energy in the steam then drives the
turbine to generate electricity via a generator. The thermal energy left in the steam is
then utilized for thermal applications.
Figure 5 Simplified explanation of steam turbine CHP
The figure above is showing a steam turbine CHP scheme where the boiler generates
hot steam that drives a turbine to generated electricity from the generator. The thermal
energy content left in the steam is then utilized for heating of DHW and SH. This is
by dissipating heat through a heat exchanger. The return heat from the heat exchanger
is then cooled through a condenser and the water is circulated back to repeat the
process [5].
In steam turbines as mentioned fuel is burnt to heat water to create steam. CHP steam
turbines have an advantage since the energy is transferred by hot steam from the
boiler to the turbine and is not directly connected with the turbine. The advantage is
that various types of fuels can be utilized in the boiler. It can for example work onbiogas from landfill.
Steam turbines sizes are available for ranges from 100 kW to 250 MW and are
expected to have a long life time if maintained correctly. Disadvantages for steam
turbines are that they have a long start up time compared to other CHP technologies.
Together with a low power to heat ratio compared to other CHP technologies [6].
It is therefore important when selecting steam turbine CHP that the heat demand is
high compared to the electrical demand.
Fuel
DHW and SH
Cold
DHW and SH
Warm
Heatexchanger
Boiler
Turbine
GeneratorElectricity for
Domestic usage
Condenser
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Here is a brief overview of Biomass CHP it is still considered as a new technology
even though it is utilized in countries across Europe.
In the UK biomass is not broadly utilized for domestic heating schemes together withthat CHP have not been well known in the UK for more than the last five to ten years.
A brief investigation were carried out for biomass CHP and from the investigation no
on site biomass CHP plant, delivering heat and power in urban area to residents, were
found. Biomass CHP was utilized as a test plant in Bedzed and there are a few small
scale biomass CHP plants working in the UK for example ECOS millennium centre in
Northern Ireland [12]. From this brief investigation biomass CHP were considered
unavailable early in the project. The best example found on residential onsite biomass
CHP is the Titanic mill in Huddersfield [13] it is being converted into flats and will in
later stages implement a small scale biomass CHP delivering heat and power to
residents.
As mentioned previously in this section steam turbines and gas turbines can be used
with fuel from gasification and pyrolysis. It could also use gas from landfill or
anaerobic digestion. Gasification and pyrolysis is still a new technology to use for
biomass CHP in the UK. Gasification is more widely used for waste processing there
is for example a small scale municipal waste plant in Bristol.
When using solid biomass fuel for CHP, gasification and pyrolysis are favourable
methods compared to conventional combustion. Solid biomass fuels are burnt in a
boiler for steam turbine CHP. Gasification and pyrolysis transform the biomass to
biogas and can therefore be used in a gas turbine or gas engine CHP [10].
Gas turbines or gas engines have a higher power to heat ratio compared to steam
turbines and can therefore generate more electricity.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The gas is then compressed by an electric driven compressor. This increase the
pressure and temperature of the gas i.e. the electric compressor lifts the temperature to
the wanted output temperature. The gas is then delivered to the condenser where it
dissipates its thermal energy to warm the building.
In the condenser when dissipating its thermal energy the gas condense to a liquidstate. The liquid is then expanded through an expansion valve this lowers its
temperature and pressure. After returning to a low temperature and pressure fluid the
heat pump, refrigeration, cycle can be repeated. [1]
There are two different types of ground source systems it is either a direct or indirect
system. It is called an indirect system because the heat is transferred to the evaporator
via a heat exchanger. In an direct system the ground source pipes are used as the
evaporator [2].
Ground Source heating closed loops
Pipes are buried under ground in a horizontal or vertical position. A fluid in the pipes
is circulated to extract heat from the ground. After extracting heat from the ground the
fluid is lead to the heat pump where it releases its thermal energy. There are open and
closed systems in the closed system the fluid is pumped back through the pipes to
repeat the process while it is dumped in the open system.
Figure 8 Vertical closed system
HP
Building
Ground
CooledWater
WarmedWater
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The spiral coil also know as a slinky coil is laid out in a trench with the benefit that it
needs less surface area then for horizontal piping .
The trench length for a heating system is approximately only 30% compared tohorizontal pipes. Even though the trench is shorter the coil length needs to be longer
then to achieve the same thermal output [7].
Figure 11 Spiral coil design
Spiral Coil
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Energy piles work as a closed heat pump system. The Energy pile is placed in the
foundation of the building where it provides heating or cooling to the building. The
Piles uses the grounds natural thermal conductivity to extract or dissipate thermal
energy. Piles are usually embedded in concrete which acts as good energy transfermedium. A fluid is used to absorb or release heat in the tubing of the piles. The fluid
is pumped around the system and releases its thermal energy to the heat pump. The
typical configuration for energy piles is to use a reversible heat pump. A reversible
heat pump is used for heating in the winter and cooling in the summer [8].
There are several different types of configurations were the energy system is
connected to the foundation. Below are energy piles and energy slabs.
An energy pile configuration were the tubing is attached on the inside of a steel cage
is shown below.
Figure 12 Energy pile configuration [9]
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
It works with the same principle as an open loop borehole system but uses a different
water source. Here an open source such as a river is used for heating or cooling by
extracting warm or cold water from a deep point in the river. It is then pumped
through a heat exchanger where it dissipates its thermal energy and is then discharged
back to the source. The returning water is discharged close to the surface of the river.
Figure 15 Surface water cooling system
Other open loop systems are for example a ground air system. Then air is heated bydrawing air through an underground matrix to absorb thermal energy from the ground
below the building. It is then passed through a heat pump realising its thermal energy.
Disadvantages for an open loops system is that it requires regular maintenance to
make sure filters do not collect to much debris and that pumps are more open to
erosion then in a closed system. [10]
River
Cold
Filter
Heat
Pump
Warm
Warm
Cold
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The figure below shows how the coefficient of performance for a heat pump changes
depending on condensation (output) temperature. This is for the heat pump when the
source temperature is kept at zero degrees. The curves in the figure are measured heat
pump efficiency curves except for the top theoretical curve. [15]
Figure 16 CoP changing with the condensation temperature. [15]
In order to achieve a high CoP for the heat pump it is important to have a small gap
between the condensation (output) and evaporation (source) temperature. This means
that for heating the ground source should be as warm as possible while thedistribution temperature to the building should be as low as possible. This is to
minimise the electrical input for heating.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
General configuration of an ETC is a transparent outer tube with an inner black
painted metal absorption tube. Between the two tubes the air has been extracted tocreate a vacuum this is to stop convection of heat to the outer shell after the
absorption tube has absorbed energy. [3]
Figure 18 Cross section tube Figure 19 ETC
ETC configuration: [3][4]
1 outer glass shell
2 inner glass shell
3 Vacuum
4 absorption layer
5 copper sheet
6 inlet fluid
7 outlet fluid
8 inlet from manifold
9 outlet from manifold
10 manifold
3
42
1
5
67
1
28
9
10
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Figure 20 Showing a combi boiler [112(8)]. Note: SH stands for Space Heating.
Cold water enters in through the tank and is heated from the SWH system via a coil
heat exchanger. The coil heat exchanger is generally placed at the bottom of the tank
and acts as a pre heater to the boiler system. The boiler brings the water to a sufficient
temperature, over 60 °C for DHW, because of the risk of legionella.
The advantage with SWH system is that during the summer month the SWH system
can deliver most of the hot water demand to the building. The boilers can then acts as
backup [7].
Solar water heating can be used for space heating (SH) but is mostly used for
domestic hot water (DHW). In a combi-boiler as shown in figure 4 there is dualstorage space so the whole tank can be used for storage of thermal energy from the
solar water heating system if the boiler is switched off.
The fluid in the systems is circulated by an electrical pump, which can be powered by
photovoltaic, or by natural convection (no pump) to get a renewable energy system
[7].
DHW
SH
CombiBoiler
Boiler
S u n l i g h t
Inlet
Outlet
Heat
Exchangers
S W H P a n e l
Cold Water
Warm Water
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The name photovoltaic can be translated to light electricity. The photovoltaic (PV)
panel do as the name implies convert solar energy to electricity. There are over
thousand PV systems delivering electricity in the UK [1].
Technical description
Sunlight hits a photovoltaic panel that consist of semiconductor cells. Semiconductors
produce direct current (DC) in a process of absorbing photons. Photons carry energy
particles from the sun.
The release of energy when photons are absorbed excites electrons. An excited
electron can reach a free state. This means it is free to travel and this creates
electricity. The photons that hits the PV module has different amount of stored energy
and wave lengths. This is important since the photons being absorbed by the
semiconductor depends on the band gap.
The band gap of the semi conductor is the difference of energy (measured in electron
voltage eV) required for an electron to travel from the bound state to a free state.
Semiconductors with high band gap only absorb photons with high energy content
and photons with lower energy content will be ignored. When a low band gap is used
it absorbs more energy but this result in a weaker electromagnetic field compared to a
high band gap semiconductor.
The electromagnetic field is a force that is measured in voltage (V). The
electromagnetic field makes the free electrons travel from the negative to the positive
charged side of the PV panel. It is important to optimize the band gap (Strength in theelectromagnetic field to band gap) to achieve an energy efficient semiconductor. For a
single cell material an efficient band gap is approximately 1.4 eV (electron Volt). [2]
Materials
The performance for different semiconductor materials are depending on there
absorption coefficient and the band gap. The absorption coefficient is a coefficient for
how long the photon has to travels before being absorbed in the semiconductor.
The most common materials used for semiconductors in PV are Silicon as crystalline,
amorphous or multi-crystalline material.
Poly-crystalline materials and single crystalline materials are produced as thin film to
be used as semiconductors in PV panels. Different types of poly-crystalline materials
are silicon, copper indium diselenide (CIS) or cadmium telluride.
The single crystalline materials are for example materials such as gallium arsenide.
These materials provide high efficiency solar cells. [3]
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
PV cells are generally built of different layers which are shown in the figure below.
Figure 21 PV panel configuration
PV layers [8]
1 Cover Glass
2 Transparent adhesive
3 antireflective coating
4 Front contact
5 Negative semi conductor
6 Positive semi conductor
7 Back contact
8 Substrate
Figure 77 illustrates a semiconductor with a positive and negative layer. The positive
and negative layer is achieved by doping the semiconductor to ensure instability. The
negative layers are over charged with electrons which mean it has electrons that don’thave a space to fill and the positive layers lacks electrons and therefore have available
spaces.
How the semiconductor works is that electrons cross over from the negative to the
positive side and fill an empty space. This then forms a barrier (an electromagnetic
field) between the layers. Then an alternative route between the positive and negative
side is introduced so the electrons can travel and be utilized for electricity. [9]
12 3
4
56
7
8
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Photovoltaic works all over the UK and the panels can be integrated to the roof design
to look like regular roof tiles. It can also be used to cover the façade of a building.
Estimated energy produced is around 750 KWh/year for 1 kilowatt peak (kWp) of
panel. Kilowatt peak is the peak amount of energy, in full sunlight, produced from the
panel. 750 kWh per year is approximately 45 to 50% of the electricity demand for a 2
bedroom flat of 4 people according to the London Toolkit. Typically peak energy
from photovoltaic (8-12 % Poly-crystalline Silicon) is 100 Watt per m2
of panel. For a
domestic house the usual panel size is between 9 to 18 m2
to get an output of 1 to 2
kWp. [16]
A series of cells are connected to meet the energy load. To get the most efficient useof PV different factors have to be considered for example house orientation, roof
elevation and the inclination of the roof. A key point to get efficient use of PV is to
ensure that the PV panel is not shadowed at any point during the day. Shadowing
usually occurs from trees or closely located buildings. Shadowing prevents direct
radiation on the PV panel and therefore lowers the efficiency. [19]
Table 21 is showing percentage of annual irradiation absorbed ((kWh/m2)/yr)
regarding tilt (from horizontal to vertical) and orientation.
TILT H to V Orientation % of radiation absorbed
30 degrees South East 95%
30 degrees South West 95%
10 to 55 degrees South Approx 100%
90 degrees V Less then 80%
0 H 90 %Table 7 Data of radiation for London [18]
Irradiation over London is approximately 1059 kWh/m2 /year (2.9 (kWh/m
2)/day),
estimated value from DTI [17].
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The wind has been used as a force for many hundred years. The wind flow rate has a
velocity and when it hits an item it exerts a force. The quantity of this force has to do
with the density of the medium (wind) and the velocity at impact. The other force is
the aerodynamic force and this has to do with equilibrium. If the velocity is decreasedthe pressure will increase to keep equilibrium. This theory is shown below in
Bernoulli’s equation. [1]
P + (1/2 ρV2) = Constant Equation (73)
p= pressure, V=velocity, ρ=density.
When wind turbine blades rotate the kinetic energy in the wind is transferred into
mechanical energy. The mechanical energy can then be used to generate electricity
from a generator.
Aerodynamics
A wind power station uses the same technology as an aircraft to generate lift. The
blades are shaped as an aerofoil to generate lift that exceeds the gravity of the aerofoil
so it moves upwards. On an aircraft wing there are four aerodynamic forces Lift,
Gravity, Thrust and Drag.
An aerofoil is usually rated on a lift to drag ratio. Lift and Drag are design parameters
and gravity is constant at (9.81 m/s2). Drag is depending on the shape of the aerofoil
and has to do with the air flow over the aerofoil exerting a certain friction between the
air and aerofoil surface. This creates turbulence and slows the air down.
The reason for all wings and blades looking very similar is that the design lets the air
to speed up (bulge design) over the wing and is constant (flat design) under the wing.
This creates suction on top of the wing (low pressure) and pressure under the aerofoil
(higher pressure), to get equilibrium. This generates lift which makes the aerofoil
move upwards. [2]
Figure 24 showing an aerofoil.
Gravity
Lift
Drag
Thrust
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Figure 26 showing simplified drawings over the Nacelle
The electricity from the generator is sent to a transformer. It transforms the electricityup to between 10000-30000 Volts. This is because there are few losses in sending a
high voltage alternating current (AC) through the grid. The voltage is then
transformed down before being utilized in buildings. The voltage in most European
households is 230 volts and the AC at 50 Hz. [7]
4
15
12
11
7
10
6
8
5
Nacelle
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
energy per year. It takes into consideration the probability of wind speeds occurring
and the power (kinetic energy) that a specific wind speed carries (The Weibull
distribution function is shown on page 145).
Small turbines usually have rotor diameter of 2 to 9 meter and can favourably be used
in remote location where there is no national grid connection. When located without
grid connection batteries can be used to store electricity [13]. Large turbines can beused for energy generation to communities or as supplier from wind farms (several
wind turbines together in an energy centre) to the national grid.
In urban areas such as London it is difficult to use large scale wind turbines. Small
scale turbines can be used on buildings. Special design small scale turbines can
manage to work efficiently on lower wind speed and in turbulent air around 3.5 m/s.
Normal turbines have to be located away from the building to get undisturbed air and
usually requires wind speeds of 5 to 6m/s. [14] [17]
When planning to place a wind turbine in an urban area the visual impact needs to be
considered. Wind turbines will always stick out and can not be hidden in a basement
or underground as other renewable energies.
An aspect that also needs to be considered is the noise. Wind turbines without
gearbox is considered quieter then “gearbox” turbines. The noise level at the base of a
“none gearbox turbine” has been measured to 60 dB [15].Recommended maximum
level of noise, in a living room, from CIBSE is 30 dB [16].
Other planning issues are placing wind turbines on listed buildings or in conservation
areas. Local authorities also need to be notified to approve the system installation if
the wind turbine is installed to the national grid.
Vertical Axis Wind Turbines (VAWT) is not discussed here they have been
considered but they are not seemed feasible because they have a lower efficiency then
HAWT
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
waste is being combusted/incinerated. The ash from the waste is removed to landfill.
[5]
The fluidised bed incineration plant is a technology that removes metal and heavy
particles before combustion. The fluidised bed is usually a hot sand bed being
fluidised by an air stream. The air stream is directed vertically to the bed. The
fluidised bed moves the waste into the furnace and is incinerated. [6]
Oscillating kiln incineration plants have the waste loaded onto a hopper which
regularly feeds waste to the kiln. Waste is delivered into the kiln and mixed with air to
get combusted. [7]
Other EFW methods
Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) with an anaerobic digestion to generate fuel
is one waste handling solution. MBT is a waste management process of several steps.
Sorting of waste is necessary to separate the biological waste. The biological waste is
then sent to Anaerobic Digestion (AD) which produces methane. It can then be used
as fuel for example in gas engines. The waste left is then re-sorted for metals and the
fraction of metals found is sent for recycling. This only leaves the RDF waste which
can be burnt in a small incineration plant on site. RDF is refused derived fuel. It is
waste such as paper, plastic, textiles and is considered to have a good combustion
quality [8].
Pyrolysis and Gasification processing can be used for handling waste. If the facility
were placed on site the waste would be heated under low oxygen (gasification) or no
oxygen (pyrolysis) presence. This creates a fuel that can be used in for example gas
turbine CHP plants. Cleaning of the gas is important before using it as fuel for energy
generation [9].
Energy From Waste Design
For MBT with AD processing involves pre sorting to separate the recycled objects.
The rest is then divided to AD and RDF. From AD the end products is mainly
methane which can be used for fuel. From the waste going into the MBT 20% is still
sent to landfill.
The energy output from the MBT plant with AD of 100000 tonne waste per year is
1.5MWel. This is created from the anaerobic digestion. The optimum size for an MBT
plant is 100000 tonne per year with the physical size approximated to 8 hectare to beeconomical viable. The technology is relatively unproven in the UK there is only one
full scale plant in Leicester city council.
For gasification and pyrolysis pre treatment and sorting of waste can be necessary.
The only proven plant in the UK is of clinical waste. Cleaning of the emission gases is
important. First it is held at 1250 °C for 2 second to destroy organic pollutants. The
gas then pass through a sodium bicarbonate filter to remove acidic residue. Before
being realised through a stack it passes a catalyser to remove nitrogen oxides.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Gasification and pyrolysis is a clean process and is within the waste incineration
directive (WID) limit. It leaves between 10 to 15% bottom ash for non hazardous
landfill and approximately 5% fly ash. The fly ash is sent to a hazardous landfill.
The energy output from 30000 tonne wastes per year is 1.4MWel. The optimum size
for a plant is approximately less then 2 hectares for a 30000 tonne plant to beeconomical viable. The technology is a relatively unproven technology there is one
working gasification waste plant in the UK and it is dealing with hospital waste.
There is also one test plant for gasification municipal waste in Bristol.
Incineration by oscillating kiln, the waste can go untreated into the furnace. It reaches
temperatures of 1100 °C. Emissions for oscillating kilns are minimised by burning the
waste at a high temperature with the gas being cooled rapidly. Together with that the
emitted gas is filtered and chemical treated to remove particles and acidic residue. The
bottom ash created is 20 % of the waste input and is sent to a non hazardous landfill.
The fly ash created is 5 % of the waste input and it is sent to a hazardous landfill. This
means 25 % of the waste input to the oscillating kiln is sent to landfill. A 60000
tonnes plant per year would generate around 3MWel with a physical size of 1 hectare.Oscillating kiln incineration is a well proven technology in the UK [10].
Dioxins
Dioxins are persistent organic pollutants (POP). They are know to cause cancer in
humans and are carcinogenic. Dioxin levels in humans are mainly from the food
chain. They can also be absorbed from breathing from for example waste incineration
facilities emitting dioxins into the atmosphere.
To keep the dioxin levels low for waste incineration plants the temperatures whendioxins are created are avoided. Dioxins are formed when waste is being combusted
in temperature ranges of 250 to 400 °C. Dioxins are also formed in the cooling flues
in temperatures of 200 to 350 °C. It is created from unburnt carbon and metal
chlorides in the temperature ranges mentioned. Modern waste incineration plants are
within the WID limits allowed for dioxin.
According to a study (1996) on residents living near an incinerator plant in an urban
area in Italy it was found that there was a 6.7 fold increase in deaths from lung cancer
[11].
Advantages
• EFW can be used instead of landfill
Disadvantages
• EFW is not a renewable energy technology
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The evaluation is assessed from the energy from waste section. There are three
different types of waste plants evaluated.
• MBT (Mechanical Biological treatment) with AD (Anaerobic digestion)
• Gasification and Pyrolysis
• Incineration (Oscillating kiln)
Evaluation of an MBT facility with an AD plant.
MBT with AD
Advantages
100000 tonne waste / year would generate1.5 MW energy
Well know technology in Europe
DisadvantagesLarge footprint 8 hectare when dealing with
100000 tonne waste/yr
The waste needs to be sorted
Emits carbon dioxideTable 12 shows key points for MBT with AD
The MBT waste needs space for sorting before processing and space is also needed
for the AD. The large space needed makes it a difficult process to have onsite in an
urban area. Together with that AD is odorous and the digestion process contains
bacteria’s which can be harmful for people. If the AD process is located away fromthe MBT site the transport between the two sites will increase the carbon dioxide
emissions.
Evaluation of a gasification and pyrolysis plant.
Gasification & Pyrolysis
Advantages
Relatively clean method to process waste
30000 tonne waste / year would generate1.4MW energy
DisadvantagesNew technology in the UK
The waste needs pre treating
2 hectare site for dealing with 30000tonne waste /yr
Emits carbon dioxideTable 13 shows key points for Gasification/Pyroysis
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The purpose is to save water by re-using water from the building (grey water). This is
for example shower water for toilet flushing.
Gray water needs to be disinfected and system controls have to be carried outregularly to ensure a sufficient operation. It can be used in residential buildings for
toilet flushing but economical feasibility is difficult to achieve. [3]
Advantages
• Energy savings through water recovery
Disadvantages
• Low cost efficiency
• Requires high maintenance to ensure sufficient system operation
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Table 9 Showing rotor diameters and energy output ............................................................................ 141
Table 10 Kinetic energy in the wind for average wind speeds ............................................................. 141 Table 11 Technical Data: Energy output for turbines at different wind speeds ............. .............. ......... 143
Table 12 shows key points for MBT with AD ..................................................................................... 149
Table 13 shows key points for Gasification/Pyroysis ........................................................................... 149
Table 14 shows key points for Oscillating kiln .................................................................................... 150
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
[5] How Stuff Works [Homepage on Internet] How Stuff Works [Cited: 08-05-2007] Available from:
http://science.howstuffworks.com/wind-power1.htm
[6] Hoare Lea Consulting [Internal Report], Wind turbine installation preliminary feasibility study for
National marine aquarium, Bristol, Hoare Lea Consulting, 2005
[7] Danish Wind Industry Association [Homepage on Internet] Danish Wind Industry Association[Cited: 11-06-2008] Available from: http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wtrb/electric.htm
[8] Danish Wind Industry Association [Homepage on Internet] Danish Wind Industry Association
[Cited: 11-06-2008] Available from: http://www.windpower.org/en/stat/betzpro.htm
[9] Danish Wind Industry Association [Homepage on Internet] Danish Wind Industry Association
[Cited: 11-06-2008] Available from: http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wtrb/size.htm
[10] Energy Savings Trust, Factsheet 6 Small Scale Wind Energy, Energy Savings Trust, UK, 2005
[11] Danish Wind Industry Association [Homepage on Internet] Danish Wind Industry Association
[Cited: 11-06-2008] Available from: http://www.windpower.org/en/stat/unitsw.htm#anchor1345942
[12] Danish Wind Industry Association [Homepage on Internet] Danish Wind Industry Association
[Cited: 11-06-2008] Available from: http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wres/weibull.htm
[13] Energy Savings Trust, Factsheet 6 Small Scale Wind Energy, Energy Savings Trust, UK, 2005
[14] Building service journal, wind and the global warming imperative, BSJ, UK, 2006
[15] Hoare Lea Consulting [Internal Report], Wind turbine installation preliminary feasibility study for
[6] DEFRA, Waste implementation programme version 2, 2005 July, UK, DEFRA, p.15 [7] Viridor, The Exeter Area Energy for Waste Initiative, Don’t let Devon go to waste, 2006, UK,
Viridor p.06
[8] Viridor, The Exeter Area Energy for Waste Initiative, Don’t let Devon go to waste, 2006, UK,
This section shows some of the national targets the UK has set out to reduce its
carbon dioxide footprint.
Parts of the Mayors energy strategy and supplementary planning guidance are statedto show London’s attempt to be more energy efficiency and to emit less carbon
dioxide. The supplementary planning guidance also states that 10% carbon emission
reduction should be made from onsite renewable energies. The planning guidance
promotes sustainable design for building developments and states that the Mayors
preferred standard is to have zero carbon emission developments (ZED).
Excerpts of Part L1A are included because Part L1A is the building regulations
section on conservation of fuel and power for new dwelling developments. In Part
L1A is the regulations on emission reductions for new dwelling developments.
The last part of this section is on the government’s standard assessment procedure
SAP. This is the government’s method to assess dwelling developments energy
performance.
The Lots Road site is in this report assumed to be a new dwelling development.
In 2006 the new development standard changed to 20% carbon dioxide reduction
from the current building standard [14].
B8.1 National targets from the government
The Government has set out targets to reduce UK carbon dioxide emissions.
Excerpt of Government targets, form The Mayors Energy strategy 2004 [15]
• Reduce UK greenhouse gas emissions to 12.5 % below 1990 levels by 2008-
2012 (legally binding obligation of the Kyoto Protocol)
• Reduce UK carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to 20% below 1990 levels by2020. Aiming for CO2 emissions equivalent to 22-29 % below 2000 levels by
2020.
• A goal of putting the UK on a path to achieving a 60% reduction in CO2
emissions, relative to 2000, by 2050
• To meet 10% of UK electricity demand from renewable energy
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
Criterion1: To make sure the buildings do not have to high CO2 emissions. This
means the DER emissions shall be lower then the TER emissions. TER is a 20%reduction in emissions compared to a notional building. A notional building is
explained in the SAP section.
Criterion2: Limit flexibility in design so tradeoffs are discouraged. This means that
because renewable energies are implemented the building can not have poor design,
for example high heat gain and poor insulation and pass the energy efficient
requirements.
Criterion3: Elimination of AC, if possible, to save energy by countering internal heat
gains.
Criterion4: To achieve specified air permeability rate to limit excessive energy losses.
Criterion5: Awareness amongst residents as a part of sustainable design, for example
using low energy light bulbs.
Criterion 1: the prediction rate of CO2 from dwelling (the dwelling
emission rate DER) is not greater then Target emission rate (TER).
Criterion2:Building fabrics and building service performance arewithin limits.
Criterion3: limit the effect of solar gain in the summer.
Criterion 4: Air tightness is checked with pressure tests (NDT) and
commissioning.
Criterion 5: Awareness to residents to achieve energy efficiency in use
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The government’s method of assessing dwellings energy and environmental (CO2)
performance are with SAP. The important performance in order to get planning
permission is the CO2 emission rate. The dwelling carbon dioxide emission rate is
assessed by using a notional building as a reference frame with the same dimensionsas the dwelling development. Then the dwelling development is calculated and
compared to the notional building regarding to the CO2 emission rate. The dwelling
development should perform better, lower emission rate, then the notional building.
According to the new building standards the target is a carbon dioxide emission rate
reduction of 20%. [22]
The total carbon dioxide emissions are calculated in CO2 kg/year for the development.
It is then divided with the area (m2) of the dwelling to get the dwelling CO2 emission
rate (CO2 kg/m2 /year). If renewable technologies are used the CO2 emissions saved by
the renewable technologies are subtracted from the total CO2 emissions to get a lower
dwelling carbon dioxide emission rate.
The energy performance is assessed through how large the energy demand is for a
dwelling (kWh/year) multiplied with the cost/kWh to get the total energy cost. The
total energy cost is then multiplied with a cost deflator, the value of the deflator is
found in the SAP documents. The SAP guide tables then provide the SAP rating
number.
The rating for the energy performance is between 1 to100 (high score equals good
performance e.g. low energy cost per year).
SAP work as a general assessment tool for CO2 emissions this means that it is
independent of the resident’s energy use or usage of the floor area. It only depends on
general factors of energy performance such as building ventilation and energy sources
used.
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London
The conversion factor to get the energy output needed for biomass CHP is 0,194
(kgCO2 / kWh) for heating with natural gas and 0.422 (kgCO2 / kWh) for electricity.
50 % carbon dioxide reduction per year is 2,000,000 kg CO2 / year
The biomass CHP will have an efficiency of 80% and a power to heat ratio of 1:1.286
assumed same as for the CHP engine. [8]
When the biomass CHP engine is assumed to a 550kW system and to run for 5000
[25] hours the energy output will be:
539.3 x 5000 + 539.3 x 5000 x 1.286 = 6164.2 MWh/year Equation (56)
It is verified by earlier CO2 reduction calculations:
(50/21.09) x 2600 = 6164.1 MWh/year Equation(57)
The carbon emission reduction for a year is then:
(( 2696500 x 0.422) + (3467699/0.78 x 0.194))
= 2000401 kgCO2 / year Equation (58)
B10.5 Solar water heating
The conversion factor to get the energy output needed for solar water heating is 0,194(kgCO2 / kWh). That is the carbon dioxide emission factor for heating with natural
gas.
50 % carbon dioxide reduction per year is 2,000,000 kg CO2 / year
Figure 1 Excerpts from the Mayors energy strategy ............. ............. ............ .............. ............. ............ 182 Figure 2 The Mayors energy hierarchy ................................................................................................ 182 Figure 3 Sustainable design factors ...................................................................................................... 183 Figure 4 Excerpt from Part L1A ........................................................................................................... 184 Figure 5 Excerpt from Part L ............ .............. ............. ............. ............. .............. ............. ............ ........ 185
Appendix B List of Tables
Table 1 Ccost per kilowatt or square meter of the energy technologies ........................ .............. ......... 173 Table 2 Showing cost for energy systems. ........................................................................................... 173 Table 3 showing technical data for block JJ ......................................................................................... 187 Table 4 showing technical data for block HH ...................................................................................... 188 Table 5 showing technical data for block GG ...................................................................................... 188 Table 6 showing technical data for block FF........................................................................................ 189 Table 7 showing technical data for block EE ....................................................................................... 189 Table 8 showing technical data for block DD ...................................................................................... 190 Table 9 showing technical data for block CC ....................................................................................... 190 Table 10 showing technical data for block BB ..................................................................................... 191 Table 11 showing technical data for block AA .................................................................................... 191
7/28/2019 An Energy Strategy for a Residential Scheme in London