Top Banner
An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick
20

An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Jan 01, 2016

Download

Documents

Jason Gilbert
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls

A Research ProposalMatt Bostick

Page 2: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Background: Owls of Maryland

Five species of owls live in or pass through Maryland.1.Barn owls2.Great Horned owl3.Barred owls4.Eastern Screech owl5.Northern Saw-whet owl

Barred Owl

Page 3: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Adaptations as predators

Owls have special adaptations that enable them to hunt at night.

Large and fixed eyes with binocular vision and good depth perception.

Owls have developed an incredibly flexible neck that allows them to turn their head 270 degrees in both directions.

Their eyes are also extremely light sensitive, allowing them to see well at night.

Barred Owl

Page 4: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Owls as predators

Owls rely on silent flight to surprise their prey.

The shape of the owl’s flight feathers muffles the sound wind makes as it flows past them. Saw-Whet Owl

Page 5: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

An idealized food pyramid

Page 6: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Owl Pellets – What Are They?

Owls do not have teeth for grinding and cannot pass whole bone and claws through their digestive tract safely.

The protein enzymes and strong acids that occur in the digestive tract of raptors do not digest the entire meal. The relatively weak stomach muscles of the bird form the undigested fur, bones, feather etc. into a bolus (or wet slimy pellets).

The undigested portions may include beaks, claws, scales, or insect exoskeletons.

Page 7: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Purpose: To analyze the frequency of

prey items caught by the 5 species of owls common to Maryland

To determine if the frequency of prey items is significantly different between the species observed.

Page 8: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Owl PelletsI examine owl 3 owl pellets from each species in order to estimate the frequency of prey items eaten.

Page 9: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Species diversity has two components:

4%

6%

8%

14%

17%

18%

33%

7. Bird

6. Rat

5. Gopher

4. Squirrel

3. Mouse

2. Vole

1. Shrew

1. Species richness: how many different species are present in a habitat

2. Relative Frequency: total number of individuals of each species present given in %

Page 10: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

HypothesisI hypothesize that the frequency of prey items found in the owl pellets will be significantly different between species.

Page 11: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Materials I need:

3 Owl Pellets from each species

Dissecting Pan Forceps Probe Metric Ruler Bone Identification

Sheets Gloves

Page 12: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Common Name

Genus Freq Found

Vole Microtus 70%

Shrew Sorex 20%

Mole Scapanus 5%

Deer Mouse

Peromyscus 2%

House mouse

Mus 2%

Rat Rattus 1%

(small bird)

Hirundo rare

Methods- Bone Sorting Chart

Page 13: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Type and # of bones

Vole Shrew Mole Rat Mice Bird

Skulls

Jaws

Shoulder blade

Front legs

Hips

Hind legs

Assorted ribs

Assorted vertebrae

# of animals

Page 14: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Chi-Square

is a statistical test used to determine whether your experimentally observed results are consistent with your hypothesis.

Page 15: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

When using chi-square in biology, there is some vocabulary we must know:Hypothesis = a proposed explanation of

an observed phenomenon

Observed results = what you can observe during the course of an experiment

Expected results = what you expect to see based on your hypothesis (predictions)

Page 16: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Our final formula:

X2 = chi-square(o - e) = observed minus expected [sometimes you may see this represented with a d which

means the difference between the expected and observed results]

e = expected resultso = observed results

and = sum of

The formula includes:The formula includes:

)(2)(2

eeox

Page 17: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

I will use a table to assist in my data organization.

Species of OwlObserved

VolesExpected

VolesO-E (O-E)2 (O-E)2

E

Great Horned 6 4 2 4 1

Screech 5 4 1 1 0.25

Barn 1 4 -3 6 1.5

Page 18: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Chi – Square Critical Values

Page 19: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.

Expected ResultsI expect that the results from my chi-square analysis will indicate that significant differences in the frequency of prey items will exist between the 5 owl species studied.

Page 20: An Analysis of The Differences In The Frequency of Prey Items Caught by Maryland Owls A Research Proposal Matt Bostick.