-
Metcalf & Eddu_ X /, // An Air & Water Technologies
Company
004609-0018-010-014
July 2, 1996
Mr. David J. Newton Remedial Project Manager USEPA Region I
(HBO) JFK Federal Building Boston, Massachusetts 02203-2211
Subject: Contract No. 68-W9-0036 Work Assignment No. 18-1LA5
Rose Hill Regional Landfill RI/FS Landfill Mining Memorandum
Dear Dave:
As per your request, enclosed is a memorandum presenting
information compiled by M&E related to Landfill Mining for your
review prior to the July 10, 1996 meeting with RIDEM.
If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to call
me.
Very truly yours,
METCALF & EDDY, INC.
Deborah M. Simone Project Manager
Attachment
cc: M. Dennen, RIDEM C. Hagger, M&E (letter only) D. Peters,
M&E B. Wyskowski, M&E N. Bergeron, M&E WA#18-1LA5
30 Harvard Mill Square Wakeheld. MA 01880-5371 • Mailing Address
PO Box 4071 Wakefield. MA 01880-5371
TEL 617-246-5200 FAX 617-245-6293
-
ROSE HILL LANDFILL MINING MEMORANDUM
July 1996
As per EPA request, a preliminary evaluation was performed to
consider landfill mining as a
potential remedial option for the Rose Hill Regional Landfill.
This memorandum presents
general information on landfill mining, application of landfill
mining at Rose Hill, the phases
of a mining project, and a discussion of the advantages and
disadvantages of landfill mining.
General Information on Landfill Mining
Landfill mining, also known as landfill reclamation, is a
process in which non-hazardous waste
domestic landfills are excavated with the aim of separating and
utilizing the waste, recyclables
and soil. The reclaimed land can then be reused as necessary.
The goal of the project is most
often to extend the life of the landfill by removing some of the
waste completely or just
repacking the waste to free up more landfill space. The
excavated waste is sometimes used as
fuel for waste to energy plants, the recyclables may raise a
modest revenue and the recovered
soil can be reused. The process has been in use since 1986 in at
least four states Florida,
Pennsylvania, New York and Connecticut. Several advantages and
disadvantages of this
technology are listed in Table 1.
In general, the landfill mining is a simple process. The
equipment used primarily consists of
backhoes or excavators, dump trucks and various screening
equipment. Initially the waste is
1
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
ADVANTAGES
Extend the life of the landfill by
increasing the amount of available
space.
Reduce the closure costs by reducing
the area of the landfill.
Transfer of waste from unlined
landfill to a lined landfill reduces
liability.
Reclaimed land may be converted to
other uses such as municipal
recreational parks.
Mined waste can be used as a fuel
supply for waste-to-energy plants to
produce electricity.
Recovered soil may be used as
landfill cover material, capping soil
or, if suitable, for off site fill.
Revenue may be generated from sale
of recyclable materials.
DISADVANTAGES
Not all landfills are suitable for
mining implementation.
Excavation may unearth hazardous
materials which could incur
expensive disposal costs.
Subsoil and groundwater
contamination may limit the
possibilities for land reuse or require
remediation.
Odors and landfill gases could be
emitted to the atmosphere and affect
the surrounding community.
Available screening equipment is not
made to handle the diverse physical
sizes and shapes found in landfill
waste.
Difficult working conditions
associated with excavating a landfill
and the changing weather conditions.
Possibility of contaminant release
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
sorted through a large bar screen, usually with 3-inch spacing
to screen out the larger pieces
such as refrigerators, washing machines, etc. The piles are
further classified using a trommel
screen. Further screening is used as necessary to attain a
higher level of purity. Magnetic
drums may be used to help separate recyclable metals.
Issues of concern for landfill mining include: health and
safety, contaminant releases and
working conditions. During excavation of a landfill, the
possibility of unearthing a hazardous
waste or disease causing material is possible. Well trained
workers are needed to conduct this
potentially difficult waste management. The issue of odor
release is also a major concern for
the community.
The landfill mining process is comprised of two phases. Phase I
is the pilot study/feasibility
analysis and Phase II is the excavation/waste separation
process.
Phase I - Pilot Study
Landfill mining is a site-specific technology. The conditions at
any given landfill dictate the
feasibility of using this process successfully. Since not every
landfill is a probable candidate for
landfill mining, some information must be gathered initially and
used to determine the
applicability of the technology to each particular site. This
initial data gathering and analysis
is performed in the pilot study/feasibility phase.
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
The pilot study information gathering consists of historical
reviews and onsite investigative
operations. Historical reviews would include such activities as
reviewing landfill daily logs and
evaluating available aerial photographs taken over the lifespan
of the landfill. The onsite
investigation would involve test pits and drilling down into the
landfill to characterize the waste
and sample the soil. The use of test pits or drilling would
depend on the depth of the waste
layer in the landfill. The number of test pits or boreholes
would depend on the size of the
landfill and the degree of confidence that would be required to
characterize the landfill.
Some of the information that would be obtained from these
activities include: 1) the type and
quantities of wastes in the landfill; 2) the location and
concentration of various wastes; 3) the
condition of the waste; 4) the depth of waste in all parts of
the landfill; 5) the depth to
groundwater; and 6) the possibility of hazardous waste existing
in the landfill.
This information would then be evaluated to determine if
landfill mining is feasible at the site.
Some of the conditions that would present a significant obstacle
to the success of landfill mining
include the presence of wastes below the groundwater table, the
presence of hazardous waste,
and the possibility of releasing large amounts of landfill gases
and objectionable odors.
Associated activities for the pilot study would include the
preparation of a site health and safety
plan, an air monitoring plan, an operational plan and a
hazardous materials management plan
in case a hazardous material or condition is found.
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
An economic evaluation is also performed to determine the
feasibility of the technology. The
cost of the project is most likely to be the major decision
making criteria for the implementation
of the process. A cost benefit analysis would compare the
projected costs for the existing
landfill (such as a closure or a cap) with the costs associated
landfill mining and the anticipated
savings (such as reducing the size of the cap needed or
extending the life of an active landfill).
Markets and disposal for material to be excavated during Phase
II would also be initially
identified during the pilot study phase of the project.
Phase II - Excavation
The results of the pilot study will dictate the next steps. If
the project is deemed feasible, it may
continue into the excavation phase.
For the implementation of a full scale project, the health and
safety plan, air monitoring plan,
hazardous waste management plan and operational plan from the
pilot study would be expanded.
Equipment needed would include a backhoe or excavator, dump
truck, and screening equipment.
The size and type of screening equipment would be determined by
the information found in the
pilot study.
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
Landfill Mining at Rose Hill Regional Landfill
Landfill mining is being considered for the bulky waste disposal
area at the Rose Hill Regional
Landfill. This 11-acre disposal area which contains an estimated
100,000 yd3 of material is
located east of the solid waste area and southwest of the sewage
sludge area approximately 200
feet east of Mitchell Brook and 250 feet west of the Saugatucket
River. This landfill was in
operation from 1978 - 1983. Solid waste was also reportedly
disposed of during this period
between closure of the solid waste area and construction of the
transfer station. Currently some
vegetation, primarily grasses overlying natural fill materials,
provide cover for this area (M&E,
Final RI report, 1994).
A landfill cap is required for this disposal area and applying
this technology to this site might
reduce the area of the landfill and thereby reduce the size of
the cap needed. In order to
determine the conditions at Rose Hill's bulky waste disposal
area, a pilot study would have to
be performed. The order of magnitude cost for performing this
pilot study is estimated at
approximately $75,000.
Depending on the pilot study results and the goals of the
project, the entire or a portion of the
bulky waste disposal area would be excavated. The material
unearthed would be separated by
the screening equipment. Most likely the only material worth
salvaging would be the soil which
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
could be reused for the capping process. For simplicity, it is
assumed that the remainder of the
excavated waste would be transported to Rhode Island's Central
Landfill.
Advantages to Landfill Mining at Rose Hill
Some of the advantages that could be expected from applying this
technology are summarized
below.
• Mining this area might reduce the area size that would need
the Subtitle D Landfill cap.
Reducing the size of the intended landfill cap would result in a
capital cost savings.
• Mining would also recover soil which could be reused in the
capping process. Again,
this would result in a reduced capital cost to build the
landfill cap.
• A market may be found for the recyclable material and a small
amount of revenue could
be generated.
The most important advantage to implementing landfill mining at
this site is reducing the size
of the bulky waste disposal area and consequently the size of
the landfill cap. However, it is
not certain whether or not this size reduction is possible. The
ground water table is shallow in
this area and it is quite possible that much of the waste is
below the water level. Excavating
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
below the water table would require dewatering measures.
Dewatering a landfill with a
significant possibility of hazardous contamination would be very
expensive. For the cap area
to be reduced, all the waste including that below the water
table would have to be removed. The
excavation cost with any required dewatering and treatment
measures could far outweigh the
possible cap size reduction savings.
Disadvantages to Landfill Mining at Rose Hill
Some of the disadvantages to applying landfill mining technology
to Rose Hill are:
• Certainty in type and quantity of waste is not known. There is
always a possibility that
hazardous materials may be encountered.
• Due to the high water table, it is most likely that dewatering
and treatment of the liquid
would be necessary during excavation operations. Construction of
an on-site treatment
plant to treat the liquid would be costly.
• Excavated recyclables or materials to be sent to Central
Landfill would have to be rinsed
off to remove any residual accumulations on the material and
this rinsate would require
on- or off-site treatment.
8
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
• All waste and any contaminated soil must be removed in order
to reduce the area of the
cap required. Any wastes left behind would require a Subtitle D
landfill cap. The high
water table may not allow all the waste to be excavated and
consequently the size of the
cap would not be significantly reduced.
• Landfill mining does not have strong public support.
Excavation of the landfill could
cause the release of and/or further migration of potentially
hazardous materials or noxious
odors. Nearby residents are usually opposed to use of this
technology for the purposes
of reopening the landfill for extended operations.
The primary goal of this project would be to reduce the size of
the bulky waste disposal area.
However, several conditions exist that would inhibit the ability
to achieve this goal. Since the
area is in a low lying region and next to a river, there exists
a good possibility that one of these
inhibitory conditions would be a high water table. Without
dewatering measures the possibility
of excavating all the waste, including that below the water
table, is small. In addition to the
excavation problems is the high cost for treatment of liquids
during dewatering operations.
Estimated Order of Magnitude Costs for Implementing Landfill
Mining at Rose Hill
An estimate of the order of magnitude costs for conducting
landfill mining at the bulky waste
disposal area is presented below.
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo Julv 1996
Activity Cost
Phase I - Pilot Study S 75.000
Phase n - Excavation Landfill Operations
Excavation/Sorting S 176.000(1)
Trammeling S 53.000(1>
Fuel $ 23.000(1)
Maintenance/Odor control $ 11.000U)
Refuse Transport $ 200,000 (1)
Administration/Compliance $ 27,000(1)
Central Landfill Tipping Fees $ 1,300,000
Groundwater Treatment Plant (100 gpm) $ 1,000,000
Subtitle D Cap S 895.000 (2)
(50% estimated reduction in costs) Total $ 2,865,000
These estimated costs are based on excavating an average of
2,478 yd3 per week for a total of
100,000 yd3 (Personal Communication Brooks Norris of Lancaster
County Solid Waste
Authority, 1996; M&E, Final RI Report 1994). It is assumed
that half of the excavated material
would be sent to Central Landfill (tipping fee is $52/ton;
assuming 2 cu. yd. = 1 ton). It is
assumed that dewatering will be necessary five (5) days a week
and ten (10) hours a day for
forty (40) weeks and liquid from dewatering operations would be
treated on-site using a
groundwater treatment plant. For estimating purposes, it is
assumed that the size of the cap will
be reduced by 50%. Thus, the cost of $1,079,000 for a Subtitle D
cap as estimated for coverage
of the waste disposal (approximately 7 acres) may be considered
to be reduced by 50%.
10
-
Rose Hill Landfill Mining Memo July 1996
(1) Personal Communication Brooks Norris of Lancaster County
Solid Waste Authority, 1996
(2) M&E, preliminary calculations of Subtitle D cap
costs.
Conclusions
The estimated cost to implement the landfill mining project at
the bulky waste landfill is
approximately $2,865,000 while the estimated cost to install a
Subtitle D landfill cap in the
existing bulky waste landfill area is approximately $1,079,000
(M&E, preliminary calculations).
Based on these order of magnitude cost estimates, applying
landfill mining technology at this site
may be less than economical. The benefits which may result from
mining the landfill (reducing
the size of the cap) do not overcome the costs associated with
implementing this technology.
Therefore, landfill mining the bulky waste disposal area at Rose
Hill Regional Landfill does not
appear to be a cost effective technology. In addition, community
concerns may also discourage
consideration of this as a possible remedial technology for
screening in the Rose Hill Regional
Landfill Draft Final Feasibility Study. Based on the information
presented in this memorandum,
it is recommended that landfill mining be eliminated from future
consideration as a remedial
option for the Rose Hill Regional Landfill.
11