Ambient and Cognitive Networks Youn-Hee Han [email protected] May 2009 Korea University of Technology and Education Laboratory of Intelligent Network http://link.kut.ac.kr
Jan 03, 2016
Ambient and Cognitive Networks
Youn-Hee [email protected]
May 2009
Korea University of Technology and EducationLaboratory of Intelligent Network
http://link.kut.ac.kr
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Ambient Networks
2/29
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
EU’s FP6 (6th Framework Program) 유럽연합의 6 차 연구개발 프로그램 (2002~2006) Goal & Vision
유럽단일연구공간 (ERA: European Research Area) 의 실현
7 개 중점 연구 분야와 IST, WWI, Ambient Networks 의 관계
EU’s FP6 & Ambient and Cognitive Networks
3/29
연구 분야 예산 (Euro)
1. 생명과학 , 게노믹스 , 생명공학 22 억
2. 정보사회기술(Information Society Technologies, IST)
36 억
3. 나노기술 및 나노과학 , 새로운 생산공정 및 디바이스 13 억
4. 항공우주 10.75 억
5. 식품의 질 및 안전성 6.85 억
6. 지속가능한 발전 , 전지구적 변화 및 생태계 21.2 억
7. 지식기반사회에서의 시민과 통치 2.25 억
기타 13.2 억
계 132.85 억
…
WWI (Wireless World Initiative, 2004~)
yyy
XXX[IST 내의 통합 관리 프로젝트 ]
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Ambient Networks (AN) A software-driven dynamic network integration solution
over any access technology and any type of network Phase I (2004-2005)
Fundamental concepts & the overall architecture of ANs Phase II (2006-2007)
The engineering of the overall solution Develop real prototypes
Overall Review Fatna Belqasmi, Roch H. Glitho, and Rachida Dssouli,
“Ambient Network Composition,” IEEE Network, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 6-12, July/August 2008.
Overview of Ambient Networks
4/29
[Ambient]: existing or present on all sides: of the surrounding area or environment
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Four innovations (design paradigm) of AN
Overview of Ambient Networks
5/29
Network Composition
Enhanced Mobility
Network Heterogeneity Support
Context Awareness
+
To provide common control functions to a wide range of different applications and air interface technologies
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Ambient Control Space (ACS)
Technology of Ambient Networks
6/29
Ambient Network Interface (ANI): Standardized single interface to connect the network instead of just connection of nodes: Offer a simple plug & play connection
Ambient Service Interfaces (ASI): Even in a composed Ambient Network, only a single homogeneous control space is visible to external entities : An application or service will always find the same environment
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Network Composition (1/2) Network Integration
Involved networks merge intoone common network
E.g. a new PAN creation integrating two different PANs
Control Delegation One AN delegates certain control
functions to the other AN E.g. 3GPP-WLAN interworking:
WLAN delegates authentication, authorization and charging to 3GPP network
Network Interworking Cooperation but no control delegation E.g. dynamic roaming agreements
Technology of Ambient Networks
7/29
Incr
easi
ng c
ontr
ol p
lane
inte
rwor
king
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Network Composition (2/2)
Technology of Ambient Networks
8/29
Overlay Control Space
AmbientConnectivity
FE 4FE 3
FE5
CompositionFE
FE1
FE6FE2
Ambient Control SpaceAmbient Control Space
AmbientConnectivity
FE 4FE 3
FE5
CompositionFE
FE1
FE6FE2
Ambient Control SpaceAmbient Control Space
GANS: Generic Ambient Networks Signaling
GANS
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Generic Link layer (GLL) for a Multi-Radio Access
Technology of Ambient Networks
9/29
Generic Link Interface (GLI): It provides compatible radio link layers for different radio access technologies: A reconfiguration of the GLL (generic link layer) due to a change of radio access technology will be seamless
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Scenario 1
Scenarios of Ambient Networks
10/29
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Scenario 2
Scenarios of Ambient Networks
11/29
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Active Research and Much Results
Selected Review #1 Instant Media Services for
Users on the Move
Research Results of Ambient Networks
12/29
M. Vorwerk, S. Schuetz, R. Aguero, J. Choque, S. Schmid, M. Kleis, M. Kampmann, M. Erkoc, “Ambient networks in practice - instant media services for users on the move,” 2nd International Conference on TRIDENTCOM, 2006.
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Selected Review #2 New Handover Strategy & Business Map
Research Results of Ambient Networks
13/29
P. Poyhonen, J. Tuononen, T. Haitao, O. Strandberg, “Study of Handover Strategies for Multi-Service and Multi-Operator Ambient Networks,” 2nd International Conference on CHINACOM, 2007.
DS: Discovered Sets (of Access Networks)CST: Candidate Sets based on Terminal’s policy CSN: Candidate Sets based on Network’s policy AS: Finally selected Active Sets
Business Map
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Selected Review #3 Ambient Network Advertising Broker
Research Results of Ambient Networks
14/29
L. Ho, J. Markendahl, M. Berg, “Business Aspects of Advertising and Discovery Concepts in Ambient Networks,” IEEE 17th International Symposium on PIMRC, 2006.
Access Broker (Auction-based): Dynamic allocation per Call
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Cognitive Networks
15/29
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Three motivating problems for Cognitive Networks Complex
Large numbers of highly interconnected, interacting elements and instances of self-organization and emergent behavior
Network need to be able to deal with and adapt to complex environment with minimal or zero user interaction
Motivation
16/29
A school of fish
A termite mound
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Three motivating problems for Cognitive Networks Wireless and Its heterogeneity
Large numbers of standards IEEE 802.11, Bluetooth, WiMAX, CDMA2000, UMTS…
Ad-hoc networks are highly dynamic should be capable of self-organization In research papers, simulation is usually used because of the
difficulty in using forms of analysis Difficulty in QoS of Layered Architecture
People wants a sort of end-to-end guarantees It is a very difficult research area because most all
networking stacks do not operate on an end-to-end paradigm.
Current approaches are typically reactive.
Motivation
17/29
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Cognitive Network (CN) A network composed of elements that, through learning
and reasoning, dynamically adapt to varying network conditions in order to optimize end-to-end performance
Features Decisions are made to meet the requirements of the network
as a whole (not individual network components) A Cognitive Process
perceive conditions, plan, decide, and act on those conditions
Definition
18/29
Global Internet Map(www.siencedaily.com)
[by Ryan Thomas @ Virginia Tech., 2005]
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Similarities Operates in parallel to stack Increases information available to participating layers Optimizes on goals that require multiple layers to achieve
Differences Cognition (as opposed to reactive, localized schemes) Multiple and End-to-end goals (as opposed to single goal at
layer level)
Cognitive Network vs. Cross-layering
19/29
[by Ryan Thomas @ Virginia Tech.]
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Basic Decision Model OODA Loop [John Boyd] Decision based on observation of
network environments
Implementation It depends on
Goals, Controllable Network Elements, System Structure, States
Critical Design Issues Behavior: Selfish vs. Cooperation Computational: Level of ignorance Physical: Amount of control
Cognition Process
20/29
[by Ryan Thomas @ Virginia Tech.]
분석 및 계획
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Input from Requirements Layer End-to-End Goals Cognitive Specification Language
Converts end-to-end goals into cognitive elements goals
Cognitive Elements Adapt and learns to make decisions
that meet end-to-end goals
Software Adaptable Network (SAN) API Configurable Elements
Points of network control for cognitive process Network Status Sensors
Reads status of the network
Cognitive Network Framework
21/29
[by Ryan Thomas @ Virginia Tech.]
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Cooperative Mobile Robots
Usage Scenarios
Case Study: Mobile Robots & Sensor Network
22/29
[University of Tübingen][USC @ LA]
[Disaster Area]
[Exploring the unknown]
[Robot Army]
Environmental Robotics
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
How to MOVE? Cognition (Perception) of Obstacles and Other Sensors
Supersonic Wave, Artificial Vision, … Force based on Potential Fields
ForceAccelerationVelocityPosition
Sensor Robot Mobility
23/29
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
How to expand the covering area? A self-deployment algorithm to achieve the max coverage
level Cognition of coverage level in distributed manner
Coverage Level
24/29
Coverage Level: 28.37% Coverage Level: 76.14% Coverage Level: 98.56%
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
How to make the network connection robust? A self-deployment algorithm to achieve the max
connectivity level Cognition of connectivity level in distributed manner
Connectivity Level
25/29
Avg. # of Neighbor: 2.6 Avg. # of Neighbor: 3.32
Coverage Level Connectivity Level
trade-off
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
How to make the overlay level high? An optimized grouping algorithm to achieve the max
energy efficiency
Overlay Level
26/29
70 Active Sensors
Active - Group #1(of 35 Active Sensors)
Sleep - Group #2(of 35 Sleep Sensors)
Active - Group #2(of 35 Active Sensors)
Sleep - Group #1(of 35 Sleep Sensors)
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
Cognition Scheme in Mobile Sensor Networks
27/29
Sensing Areas,Obstacles, Other Sensors,
Environment Status…
Area Border LocationObstacle Location, Other Sensor Location, Sensing
Range, Communication Range, Current Levels of Coverage, Connectivity, and
Overlay
Optimization Algorithms to
maximize “Coverage Level”,
“Connectivity Level”, and“Overlay Level”
Autonomic Self-deployment of
Sensors
New Position of Sensor Robots
- Heuristic Algorithms (Greedy Algorithm…)- Intelligent Algorithms (Genetic Algorithm…)
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
A. Howard, M. J. Mataric, and G. S. Sukhatme, “Mobile Sensor Network Deployment using Potential Fields: A distributed, scalable solution to the area coverage problem,” The 6th International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotics Systems (DARS02), June 2002.
Y. Zou and K. Chakrabarty, “Sensor Deployment and Target Localization based on Virtual Forces,” IEEE INFOCOM 2003, Vol. 2, pp. 1293-1303, March 2003.
S. Poduri and G. S. Sukhatme, “Constrained Coverage for Mobile Sensor Networks,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 165–172, May 2004.
G. Wang, G. Cao and T. L. Porta, “Movement-assisted Sensor Deployment,” In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2004, Vol. 4, pp. 2469-2479, March 2004.
B. Liu, P. Brass, O. Dousse, P. Nain and D, Towsley, “Mobility Improves Coverage of Sensor Networks,” ACM MobiHoc 2005, pp. 300-308, May 2005.
J. Wu and S. Yang, “SMART: A Scan-Based Movement-Assisted Sensor Deployment Method In Wireless Sensor Networks,” In Proc. of INFOCOM 2005, pp.2313-2324, March 2005.
G. Wang, G. Cao, T. L. Porta and W. Zhang, “Sensor Relocation In Mobile Sensor Networks,” In Proc. of INFOCOM 2005, pp. 2302-2312, March 2005.
H. Yu, J. Iyer, H. Kim, E. J. Kim, K. H. Yum and P. S. Mah, “Assuring K-Coverage in the Presence of Mobility in Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM 2006 (selected for best papers), 2006.
D. Wang, J. Liu and Qian Zhang, “Mobility-Assisted Sensor Networking for Field Coverage,” In Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM '07. pp. 1190-1194, Nov. 2007.
Wang, H. Wu, and N.-F. Tzeng, “Cross-layer Protocol Design and Optimization for Delay/Fault-tolerant Mobile Sensor Networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 809-819, June 2008
References of Mobile Sensor Networks
28/29
2009 미래인터넷 표준기술 워크숍
[Demo]
29/29
Demo animation for mobile sensor network deployment