Top Banner
The Amazonas State REDD+ System: a nested approach proposal for the Amazon Supported by: Developed by:
23
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Amazonas jnr workshop

The Amazonas State REDD+ System: a nested approach proposal for the Amazon

Supported by:

Developed by:

Page 2: Amazonas jnr workshop

A Nested Approach for REDD+ in

the Amazon

A proposal from the Brazilian GCF States (Acre, Amazonas, Pará, Mato

Grosso and Tocantins)

Page 3: Amazonas jnr workshop

Verified Deforestation 1996-2012 (km2)

Baseline NPCC 2006-2020 (km2)

Reductions Targets NPCC 2006-2020 (km2)

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

0

30000

Years

Def

ore

stat

ion

(K

m2

)

3.544.438.206 tCO2 (2006 – 2012)

NPCC: Baseline and targets for REDD+ in the Amazon (2006-2020)

9.274.214.738 tCO2

Page 4: Amazonas jnr workshop

How to share REDD+ across the Amazon ?

Page 5: Amazonas jnr workshop

Key issues for consideration

The amazon region has different government policies, land rights, stakeholders, drivers and agents of deforestation… “one size does not fits all”

Amazon states have autonomy and are moving towards implementation of their REDD+ programs

It is necessary to avoid double counting between projects, jurisdictions and national programs

Maximize funding opportunities from different sources: domestic, international, public and private, market and non market based mechanisms…

Page 6: Amazonas jnr workshop

A National REDD+ Commission should define:

ProjectA

Project B

Project C

20% 80%

Monitoring and Fiscalization

Sustainable Activities

Increase agriculture efficiency

Sustainable Forest Management

Federal Government

4%

24%

2%

3%

27%

27%

9%

3% 1%

Alocation UREDD - 2006/2020

Acre

Amazonas

Amapá

Maranhão

Mato Grosso

Pará

Rondônia

Roraima

Tocantins

X% of UREDDs for Markets

Y% of UREDDs retail for domestic and

performance based payments

Amazon Fund

1, 854 GtCO2

9.274.214.738 tCO2 UREDD (2006 - 2020)

7,419 GtCO2

Page 7: Amazonas jnr workshop

Forest C Stocks

(km2)

Forest C Stocks

(%)

Reduced

Deforestatioin

(km2)

Reduced

Deforestation in

relation to

Reduced

deforestation of

Brazilian Amazon

(%)

CREDD (%)

Acre 132.048,00 3,9% 203,52 3,8% 3,8%

Amazonas 1.459.969,00 43,1% 81,82 1,5% 22,3%

Amapá 117.188,00 3,5% - 7,29 -0,1% 1,7%

Maranhão 92.997,00 2,7% 290,93 5,4% 4,1%

Mato Grosso 338.066,00 10,0% 3.324,13 61,9% 36,0%

Pará 911.664,00 26,9% 656,81 12,2% 19,6%

Rondônia 141.566,00 4,2% 726,32 13,5% 8,9%

Roraima 161.202,00 4,8% 9,64 0,2% 2,5%

Tocantins 31.008,00 0,9% 82,56 1,5% 1,2%

TOTAL 3.385.708,00 100% 5.368,44 100% 100%

2006

(historical deforestation rate) –

(verified deforestation) by 2006

(Source: PRODES)

UREDD

Reduced deforestation by Brazilian Amazon States, in relation

to reduced deforestation of

Brazilian Amazon (%)

U-REDD: Allocation by Brazilian Amazon State, based

in a stock-flow mechanism, considering the share of 50%

to flow and 50% to stocks

Fontes: Cattaneo. A, 2009 ; OSIRIS, 2009 ; BANTER, 2010.

Forestry Area(km2) by 2006 (Brazilian

Amazon) (Source: BANTER)

Forest Carbon Stocks by State in

relation to Brazilian Amazon

forest carbon stocks (%)

Page 8: Amazonas jnr workshop

Alocations for Amazon GCF States (2010 – 2020)

4%

24%

2%

3%

27%

27%

9%

3% 1%

UREDD allocations - 2010/2020

Acre

Amazonas

Amapá

Maranhão

Mato Grosso

Pará

Rondônia

Roraima

Tocantins

297.724.820 tCO2

1.792.669.833 tCO2

92.147.269 tCO2

2.153.669.960 tCO2

1.959.488.986 tCO2

73.425.938 tCO2

Fonte: Idesam 2012

Page 9: Amazonas jnr workshop
Page 10: Amazonas jnr workshop
Page 11: Amazonas jnr workshop

U-REDD AM (2006 - 2020)

State Government

(29%)

24% = 1.792.669.833 t CO2

Buffer (UREDD geradas entre 2006 – 2009) – 297.205.286 tCO2

Call for projects (30%)

Municipal Governments

(10%)

Independent REDD+ projects

Environmental Management

Monitoring and fiscalization

State Protected Areas (14%)

Rural Settlements (15%)

Indigenous Lands (16%)

Page 12: Amazonas jnr workshop

U-REDD AM (2006 - 2020)

State Government

(29%)

24% = 1.786.671.218 t CO2

Buffer (UREDD geradas entre 2006 – 2009) – 297.205.286 tCO2

Call for projects (30%)

Municipal Governments

(10%)

Independent REDD+ projects

Environmental Management

Monitoring and Fiscalization

State Protected Areas (14%)

• Historical Deforestation Rates (flow): Allocation to

consolidated deforestation frontier

• Forest Carbon Stocks (stock): Balanced distribution to non-

threatened areas

• Future Deforestation Risk Map: Allocation to future

deforestation frontiers

Rural Settlements (15%)

Indigenous Lands (16%)

Page 13: Amazonas jnr workshop
Page 14: Amazonas jnr workshop

State Protected Area (RDS Rio Madeira)

Forestry Area: 226.273 ha Historical rate of deforestation: 251 ha/year Projected deforestation: 16.548 ha (2011 – 2020)

Rural Settlement (PA Juma)

Forestry Area: 608.680 ha Historical rate of deforestation: 6.884 ha/year Projected deforestation: 145.923 ha (2011 - 2020)

IL Médio Rio Negro

Forestry Area: 989.277 ha Historical rate of deforestation: 226 ha/year Projected deforestation: 12.138 ha (2011 – 2020)

Page 15: Amazonas jnr workshop

I.L. Médio Rio Negro

Step 1. Carbon Stocks (30%):

I.L Médio Rio Negro: 989.277,34 hectares of forests

Amazonas State: 123.560.872 hectares of forests

I.L. Médio Rio Negro has 0,8% of Amazonas´s forest carbon stocks

Step 2. Historical deforestation (30%):

I.L. Médio Rio Negro: 226 ha/year

Amazonas State: 81.030 ha/year

I.L. Médio Rio Negro represents 0,28% of Amazonas´s historical deforestation

Page 16: Amazonas jnr workshop

Step 4. Consolidation

Allocation to I.L. Médio Rio Negro: (0,30* 0,008) + (0,30*0,0028) + (0,40*0,0025)

= 0,42% of Amazonas allocation 6.373.439 tCO2

Step 3. Projected deforestation (40%):

I.L. Médio Rio Negro: 12.138 ha of deforestation (2010-2020)

Amazonas State: 4.850.800 of deforestation (2010-2020)

I.L. Médio Rio Negro represents 0,25% of Amazonas´s projected deforestation

I.L. Médio Rio Negro

Page 17: Amazonas jnr workshop

SDR RIO MADEIRA Step 1: Carbon Stocks (30%)

SDR Rio Madeira: 226.273 hectares of forests

Amazonas State: 123.560.872 hectares of forests

SDR Madeira has 0,18% of Amazonas´s forest carbon stocks

Step 2: Historical deforestation (30%)

SDR Rio Madeira: 251,62 ha/year

Amazonas State: 81.030 ha/year

SDR Madeira represents 0,31% of Amazonas´s historical deforestation rates

Page 18: Amazonas jnr workshop

Step 4: Consolidation

Allocation to SDR Madeira: (0,30*0,0018) + (0,30*0,0031) + (0,40* 0,0034) = 0,28%

Amazonas allocation 4.199.955 tCO2

Step 3: Projected deforestation (40%)

SDR Madeira: 16.548 hectares (2010-2020)

Amazonas State: 4.850.800 hectares (2010-2020)

SDR Madeira represents 0,34% of Amazonas´s projected deforestation

RDS RIO MADEIRA

Page 19: Amazonas jnr workshop

Step 1: Carbon stocks (30%)

PA Juma: 608.680 hectares of forests

Amazonas State: 123.560.872 hectares of forests

Apuí has 0,49% of Amazonas´s forest carbon stocks

Rural Settlement of Apuí – PA Juma

Step 3: Projected deforestation (40%)

Apuí: 145.923 hectares (2010-2020)

Amazonas State: 4.850.800 hectares (2010-2020)

Apuí represents 3,01% of Amazonas´s projected deforestation

Step 2: Historical deforestation (30%)

Apuí: 6.884 ha/year

Amazonas State: 81.030 ha/year

Apuí represents 8,5% of Amazonas´s historical deforestation rate

Page 20: Amazonas jnr workshop

Step 4: Consolidation

(0,30*0,0049)+(0,30*0,085)+(0,40*0,03) = 3,9% of Amazonas allocation

60.147.532,92 t CO2

Rural settlement of Apuí – PA Juma

Page 21: Amazonas jnr workshop

U-REDD Allocation (2010-2020)

I.L. Médio Rio Negro: 6.373.939 t CO2

SDR Rio Madeira: 4.199.955 t CO2

Rural Settlement of Apuí: 60.147.532 t CO2

Page 22: Amazonas jnr workshop

Questions and lessons learned

Preliminary baselines + targets are an important step for early moving, but should be flexible for future changes

Subnational is important to channel funds for readiness and jurisdictional programatic activities Should be efficient, transparent and multi-stakeholder

Amazon, SISA Company, FAS

Target: reducing deforestation and improving livelihoods What is the best implementation arrangement?

Importance of learning lessons with pilots

Page 23: Amazonas jnr workshop

Obrigado!!!