Top Banner
Amateurism and College Sports
24

Amateurism and College Sports

Feb 08, 2016

Download

Documents

Ajay Surana

Amateurism and College Sports. In 2005-2006 NCAA game revenue was $500 million – not including football bowl games. 90% of this came from March Madness. Thus 1% of student athletes generated almost all the revenue of the NCAA. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Amateurism and College Sports

1

Amateurism and College Sports

Page 2: Amateurism and College Sports

2

In 2005-2006 NCAA game revenue was $500 million – not including football bowl games. 90% of this came from March Madness.Thus 1% of student athletes generated almost all the revenue of the NCAA.

Colleges and Universities use sports to enhance the prestige of the institutions and to contribute to the bottom line, much like cities do ( as we saw before).

Much of the first section of the chapter deals with the history of amateurism in America, and I know you will enjoy that reading.

Page 3: Amateurism and College Sports

3

CharacterMany say that sports is a way for participants to develop character. Historically this meant enforced religious devotions, but today is more about building courage and initiative, tolerance and persistence.

Page 4: Amateurism and College Sports

4

How to view the NCAAWhile not mutually exclusive, it can be said the NCAA is 1) A defender of the academic mission of the university (where student athletes are treated like the rest of the student body)2) Is a subverted market for athletes. In other words, the NCAA is the enforcer in a cartel.

Remember – college athletes generate revenue. Competition for players may push up “pay” for players. As long as the MRP > or equal to pay the college makes money by getting the athlete.

Page 5: Amateurism and College Sports

5

Prisoner’s DilemmaTable 11.1 (and next slide) suggests the dilemma colleges face when recruiting. Each school sees that spending heavily is the dominant strategy. So both end up spending a lot and having no real advantage over the other. If neither spent a lot on recruiting again neither would have a real advantage but they wouldn’t spend as much money. This idea is presented with the concept of no NCAA around.

So, the NCAA comes in and says you can’t spend heavily on recruiting (really meaning there are many restrictions on what can be done with student athletes).

Page 6: Amateurism and College Sports

6

Darwin UHuxley U spend heavily Spend littleSpend heavily no advantage Huxley strong to either Darwin weakSpend little Huxley weak no advantage Darwin strong to eitherShort of colluding, Huxley sees that no matter what Darwin does, it is better to spend heavily than to spend little (if Darwin spend heavily Huxley is in a weaker position by spending little, and if Darwin spends little Huxley gains by spending heavily). Darwin sees things the same way and thus they both spend heavily.

Page 7: Amateurism and College Sports

7

Rent earned by schools due to NCAA

Rent = MRP of an athlete minus what school pays in terms of tuition and fees.

Some dude named Brown did some work where he showed schools may have revenues of up to $1 million generated by an athlete, but the school only has to pay the athlete about $30,000 in tuition and room and board and the like.

Who gets the excess money? Athletic directors? Coaches? Students in the form of lower tuition?

Page 8: Amateurism and College Sports

8

CartelThe NCAA is a cartel. A cartel is a group of firms (or countries in the case of OPEC) that cooperate in order to exercise monopoly or monopsony power over a market. What do they cooperate over? They- Fix market price structure instead of letting

competition work-they assign output levels to members-divide cartel profits-erect barriers to entry by others.

The authors of the book suggest a cartel of two is like a monopoly that makes its output in two plants. We focus on this multiplant monopoly next.

Page 9: Amateurism and College Sports

9

Multiplant monopolyEach facility or plant has a marginal cost structure where the MC rises as output rises in a plant.

The next unit of output of the firm will come from the plant with the lower MC for that unit.

Example: say the two plants are identical where MC in each plant is always going up with successive units of output.The first unit of output for the firm will come from “plant1.”The 2nd unit of output for the firm will come from “plant2.”The 3rd unit of output for the firm will come from “plant1.” There is back and forth from plant to plant for units of output.

Page 10: Amateurism and College Sports

10

Multiplant MonopolyExample – say the plants do not have identical MC schedules.

The first several units of the firm come from the plant that has lower MC. Then the rest of the units come from each plant with the back and forth nature mentioned when the plants are identical.

Page 11: Amateurism and College Sports

11

Multiplant Monopoly

Here we study the situation where a monopoly sells in one market but makes the

output in two facilities.

Page 12: Amateurism and College Sports

12

multiplant monopolistThe type of monopolist we will consider here is one that produces output in two facilities, but sells the output in one market.The questions we want to answer are:1) How much output to sell in the market,2) What price to charge in the market,3) How much of the total output should come from each of the facilities?

Page 13: Amateurism and College Sports

13

firm level marginal costEach facility will have a marginal cost schedule. The first unit of output out of each facility will have a MC value, of course. Say the first plant has a MC = 3 for the first unit and plant 2 has a MC = 4 for the first unit. The first unit the firm sells should come form plant 1.Now say the second unit from plant 1 has a MC = 3.5. The second unit the firm sells should come from plant 1 as well. If the third unit from plant 1 has a MC = 4.25, then the third unit the firm should sell should be the first unit from plant 2. In a graph this is accomplished by horizontally adding the plant level MC’s to get the firm level MC.

Page 14: Amateurism and College Sports

14

Firm level marginal cost

MC1 MC2

$ MC firm

equal

The marginal cost of the firm is the horizontal sum of the marginal cost in each plant. I show in math how to make this summation later.

Page 15: Amateurism and College Sports

15

Notice on the previous slide the plant 2 MC is to the right of the plant 1 MC.

I have a certain dollar amount shown in the graph. Plant 2 is in a sense is the low cost producer because for MC to reach the level of the dollar amount shown it can add way more units of output than can be achieved in plant 1.

Think about Nebraska football recruiting. The first 20 or 30 guys are easy to get. They want to play at Nebraska. What about Sam Houston State? To get that 30th guy is hard. A great deal of time and money would have to be spent to get the guy because the guy probably thinks he can play at Nebraska. SamHS will have to spend a lot to convince the dude.

Page 16: Amateurism and College Sports

16

decision time

MC1 MC2

$ MC firm

D

MR

Pm

Q1 Q2 Q = Q1 + Q2

1

2

3 3

The 1, 2, and 3’s go with the analysis on the next page.

Page 17: Amateurism and College Sports

17

analysisFrom the previous slide

1) The firm will sell the level of output where firm level MC = MR,2) charge the price on the demand curve at this level of output,3) recognize the MR at the optimal Q is a firm level MR now and each plant should produce the amount where MR = MC.Since the firm level MR drives the revenue side of things, don’t sell additional units that have higher MC than MR. Thus plants have MC’s that are equal and also equal to MR.

Page 18: Amateurism and College Sports

18

In general, when the inverse demand isP = A – BQ, the MR isMR = A – 2BQ. Example: Say demand is P = 70 – 0.5Q, then MR = 70 – Q.

Note in the example that B = 0.5 and 2B = 2(0.5) = 1.

So, this is just a rule you will use in working with a monopoly. You have to put the demand in this inverse form to apply the rule. (If you have demand as Q = a –bP, the rewrite as P = (a/b) – (1/b)Q and thus A = a/b and B = 1/b.)

Page 19: Amateurism and College Sports

19

Decision in Math Terms

Say we have demand in inverse form ofP = 40 – Q.

Plus say the total cost in each plant is (with subscripts)

TC1 = Q1 + Q12,

TC2 = 4Q2 + 0.5Q22.

The MR for the firm is: MR = 40 – 2Q. The MC at each plant is MC1 = 1 + 2Q1,

MC2 = 4 + Q2.

Page 20: Amateurism and College Sports

20

Decision in Math Terms There are several ways we could proceed at this time to answer the questions we set out above. I have chosen the path that is consistent with using the graph we saw before. Next you will see a crucial step. Re-express each MC in Q form asMC1 = 1 + 2Q1, as Q1 = .5 MC1 - .5 MC2 = 4 + Q2, as Q2 = MC2 – 4.Now, the Q’s add up to Q and on the right side we add to get Q = 1.5MC – 4.5 (you ignore the subscripts on the MC terms and add them together.)

Page 21: Amateurism and College Sports

21

Output and Price for the FirmRe-express the MC for the firm asMC = (2/3)Q + 3. We have MR = 40 – 2Q. Thus the level of output to maximize profit occurs where MR = MC and we have 40 – 2Q = (2/3)Q + 3, or Q = 37(3/8) = 13.875. The price to charge is on the demand curveP = 40 – 13.875 = 26.125. Note at the optimal level of output the MR = 40 – 27.75 = 12.25.

Page 22: Amateurism and College Sports

22

Production in each plantThe MC in each plant, again, isMC1 = 1 + 2Q1,MC2 = 4 + Q2.With MR = 12.25 at the optimal output, set each MC = 12.25 to see how much to make in each plant:Plant 1 1 + 2Q1 = 12.25, or Q1 = 5.625 andPlant 2 4 + Q2 = 12.25, or Q2 = 8.25. Note the two Q’s add up to what we saw before.

Page 23: Amateurism and College Sports

23

ProfitThe profit for the firm is 258.1875.Find this by looking at the TR and TC in each plant.So in plant 1 TR = PQ = 26.125(5.625) = 146.953125, and TC = Q1 + Q12 = 5.625 + 5.625(5.625) = 37.265625 and profit = 109.6875In plant 2 TR = 26.125(8.25) = 215.53125, and TC = 4Q2 + .5Q22 = 4(8.25) + .5(8.25)(8.25) = 67.03125 and profit = 148.5.Thus the total profit = 109.6875 + 148.5 = 258.1875

Page 24: Amateurism and College Sports

24

How does all this relate?When you consider the schools that win the most generate the most fan interest and thus revenue, these schools are really the low MC producers and thus they get the bigger share of the market output (see table 11.2).