Top Banner
A.Magnon COMPASS week, PRAGUE August 1 st -5 2005 1 COMPASS muon programme Alain Magnon DAPNIA/SPhN (CEA Saclay) On behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration
51

A.MagnonCOMPASS week, PRAGUE August 1 st -5 20051 COMPASS muon programme Alain Magnon DAPNIA/SPhN (CEA Saclay) On behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration.

Jan 18, 2016

Download

Documents

Brendan Hall
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • COMPASS muon programme

    Alain Magnon DAPNIA/SPhN (CEA Saclay) On behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration

  • Highlights about results, upgrades, prospects, - SPSC Villars meeting 22-28 Sept 2004 - SPSC71 meeting 3 May 2005 (G. Mallot) - SPSC72 meeting 5 July 2005 - Talks by Paolo P., Sonia H. & Alex K. (section 4) Vadim A. (section 5)

    2006 & beyond ? Content

  • Report on the SPSC Villars Meeting

    September 22-28 2004

    John DaintonUniversity of Liverpool, GB

    (on behalf of the SPSC)Villars 2004

  • Report on the SPSC Villars Meeting

    September 22-28 2004

    John DaintonUniversity of Liverpool, GB

    (on behalf of the SPSC)FrameworkMachines and BeamsHeavy IonsNeutrinosSoft and Hard Protons Antiproton PhysicsFlavour PhysicsOther TopicsSummaryVillars 2004 COMPASSReport on the SPSC Villars meeting by John Dainton, University of Liverpool (CERN-SPSC-2005-010 SPSC-M-730 February 28th 2005, available on Web)

  • Bielefeld, Bochum, Bonn (ISKP, PI), Burdwan and Calcutta,CERN, Dubna (LPP, LNP), Erlangen, Freiburg, Lisbon, Mainz, Moscow (INR, LPI, MSU), Munich-LMU, Munich-TU, Nagoya, Prague (CU, CUT, TUL), Protvino,Saclay, Tel Aviv, Torino (Univ., INFN), Trieste (Univ.,INFN), Warsaw (SINS), Warsaw (TU)

    More than 220 physicists from 28 Institutes COMPASS Collaboration

  • Physics programmeMuon beam programme

    Quarks and gluon polarisation in polarised (longitudinal) nucleonsTransverse spin distributionLambda polarisationDiffractive vector-meson productionHadron structure and spectroscopyHadron beam programme

    Polarisibility of pions and kaons (Primakoff reaction)Exotics q-states, glue ballsSemi-leptonic decays of charmed baryonsDouble charmed hadrons GPDs (DVCS, HEMP) - under consideration -Nicole dHose talkStephan Paul talk

  • SM1 dipoleSM2 dipolePolarised TargetHCAL1Muon-filter1,MW1SPS 160 GeV 2.108m/spillMicromegas,DC,SciFiGems,SciFi,DCs,strawsMWPC Gems Scifitrigger-hodoscopesSilicon Spectrometer 2002 -> 2004RICH_1Gem_11ECAL2,HCAL2straws,MWPC,Gems,SciFistrawsMuon-filter2,MW2 DW45SciFiVeto

  • COMPASS objectives Original programme set for about 5 years (1) of running at 150 days/year with 14.4s supercyle and eSPS = 80%. i.e. 7.2 105 spills/year i.e. 1019 PoT/year (2 108 m/spill) (1) HMC (4 years) - CHEOPS (2 years)

  • 2002 2003 2004 Beam (1) 106days 90d 110dSPS+BL (2) .89 .63 .67Preparation ~30d 7d 3dSpectro(3) .77 .83 .87Data taking (4) 44d 39d 61dmuon (L/T) 33d/11d 30d/9d 47d/14d Data taking 2002 2004(1) Scheduled beam excluding MDs (4) L/T Longitudinal/Transverse sharing ~ 80/20(2) Inefficiency from SPS, beam line, etc(3) ~ 0.90 additional due to time needed to rotate spin and calibrate spectrometer 2004 19d

    4d

    15dhadron

  • Data taking 2002 - 2004muon: 2002 + 2003 + 2004 -> 11.6 105 spillsrequest: 7.2 105 spills/year 2.5 (proposal-year)Pilot hadron run: 2004 -> ~ 0.7 105 spillsWe got ~ 1.6 (proposal-year)

  • Highlights (SPSC71 status report) : - g1 - transversity - L polarisation -DG/G from high pT hadron pairs -DG/G from open-charm - more

    Physics results

  • most precise measurement for 0.004 < x < 0.03 PLB 612 (2005) 154 new NLO QCD fit, precision of a0 improves factor 2 ( = 4 GeV2) g1 of the deuteron 2002-2003 data

  • single transverse-spin asymmetries (2002 data) - Collins: related to transverse quark distributions - Sivers : related to intrinsic kTPRL 94,202002 (2005) Towards transversity CollinsSiversh+h-

  • all asymmetries compatible with zeromeasure product of chiral-odd FF and transverse-PDF- is the analysing power of Collins FF small? or are the transverse parton distributions small? (proton-neutron cancellation in deuteron ?)try other polarimeters- interference FF of two hadrons- lambda polarisationQuark polarimeters

  • Theoretical work on Sivers SSAExtracting the Sivers function from polarized SIDIS data and making predictions

    - Phenomelogical model whose parameters are constrained by HERMES proton measurements.

    - COMPASS 2002 preliminary results for Sivers effect are in agreement with the model.

    M. Anselmino et al. hep-ph/057181(including HERMES Prel. Results shown at DIS05)

  • Theoretical work on Sivers SSAM. Anselmino et al. hep-ph/057181Predictions of Sivers asymmetries on a proton target

  • Expected accuracy for Collins asymmetries

    20022002-42006

  • Strategies to suppress background: 1) Open charm production: q = c unique, no background charm fragmentation, 1.2 D0 per event D0 -> K- + (BR 4%), D*+(~20%) -> D0 +

    2) High-pT hadron pair production: q=u,d,s background from non PGF events & resolved g

    pQCD scale set by: 1) > 4mc2 or 2) > (pt1+pt2)2G/G from Photon-Gluon Fusion Photon Gluon FusionLOW STAT.HIGH STAT.Needed since Q2 ~ 0

  • aLL : calculable partonic asymmetriesR : Monte-Carlo (Lepto/Phytia depending on Q2)Photon Gluon FusionLeading order ProcessQCD-Comptone, mNmeasuredh1h2G/G from high-pT hadron pair

  • Q2 < 1GeV2250000 evtsQ2 > 1GeV2 28000 evts

    2002 and 2003 data- pT,1, pT,2 > 0.7 GeV, p2T,1 + p2T,2 > 2.5 GeV2,- for statistical reasons use A|| / D- D depolarisation factor,- exact formula used in analysis

    high-pT hadron pairsQ21GeV2

  • more difficult than large Q2contributions from resolved photons- spin dependent structure of the photonperturbative part calculablenon-perturbative part:- min/max VMD scenarios (Glck, Reya, Sieg)- tuning of intrinsic kT partons in the photonnucleon parameters- tuning of fragmentation functions- tuning of intrinsic kT in nucleon

    high-pT hadron pairs: Q2

  • Q2>1GeV2 :Q2
  • G = 2.48G = 0.62G = 0.16Gluon polarisationG/G (xg 0.1) is smallGRSV2000NLO fits to g1m2 = 3 Gev2 DG>1 disfavoured

  • Open charm: Ds from D*srequiring the slow pion in D* D s K sD0 K 0

  • Gluon polarisation, D0 & D* events2002-2003 dataDG/G = -1.08 +/- 0.73 = 0.15 +/- 0.08

  • G = 2.48G = 0.62G = 0.16Gluon polarisationGRSV2000NLO fits to g1

  • 2002 2004 -> 2006 FoM(DG/G)

    s(DG/G)=1/FoM1/2

    We work very hard to increase FoM FoM Figure of Merit for open charm

  • FoM increase in 2006 (with upgrades):

    New COMPASS magnet: 1.3Rich upgrade: 1.5Ecal: 1.2K below threshold: 1.1100 days of beam: 1.3 -> (~ .9) total: 3.4 -> (~2.4) Figure of Merit for open charm

  • Large Angle Spectrometer 2002-3-4-6DCs: 3Straws: 1 1/2 21/2 end 2002 downstream of SM2.....DC1 DC2 DC4 StrawsCOMPASS PT solenoidSMC solenoidInitial lay-outModified~ 200 mrd~ 70 mrd

  • COMPASS Oxford Danfysik magnet OD magnet presently tested and instrumented in Saclay

    Some delays ...

    Magnet will be delivered to CERN in November

  • COMPASS OD magnet1st attempt to get uniform field (24.06): encouraging100 ppmRequest is 100 ppm

    homognisation 89,93%, 90,1724%

    -10957.3356499737-11025.0978162057

    -4259.6292040819-4076.8432898284

    -1405.1972280382-1309.5557522337

    -232.1978325534-272.3235203422

    88.075039934144.0523341729

    108.092094464560.0713647812

    52.044341779212.0142729562

    0-24.0285459127

    -28.0238763426-52.0618494773

    -48.0409308731-52.0618494773

    -40.034109061-36.0428188689

    -8.0068218122-12.0142729564

    20.0170545304-4.0047576521

    24.02046543654.0047576519

    -4.0034109061-8.0095153042

    -8.0068218122-16.0190306085

    0-12.0142729564

    00

    32.027287248828.0333035646

    48.040930873148.057091825

    60.051163591460.0713647812

    40.034109060836.0428188687

    012.0142729562

    -32.0272872488-12.0142729564

    -64.0545744975-44.0523341731

    -64.0545744975-60.0713647814

    -44.0375199669-48.0570918252

    -8.00682181220

    60.051163591452.0618494772

    120.1023271827108.1284566064

    100.085272652292.109425998

    -224.1910107412-216.2569132129

    -1281.0914899495-1285.5272063212

    -4147.5336987113-4016.771925047

    -10757.1651046692-10824.8599336013

    +90% (1) 24_06

    +90% (2) 24_06

    Position cm

    dB/Bo ppm

    Homognisation

    -90% after night 08_06

    2.501Calibre 30mT2.501

    Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field

    -85-30.682.470322.5012300982.500729902-12259.1943957967

    -80-13.042.487962.5012300982.500729902-5205.9592639685

    -75-4.682.496322.5012300982.500729902-1863.2695983174

    -70-1.132.499872.5012300982.500729902-443.8260202

    -650.012.501012.5012300982.50072990211.9952978433

    -600.222.501222.5012300982.50072990295.9623827461

    -550.152.501152.5012300982.50072990267.9733544451

    -500.062.501062.5012300982.50072990231.9874609154

    -450.022.501022.5012300982.50072990215.9937304578

    -400.022.501022.5012300982.50072990215.9937304578

    -350.062.501062.5012300982.50072990231.9874609154

    -300.12.50112.5012300982.50072990247.9811913731

    -250.122.501122.5012300982.50072990255.9780566018

    -200.112.501112.5012300982.50072990251.9796239874

    -150.082.501082.5012300982.50072990239.9843261442

    -1002.5012.5012300982.5007299027.9968652289

    -5-0.012.500992.5012300982.5007299023.9984326144

    0-0.022.500982.5012300982.5007299020

    5-0.032.500972.5012300982.500729902-3.9984326144

    10-0.152.500852.5012300982.500729902-51.9796239874

    15-0.172.500832.5012300982.500729902-59.9764892161

    20-0.22.50082.5012300982.500729902-71.9717870594

    25-0.162.500842.5012300982.500729902-55.9780566018

    30-0.062.500942.5012300982.500729902-15.9937304576

    35-0.012.500992.5012300982.5007299023.9984326144

    400.052.501052.5012300982.50072990227.9890283009

    450.082.501082.5012300982.50072990239.9843261442

    500.162.501162.5012300982.50072990271.9717870596

    550.192.501192.5012300982.50072990283.9670849027

    600.242.501242.5012300982.500729902103.9592479748

    650.062.501062.5012300982.50072990231.9874609154

    70-0.842.500162.5012300982.500729902-327.8714743821

    75-3.662.497342.5012300982.500729902-1455.4294716471

    80-10.722.490282.5012300982.500729902-4278.3228974242

    85-25.82.47522.5012300982.500729902-10307.9592799621

    1er essai homogeneisation avec un encadrement serre sur John.Mesure apres une 12h heures (G2 quasi nul)

    +90,1724% 17_06

    -2.505Calibre 30mT-2.505

    Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field

    -8527.15-2.47785-2.505390514-2.504889486-10893.6027527403

    -8010.82-2.49418-2.505390514-2.504889486-4375.004989741

    -753.53-2.50147-2.505390514-2.504889486-1464.9879847035

    -700.64-2.50436-2.505390514-2.504889486-311.3598441605

    -65-0.13-2.50513-2.505390514-2.504889486-3.9917928739

    -60-0.2-2.5052-2.505390514-2.50488948623.9507572431

    -55-0.1-2.5051-2.505390514-2.504889486-15.9671714953

    -500-2.505-2.505390514-2.504889486-55.8851002339

    -450.01-2.50499-2.505390514-2.504889486-59.8768931078

    -400-2.505-2.505390514-2.504889486-55.8851002339

    -35-0.09-2.50509-2.505390514-2.504889486-19.9589643692

    -30-0.16-2.50516-2.505390514-2.5048894867.9835857478

    -25-0.17-2.50517-2.505390514-2.50488948611.9753786215

    -20-0.2-2.5052-2.505390514-2.50488948623.9507572431

    -15-0.17-2.50517-2.505390514-2.50488948611.9753786215

    -10-0.12-2.50512-2.505390514-2.504889486-7.9835857478

    -5-0.11-2.50511-2.505390514-2.504889486-11.9753786216

    0-0.14-2.50514-2.505390514-2.5048894860

    5-0.16-2.50516-2.505390514-2.5048894867.9835857478

    10-0.06-2.50506-2.505390514-2.504889486-31.9343429908

    150.02-2.50498-2.505390514-2.504889486-63.8686859817

    200.07-2.50493-2.505390514-2.504889486-83.8276503509

    250.12-2.50488-2.505390514-2.504889486-103.7866147201

    300.03-2.50497-2.505390514-2.504889486-67.8604788556

    35-0.05-2.50505-2.505390514-2.504889486-35.9261358647

    40-0.01-2.50501-2.505390514-2.504889486-51.8933073601

    45-0.02-2.50502-2.505390514-2.504889486-47.9015144862

    500-2.505-2.505390514-2.504889486-55.8851002339

    55-0.08-2.50508-2.505390514-2.504889486-23.9507572431

    60-0.19-2.50519-2.505390514-2.50488948619.9589643692

    65-0.04-2.50504-2.505390514-2.504889486-39.9179287386

    700.8-2.5042-2.505390514-2.504889486-375.228530142

    753.65-2.50135-2.505390514-2.504889486-1512.8894991896

    8010.82-2.49418-2.505390514-2.504889486-4375.004989741

    8526.17-2.47883-2.505390514-2.504889486-10502.407051103

    Mthode de monte du solnoide exprimentaleHomognisation aprs chauffage des trims a 90.00%,mise en route trim + montee a 90.1724%

    +89,93% 17_06

    -2.5Calibre 30mT-2.5

    Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field

    -8527-2.473-2.500320007-2.499819993-10827.696824489

    -8010.87-2.48913-2.500320007-2.499819993-4375.8774754308

    -753.52-2.49648-2.500320007-2.499819993-1435.9597931258

    -700.67-2.49933-2.500320007-2.499819993-295.991712232

    -65-0.1-2.5001-2.500320007-2.49981999311.9996640095

    -60-0.15-2.50015-2.500320007-2.49981999331.9991040251

    -55-0.05-2.50005-2.500320007-2.499819993-7.9997760063

    -500.02-2.49998-2.500320007-2.499819993-35.9989920283

    -450.05-2.49995-2.500320007-2.499819993-47.9986560376

    -400.02-2.49998-2.500320007-2.499819993-35.9989920283

    -35-0.03-2.50003-2.500320007-2.499819993-15.9995520125

    -30-0.12-2.50012-2.500320007-2.49981999319.9994400156

    -25-0.15-2.50015-2.500320007-2.49981999331.9991040251

    -20-0.14-2.50014-2.500320007-2.49981999327.999216022

    -15-0.12-2.50012-2.500320007-2.49981999319.9994400156

    -10-0.06-2.50006-2.500320007-2.499819993-3.9998880032

    -5-0.06-2.50006-2.500320007-2.499819993-3.9998880032

    0-0.07-2.50007-2.500320007-2.4998199930

    5-0.09-2.50009-2.500320007-2.4998199937.9997760063

    100.02-2.49998-2.500320007-2.499819993-35.9989920283

    150.11-2.49989-2.500320007-2.499819993-71.9979840564

    200.15-2.49985-2.500320007-2.499819993-87.997536069

    250.23-2.49977-2.500320007-2.499819993-119.9966400942

    300.14-2.49986-2.500320007-2.499819993-83.9976480659

    350.06-2.49994-2.500320007-2.499819993-51.9985440408

    400.12-2.49988-2.500320007-2.499819993-75.9978720595

    450.13-2.49987-2.500320007-2.499819993-79.9977600627

    500.1-2.4999-2.500320007-2.499819993-67.9980960534

    550.05-2.49995-2.500320007-2.499819993-47.9986560376

    60-0.02-2.50002-2.500320007-2.499819993-19.9994400156

    650.12-2.49988-2.500320007-2.499819993-75.9978720595

    700.98-2.49902-2.500320007-2.499819993-419.9882403294

    753.83-2.49617-2.500320007-2.499819993-1559.9563212229

    8011.06-2.48894-2.500320007-2.499819993-4451.8753474903

    8527-2.473-2.500320007-2.499819993-10827.696824489

    Mthode de monte du solnoide 0-> 90.0893%Trim on (mme rglage que 90,1724%)back to 90.00%: pas excellentOn descend 89,93% (Trim G2 pas totalement annul)

    +90.1747% 24_06

    -2.498Calibre 30mT-2.498

    Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field

    -8527.5-2.4705-2.498119787-2.497620213-10957.3356499737

    -8010.77-2.48723-2.498119787-2.497620213-4259.6292040819

    -753.64-2.49436-2.498119787-2.497620213-1405.1972280382

    -700.71-2.49729-2.498119787-2.497620213-232.1978325534

    -65-0.09-2.49809-2.498119787-2.49762021388.0750399341

    -60-0.14-2.49814-2.498119787-2.497620213108.0920944645

    -550-2.498-2.498119787-2.49762021352.0443417792

    -500.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130

    -450.2-2.4978-2.498119787-2.497620213-28.0238763426

    -400.25-2.49775-2.498119787-2.497620213-48.0409308731

    -350.23-2.49777-2.498119787-2.497620213-40.034109061

    -300.15-2.49785-2.498119787-2.497620213-8.0068218122

    -250.08-2.49792-2.498119787-2.49762021320.0170545304

    -200.07-2.49793-2.498119787-2.49762021324.0204654365

    -150.14-2.49786-2.498119787-2.497620213-4.0034109061

    -100.15-2.49785-2.498119787-2.497620213-8.0068218122

    -50.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130

    00.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130

    50.05-2.49795-2.498119787-2.49762021332.0272872488

    100.01-2.49799-2.498119787-2.49762021348.0409308731

    15-0.02-2.49802-2.498119787-2.49762021360.0511635914

    200.03-2.49797-2.498119787-2.49762021340.0341090608

    250.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130

    300.21-2.49779-2.498119787-2.497620213-32.0272872488

    350.29-2.49771-2.498119787-2.497620213-64.0545744975

    400.29-2.49771-2.498119787-2.497620213-64.0545744975

    450.24-2.49776-2.498119787-2.497620213-44.0375199669

    500.15-2.49785-2.498119787-2.497620213-8.0068218122

    55-0.02-2.49802-2.498119787-2.49762021360.0511635914

    60-0.17-2.49817-2.498119787-2.497620213120.1023271827

    65-0.12-2.49812-2.498119787-2.497620213100.0852726522

    700.69-2.49731-2.498119787-2.497620213-224.1910107412

    753.33-2.49467-2.498119787-2.497620213-1281.0914899495

    8010.49-2.48751-2.498119787-2.497620213-4147.5336987113

    8527-2.471-2.498119787-2.497620213-10757.1651046692

    +90.1747% 24_06 (2)

    -2.497Calibre 30mT-2.497

    Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field

    -8527.5-2.4695-2.497279703-2.496780297-11025.0978162057

    -8010.15-2.48685-2.497279703-2.496780297-4076.8432898284

    -753.24-2.49376-2.497279703-2.496780297-1309.5557522337

    -700.65-2.49635-2.497279703-2.496780297-272.3235203422

    -65-0.14-2.49714-2.497279703-2.49678029744.0523341729

    -60-0.18-2.49718-2.497279703-2.49678029760.0713647812

    -55-0.06-2.49706-2.497279703-2.49678029712.0142729562

    -500.03-2.49697-2.497279703-2.496780297-24.0285459127

    -450.1-2.4969-2.497279703-2.496780297-52.0618494773

    -400.1-2.4969-2.497279703-2.496780297-52.0618494773

    -350.06-2.49694-2.497279703-2.496780297-36.0428188689

    -300-2.497-2.497279703-2.496780297-12.0142729564

    -25-0.02-2.49702-2.497279703-2.496780297-4.0047576521

    -20-0.04-2.49704-2.497279703-2.4967802974.0047576519

    -15-0.01-2.49701-2.497279703-2.496780297-8.0095153042

    -100.01-2.49699-2.497279703-2.496780297-16.0190306085

    -50-2.497-2.497279703-2.496780297-12.0142729564

    0-0.03-2.49703-2.497279703-2.4967802970

    5-0.1-2.4971-2.497279703-2.49678029728.0333035646

    10-0.15-2.49715-2.497279703-2.49678029748.057091825

    15-0.18-2.49718-2.497279703-2.49678029760.0713647812

    20-0.12-2.49712-2.497279703-2.49678029736.0428188687

    25-0.06-2.49706-2.497279703-2.49678029712.0142729562

    300-2.497-2.497279703-2.496780297-12.0142729564

    350.08-2.49692-2.497279703-2.496780297-44.0523341731

    400.12-2.49688-2.497279703-2.496780297-60.0713647814

    450.09-2.49691-2.497279703-2.496780297-48.0570918252

    50-0.03-2.49703-2.497279703-2.4967802970

    55-0.16-2.49716-2.497279703-2.49678029752.0618494772

    60-0.3-2.4973-2.497279703-2.496780297108.1284566064

    65-0.26-2.49726-2.497279703-2.49678029792.109425998

    700.51-2.49649-2.497279703-2.496780297-216.2569132129

    753.18-2.49382-2.497279703-2.496780297-1285.5272063212

    8010-2.487-2.497279703-2.496780297-4016.771925047

    8527-2.47-2.497279703-2.496780297-10824.8599336013

  • RICH (PDs) upgrade in 2006

  • RICH upgrade in 2006central region maPMT:multi-anode PMTslens systemMAD4 preampF1 TDCs, excellent time resolutionouter region APV:keep CsI photodetectornew readout based on APV chips good timing resolutionno DAQ dead time beam

  • RICH maPMTelements tested in T11 beamapproved by INFN in April, design of optics finished, PMs ordered (600)

    delivery schedule Q3 2005 till Jan 2006

    ready spring 2006Trieste, Turin + Bonn, Erlangen, Freiburg, Lisbon, Mainz, Prague (2)

  • APV RICH projectR/O successfully tested during 2004 on the Richinstallation and test Q1 /06

    Trigger time x25nsdR, cmTU-Munich, Saclay Design based on GEM & Si FEE Provides signal timing accuracy

  • Large drift chamber DC4Chamber under construction by Saclayframes deliveredassembly and test Q4/05-Q1/06operational April 2006

  • Nouvel aimant de grande acceptance augmentation de langle solide

    Run 2006 : cible COMPASS

    180 mrad

    70 mrad

    DCs

    Straws

    Solnoide COMPASS

    Solnoide SMC

    2004

    2006

    DC4

  • ECAL1Plan to equip entire ECAL1 for 2006 (Protvino)Also beneficial for open- charmD0 K 0 D*0 D0 0s

  • SPS in 2006Schedule prepared by SPS Coordinator & proposed by SPSC

    COMPASS - 2006 = 3440 h> 142 daysCOMPASS (2004)= 3120 h> 130 days 110(m) 20(h)

  • SPS in 2006Schedule was not accepted by CERN RB New (draft) schedule: COMPASS 2006 2728 h> 113 days (not 142 d) restart of SPS etc SPS+BL ~ 0.7 or lower

    ~ 0.5 proposal year

  • Conclusion muon programme was for ~2.5 years (SPS proposal-years) with 1.6 year of running, important physics results were obtained, also : - 3 physics papers (g1d, Collins/Sivers asym., penta-q search) - DG/G with remarkable precision from high pT low Q2 - s(DG/G) from D0 (0.73 -> 0.43 with 2004)

  • Conclusion Ambitious objective for 2006 Complete proposed muon programme - get error on DG/G from charm close to error of proposal, - run both with deuteron & proton target 1/ successful equipment upgrades 2/ sufficient beam allocation from SPS (?)

  • Additional slides

  • s(h1d,h1p) vs acceptanceSMC magnetCOMPASS magnet

  • Resolved photon contributionse.g.: qq qqPYTHIA

  • Example: kT tuningsystematic error- determined using 15 independent MC simulations- exploring the parameter space in kT of nucleon and photonfragmentation functionsparton shower on/off, renormalisation scalenucleonphoton

  • Data versus MCexcellent to good agreement for all kinematics variables

    lets get

  • Data versus MCexcellent to good agreementfor all kinematics variables

    lets get

  • xBj < 0.05, can neglect QCD Compton and LOLEPTO tuning la SMC high-pT

    xpTphigh-pT hadron pairs: Q2>1GeV2

  • Open charm: MC studiesAROMA Monte Carlo, PGF onlybackground subtracted 2003 data (side bands)Ds indeed from PGF ? Data understood? good agreement data / MChard z-distributionzpTy

  • Open charm: MC studiesaLL from one hadron from PGF reconstructed

    Correlation of generated and reconstructed aLL

    Analysis uses event weighting with aLL deduced from hadron kinematic variables

  • RICH upgrade in 2006

    Are now COMPASS data included in the fit?