A.Magnon COMPASS week, PRAGUE August 1 st -5 2005 1 COMPASS muon programme Alain Magnon DAPNIA/SPhN (CEA Saclay) On behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration
Jan 18, 2016
COMPASS muon programme
Alain Magnon DAPNIA/SPhN (CEA Saclay) On behalf of the COMPASS Collaboration
Highlights about results, upgrades, prospects, - SPSC Villars meeting 22-28 Sept 2004 - SPSC71 meeting 3 May 2005 (G. Mallot) - SPSC72 meeting 5 July 2005 - Talks by Paolo P., Sonia H. & Alex K. (section 4) Vadim A. (section 5)
2006 & beyond ? Content
Report on the SPSC Villars Meeting
September 22-28 2004
John DaintonUniversity of Liverpool, GB
(on behalf of the SPSC)Villars 2004
Report on the SPSC Villars Meeting
September 22-28 2004
John DaintonUniversity of Liverpool, GB
(on behalf of the SPSC)FrameworkMachines and BeamsHeavy IonsNeutrinosSoft and Hard Protons Antiproton PhysicsFlavour PhysicsOther TopicsSummaryVillars 2004 COMPASSReport on the SPSC Villars meeting by John Dainton, University of Liverpool (CERN-SPSC-2005-010 SPSC-M-730 February 28th 2005, available on Web)
Bielefeld, Bochum, Bonn (ISKP, PI), Burdwan and Calcutta,CERN, Dubna (LPP, LNP), Erlangen, Freiburg, Lisbon, Mainz, Moscow (INR, LPI, MSU), Munich-LMU, Munich-TU, Nagoya, Prague (CU, CUT, TUL), Protvino,Saclay, Tel Aviv, Torino (Univ., INFN), Trieste (Univ.,INFN), Warsaw (SINS), Warsaw (TU)
More than 220 physicists from 28 Institutes COMPASS Collaboration
Physics programmeMuon beam programme
Quarks and gluon polarisation in polarised (longitudinal) nucleonsTransverse spin distributionLambda polarisationDiffractive vector-meson productionHadron structure and spectroscopyHadron beam programme
Polarisibility of pions and kaons (Primakoff reaction)Exotics q-states, glue ballsSemi-leptonic decays of charmed baryonsDouble charmed hadrons GPDs (DVCS, HEMP) - under consideration -Nicole dHose talkStephan Paul talk
SM1 dipoleSM2 dipolePolarised TargetHCAL1Muon-filter1,MW1SPS 160 GeV 2.108m/spillMicromegas,DC,SciFiGems,SciFi,DCs,strawsMWPC Gems Scifitrigger-hodoscopesSilicon Spectrometer 2002 -> 2004RICH_1Gem_11ECAL2,HCAL2straws,MWPC,Gems,SciFistrawsMuon-filter2,MW2 DW45SciFiVeto
COMPASS objectives Original programme set for about 5 years (1) of running at 150 days/year with 14.4s supercyle and eSPS = 80%. i.e. 7.2 105 spills/year i.e. 1019 PoT/year (2 108 m/spill) (1) HMC (4 years) - CHEOPS (2 years)
2002 2003 2004 Beam (1) 106days 90d 110dSPS+BL (2) .89 .63 .67Preparation ~30d 7d 3dSpectro(3) .77 .83 .87Data taking (4) 44d 39d 61dmuon (L/T) 33d/11d 30d/9d 47d/14d Data taking 2002 2004(1) Scheduled beam excluding MDs (4) L/T Longitudinal/Transverse sharing ~ 80/20(2) Inefficiency from SPS, beam line, etc(3) ~ 0.90 additional due to time needed to rotate spin and calibrate spectrometer 2004 19d
4d
15dhadron
Data taking 2002 - 2004muon: 2002 + 2003 + 2004 -> 11.6 105 spillsrequest: 7.2 105 spills/year 2.5 (proposal-year)Pilot hadron run: 2004 -> ~ 0.7 105 spillsWe got ~ 1.6 (proposal-year)
Highlights (SPSC71 status report) : - g1 - transversity - L polarisation -DG/G from high pT hadron pairs -DG/G from open-charm - more
Physics results
most precise measurement for 0.004 < x < 0.03 PLB 612 (2005) 154 new NLO QCD fit, precision of a0 improves factor 2 ( = 4 GeV2) g1 of the deuteron 2002-2003 data
single transverse-spin asymmetries (2002 data) - Collins: related to transverse quark distributions - Sivers : related to intrinsic kTPRL 94,202002 (2005) Towards transversity CollinsSiversh+h-
all asymmetries compatible with zeromeasure product of chiral-odd FF and transverse-PDF- is the analysing power of Collins FF small? or are the transverse parton distributions small? (proton-neutron cancellation in deuteron ?)try other polarimeters- interference FF of two hadrons- lambda polarisationQuark polarimeters
Theoretical work on Sivers SSAExtracting the Sivers function from polarized SIDIS data and making predictions
- Phenomelogical model whose parameters are constrained by HERMES proton measurements.
- COMPASS 2002 preliminary results for Sivers effect are in agreement with the model.
M. Anselmino et al. hep-ph/057181(including HERMES Prel. Results shown at DIS05)
Theoretical work on Sivers SSAM. Anselmino et al. hep-ph/057181Predictions of Sivers asymmetries on a proton target
Expected accuracy for Collins asymmetries
20022002-42006
Strategies to suppress background: 1) Open charm production: q = c unique, no background charm fragmentation, 1.2 D0 per event D0 -> K- + (BR 4%), D*+(~20%) -> D0 +
2) High-pT hadron pair production: q=u,d,s background from non PGF events & resolved g
pQCD scale set by: 1) > 4mc2 or 2) > (pt1+pt2)2G/G from Photon-Gluon Fusion Photon Gluon FusionLOW STAT.HIGH STAT.Needed since Q2 ~ 0
aLL : calculable partonic asymmetriesR : Monte-Carlo (Lepto/Phytia depending on Q2)Photon Gluon FusionLeading order ProcessQCD-Comptone, mNmeasuredh1h2G/G from high-pT hadron pair
Q2 < 1GeV2250000 evtsQ2 > 1GeV2 28000 evts
2002 and 2003 data- pT,1, pT,2 > 0.7 GeV, p2T,1 + p2T,2 > 2.5 GeV2,- for statistical reasons use A|| / D- D depolarisation factor,- exact formula used in analysis
high-pT hadron pairsQ21GeV2
more difficult than large Q2contributions from resolved photons- spin dependent structure of the photonperturbative part calculablenon-perturbative part:- min/max VMD scenarios (Glck, Reya, Sieg)- tuning of intrinsic kT partons in the photonnucleon parameters- tuning of fragmentation functions- tuning of intrinsic kT in nucleon
high-pT hadron pairs: Q2
G = 2.48G = 0.62G = 0.16Gluon polarisationG/G (xg 0.1) is smallGRSV2000NLO fits to g1m2 = 3 Gev2 DG>1 disfavoured
Open charm: Ds from D*srequiring the slow pion in D* D s K sD0 K 0
Gluon polarisation, D0 & D* events2002-2003 dataDG/G = -1.08 +/- 0.73 = 0.15 +/- 0.08
G = 2.48G = 0.62G = 0.16Gluon polarisationGRSV2000NLO fits to g1
2002 2004 -> 2006 FoM(DG/G)
s(DG/G)=1/FoM1/2
We work very hard to increase FoM FoM Figure of Merit for open charm
FoM increase in 2006 (with upgrades):
New COMPASS magnet: 1.3Rich upgrade: 1.5Ecal: 1.2K below threshold: 1.1100 days of beam: 1.3 -> (~ .9) total: 3.4 -> (~2.4) Figure of Merit for open charm
Large Angle Spectrometer 2002-3-4-6DCs: 3Straws: 1 1/2 21/2 end 2002 downstream of SM2.....DC1 DC2 DC4 StrawsCOMPASS PT solenoidSMC solenoidInitial lay-outModified~ 200 mrd~ 70 mrd
COMPASS Oxford Danfysik magnet OD magnet presently tested and instrumented in Saclay
Some delays ...
Magnet will be delivered to CERN in November
COMPASS OD magnet1st attempt to get uniform field (24.06): encouraging100 ppmRequest is 100 ppm
homognisation 89,93%, 90,1724%
-10957.3356499737-11025.0978162057
-4259.6292040819-4076.8432898284
-1405.1972280382-1309.5557522337
-232.1978325534-272.3235203422
88.075039934144.0523341729
108.092094464560.0713647812
52.044341779212.0142729562
0-24.0285459127
-28.0238763426-52.0618494773
-48.0409308731-52.0618494773
-40.034109061-36.0428188689
-8.0068218122-12.0142729564
20.0170545304-4.0047576521
24.02046543654.0047576519
-4.0034109061-8.0095153042
-8.0068218122-16.0190306085
0-12.0142729564
00
32.027287248828.0333035646
48.040930873148.057091825
60.051163591460.0713647812
40.034109060836.0428188687
012.0142729562
-32.0272872488-12.0142729564
-64.0545744975-44.0523341731
-64.0545744975-60.0713647814
-44.0375199669-48.0570918252
-8.00682181220
60.051163591452.0618494772
120.1023271827108.1284566064
100.085272652292.109425998
-224.1910107412-216.2569132129
-1281.0914899495-1285.5272063212
-4147.5336987113-4016.771925047
-10757.1651046692-10824.8599336013
+90% (1) 24_06
+90% (2) 24_06
Position cm
dB/Bo ppm
Homognisation
-90% after night 08_06
2.501Calibre 30mT2.501
Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field
-85-30.682.470322.5012300982.500729902-12259.1943957967
-80-13.042.487962.5012300982.500729902-5205.9592639685
-75-4.682.496322.5012300982.500729902-1863.2695983174
-70-1.132.499872.5012300982.500729902-443.8260202
-650.012.501012.5012300982.50072990211.9952978433
-600.222.501222.5012300982.50072990295.9623827461
-550.152.501152.5012300982.50072990267.9733544451
-500.062.501062.5012300982.50072990231.9874609154
-450.022.501022.5012300982.50072990215.9937304578
-400.022.501022.5012300982.50072990215.9937304578
-350.062.501062.5012300982.50072990231.9874609154
-300.12.50112.5012300982.50072990247.9811913731
-250.122.501122.5012300982.50072990255.9780566018
-200.112.501112.5012300982.50072990251.9796239874
-150.082.501082.5012300982.50072990239.9843261442
-1002.5012.5012300982.5007299027.9968652289
-5-0.012.500992.5012300982.5007299023.9984326144
0-0.022.500982.5012300982.5007299020
5-0.032.500972.5012300982.500729902-3.9984326144
10-0.152.500852.5012300982.500729902-51.9796239874
15-0.172.500832.5012300982.500729902-59.9764892161
20-0.22.50082.5012300982.500729902-71.9717870594
25-0.162.500842.5012300982.500729902-55.9780566018
30-0.062.500942.5012300982.500729902-15.9937304576
35-0.012.500992.5012300982.5007299023.9984326144
400.052.501052.5012300982.50072990227.9890283009
450.082.501082.5012300982.50072990239.9843261442
500.162.501162.5012300982.50072990271.9717870596
550.192.501192.5012300982.50072990283.9670849027
600.242.501242.5012300982.500729902103.9592479748
650.062.501062.5012300982.50072990231.9874609154
70-0.842.500162.5012300982.500729902-327.8714743821
75-3.662.497342.5012300982.500729902-1455.4294716471
80-10.722.490282.5012300982.500729902-4278.3228974242
85-25.82.47522.5012300982.500729902-10307.9592799621
1er essai homogeneisation avec un encadrement serre sur John.Mesure apres une 12h heures (G2 quasi nul)
+90,1724% 17_06
-2.505Calibre 30mT-2.505
Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field
-8527.15-2.47785-2.505390514-2.504889486-10893.6027527403
-8010.82-2.49418-2.505390514-2.504889486-4375.004989741
-753.53-2.50147-2.505390514-2.504889486-1464.9879847035
-700.64-2.50436-2.505390514-2.504889486-311.3598441605
-65-0.13-2.50513-2.505390514-2.504889486-3.9917928739
-60-0.2-2.5052-2.505390514-2.50488948623.9507572431
-55-0.1-2.5051-2.505390514-2.504889486-15.9671714953
-500-2.505-2.505390514-2.504889486-55.8851002339
-450.01-2.50499-2.505390514-2.504889486-59.8768931078
-400-2.505-2.505390514-2.504889486-55.8851002339
-35-0.09-2.50509-2.505390514-2.504889486-19.9589643692
-30-0.16-2.50516-2.505390514-2.5048894867.9835857478
-25-0.17-2.50517-2.505390514-2.50488948611.9753786215
-20-0.2-2.5052-2.505390514-2.50488948623.9507572431
-15-0.17-2.50517-2.505390514-2.50488948611.9753786215
-10-0.12-2.50512-2.505390514-2.504889486-7.9835857478
-5-0.11-2.50511-2.505390514-2.504889486-11.9753786216
0-0.14-2.50514-2.505390514-2.5048894860
5-0.16-2.50516-2.505390514-2.5048894867.9835857478
10-0.06-2.50506-2.505390514-2.504889486-31.9343429908
150.02-2.50498-2.505390514-2.504889486-63.8686859817
200.07-2.50493-2.505390514-2.504889486-83.8276503509
250.12-2.50488-2.505390514-2.504889486-103.7866147201
300.03-2.50497-2.505390514-2.504889486-67.8604788556
35-0.05-2.50505-2.505390514-2.504889486-35.9261358647
40-0.01-2.50501-2.505390514-2.504889486-51.8933073601
45-0.02-2.50502-2.505390514-2.504889486-47.9015144862
500-2.505-2.505390514-2.504889486-55.8851002339
55-0.08-2.50508-2.505390514-2.504889486-23.9507572431
60-0.19-2.50519-2.505390514-2.50488948619.9589643692
65-0.04-2.50504-2.505390514-2.504889486-39.9179287386
700.8-2.5042-2.505390514-2.504889486-375.228530142
753.65-2.50135-2.505390514-2.504889486-1512.8894991896
8010.82-2.49418-2.505390514-2.504889486-4375.004989741
8526.17-2.47883-2.505390514-2.504889486-10502.407051103
Mthode de monte du solnoide exprimentaleHomognisation aprs chauffage des trims a 90.00%,mise en route trim + montee a 90.1724%
+89,93% 17_06
-2.5Calibre 30mT-2.5
Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field
-8527-2.473-2.500320007-2.499819993-10827.696824489
-8010.87-2.48913-2.500320007-2.499819993-4375.8774754308
-753.52-2.49648-2.500320007-2.499819993-1435.9597931258
-700.67-2.49933-2.500320007-2.499819993-295.991712232
-65-0.1-2.5001-2.500320007-2.49981999311.9996640095
-60-0.15-2.50015-2.500320007-2.49981999331.9991040251
-55-0.05-2.50005-2.500320007-2.499819993-7.9997760063
-500.02-2.49998-2.500320007-2.499819993-35.9989920283
-450.05-2.49995-2.500320007-2.499819993-47.9986560376
-400.02-2.49998-2.500320007-2.499819993-35.9989920283
-35-0.03-2.50003-2.500320007-2.499819993-15.9995520125
-30-0.12-2.50012-2.500320007-2.49981999319.9994400156
-25-0.15-2.50015-2.500320007-2.49981999331.9991040251
-20-0.14-2.50014-2.500320007-2.49981999327.999216022
-15-0.12-2.50012-2.500320007-2.49981999319.9994400156
-10-0.06-2.50006-2.500320007-2.499819993-3.9998880032
-5-0.06-2.50006-2.500320007-2.499819993-3.9998880032
0-0.07-2.50007-2.500320007-2.4998199930
5-0.09-2.50009-2.500320007-2.4998199937.9997760063
100.02-2.49998-2.500320007-2.499819993-35.9989920283
150.11-2.49989-2.500320007-2.499819993-71.9979840564
200.15-2.49985-2.500320007-2.499819993-87.997536069
250.23-2.49977-2.500320007-2.499819993-119.9966400942
300.14-2.49986-2.500320007-2.499819993-83.9976480659
350.06-2.49994-2.500320007-2.499819993-51.9985440408
400.12-2.49988-2.500320007-2.499819993-75.9978720595
450.13-2.49987-2.500320007-2.499819993-79.9977600627
500.1-2.4999-2.500320007-2.499819993-67.9980960534
550.05-2.49995-2.500320007-2.499819993-47.9986560376
60-0.02-2.50002-2.500320007-2.499819993-19.9994400156
650.12-2.49988-2.500320007-2.499819993-75.9978720595
700.98-2.49902-2.500320007-2.499819993-419.9882403294
753.83-2.49617-2.500320007-2.499819993-1559.9563212229
8011.06-2.48894-2.500320007-2.499819993-4451.8753474903
8527-2.473-2.500320007-2.499819993-10827.696824489
Mthode de monte du solnoide 0-> 90.0893%Trim on (mme rglage que 90,1724%)back to 90.00%: pas excellentOn descend 89,93% (Trim G2 pas totalement annul)
+90.1747% 24_06
-2.498Calibre 30mT-2.498
Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field
-8527.5-2.4705-2.498119787-2.497620213-10957.3356499737
-8010.77-2.48723-2.498119787-2.497620213-4259.6292040819
-753.64-2.49436-2.498119787-2.497620213-1405.1972280382
-700.71-2.49729-2.498119787-2.497620213-232.1978325534
-65-0.09-2.49809-2.498119787-2.49762021388.0750399341
-60-0.14-2.49814-2.498119787-2.497620213108.0920944645
-550-2.498-2.498119787-2.49762021352.0443417792
-500.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130
-450.2-2.4978-2.498119787-2.497620213-28.0238763426
-400.25-2.49775-2.498119787-2.497620213-48.0409308731
-350.23-2.49777-2.498119787-2.497620213-40.034109061
-300.15-2.49785-2.498119787-2.497620213-8.0068218122
-250.08-2.49792-2.498119787-2.49762021320.0170545304
-200.07-2.49793-2.498119787-2.49762021324.0204654365
-150.14-2.49786-2.498119787-2.497620213-4.0034109061
-100.15-2.49785-2.498119787-2.497620213-8.0068218122
-50.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130
00.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130
50.05-2.49795-2.498119787-2.49762021332.0272872488
100.01-2.49799-2.498119787-2.49762021348.0409308731
15-0.02-2.49802-2.498119787-2.49762021360.0511635914
200.03-2.49797-2.498119787-2.49762021340.0341090608
250.13-2.49787-2.498119787-2.4976202130
300.21-2.49779-2.498119787-2.497620213-32.0272872488
350.29-2.49771-2.498119787-2.497620213-64.0545744975
400.29-2.49771-2.498119787-2.497620213-64.0545744975
450.24-2.49776-2.498119787-2.497620213-44.0375199669
500.15-2.49785-2.498119787-2.497620213-8.0068218122
55-0.02-2.49802-2.498119787-2.49762021360.0511635914
60-0.17-2.49817-2.498119787-2.497620213120.1023271827
65-0.12-2.49812-2.498119787-2.497620213100.0852726522
700.69-2.49731-2.498119787-2.497620213-224.1910107412
753.33-2.49467-2.498119787-2.497620213-1281.0914899495
8010.49-2.48751-2.498119787-2.497620213-4147.5336987113
8527-2.471-2.498119787-2.497620213-10757.1651046692
+90.1747% 24_06 (2)
-2.497Calibre 30mT-2.497
Distance au centreDB (mT)B(T)Limite basse specLimite haute specppm of central field
-8527.5-2.4695-2.497279703-2.496780297-11025.0978162057
-8010.15-2.48685-2.497279703-2.496780297-4076.8432898284
-753.24-2.49376-2.497279703-2.496780297-1309.5557522337
-700.65-2.49635-2.497279703-2.496780297-272.3235203422
-65-0.14-2.49714-2.497279703-2.49678029744.0523341729
-60-0.18-2.49718-2.497279703-2.49678029760.0713647812
-55-0.06-2.49706-2.497279703-2.49678029712.0142729562
-500.03-2.49697-2.497279703-2.496780297-24.0285459127
-450.1-2.4969-2.497279703-2.496780297-52.0618494773
-400.1-2.4969-2.497279703-2.496780297-52.0618494773
-350.06-2.49694-2.497279703-2.496780297-36.0428188689
-300-2.497-2.497279703-2.496780297-12.0142729564
-25-0.02-2.49702-2.497279703-2.496780297-4.0047576521
-20-0.04-2.49704-2.497279703-2.4967802974.0047576519
-15-0.01-2.49701-2.497279703-2.496780297-8.0095153042
-100.01-2.49699-2.497279703-2.496780297-16.0190306085
-50-2.497-2.497279703-2.496780297-12.0142729564
0-0.03-2.49703-2.497279703-2.4967802970
5-0.1-2.4971-2.497279703-2.49678029728.0333035646
10-0.15-2.49715-2.497279703-2.49678029748.057091825
15-0.18-2.49718-2.497279703-2.49678029760.0713647812
20-0.12-2.49712-2.497279703-2.49678029736.0428188687
25-0.06-2.49706-2.497279703-2.49678029712.0142729562
300-2.497-2.497279703-2.496780297-12.0142729564
350.08-2.49692-2.497279703-2.496780297-44.0523341731
400.12-2.49688-2.497279703-2.496780297-60.0713647814
450.09-2.49691-2.497279703-2.496780297-48.0570918252
50-0.03-2.49703-2.497279703-2.4967802970
55-0.16-2.49716-2.497279703-2.49678029752.0618494772
60-0.3-2.4973-2.497279703-2.496780297108.1284566064
65-0.26-2.49726-2.497279703-2.49678029792.109425998
700.51-2.49649-2.497279703-2.496780297-216.2569132129
753.18-2.49382-2.497279703-2.496780297-1285.5272063212
8010-2.487-2.497279703-2.496780297-4016.771925047
8527-2.47-2.497279703-2.496780297-10824.8599336013
RICH (PDs) upgrade in 2006
RICH upgrade in 2006central region maPMT:multi-anode PMTslens systemMAD4 preampF1 TDCs, excellent time resolutionouter region APV:keep CsI photodetectornew readout based on APV chips good timing resolutionno DAQ dead time beam
RICH maPMTelements tested in T11 beamapproved by INFN in April, design of optics finished, PMs ordered (600)
delivery schedule Q3 2005 till Jan 2006
ready spring 2006Trieste, Turin + Bonn, Erlangen, Freiburg, Lisbon, Mainz, Prague (2)
APV RICH projectR/O successfully tested during 2004 on the Richinstallation and test Q1 /06
Trigger time x25nsdR, cmTU-Munich, Saclay Design based on GEM & Si FEE Provides signal timing accuracy
Large drift chamber DC4Chamber under construction by Saclayframes deliveredassembly and test Q4/05-Q1/06operational April 2006
Nouvel aimant de grande acceptance augmentation de langle solide
Run 2006 : cible COMPASS
180 mrad
70 mrad
DCs
Straws
Solnoide COMPASS
Solnoide SMC
2004
2006
DC4
ECAL1Plan to equip entire ECAL1 for 2006 (Protvino)Also beneficial for open- charmD0 K 0 D*0 D0 0s
SPS in 2006Schedule prepared by SPS Coordinator & proposed by SPSC
COMPASS - 2006 = 3440 h> 142 daysCOMPASS (2004)= 3120 h> 130 days 110(m) 20(h)
SPS in 2006Schedule was not accepted by CERN RB New (draft) schedule: COMPASS 2006 2728 h> 113 days (not 142 d) restart of SPS etc SPS+BL ~ 0.7 or lower
~ 0.5 proposal year
Conclusion muon programme was for ~2.5 years (SPS proposal-years) with 1.6 year of running, important physics results were obtained, also : - 3 physics papers (g1d, Collins/Sivers asym., penta-q search) - DG/G with remarkable precision from high pT low Q2 - s(DG/G) from D0 (0.73 -> 0.43 with 2004)
Conclusion Ambitious objective for 2006 Complete proposed muon programme - get error on DG/G from charm close to error of proposal, - run both with deuteron & proton target 1/ successful equipment upgrades 2/ sufficient beam allocation from SPS (?)
Additional slides
s(h1d,h1p) vs acceptanceSMC magnetCOMPASS magnet
Resolved photon contributionse.g.: qq qqPYTHIA
Example: kT tuningsystematic error- determined using 15 independent MC simulations- exploring the parameter space in kT of nucleon and photonfragmentation functionsparton shower on/off, renormalisation scalenucleonphoton
Data versus MCexcellent to good agreement for all kinematics variables
lets get
Data versus MCexcellent to good agreementfor all kinematics variables
lets get
xBj < 0.05, can neglect QCD Compton and LOLEPTO tuning la SMC high-pT
xpTphigh-pT hadron pairs: Q2>1GeV2
Open charm: MC studiesAROMA Monte Carlo, PGF onlybackground subtracted 2003 data (side bands)Ds indeed from PGF ? Data understood? good agreement data / MChard z-distributionzpTy
Open charm: MC studiesaLL from one hadron from PGF reconstructed
Correlation of generated and reconstructed aLL
Analysis uses event weighting with aLL deduced from hadron kinematic variables
RICH upgrade in 2006
Are now COMPASS data included in the fit?