-
AM\1217565EN.docx PE660.197v01-00
EN United in diversity EN
European Parliament2019-2024
Committee on Transport and Tourism
2019/2193(INI)
9.11.2020
AMENDMENTS1 - 238Draft reportKarima Delli(PE658.855v01-00)
Technical and operational measures for more efficient and
cleaner maritime transport(2019/2193(INI))
-
PE660.197v01-00 2/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
AM_Com_NonLegReport
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 3/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Amendment 1Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph Oetjen,
José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi Katainen,
Nicola Danti, Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionRecital A
Motion for a resolution Amendment
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea;
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy, transporting more than 80% of the world’s goods1a;
_________________1a EPRS Briefing, Decarbonising maritime
transport: The EU perspective, page 2.
Or. en
Amendment 2Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionRecital A
Motion for a resolution Amendment
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea;
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy;
Or. en
Amendment 3Emmanouil Fragkos, Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionRecital A
Motion for a resolution Amendment
A. whereas maritime transport and A. whereas maritime transport
and
-
PE660.197v01-00 4/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
ports play a key role in the EU economy, with 90% of goods
arriving by sea;
ports play a key role in the EU economy, with 90% of goods
arriving by sea; whereas, during 2018, the European shipping
directly contributed €54 billion to the EU's GDP. Taking into
account the spillover effects onto other sectors such as supply
chain and worker spending impacts, the total contribution stands at
€149 billion; whereas it directly employs 685,000 people, and it
supports up to 2 million jobs when including the impact on other
sectors;
Or. en
Amendment 4Andris Ameriks
Motion for a resolutionRecital A
Motion for a resolution Amendment
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea;
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea; whereas the maritime
sector, and ports in particular, are playing a critical and
strategic role in the supply of goods and in ensuring the
continuity of the economy as clearly demonstrated during the
COVID-19 pandemic;
Or. en
Amendment 5Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar
Motion for a resolutionRecital A
Motion for a resolution Amendment
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy,
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 5/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
with 90% of goods arriving by sea; and in the connectivity and
accessibility of the outermost regions and islands, with 90% of
goods arriving by sea;
Or. pt
Amendment 6Sven Schulze
Motion for a resolutionRecital A
Motion for a resolution Amendment
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea;
A. whereas maritime transport and ports play a key role in the
EU economy, with 90% of goods arriving by sea, and maritime
transport plays an important role for tourism;
Or. de
Amendment 7Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph Oetjen,
José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi Katainen,
Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionRecital A a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Aa. whereas the current COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated that
the maritime sector, ports and its workers is the backbone of the
European economy as the uninterrupted freight transport has been
essential for the functioning of supply chains;
Or. en
Amendment 8Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska,
-
PE660.197v01-00 6/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Maria Spyraki, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi
Motion for a resolutionRecital A a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Aa. whereas the maritime sector, and ports in particular, play a
critical and strategic role in the supply of goods and in ensuring
the continuity of the economy as clearly demonstrated during the
COVID-19 pandemic;
Or. en
Amendment 9Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionRecital A a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Aa. whereas the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the critical
and strategic function of transport, including ports;
Or. nl
Amendment 10Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Motion for a resolutionRecital A a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Aa. whereas the European maritime sector should also contribute
to tackling biodiversity loss and environmental degradation, and
contribute to the objectives of the European Green Deal and 2030
Biodiversity strategy;
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 7/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Or. en
Amendment 11João Ferreira
Motion for a resolutionRecital A a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Aa. whereas the maritime transport of goods and passengers is a
key factor in territorial communication and cohesion, especially in
the case of the outermost regions and/or islands;
Or. pt
Amendment 12Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi
Katainen, Nicola Danti, Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionRecital A b (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ab. whereas the maritime sector is a fundamental part of the EU
internal market and plays an important role in the economic, social
and territorial cohesion of the EU, especially in peripheral,
rural, island and outermost regions, and in this regard the EU
needs to invest in the maritime sector’s competitiveness and its
capacity to make the sustainable transition a reality;
Or. en
Amendment 13Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi
Katainen, Nicola Danti, Pierre Karleskind
-
PE660.197v01-00 8/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolutionRecital B
Motion for a resolution Amendment
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses
heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
B. whereas at European level a system for monitoring, reporting
and verification of CO2 emissions from maritime transport1a is
currently under revision, aiming at reducing shipping GHG emissions
in EU waters;_________________1a MRV Regulation - 2015/757/EU
Or. en
Amendment 14Marco Campomenosi, Roman Haider
Motion for a resolutionRecital B
Motion for a resolution Amendment
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses
heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
B. whereas the maritime sector is a sector which is both
regulated at European level as well as international level and
which is still very reliant on carbon-based fuels;
Or. en
Amendment 15Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki, Elissavet
Vozemberg-Vrionidi
Motion for a resolutionRecital B
Motion for a resolution Amendment
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though
B. whereas the maritime sector is a sector which is both
regulated at European level as well as international level and
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 9/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
it uses heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
which is still very reliant on fossil fuels;
Or. en
Amendment 16Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionRecital B
Motion for a resolution Amendment
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses
heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
B. whereas the maritime sector is a sector which is both
regulated at European level as well as international level and
which is still very reliant on carbon-based fuels;
Or. en
Amendment 17Emmanouil Fragkos, Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionRecital B
Motion for a resolution Amendment
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses
heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, using however
scrubbers and minimising the air pollution emissions from
ships;
Or. en
Amendment 18Emmanouil Fragkos, Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionRecital B
-
PE660.197v01-00 10/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolution Amendment
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses
heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses
heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel; whereas, due to
the nature of this sector, it is more efficient to focus on global
instead of EU legislation;
Or. en
Amendment 19Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionRecital B
Motion for a resolution Amendment
B. whereas the maritime sector is the sector which has the
least-regulated emissions at European level, even though it uses
heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting fuel;
B. whereas every sector must help to achieve the climate targets
and the decarbonisation agenda; whereas the maritime sector is the
sector which has the least-regulated emissions at European level,
even though it uses heavy fuel oil, which is the most polluting
fuel;
Or. nl
Amendment 20Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar
Motion for a resolutionRecital B a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ba. whereas the sector has been making constant efforts to meet
the greenhouse gas reduction targets, by complying with the
existing regulatory framework and implementing those technological
developments made to date;
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 11/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Or. pt
Amendment 21Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionRecital B a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ba. whereas there is a significant international dimension to
maritime transport, which means that the sector’s competitiveness
depends on a level playing field globally;
Or. nl
Amendment 22Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionRecital B b (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Bb. whereas most of the costs of decarbonising the maritime
sector are related to land-based infrastructure; whereas adequate
funding is therefore essential to achieve this necessary
transition; whereas further research and innovation are crucial in
making zero-carbon maritime transport possible;
Or. nl
Amendment 23Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar
Motion for a resolutionRecital C
-
PE660.197v01-00 12/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolution Amendment
C. whereas maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of
CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global
GHG emissions6;
C. whereas maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of
CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global
GHG emissions6, but is the most energy efficient mode of transport
based on the amount of cargo transported and the respective
emissions per tonne of goods transported and per kilometre
travelled;
_________________ _________________6 Third IMO GHG Study. 6
Third IMO GHG Study.
Or. pt
Amendment 24Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Maria Spyraki,
Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionRecital C
Motion for a resolution Amendment
C. whereas maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of
CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global
GHG emissions6 ;
C. whereas maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of
CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global
GHG emissions6 ; The mentioned elements should be updated after the
IMO decision for a global cap of 0,5% sulphur content in maritime
fuels;
_________________ _________________6 Third IMO GHG Study. 6
Third IMO GHG Study.
Or. en
Amendment 25Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi
Katainen, Nicola Danti, Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionRecital C
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 13/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Motion for a resolution Amendment
C. whereas maritime transport emits around 940 million tonnes of
CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately 2.5% of global
GHG emissions6 ;
C. whereas international maritime transport emits around 940
million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for approximately
2.5% of global GHG emissions6 ;
_________________ _________________6 Third IMO GHG Study. 6
Third IMO GHG Study.
Or. en
Amendment 26Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionRecital C a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ca. whereas the Directive 2014/94/EU has identified LNG and
onshore electricity as very useful alternative fuels in maritime
transport, with a potential for long-term oil substitution and
decarbonisation, both during navigation and while dockside, setting
targets for the development of the supply infrastructure of these
fuels;
Or. en
Amendment 27Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki
Motion for a resolutionRecital D
Motion for a resolution Amendment
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from maritime transport could increase by
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from maritime transport could increase from
-
PE660.197v01-00 14/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
between 50% and 250% by 20507 , thereby undermining the
objectives of the Paris Agreement;
about 90% of 2008 emissions in 2018 to 90-130% of 2008 emissions
by 20507, thereby not contributing sufficiently to the achievement
of the objectives of the Paris Agreement;
_________________ _________________7 Third IMO GHG Study. 7
Fourth IMO GHG Study.
Or. en
Amendment 28Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionRecital D
Motion for a resolution Amendment
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from maritime transport could increase by between 50% and
250% by 20507, thereby undermining the objectives of the Paris
Agreement;
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from maritime transport could increase by between 90% and
130% by 20501 a compared to 2008 levels, thereby undermining the
objectives of the Paris Agreement;
_________________ _________________1a Fourth IMO GHG Study.
7 Third IMO GHG Study.
Or. nl
Amendment 29Marco Campomenosi, Roman Haider
Motion for a resolutionRecital D
Motion for a resolution Amendment
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from maritime transport could increase by between 50% and
250% by 20507 , thereby
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from maritime transport could increase by between 50% and
250% by 20507 ;
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 15/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
undermining the objectives of the Paris
Agreement;_________________ _________________7 Third IMO GHG Study.
7 Third IMO GHG Study.
Or. en
Amendment 30Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi
Katainen, Nicola Danti, Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionRecital D
Motion for a resolution Amendment
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from maritime transport could increase by between 50% and
250% by 20507 , thereby undermining the objectives of the Paris
Agreement;
D. whereas if mitigation measures are not swiftly introduced,
emissions from international maritime transport could increase by
between 50% and 250% by 20507 , thereby undermining the objectives
of the Paris Agreement;
_________________ _________________7 Third IMO GHG Study. 7
Third IMO GHG Study.
Or. en
Amendment 31Marco Campomenosi, Roman Haider
Motion for a resolutionRecital E
Motion for a resolution Amendment
E. whereas all emissions from the maritime sector which are
harmful to air quality and citizens’ health should be limited and
regulated;
E. whereas all emissions from the maritime sector which are
harmful to air quality and citizens’ health should be limited and
regulated at international level within the framework established
by the IMO, while avoiding any overregulation and double standard
related to market-based measures that could be detrimental
-
PE660.197v01-00 16/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
for the European sector and economy;
Or. en
Amendment 32Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi
Katainen
Motion for a resolutionRecital E
Motion for a resolution Amendment
E. whereas all emissions from the maritime sector which are
harmful to air quality and citizens’ health should be limited and
regulated;
E. whereas all emissions from the maritime sector which are
harmful to air quality and citizens’ health should be limited and
addressed following an impact assessment of the relevant
legislation;
Or. en
Amendment 33Karima Delli
Motion for a resolutionRecital E a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ea. whereas a clear link has been established between ship
exhaust gases and a number of cardiovascular diseases, respiratory
diseases and cancer, and every year in Europe emissions from
maritime transport cause nearly 60 000 deaths and cost health
services EUR 58 billion;
Or. fr
Amendment 34Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 17/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Motion for a resolutionRecital E a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ea. whereas the EU should defend a high level of ambition for
emissions reductions in the maritime sector both at international
and EU level, and whereas any new EU measures should not undermine
the international competitiveness of EU-flagged ships;
Or. en
Amendment 35Marco Campomenosi, Julie Lechanteux, Roman
Haider
Motion for a resolutionRecital E a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ea. whereas different technologies and solutions should be
adopted depending on the type of ship and the naval segment;
Or. en
Amendment 36Marco Campomenosi, Julie Lechanteux, Roman
Haider
Motion for a resolutionRecital E b (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Eb. whereas investments and research are fundamental to ensure
innovative solutions and sustainable technologies, in particular in
terms of costs and reliability;
Or. en
-
PE660.197v01-00 18/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Amendment 37Marco Campomenosi, Roman Haider
Motion for a resolutionRecital E c (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Ec. whereas there is need of an adequate support for already
planned investments of transport sector operators that may be
hampered or postponed due to the current crisis, thus resulting in
slowing down the energy transition process;
Or. en
Amendment 38Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Ismail Ertug, Isabel García Muñoz, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Maria
Grapini, Marianne Vind
Motion for a resolutionRecital F
Motion for a resolution Amendment
F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the
maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just
transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and
structural health and safety measures for all workers;
F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the
maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just
transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs, retraining
and redeployment guarantees and structural health and safety
measures for all workers, with particular focus on opportunities
for women and young workers in order to diversify the maritime
sector workforce; whereas adequate training and decent working
conditions of maritime personnel are fundamental, among others to
prevent incidents, including environmental incidents;
Or. en
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 19/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Amendment 39Dominique Riquet
Motion for a resolutionRecital F
Motion for a resolution Amendment
F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the
maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just
transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and
structural health and safety measures for all workers;
F. whereas public and private investments related to the
decarbonisation of the maritime sector must comply with the
regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to
facilitate sustainable investment and the key principles of the
just transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and
structural health and safety measures for all workers;
Or. en
Amendment 40Giuseppe Ferrandino
Motion for a resolutionRecital F
Motion for a resolution Amendment
F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the
maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just
transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and
structural health and safety measures for all workers;
F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the
maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just
transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and
structural health and safety measures for all workers, starting by
drawing up plans aimed to accomplish a green transition for daily
maritime transport;
Or. en
Amendment 41Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Dominique
Riquet, Elsi Katainen, Pierre Karleskind
-
PE660.197v01-00 20/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolutionRecital F
Motion for a resolution Amendment
F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the
maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just
transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and
structural health and safety measures for all workers;
F. whereas investments related to the decarbonisation of the
maritime sector must comply with the key principles of the just
transition, including the creation of high-quality jobs and
structural health and safety measures for all workers, without
hampering the competitiveness of the EU maritime sector;
Or. en
Amendment 42João Ferreira
Motion for a resolutionRecital F a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Fa. whereas Article 2(15) of Regulation (EU) 2017/352 defines
‘short sea shipping’ as ‘the movement of cargo and passengers by
sea between ports situated in geographical Europe or between those
ports and ports situated in non-European countries having a
coastline on the enclosed seas bordering Europe’; whereas, due to
this new definition, short sea shipping – which used to mean only
freight transport by smaller ships (ro-ro or feeder ships) – now
includes any vessel of 14 000 TEUs, oil tankers of 200 000 GT or
LNG ships, which, in addition to posing safety problems for ports,
now benefit from support and exemptions that encourage the most
polluting practices;
Or. pt
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 21/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Amendment 43Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionRecital F a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Fa. whereas the European Commission is currently working on an
impact assessment on integrating maritime transport into the EU
Emissions Trading System (ETS);
Or. nl
Amendment 44Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Ismail Ertug, Isabel García Muñoz, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Maria
Grapini, Marianne Vind
Motion for a resolutionRecital F a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Fa. whereas a climate neutral transition of the maritime
transport sector by 2050 is needed in order to achieve the goals of
the Green Deal;
Or. en
Amendment 45Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionRecital F b (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
Fb. whereas maritime transport comprises a wide spectrum of
activities from freight and passenger transport (e.g. ferries and
cruises) to dredging, cable laying and towage;
-
PE660.197v01-00 22/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Or. nl
Amendment 46Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1
Motion for a resolution Amendment
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources;
calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to
restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays
principle to maritime transport and promoting the use of
renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime sector;
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources which
is not in line with the polluter-pays principle; calls on the
Commission to address this situation by proposing to restore fair
competition rules, provide for significant tax exemptions for
lower- and zero-carbon fuels used in maritime transport and promote
the use of renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime
sector;
Or. en
Amendment 47Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Dominique Riquet, Elsi Katainen,
Nicola Danti
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1
Motion for a resolution Amendment
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources;
calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to
restore fair competition rules, applying the
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, and clean alternative fuels from renewable
sources; calls on the Commission to address this situation by
proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying the
polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 23/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting the
use of renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime
sector;
promoting and further incentivising the use of renewable-energy
alternative fuels, including but not limited to hydrogen, ammonia
and sustainable biofuels, in the maritime sector;
Or. en
Amendment 48Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1
Motion for a resolution Amendment
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources;
calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to
restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays
principle to maritime transport and promoting the use of
renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime sector;
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources;
calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to
restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays
principle to maritime transport and promoting the use of
renewable-energy alternative fuels, as well as investing in the
transition to cleaner fuels, like LNG, lithium-ion batteries, fuel
cells and shore power, in the maritime sector;
Or. en
Amendment 49Isabel García Muñoz, Vera Tax
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1
Motion for a resolution Amendment
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit
-
PE660.197v01-00 24/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
from more favourable tax treatment, and clean alternative fuels
from renewable sources; calls on the Commission to address this
situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying
the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting the
use of renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime
sector;
from more favourable tax treatment, and clean alternative fuels
from renewable sources; calls on the Commission to address this
situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying
the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting the
use of sustainable alternative fuels, such as clean and
renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime sector;
Or. en
Amendment 50Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1
Motion for a resolution Amendment
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources;
calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to
restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays
principle to maritime transport and promoting the use of
renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime sector;
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources;
calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to
restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays
principle to maritime transport, promoting the use of
renewable-energy alternative fuels, and preventing and reducing
carbon leakage in the maritime sector;
Or. nl
Amendment 51Pablo Arias Echeverría
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1
Motion for a resolution Amendment
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 25/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and clean alternative fuels from renewable sources;
calls on the Commission to address this situation by proposing to
restore fair competition rules, applying the polluter-pays
principle to maritime transport and promoting the use of
renewable-energy alternative fuels in the maritime sector;
1. Deplores the distortion of competition on the European market
between fossil energies, which benefit from more favourable tax
treatment, and cleaner alternative fuels, including those from
renewable sources; calls on the Commission to address this
situation by proposing to restore fair competition rules, applying
the polluter-pays principle to maritime transport and promoting the
use of alternative fuels in the maritime sector, especially those
from renewable sources;
Or. es
Amendment 52Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Dominique
Riquet, Elsi Katainen, Nicola Danti, Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
1a. Stresses that the EU should defend a high level of ambition
for GHG reductions in the maritime sector both at international and
EU level, while any new EU measures should not undermine the
international competitiveness of EU flagged ships; believes that EU
and international measures should go hand in hand in order to avoid
creating double regulations for the industry1a; therefore calls for
support for the ‘Initial Strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions
from ships’ of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and
for a clear EU strategy for reducing emissions in the EU maritime
sector;_________________1a Resolution of 15 January 2020 on the
European Green Deal (2019/2956(RSP))
Or. en
-
PE660.197v01-00 26/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Amendment 53Karima Delli
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 1 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
1a. Calls, therefore, for renewable-energy alternative fuels to
be given appropriate consideration under the General Block
Exemption Regulation (GBER) declaring certain categories of aid
compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107
and 108 TFEU, to be revised for the period 2021-2027, under the
rules on State aid for environmental protection, aid for research
and development and innovation, and regional aid;
Or. fr
Amendment 54Pablo Arias Echeverría
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
deleted
Or. es
Amendment 55Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Elsi
Katainen
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 27/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
deleted
Or. en
Amendment 56Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to address effectively emissions of fuels
used by ships and reduce gradually the use of heavy fuel oil in
ships, especially through the deployment of a wide range of
sustainable alternative fuels, in full respect of the principle of
technology neutrality;
Or. en
Amendment 57Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to adapt vessels for using cleaner fuels
instead of heavy oil, while hybridisation and electrification is
becoming more viable and the EU has already financed
-
PE660.197v01-00 28/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
substantial research in this respect;
Or. en
Amendment 58Dominique Riquet
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to accelerate the transition towards a
massive use of low-carbon and zero-carbon alternative fuels in the
maritime transport sector while taking into account the
specificities of the different types of fleets and existing
technological capacities; highlights the necessity of preserving
the competitiveness of the European maritime transport sector
during this transition;
Or. en
Amendment 59Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to address emissions of fuels used by
ships; regrets that oil companies currently use maritime transport
as a way of disposing of their waste; calls on the EU Members
States to allocate resources from the EU Recovery Fund towards
research and development of clean alternative marine fuels;
Or. en
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 29/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Amendment 60Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Acknowledges the impact of the use of heavy fuel oil;
stresses the need to gradually phase out the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships, in accordance with an
international framework; notes that maritime transport is one of
the sectors affected by the lack of adequate, harmonised European
end-of-waste criteria;
Or. nl
Amendment 61Marco Campomenosi, Roman Haider
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to further develop innovative technologies
and solutions to gradually reduce emissions within the maritime
sector and ships’ dependence from fossil fuels; regrets that oil
companies currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of
their waste;
Or. en
Amendment 62Julie Lechanteux, Philippe Olivier
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
-
PE660.197v01-00 30/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; underlines the need to engage in
ongoing dialogue with shipping companies in order to determine
their actual investment capacity and identify their shortcomings as
regards the acquisition and depreciation of less polluting ships
with a view to renewal of their fleet; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
Or. fr
Amendment 63Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Ismail Ertug, Isabel García Muñoz, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Maria
Grapini, Marianne Vind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to phase-out the use of heavy fuel oil,
both in pure form and as a blending substance, as soon as possible,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
Or. en
Amendment 64Giuseppe Ferrandino
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use 2. Stresses the need to
prohibit the use
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 31/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
of heavy fuel oil, which is still used by many ships; regrets
that oil companies currently use maritime transport as a way of
disposing of their waste;
of heavy fuel oil, not only as a fuel itself but also as a
blending substance for marine fuels, which is still used by many
ships. Regrets that oil companies currently use maritime transport
as a way of disposing of their waste;
Or. en
Amendment 65Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil,
which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil companies
currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of their
waste;
2. Stresses the need to prohibit the use of heavy fuel oil in
the long-term, which is still used by many ships; regrets that oil
companies currently use maritime transport as a way of disposing of
their waste;
Or. en
Amendment 66Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Maria Spyraki, Jens
Gieseke, Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2a. Notes that, in the maritime sector, the shipowner is not
always the same as the person or entity commercially operating the
ship. Therefore, the “polluter pays” principle should apply to and
make responsible the party responsible for the commercial operation
of the ship. This is the commercial entity that pays for the fuel
that the ship consumes, such as the shipowner, the manager, the
time charterer or the bareboat charterer.
-
PE660.197v01-00 32/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Or. en
Amendment 67Emmanouil Fragkos, Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2a. Notes that, in the maritime sector, the shipowner is not
always the same as the person or entity commercially operating the
ship. Therefore, the "polluter pays" principle should apply to and
make responsible the party responsible for the commercial operation
of the ship. This is the commercial entity that pays for the fuel
that the ship consumes, such as the shipowner, the manager, the
time charterer or the bareboat charterer;
Or. en
Amendment 68Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Izaskun Bilbao
Barandica, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Dominique Riquet, Elsi Katainen,
José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2a. Stresses the importance of investing in low-emitting fuels
and finding long-term sustainable alternatives; in this regard,
recalls the importance of transitional fuels, such as LNG, as the
cleanest currently deployable alternative to heavy fuel oil,
enabling the clean energy transition of maritime transport;
Or. en
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 33/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Amendment 69Marco Campomenosi, Julie Lechanteux, Roman
Haider
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2a. stresses that the use of most alternative fuels in the
maritime sector is still hampered by economic and technical
barriers, and it is necessary to ensure the availability of mature
and sustainable technologies before imposing strict
constraints;
Or. en
Amendment 70Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 2 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
2a. Stresses that the EU can lead the way in clean shipping, but
that continued cooperation at IMO level remains essential to
achieve long-term international solutions;
Or. nl
Amendment 71Marco Campomenosi, Roman Haider
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by
3. Stresses the need not to include the European maritime
sector, as defined by
-
PE660.197v01-00 34/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading System
(ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS revenues
be channelled into the funding of research and innovation for
decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading System
(ETS)8 by January 2022, since the IMO standards can guarantee a
satisfactory regulation of the sector;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
Amendment 72Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the need for a comprehensive impact study (climate,
social, economic) to evaluate the inclusion of the European
maritime sector in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8; proposes
that possible maritime-related ETS revenues be channelled into the
funding of research and innovation for decarbonising European
maritime transport and ports;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
Amendment 73Johan Van Overtveldt
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 35/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS) by January 20228; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the possibility of including the European maritime
sector in a European market-based framework that is compatible with
international frameworks and that ensures a level playing field
globally, based on the conclusions of the Commission’s impact
assessment; proposes that maritime-related revenues be channelled
into the funding of research and innovation for decarbonising
European maritime transport and ports;
_________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. nl
Amendment 74Dominique Riquet
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the need to negotiate the reduction of CO2 emissions
of the maritime transport sector first at international level
within the IMO framework given the international and competitive
dimension of the maritime transport sector; if no solution can be
found at the IMO level in due time, calls for the implementation of
a European mechanism, in the form of the inclusion of the maritime
transport sector within the EU Emission Trading System (ETS)
following an impact assessment; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
_________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
-
PE660.197v01-00 36/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Amendment 75Pablo Arias Echeverría
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the need for the European maritime and inland
waterway transport sectors to contribute to the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions, just like other sectors; believes that
its possible inclusion in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8
should only cover journeys between EU ports and should include
exceptions for smaller vessels and small and medium-sized
enterprises; emphasises that in order to avoid compounding the
problems of flags of convenience, any regulation that affects
international transport should be agreed within the framework of
the IMO;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. es
Amendment 76Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Pierre
Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022, following an update of the impact
assessment carried out in 2013, by 31 December 2020; proposes that
at least
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 37/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
50% of maritime-related ETS revenues be channelled into the
funding a fleet renewal programme as well as research and
innovation, improving the energy efficiency of ships and supporting
investment in innovative technologies and infrastructure for
decarbonising European maritime transport sector, including
shortsea shipping and ports, and the deployment of sustainable
alternative fuels, such as hydrogen8a; strongly believes, moreover,
that the Member States should earmark these ETS related revenues to
fostering sustainable, waterborne related investments8b;
furthermore, the EU MRV Regulation (EU 2015/757, under revision),
should ensure an international level playing field for the European
fleet8c;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
8a Article 3gc of EP First reading position of Regulation (EU)
2015/7578b TRAN Opinion on Sustainable Europe Investment Plan8c
European Economic and Social Committee Opinion adopted on
15/05/2019
Or. en
Amendment 77Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Ismail Ertug, Isabel García Muñoz, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Maria
Grapini, Marianne Vind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022 in accordance with the
-
PE660.197v01-00 38/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
related ETS revenues be channelled into the funding of research
and innovation for decarbonising European maritime transport and
ports;
amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 16 September
2020 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament
and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/757 in order to
take appropriate account of the global data collection system for
ship fuel oil consumption data; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
Amendment 78Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; recalls that the inclusion of
maritime transport emissions into the EU ETS should be based on a
comprehensive impact assessment that adequately takes into
consideration the competitiveness of EU operators and businesses;
proposes that maritime-related ETS revenues be channelled into the
funding of research and innovation for decarbonising European
maritime transport and ports;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 39/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Amendment 79Henna Virkkunen, Jörgen Warborn, Deirdre Clune, Tom
Berendsen, Jens Gieseke
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; highlights the importance of
in-depth impact assessment, including risk assessment on carbon
leakage, prior to inclusion of maritime sector in the EU ETS;
proposes that maritime-related ETS revenues be channelled into the
funding of research and innovation for decarbonising European
maritime transport and ports;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
Amendment 80Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022, following a thorough impact
assessment by the Commission; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
_________________ _________________
-
PE660.197v01-00 40/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8 Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
Amendment 81Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Maria Spyraki,
Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, in the EU Emissions Trading
System (ETS)8 by January 2022; proposes that maritime-related ETS
revenues be channelled into the funding of research and innovation
for decarbonising European maritime transport and ports;
3. Stresses the need to include the European maritime sector, as
defined by Regulation (EU) 2015/757, after an impact assessment is
conducted, in the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS)8 by January
2022; proposes that all maritime-related ETS revenues be channelled
into the funding of research and innovation for decarbonising
European maritime transport and ports;
_________________ _________________8 Directive 2003/87/EC. 8
Directive 2003/87/EC.
Or. en
Amendment 82Marco Campomenosi, Julie Lechanteux, Roman
Haider
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 3 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
3a. Highlights that an overregulation aiming at the reduction of
emissions could be harmful for the competitiveness of the maritime
sector in the European Union;
Or. en
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 41/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Amendment 83Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should
also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas
emissions;
4. Calls on the Commission to address under the FuelEU Maritime
initiative not only the carbon intensity of fuels but also the
efficiency of ships and their operations as well as ensure the use
of existing and future alternative fuels infrastructure through a
goal-based approach; recalls that, in the context of the revision
of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Parliament called on shipping
companies to achieve a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030; adds
that the initiative should also include a life-cycle approach
incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions;
Or. en
Amendment 84Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should
also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas
emissions;
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
adds that the initiative should also include a life-cycle approach
incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions;
Or. en
-
PE660.197v01-00 42/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Amendment 85Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Dominique
Riquet, Elsi Katainen
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should
also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas
emissions;
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the technical and operational measures, which
would boost the efficiency of ships and their operations; recalls
that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)2015/757,
Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40% reduction
in emissions by 2030 as an average across all ships under their
responsibility, compared to the average performance per category of
ships of the same size and type as reported under the MRV
Regulation; adds that the initiative should also include a
life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions;
Or. en
Amendment 86Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Giuseppe Ferrandino, Marianne Vind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 43/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
2030; adds that the initiative should also include a life-cycle
approach incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions;
2030; adds that the initiative should also include a life-cycle
approach incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions; alternative
fuels that do not meet the REDII -70% threshold on a life-cycle
basis should not be allowed for regulatory compliance;
food/feed-based biofuels should be excluded from the list of
compliant fuels and the contribution of advanced biofuels should be
capped;
Or. en
Amendment 87Julie Lechanteux, Philippe Olivier
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should
also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas
emissions;
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should
also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas
emissions; stresses that the binding target of 40% by 2030 for
shipping companies, which will need to replace equipment, comes in
the midst of a global economic crisis linked to the COVID-19
pandemic; notes that this constitutes a major handicap from the
outset for a maritime sector in the process of energy transition
and must be taken into account, given that the sector is already
being seriously undermined, with matters likely to become still
worse over the coming years;
Or. fr
-
PE660.197v01-00 44/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Amendment 88Andris Ameriks
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations;
recalls that, in the context of the revision of Regulation (EU)
2015/757, Parliament called on shipping companies to achieve a 40%
reduction in emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should
also include a life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas
emissions;
4. Notes that the FuelEU Maritime initiative should address not
only fuels but also the efficiency of ships and their operations as
well as ensure the use of existing and future alternative fuels
infrastructure through a goal-based approach; recalls that, in the
context of the revision of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, Parliament
called on shipping companies to achieve a 40% reduction in
emissions by 2030; adds that the initiative should also include a
life-cycle approach incorporating all greenhouse gas emissions;
Or. en
Amendment 89Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4a. Notes the strong European maritime cluster and the positive
developments internationally to support innovation and reduce
shipping emissions and calls on the Commission and the Member
States to support initiatives contributing these positive
developments;
Or. en
Amendment 90Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Ismail Ertug, Isabel García Muñoz, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Maria
Grapini, Marianne Vind
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 45/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 4 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
4a. Calls on the Commission to propose a contracts for
difference scheme to help bridge the price gap between fossil fuels
and sustainable alternative marine fuels; maritime-related ETS
revenues could be used to finance such a scheme;
Or. en
Amendment 91Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Elżbieta
Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Maria Spyraki
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the
decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders, including shipping lines, ports and energy providers,
in order to facilitate bottom-up initiatives and framework
agreements for the decarbonisation and greening of maritime
transport to the benefit of ports and coastal areas; stresses the
role of ports and fuel suppliers in developing lower- and
zero-carbon fuels and the infrastructure necessary for their
uptake;
Or. en
Amendment 92Andris Ameriks
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5
-
PE660.197v01-00 46/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the
decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders, including shipping lines, ports and energy providers,
in order to facilitate bottom-up initiatives and framework
agreements for the decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
Or. en
Amendment 93Pablo Arias Echeverría
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the
decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for
decarbonisation and reduction of pollution in ports and coastal
areas;
Or. es
Amendment 94Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Dominique
Riquet, Elsi Katainen, Nicola Danti, Pierre Karleskind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the
decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders and exchange of best practices between ports, the
shipping sector as well as fuel and energy suppliers in order to
develop an overall policy framework for the decarbonisation of
ports and coastal areas;
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 47/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Or. en
Amendment 95Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Ismail Ertug, Isabel García Muñoz, Giuseppe Ferrandino, Maria
Grapini, Marianne Vind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the
decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders, including shipping lines, ports and energy providers,
in order to develop an overall policy for the decarbonisation of
ports and coastal areas;
Or. en
Amendment 96Izaskun Bilbao Barandica (Renew)
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the
decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas;
5. Recalls the need to encourage cooperation between all
stakeholders in order to develop an overall policy for the
decarbonisation of ports and coastal areas; urges the port
authorities to put in place sustainable management methods and to
certify them using methodologies that incorporate a Life Cycle
Assessment of the port services, such as that offered by the
Environmental Product Declaration;
Or. es
Amendment 97Dominique Riquet, Stéphane Bijoux
-
PE660.197v01-00 48/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5a. Stresses that overseas territories, including Outermost
regions and Overseas countries and territories, and the ports
located therein, are of paramount importance to the European
sovereignty and to the European and international maritime trade
given their strategic location; highlights that investment drivers
for these ports are very diverse, ranging from supporting their
classic role for the reception of ships (loading, unloading,
storage and transport of goods) to ensuring multimodal connections,
constructing energy-related infrastructures, building resilience to
climate change and the overall greening and digitalisation of
vessels; calls for massive investments in ports located in overseas
territories to turn them into strategic clusters for multi-modal
transport, energy generation, storage and distribution as well as
tourism;
Or. en
Amendment 98Isabel García Muñoz, Vera Tax
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5a. Highlights that boosting seamless multimodal transport links
between ports and the TEN-T network as well as improving
interoperability between the various modes of transport, would
eliminate bottlenecks and reduce congestion; underlines the
importance of
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 49/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
maritime and inland ports as strategic and multimodal nodes of
the TEN-T network;
Or. en
Amendment 99Marco Campomenosi, Julie Lechanteux, Roman
Haider
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5a. Notes the strong efforts made by the European maritime
cluster and the positive developments reached at international
level to support innovation and reduce shipping emissions; calls on
the Commission and the Member States to support initiatives
contributing these positive developments.
Or. en
Amendment 100István Ujhelyi
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5a. Notes the strong European maritime cluster and the positive
developments internationally to support innovation and reduce
shipping emissions and calls on the Commission and the Member
States to support initiatives contributing these positive
developments.
Or. en
Amendment 101
-
PE660.197v01-00 50/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Henna Virkkunen, Jörgen Warborn, Deirdre Clune, Tom Berendsen,
Jens Gieseke
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5 a (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5a. Notes the positive role of European maritime cluster in
encouraging innovation to reduce shipping emissions; calls on the
Commission and the Member States to further support research and
development initiatives in the sector;
Or. en
Amendment 102Isabel García Muñoz, Vera Tax
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 5 b (new)
Motion for a resolution Amendment
5b. Notes the cross-border dimension of maritime ports; stresses
the role of ports as clusters of all modes of transport, energy,
industry and blue economy; recognises the increased development of
port cooperation and clustering;
Or. en
Amendment 103Magdalena Adamowicz, Marian-Jean Marinescu,
Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 51/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
the development and deployment of clean solutions in the
maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take
swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
the development and deployment of clean solutions in the
maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to ensure
that the current Port State Control legislative framework remains a
solid basis for regulating access of environmentally non-compliant
ships to ports, and to promote onshore power supply using green
electricity or any other renewable energy as well as other
equivalent alternative solutions; calls also on the Commission to
propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. en
Amendment 104Andris Ameriks
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission to ensure that the current port
state control legislative framework remains a solid basis for
regulating access of environmentally non-compliant ships to ports
and to promote OPS using green electricity or any other renewable
energy, as well as other equivalent alternative solutions; calls
also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. en
Amendment 105Johan Van Overtveldt
-
PE660.197v01-00 52/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission to use the existing legislative
framework on port state control as its point of departure for the
most polluting ships;calls on the Commission to introduce a
requirement for cold ironing using low-carbon energy sources and
other equivalent technologies; calls also on the Commission to
propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. nl
Amendment 106Caroline Nagtegaal, Søren Gade, Jan-Christoph
Oetjen, José Ramón Bauzá Díaz, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Dominique
Riquet, Elsi Katainen, Nicola Danti
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean, multimodal solutions in ports,
supported through a corridor approach; calls on the Commission, in
particular, to incentivise port authorities to take swift action to
regulate port access for the most polluting ships, and encourage
the use and deployment of shore-side electricity using green
electricity or any other renewable energy; calls also on the
Commission to propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and
2003/96/EC;
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 53/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
Or. en
Amendment 107Pablo Arias Echeverría
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to assess the reduction in polluting
and greenhouse gas emissions through cold ironing; calls also on
the Commission to propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and
2003/96/EC;
Or. es
Amendment 108Marian-Jean Marinescu
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of low emissions at berth, and to promote the development
and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime sector; calls on
the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate
port access for the most polluting ships and to introduce a
requirement for cold ironing using green electricity or any other
renewable energy; calls also on the Commission to propose
-
PE660.197v01-00 54/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
Commission to propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and
2003/96/EC;
revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. en
Amendment 109Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate EU port access for the most polluting ships and
to introduce a requirement for cold ironing using green electricity
or any other renewable energy; calls also on the Commission to
propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. pt
Amendment 110Carlo Fidanza
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships, and to
introduce a
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 55/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
to introduce a requirement for cold ironing using green
electricity or any other renewable energy; calls also on the
Commission to propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and
2003/96/EC;
requirement for cold ironing using green electricity or any
other renewable energy; calls also on the Commission to propose
revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. en
Amendment 111Marco Campomenosi, Roman Haider
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships, and to
introduce a requirement for cold ironing using green electricity or
any other renewable energy; calls also on the Commission to propose
revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. en
Amendment 112István Ujhelyi
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on
-
PE660.197v01-00 56/117 AM\1217565EN.docx
EN
the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate
port access for the most polluting ships, including cruise ships,
and to introduce a requirement for cold ironing using green
electricity or any other renewable energy; calls also on the
Commission to propose revisions to Directives 2014/94/EU and
2003/96/EC;
the Commission, in particular, to take swift action to regulate
port access for the most polluting ships, and to introduce a
requirement for cold ironing using green electricity or any other
renewable energy; calls also on the Commission to propose revisions
to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. en
Amendment 113Tom Berendsen, Henna Virkkunen, Jörgen Warborn
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
6. Calls on the Commission to support, through legislation, the
objective of zero emissions at berth, and to promote the
development and deployment of clean solutions in the maritime
sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take swift
action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using renewable and zero- and low-carbon energy sources;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
Or. en
Amendment 114Vera Tax, Johan Danielsson, Kathleen Van Brempt,
Ismail Ertug, Isabel García Muñoz, Marianne Vind
Motion for a resolutionParagraph 6
Motion for a resolution Amendment
6. Calls on the Commission to 6. Calls on the Commission to
-
AM\1217565EN.docx 57/117 PE660.197v01-00
EN
support, through legislation, the objective of zero emissions at
berth, and to promote the development and deployment of clean
solutions in the maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in
particular, to take swift action to regulate port access for the
most polluting ships, including cruise ships, and to introduce a
requirement for cold ironing using green electricity or any other
renewable energy; calls also on the Commission to propose revisions
to Directives 2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC;
support, through legislation, the objective of zero pollution
(greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants) at berth, and to
promote the development and deployment of clean solutions in the
maritime sector; calls on the Commission, in particular, to take
swift action to regulate port access for the most polluting ships,
including cruise ships, and to introduce a requirement for cold
ironing using green electricity or any other renewable energy;
calls also on the Commission to propose revisions to Directives
2014/94/EU and 2003/96/EC; regrets that the revision of Directive
2014/94/EU has been postponed; urges the Commission to prop