Top Banner
Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10% 11%–20% 21%–35% 36%–50% 51%–91% Elementary School
13

Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Jan 04, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low-

and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools

PERCENT OF CHILDRENRECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH

0%–10%

11%–20%

21%–35%

36%–50%

51%–91%

Elementary School

Page 2: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Montgomery County’s Economically Integrative Housing Approach

• Oldest, largest inclusionary zoning program in U.S.

• Housing authority has right to purchase 1/3 of inclusionary zoning units

• ~700 public housing homes scattered, and ~300 located in 5 public housing developments

Page 3: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Public Housing Distributed Broadly Throughout Hundreds of Neighborhoods

Page 4: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

I Find Large, Positive Cumulative Effects in Math

Page 5: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Public Housing Students in Green Zone Schools Outperformed Those in Red Zone

Schools

Page 6: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Impact on adult’s social networks

10

20

30

40

50

10

20

30

40

50

10

20

30

40

50

10

20

30

40

50

10

20

30

40

50

.10

.30

.50

.20

.40

0-2 2-6 7-11 12-37 0-2 2-6 7-11 12-37 0-2 2-6 7-11 12-37

0-2 2-6 7-11 12-37 0-2 2-6 7-11 12-37 0-2 2-6 7-11 12-37

Low SES (%) High SES (%) Different race (%)

Provided emotionalsupport (%)

Could provide jobadvice (%)

Density of network

scatterd public housing clustered public housing

Pre

dic

ted m

ean

Years in neighborhood

Page 7: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Who Are the Children in the Study?

• Examined 858 children who lived in public housing scattered throughout Montgomery County & enrolled in MCPS during 2001-2007

• Public housing apts. spread across 250 out of 550 total neighborhoods

• Attended 114 of 131 elementary schools

• Families randomly assigned to public housing

Page 8: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Back-up slides for Heather

Page 9: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

African-American 72%Hispanic 16%White 6%Asian 6%Average family income $21,047

Average family assets $775

Female headed household 87%Average length of tenancy 8.4 years

What Are the Characteristics of Children and Families in the Study?

Page 10: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

There Is Another Way to Measure School Disadvantage

• In 2000, MCPS adopted red zone/green zone policy

• It created 60 red zone elementary schools

• Extra investments in red zone schools:

– First to receive full-day kindergarten

– Class size reduction in grades 1–3

– 100 hours professional development for teacher

– Specialized instruction: 90-minute literacy; 60-minute math blocks in 1st & 2nd grade

• The average class size in red vs. green zone: 19 vs. 23

Page 11: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

I Find Smaller Effects from Neighborhood Poverty

Page 12: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

Conclusions

• School-based economic integration effects accrued over time

• Public housing children who went to low-poverty schools (green zone) outperformed their low-income peers who attended higher-poverty but higher-spending elementary schools (red zone)

• Inclusionary zoning integrated children from highly disadvantaged families into low-poverty neighborhoods and low-poverty schools over long term

• Children in public housing benefited academically from living in low-poverty neighborhoods– But less than they did from attending low-poverty schools

Page 13: Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10%

District’s Intervention in 60 Focus Schools Boosts Students’ Adv. Scores

60 focus schools

comparison schools in state

Tre

atm

ent s

tart

s in

60

focu

s sc

hoo

ls

NC

LB

sta

rts;

new

sta

te te

st

01

02

03

04

05

0P

ct. o

f 3rd

gra

de

stud

ents

sco

ring

adv

ance

d in

mat

h

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006School year