Top Banner
Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic [email protected]
32

Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Dec 28, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of

animal products

Eva Skřivanová

University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic

[email protected]

Page 2: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

ANTIBIOTICS

• Penicillin: A. Fleming, 1929• First „Clinical trial“• 29. 11. 1942

• The most destructive fire accident in USA since 1903• Penicillin has been given to patients with burn wounds • Better skin grafts acceptance - prevention of infection in

burned patients ans its spreading to their system – the best results achieved so far

• „Miracle drug“

Levy, 2002

Page 3: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

ANTIBIOTICS

„There may be a danger, though, in underdosage. It is not difficult to make microbes resistant to penicillin in the laboratory by exposing them to concentrations not sufficient to kill them, and the same thing has occasionally happened in the body. “

A. Fleming, Nobel Lecture, 1945

Page 4: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

ATB resistance, Europe

Page 5: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

ATB resistance, Europe

Page 6: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibiotics in animal nutrition

• Prevention of GIT infections (mainly after weaning)

• Lowering of the risk of contamination of animal products

• Production traits enhancement

Page 7: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibiotics in animal nutrition

• Prevention of GIT infections (mainly after weaning)

• Lowering of the risk of contamination of animal products

• Production traits enhancement

F

EED SUPPLEMENTS

Page 8: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibiotics in animal nutrition

• Worldwide since 50-ies of the last century

• Resistance: reduction in their use

• January 2006: restricted in EU (based on the EU Regulation no. 1831/2003

Page 9: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibiotics in animal nutrition

December 2013

Page 10: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

• In-feed ATB restriction:

– ↓ production

– ↓ health (GIT infections around weaning in particuar)

– ↑ risk of bacterial contamination of animal products

– ↑ costs

Page 11: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Alternatives to in-feed ATB

• Probiotics, prebiotics

• Bacteriocins

• Enzymes

• Plant extracts, essential oils

• Antibodies

• Organic acids

Page 12: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Organic acids

• Feed & food preservatives

• Animal nutrition:– Growth & performance enhancers– Antibacterial properties

Page 13: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Organic acids

• Feed & food preservatives

• Animal nutrition:– Growth & performance enhancers– Antibacterial properties

MCFA (C8:0 – C12:0)

Page 14: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibacterial effect of fatty acids in vivo

-Experimental infection of chickens with C. jejuni-Caprylic acid (C8:0)-Concentrations 0.35 % - 1.4 %-Last week of the fattening period (7 days or 3 days)

Page 15: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibacterial effect of fatty acidsin vivo

S. de los Santos a kol., Poultry Science 2009

Page 16: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibacterial effect of fatty acids in vivo

-Cuphea lanceolata a C. ignea seeds-Rich in MCFA-5 % addition to feed-Combined with exogenous lipase

- The effect on performance and GIT microflora- Improvement was not statistically signifficant

Page 17: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibacterial effect of fatty acidsin vivo: IAS Prague

- Experimental infections of rabbits & chickens

-Effect of MCFA on GIT microbiota

-Field experiments

Page 18: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Antibacterial effect of fatty acidsin vivo: IAS Prague

- Experimental infections of rabbits & chickens

-Effect of MCFA on GIT microbiota

-Field experiments

Page 19: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

I. Experimental infections

Page 20: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

• 88 broiler Hypuls rabbits, weaned at 35D• Individual cages

• Negative control• Positive control• 0.5 % C8 FA• 1 % C8 + C10 TAG

• Bacterial shedding• Performance• Health status

E. coli O103

Page 21: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

The effect of C8 and Akomed R on E. coli shedding in terms of experimental infection of broiler rabbits

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2 6 9 13

Dny po infekci

Lo

g10

CF

U/g Negativní kontrola

Pozitivní kontrola

Pokusná skupina I (C8)

Pokusná skupina II (Akomed R)

Skřivanová et al., Veterinary Microbiology 2008

a

b

b ab

a

b

cc

a

b

c c

a

b

cc

abcColumns with a different superscript are significantly different within the group (p < 0,05)

Days post-infection

Negative controlPositive controlTreatment I (C8)Treatment II (Akomed R)

Page 22: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

I. Experimental infections

Page 23: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

The effect of C8 and Akomed R on E. coli shedding in terms of experimental infection of broiler rabbits

Skřivanová et al., Veterinary Microbiology 2009

a

b

ab

ab

a

b

cc

a

b

c c

a

b

c

c

a

b

c

c

a

b

aa

Negative controlPositive controlTreatment I (C8)Treatment II (Akomed R)

abcColumns with a different superscript are significantly different within the group (p < 0,05)

Page 24: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

I. Experimental infections

Page 25: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

I. Experimental infections

• 48 broiler chickens• Induvidual cages

• Negative control• Positive control• C8 + C10 free, 0.5 %• C8 + C10 coated, 0.5 %

• Bacterial shedding• Performance• Health status

Campylobacter jejuni

Page 26: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Experimental timeline

Page 27: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

The effect of free and coated MCFA on C. jejuni shedding in terms of experimental infection of broiler chickens

Age of chickens

(days)

Treatment group

1 2 3 4

Basal diet

No infection

Free acids

Infection

Protected acids

Infection

Basal diet

Infection

16 <DLa <DLa <DLa <DLa

18 <DLa 3.41 ± 0.67b 3.38 ± 0.66b 3.73 ± 0.68b

21 <DLa <DLa <DLa <DLa

24 <DLa 3.09 ± 20b 3.37 ± 0.90b 3.25 ± 0.45b

28 <DLa 3.67 ± 0.58b 3.37 ± 0.60b 3.40 ± 0.49b

30 <DLa 5.31 ± 0.62b 3.09 ± 0.29c 7.27 ± 0.65d

32 <DLa 6.97 ± 1.06b 6.39 ± 1.65b 8.20 ± 0.49c

35 <DLa 7.64 ± 0.98b 5.95 ± 1.50c 7.11 ± 0.98b

37 <DLa 6.29 ± 1.31b 6.56 ± 1.43bc 7.51 ± 0.95c

39 <DLa 5.89 ± 1.55b 6.81 ± 1.54b 6.89 ± 0.72b

Page 28: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Salmonella infection + surface treatment of chilled broiler chicken

2014

Page 29: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis

• Dietary supplementation of C8:0

– 0.25 % and 0.5 %– reduction of salmonellas in crop and caecum

• Surface treatment of chilled chicken carcasses– 0.125 % and 0.25 %

– reduced salmonellas on a surface by 1 – 2 Log10 CFU/g of skin

– sensory traits

Page 30: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Fatty acids in animal nutrition

• Effective in young animals or during the entire fattening

• Prevention of GIT infections

• Lower bacterial shedding

• Lower risk of contamination of animal products

• Can be used as a surface-treatment (with some limitations)

• Broiler rabbits, chickens, pigs

Page 31: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Thank you for your attention!

Page 32: Alternatives to in-feed antibiotics and their impact on the safety of animal products Eva Skřivanová University of Life Sciences in Prague, Czech Republic.

Consumption of veterinary chemotherapeuticals in the Czech Republic: ANTIBIOTICS (Hera et al., 2009)

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

[kg]

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Amfenikoly Aminoglykosidy Ansamyciny Cefalosporiny

Diterpeny Linkosamidy Makrolidy Penicilinová

Penicilinová + CL Polypeptidy Tetracykliny Různá ATB