Top Banner
TCN 42D4 / RI REPORT REV. #1 30/SEPT/91 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY i ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) REGION III CONTRACT #68-W8-0092 WORK ASSIGNMENT #92-04-3LQ6 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDICES SEPTEMBER 199t BUTZ LANDFILL JACKSON TOWNSHIP MONROE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TETRA TECH, INC. It TCN 4204 1 3R30J035
195

ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Jul 21, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 42D4 /RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYi

ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS)

REGION III

CONTRACT #68-W8-0092

WORK ASSIGNMENT #92-04-3LQ6

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYAPPENDICES

SEPTEMBER 199t

BUTZ LANDFILL

JACKSON TOWNSHIPMONROE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

TETRA TECH, INC.

ItTCN 4204

1 3R30J035

Page 2: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX A SITE SURVEY INFORMATION

Property Line DescriptionsSample Location Coordinates

APPENDIX B WETLANDS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION

Wetland Data FormsAPPENDIX C SEDIMENT/SURFACE WATER INVESTIGATION INFORMATION

Grain Size DataTCL/TAL Sample Results

APPENDIX D ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

Detailed Ecological EvaluationsStream Sampling Data SheetsTerrestrial Vegetation Data SheetsBenthic Sample OrganismsBenthic QA/QCPhoto Documentation

APPENDIX E SOIL INVESTIGATION INFORMATION

Test Pit LogsTest Boring LogsTCL/TAL Sample Results

APPENDIX F GEOLOGIC/HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION INFORMATION

Well Construction LogWell Sampling LogsResidential Well Data SheetsGeophysical Borehole Logs (in back pockets)Summary of LithologiesTCL/TAL Sample Results

APPENDIX G RISK ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

Toxilogical ProfilesAPPENDIX H FEASIBILITY STUDY COST ESTIMATES

Detailed Cost Estimates

ftR3QI036

Page 3: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

APPENDIX A

SITE SURVEY INFORMATION

AR30I037

Page 4: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

APPENDIX A-l

PROPERTY LINE DESCRIPTION

flR30f038

Page 5: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (AS SHOWN ON A PROPERTY WORKSHEET PREPARED BYTETRA TECH RICHARDSON, DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1991) SITUATE IN THETOWNSHIP OF JACKSON, MONROE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

PARCEL 1 - OWNER: ERNEST W. BUTZ AND EMMA E. BUTZ, H/WSOURCE OF TITLE: DEED VOLUME 96, PAGE 60 •BEGINNING at a point in the center!ine of Public Road T601, said pointbeing a common corner for the lands herein being described and landsnow or late of Guthrie L. Strausser (Deed Volume 1160, Page 16).

.THENCE from the said point of beginning, along the said centerline ofPublic Road T601, N 55° 54' 14" E, 332.11' (N 58° 20' 09" E, 341.60'grantor's deed) to a point, a corner for lands of Russell C. Butz andLuella T. Butz; ; i

THENCE by the same, S 50° 05' 21" E, 932.73' (S 50° 11' 00" E, 992.45'grantor's deed) to a found 1/2" iron rebar, a corner for lands now orlate of Leroy Rinker, et ux. (Deed Volume 346, Page 605);

THENCE by the same, S 75° 39' 17" W, 342.45' (S 75° 20' 30" W, 347.87'grantor's deed) to a found 1/2" iron rebar, a corner for lands now orlate of William C. Wood]ing, et ux. (Deed Volume 318, Page 1070);

THENCE by the same, N 26° 04' 49" W, 308.08' (N 26° 21' 00" W, 310.06'grantor's deed) to a found 1/2" iron rebar;

; I

THENCE still by the same, and along the northerly terminus of a 30'wide right-of-way, S 68° 25' 34" W, 432.13' (S 69° 22' 43" W, 433.74'grantor's deed) to a found iron pipe (stone grantor's deed), a cornerfor said lands now or late of Guthrie L. Strausser;

: * iTHENCE by the same, N 17° 44' 45" W (N 17' 38' 34" W, grantor's deed)and crossing over a rock with a chiseled "X" mark (Iron pipe grantor'sdeed) at 368.24' (362.30' grantor's deed), a total distance of 398.24'(392.30' grantor's deed) to a point in the said centerline of PublicRoad T601, the first mentioned point and place of beginning.

CONTAINING within said described metes and bounds 6.6043 acres of land(6.652 acres, more or less, grantor's deed), be the same more or less.

fiR30IQ39

Page 6: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

PARCEL 2 (RESIDUE PROPERTY) - OWNER: RUSSELL C. BUTZ AND LUELLA T.BUTZ, H/WSOURCE OF TITLE: DEED VOLUME 308, PAGE 67

BEGINNING at a point in the centerline of Public Road T601, said pointbeing a common corner for the lands herein being described and ParcelOne being lands now or late of Ernest W. Butz and Emma E, Butz (DeedVolume 968, Page 60).

THENCE from the said point of beginning, along the said centerline ofPublic Road T601, N 40° 05' 00" E, 300.00' to a point in line of landsnow or late of Robert H. Miner (Deed Volume 763, Page 104);

THENCE by the same, the two (2) following described courses anddistances: i1. S 81° 15' 00" E, 340.74' (237.00* grantors deed) to a corner

(maple tree grantor's deed not found); and,2. S 01° 00' 00" E, 171.78' (173.00' grantor's deed) to a corner

(dogwood tree grantor's deed not found);> !

THENCE still by the same, and along lands now or late of Robert C.Riday (Deed Volume 1451, Page 1055), N 87° 55' 00" E, 166.00' to acorner (iron grantor's deed not found);

THENCE still along said lands now or late of Robert C. Riday, andalong lands now or late of Leroy Rinker, et ux. (Deed Volume 346, Page605), S 14° 30' 00" W, 296.00' to a found 1" iron pipe (oak treegrantor's deed); !

1 i

THENCE still along said lands now or late of Leroy Rinker, the two (2)following described courses and distances:

1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to afound 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and,

2. S 02° 48' 22" E, 308.11' (N 00° 45' W, 312.00' grantor's deed) toa found 1/2" Iron rebar, a corner for said lands now or former ofErnest W. Butz and Emma E. Butz;

: i

THENCE by the same, N 50° 05' 21" W, 932.73' to a point in the said.centerline of Public Road T601, the first mentioned point and place ofbeginning. , |

CONTAINING within said described metes and bounds 6.6166 acres ofland, be the same more or less. , |

i

BOTH parcels are subject to any restrictions, easements and agreementsof record.

Page 7: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. tl

30/SEPT/91

SAMPLE LOCATION COORDINATES

Page 8: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

COORDINATES OFBUTZ LANDFILL

CoordinatesLocation 1 North

TP-l

TP-2.

TP-3TP-4

TP-5TP-6TP-7TP-8TP-9TP-10TP-11TP-l 2TP-l 3TP-14TP-15TP-16TP-17TP-18TP-19TP-19ATP-20TP-21TP-22TP-23TP-24TP-25TP-31SS-1SS-2SS-3SS-4ss-sss-aSS-7ss-a53-9SS-10SS-11

5196.15265.55112.75173.45251.75311.54960.75022.35080.55132.94985.95012.25062.94955.44997.64903.45047.85019.64839.24865.54868.84882.04921.44740.24656.04790.54860.05119.5527 .34965.95112.75173.45311. 54839.24903.45019.64508.64579.3

East

5350.25417.15328.15406.75515.15613.55469.45539.85601.95680.45637.25685.65743.05713.65765.75632.45910.15814.95520.45542.85731.35746.75805. 85868.95663.65610.75896.55102.85270.65210.25328.15406.75613.55520.45632.55814.95704.55825.2

Coorcfl natesLocation

SS-12SS-13T-l-AT-l-ST1-1AT1-1BR1-1AR1-1BR-l-5R-l-0BOR-1BOR-280R-3BOR-4BOR-5WET-1WET- 2WET-3WET-4WET-5WET-6WET-7WET-8WET-9PL-900PL-901PL-902PL-903PL-904PL- 905PL-906PL-907PL-908PL-909PL-910PL-911PL-912

North4801.04888.64780.24827.14758.74617.947Z5.24601.44762.24773.55085.15225.05291.95041.04882.75074.25223.75261.34908.35042.55110.64707.44775.04823.14781.44622.55001.85187.95417.55365.65193.95199.94913.34897.24589.54504.75141.6

East5909.66063.15949.95949.35593.5

5821.95616.45816.25957.65952.45271.55450.05595.35758.75795.45438.05593.35650.95507.45686.95830.15669.25775.15914.25524.95123.05001.65276.05469.85306.65809.65975.55901.45977.05992.15660.35260.5

REFERENCE: DEED COORDINATE SYSTEM

Page 9: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

:: ,,';:•;":.'::.":" -<; APPENDIX 1 S'iilE

WETLANDS INVESTIGATIONINFORMATM

flR30IOI»3

Page 10: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

APPENDIX*

WETLANDS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION

Page 11: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

DAf/l FQRHSI

Page 12: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

DATA FORMROUTINE ON-S1TE DETERMINATION METHOD

Field Investfgator(s): Mary Muselti. Charles BartettProject/Sit*.: Butz Landfill State: Pennsylvania County: MonroeApplicant/Owner USEPA Plant Community #/Nam*: BLWET 1 and 8Do normal environmental conditions •xist? (if no, see report)Has on* or more of the parameters been significantly disturbed?(If yes, see report)

DOMINANT PLANT SPECiESPrunus serotina FACU saplingRhus glabra UPL saplingRhus typnina UPL saplingRhus eopaillna Nl saplingRosa multiflora PACU shrubRubua allegheniensis FACU shrubPhytotaeea amerieana FACU shrubAJIium vineai* FACU herbSotidago spp. herb

10 Andropogon spp.11 lpo<no*« purpuraa UPL herb12 A»t»r spp. vin«131415

Percent of dominant specie* that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: V£Is the hydrophyte vegetation critefion met? __. Ye» X NoRationale: less than 50% hydrophyte vegetation

SOIL*1

Seriee/phaae; Subgroup:la the toil on the hydrie sotii list?_______________(yea, no, undetermined)Is the so* a Histoeot? no Hitfle eptpedon present? noIs the soil: Mottled? no __ Gleyed? noMatrix eoior: 5YR4/3 Mottte coiors:Other hydric set) indicators;Is the hydrie sort criterion met? noRationale: matrix chroma > 2 at 18"

HYDROLOGY

Is the ground surface inundated? no Surface Water Deplh: 0Is the toil saturated? noDepth to free-standing water in ptVtai probe hoi*: not encounteredList other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:

is the wetland hydrology criterion met?Rationale:

JURISOtCnONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE

Is the plant community a wetiand? noRationale for jurisdietionaj decision: lacks mandatory hydrology criteria:

1 Dominant piant specie* ere listed by stratum starting with canopy and ending

1 For additional Information se* soi boring log*.

Page 13: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

DATA FORMROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD

Field lnvestfgator(s): Mary Musetti. Charles BartettProject/Site: Butt LandfillApplicant/Own*: USEPADo normal environmental conditions exist? (If no, see report)

Date: 2-13-91State: Pennsylvania County: MonroePlant Community #/Name: BLWET 2, 3, 4. 5no

Has on* or more of the parameters been significantly disturbed? yes(If y*s, so* report)

VEGETATION'

123456739101112131415

DOMINANT PLANT SPECIESAster spp.Solidago spp.Andropogon virginicusOenothera biennisS«taria spp.Rubus allegheniensisRosa multifloraIpomoea purpureaRhus typhinaAc«r rubrumBotula papyrrfera

INDJC. STAT

——FACUFACU—FACUFACUUPlUPLFACFACU

STRAT.herbherbherbherbherbshrubshrubvinesaplingsaplingsapling

Percent of dominant species that are OBL FACW, and/or FAC: 12.5%Is the hydrophyte vegetation criterion met? __ YeeRationale: leas than 50% hydrophyte vegetation

SOILS1

Series/phase: Subgroup:Is the soil on the hydric soils list? __ _________(yes, no, undetermined)Is the soil a Hlstosol? no Histic epipedon present? noIs the soil: Mottled? no Gleyed? noMatrix color: 5YR4/3 Mottle colors:Other hydric soil indicators:Is the hydric soil criterion met? hoRationale: matrix chroma > 2 at 18*

HYDROLOGY

Is the ground surface inundated? no________________| Surface Water Depth: 0Is the soil saturated? noDepth to free-standing water in prtfsoil probe hole: not encounteredList other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:

Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? noRationale: lack of indicator*

JtlHWOXmONAL OETERMJMATiOtt AND RATIONALE

Is the plant community a wetland? noRationale for jurisdiction*! decision: lacks mandatory hydrology criteria

' Dominant plant species are listed by stratum starting with canopy and endingwith groundcover. The first species listed for each stratum is the dominantspecie* for that stratum.

1 Fbr additional information see soil boring logs. , fl R ^ fi I H f 7

Page 14: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

DATA FORMROUTINE ON-SfTE DETERMINATION METHOD

Field lnv«8tigatof(8); Mary MusetH. Charles 8aiH«ttProject/Site: Bute Landfill State: Pannsylvania County: MonroeApplicant/Owner: USEPA Plant Community #/Name: BLWET 7, 8, 9Do normal environmental conditions exist? (If no, soe report)Has one or more of the parameters been significantly disturbed? yes(If yes, see

DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES

Solidago spp. herbAster spp. herbAndropogon spp. herbPanicum spp. herbPrunella vulgaris FACU herbRubus allegheniensis FACU shrubRhua glabra UPL saplingRhus typhina UPL saplingComptonia peregrins UPL shrub

10 Myrica pensylvanica FAC shrub1112131415

Percent of dominant specie* that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 17%Is the hydrophytte vegetation criterion met? __ Ye« X HoRationale: less than 50% hydrophyte vegetation____________

SOILS?Series/phase: Subgroup:Is the soil on the hydric soils list?______ ________(yee, no. undetermined)Is the soil a Histosol? no __ Histte eplpedon present? noIs the soil: Mottled? no______Gleyed? noMatrix color: 5YR4/3 Motfle colors:Other hydric soil indicators:Is the hydrie soil criterion met? noRationale: matrix chroma >2 at 18*

HYDROLOGY

Is the ground surface inundated? no Surface Water Depth: 0Is the soil saturated? noDepth to free-sanding water In piVsoil probe hole: not encounteredList other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:

Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? noRationale: lack of Indicators

JUfllSCHCnONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE

Is the plant community a wetland? noRationale for jurisdictionai decision: lacks mandatory hydrology criteria

1 Dominant plant speciee are listed by stratum starting with canopy and endingwith groundcover. The first speciee listed for each stratum is the dominantspeciee for that stratum.

1 For additional Information see soil boring logs. A R 3 0 I 0 fy 8

Page 15: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

DATA FORMROUTINE ON-SFTE DETERMINATION METHOD

Fi*ld Investigators): Mary Musetti, Charles BartettProject/Site: Butt LandfillApplicant/Owner USEPADo normal environmental conditions exist? {If no, see report)

State: PennsylvaniaDate: 2/13/91County: Monro*

Plant Community #/Name: BLWET 10, 11, 12yes

Has on* or more of the parameters been significantly disturbed? no(If yea, see report) _____________________________________________

VEGETATION'

123456789101112131415

DOMINANT PLANT SPECIES

Solidago spp.Juncus effususEpilobium leptophyllumPolygonum spp.Scirpus cyperinuaAsclepiaa incarnataOnocloa sensibilisPhaiaris arundinaceaPycnanthemum spp.

INOIC. STAT—FACWOBL—FACWOBLFACWFACW—

STHAT.herbherbherbherbherbherbherbherbherb

Percent of dominant species that ar* OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100%Is the hydrophyte vegetation criterion met? X Yen ___ NoRational*: more than 50% hydrophyte vegetation

SOILS'

Series/phase: Subgroup:Is the soil on the hydric soils list?__________ ____(yes, no, undetermined)Is the soil a Histoaoi? no Hlstic epipedon present? noIs the soil: Mottled? Gleyed?Matrix color 5YR6/3 Mottle colors:Other hydric soil indfeatofs: saturated at surfaceIs the hydric soil criterion met? yeeRationale: saturated at surface

HYDROLOGY

Is the ground surface inundated?, no__________ __I Surface Water Depth: 0Is the soil saturated? ye*Depth to free-standing water In piVsoil probe hole: 12*List other field evidence of surface inundation or sol saturation:

Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? ye*Rational*: high ground-water table

JURISOKmONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE

Is the plant community a wetiand? ye*Rational* for jurisdiction decision: high ground-water table and dominance of hydrophyte vegetation.

1 Dominant plant specie* are listed by stratum starting with canopy and endingwith groundcover. The first specie* listed for each stratum it th* dominantsp*ciM for that stratum.

2 For additional information SM soil boring log*.

Page 16: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

APPENDIX C

SEDIMENT/SURFACE WATER INVESTIGATIONIMFORMAIIOi

AR30I050

Page 17: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

GRAIIf SIZE DATA

SR30I05I

Page 18: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

100

90

80

70

H 60u.

5 40

30

20

10

0

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTi « «: ; : ! : s i s s i « t 3 ? i

200

0

0

Test2

I 1 ! i

i i

i

s

j :

i 1

1 1

I ;

100 10.0

X-t-73.0.0

LL

V. GRAVEL0.0

i

\

:

^

i

|

!

sV*•o

!

|

k <

1

""•cw-1.0 0.1 0.01 0.301

GRAIN SIZE - mmy. SAND87.7

y. SILT '/. CLAY12.3

i

PI Das0.57

0600.38

Dse0.33

D380.241

0150.1017

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONa SILTY SAND, FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SEB-01

D*t»: 01x10x91QRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die0.0613

usesSM

Cc2.51

Cu6.2

AASHTO

RMMirks:SAS NO. : 5894C-01TAG NO.: 3-1123428

BOTTLE NO. : X0268023

Fiflur» No. /

,

Page 19: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o

o

190

90

30

70

(| 60tu£ 50UJ

g 400.

30

20

10

02(

test3

a

GRAIN SIZE

4 <£ J <! " " -

-

30

]

i:•

3]

[STRIBUTION

I S I Sat ————————————————ic; — .<

100 10.0

H+75.0.0

LL

•/. GRAVEL0.3

• •*

\v

TEST REPORT

I !

\ •

:

\i\IN

>:S ^i

*l ^**

—1•

•>>

1.0 0.1 0.01 (tffel6RAIN SIZE - mm ^M

'/. SAND53.6

y. SILT27.6

y. CLAY18.3

PI DdS0.26

D600.15

D500.10

D300.011

BIS0.0027

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONo SILTY SAND, FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITE0 Location: BL-SED-02

D*t»: 01x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die

usesSM

Cc Cu

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 3894C-02TA0 NO.: 3-1123447

BOTTLE NO.: X0268023

« H.* •Figur* No. A

flR30!053

Page 20: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

108

90

38

70

2 60ut

UJ

S40

30

20

10

0

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT<f

; ; ; ? : $ 2 s s =_ s 23 II

200

O

O

Test4

I • ! i •

|

i

>5

i

\\|

':

!

i

li

|

S >-0N.,•2.**r100 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.00

GRAIN SIZE - mm

Ji+73.0.0

LL

•/. GRAVEL0.0

•/. SAND85.5

'4 SILT12.2

"4 CLAY2.3

PI DOS0.31

B*e &5e0. 23 0. 29

I>380.132

'BIS

0.0799

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION0 SILTY SAND, FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SED-03

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTTWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

DIQ0.0369

usesSM

Cc2.76

cu6.2

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 5894C-03TAG NO.: 3-1123440BOTTLE NO.: X0238023

Figure No. 3

!AR30l05i*

Page 21: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o

o

188

88

78

H 68u.

g58oS 48

38

28

18

82(

Test3

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTi

t * J C* ^ *"* "" •••- - - 7 s T f * • « * * 'S ^^.- ~ i - £ S 5 s ; S 22 = 2 4A

30

I

i

; '

i i

1 ' r

; i

i\S\I

K ..

180 10.0

K+73.8.8

LL

m/i GRAVEL26.1

C"

i

1

••»Ny

iA

V1

ii

sSa •*r

'•r SV

—,

•**,

W

•*o1.0 0.1 0.01 (tfftl

GRAIN SIZE - mm ^Jf

'/. SAND37.7

J4 SILT26.7

y. CLAY9.3

PI 295S.71

0600.43

&500.2S

0300.052

DIS0.0126

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONa SILTY SAND UxGRAVEL, FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SEB-04

Date: 01x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die0.8053

usesSH

Cc1.22

Cu38.4

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 5894C-04TA6 NO.: 3-1122638

BOTTLE NO.: X0268023

4 •Fiflure No. i*

AR30I055

Page 22: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o

o

188

98

38

78

ul 68Hu.£58UJog48

38

28

18

8>•

Test6

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTi i i f e ~ ~ ~ '; ; : z :| s s * 2 5 12 I!

!«38 180

X+75.8.8

LL

\;

S-s

1

k, - ,;

C t i

'

'« >:\

sS3s

1

'

1

*<iN >r «iJX,

•>3

18.8 1.8 0.1 8.81 8.881GRAIN SIZE - nun

•/. GRAVEL26.8

y. SAND34.7

•4 SILT29.0

'/. CLAY18.3

PI 3357.56

D6e 0590.36 0.21

D300.041

»159. 8892

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION0 SILTY SANS WxQRAVELt FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4284-33Project: BL SITE0 Location: BL-SED-04 <Dupiicat»>

Out*: 01x18x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die0. 004?

1

usesSM

Cc0.99

Cu76.7

AASHTO

R***rk*:SAS NO. : 5894C-84TA6 NO.: 3-1122630BOTTLE NO.: X0268023

Figure No. <J

•i

Page 23: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

0

o

100

99

30

70

§ 60u.£50g

30

20

10

02(

T»st4

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

i i <! Jx ss . i • i sI I 1 !

90

| :

I

100

K+75.0.0

LL

•j

! i

I i i

!• : I

i •••>••-°\

\| :

• R

10.0

GRAVEL4.5

PI.

Vik;

-

;

\

TEST REPORT

k»^ n

>

i

:* « *, Ck* ii ; ta •c

\

•»

H

•**o1.0 0.1 0.01 tffte

GRAIN SIZE - mm WM'/. SAND78.6

'4 SILT11.4

'/. CLAY5.5

0351.38

0600.90

0580.70

0330.330

BIS0.0489

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONO SILTY SAND MxA LITTLE GRAVEL, FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4294-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SEB-03

1 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTTWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die0.0138

uses.SM

Cc8.81

-

1

Cu65.3

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 5894C-05TAG NO.: 3-1121005BOTTLE NO.: X0268Q23

Fi3ur» No. 6 ^^

AR30/Q57

Page 24: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

0

o

100

90

30

70

§ 60u_t- 50LU

S 40O.

30

20

10

0

T«»t5

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

; ; : ! : i ij s s s 13 !!

.00

i i I :

* -— .:

; i

i j

i !

• i

"NV —

V

i--•

Sy.S3

'».- *•»E •

N5

100 19.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.00GRAIN SIZE - mm

H+73-0.0

LL.

•/. GRAVEL0.6

tt SAND64.8

X SILT25.3

'/. CLAY9.3

|

1

PI 0350.33

o&a °500.19 0. IS

&3d0.059

DIS0.0097

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION0 SILTY SAND, FINE 3RAINED

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SED-06

D»t»: 01x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die0.0057

usesSM

Cc3.33

cu33.0

AASHTO

SAS HO.: 3894C-06TA6 NO.: 3-1121011BOTTLE NO.: X0268023

Fisur* No. 7

SR30I058

Page 25: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o

o

100

90

30

70

§ 60i— <U.

I508] 400.

30

20

10

02<

T«st6

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONi

; ; H : S 2 S s I s f I

.

90

| i : ;

! • '!

i '

•\\

TEST REPORT

1 1

100 10.0 1.0GRAIN SIZE - i

K+75-0.0

LL

V. GRAVEL0.0•

!

•»<\$• a* t"5 •iIN><;

0.1 0.01 glftjnm 'HB

'/. SAND81.2

% SILT15.3

% CLAY3.5

PI 0350.34

Q^A OKA™O«w "OlB

0.24 0.20D30

0.140&15

0.0513

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONo SILTY SAND. FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SED-07

D*t»: 01x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die0.0240

usesStl

Cc3.43

I1

cu9.9

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 5894C-07TA8 NO.: 3-1121017BOTTLE NO.: X0268023

Figur* No. S

AR301059

Page 26: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o

o

100

90

30

70

S 60u_£ 50UJ

£ 40

30

28

10

0ft4

Test7

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

- - J ** **: « i : ]5_s s a 5 5 11

!00

:

< s'•-\

':

11

100 10.0

X+75-0.0

LL

'/. GRAVEL12.7

\.•"

^X

TEST REPORT1

i !

V--.sSa,*0i•**r*.-

1.8 0.1 0.01 0.00GRAIN SIZE - mm

X SAND77.8

•/. SILT X CLAY10.3

.1

PI Das4.37

0681.97

Bsa1.28

B3a8.316

1

BIS8.1148

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONO SAND WXSILT * MxA LITTLE GRAVEL* F-M GRAINED

Project No. : 4264-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SEB-09

Date: 01x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Di09.9716

usesSP-SM

Cc9.71

Cu27.5

AASHTO

Remark*:SAS NO.: 5894C-09TAG NO.: 3-1121035BOTTLE NO. : 0144813

Figure No. ?

5R30I060

Page 27: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

100

90

30

70

H 60u.^50LU

£ 400.

30

20

10

0

e

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

& tl 4 ' - -; : z : s_ 2 s s ; s 22

200

O

o

Test3

: |

100

K+73.0.0

LL

• .

\

»^^S\

1

S J n

;

> k rS-A

TEST REPORT

I ! ^

V'*•

i

SSS<vA^3>.*S***;

w

l-*

10.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.J|GRAIN SIZE -mm •

GRAVEL24.1

PI

% SAND38.9

J4 SILT24.6

'4 CLAY12.4

DSS7.33

B60 °500.50 0.22

D380.039

BIS0.0076

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONo SILTV SAND MxGRAVEL, FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SED-10

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTTWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

°100.0032

usesSM

Cc0.98

t

*cu

134.9

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 3894C-10TA6 NO.: 3-1121041

BOTTLE NO.: 0144013

^ 1

Fi3ur» No. /O ^

SR30106I

Page 28: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

100

99

80

70

£ 60u_£ 50

LU 40CL.

30

20

10

0

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

- , 4 * < J * *: ; : i : f ? s s s i 5 11

200

O

0

Test9

! !

•• '•

rV

11

\\ ^ i

i i

•••*<SkS

TEST REPORT

! i

i., :>.•» Q.•*o*o-(,• :••i•c

1

ii

_ i _100 19. 0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001

GRAIN SIZE - mmX+75.0.0

LL

'4 GRAVEL55.3

7. SAND37.5

'/. SILT5.3

Y. CLAY1.9

I

PI °8513.49

D60 0597. 46 5. 66

0301.671

DIS0.1919

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONO GRAVEL WxSILT AND SAND

Project No.: 4204-03Project: BL SITE0 Location: BL-SED-11

D*t»: 01x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Dia0. 1268

usesGP-GM

1

Ce2.95

Cu58.9

AASHTO

1

SAS NO.: 5894C-11TAG NO.: 3-1121046BOTTLE NO.: X9238Q23

Figure No. //

AR30I062

Page 29: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

O

O

188

98

38

78

uj 60u_

|40

38

20

10

02(

T«st10

c

GRAIN

e d $ d

30

K+70.

1

100

'5.0

LL

;

SI2d £

Mr

! '. i

i 1 •

ZE[>• -

• DISTRIBUTION

* * 2 2 2

\

1

i

:•••"«:

I

TEST REPORT

! ! i

fete

Us'., i

\it^

\su. 1-s i« ^"V

~\

^

10.0 1.0 0.1 0.01GRAIN SIZE - mm

'/. GRAVEL20.5

PI

y. SAND44.2

K SILT23.8

F

N>m'/i CLAY11.5

Das5.24

D60 Ds03.30 2.42

D300.035

BIS0.8O72

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONO SILTY SAND WX6RAVEL, MEDIUM GRAINED

i Project No.: 4204-03P«»o4«ct: BL SITEO Location: BL-SED-13

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTTWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

DIQ0. 0041

usesSM

Cc0.09

i1

cu312.3

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 5894C-13TAG NO.: 3-1121058BOTTLE NO.: 0144813

Figur* No. t2*

AR30I063

Page 30: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

108

90

30

70

S 60I—.u_t— 50

ffi 40o.30

20

10

0

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

• ; i 1 : £ 2 s s = s * i

200

0

O

Test11

\!\

i • :

; 1

v-1'^

!

i

*J ^

100 10.0

Ji+73-0.0

LL

'/. GRAVEL49.3

•«»*c^

!

——————— - ——————————— ______TEST REPORT

? i

<,

i

*<S

'"r-v. «*«c•**^ ,1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001

GRAIN SIZE - mm•/. SAND29.0

X SILT16.3

y. CLAY3.4

i

PI «8511.48

0(686.17

&584.62

D380.302

BIS8. 0266

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONO SI LTV GRAVEL W/SAND

Project No.: 4284-83Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SEB-13

Date: 01/10/91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die0. 0898

usesGM

Cc1.51

Ca631.0

AASNTO

Remarks:SAS NO.: 5894C-13TA8 NO.: 3-1121070BOTTLE NO.: 0144013

Figure No. A3

Page 31: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o

o

188

90

80

70

uj 60»nu.H- 58UJog 40Q_

38

28

18

82«

t»st12

c•4

GRAIN SIZE* * ? < * : : i : s s s

38 188

K+73-0.8

LL

i

DISTRIBUTION

i = S I S***^

k>,'\

;

V

TEST REPORT

i ! A

\

\

i

^> *c

— • — .

=4

• - —

1 1Ua

" HP

T

r

\

18.0 1.8 8.1 8.81 8flBGRAIN SIZE - mm ^&

'/. GRAVEL1.8

PI

X SAND73.5

'/. SILT12.9

X CLAY11.8

Das8.62

D60 Dse0.29 0.23

&388.121

Dl50.0183

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONo SILTY SAND, PINE GRAINED

! Project No.: 4284-03Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SEB-16

D*t»: 91x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

Die8.8831

usesSM

Cc16.39

Cu92.4

AASHTO

R»m»rks:SAS NO.: 3894C-16TA8 NO.: 3-1121876BOTTLE NO.: 8144813

•Figur* No. (4*

5R30I065

Page 32: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o

o

108

90

80

79

u.£ 50LUCJg 40a.

30

20

10

0,*

Test13

:c

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

* * * * * * * *; ; ; r : s s s s | s 21

30 100

*+75.0.0

LL

<

10.0

/i GRAVEL0.0

PI

T

H

TEST REPORT

M Ci *«0*->>•:•«•c •*•—— 0

1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001GRAIN SIZE - mm

'/. SAND31.2

"4 SILT13.2

'/. CLAY5.6

0850.25

0680.18

0580.16

0380.115

0130.0367

MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONO SILTV SAND* FINE GRAINED

Project No.: 4284-83Project: BL SITEO Location: BL-SED-17

D*t»: 01x10x91GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION

oia0.0110

usesSM

Q:6.60

Cu16.6

AASHTO

SAS NO.: 5894C-17TAQ NO. : 3-1121030

BOTTLE NO.: X0268023

Figur« NO. AS

SR30I066

Page 33: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

SAMPLE RESULT^

3R30I067

Page 34: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES

CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):

U = Not detected. The associated number indicates approximatesample concentration necessary to be detected.

i

(NO CODE) = Confirmed identification.', \

B = Not detected substantially above the level reported inlaboratory or field blanks.

R = ' Unreliable result. Analyte may or may not be present in thesample. Supporting data necessary to confirm result.

' I

N * Tentative identification. Consider present. Special methodsmay be needed to confirm its present or absence in futuresampling efforts.

i

CODES RELATED TO QUANTITATION j(can be used for both positive results and sample quantltatton limits):

J * Analyte present. Reported value may not be accurate orprecise.

K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actualvalue is expected to be lower.

L = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actualvalue 1s expected to be higher.

UJ * Not detected, quantltatlon may be inaccurate or imprecise.UL * Not detected, quantltatlon limit Is probably higher.•

OTHER CODES

Q • No analytical result. i0 * Compound Identified in an analysis at a secondary dilution

factor.X = Additional flags defined separately.

/IR3QI068

Page 35: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

SURFACE WATER SAMPLES

/5R30I069

Page 36: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

cO

-a

O>,

r**» csjO m

Oa

?a» CJ

UJO

41

•§

SCOCM

O CM

uiu

3333333333333.33,3333333333333333333oooooooooooooooooooooaooooooaooooocsaooocioooocjaooaoooooooooaaaoooaaoo

ggggggggggggg.8gggSSSSgSSg3gggggS§S

333333333333 333333333333333

3333333333333333333333333333333 33

8S3SS388SS333§§§§§§§338S3S33S£3333i^vnu^uiu^u^w^oooouiwn^Qvnu^uiOhnou^w^u^uiu^u^unuvu'iinesioo

333333333333 33 33333333333333333-333

3333333333333333333333333333333*^33§oooaoaoooooaooooooooooooooooooooaoaCTaoooeicsoocaacjooacioooooacaooooaooa

3333333333333333333333333333333 33

~ **•.c o> o< » s — • —M ti S a 3 •— •——

l&«««i^1i??l^r=i7f.Kllrl5i5lSliai

SR30I070

Page 37: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

cu

5

1333333333333333-33333333333 33-331

43

V

« ,5 J!

10 en— to cj

i2s/l (_)

u

0> a

hemi

3333333=933333333333333333333333

3333333333333333333333330S333333333ggo§§ggggoo§o§g§oo§o§§o§gooig§iggg

33333333333 = 33333133333333333333-333

§§§33§§§3333§3§§§§3§§§§§§§i§§§§SS§

338333383333§333338333§i§§§§§S§§SS

i- 1_j _i 3-a ~-m> -^ P I ~ s I>-» —i — e »- a --» M o. >-~. 9 3 Ol .C O .J —•

at at tt ^ ^ & O *«• 3 •ta* "* u - ^ .s — »3-8_j— • _iffS— > --• u'- ~*< o ** c S c 3 —~- c j: •«, i. g>->- -~ gi %£ •«. "O a u

U^oSBSi-J-J'' «-~O»JIO3O>jiO-l-'O>— C O3O 3

TTT3J C u u m S3xSS — ;r5j!*?'«l'oo'o 2H5.S<VICM«r<OUCO<BOU

AR30I07I

Page 38: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

£

35

« (Ora s §§§!§§

flR30|072

Page 39: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

J

o _

T3 J '•2=5o 03 8

u14_O

l/l U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O_ _ _ _ 01 — —. _ ^n_. — _, _ _ _. o-i —• CM o-i kr> — — — — — oion— — — — — —• — _ j-i _

3333333333333333333333333333333333333

aooooooQoooaooo'o'o'ooooooo'oo'o'o'oi

3333333333333333333333333333333333333

ooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

333333333333333333333333333 = 333333333

aiooooooo'o'oo'aoooocio'ooooQoooooooooooooo— «««vr>-« «^vn«-«« — — —•vo — eMwnwn.- — — — _ tn ui -« — — _ — __ — m-S

3313=33333333333333333333333 = 333333333

72.2 8S§§888§S8§S§§o§§§§§§§3;§§i88888§88§§8-- — ~ o oooooaoooooaooooaoaooaaoooooooooo'ooa

•>*M4v«H*tf)«*«Miii«U^*l>*'»*»«<''****H*U')~*CNJhf)U1*^«**M~l*»*t^Ul«*«>*~i4-*">*vM_*»'<IUi>-*

3 Ul00 u

i

icsjvni^^^—«-^-^ — fcrttfi—*-^^^—* — — —•—«sn—•

333333333333333333333333333333333 = 3 = =888888888888888888888888888888a0gai0§aoooooooooooooaooaaooaooooooooooaooao

333333333333333333333333333333333 = 3 = =

§§S§S8S§88S8888888888888888888888gggg353

<iir1- --- I 5 IP-1 5 111,

jiuuujrjruxS'bb'o.eil— So— o c i ^ l i - - S S — """SSi'^'i'au o a o u u o f b b b f£ f£ ._s — — Zameji£" < B * > t t t G >*— •— y u— — — — -S-S—w^^wca.caci^e — 5 i 4 Q. a. c 4 -2 -= = 'o a-<*. j: >- < —

.

««^«>.CM<VlCVICVI(MCM<MCyiCMCVI(M<VICV4nnVvV'

M C C C C C C C^CaOuuaSffiw

AR301073

Page 40: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

>.co»

5

V

35,<u "> iu —J2 •— «

«!535•gS<= §2*7a- i« oflu

y o

tft

oo •» j— «r ci a 43 UJ •—t/1 c_> -0

to fi

iSc/1 (J

eu

«r —— • *r1 O

rsoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooao

i a353

73B

=oooooooooooooooooooo

o o o a o c s o o o o o a o a a o a a o o o o ao o o a o o o o o o o o o a a Q-» — — — —.aiio—i — ~-.-5;i.S_!S —

ogaooooooaooooooooaaoooooaooaoooooaaaoooocioooooooocicjaoaoooooooSaooaoaaSaaQooooooCToooaoooooooooooacsdoaaoooooooao—^*^^^"^«i^^-^-^u)^^-^^ — —«—«ui^-^csjunu^«-*'-<.^.^-^ijitn-^^-**-«^-*^^-^-M — un'^

§ooaoooooaaooooaooaoaoooaooooaooooooaooocioooGiaooooooooooooooooaoaoooaooaooaaaaoaooaaoaoaaaoooaaoooodoooaciaciaoo— ^ <™« ^ u) ^ ^ f tn ^ * ^ ••* " - ui •—* c*u » i v/> w —M «•« . —« j fc/i — »•* « ^ M »« « .M 01 *—*

ggoggoggSoggggoggoggSSgggSggggggggggo

ooooooooooooQoaoooQooooooooooaooooQu'io_*«*~*_»i^)~*.-i.Mhrt~*—*-* —«-*«m—«cMuiun*-»^^-^^«-.4uiuii-<»^—••^»«ntv^M4<s.^«

§s§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§sss§§§§ss§is§s§^^isaidoaaciooaaaooaciaaooooaociaooaaciaasada

> i/> ~* Csj krt Ifl •

O 10 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -J§aoaaoooooaoooaoaaaaoooooooaoaaoaooaooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooaooaoooooociocaoaoaaoaoododcjoodoooooddoaaocaoooao.^.^^^.^^^^•^•^UlOTMM^W^^^M^fB^bn^NCWU^UI'^'.'^^V^V^tfltO'^'^^^^^V^M^^^M^V/lv^

3333333333333 33333333333 = 333333 = 3= = = 3

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§cieaodgdo'eiesotaoooaa'oeiaoaooooaooocioooooa'o

S SCI r gi W-T— _-.-._! _. 3 o u— $ ~ ~»

~ a.

p__ ~ JJJ.s

~ y u v v -S-5 ° o^~ cc^u 3 wa 3 °* "* "^ 13 _S 's» * ^ a* ~g- ._

Page 41: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o>,

!•» <M?3

to -•

m u

Ul I

?s3 W|

_e«

*«• ?— « o

3at

?3aa

IM ata cvi

u

I

3333333333a33333333333333333

oodooaoobbaooooooooddooooooo

3333333333333s33333333333333

ooodaoaioooooooaoooaooaaooooa

3333333333333333333333333333

gggggggggggggggggggggiggglggo d d d d d d o d d d d d d d d o d d d d d d o a o d a

3393333333333333333333333333

gggggggggggggggggggggggggg g1

333=333333333333333333333333

ggigggggggggggggggggigggigggo d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d o d d d d d o d o o o dS:

33333333333333333333333333333333333

§SS§S§§§§§SS§§SS§Si§§I§SI§i:

tfi

3333333333333s333333333333333333S333S3333S3333S33S3333S3ddaddddcicidddaiddddddddddddadd

-• e» w •>.»» _ _ _ _5 _| -J > K 7>|7f <<! -. -<i_- .^ - i-ls

« 3 — s - g ^ i - ^ w f m a i a ^«r»^ •^M4^9uai&9 a 9 *•» •«••««

lOlillrffiTiliIiHll

SR30I075

Page 42: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

> u

X

eu

ti^ C3

irt i

n\a, <t

U

1U

^

U

'•SI ^

a

,2

A VJ¥35! a

oooQoooooooooQOOaaoeiaeiocaoooo^ •• • ••• •• •• « * • *"• •» «• i/i » * ^

:

§S222aggogaooagoCTcjoooooooaooaocioaaooaaooocsooaoooooooaooooooooaooooooooQooooooaooooel

oaoaaoooooooaooooooaooaoooaooaooSoooooooooooooaooooSooooaoo'ooaooaooacaoaaoaoacioadoaoo

ooaoooooaoaoogooaooaooooaoaaoaaooooaaoooaaaoaoaooooaaaaaoo^ioocaoaoaoaoaoeidoaiaoeioaooaci

ooaaaooaaoa

333a333333333s33333333333333

333SSSSS33S3SSS33SSSSS33S3SSodcadooaiododdoodoaiodaoaidoaodca

33333333933333333333

s:

01— • 33 j«—

IllJ 1-?

076

Page 43: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

350) <"u ,_

Z o10o

a

O) U3 -M—< CNJ a aoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooi an O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O-* c ooooooddo'o'o'doodooo'ododoodo'dooooodoooo

oi-»»—• 01—— 3 Ol —1 3

3 •01—.—-—. «•».•». „ „ 01 •— 3 s- _i_j_i3 _I _J _J Ol Ol-* - ~ — _J _1 3 O U •—• Oj —* ^-* *x -v,•—-^-^^33_i_i--._i_j^-^ — cm £ _i 01010101 01 oi* '* ' . •^.,j«*^^,oioi ai.C'— +•» ^ - ^ 3 3 301 3 3 3 Ol Ol- O 1 O 1 3 3 D -C *J O •—• 0) Cl •——•—•e»—•^•^—>— 3 3 01 3 3—•-" — —•—• c -^ a. u £_!•——•— — 3— —«31 O O "* *—• 3 *••' " ' —1 —1 ^ ••" ~ *— 0) ^ >% «J -J '• —J " ^ —J ttl 01 (U »JN 0) 03 01 C C * (U *» 01 ^ ** "T3 ^ >> >» f Ol C * ^ ••*•. *•••* » "•». C C £ ^ **»

EC C C O O 01 0) C 3 3'io ""io~"""~""-- 0)""^gajr 01 I "~ ~~ —• 3 '""•-. o""" C I- C 3<~"W D i u u u ^ i a j i — — jsr-j;.— u J2 a) i i <-> e *— •— 01 » — o i o i « a i < o o i f l - — •—Oi Ja ja _£ £ a.^ j: O O * « O * > Q C ' — g_ecsii— aj^sso.e'— c^t-eu^u oS i. 2 2!c!]E S'xo'o 'a.al'Q.S'- c^— o c i^SS-^ e e — ~^ -w "_§•-_§•- a•S — — — 4J^^5.w.M.M c "§. 3 .^ £ S "c w T S 0.0. c £^£ £* e J3 JJ*-.- iE,< 'a

T-QOQuntOOQOOO'—>— 4J *J *J *J I +JQO1—•—'—•"-';<->4-''0<u£oOOOOO>!

I I I I I > I • V I I I I t I U U C QJB-<<:<:CDI

^30/077

Page 44: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

cus*

£

11

O

?29 UJ</> u

SCJ

iSt/» O

*jl J *•—t/i ej Q.

3 3 3 = 3 3 3 = = = = 3 3 3 3 3 => 3 3 =1 3 3 = :

cooooCTOoo — —.oaooooo

oooo — — o a o o o o o o - • ei a a a a* a

. H — ouiuimuouooo-^o^^ — —^ — oouioou^oaouiocidoooooca^^dooooocaoax-idociodc)

o o o o a — — . o o c a c s o a —

— —.—4Ouiaiu->LOwnoo—O—• — — — oouioou->ooooooooooo—•—<oooooooad — oooo

. J 00? a«3U r!! OOOOOOOOO — — O O O O O O O '

oooinoooooooou->oooouiLr>ootnou->tnin<ddddddddd — — d d d d d d d d d — d d d o d i

u

oootnoogesoooouiooooirtvoooioointoui-. — -.ouniniTiiotfioa — o — — — — c>oir)aouaoo>

» « . • > » 0 1O) Ol <-» 3 "a a -* —-" CT *"*<—• at *— iV *x. QJ «j 3 0) :14* OI«~"O^« ~» C»

Page 45: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

cu

2?-gi a IB3 uj —

ua ci7S

7S

7S

m a7S353

i O3 UJ

3 UJCO <J

ooooaoooo— . — aoooaaooa — oaaooo

333333333333333333333333333

— — — Ocnuiuomunoo — o— — — — ooinoouoooomooooooooo— — ooooooooo — ooaooo

333333333333333333333333333OOOt/^CSOOOOOOObrtOOOOU'imOOlOOU'lU'lu'lO

ooooooooo — — ooooooodo—i aooooo

333333333333333333333333 3ooomoooooooouiooooi^inootnounuscoo— — — OLOuommuioo — o — — — — oovooabno—<ouio'dooo'oooo — — o ooooo°oo~ oooooo

333333333333333333333333333

OOOOOO — — OOOOOOOOO — OOOOOO

3333333333333333=3333333333

OOOOO — — OOOOOOOOO — OO

333333333333333333333333333

OOOOOOOOO — — OOOOOOGOO — OOOOOQ

333333333333333333333333333ooovnooooooooinoooOLOuioouiountnu-io— — — owOwnuiLninoo—o — — — — aouiootnooouno'o'o'doo'oo'o — — ocidddciddo — o'cidddo

*-* _J _J —. O» - O>-J_J_J_1-J-J_I _1^»M - . Jj-J ^ S)^

"5i ™ti §" -2'3l , ,~' - i""*• _j —• •— QI a •—•__- -«. — 3 -. w 3 a.

OIO)O1-J<O-"CMC»JOO»« Ol"» — W> J C —— UJ k _ _ _ _.

" '** ^ mt-*~*~*^^~* (QtsfQauoojcaic..)^ wtJ'"Q UJ l--i Cfc^^>"'^'^" D^MSM"6

^3(3/079

Page 46: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

X

co

QJ

C

<-35!OJ

.5 -j </»

111u

u0

jD>1

"3To? to •*«*-* <N* 19

1 O VIa u eVI (J '"•

ia

-

1

33333333333333333333333

o4«>4«^ou)u)wiu)h/7ao*^o«ii^*^«^M>*oouioo^ooaooaooo— '—ooooaoaoo— -oo

O1 9 W Ot CT) Ol Ol 91 34 3 <^ '*" O ^ ^-~ -«,«-. 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 — .a«—<*. ~-^ X 3 _1 _J 9)

«— — oio<siMe\icgiMM— » c c c a » * > u u i — " oo i&i «^ i ti i i i \ e **- >^ »*» *••• £ ™ * u e £ jca"".£.2.2,2,2.S,2,2^:>33.£.£oux4(_' '

1

i

3333

O O O mO O O O,

— « Ol§3

_ ~ J-4 -» _C 5

^y«J2MM flo51 1 1

u a» S <i

^^30/080

Page 47: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

4-1c

4-1

C1

U 10) 1

35«««" c

tE""^15 J^

U 1•— 1

0UMa

CMr«. en

I? j£

to enO LO

on 3C

0in ena oni <3 cjon X

r«»•» CMO t/>1 •<

<si ac

"a?» «•"r*» en <o•— 0-1 O

coen CMo t/fS^

enCM CMOeg

tn- euo eni <53

«u

3 3 CO 3 3 33C03 CD CO 3 3 33 33COoooooooooaoooooooooooooo

c o e n « CM _ u-j _. cxj ^ rn en

*r -H" CM"

33 33 3333 CO CO 3 33 33CO

§§§sigg§g§§gs§giggiiiiis«r" — i CM"

33CQ33 33CD3 CO CO 3 3 33 33CBooooooaoooooaoooooaooooa

r-.cn^^ CM — « ui — • CM CM CM en-« U3 CM — i ^ T

en — * CM

33CQ33 3 3 CO 3 CO CO CO 3 33 3 3 COOOOOOOOOOOOOCJOOOIOOOOOOOO

toen en — • en ^r — * CM to *rCM co en aen —*

33C033 3 3 CO 3 CO CO CO 3 3 33 3 3 COoooocaoaoQaaaoooQQQOooaoQ

^ e n » > CM -*cna)CM r^. cp CM0} * en U3en -* CM

330333 3333CQCa CO 3 33 33CQooocaooooooooooouiescpaaaaocaCTOoaooaooaao- <omc\jooooooao^ en — > ~" — • — 03 CM CM o s ^ c o enen CM «r r

en -" CM

330333 3333 ca 33 33 3 3 CO

3§35§3§33S§S3§§S§§§§§3§3

V <-! CM

33 33 3333O3O3 CO 3 33 3 3 CO

tooocoaooaooaencao-iaaooaaaocn^ c3 ^ ^ ** cn c? tf) ^ en C3 ** ^ o ^ ^ to m p u o en en enf en «" r «" cn o en en 9 en

_i_j— -.-.». j — . .-x,— - .j _ij

-i ^ 3 O> 33 •••• 91 Ot 3 3 O) •«* O> Olvi^w^

• 3H~"« 1 " "jT •«»«-«*— oien^ in " " 5 S *"""* S 1 °*

<5<c3ol<3t3ucj(Sejij53S3l5Z<S<Sw>li?5iC

Page 48: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

J!

!£!(U CO _ "3**• tr ot" ."

-jg-0) ~ TJO *** -U

33333303333303303>«ts>c- ~

55!

•too en

O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O c n O O Q O O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOTO—.TOOaOCTlOO

3 3 CO 3 3 3 3 OJ 3 CO ffl OQ 3 3 =33 3 3 ffl

ooooQQooQoooooooooooooooooooooo«*otocnOLneMOOooooo'*r

330133 3333 CO CO 3 3 33 3 3 <noooooooooooooooooooooooo

01 CO P ••• !•/) J -~« CO " OJ

§§SSSSS2§S§§g§S5S"gSS§Sl;

3 33 3333 CO 33 33 33COaoaooaaoaaaoooaaooaaaaoo—.cs^-ooooooooocsioopgoooooooLnoocvj^r— 'tnotnr-roOOTroocioioowunornfnr-*c o c n o en — • to -~ r^» CM m

33 3333 00 0333 33 33O

3 3 03 3 3 331030000 OQ33 33 3303

— • a> en CM

33033 330O3 CO CO 3 33 33IOaooooaaoaoocpaou^oaoaaoooooaioooooenootooocMOoaoooom

O» OI-J -* W i* 1 *" *«V33^_*aei_i-*w*«•*«» O» s, •—• 3 **. "x» 3.«32I.*"'2I ff^i ix-i i—§

^301082

Page 49: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Cu

IC

0) "' CO __ TJ10 1 >.

.f«5 «- •—

oa

CO 4)Ol CSJ +4

!»5

3333 3CD33333 33

—I (V! <0

= §•= isrSJ-sii fc3*—1=5 ZM.H 55 |g S*8

AR30I083

Page 50: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

SEDIMENT SAMPLES

AR30I081*

Page 51: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

JS

i </)r1

(J -M >OJ 3OJ IO « IV) *•»

o 'o

.cuo

a o

Is

mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooa

UJ UJVI U

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo00000000000000000000000000. 00000000

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oo p o o

SSSSSS8SSS£SSSSSSS.3SSSSSS3S§S§§S§§

goggoogogggooggooogoggooooooooooo

a = S = 333«a353= = 333 = 3a333 = a3==33 = b33ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

»***»*»***_«**eljCMCw<M«**-4»*csj>-4»-4»*csj-*csj«~-*~4—*-*—4-*~«—*-*>-«csjc<u. •

333:3a3:3ae3333S3=}33=j:33:333333:3=333p = 38OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO C3OOOOOOOOOOOOO000000000000000000000000000000000

at *; --• o>fl 3 O) ^ ^ * ^ . "" t ^ Ol —:—X _ _ ~ .o> .<? jg> ?.<?>_ = —31 S S1 ^ v ~» "CT "S> -~ *~ at n *& a> e ;<— g •— . -^ •>. at 3 a oi 3 at "^ x c «J~0) -w U 3 3 3-2. "^ "~" ."" -^10^^ 3 OI jS-^Oii—— OI

i o j a > e a 3 3 ^ itf«)4^N4|gSj='^^ai 3 U 3 < A I I Q^-MO~ ~ ~ *~ o ^ ~ a i < w o u t ; j c e *"• - x - u o j ;

>,j:uu3ionjcu>>><j:^ >« w — *• *• fl — c c

AR30I085

Page 52: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

•S-44J N O

u

9> U 3333333333 33333333133333333333* tO *J oooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooaao_ _ -. oooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooaooUj UJ C(rt (J •—

_ 33333330C333333333333:—4 CJ

a8.

I UJi o

2 a.oSLU UJbn cj

2<oi ino oUJ UJVI O

§3UJ UJen u

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g gCT OT tJt o) o"> 01 9} A OT 9 cn <D o1) 01 OT o*> CTI 9 9 o 9 eft en CTJ 9 01 01 9 o> OT 01 01

333333K333333

000000000000000000000000000000000

33333330633333333333333333333333333goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

33333330:33533333333333333333333333gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

<wW«eVW*rWaOfld«GO^'^^aQ«r*r^co^'ao^>^W^'vVV'^^.^•*.»*.*.^e\jC\iCSJCVJ«-*M**C<g~**-««-*CNJ~4CM«^<-***««--4**«>*-

3333333K33^333333333333333333333^3

S8S8SS88SSS8888SSSS888S333SS888888G3OOC3OC3OOOOOodaOC3CDOOOOOOOOOOC3OaOOOO•wrt « «« « *> v ^ C>J OJ CSJ CSJ <•* «" ^ C%J ^ «~* •• CVJ " CM «<4 * ^ «~« <«4 »« « f * *- «>4 CNJ CJ

•-» o<— • Ol 01 ^ -»

-~ —— — • •>«•-. "w 301 ai oi oi ai 3 —i£^ i£ 3iS -3 « - «

" 101 — b» to a*-— a* a. a; —** » 3 4-* w u -^» o» C Cn 3 "O 9 ^ O C 9 •«-» Of Q. P» "^*____ -" « . - _ _ _ _ . ————— -. —————— Q ^^ Q S ,^ 0|

k 01 k— 01 3

2- 8 €8-J k — •- ^

*. 3 01— — ** ""O

"(_ — ,— »-—— g g i »»»^x p X — 5 C 5 k«<o!fi M «I»^O»^CV1^<'> O 4)'-

-^-^^**N*^e\icsj^3Sx 9) c o o O k k*— *—^—•— M^j;4^ >» «j *— *• 4- le-^ e c^ _I_T— « ' ' ' u«'ul-1-l'|o-e-c-c-e'*'""*JJ!*'«'ooo)u(t^^

flR30!086

Page 53: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Ic•w OBC 4-10) — I.2 "* !•5

C T3 *>— C 18

OJ

H) 3 S4_l rr"l jj

U

3333333333 = 33333.33333333333 3 3333333I vn O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oop 00000000000000000000000000000000000

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooor^^f*^r*»o^^'^'^O^^^^^r^^r^Of^OOO(^^>f^f**^^OOP^^*r-xr^f^ f » (••* r

CDO -* ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo000000000000000 00 000000 00 0000000000

§0000000000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooCMCWCJCWOCMCVjeSJOCMCSJCMCNJCMCMOCMkDOOC'aeSjesjCSJCXjOOCSICMCSJCSJCMmOslCSI*-*<-*~*-^(0»*»^~*(0*>«~*ff*»>*i—>w*tOw4CVJ(£tD»*w4«~4«4«*(0(0

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo o o ooooooooooooipoooooaooooooooooo'oo__.-,_o — —•—•o—• — —•—> — —'O — ooo-«—•—•—• — oo — —•—• — —•--—'--

10o o-o oUJ LUto u

a a

—— T KJi in uu a.3•o

O 00 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaaU

U

goooooooooooooooooooaoooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo^oo^^ooooo§'|||'||||||§§|§§||§||||§|||||'i||||§|

gggggggggggggggggggSgggggggggggggggo oooooooooooooodooooooodooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooajooooooooooocooogoaaoooooaeoaooooooo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

OCr> §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ 8-838888888888§SS8.S§§§§§§§gg§o§§gg'§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ 833883_.___0 — -> — 0-t — — -. — — O — tMOO — — — — — 00—. — — — — — — —

a mt •»o o ggg§§§gg§Sggg§g§ggg§gg§gggggggggg§§o o'ooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooo)Q)a)o>ocno)9)aoio>o)a)O)ooaiOoocoo>o>o)o>ooo)oiOTaio>a^a)O}

at.

Ol ^— . Ul 3 D>^ 3^ OIO> i< •— • 3 •

. oi a<>^•

en o ' «- «'ai ~ot m ^— ~ 5' L. —» ^ £' oi §> 01 oi—jw.qix X. . .3 Sfe— « ."? " - -13 3 \iTZ- °" °i"" - . - . _ - __.__.___ ^_^

J~-~-'~"o'o« - 3. < ' *™'iii£ i— ii^-— «^»><^^^!-~i^ — ai a o

Ol Ol W Ol ^ ** ^ ^ *••*.••» CTI O* O* ""3 01 o> 01 en— 01 01 i^ ao_ , ...^->^^.33^^cnw:i2* ^- • •*- cu i *c. qncnoi01 en ai ^ *>-• '*« *•*.. v> " *•*» at o> QJ j£ •*" ~» * * K 3 33cu 3 a 3 __ w w^ s» 5» r? 3r?r? «-^-l ^f 9 » *-=-2 _ -= CT-- — —

^aoou)coooooo^'M-M't-*^*4^ i 4-» a a t— •— '— *j *-» *j « <Q i- o o o o o^a«Y«^««» = Yi^£5i5i •--•--- * i £ .c .c .c « — -^ c ex: S N N (*4 NcMoaen^^^r^^^^-tfucjXxzaeenz^cBuuuxxz u V-M c c c c c• * » • • * » • . *•! i i i i i *i *i i i i i i l u o c t y a j v o j o j^•~****C^NC\lCWCSJC\JOgC*JCsjC>JC\JtNJOJCOC*)^^'^^^F^V<V<<^:flaCBCBfl3Qa

Page 54: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

i-l Vc *>

•a •—€»«- «l

u o

r>»OCMm

s-i ino aUJ UJI/I U

00p.S

IOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOI CO 60 00 60 60 60 CO 00 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO 60 CO 60 60 60 60 C 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

oSUJ UJt/i«j

omoS3S

SSSSS8SSSS88888888S88S888888SSSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOO^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^•^^^i^^O^^-^^^^^

ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg§§sg§iggg'sgiggggggg§§igg§gggg

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

3 33 33 3 3 33 33 333=33 3333 3 333 33 33

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

333333333333333333333333333333

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

ggggggggg'ggggggsgggggggggggggg33033333333333333333333333

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

§§§i§i§i§i§§§ii§§§ii§iilii§ii§O*CM cvicjevloj cMCsIcjcvrtvrcvrpaixIcJcsTtvrpa (Nlca cJo"cg CM {MOjcJfJcj

333333393333333333333333333333

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

OOOOOOC3OeOOOOOOOO<3e9OOOOOOOOOOO

~- -3 "5J 5 <-5e» c 3 "•"-«. CAM* e» '3*-' ? — o»

- s-e - at o»- -o<.£ Be » VJZi-«i^»a>3'-« 3 « atC « •<- <»3«-> • -w >••

» i . • .•B^ * o>^ Ji-i e «f • m<* 3 x*<m^e a.••- o c a a.a«c «.c f c 3.a.a uy . t fu u «> »-•»— •— • u ** j: « '•9 0oecM«ii-T>*-5 g ,iii5-£ S ,1111-- §74i . J §5 8 S S-S. 5 SSSSS-cT 1 S ^ .2 &•* e i S §5« fe fe S S S S S-iSSS 25 § 1

HR30I088

Page 55: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

4-> <UC •*-•gj •— iE <^> '•5 iu — a)</!•»-'-•*w •—c -o *j- g j•a-'S4^ N I(J 4_l -oj 3 e*J CO V

s t

oio

an o>-> <a *•i >r 10o a «LU UJ C00 (J —

— • CM1 U30 a

o aUJ UJ00 U

1 urto aUJ UJ00 U

— to1 (flo oUJ LUis> (J

O LO1 LT)

§0000000000000000000000000000000000O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood'ddd

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

|§||||§||§SS§|S|'S|§|S§§§|'||gggggggg

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooa> a oi r- o

OOOOOOOOOOGOOeOOQOOOQOOpOOOOOOOOOOOS'dddoddddddodddooododdoddo'ddddddoodooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooTr*r*TTro^r*rTrO<T*-^r*r*r'ro«rooOTr«r'<r*r-<roo<TTrT7^r7-<i-<Tp**^^^cor^p*»f»*LQr^r^f>»rN»rvr^cOP*u'}tOO3Pv^f^^^too3r«»^p*.r*ri»pxr^r^

gggggggggggggggggggggggggOOOgOggooo

gdddoddooodododdododopdooooooooooooooaoooooOOOoooooooQOOooooooooaoooao** i—(•^•*0>*-*"**i>*cn«*<B*«*»B*~*"*o)*Mfn0)cn>"4"«a4«*"*cnc7)*<i*<i*« .-«.-* - .-»-*'=> = = =====3=>=> = =) = = =1=1 = =1=I = =>= = = = = = = = =D=1 = = =

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooQo., - ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo— -> ffifnpopOfOroroMroi^pnfOf^npne^ficOfonornroe^cociPOfOPomfnncnnfnro.c i

§0000000000000000000000000000000000O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O a O O C l O O O O O O O O O O O O O

oQOQOOQooQooooooodoooooooooooooaooQooooooooooooooooooQOooooQoooQoooooP

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggdddeicidddddcjdo'cjddpcicigcipdcjcicjcjcicidddoodo1) 9 ot O) o 0i 0) n o 0) A 0) ft 0) 0) CD 0) o o o 0) 0) cn 0) 01 o o 0) 0> en o ••* co o PO

en• -~ oi-•n«-» en 3t CT> 01.— .— ».— . 5

- - — «o> SB 01^ 33 o i- »^ ai—— CV XrtSdi--^^*^^* at sj{--£ ' ^ ???

01333 OIOt^».OIOI3 "^ 3 —«•—^ 0) —• J± •!-» O Ot 01 *.*— —* O»-—.*-•*—*—C »«^>—••— •— 3 3 Ol 3 3 •— O>^ Ol OI-~ C Ql^^tl C •— Ol Ol—• Ol 3 Ol

1— ooo^'™O'™a**-wj:c^ci«-ou-^ » >\ — — -~ - — — - — — — --cuut.c.euxoooa.aiaai'— eo— ocji — >, o e — £3ucua.i-S— ce— ou<u—'.cajo—o

£ c -w i 7 a as. e Ji J! £* cl S a>^ J= C. o g •- §. p p o T ~ ~•ia5aui<o55csQC)'2 — 5£ii:?iS i —-2 £ i « «?u o o o o a• i i i • •-* i i > i.c.jza)a) ••-•«-> — i uj;£^co>-^-wccj:i»4'>4ii4>^Nc\icMfn<rv«««rv«<ouuzzzZ(nzucnuuuXzz u i> •" c c c c c• • • • • • • • • • • i i i i i i * i • i i i i i i i o u c a t u a i a i a j

AR30I089

Page 56: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

oUJ UJ(/) U

13Jl

7S*O 0 Wtn o -

o!§

a aUJ UJen u

_-* COI tnQ Q

I

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo000000000000000000000000000000

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g gggg'gggggggggggggggggogggogg'goo

§00000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo000000000000000000000000000000

S88883888888888888 888888888888

§00000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooofOQooQOOoooooaoooooo'oooOQOoooo

O1 CT 91 91 ^ ^ CH O) O 9) O1 CT O) O) 9 O) 91 91 O) 9) Ol O 0) CH O) O) 9) 9) 9)

0) •— I!««i3E.SC "5 4-1

IN? 2i §§88§888888888§8§§§§§§§§8888882=| as 8§§§§si§§§i§ooo§o§oSo§oiioio§:O (U

VI *•» I

foroeneneOfO^incncnrocnfnenrnenrofncnfnenfnenroMfncnencni

§0090000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

g'goggooggggggoggoggggggooogggg

><

ggOOSgoggggggggOOOOOOOgggggOgO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooO9>entneno>9i9i9i9iaa9i9i9i9)9)9icna)aio)9ioio9ir^9i9i9ioen

«•» Ol ^ Ol

— " "5 5— "oi'31» 2 i1 ^5 3i£~3ia£ —» "** —»-*^ Ol 3 *••. Ol *-^^ O) Ol Ot Ol 3 ^^ Ol Q] 3 U O3 *••» ^ *« ^ Ol Ol £ ^ U -* Ol 3 4J 18—— Ol Ol Olii V^OIVOIO) C ^ J±kt|r-<-~ 33i> ii ~— •*. 3 •— c e —a) ^ 4-> 01 •— «)01 « ———c --j 01 01— -o •«. a) §c 01 ujS'-.H

" W£ ** V «••» Ol 3 -" 3 n Ol U «5 •*- *~* 3 x g 4-1 X 4-1Ol1** « t) W O Ol 3 —— 91 —— U *J 3 >. — g —— Ol—— Ol —» V Q. JS

l« lOflU-^"" «»^ U 0) 0) " •'5 O.*-i£-»'-'>» X~U»-.• •* T2T T -c 21 « •" 2"^ 5 Z 5- S "O X P >>"i 5> 9 21 2 2i S-T

.01—x •«•— — -C 01 « 4J oi-~ c — a. a> ~a : o >>•»» o> o 01 Q x e.«~3 4^oiaq4->34^>930i«-ooc - - ^ u e o i s e s J£j=a>i— •— j: ii £ Jf c —• fl >— »— ii IM «~- a u 01 a. u a— u—-~—.4J4J m xo a.- 4J 4J « —9 ~>.C4->u.ci3i.c— -C 01 01 v v — «•o-cuai.e.c~c*j.ea)O!aj3>,4->r'>~ca. w a v ^ ^ o o a f•<- o e 3 o. &f <o£4-*c3A^udj - i-*-djcac^.>^uuL.'^u u o — •— — -i.4j.caj—oooaeviai — • g e « u u o i o i o o o > .< — »4 >t >| <• 3 j: CL£ U U U U - C - o S o ) F M O l - 3 3 — •-•— f

« C 0) 4-> 4-1 ™«- O.-— 4J 0) O O O O —" 5 I in •— C— £———-£^-C*Ju ojcaejoo^xcc:'11"^*^^ ^ u o o « 9 V J Z 4 ^ ucjouj— — £ v Ji 5 H M >,j= fl «^iij: o o w "JJso c— u Y Y i To >i> MI i e c £ 4 - > u u u u u u e ^ i 4 J 4 J 4 ^ o i o ' 9 o e c g c j < \ t e w3 M X > > e e v V 4 - > 3 i a o i e < a i a > a u & ' — — fU4^cea————c 4-1 i- i i i i i l ) 6 3 3 x x x x - o o z z a . 4 - i c i u V " - w w i o i aU U 3£.^-^-^-^-*--^r— »— ai fl» q. u g; i i IQ-M* 01 £ £ >* -~ -~ — —dSc»5fflcjoaoooou.u.x.CS2 — — zzzzo.a.a.a..a.a.a.a

5R30I090

Page 57: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

UJ UJeu

<-> V Ie ** i

•a —i «>41 41

4) IS O»j aa •—41 «>

u o i•»- iI

UJ UJI/I CJ

8

oS

oS

999999933999999999999999333

888888888888888888888888888§•

oaUJ UJvi u

CMO OloSUJ UJ

UI*.o

b'moS

uju

999993333333333339399333339

888888888888888888888888888ooomooooooaoinooooinmooinoirttnino

^ii^^^^Hi^mfn ^H«n*^ »^

gggsggggggggggggggsggggggsg^4<M -H O> 01 9 9 9 <7> O> •< .*..».•«.* 919

9^9939999999939339999399339

888888838888888888888888888

999933999333399339339999933

888888888888888888888888888

333333393333993939339933399

888888888888888888888888888<M CM M CM ru in in Nin CM CM

993933993993399399399399999

gggsssssgssssssssssggssgggg

< -^§* T?

222aaaa-s s *^«»i i i i i i i c'*-*.'*. — -— u e JE uzx J=§ c S fe fe & § fe ST-Ss-S c c-g-g ^^Vl^^V

Page 58: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

>,4

c

<*. -ac -a c_a; aj

*•• N "Do -*-»•—a) 3 u4J CO ——

es a) t$£ Vw 4-t cu

oooinaooooooouioooomuiooinounLnmc?o — ooooddooo—< — oodoooood — dddddd

333333333333333333333333333g § g g g g g g g g § g g g g g g g g § g g g g g g gooounoooooooouioooouiunoouiowiwiu-jo

333333333333333333333333333g g g g g g g g S g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g~ — —idodooooo — o—' — —>—'Ooodoooooo

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oo^idooodddoCTidoodaicnodaiocrioiCTidGO 03 co Q en en en en 01 o o co co co co ao 03 oo oo en 3 to en oo co co en*^>^^^ eocococococdco^^ VM^^OM-M coco co ao

g O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

on

15

I

t O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O;_—.coddddddo—<d — —• — — uDtodduJousiousd

g g g § § § g g g g g g § g g g § § g g § g § g g g g

encnencnumini/ineaeacnencncncncncneninacninencncnvn_ — cncncncncncnoi— __««_ enen en en

en enii en en

en en "a> 3 "o»—— 3 —— 3 *C —— *C

sssssss s€T €~7s ^ ^^. . .*••. * « » a E n t > 3 & Dicnj9'*^*eR>**uj — CSJCMCO^-O n__J>2 = — ill i- a = "3 en 3 _, --«c\jcn^r^-uita5 -—a o^— — us— •— •— "— cn3^^ t i i i i t i c »*• *• >^ *~ ^ *~a t - u u i _ i - u u — .-S— £^

eae t c a i i ii i i— — — — •— — — w w w — — fl'ooa.^nji'O^'O. . . u u u o o c j y u ^ o o o i - t . j - i w J i i o X J i i O - i - ' B B•«••»•» -a S 5 5 5 5 5 S «j -8 -3 -« T3 -a a. a.t: xa.a.-w>— I f- - ••— t - U U l - U i - u . — C C C C C 4 J I U W O — — 4) » 8 1•«'v^><<<<<c<««ou>ijjujuuj±3::ci-> a «j J5 -8 3> at

Page 59: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

cu

•M <U*

a

o vnA3

r>. *r w1 (/) UO <C —uu tJ —to JE o.

n3i

i

_, 3 _, ^— J "3 C3 _J 3 _1 3 3 CO 3 —>

o^rcvjr^oouDrntnro— .0 — oinof^co— .oroommOT C»J O CSICVJtOCNJ. CT> P O - t Oco m LO m — « •-«•» 00 — '

3O 3 -> — 1 = _J3_J 33CO3 1

en o o -* co — «m ^ to CM

3 - 1 - 3 3 - J 3 _ l 3 3 ( H 3 - 3oooouiooooooooooonooi— oouiot/}mocooo-^-^o^^)O^>^^

di *^CM cn ^ — » — o«-*^bpn ojr^ v en—« in <r ^ CM mca~ m <a r*

CM

3 3 -I "33 _ l 3 _ J 3 3 0 3 3 - 3

co — *CO

3 3 - 1 - 3 3 _ l 3 _ J 3 3 C C ! 3OOO^OOO^lOOOOOr-OOOOOOOOOOO^^>ococsjo*^^(0mocnoo-7

o^rmo)OOin^om^HOoooocg^^«<oroeg in f ^ * * ocNjo)kn*-«ro to» n in co o CMso" en" •— -«"

3m ooo wi </)a <c

Orou3i-»oocntnr^ui—.OTOOOOJO — oinomcoen in o OCMCMP* in CM enCM rn ao —* m -^

3 3 - J - 3 3 _ l 3 _ ) 3 3 C O = - 3oooorsjoaaooooooicoaoinoinoocoin^cnc\(O^4^cncooi^.ao«^cooro^cMcoo)tn

co —

_ l ^3 _ l - ^ 3 _ ) 3 _ l 3 3 3 - 31 i i in ooaoooooooooaoo^oooooooo)g i £3«c o«^cMOCM«^OP^-^encooiooocMi->«ocM*^o«<^cnacj

en CM CM -* r*»CM «

3 CO 3 _J -33 -3 _J 3 _1 33CO3 -3O *i w? ooooio — oooooaoooooous—.omoio<; omcM^^CMO^vin»*ocnoo<-*inc3co^cn^oi

en CM en « M O C D r - « in CM in

^ en -^

—• x: *i » "3 i— — 01 *< 01— .* 2 — — " — — ~ --•• - —-— — --•------— - & i sZ t »s2 J2 » 0>-~

""""* ff ' 'i**' "mi.i.S"

flR'301093

Page 60: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

aJ 3 --^1CO 0}

-C m

O O

1 iu4.o

en <o « 333333 3=3333_i3co1 t/3 <O

in ~*— «I c/3a <:

a ust vi

ginini in

i

6ooootao~*c*JO

3§Q I

LO <

m c\j o -* — CNJ o ~* en a ~* ~* c»j coeu ^ co r-«» P*. <sio» m csj

3 3 = = -33 -J 3 3 3 3 3 ~3

en ~* og. -M — tn m ^r n coCM O r-*. .

3 3 - J T 3 — i S - J ^ S S ' - a_ ooooooooooooooootoooounor^oo

o i^ ui n ••< o PVJ ^ en ^^ m en ^

V esj eu V

303 3 -I "33 _l 3 _l 33033 -3qj - VI ———« ID

o*-(r^co^rc\io^^OCMvoinao«^knoo^r^in«co

ro en rn o*«4^vcu 01 <si u?O) *f PO * ^ ^

_l 3 _l 3 3 3cooo oenacooouncomr».r«.a

f*. — — oocnin— .CMOOooo^-cn — otsio —OOooo^-cn — otsio — aoa 1^1 en i-» — i co — U3

_1 3 -33 _1 3 _l =3 CO = -3OOOOCOCMOOOOOOOOO—'OaooooenooO O) 33 U) CO 7M O P T O 4M C3 O O O •* CO O O) l^) O T m C3e>in*oc3oddo)o)-^<^dcoodc3cO(o'd^a)du)Qtn csii*^ o en o co — en ui cw o ao

— 2! nen ~

lil|{lllfi!5fffJH|l||3i*i&rfi77i"niS2^Jii"iiic a— i'-SS-—«t.-o -s~ M r • — - — • - ----- -

Page 61: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

38301095

Page 62: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

!||R301096

Page 63: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTj

An ecological investigation was performed along the streams, and theassociated riparian areas, in the vicinity of the Butz Landfill to evaluatepotential environmental impacts related to the site. In addition, a riparianwalk-through evaluation was performed in the landfill in order to identify anygross impacts to the riparian ecology.

' i•* !

Nine (9) sample stations were designated for the stream evaluation, includingone reference station. Each sample station is described below, then comparedto the reference station. A summary of the observed riparian vegetation,collected benthic macroinvertebrates, and stream community evaluations arefound on Table 4-6, Table 4-7, and Table 4-8, respectively.Photodocumentation for all sampling stations is found in Appendix D-6.Measurements of all sampling locations are given on the stream data sheets(Appendix D-2).

Riparian vegetation and animal signs were recorded during the walk-throughevaluation of the landfill and adjacent woodlands. Supplemental data was usedfrom the information gained from the wetland identification transects thattraversed the site. j

STATION ECOL-15 (REFERENCE)i

i

Sample station ECOL-15 was located on the property of Leroy Rinker on RinkersRoad. The area surrounding the station consisted of a maintained residence,small sections of field, and woodland.

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.07 m3/3- Tne streamconsisted of approximately 60% riffle, 30% run, and 10% pool. Cobble was thedominant inorganic substrate, and detritus was the dominant organic substrate.Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. Detritus decomposition isoften indicative of a population of microorganisms present in an unimpaired

aR30i097

Page 64: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

stream. The stream had an approximately 20% canopy cover. A more detailedstream description can be found on the Stream Sampling Data Sheets.

Riparian Vegetation - Herbs observed on the north bank at ECOL-15 consisted ofday-lily, goldenrods, brambles, and jewelweed. Because the site visitoccurred during the winter season, identification of plants to the specieslevel was generally not possible. Alder was the only shrub observed, andpoison ivy was the only woody vine. Green ash and grey birch were saplingrepresentatives observed. Trees included norway spruce, hickory species,green ash, black walnut, and red maple. The norway spruce were planted, andwere closer to the stream than any other tree species.

The south bank was primarily a maintained lawn.

Riparian Wildlife - Black-capped chickadees and squirrels were observed atECOL-15. Turkey tracks were also observed.

Aouatic Vegetation - Macrophytes at ECOL-15 were abundant. No filamentousalgae, slime or periphyton were observed.

Aguatic Community - Large numbers of organisms were collected at the samplestation, and all other stations, therefore, one quarter of each sample wassubsampled using a random sampling method. The subsample corresponds to afield sample area approximately one (1) to one and one half (1.5) square feet.The riffle/run sample at the reference station had a diversity of seventeen(17) taxa, ten (10) of which were representative of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera,and Trichoptera (EPT) taxa. EPT organisms constituted 70% of the total numberof organisms identified. Filterers/collectors constituted 58% of the totalnumber of organisms, while scrapers constituted approximately 5% of theorganisms. Chlronomids made up 16% of the organisms identified. Noamphibians or fish were observed.

The Coarse Particulate Organic Material (CPOM) sample had a diversity ofseventeen (17) taxa, ten (10) of which were representative of EPT taxa. EPTorganisms constituted 67% of the total population identified. Shreddersconstituted 22% of the total CPOM population identified. Chironomids

AR30I098

Page 65: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

constituted 19% of the total CPOM population identified. No amphibians orfish were observed.

Diversity at this station is considered superb. A significant percentage ofthe organisms collected are considered extremely pollution sensitive.

Habitat and Community Evaluation - The stream habitat analysis indicatedexcellent habitat qualities at the reference station. The stream sectionsampled had excellent substrate and instream cover, channel morphology, andriparian and bank cover. The stream section was -generally smaller in widthand flow than the other stations, but stream characteristics were similar.i

This difference could affect some quantitative comparisons, but thisdifference is not significant enough to affect the qualitative comparisonsperformed for this investigation.

^Stream community evaluations for the each of the ecological sampling stationswere made by comparing various community parameters at the sampling stationsof comparison against those of the reference station. Eight (8) metrics areused for community comparisons, as per Plafkin et al. (1989). The first seven(7) metrics compare the riffle/run community of a given station of comparisonagainst the reference station riffle/run community. The eighth metriccompares the CPOM community of a given station of comparison against thereference station CPOM community. The eight metrics are: (1) taxa richness,(2) the modified Family Blotic Index (FBI), (3) the ratio of scrapers tofilterers, (4) the ratio of EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) toChironomidae, (5) percent contribution of dominant family, (6) the EPT index,(7) the Community Loss Index (CLI), and (8) the ratio of shredders to totalI

number of organisms collected. The results of all tests are scored asfollows: 6 = Non-Impaired; 3 s Moderately Impaired; and 0 s Severely Impaired.The final assessment of potential impairment is made based on the percentcomparison of the total score of a given station of comparison to the totalscore of the reference station. More detailed scoring data can be found inTable 3.

'• j

1. Taxa richness is simply defined as the number of taxa found at the site.A diverse community (i.e., a high taxa richness) is an indicator of a

ftR301099

Page 66: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

healthy community. The reference station (ECOL-15) had a diversity ofseventeen (17) taxa, indicating a healthy riffle/run community existingin headwaters of this area.

2. The Family Biotic Index metric, modified from Hilsenhoff (1982), isindicative of the sensitivity of the aquatic community, with a value ofzero (0) being most sensitive and a value of ten (10) being mosttolerant. The FBI value at the reference station was 2.74, whichindicates a sensitive aquatic community.

^

3. The ratio of scraper and filtering collector functional feeding groups("scrapers" and "filterers," respectively) reflect the riffle/runcommunity food base. Scrapers are more abundant when there is anabundant periphyton community. Filterers are dominant when there areabundant attachment sites and fine particulate organic material (FROM).The reference station had two (2) scrapers and twenty-five (25)filterers (value s 0.08). This ratio is relatively low, but it isconsistent with expectations based on the habitat description.

4. The ratio of EPT to Chironomid abundance is a metric of communitystructure. Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies) andTrichoptera (caddisflies) are sensitive to water quality. TheChironomidae (midges) can be quite tolerant to poor water quality, butare found in healthy waters as well, but will constitute a lower ratioof organisms in the stream in healthy situations. A strongrepresentation of EPT indicates a healthy community. In contrast astrong representation of Chironomidae suggests impairment. Thereference station had a ratio of 30/7 (value - 4.29) indicating ahealthy community structure.

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family 1s a metric thatindicates community balance. In many cases a community with fewdominant taxa is indicative of environmental stress. A low percentcontribution of the dominant family typically suggests a healthycommunity. Ephemerellidae, a mayfly, was the dominant family at thereference station, and comprised 22% of the total number of organisms.

100

Page 67: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Ephemerellidae is a sensitive family, and 22% is a metric valueconsidered indicative of a healthy community.

6. The EPT index is a metric that increases as water quality improves. TheEPT index value summarizes the taxa richness within the insect groupsthat are generally pollution sensitive. The reference station has anEPT index value of ten (10), which is excellent.

'7. The CLI is a measure of dissimilarity that assesses the loss of benthic

taxa between the reference and the station 1>f comparison. Increaseddissimilarity reflects a community shift that could potentially bebrought on by the loss of sensitive taxa due to ecological stress. Ahigher CLI value indicates greater dissimilarity. A CLI value can notbe calculated for the reference station alone because it is a relativevalue.

! ;

8. The ratio of individuals in the shredder functional feeding group("shredders") versus total individuals collected in the CPOM sample is ametric used to measure impairment of the CPOM shredder community. Alower value indicates greater impairment. The ratio at the referencestation was 14/63 (value * 0.22). This is considered a moderatelyhealthy ratio for this habitat type.

The aquatic community at the reference station appears to be extremelyhealthy. Much of the population observed is considered extremely sensitive topoor water quality. j

STATION ECOL-02j

Station ECOL-02 was located immediately south of the electrical line right-of-way, approximately 100 yards east of Storm Road. The area surrounding thestation was either wooded or emergent field resulting from clearing thetelephone line right-of-way.

! i

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.14 m3/s. The streamconsisted of approximately 60% riffle, 30% run, and 10% pool. Cobble was the

fiRSQl 10!

Page 68: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

dominant inorganic substrate, and detritus was the dominant organic substrate.Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. The stream had anapproximately 40% canopy cover.

Riparian Vegetation - Both banks at ECOL-02 had similar vegetation diversityand dominance. Herbs consisted of various brambles, goldenrods, and asters.Ebony spleenwort, Christmas fern, and lady fern were also observed. Shrubsincluded common elder, staghorn sumac, and rhododendron. Grape was the onlywoody vine observed. Saplings consisted of sassafras, yellow birch, redmaple, green ash, black walnut, black cherry, apple, serviceberry, andAmerican basswood. Tree species included green ash, red maple, yellow birch,"red" oak1, and shagbark hickory.

Riparian Wildlife - No riparian wildlife was observed at ECOL-02.

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes and filamentous algae at ECOL-02 were common.No slime or periphyton was observed.

Aouatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL-02 had a diversity ofeighteen (18) taxa, eleven (11) of which were EPT representatives. EPTorganisms constituted 83% of the total population identified.Filterers/collectors constituted 67% of the total population, while scrapersconstituted approximately 2% of the population. Chironomids made up 6% of thepopulation. Dusky salamanders (Desmognathus sp.) were observed during thesampling. No fish were observed.

The CPOM sample had a diversity of nine (9) taxa, six (6) of which wererepresentative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 68% of the totalpopulation identified. Shredders constituted 13% of the total CPOM populationidentified. Chironoraids constituted 20% of the total CPOM populationidentified. No amphibians or fish were observed.

'Oaks hybridize freely and are often difficult to separate to species.The "red oaks," subgenus Erythrobalanus, were combined into the "red" oakcategory because of the inherent difficulty involved in separating them tospecies, particularly in winter condition.

flR30l 102

Page 69: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Diversity at this station is considered superb. A significant percentage ofthe organisms collected are considered extremely sensitive to pollution.

Habitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-02 was comparable to thereference station. Good to excellent substrate, stream cover, channelmorphology, and riparian and bank structure were observed. There was evidenceof significant changes in seasonal flow within the stream. Noticeably higherconcentration of organisms were collected in the deeper riffle/run areas thanin the shallower areas.

' • •*" i:1. Many of the eighteen. (18) families of macroinvertebrates in tfie

riffle/run sample are sensitive to poor water quality. The taxarichness of this station indicates an extremely healthy aquaticcommunity.

-2. The modified FBI gave a value of 2.21. The FBI at this station

indicates a sensitive aquatic community.I

3. One (1) scrapers and forty-two (42) collectors (value » 0.02) werepresent at the. sample station, suggesting the presence of FROM neededfor a healthy collector population and a lack of periphyton needed byscrapers.

4. The EPT.'Chironomidae ratio was 52/4 (value = 13.0), indicating anextremely healthy community. I

j

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Ephemerellidae) was33%. This indicates fair to good community balance, with the cjominantfamily being highly sensitive to pollution.

! I

i

6. The EPT index value was eleven (11), indicating a healthy aquaticcommunity.

!ji

7. The CLI value was 0.29, which is indicative of a aquatic communitysimilar to the reference station. i

Page 70: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 11/82 (value s0.13). This value could be considered low, however, the stream velocityand grade offers few areas for substantial CPOM deposition. The metricis evaluated to be indicative of a healthy aquatic community in thisstream type.

The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicatesextremely healthy conditions.

STATION ECOL-03

Sample station ECOL-03 was located upstream of Possinger Road, approximately100 yards east of the intersection of Storm Road and Possinger Road. The areasurrounding the station consists of woods and a partially vegetated sand bar.

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.12 m3/s. The streamconsisted of approximately 15% riffle, 65% run, and 20% pool. Cobble was thedominant inorganic substrate, and detritus was the dominant organic substrate.Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. The stream had anapproximately 30% canopy cover.

Riparian Vegetation - The herbs on the north bank at ECOL-03 consisted ofbrambles, jewel weed, and asters. Witch hazel and spicebush were the onlyshrubs observed. Green ash was the only sapling observed, and yellow birch,red maple, and grey birch were the tree species.

The south bank was similar to the north bank. The herbs included milkweed andjewelweed. Shrubs included witch hazel, spicebush, and alder. Saplingsconsisted of green ash and red maple. Tree species included yellow birch,grey birch, red maple, and green ash.

Riparian Wildlife - No riparian wildlife was observed at ECOL-03.

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes and filamentous algae at ECOL-03 were common.No slime or periphyton was observed.

5R301

Page 71: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Aquatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL-03 had a diversity offourteen (14) taxa, ten (10) of which were representative of EPT t xa. EPTorganisms constituted 77% of the total population identified.

iFilterers/collectors constituted 52% of the total population, while scrapersconstituted approximately 6% of the population. Chironomids made Up 13% ofthe population. No amphibians or fish were observed. i ..The CPOM sample had a diversity of nineteen (19) taxa, thirteen (13) of whichwere representative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 70% of the totalpopulation identified. Shredders constituted 23%*of the total CPOM populationidentified. Chironomids constituted 20% of the total CPOM populationidentified. Dusky salamanders and black-nose dace were observed.

i

Diversity at this station is considered superb. A significant percentage ofthe organisms collected are considered extremely sensitive to pollution.

Habitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-03 was comparable to thereference station. Excellent substrate and instream cover, channelmorphology, and riparian and bank structure were observed.

1. Many of the fourteen (14) families of macroinvertebrates in the rifflerun sample are sensitive to poor water quality. The taxa richness ofthis station indicates an extremely healthy aquatic community.

2. The modified FBI gave a value of 3.00. The FBI at this stationindicates a sensitive aquatic community. i

3. Three (3) scrapers and twenty-five (25) collectors (value = 0.12) werepresent at the sample station, suggesting the presence of FPOM neededfor a healthy collector population, and a lack of periphyton.

I: ' I

4. The EPT:Chironomidae ratio was 37/6 (value = 6.17), indicating a healthycommunity. |

AR3QI

Page 72: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Ephemerellidae) was27%. This indicates good community balance, with the dominant familyhighly sensitive to pollution.

6. The EPT index value was ten (10), indicating a healthy aquaticcommunity.

7. The CLI value was 0.50, which is indicative of an aquatic communitymoderately similar to the reference station.

8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 22/96 (value -0.23). This value is higher than at ECOL-02, and is thought to be dueto the observed presence of greater quantities of CPOM. This metric isevaluated to be indicative of a healthy aquatic community in this streamtype.

The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicatesextremely healthy conditions.

STATION ECOL-04

Sample station ECOL-04 was located upstream of North Road approximately 400feet east of the Butz Landfill. The area surrounding the station wascompletely wooded.

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.007 n /s. The streamconsisted of approximately 60% riffle, 35% run, and 5% pool. Silt was thedominant inorganic substrate, and muck/mud was the dominant organic substrate.Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. The stream had anapproximately 85% canopy cover.

Riparian Vegetation - The riparian vegetation on the east and west bank atECOL-04 were similar in diversity and dominance. Leucobryum, Sphagnum, andPolytricnium were the dominant bryophytes (non-vascular plants).Herbs included cinquefoil, speedwell, and aster. Shrubs consisted of witchhazel, spicebush, hawthorn, highbush blueberry, and nannyberry. Grape was the

106

Page 73: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

only woody vine observed, and serviceberry was the only sapling. Treesincluded "red" oak, red maple, black birch, white oak, and black tijpelo.

i'Riparian Wildlife - Rabbit scat was observed at ECOL-04. A cardinal was theonly bird observed at the station.

!

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes at ECOL-04 were common, and filamentous algaewas rare. No slime or periphyton was observed.

iAquatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL-04 had a diversity offourteen (14) taxa, eight (8) of which were representative of EPT taxa. EPTorganisms constituted 59% of the total population identified.Filterers/collectors constituted 82% of the total population, while scrapersconstituted approximately 2% of the population. Chironomids made up 14% ofthe population. No amphibians or fish were observed.

i

The CPOM sample had a diversity of eleven (11) taxa, six (6) of which wererepresentative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 33% of the totalpopulation identified. Shredders constituted 9% of the total CPOM populationidentified. Chironomids constituted 49% of the total CPOM populatlojiidentified. Dusky salamanders were observed.

Diversity at this station is considered good. A significant percentage of theorganisms collected are considered extremely sensitive to pollution.

i iHabitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-04 was found to becomparable to the reference station. Good to excellent substrate and instreamcover, channel morphology, and riparian and bank structure were observed.

1. Many of the fourteen (14) families of macroinvertebrates in the rifflej ,

run sample are sensitive to poor water quality. The taxa richness ofthis station indicates an extremely healthy aquatic community. :

i

2.. The modified FBI gave a value of 4.08. The FBI at this stationindicates a moderately sensitive aquatic community. ;

107

Page 74: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

3. One (1) scraper and forty-two (42) collectors (value = 0.02) werepresent at the sample station, suggesting the presence of FROM neededfor a healthy collector population, and a lack of periphyton.

4. The EPT:Chironomidae ratio was 30/7 (value = 4.29), indicating anhealthy community.

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Hydropsychidae: net-spinning caddisflies) was 20%. This indicates good community balance,with the dominant family being sensitive to-pollution.

6. The EPT index value was eight (8), indicating a healthy aquaticcommunity.

7. The CLI value was 0.57, which is indicative of a moderately similaraquatic community, when compared to the reference station.

8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 5/55 (value 30.09). The metric is evaluated to be indicative of a moderately healthyaquatic community in this stream type.

The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicates healthyconditions.

STATION ECOL-05

Sample station ECOL-05 was located immediately downstream of the bridge onStrausser Road. The area surrounding the station consists of a maintainedlawn and field. There was a small stand of trees present along the banks.

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.086 m3/s. The streamconsisted of approximately 20% riffle, 40% run, and 40% pool. Cobble was thedominant inorganic substrate, and detritus was the dominant organic substrate.Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. The stream had anapproximately 15% canopy cover.

108

Page 75: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Riparian Vegetation - The herb observed on the north bank at ECOL-05 consistedof goldenrod, jewelweed, aster, and sensitive fern. Shrubs included red-osierdogwood, and alder. Red maple was the only sapling observed, and grey birchwas the only tree. j

i '

Goldenrod, jewelweed, evening primrose, and milkweed were the herbs observedon the' south bank at ECOL-05. Shrubs included alder, winged sumac, and red-osier dogwood. Red maple was the only sapling and tree observed.

iiRiparian Wildlife - Cardinal, black-capped chicka'dee, and tufted titmouse werethe only bird species observed at ECOL-05.

i

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes at ECOL-05 were common, and filamentous algaewas rare. No slime or periphyton was observed.

i

Aquatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL-05 had a diversity ofthirteen (13) taxa, six (6) of which were representative of EPT taxa. EPTorganisms constituted 82% of the total population identified.Filterers/collectors constituted 18% of the total population, while scrapersconstituted approximately 49% of the population. Chironomids made up 5% ofthe population. Dusky salamanders and black-nose dace were observed.

IThe CPOM sample had a diversity of thirteen (13) taxa, seven (7) of which wererepresentative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 53% of the totalpopulation identified. Shredders constituted 20% of the total CPOM populationidentified. Chirononrids constituted 8% of the total CPOM populationidentified. Black-nosed dace were observed.

!ij

Diversity at this station is considered good. A significant percentage of theorganisms collected are considered extremely sensitive to pollution.

Habitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-05 was found to becomparable to the reference station. Excellent substrate and instream cover,channel morphology, and riparian and bank structure were observed.

HR3QI109

Page 76: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

1. Many of the thirteen (13) families of macroinvertebrates in the rifflerun sample are sensitive to poor water quality. The taxa richness ofthis station indicates a moderately healthy aquatic community.

2. The modified FBI gave a value of 4.11. The FBI at this stationindicates a moderately sensitive aquatic community.

3. Nineteen (19) scrapers and seven (7) collectors (value =• 2.71) werepresent at the sample station, suggesting the presence of a differentfood source being present for the scraper population.

4. The EPT:Chironomidae ratio was 32/2 (value * 16.0), indicating anextremely healthy community.

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Heptageniidae: mayfly)was 49%. This indicates moderately good community balance, with thedominant family being sensitive to pollution.

6. The EPT index value was six (6), indicating a fairly healthy aquaticcommunity.

7. The CLI value was 0.91, which is indicative of a aquatic communitymoderately similar to the reference station.

8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 10/47 (value a0.21). The metric is evaluated to be indicative of a healthy aquaticcommunity in this stream type.

The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicates anmoderately healthy conditions when compared to the reference station. In thiscase, the metric comparisons may be misleading. There appears to be a healthyaquatic community, but the community structure appears to be different.Functional feeding group abundances suggest that there may be an abundant foodsource for scrapers, perhaps periphyton, that 1s not present at the referencestation. This change in food supply would explain the community shift. Theaquatic community appears to be healthy at ECOL-05.

flR3QJ I 10

Page 77: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

STATION ECOL-07*" i

' !

Sample station ECOL-07 was located immediately upstream from Possinger Road,approximately one-half mile east of Strausser Road. The area surrounding thestation was a mixture of woodlands, fields, and farmland.

ii

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.18 m3/s. The streainconsisted of approximately 15% riffle, 70% run, and 15% pool. Cobble was thedominant inorganic substrate, and detritus was the dominant organic substrate.Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. 'The stream had anapproximately 20% canopy cover.

* ' i

Riparian Vegetation - Both the north bank and south bank at ECOL-07 hadsimilar vegetation diversities and dominance. A corn field was locatedapproximately fifteen (15) feet from the south bank. Herbs consisted ofgoldenrod species, evening primrose, brambles, sweetfern, aster species, reedcanary grass, willow-herb, sedge, heal-all, and various grasses. Shrubsincluded common elder, alder, and steeplebush. Saplings included white pine,grey birch, and red maple. Tree species consisted of white pine and redmaple.

Riparian Wildlife - The Carolina wren was present at ECOL-07. :; Ii

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes at ECOL-07 were abundant, and filamentousalgae was rare. No slime or periphyton was observed.

i

Aguatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL-07 had a diversity offifteen (15) taxa, nine (9) of which were representative of EPT taxa. EPTorganisms constituted 68% of the total population identified.Filterers/collectors constituted 69% of the total population, while scrapersconstituted approximately 7% of the population. Chironomids made up J% of thepopulation. No amphibians or fish were observed.

The CPOM sample had a diversity of twelve (12) taxa, nine (9) of which wererepresentative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 71% of the tot?1population identified. Shredders constituted 37% of the total CPOM population

flR30ljl I i

Page 78: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

identified. Chirononrids constituted 8% of the total CPOM populationidentified. No amphibians or fish were observed.

Diversity at this station is considered good. A significant percentage of theorganisms collected are considered extremely sensitive to pollution.

Habitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-07 was found to becomparable to the reference station. Excellent substrate and instream cover,channel morphology, and riparian and bank structure were observed.

.*

1. Many of the twelve (12) families of macroinvertebrates in the riffle runsample are sensitive to poor water quality. The taxa richness of thisstation indicates a healthy aquatic community.

2. The modified FBI gave a value of 3.33. The FBI at this stationindicates a moderately sensitive aquatic community.

3. Seven (7) scraper and sixty-nine (69) collectors (value s 0.10) werepresent at the sample station, suggesting the presence of FROM neededfor a healthy collector population.

4. The EPT:Chironomidae ratio was 68/1 (value = 68.0), indicating a healthycommunity.

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Ephemerellidae) was26%. This indicates good community balance, with the dominant familybeing sensitive to pollution.

6. The EPT Index value was nine (9), indicating a healthy aquaticcommunity.

7. The CLI value was 0.40, which 1s Indicative of a similar aquaticcommunity, when compared to the reference station.

flRSOi I 12

Page 79: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

I

8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 33/90 (value =0.37). The metric is evaluated to be indicative of a healthy aquaticcommunity in this stream type.

|The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicates healthyconditions.

iSTATION ECOL-09

'•• ' .• * ''

Sample Station ECOL-09 was located upstream from the bridge on Route 715 (nearthe Reeders Post Office), approximately one mile north of Mountain Road. Thearea around the station consisted of a mixture of woodland, field, maintainedproperty, and a parking lot used by the electric company. The gravel parkinglot was adjacent to the steep north bank.

!

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.41 m3/s. The streamconsisted of approximately 20% riffle, 30% run, and 50% pool. Cobble was thedominant inorganic substrate, and detritus-muck/mud was the dominant! organicsubstrates. Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. The stream hadan approximately 30% canopy cover.

Riparian Vegetation - Herbs found on the north bank at ECOL-09 consisted ofbrambles, goldenrods, asters, evening primrose, and sensitive fern. Shrubsconsisted of alder, multiflora rose, Japanese barberry, staghorn sumac,nannyberry, ninebark, witch hazel, and smooth blackhaw. Red maple was theonly sapling observed, with green ash, red maple, and black cherry being thetree representatives. A maintained yard was located approximately twenty-five(25) feet from the stream.

!

Herbs on the south bank consisted of brambles, evening primrose, aster, andQueen-Anne's lace. Shrubs included common elder, barberry, nannyberry,sassafras, and mountain-holly. Apple was the only sapling observed, and notrees were present. The south bank was bordered by a gravel parking lot.Much of the vegetation on the south bank had been cut back.

Riparian Wildlife - No riparian wildlife was observed at ECOL-09.

U R 3 0 I i 1 3

Page 80: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes at ECOL-09 were common, and filamentous algaewas rare. No slime or periphyton was observed.

Aquatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL-09 had a diversity ofseventeen (17) taxa, ten (10) of which were representative of EPT taxa. EPTorganisms constituted 63% of the total population identified.Filterers/collectors constituted 66% of the total population, while scrapersconstituted approximately 1% of the population. Chironomids made up 21% ofthe population. No amphibians or fish were observed.

>

The CPOM sample had a diversity of twenty-three (23) taxa, thirteen (13) ofwhich were representative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 65% of thetotal population identified. Shredders constituted 35% of the total CPOMpopulation identified. Chironomids constituted 18% of the total CPOMpopulation identified. No amphibians or fish were observed.

Diversity at this station is considered superb. A significant percentage ofthe organisms collected are considered extremely sensitive to pollution.

Habitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-09 was found to becomparable to the reference station. Good to excellent substrate and instreamcover, channel morphology, and riparian and bank structure were observed.

1. Many of the seventeen (17) families of macroinvertebrates in the rifflerun sample are sensitive to poor water quality. The taxa richness ofthis station indicates an extremely healthy aquatic community.

2. The modified FBI gave a value of 3.17. The FBI at this stationindicates a sensitive aquatic community.

3. One (1) scraper and fifty (50) collectors (value * 0.02) were present atthe sample station, suggesting the presence of FPOM needed for a healthycollector population, and a lack of periphyton.

4. The EPT:Chironomidae ratio was 48/16 (value - 3.0), indicating a healthycommunity.

SR30I I \k

Page 81: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Ephemerellidae) was21%. This indicates good community balance, with the dominant familybeing sensitive to pollution.

• I

6. The EPT index value was ten (10), indicating a healthy aquaticcommunity. ; .

! '

7. The CLI value was 0.56, which is indicative of a moderately similaraquatic community.

«•8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 34/97 Rvalue =

0.35). The metric is evaluated to be indicative of a healthy aquaticCPOM community in this stream type.

1 j

The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicates healthyconditions. The CLI indicates moderate dissimilarity. This is to be expectedsince the reference station is a First Order stream and ECOL-09 is a SecondOrder stream, which typically has a different community structure. FirstOrder streams typically have populations consisting of organisms that havedorsoventral flattening and/or have ventral or anterior morphologicaladaptations that act as hooks or suckers (group classification = clingers).Second Order streams have clingers as well as swimmers and sprawlers.Swimmers are capable of short bursts of fish-like swimming actions, althoughthey spend the majority of their time clinging. Sprawlers typically attachthemselves to floating debris or fine sediment and have morphologicaladaptations which aid in maintaining buoyancy. The community shift betweenstream orders is due to habitat changes, especially increased stream depth,decreased riffle area, decreased stream velocity, and increased CPOMdeposition areas (Merritt and Cummins, 1984). ECOL-09 had similar clingersbut also had swimmers and sprawlers (e.g. Leptophlebiidae, mayfly; andTaenlopterygidae, winter stonefly, respectively). \

STATION ECOL-11 j: / ' i

Sample Station ECOL-11 was located on east side of a private drive that joinsRailroad Drive approximately one-half mile from the intersection of Railroad

AR3.0I I 15

Page 82: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Drive and Route 715. The area surrounding the station was primarily wooded,and borders a maintained residence.

Stream Description - Estimated stream flow was 0.07 m3/s. The streamconsisted of approximately 20% riffle, 25% run, and 55% pool. Cobble was thedominant inorganic substrate, and detritus-muck/mud was the dominant organicsubstrates. Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed. The stream hadan approximately 70% canopy cover.

Riparian Vegetation - No herbs were observed on ttie north bank at ECOL-11.Spicebush was the only shrub observed. Saplings included black cherry, greybirch, black birch, and red maple. Tree representatives included yellow birchand red maple.

The herbs on the south bank consisted of brambles, goldenrods, and commonspeedwell. Shrubs included witch hazel, spicebush, blueberry, alder, andmountain-holly. Green ash, yellow birch, black birch, and quaking aspen werethe observed saplings. Trees included quaking aspen, red maple, green ash,shagbark hickory, sweet cherry, and black birch.

Riparian Wildlife - A black-capped chickadee was observed at ECOL-11.

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes and filamentous algae at ECOL-11 were common.No slime or periphyton was observed.

Aguatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL-11 had a diversity of nine(9) taxa, three (3) of which were representative of EPT taxa. EPT organismsconstituted 27% of the total population identified. Fi1terers/col1ectorsconstituted 86% of the total population, while scrapers constitutedapproximately 11% of the population. Chironomids made up 36% of thepopulation. No amphibians or fish were observed.

The CPOM sample had a diversity of eight (8) taxa, four (4) of which wererepresentative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 15% of the totalpopulation identified. Shredders constituted 1% of the total CPOM population

H R 3 0 I 1 1 6

Page 83: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

identified. Chironomids constituted 47% of the total CPOM populationidentified. No amphibians or fish were observed.

i!

Diversity at this station is considered poor. A significant percentage of theorganisms collected are considered fairly tolerant to pollution.

'• iHabitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-11 was found to becomparable to the reference station. Good to excellent substrate ajid instreamcover, channel morphology, and riparian and bank structure were observed,however, approximately 60 feet upstream is a lake'and approximately 20 feetdownstream is a large pooling area which enters a wetland. Therefore, onlythe section sampled has good habitat. The two lentic bodies seem to influencethe aquatic community found at the sample station.

,1. Nine (9) families of macroinvertebrates in the riffle run sample are

fairly tolerant to poor water quality. The taxa richness of thisstation indicates an moderately healthy aquatic community.

I

2. The modified FBI gave a value of 6.10. The FBI at this stationindicates a tolerant aquatic community.

j3. Fourteen (14) scrapers and 114 collectors (value = 0.12) were present at

the sample station, suggesting the presence of FROM needed for a healthycollector population, and a lack of periphytori.

i s

4. The EPT:Chironomidae ratio was 36/47 (value = 0.77), indicating anaquatic community shift with an absence of sensitive organisms.

"5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Chlronomidae: midges)

was 36%. This indicates fair community balance, with the dominantfamily being tolerant to pollution.

6. The EPT index value was ten (3), indicating a moderately impairedaquatic community.

11(17

Page 84: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

7. The CLI value was 1.33, which is indicative of a moderately dissimilaraquatic community.

8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 1/109 (value =0.01). The metric is evaluated to be indicative of an impaired aquaticCPOM community in this stream type.

The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicatesmoderately impaired conditions. The impairment is believed to be due to thesmall amount of good habitat and the influence of the surrounding waterbodies. This is supported by the presence of sensitive families such asOdontoceridae, Philopotamidae (caddisflies), and Leptophlebiidae (mayfly).

STATION ECOL-13

Sample Station ECOL-13 was located along a hedge row on the edge of a wetlandarea adjacent to the Rinker farmlands. The Rinker farm is located at the endof Storm Road. The area surrounding the station consists of a wooded hedgerow and an unused field.

Stream Description - Some of the flow at ECOL-13 is thought to originate fromdischarge of shallow ground water to the surface. Estimated stream flow was0.003 m3/s. The stream consisted of approximately 0% riffle, 10% run, and 90%pool (areas where the water was basically stagnant). Silt was the dominantinorganic substrate, and detn'tus-muck/mud were the dominant organicsubstrates. Evidence of detritus decomposition was observed, however, theamount of decomposition appeared to be reduced when compared to the otherstations. The stream had an approximately 30% canopy cover. Iron flocculentwas observed at this sample station.

Riparian Vegetation - The herbs on the north bank at ECOL-13 consisted ofbrambles, goldenrods, and asters. No other vegetation was observed. Thenorth bank appeared to be an abandoned agricultural field.

The herbs on the south bank consisted of rush species and common speedwell.Shrubs included mountain-holly, serviceberry, gooseberry, and smooth blackhaw.

AR30I i 18

Page 85: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Saplings included green ash, yellow birch, and sugar maple. Black birch,green ash, and shagbark hickory were the tree representatives observed. Atthe border of the south bank remnants of a stone wall were observed.

: - . {

Riparian Wildlife - No riparian wildlife was observed at ECOL-13.i

" • !

Aquatic Vegetation - Macrophytes at ECOL-13 were rare, and filamentous algaewas common. No slime or periphyton was observed.

•'; ' I

Aouatic Community - The riffle/run sample at ECOL--13 had a diversity of five(5) taxa, two (2) of which were representative of EPT taxa. EPT organismsconstituted 25% of the total population identified. Filterers/collectorsconstituted 75% of the total population, while scrapers constitutedapproximately 13% of the population. Chironomids made up 13% of thepopulation. No amphibians or fish were observed. _. j

;i

The CPOM sample had a diversity of six (6) taxa, two (2) of which wererepresentative of EPT taxa. EPT organisms constituted 14% of the totalpopulation identified. Shredders constituted 10% of the total CPOM populationidentified. Chironomids constituted 19% of the total CPOM populationidentified. No amphibians or fish were observed. i

;

Diversity at this station is considered poor. A significant percentage of theorganisms collected are considered fairly tolerant to pollution. •

!j

Habitat & Community Evaluation - The habitat at ECOL-13 was found to be non-supportive of the reference station organisms. Fair to good substrate andinstream cover, channel morphology, and riparian and bank structure wereobserved. This water body functions, in part, as a seep from the landfill.Flow appears to be greatly reduced during dry periods.

1. Most of the five (5) families of macroinvertebrates in the riffle runsample are fairly tolerant to poor water quality. The taxa richness of.this station indicates an impaired aquatic community.

4R301i19

Page 86: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

2. The modified FBI gave a value of 5.71. The FBI at this stationindicates a tolerant aquatic community.

3. One (1) scraper and six (6) collectors (value = 0.17) were present atthe sample station, suggesting fair community balance.

4. The EPT:Chironomidae ratio was 2/1 (value « 2.0), indicating amoderately impaired aquatic community.

5. The percent contribution of the dominant family (Sphaeriidae: freshwater clam) was 50%. This indicates poor community balance, with thedominant family being common in temperate water bodies.

6. The EPT index value was two (2), indicating an impaired aquaticcommunity.

7. The CLI value was 4.67, which is indicative of an aquatic communitydissimilar to the reference station.

8. The ratio of shredders to total organisms collected was 2/21 (value 30.10). The metric is evaluated to be indicative of a moderatelyimpaired aquatic community in this stream type.

The overall ecological assessment of the aquatic community indicates moderateto severe Impairment. Impairment may be caused by both poor habitat and siterelated contamination.

Terrestrial Walk-Through Evaluation

Terrestrial Vegetation - The ecological community on the landfill is asuccessional field (see PNDI, 1983; Reschke, 1990). A "successional field" or11 successional old field" is a disturbed ecological community where theoriginal vegetation was removed and repopulated by fast growing, opportunisticspecies. The landfill has been left undisturbed long enough to permit asparse density of shrubs (sweetfern) and saplings (sumacs, birches, andcherries) to invade the site. The vegetation is, however, predominately

flR30!120

Page 87: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

I

herbaceous; with grasses, goldenrod and asters dominant. Within thesuccessional field, there were three subcommunities identified during thewetlands analysis, that have been described in the wetlands section (Section4.2). This community is of the type that normally colonizes sites followingan ecological disturbance.

;Based on the surrounding forest, the original vegetation on the landfill isthought to have been a variant of the White Oak - Black Oak - Northern Red Oakforest cover type (see Eyre, 1980). This is a common subclimax or climaxforest type that occurs on moist to dry areas, orf many soil types, imdincludes a large number of variants. This forest type is distributedthroughout the eastern United States; from the prairie on the west to theAtlantic coast; from the Lake States, Southern Ontario and southern NewEngland southward into the coastal plain; and at elevations from 150 to 1,220m (Eyre, 1980). The off-site forest was mature, or nearly mature, secondaryor tertiary growth, but lacked the large over-mature trees and the v(indthrowntrees characteristic of a true climax forest. Vegetation on the landfill canbe expected to naturally succeed back to its original forest cover type overtime. |

i

There was initial concern related to the "barren patches" present in thesouthwest portion of the landfill. Upon closer examination, it was found thatthe surface was lacking true top soil and was a mixture shale and poorsubsurface soil. This results in a poor substrate for vegetation; however,mosses, lichens, and some herbs were found growing in these areas. Soilinvestigation indicated that there was no significant surficial contamination,and subsurface contamination, at depth below the root mass of most herbaceousplants, was found at some of the locations. After considering the soilquality and the contamination, when present, it appears that the limitingfactors for the vegetation are physical in nature and not due to sitecontamination. Successional growth is expected to occur at these locations; '

i

however, the rate of growth and succession is expected to be relatively slowas a result of the poor soil quality.

'. - ' i

Terrestrial Wildlife - Wildlife found on the landfill is typical of that foundin successional fields. Numerous signs of small mammal activity were

AR30IJ2I

Page 88: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

observed. Signs consisted of runways, nests, and scat in the herbaceouslayer. The meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) was sighted under debris inthe northern section of the landfill. A sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiterstriatus) was sighted at the south east section of the landfill. It was seenrepetitively returning to the same perch suggesting that the landfill may beutilized as a hunting ground. This further suggests that a population ofsmall mammals may be present on the landfill. However, the vegetative habitaton the landfill is sparse in many areas, offering limited cover for smallmammals. Numerous deer tracks and scat were observed on the landfill, alongwith evidence of browsing.

Additional bird species observed included a the song sparrow, Americangoldfinch, northern cardinal, black-capped chickadee, northern mockingbird,dark-eyed junco, white-throated sparrow, common crow, and downy woodpecker.All of the species mentioned are typical wintering birds found in successionalfield habitats.

Domestic chickens and domestic cats were observed on the landfill on manyoccasions.

Summary of Ecological Investigation

Aquatic Investigation - The aquatic investigation indicated an overallexcellent aquatic community and habitat. The stream at the reference stationwas slightly smaller than at the other stations, however, the streamcharacteristics and community appeared to be representative. Numeroussensitive organisms were collected. Diversity was superb with a high ratio ofEPT organisms. The only exception was found at ECOL-13 where ecologicalimpairment was evident, although it should be noted that the habitat as wellas potential site impacts, may both contribute to the impairment. The streamsin the area of Butz Landfill are ranked as High Quality Cold Water FishStreams (HQ-CWF) by the State of Pennsylvania. The aquatic community reflectsthis ranking.

Terrestrial Investigation - The terrestrial walk through revealed that thelandfill is experiencing early successional growth typical of a disturbed area

flRSO! 122

Page 89: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

in that region. There is poor surface soil present at many areas on thelandfill resulting in patches of sparse vegetative growth. Given time, thevegetation is expected to eventually return to woodlands similar to that whichsurrounds the landfill.

The wildlife is also typical of that found in successional growth.Populations of small mammals and game species, such as deer, were present.Birds observed are typical of that found in the habitat described a^nd seasonof the visit. Wildlife population utilizing the landfill is expected tochange with time as the vegetation succeeds back'into forest.

SR30!123

Page 90: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. II

30/SEPT/91

flR30l\2k

Page 91: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

FIGURE 1

STREAM SAMPLING DATA SHEET

Sit* N«m«: Bute Landfill Townthip: Jackson Towruhip

County: Monre* County State: PA

Stmpl* Station

Dat«

Tim*

Surrounding Land UIM(%}

[ .' '• '""•• Fan*:-:"'- : •.'" •• : '

. fWeWa*tuf* :

: • " • . . • '......;.'' .Aflricu«itf*::i:'':-\": '';.':''

RMfdMfiatftUntuMd

• , ' ' ' , COfYUY14KCfJU': '•' • : • "

, "':'.7:' :i.-:li"'":'in*»triiii.-.'''"'::':'i:';i'• '"•• . O«WKV--: '•-' •-*v:i;;;-'*v,:: '',-."/ ' Wat*rah«tfEfo«k)ft

:' EttiawMStnwmVlftdthM

E*ttmmi«t3tn*mD*pto (m)

'..: ':>;-:-v":.' • %RHB«:' •"•;" ;;::t;:'::',''

;' ••• ' •::;:\/%l ::'.;qj;':-":;;

"r': '^--::' '.:r'« F«-''':.'::'':: ;.' :;::':: •::'•;•:••:'.'' -:-:": Eat Strain V«too«y(m/»)

E«Um«t«d Sb»MnFIow<mV*)

•"' '" Hlflh:W«tw««iftO ;li ::';''

'> '"' ««ui4CKt*MkK«fksa8on»:f::::::'''

' • ' ' ' •'' • ' • ' Cwiopy 'CoW (1iJ|:;|:;:'::*i:;' S

• '"• *• ; "" s«a»i«i» hiS lll!;t' ''-.' •' ••:;::':»K»PIi|lf

-••/•V>."4"rai | ^:••'- :, - •: ;:••:• C*po»»r';;7; ;i;V::i::

ECOL-04

2/13/91

10:05

100

0

0

0

0

0

0

NONE

0.38

0.06

00

35

5

0.30

0.007

0.12

NONE

85

i!i:|||fe|-l|'NONE

NONE

NORMAL

ECOL-11

2/13/91

12:05

70

0

0

30

0

0

0

UTTLE

2.3

0.14

20

25

55

0.22

0.07

0.50

POND DRAIN.

70

NONE

NONE

NORMAL

ECOU-13

2/13/91

14:28

25

75

0

0

0

0

0

UTTLE

1

0.15

0

10

90

0.017

0.003

0.3

HEDGEUNE

30

NONE

NONE

FcFLOC.

ECOL-02

2/13/91

15:58

50

0

0

0

0

0

50(P-UNE)

UTTLE

2.3

0.1

00

30

10

0.00

0.14

1

POWER UNE

40

•i.:i:?;'':.-:i

NONE

NONE

NORMAL

ECOL-03

2/13/91

17:00

50

0

0

0

0

o50 (Flood 8k.)

UTTLE

1.6

0.4

15

65

20

0.19

0.12

1.8

NEAR ROAD

30

< ?;S:?'::; if' •-"•'"' ''•":'•'

NONE

NONE

NORMAL

flR30!125

Page 92: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

STREAM SAMPLING DATA SHEET (conf d)

Samptoatattoit

Dominant 8ub*b*t*Typ*(tnorg«nio>

% Bedrock

% Boulder ( >0.2Sm)

% Cobble (O.OC5 - 0.25m)

%Grav«t (0.002 -O.OSSmJ

X Sand (gritty)

%S»{gn»)

%Cl«y(tllcK)

Dominant Sub>trat*Typ*(Organic}

%O*bih»

% Muck/Mud

. % Mart " ' :"'::'

StmamTyp*

SilMmOcter :

StTMlBOII*

StMamTuriridlty

WMttMrCon100 % OVERCAST; 35-3

ECOL-04

SILT

0

10

30

20

0

40

0

MUCK/MUD

10

SO

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

CLEAR

dttforafff ; RAIN/SNOW

ECOL-11

COBBLE

0

10

65

5

5

15

0

DETRITUS-MUCK/MUD

50

50

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

ECOL-13

SILT

0

0

i

0

10«*

89

0

DETRITUS-MUCK/MUD

50

50

0

-

NONE

NONE

ECOL-02

COBBLE

0

5

60

10

10

15

0

DETRITUS

75

25

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

ECOL-03

COBBLE

0

5

60

120

10

15

0

DETRIRUS

80

20

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR CLEAR

Photograptm/NumbvnEach ttatlon had four picture* tafc«n (min.): up*tr«am; downstraam;

and botii bank>.

StrMm Ob««fvatloM/Sk«teh

flR30!I26

Page 93: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

STREAM SAMPLING DATA SHEET (confd)

Condition* • Parameters

1 SwnprtSWJon* || ECOU-04 ECOL-11 ECOL-13 ECOL-02 ECOL-03

Primary - Substnrts & Instrsam Covsr

t. Bottom substrate «nd 'availaWa-isovsr

2. Embsddsdnm*

3. Flow ' ' '• • • •'••'•• •

15

17

10

17

19

18

8

11

0

19

18

17

18

17

17

Secondary * ChannsJ Morphology

: 4* Charms! «H»ntBorf

9. Bottom scouring andv : . . , . ,'• deposition . '•••"'' '• .• . V-!:V:-' -: ..':V-

8. PoatfrWr*,. ruivbsfld ratio ;

14

10

0

3

0

14

a4

2

12

12

13

12

11

12

Tsrttary - Riparian * Bank Struoiur*

|7.Ban»l3tab«i -'" -.*:•• ' .' . '-->' '

ft. Bank Vtgttmon :• : - •

9. Sfeaam SJd« Cov« ' ' '' ' :

10

8

8

10

8

8

7

0

0

9

9

9

9

10

10

Comparisons

:" Total' Soot* •:*':•''•••••• .•':"'•'':.'•••••'•'•••:••••••

" . P«rc«r*o«.Com)aafabill«i|f,t«tixys;i:vif' :•Htlir«nc»;:; A.-.. •.•.'.•:•• '4:x; •'.••: '"»;•;•••' ;

R«rf»f«oc* ''v::'. :\ ' '''-i-Wi' •:' . '-r..-: 1'

107

92

Comparabt*

100

91

Comparabl*

82

53

Non-Suppoftiv*

110

100

CompwaMi

118

100

Compwabl*

Cond8k»«; . ... . . . . . . . ..._.......

:::**§ Supporting

" SupporHno '

flR30ll27

Page 94: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

STREAM SAMPLING DATA SHEET

B»nthlo Collection

Ob««rv»d Relative Abundance of Aquatic Biota

0 = Abtant/Not Observed 1 = Rait 2 - Common 3 = Abundant 4 = Dominant

Sample Type

Additional Comments

If Sample Station ECOL-04 ECOL-11 ECOL-13 ECOL-O2 ECOL-03 I

P«riphyton

Slim*.

Filamentous Algae

Macfofnvertafarate

Macfophyte*

R*f»

0

0

1

4

2

0

0

0

2

4

2

0

0

0

2

2

^i0

0

0

2

4

2

0

0

0

2

4

2

3

Rfflfe/Rtm Surbar

DrHbrat

D-Frwn*

CPOM D-Fram«

Hand

Colteotor* 1,

2. "

3.

PtMcrvailvw 1.

2. "

3.

X

X

X

DJ

CRB

50%ISOPROP.

H20

X

X

X

DJ

CRB

50%ISOPROP,

H20

X

X

X

DJ

CRB

50%1SOPROP

H20

X

X

X

X

DJ

CRB

50%1SOPROP.

H20

X

X

DJ

CRB

50%1SOPROP

H20

AR30I I28

Page 95: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

FIGURE 1

STREAM SAMPUNG DATA SHEET

Sit* Nam*: Butz Landfill Township: Jackson Township

County: Monro* County Stats: PA

Sample Station

Oat*

Tins*

Surrounding Land Use {%}

• ' Forest' :'. '.'' .' ""FieW/Pastur*Agricuftur*

Rwid«nt!aJ/Mairrtain«d

Commercial;Industrial1 •••:".'•••

;• other' " " •' •'•"'•" :;;:;:::

Watershed Eroafon

Estimated Str*am WMtto (m)

Estimated Str«un Depth (m)'•" ':: ' "•' '%«ffl*:;:>;::r''''..

• ' ' % Run '-.:. •"•••'.

• ' ' " ;'";'" •v:':'%Paot;-:-!i;'::-'::::':-v";

Est Straara V«tac«y (m/«)

Estimated Straam Flow (<rf/t)

High Water Mark (m)

Man-Mad* ModMortton*

: ' ,•• •' Canopy Cov*r (%J?'?P";;:-L,

' - ' S towrt/Sirti tateP-5?''' , . ' . . •'.•'.:',',',>-•-'• -i :-. ,-,v,-x-i'''i'i; •j'-x-X'j'iv,'. ;j. ,•.• ..••••"••: -: .-v o&im m

": :' " :•''•'',, '•.-.'. ' .:;'.'': '' O8''-:- ^ ;: '::-::':'v?y:-:J;'

'• :' ." "•':", ' D»pOsji!v;f f i'''"'--'"'

ECOL-05

2/14/91

10:15

15

40

0

45

0

0

0

LITTLE

2.3

0.1

20

40

40

0.38

0.086

1.1

D.S OF ROAD

15

;;|:i;|||||;::?;|;s;:;:'!' .•

NONE

NONE

NORMAL

ECOL-07

2/14/91

13:00

50

40

10

0

0

0

0

LITTLE

2.0

0.12

15

70

15

0.75

0.18

1.0

U.S. OF ROAD

20

NONE

NONE

NORMAL

ECOL-15

2/14/91

13:40

15

20

0

65

0

0

0

LITTLE

1

0.07

60

30

10

1.0

0.07

0.7

NONE

20

v;4;::: ;::;; •;:,;,;;:;:; ••.

NONE

NONE

NORMAL

ECOL-09

2/14/91

14:30

20

15

0

20

15

0

30 (P. LOT)

LITTLE

3

0.23

20

30

50

0.60

0.414

2.5

BRIDGE

30

NONE

NONE

NORMAL

I29

Page 96: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

STREAM SAMPLING DATA SHEET (eonfd)

Sampl* Station

Dominant Substrate Type(Inorganic)

% Bedrock% Boufder ( >0.2Sm)

% Cobble (D.065 - 0.25m)

% Gravel (0.002- 0,065m)% Sand (gritty}% Silt (fine)% Ctay (sllefc)

Dominant SubstrateTyp« (Organic)

%Detrftua% Mock/Moct%Mart

Stream Type

Stream Odor

Stream Otts

Stream Turbidity

ECOL-05

COBBLE

0

10

60

10

5

15

0

DETRITUS

60

40

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

CLEAR

ECOL-07

COBBLE

0

5

55

5

15

20

0

DETRTTUS

85

15

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

CLEAR

ECOL-15

COBBLE

0

5

65

20

'10

0

0

DETRITUS

100

0

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

CLEAR

ECOL-09

COBBLE

0

25

35

10

15

20

0

DETRITUS-MUCK/MUD

50

50

0

CWF

NONE

NONE

CLEAR

Weather Conditions Photographs/Number*1 00 % OVERCAST: 38-45'F; HEAVY RAIN Each station had four pictures taken (min.): upstream;

downstream; and both banks.

Stream Observations/Sketch

flR30iISO

Page 97: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

STREAM SAMPLING DATA SHEET (conf d)

Conditions - Parameter*

| Sample Station* ECOL-05

Primary - Substrata & Instroam Covor

1. Bottom substrate andavailable cover

• 2. Embsddednaa*3, Flow •

16

1817

ECOL-07 ECOL-15 ECOL-09 jj

16

1817

15

1817

16

1817

Secondary • Channel Morphology

4. Channel atefafion5. Bottom scouring anddeposition '•':

6. Pool/riffte, run/band ratfo

1212

12

1213

13

1213

12

1012

12

Tertiary - Riparian & Bank Structure

7. Bank Stability8. Bank Vegetation9, Stream Side Cover

999

9910

10109

976

Comparisons

Total ScorePercent of .Comparability toReference .• : ••"'•" ' .". ".".:':'Station Assessment Comparedto Reference '•'.••'

11498

Comparable

117101

Comparable

116100

Reference

10792

Comparable

Condition*

Primary;

SecondaryTertiary

Excellent

:f*15SS::';"'"tMS:r:::-

:-••%'.*&'.•

is$;&)•'»*&'

$$?$•'

:*:_,. fair:;.; :-..,

fe$$'f -**.'.'

!!:;»:•

i;i Poor

110:\i €W:?-%,*ti

Assessment

Comparable: to ReferenceSupportfrig

Supporting

Supporting:: V

Percent ofCompawWlKy

liilSl':-;----'-7*a85te-?'::'

;|g%< f-

131

Page 98: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

STREAM SAMPLING DATA SHEET

Banthic Collection

1 Sample Station ECOL-OS ECOL-07 ECOL-15 ECOL-09

Obaerved Relative Abundance of Aquatic Biota

Pariphyton

Slim*

Filamentous Algae-Macroinvert»brat»Macrophytae

Fish

00

1

4

2

2

0

0

1

4

3

2

0

0

0

>

3

1

0.

0

1

4

2

2

0 = Absent/Not Observed 1 = Rare 2 = Common 3 = Abundant 4 =» Dominant

Sample Type

Riffle/Run SurberDriftnetD-Frame

CPOM D-FrameHand

Collector* t.2.3.

PreeervaUvee t.

2. •.. • '

3. ' .»••

X

X

X

X

OJ

CRB

50%ISOPROP.

H20

X

X

X

DJ

CRB

50%ISOPROP.

H20

X

X

X

OJ

CRB

50%ISOPROP

H20

X

X

X

DJ

CRB

50%ISOPROP

H20

Additional Comment*

SR30H32

Page 99: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

AR30I133

Page 100: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-02 iTownship: Jackson Date: Feb. 13, 1991County: Monroe Time: 16:00State: PA Recorders: DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes No _XX (If no, explain)Powerl i ne Ri ght-of -Way ___ ________ ___

Has the vegetation, soils, or hydrology been significantly disturbed?Yes XX_ No _^ (If yes, explain)Power! ine Right-oT^Way ___________________________Indicator ' —————————

Bryophvtes __ Status Woody Vines ___ Status1. ________________ _____ 1. Vitus spp. ______2. 2.~ ______ ~~~_3. ————————————————— ———— 3. -—-—-—————

Herbs1. Rubus spp.2. Soli dago spp.3. Aster spp.4. Ebony Spleenwort5. Christmas Fern6. Lady Fern7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Common Elder2. staghorn Sumac3. Malus spp.4. Amelachier spp.5. Vaccinium spp.b. sassafras7. Rhododendron spp.8.9.10.Dominant species are: OBL

FACU" "FACU"~FAC

FACW" UPL

FACU

FACW

Saplings1. Yellow Birch2. Red Maple3. Green Ash4. Black Walnut5. Black Cherry6. American Basswood7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees1. Green Ash2. Red Maple3. Yellow Birch4. "Red" Oak5. Shagbark Hickory6.7.8.9.10.FAC FACU X UPL

FACFACFACWFACUFACU

' " FACU"

FACWFACFACFACUFACU

Comments: The vegetation community on the east and west .bank of the stream wasthe same.

Page 101: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz LandfilTownship: JacksonCounty: MonroeState: PADo normal environmentalYes _XX_ No __

Has the vegetation, soilYes __ No _XX_

Bryoohvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Rubus spp.2. Jewel weed3. Aster spp.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Witch Hazel2. Spicebush3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

1 Sample Location: BL-ECOL-03-NDate: Feb 14, 1991Time: 09:50Recorders: DJ/CRB

conditions exist at the plant community?(If no, explain)s, or hydrology been significantly distu(If yes, explain)

Indicator IStatus Woodv Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1. Green Ash

FACW 2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees

FAC 1. Yellow BirchFACW 2. Red Maple

3. Grey Birch4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

rbed?

ndicatorStatus

_FACW_

————

FACFAC

"FAC

Dominant species are; OBL FACW FAC X FACU UPL

Page 102: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site-Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-03-STownship: Jackson Date: Feb 14, 1991County: Monroe Time: 09:50State: PA Recorders: DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes XX No (If no, explain)Older Th~an North~513e

Has the vegetation, soiYes __ No _XX_

Brvophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Milkweed2. Jewel weed3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Witch Hazel2. Spicebush3. Alder4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

Is, or hydrology been significantly(If yes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woodv Vines

1. Grape2.3.4.

Saplings1. Green Ash

FACW 2. Red Maple3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees1. Yellow Birch

FACW 2. Red Maple3. Grey Birch4. Green Ash5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

disturbed?!

IndicatorStatus

i!

FACWFAC

'

!

FACFACFACFACW

i

j

1I

Dominant species are; OBL ~ FACW FAC X FACU UPT

4R30I136

Page 103: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-04Township: Jackson Date: Feb 14, 1991County: Monroe Time: 10:05State: PA Recorders: DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes _XX_ No __ (If no, explain)Has the vegetation, soils,Yes __ No _XX_ (If

Brvoohvtes1. Leucobryum2. Sphagnum3. Polytrichium4.

Herbs1. Potentilla spp.2. Speedwell3. Aster4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Witch Hazel2. Spicebush3. Hawthorn4. Highbush Blueberry5. Viburnum lentago6.7.8.9.10.Dominant species are: OBL

or hydrology been significantlyyes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woodv Vines

1. Grape2.3.4.

Saplings1. Serviceberry2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees

FAC 1. "Red" OakFACW 2. Red MapleFACU 3. Black BirchFACW 4. White OakFAC 5. Black Tupelo

6.7.8.9.10.

FACW FAC X FACU X UPL

disturbed?

IndicatorStatus

FACUFACFACUFACUFAC

Comments: Rabbit Scat, CaTdlnal at site; "Vegetation at East and West sides ofstream bank are the same.

HR3QI137

Page 104: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-05-STownship: Jackson Date: Feb 14, 1991County: Monroe Time: 10:15State: PA Recorders: DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes XX No (If no, explain)

Has the vegetation, soiYes No XX

Brvophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Sol i dago spp.2. Jewel weed3. Evening Primrose4. Milkweed5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Alder2. Winged Sumac3. Red-Osier Dogwood4.5.6.7.8.9.10.

Is, or hydrology been significantly(If yes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1. Red Maple

FACW 2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees1. Red Maple

UPL 2.FACW 3.

4.5.6.7.8.9.10.

disturbed?

IndicatorStatus|i

'

FAC

[

1

!!

|

I

I

II

FAC

Dominant species aret OBL FACW FAC X FACU UPL.Comments: Cardinal, Black-capped Chickadees and Tufted Titmouse seen at site.

HR30I138

Page 105: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-05-NTownship: Jackson Date: Feb 14, 1991County: Monroe Time: 10:15State: PA Recorders: DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes " XX No (If no, explain)

Has the vegetation, soiYes __ No _XX_

Bryophytes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Soli dago2. Jewel weed3. Aster4. Sensitive Fern5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Red-Osier Dogwood2. Alder3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

Is, or hydrology been significantly(If yes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1. Red Maple

FACW 2.3.

FACW 4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees

FACW 1. Grey Birch2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

disturbed?

IndicatorStatus

FAC

FAC

Percent of dominant species that are: OBL FACW X FAC FA"CU UPL

fiR30!139

Page 106: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

' i

Site Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-07Township: Jackson Date: Feb 14, 1991County: Monroe Time: 13:00State: PA Recorders: DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes XX No (If no, explain)Cornfield" 20' S of road. Cleared (brushy) ± 20' back from road.Has the vegetation, soils, or hydrology been significantly disturbed?Yes __ No _XX_ (If yes, explain)

Brvophvtes1.Z.3.4.

Herbs1. Various Grasses2. Soli dago spp.3. Evening Primrose4. Rubus spp.5. Sweetfern6. Aster7. Reed Canary Grass8. Willow-herb9. Carex spp.10. Heal -All11.12.Shrubs1. Red Maple2. Common Elder3. Alder4. Steep! ebush5.6.7.8.9.

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1. White Pine2. Grey Birch3. Red Maple4.

UPL 5.6.

FACU 7.FACW 8.

9.FAC 10.

11.12.Trees

FAC 1. White PineFACU 2. Red Maple

3.FACW 4.

5.6.7.8.9.

IndicatorStatus

.

i

FACUFACFACU

]

FACUFACj!

1

Dominant species are: OBL FACW FAC _X F A C U D P TComments: Carolina Wren Reard atTite. North a~nd~ Soufffbank with the samevegetation except for the cornfield ±15' to the south of stream. Cleared about20' from road, adjacent to woodlot.

Page 107: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz LandfiTownship: JacksonCounty: MonroeState: PADo normal environmentalYes No XXSouth bank boardered Evcut back.Has the vegetation, soiYes _XX_ No __See above

Bryophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Rubus spp.2. Evening Primrose3. Aster4. Queen-Annes Lace5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Common Elder2. Barberry3. Viburnum lentago4. Sassafras5. Mountain-holly6.7.8.9.10.

11 Sample Location: BL-ECOL-09-SDate: Feb 14, 1991Time: 14:30Recorders: DJ/CRB

conditions exist at the plant community?(If no, explain)qravel parking lot. Plants on streambank

Is, or hydrology been significantly distu(If yes, explain)

Indicator IStatus Woody Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1. Apple (cut back)2.3.

UPL 4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees

FACW 1.FACU 2.FAC 3.FACU 4.FACW 5.

6.7.8.9.10.

rbed?

ndicatorStatus

UPL

Percent of dominant species that are: OBL_ FACW_ FAC _X_ FACU_ UPL_

AR301 1 1 * 1

Page 108: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz Landfi"Township: JacksonCounty: MonroeState: PADo normal environmentalYes XX NoMaintained yard wvtRTnHas the vegetation, soiYes __ No _XX_

Bryophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Rubus spp.2. Soli dago spp.3. Aster4. Evening Primrose5. Sensitive Fern6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Alder2. Multi flora rose3. Japanese Barberry4. staghorn Sumac5. Viburnum lentago6. Ninebark7. Witch Hazel8. Viburnum pruni folium9.10.11.12.

11 Sample Location: BL-ECOL-09-NDate: Feb 14, 1991Time: 14:30Recorders: DJ/CRB

conditions exist at the plant community?(If no, explain)25' of river.Is, or hydrology been significantly(If yes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1. Red Maple2.3.4.

FACW 5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees1. Green Ash

FACU 2. Red MapleFACU 3. Black CherryUPL 4.FAC 5.FACW 6.FAC 7.FACW 8.

9.10.11.12.

disturbed?

IndicatorStatus

j

FACi

j

1I

FACWFACFACU

i

Dominant species are; OBL ~ FACW FAC X FACU UPT

flRSOi |l*2

Page 109: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz LandfiTownship: JacksonCounty: MonroeState: PADo normal environmentalYes _XX_ No __

Has the vegetation, soiYes __ No _XX_

Brvophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Rubus spp.2. Soli dago spp.3. Common Speedwell4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Witch Hazelz. spicebush3. Blueberry4. Alder5. Mountain-holly6.7.8.9.10.

11 Sample Location: BL-ECOL-11-SDate: Feb 14, 1991Time: 12:05Recorders: DJ/CRB

conditions exist at the plant community?(If no, explain)

Is, or hydrology been significantly di(If yes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1. Grape2.3.4.

Saplings1. Green Ash2. Yellow Birch

FACU 3. Black Birch4. Quaking Aspen5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees

FAC 1. Quaking AspenFACW 2. Red Maple

3. Green Ash4. Shagbark Hickory

FACW 5. Sweet Cherry6. Black Birch7.8.9.10.

sturbed?

IndicatorStatus

FACW"FAC ~FACIT"FACW"

FACWFAC ~"FACW"FACU"

"UPL"FACET

Dominant species are: OBL FACW X FAC FACU UPLComments: Black-Capped Chickadee seen at site.

5R30I 11*3

Page 110: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz LandfiTownship: JacksonCounty: MonroeState: PADo normal environmentalYes _XX_ No __Has the vegetation, solYes __ No _XX_

Brvophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Splcebush2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

11 Sample Location: BL-ECOL-11-N >Date: Feb 14, 1991Time: 12:05Recorders: DJ/CRB

conditions exist at the plant community?(If no, explain) "

Ts, or hydrology been significantly di(If yes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woodv Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1. Black Birch2. Grey Birch3. Black Cherry4. Red Maple5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees

FACW 1. Yellow Birch2. Red Maple3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

sturbed?

IndicatorStatus

!

|

FACU"FACFACO~

~FAC

j

!!1i

FAC~FAC

i

Dominant species are: OBL FACW FAC X FACU UPL

AR30I\kk

Page 111: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz LandfilTownship: JacksonCounty: MonroeState: PADo normal environmentalYes No XXFencerow with stone wal

Has the vegetation, soilYes __ No _XX_

BrvoDhvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Juncus2. Common Speedwell3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1. Mountain-holly2. Serviceberry3. Ribes spp.4. Viburnum prunifolium__5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

1 Sample Location: BL-ECOL-13-SDate: Feb 13, 1991Time: 14:30Recorders: DJ/CRB

conditions exist at the plant communi(If no, explain)1.

ty?

s, or hydrology been significantly disturbed?(If yes, explain)

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1. Smilex spp.2. Poison Ivy3.4.

SaplingsFACW 1. Green AshFACU 2. Yellow Birch

3. Sugar Maple4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees

FACW 1. Black Birch2. Green Ash3. Shagbark Hickory

FACU 4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

IndicatorStatusFAC

FACWFAC "*~FACO~

FACUFACW"FACU"

Dominant species are; OBL FACW FAC FACU X UPL

AR30! 11*5

Page 112: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site- Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-13-NTownship: Jackson Date: Feb 13, 1991County: Monroe Time: 14:30State: PA Recorders:, DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes XX No __ (If no, explain)

Oid~fefld habitaF"Has the vegetation, soils, or hydrology been significantlyYes __ No _XX_ (If yes, explain)

Bryophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Rubus spp.2. Solidago spp.3. Aster4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.Dominant species are:

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.

OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL

disturbed?

IndicatorStatus

1

1

ji

!

!1i

i

1i

il1!

I

1

!

Comments: North bank is an old-feild that has not been mowed in 2-3+ years.

Page 113: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz LandfiTownship: JacksonCounty: MonroeState: PADo normal environmentalYes _XX_ No __

Has the vegetation, soiYes No XX

Brvophvtes1.2.3.4.

Herbs1. Day-1 illy2. Soli dago spp.3. Rubus spp.4. Jewel weed5.6.7.8.Shrubs1. Alder2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.

11 Sample Location: BL-ECOL-15-NDate: Feb 14, 1991Time: 13:40Recorders: DJ/CRB

conditions exist at the plant community(If no, explain)

Is, or hydrology been significantly dist(If yes, explain)

.IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1. Poison Ivy2.3.4.

Saplings1. Green Ash2. Grey Birch3.

FACW 4.5.6.7.8.Trees1. Norway Spruce12. Hickory spp.3. Green Ash4. Black Walnut5. Red Maple6.7.8.9.10.

urbed?

IndicatorStatus

FAC

FACWFAC ~

FACWFACU"FAC "

Dominant species are: OBL FACW X FAC X FACU UPL_ _Comments: Black-Capped Chfcfiadees arid Squirrels seen at sifeT Turkey tracks alsoobserved at site.

'The Norway spruce was planted and located closer to the creek than all ofthe other woody plant species.

A R 3 0 I I U 7

Page 114: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TERRESTRIAL VEGETATIONAPPENDING DATA SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLING

Site Name: Butz Landfill Sample Location: BL-ECOL-15-STownship: Jackson Date: Feb 14, 1991County: Monroe Time: 13:40State: PA Recorders: DJ/CRBDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?Yes No _XX_ (If no, explain)South bank is a lawn.Has the vegetation, soils, or hydrology been significantlyYes __ No _XX_ (If yes, explain)

Bryoohytes1.z.3.4.

Herbs1. Mowed grass2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Shrubs1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.dominant species are: OBL_

IndicatorStatus Woody Vines

1.2.3.4.

Saplings1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.Trees1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.

FACW FAC FACU UPL

disturbed?

IndicatorStatus

1

!

1

1

I

1

t

I

I

.l

'1

4R30JIkB

Page 115: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

Page 116: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Note: All of the riffle/run and CPOM samples collected at each of theecological sampling stations were subsampled. The organisms listed on thefollowing data sheets constitute approximately one quarter of the total numberof organisms In the sample. The diversity of organisms within each subsampleIs expected to be smaller than the sample as a whole. The relative;diversities between samples remains the same. The decrease in taxa diversityIn the subsamples as compared to the whole samples 1s estimated to be on themagnitude of one or two taxa less per sample.

150

Page 117: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-2Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon1 Desmognathus sp.2 Hy dropsy chl dae3 Pel toperl i dae4 Peril dae5 Corydalidae6 Capnlldae7 Heptageniidae8 Leptoph I eD1 i dae9 Chlronomidae

To Ephemerellldae II~11" "Ephemerel 1 i dae~"f 2"12" "Simuliidae13 Gomphidae14 Phllopotanridae15 Rhyacophilidae16 Dytisddae17 Lepldostomatidae18 Limnephilldae19 Turbellaria

*2_

13'"2412-4-13-8"113321

'"2"1"

Source1 Couplet Sequence8 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID1 Sight ID7 Sight ID7 Sight ID1 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID5 Sight ID

Det.CRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBDJ

Comments: Ephemerellldae II 1s the genus Serratella, iZ 1s the genusEury 1 opheTl a._________________________________

References listed on last page of appendix.

1 5 1

Page 118: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMSi

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-2Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon i Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Tlpulidae______ 6 1__ Sight ID______________ CRB

"~2" "Peltoper!idae ~ Zl" ~~477~~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"3" "Rhyacophi 1 idae——— 3" ~~4,7~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"

""4" "Ephemerellidae~72~ "5" ~~7 "~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"~5~ "Ephemerellidae "II" I0~ "~7~~~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"~6" "Chironomidae ~" ~ 16" ""1—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"~~7~ "Si mull idae 4" "~ 1—— "Sight ID T "CRB"~~8" "Capniidae "3" ~~4T7~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"""i" "Leptophlebiidae "" Tl" ~"4,7~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"

'" "Perlodidae —— 2" "~4,7"~ "Sight ID —— "—"

Comments: EphemerelHdae II is the genus Serratella, 12 is the genusEurylopheTla. All mayflies in bad condition. One Perlodid is a very earlyinstar. Some Chirononids in mud case. Three of the six Tipulids are a muchsmaller species.

References listed on last page of appendix.

HR30I 152

Page 119: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-3Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon1 Corydalidae2 Heptageniidae3 capnlldae4 Hy dropsy chidae5 Tipulidae6 Libellulidae7 Ephemereliidae Jl8 Chlronomidae9 Ephemereliidae 12

"TO" "Baetldae11 Perlidae12 Leptophlebiidae13 Limnepmndae14 Calamoceratidae15 Brachycentri dae

i1323311261112'83"1"

Source174,74,74,714,7

~7I74,74,74,74,74—4 ——

Couplet SequenceSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDPg. 259: 1', 2', 4', 5', 13'Pg. 259: I' ' '.S'.IS

Det,CRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRB

,14', 15 CRBCRB

Comments: Ephemereliidae II 1s the genus Serratella, 12 is the genusEurylopheTla.___________________________________

References listed on last page of appendix.

153

Page 120: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMSi • i

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-3Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

j

TN Taxon I Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Desmognathus sp. 1 8__ Sight ID_____________ CRB

~2" "Pel toper! i dae — "1" """477"" "Sight ID —— "CRB"~~3" "Ephemerellidae 12 Tl" ~"7 "~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"""4" "Ephemerellidae ll~ 14" "~7—— "Sight ID — "CRB"~5~ "Hydropsychidae_~~ 1" "~477~~ "Sight ID — "CRB""~6~ "Chironomidae ——— 19" "~1 "~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"""T "LeptophlebiiHae—— 14" ~"477~~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"""8" "Simuliidae —— 3" ""1 "" "Sight ID —— "CRB""~9~ "Black-NoseUace—— "3" ~~2—— "Sight ID —— "CRB""TO" "Tipulidae —— "3" ~"1—— "Sight ID —— "CRB""11" "Tabanidae "1" ~"1—— "Sight ID —— "CRB""12" "Dytiscidae "" "2" ""7—— "Sight ID —— "CRB""13" "Acari "1" ""5—— "Sight ID —— "CRB""14" "taeniopterygldae "2" 7__ Pg. 184: l',Z',3,4 "CRB""15" "Perlodidae —— "4" ""477 Sight ID_____ ~" "CRB""16" "Ephemeridae______ "2" 7__ Pg. 97: l',Z,3',4,5,6' "CRB""17" "Capniidae "1" ~"477"~ Sight ID_______~"~~~ ~CRB""18" "LimnephiHdae 12" "~7 "" "Sight ID —— "CRB""19" "Rhyacophilidae___ 1" 4 Pg. 259: l>.Z'.4>,S,e>.7>v8>,^ "CRB""20" "Odontoceridae___ "2" 4 Pg. 259; ll>2't4'tS't13',14',

; 15', 16 *, 17' 118 * CRB21 Leptoceridae____ 1 4 Pg. 259: I1.2',4________ "CRB"22 "Phryganeidae 1" ~47T _Sight ID —— "—"

Comments: Ephemerellidae II is the genus Serratella, 12 is the genusEurylopheTla. The Leptocerid is very small and was bisected duringidentification." The water mite appears to be in the family Sperchonidae.

'References listed on last page of appendix.A-5

Page 121: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-4Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon1 Hydropsy chidaeZ simullldae3 Ephemerellidae it4 Chironomidae5 Baetidae6 Dixidae7 Tipulidae8 Ephemeral 1 1 dae #19 Heptageniidae

"To Ptychopteri dae11 Philopotamidaeiz Perl odl dae13 Limnephllldae14 Veliidae15 Odontocerldae

t Source1 Couplet Sequence10 4,7 Sight ID9• -4- "7"6

" ~1~ "2- -2- -

. -r•"!"•-2-

1"-3-11"

1 Sight ID7 Sight ID1 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID1 Sight ID1 Sight ID7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID1 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID3 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID

Det,CRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRB

Comments: Ephemerel11dae II is the genus Serratella, tZ 1s the genusEurylopheTI a._________________________________________________

References listed on last page of appendix.

H R 3 0 J I 5 5

Page 122: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS !. j

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-4Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon I Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Tipulidae______ 5 1 Sight ID______________ CRB

~~2~ "Dytiscidae ~ ~1~ 7 ""Sight ID —— "CRB"~~3~ "RhyacophiHdae "7" ~~477~~ "Sight ID """ "CRB"~"4" "Hydropsychldae——— "2" ~~4,7~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"~~"5~ "Baetldae ——— "3" ~~4,7~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"~6~ "Simuliidae "" "3" ~"1 ~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"7" "Desmognathus sp. . "1" 8__ "Sight ID______________ "CRB"

~"8" "Corydalidae —— ~1~ ~"7—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"~9~ "Chironomidae "" ?7~ ""1—— "Sight ID "CRB""TO" "Perl odi dae 3" H477II "Sight IP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —— ~CRB~"11" "Phllopotamldae "1" 3__ "Adult pg. 581; l',z,3 "CRB""11" "Phi 1 opotamidae——— "1" "477 "Urva - Sight ID "CRB""12" "Leptoceridae____ "1" _4,7_ Sight'ID_____________ ~_~

Comments:

'References listed on last page of appendix.

1R30I156

Page 123: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-5Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon1 Tipulidaez Heptageniidae3 Desmognathus spi.4 Black-nose Dace5 Asellidae6 Perlidae"7 Chironomldae8 Simullidae9 Baetidae10 Crustacea11 Ephemeridae1Z Limnephi Hdae13 Perlodidae14 Eggs

*1191™

1"1"2~r22"1""8"i™

Source114,78254,7114,75

-J;J-4,7

Couplet SequenceSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight ID

Det.CRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBDJCRBCRBCRBCRB

Comments:

References listed on last page of appendix.

8R30I157

Page 124: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-5Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA j

I

TN Taxon I Source1 Couplet Sequence Oet.1 Tipulidae______ 1 1 Sight ID ____________ CRB

~"2~ "SimulHdae I4~ ~~1—— "Sight ID"" ~ "CRB"~"3" "Chironomidae "" 4~ ""1__ "Sight ID —— ~CRB"~"4~ "Heptageniidae "1" ~~477~~ "Sight ID T~ ~CRB"~"5~ "Baetidae "5" ""4,7"" "Sight ID —— ~CRB~~~6~ "Leptophleblldae — "8 4,7 "Sight ID "CRB"~7~ "Asellidae —— "4" ""5 ~~ "Sight ID "CRB"~~8" "Capniidae "2" ~~477"~ "Sight ID— ' "CRB"~"9" "Perlodidae "1" ~~4,7~ "Sight ID"" —— "CRB""TO" "Black-Nose Dace ~ "1" ~"2 ~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"11" "Ephemerellidae TT^ "1" ~~7~~~ "Sight ID _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —— "CRB"12" "Ancylidae______ "1" 5__ Pg. XXj 1.51,52,63,64,65 ffJ/C"13" "Limnephilidae "7" ~47T _Sight ID_________ZZZI _CRB

.Comments: Ephemerellidae II 1s the genus Serratella, 12 is the genusEurylopheTla. The limpet (Ancylidae) is probably Ferrissia sp.___

References listed on last page of appendix.

flR30i158

Page 125: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-7Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon1 Simuliidae2 Heptageniidae3 Peltoperlidae

_ 4 Hydropsychldae5" ~Ephemerellidae~n6 Baetidae7 Tipulidae8 Chlronomldae9 Limnichidae10 Ephemera! Hdae tZ11" El mi dae (Larva)11 El mi dae (Adult)12 Aeshnidae13 Brachycentrldae14 Llmnephllldae15' Rhyacophilidae16" "Odontoceri dae ____

*267""4"13"23"2"~r~r~i~I1!~r"2"I8I"6"

Source114,74,74,774,711777374,74,74

Couplet SequenceSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDSight IDPg. 132: 1,2', 3'Sight IDSight IDPg. 259: I'.Z'.A'iS.s./'.S'.g1Sight ID

Det.CRB"CRB~"CRB~"CRB~"CRB~"CRB""CRB~"CRB""CRB~"CRB~"CRB""CRB""CRB""CRB""CRB""CRB""CRB"

Comments: Ephemerellidae il is the genus Serratella, 12 is the genusEury1opheTla.___________________________________

References listed on last page of appendix.

159

Page 126: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS: i

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-7Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA ;

TN Taxon1 Peltoperlldae2 Leptophleblldae

~~3~ "Ephemerellidae W~4 Ephemerellidae 115" "Hydropsy ch1 dae6 Ephemerldae7 Ti pull dae8 Chlronomidae9 Sphaerlldae10 Perl odi dae11_ _0dontocer1dae ___"12" "Cal amoceri dae"13" "L1mneph1 1 1 dae ———

1 Source1 Couplet Sequence13 4,7 Sight ID1 4,7 Sight ID22 7 Sight ID8 7 Sight ID4 4,7 Sight ID1 4,7 Sight ID8 1 Sight ID7 1 Sight ID1 5 Sight ID3 4,7 Sight ID3 4,7 Sight ID2 4,7 Sight ID7 4,7 Sight ID

Det,CRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRBCRB

!'

i• •

1! i

' " '

Comments: Ephemerellidae II Is the genus Serratella, 12 1s the genusEury 1 opheTl a.___________________________________________L

'References listed on last page of appendix.

N60

Page 127: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-9Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon i Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Ephemerellidae II 16 7 Sight ID _____________ CRB"*-»~ "~^ « * • f —— IW MM ""• ««»»—— —— —— • I . ... M l ll.ll —— ._ .M __ ——» M 11"™2 Corydalidae3 Simuliidae4 Pel toper 11 dae5 Hydropsy chl dae6 Annelida7 Philopotamidae8 Baetldae9 ChironomidaeTo Nemouridae11 Perl odl dae1Z Odontoceridae13 Physidae14 Leptophleb-hdae15 Acarl16 Pupa (Tri choptera)"17" "HydroptlHdae

3"3" '77"1" '"5" ""2" "16' "2"'25"1 •"1"-4 "2"1" '

7 Sight ID1 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID5 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID1 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID5 Sight ID4,7 Sight ID5 Sight ID74 Pg. 259: r.2,31

"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB"CRB

Comments: Ephemerellidae il is the genus Serratella, 12 1s the genusEurylopheTla. The water mites appear to represent three families:Lebertiidae, Torrentlcolldae and Sperchonidae. Two of theses appearto be Torrenticol ids, with one of then evidently an immature form.

References listed on last page of appendix.

38301161

Page 128: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-9Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon i Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 EphemerelHdae II 8 7 Sight ID_____________ CRB

~"2" "Ephemerellldae 12"" TO" "~7—— "Sight ID ~" "CRB~~~3~ "T1pulldae_____~~ 4" "1—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"~~4" "Peltoperlidae "" "3" "~477~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"~"5" "Simuliidae "4" ""1 ~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"~"6~ "Perildae "1" ""477"" "Sight ID —— "CRB"~"7~ "ChlrononHdae "" 17" ~~1"" "Sight ID —— "CRB~~8" "Leptophleblldae "" 4" ~~477~~ "Sight ID —— "CRB~~9~ "Baetldae —— "1" ~4,7~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"TO" "Heptagen 11 dae "6" 4,7 "Sight ID_____________ "CRB"11" "Lest i dae "2" ~~4,7~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"12" "HydropsyclHdae "" "1" "~4,7~~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"13" "Corydalldae ——— "1" ""7 ~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"14" "Physldae "1" ""5—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"15" "Perlod1 dae ~ "2" ~47T_2 "Sight ID —— "CRB"16" "Taenioptengydae "7" 4__ Pg. 188: l',Z',4t5' "CRB"17" ~L1mnephnidae__~"~ T6" ~~477~"~ Sight ID______ " "CRB"18" "Limnichidae 1" ~"7 "" "Sight ID —— "CRB"19" "Annelida "1" ~~5—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"20" "AcaH "1" ~5—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"21" "Sphaer dae "" "2" "~5—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"22" "Capniidae "2" ~4| "Sight ID —— "CRB"23" "Nemouridae "1" 4 Pg. 188: I',2',3,4,5 "CRB"24" "Polycentropodldae "1" 4 Pg. 259: 1>,2',4>,5,6>,10<,11',T2

Comments: Ephemeral11dae II Is the genus Serratella, §2 Is the genusEurylopheTla. The Water mite could not be Identified to family, butmay be an Immature Pachygnathldae.____________________

'References listed on last page of appendix.

162

Page 129: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-11Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon I Source1 Couplet Sequence Det1 Tipulidae______ 16 7 Sight ID______________ CRB

~2~ "Hydropsychidae 3~ ~~7—— "Sight ID —— "CRB""~3~ "Heptageniidae___ "3" ~~1 "Sight ID —— "CRB'~~4~ "Physidae "7" ~~477~~ "Sight ID —— ~CRB'"~5~ "Planariidae "7" ~4,7~ "Sight ID —— ~CRB'6~ "LeptophlebiTHai "1" 5__ "Sight ID______________ ~CRB'7~ "Chironomidae —— "5" ~~477"~ "Sight ID —— ~CRB"8~ "Talitridae "2" ~"4,7~ "Sight ID —— "CRB'9" "Hirudinea 16" ""!• "" "Sight ID —— ~CRB'

"Eggs ^————- 2~ ~~477~~" "Sight ID "" "—'

Comments:_Water and eggs froa this sample were collected and maintainedin water." Hydra appeared in the water sample a few days later, apparently,but not definitively, front the eggs. All Ephemeroptera specimens in poorcondition. Philopotamid has conspicuous anal papillae.

'References listed on last page of appendix.

Q R 3 0 J 1 6 3

Page 130: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-11Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon i Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Heptagen11dae___ 1 4,7 Sight ID_____________ CRB

""2" "Leptophleblldae—— "3" ~~4,7"~ "Sight ID — "CRB"~~3~ "Ch1ronom1dae —— 52" ""1 "~ "Sight ID — "CRB"~4~ "Physldae 2" ~5—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"5" "Hydropsychldae T6~ 477 "Sight ID____________ "CRB"

~~6" "Phllopotamldae——— 1" ""4,7"" "Sight ID —— "CRB"~~7" "TalitHdae ——— "2" ~~5 ~~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"""8" "Planar11dae "" Z4~ ""5—— "Sight ID —— "CRB"""9" "Phryganeldae ~ 1" —477— "sight ID —— "CRB""TO" "Pupa ____~~H ~1~ II_Z I _ _ _ _ _ — "CRB""ii" "Eggs "" nnm znzzzuzzzizzziii ~"~"

Comments: Best guess for pupa 1s Ichneumonldae or Braconidae (Hymenoptera)Will neeoTa good key to Insect pupae to properly Identify.________

References listed on last page of appendix.

/1R30I

Page 131: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-13Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon I Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 SphaeHidae____ 4 5 Sight ID_____________ CRB

~2~ """Capniidae ~1~ ~47T "Sight ID —— "CRB"_3~ _Chironomidae "1" 1__ "Sight ID_____________ "CRB"4" Ephemerellidae *l 1" 7__ "Sight ID_____________ "CRB"

~5~ "Annelida_____~ "1" ~5—— "Sight ID —— UJ/CRB

Comments: Ephemerellidae #1 is genus Serratella.

References listed on last page of appendix.A-16

flR30J165

Page 132: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-13Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon f Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Phryganeldae___ 1 4,7 Sight ID_____________ CRB

~~2~ ""Turbellarla "2" ~5 ~~ ~S1ght ID —— ~CRB~"3"" "~Ch1ronom1dae "4" ~~1—— "Sight ID — "CRB"~~4~ ~Hydropsych1 dae—— "1~ ~"477~~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"~5~ ~~Sphaer11dae__~~ Tl~ ~"5 ~~ "Sight ID —— "CRB"Z6I ""Crustacea _1~ ""1—— "Sight ID —— ffJ/CRB

Comments:

'References listed on last page of appendix.

•flR30l166

Page 133: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

. Site Name: Butz Sample: RR-15Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon t Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Ephemerellidae # 2 1 7 Sight ID_____________ CRB

~2~ "Ephemerellidae #1~ "7" 7 "Sight ID —— "CRB"3" "Baetidae_______ "1" 7__ Pg. 97: I'.Z'./'.B'.ll'.lZ',

— - - ——————— - - — —— 13' ,15' ,16 CRB4 Heptageniidae___ 2 4,7 Pg. 97: I1,2',7',8',II1,12 "CRB"

~5" "Hydropsychldae "4" ~~4,7~ Sight ID__________—— "CRB"~6~ "Corydalldae ——— "1" ~"7 "" "Sight ID _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __"""" "CRB"7" "Rhyacophi 11355 "3" 4__ Pg. 259: I'.Z' '.s.e./'.B'.s "CRB"

~"8~ "Ph11 opotamjdae——— "2" ~~477~~ Pg. 259: 1',2',4',5,6',10__~ "CRB""9" "Peltoper! 1 dae ——— "3" ~~4,7~~ Sight ID__________——— "CRB""10" "Perildae_______ "3" """4 "" Pg. 188: I' '.S' '.S' — "CRB""11" "Perlod1 dae "2" ~"4—— Pg. 188: I'.Z'.a'.y'.S1 "CRB""12" "Capniidae "2" ~~"477"" Pg. 188: l',2',3,4',6 "CRB""13" "Chironomidae ~" "7" ~"1 "" Sight ID_______~"~~~~ "CRB""14" "tipulidae "1" ~"1—— "Sight ID ~~ "CRB""15" "Limnichidae "1" 7__ Pg. 364: I1,Z1,10,14',16',19, ~" "" —————-- — —— 22',24,25,26 CRB16 Elmidae_______ 1 7 Pg 364: I1,2',10,14',16'.19', " ~" "" ————————-- — —— 22',24,25' CRB17 Talitridae______ 1 5 Sight ID______________ " ~

Comments: Ephemerellidae II is the genus Serratella, 12 1s the genusEurylopheTla. One of the Phllopotamlds 1s an adult (Source 3, pg 581:I1,2,3) .____________________________________

'References listed on last page of appendix.

SR30I167

Page 134: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

BENTHIC SAMPLE ORGANISMS

Site Name: Butz Sample: CPOM-15Township: Jackson Sample Date: Feb 13 & 14, 1991County: Monroe State: PA

TN Taxon I Source1 Couplet Sequence Det.1 Gomphidae______ 1 4 Pg. 98: 1,2____________ CRB

~"2" "Leptophlebiidae—— TO" ~~477"~ Sight ID — "CRB"~"3" "Peltoper! idae —— 1" ~~4,7"~ "Sight ID —— "CRB""~4" "Chironomidae T2~ ~"1 ~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"~5~ "Heptageniidae 1" ~~477~~ "Sight ID — "CRB"""6" "Ephemerellldae 12 "6" ~~"7 ~" "Sight ID —— "CRB"""7" "Perlodidae_____~~ "1" ""477 " "Sight ID —— "CRB"~8~ "Asellidae "4" ""5 "" Fg. 467: 1,2 " "CRB"9" "Ephemerellldae #1 "8" 7__ Sight ID______________ "CRB"

"TO" "CapnUdae_____~" "6" ~"477 ~ "Sight ID —— "CRB""11" "Hebridae "1" "~7_~~ Pg. 233: I1,2',10',11',13',14 "CRB""12" Tipulidae "1" ""1—— Sight ID_______________~ "CRB""13" "Sciaridae "1" ~"1—— "Sight ID —— "CRB""14" "Elmidae 14" ""7"~~~ "Sight ID —— "CRB""15" "Perlidae" 1" 477 "Sight ID "— "CRB""16" "Limnephilldae "6" 4__ Fg. 259: I'.Z' '.S'.IS'.W, "- -- ————__ — —— IS',16',17',19',20',21'____ CRB17 Leptoceridae____ 1 4 Pg. 259: I1,2',4_____ "CRB"

"18" "Crustacea "1" ~5—— _________ —— "CRB""19" "Rhyacophiitdae "1" __477H sight ID "CRB"

Comments: Leptocerld not In case. The heartpteran Is a nymph. TheRhyacophllld specimen was 1n poor condition. Ephemerellldae II 1sthe genus Serratella, 12 Is the genus Eurylophella. _________

References listed on last page of appendix.

AR30I168

Page 135: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

oReferences Cited

1. MacAlpine, J.F., B.V. Peterson, G.E. Shewell, H.J. Teskey, J.R. Vockeroth,and D.M. Wood. 1981 - 1987. Manual of Nearctic Diptera, Vol. I.Monographs No. 27. Research Branch, Agricultural Canada, 674 pp. (1981).Vol. II, Monograph No, 28. Research Branch, Agricultural Canada, pp. 675- 1332 (1987).

2. Peterson, A. 1960. Larvae of Insects, part II. Ohio State University,Columbus, Ohio. 416 pp.

3. Borror, D.J., C.A. Triplehorn, and N.F. Johnson. 1989. Introduction to thestudy of Insects, sixth edition. Saunders College Publishing,Philadelphia. 875 pp.

4. Stehr, F.W. 1987. Immature Insects, Vol. I. Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.754 pp.

5. Pennak, R.W. 1989. Fresh Water Invertebrates of the United States. JohnWiley and Sons, New York. 628 pp.

6. Eddy, S. and A.C. Hodson. 1982. Taxonomic Keys of the Common Animals ofthe North Central States. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis,M1nn. 205 pp.

7. Merritt, R.W. and K.W. Cummins. 1984. An Introduction to the AquaticInsects of North America. Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company, Oubuque, IA.722 pp.

8. Conant, R. 1975. A field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians. HoughtonMiffHn Company, Boston, MA. 429 pp.

9. Emerson, W.K. and M.K. Jacobson. 1976. American Museum of Natural HistoryGuide to Shells. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. New York.

SR301 169

Page 136: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

Page 137: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

QA/QC SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLES

Site Name: BUTZ LANDFILL Date: May 24, 1991Location: Monroe Co., PA Determiner: DJ

Taxon1. Limnephilidae2. Desmognathus sp.3. Sphaeriidae4. Chlronomldae5. Chlronomldae6. Hydropsy chldae7. Baetldae8. Dytlscldae9. Ephemerel l f dae10. Baetldae11. _EphemerelHdae __12. Odontoceridae13. "Lepi dost omati Hie14. "Peril dae15. CyprlnldaeQA/QC Comments:

V1al 1 Source1 CommentsRR-02-18 4RR-02-01 Sight ID

CPOM-13-05 5CPOM-07-08 7RR-02-09 Sight ID

CPOM-04-04 4CPOM-05-05 4C POM- 03- 12 4RR-09-01 4

CPOM-09-09 Sight IDCPON-09-OZ sight ID Later stage of development

~ -compared to RR-09-01RR-09-13 4 ~ ———RR-OZ-17 4

CPOM-15-15 4 Missing part of abdomenCPOM-05-10 Sight ID Black-nose Dace

VerYes

-Yes-Yes-Yes"Yes"Yes-Yes"Yes-YesYes-Yes

-Yes-Yes-Yes'-Yes'

Sources are listed at the end of the Benthic Sample Organisms appendix(Appendix XX).

171

Page 138: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

QA/QC SHEET FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE SAMPLES

Site Name: BUTZ LANDFILL Date: May 24, 1991Location: Monroe Co., PA Determiner: DJ

Taxon16. Heptageniidae17. Chlronomldae18. Ephemerel 1 1 dae19. tl pull dae20. Phllopotamldae21. Tipulidae22. T1 pull dae23. Limnephll {dae24. "Hydropsy ch1 dae25. Hydropsy chl dae2e. Corydalidae

V1al 1 Source CommentsRR-04-09 4RR-07-08 Sight IDRR-03-07 Sight ID

CPOM-05-01 7RR-11-09 4RR-11-10 Sight ID

CPOM-02-01 Sight IDCPOM-09-17 4RR-OZ-OZ Sfg'ht IDRR-09-02 Sight ID

CPOM-09-13 4

Ver.YesYes-YesYesYes'YesYesYesYesYesYes

QA/QC Comments:

Sources are listed at the end of the Benthic Sample Organisms appendix(Appendix XX).

172

Page 139: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

73

Page 140: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

Page 141: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

;TEST pit

68301175

Page 142: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TKI'RA TECH, INCTEST PIT LOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-1EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: Guardian

SAMPLE TYPE: Solid Waste/Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 10'BACKFILL TYPE: Same as Sample TypeGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 3, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 10"

LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Typical waste found - At 6' depth appears soil cap rolled over garbage - 200 ppm with microtip, but noconfidence in microtip.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-22-44-66-88-9

FIELD DATA( ) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Solid Waste

Solid WasteSolid WasteWaste/Soil MixNative Soil

TETRA TECH, INC !• ' TEST PIT' LOG' -•'• .'." :" '-v ; • •

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-2

EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Solid Waste/Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: ff-TBACKFILL TYPE: Same as Sample TypeGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03

DATE COMPLETED: December 3, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: T-8'LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Two S-gallon cans found, 1 empty/crushed, 1 full of solids.450 ppm with MicroTip on open trench @ 5' depth.DEPTH. . -v:::t:'; .

INTERVAL/ "'•::,':•: .•(feet).-. :;"..::':' ••1-2

2-33-4

4-56-77-8

^ SlI' lE 'lJATA ::''•,'•.":•'•;' •'• '•.'"••' •'; ;'"';/. / ' pj'1: ••v'; ••':"'' ' /; •'' '' '•'

350 ppm420 ppm450 ppm

'.- •V::T:>;':- ;' DESCRIPTIO1* OF MATERIAL ' ;' • •

Solid WasteSolid Waste, 5-gaL can (crushed)Solid Waste, 5-gaL can solidsSolid WasteNative Soil/Garbage MixNative Soil

176

Page 143: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTEST PIT LOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-3EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: NA

SAMPLE DEPTH: None Collected*BACKFILL TYPE: Solid Waste/Native SoilGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 ||

DATE COMPLETED: December 4, 1990 PEXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe |

SURFACE DIMENSION: 2txlO> J

TOTAL DEPTH: 15' JLOGGED BY: M Mobile fREFERENCE: Surface Grade ||

REMARKS: * Solid waste to 15* - Native soil not encountered; no sample collected.**Heavy rain - MicroTip and HNU inoperable. ||

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-0.50.5-15

FIELD DATA( )

No odors**No odors**

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoUSolid Waste

: '.. ' TETRA TECH, INC . . : HITEST PIT LOG l|

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-4

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 8'

BACKFILL TYPE: Solid Waste/Native SoilGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not EncounteredREMARKS:

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-22-44-66-8

, FIELD DATA7: -:- v/' f:: -::: ; . ' . . . *;\. ,

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 1DATE COMPLETED: December 3, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2*10'TOTAL DEPTH: 8'LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Solid WasteSolid WasteSolid Waste/Native Soil MixNative SoU A

1A R 3 Q I 1 1 1

Page 144: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTEST PIT LOG

PROJECT: Bute LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-5

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 8'-9'

BACKFILL TYPE: Solid Waste/Native SoilGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03

DATE COMPLETED: December 3, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2"xlff

TOTAL DEPTH: 9'LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS:

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-22-44-6

6-88-9

FIELD DATADESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Solid WasteSolid WasteSolid WasteSolid Waste/Native Soil Mix

Native Soil

TETRA.TECH INC..-,.'. '..-,;..•'.-.: ;--:v.'TESTPITLOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-6EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/ASAMPLE DEPTH: None CollectedBACKFILL TYPE: Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Possible Hit

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 3, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 14'LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Trench excavated to extent of backhoe - Solid waste found throughout test pit; refilled, no sample.

DEPTH

(feet) ;0-14

:"" "',• '.':',• .'.''. ••• '•/:'' •/',': •;:... * ' ' •'• ':>:.',,. .. .,.. •...., . £.'..,, . ... J : .,.. • BJ :? SSS EklAL

Solid Waste (assorted)

AR30I178

Page 145: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INC jTEST PIT LOG ||

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-7

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 3'BACKFILL TYPE: Same as Sample Type

GROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 ^

DATE COMPLETED: December 3, 1990 fffEXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2"xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 3'LOGGED BY: M. Nobile—————————————————————————————————REFERENCE: Surface Grade

itREMARKS: Hoe refusal at 3' due to apparent limestone bed.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-11-22-3

FIELD DATA( ) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoilLarge Stones |Umestone(?) Bedrock j|

•TETRA TECH, INC ; 41TESTPJTLOCJ J|

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-8

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 4'

BACKFILL TYPE: Topsoil, Rocks and SoilGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 |DATE COMPLETED: December 4, 1990 ||EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe |SURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'

TOTAL DEPTH: 4'LOGGED BY: M. NobUeREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Hoe refusal at 4' due to large rock, apparent native material

DEPTH' /->»&INTERVAL: ':/:-<>

(feet)' ••••:0-1

2-4

••Vf :":::';:-'fmJ>-DA A:' " .••$ -\ -$' }-•-- • " DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top Soil/RocksSoils/Large Stone

1

1

Page 146: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTESTPITLOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-9EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/ASAMPLE DEPTH: No Sample TakenBACKFILL TYPE: Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03

DATE COMPLETED: December 4,1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO*

TOTAL DEPTH: 16'LOGGED BY: M. Nobile

REFERENCE: Surface GradeREMARKS: Garbage observed throughout test pit for maximum extent of hoe.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-12-16

FIELD DATA( ) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

SoilSoild Waste

• , ,: '• TETRA TECH> INC ' ••••:,.:-''"' ;.. • • ' " . •TEST PIT LOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-10EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: Guardian

SAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 13'BACKFILL TYPE: Top Soil, Solid Waste & Native SoilGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: Decembers,1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2-xlO"TOTAL DEPTH: 13'

LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS:

DEPTH''. -*v;-«feINTERVAL::"?'.:;!;;;:;

(fisef):::--;':'-;—>0-0.80.8-12

12

ESE EEL '5M«Vt ..\':.' :''•S':m: ;•"•(;••«• -r-' •. \ ' .•:•:•:.••.;••:..•• .,.

. • - • •• : -.- I".' '• •• / .. . . . , • s DESCRIPT1OH OF MATERIALTop SoilSolid WasteNative Soil

flR30li80

Page 147: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INC IITESTPITLOG .|

PROJECT: ButzLandfiUTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-11EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: Guardian

SAMPLE TYPE: N/ASAMPLE DEPTH: None TakenBACKFILL TYPE: Solid Waste and Miscellaneous FillGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 J[

DATE COMPLETED: December 4, 1990 (||EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe "~]|SURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO' ||TOTAL DEPTH: 16' ||

LOGGED BY: M. Nobile |REFERENCE: Surface Grade |

REMARKS: Crushed 35-gallon drum retrieved at 16' depth, no markings. Newspaper from August 1972 observed.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-12-16

FIELD DATA( ) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoUSolid Waste |

TETRA TECH, INC gTESTPITLOG H

PROJECT: ButzLandfiUTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-12

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/A

SAMPLE DEPTH: N/ABACKFILL TYPE: Miscellaneous Fill and Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 |

DATE COMPLETED: December 5, 1990 IEXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe |SURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlff

TOTAL DEPTH: ITLOGGED BY: M. NobUeREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: No sample collected, nighty compacted. Abundant steel debris (i.e., tire rims, car pieces, with alternatingthin fill layers).

DEPTH • • '- ':;,v:INTERVAL, ,

(feet)0-0.8

0.8-17

•j'Sr' 'FIELD: DATA ••'•«>";..- = ,'fi^:..^-.. :>;:•'•' , • , , ... ' , . .

> ' - • • • • ' • ' • , ; • • ' ' ' ' . . »

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Fill Material/CoverSolid Waste

I1

AR30!181

Page 148: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTEST PIT LOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-13EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: Guardian

SAMPLE TYPE: N/A'SAMPLE DEPTH: N/A

BACKFILL TYPE: Top Soil and Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 5, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2-xlO"

TOTAL DEPTH: 18'LOGGED BY: M. Nobile

REFERENCE: Surface GradeREMARKS: No sample collected.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-11-18

FIELD DATA( )

No Odors

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoUSolid Waste

TETRA TECH, INCTESTPITLOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-14EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/ASAMPLE DEPTH: N/ABACKFILL TYPE: Top Soil and Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 5, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO*TOTAL DEPTH: 16'

LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: 18" Seam of reddish-brown soil at depth of 24"; also apparent raw sewage at depth of 8'.

DEPTH' • :'-:.:::'::-;vINTERVAL,-;;-:': '

• (feet). ••'""•'' -v

0-11-2

2-4

4-16

::':4l'?'S; FIELD' DATA' • £v/I:/;-:: •<.•::;; f,v : •• } ':• > -• ' " ' DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL '

Top SoilSolid WasteReddish-Brown Soil SeamSolid Waste

Page 149: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INC ITESTPITLOG ||

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-15

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/ASAMPLE DEPTH: N/A

BACKFILL TYPE: Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 m[————————————————— «nDATE COMPLETED: December 5, 1990 tK

EXCAVATION METHOD: BacknoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'

TOTAL DEPTH: 18'-20'

LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: No sample.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-11-20

FIELD DATA( ) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoUSolid Waste

TETRA TECH,INC HTESTPITLOG Wl

PROJECT: Butz Landfill

TEST PIT LOCATION: TP-16EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE:

SAMPLE DEPTH: 8'BACKFILL TYPE: Top Soil and Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 4, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2 lffTOTAL DEPTH: 8'

LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS:

DEPTH ;INTERVAL

(feet)

0-11-77-8

FIELPDATAV'- *!-"":- '>••••••••• -• b DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoUSolid WasteNative Soil

<l

AR30I183

Page 150: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTESTPITLOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-17EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native Soil/ClaySAMPLE DEPTH: 14'

BACKFILL TYPE: Top Soil, Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 6, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'

TOTAL DEPTH: 14'

LOGGED BY: M. Nobile

REFERENCE: Surface GradeREMARKS:

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-11-13.513.5-14

FIELD DATADESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoUSolid WasteNative SoU

TETRA TECH, INCTESTPITLOG

PROJECT: Butz Landfill

TEST PIT LOCATION: TP-18EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Apparent Native MaterialSAMPLE DEPTH: 18'BACKFILL TYPE: Surface Soil Fill, Solid Waste (car

partsGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03

DATE COMPLETED: December 4, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 18'

LOGGED BY: M. Nobile

REFERENCE: Surface GradeREMARKS:

DEPTKtH lll?INTER VA&:t''S:'

• (feet) '•'*••••"'"

0-0.8

0.8-18

18

|i|S|yl:;:;: • ' ' • • • • ' , ' , " ' v ••'!'" :'' ••• ' ''':''''- ''' ' ' • ! ' ' ' '• ," ••' ' •''::''>S*t: • ''•'',: •'*' •:.,',,. '.'....' .' , .-, • "'; ': :-

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALTop SoilSolid Waste, Abundant Car PartsThin Layer of Rocky Soil

HR30I\Bk

Page 151: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INC 1TEST PIT LOG |(

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-19

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Suspected Raw SewageSAMPLE DEPTH: 6'

BACKFILL TYPE: Soil Fill and Suspect SewageGROUND WATER DEPTH: NotEncountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 ^DATE COMPLETED: December 4, 1990 ]J

EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe |SURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO* ||TOTAL DEPTH: 6' ||LOGGED BY: M. Nobile ||

REFERENCE: Surface Grade |REMARKS: |

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-22-44-6

FIELD DATADESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL ||

Top SoilDark Organic Layer (suspected sewage)Stone, Slate, Soil

TETRA TECH, INC MUTESTPITLOG Q

PROJECT: ButzLandffllTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-19AEXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 6'BACKFILL TYPE: Native Soil and StonesGROUND WATER DEPTH: NotEncountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 1DATE COMPLETED: December 4, 1990 1EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 6'LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: No notable garbage. |This pit excavated to obtain "native material" sample at depth. 19A Trench located adjacent to 19.Only small seam of (suspected) raw sewage observed at depth of 12"- 18".

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-12-6

','.,,,'. ;,,',•'•';, •'',;",•

•••'.• "/•"""•'". *\.sy-,:,: -"• •- DESCRIFnOfl OF MATERIALTop SoilSoils and Stone

<1

185

Page 152: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTEST PIT LOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-20EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 6'

BACKFILL TYPE: Soil Fill and Suspected SewageGROUND WATER DEPTH: NotEncountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 6, 1990

EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 6'

LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Seam of raw sewage (suspected) found at 12" below grade. Appears to be same material as in TP-19.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-11-22-6

FIELD DATA( ) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Soil FillRaw SewageNative Soil

TETRA TECH, INCTESTPJTLOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-21EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/A

SAMPLE DEPTH: N/ABACKFILL TYPE: Soil Fill and Solid WasteGROUND WATER DEPTH: NotEncountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03

DATE COMPLETED: December 5, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 16' - ITLOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Heaviest concentration of fabric strands found in this test pit This would appear to explain low spotadjacent to road. Fabric strands only consistent find throughout site. Each test pit (except 7, 8, 19, 19A) containedvaried amounts of this material

DEPTH '.":i:«f:vINTERVAL

(feet)0-11-16

•':il: {''.'•• -EiEto-DArA'--'-.,..1: .':,;'"• •.:•. r'- > , *• DESCRIPTION OF MATER1AE

Wet ClaySolid Waste

Page 153: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTEST PIT LOG |

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-22EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: Guardian

SAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 18' +

BACKFILL TYPE: Soil Fill and Solid Waste

GROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 jl

DATE COMPLETED: December 6, 1990 HIEXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe ~]|

SURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO"

TOTAL DEPTH: 18'+

LOGGED BY: M NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Two open-top crushed drums found - apparent trash burners, no markings, crushed debris inside. Emptystacked sacks of fly ash and salt uncovered (empty).

Sample taken at max. Extent of hoe reach, appears to be native material

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-11-17+18

FIELD DATA( ) DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

SoU/CoverMunicipal WasteNative Clay

TETRA TECH, INC UlTESTPITLOG J

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-23EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Native SoilSAMPLE DEPTH: 4'BACKFILL TYPE: N/A

GROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 I

DATE COMPLETED: December 6, 1990 jEXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 4'LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS:1

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-4

/;a' "'/'FIELD- DAm , ••••• • • • • • • • • ' • • : t • • • • > ' . ' • • • > . • DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Native Soil to Bedrock

----- - - - ———————————————— nfld1187

Page 154: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INCTEST PIT LOO

PROJECT: Butz LandfillTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-24EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Soil (appears native)SAMPLE DEPTH: 8*

BACKFILL TYPE: Soil Fill, Suspected SewageGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 6, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'

TOTAL DEPTH: 8'LOGGED BY: M. Nobfle

REFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Waste sludge seam at 18" depth, 6" thick, greyish discoloration to 7' depth. Discolored soils alsocollected hi sample.

DEPTHINTERVAL

(feet)0-1.5

1.5-2.02-77-8

FIELD DATA( )

HNU at 5PPM (Max reading)

DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL

Top SoilSewage SeamGrey DiscolorationSofl - Native Appearance

'.....'•••...•• • TETRA TECH, INCTESTprFLOG . - " : v ,>;>>"' ..,•;'•'.; 'PROJECT: ButzLandflUTEST PIT LOCATION: TP-25EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: Solid WasteSAMPLE DEPTH: 6'BACKFILL TYPE: Same as Sample TypeGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03DATE COMPLETED: December 6, 1990EXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2'xlO'TOTAL DEPTH: 6'LOGGED BY: M. NobfleREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: No sludge observed.DEFm jM::

INIERVAElUS -(feet}'::r'4Wv0-6'

'"'• ' '•''•' '• ';':•','''''' ," : • fft t'yt.-' f\. 'fc A TT* A. ' ' . .'.• ^ • . ifJj jjk'IJAjiAi:: , . ,..'."..!|:r.; :•.:;;:;! i-v-..:;.;:.;,.:-...'-*;;;.; •••• J-;-:. •••..-..•• DESCRffTKM Q£ MATERIAL

Soil/Clay Mix

188

Page 155: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH, INC IITEST PIT LOG

PROJECT: Butz Landfill' TEST PIT LOCATION: TP-30

EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/ASAMPLE DEPTH: N/A

BACKFILL TYPE: Misc. fill, stones, and waste sludge.GROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 £tLDATE COMPLETED: December 7, 1990 WlEXCAVATION METHOD: BackhoeSURFACE DIMENSION: 2tLV

TOTAL DEPTH: 6'LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: Backfill/native soils to 4', apparent 24" sewage sludge resting on bedrock.DEPTH

INTERVAL(feet)0-4

4-6

FIELD DATA( > DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL |

Fill Material/Stones jjWaste Sludge to Bedrock (20" sludge seam) |

TETRA TECH, INC JLTESTPFTLOG f|

PROJECT: Butz Landfill

TEST PIT LOCATION: TP-31EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR: GuardianSAMPLE TYPE: N/ASAMPLE DEPTH: N/ABACKFILL TYPE: N/AGROUND WATER DEPTH: Not Encountered

PROJECT NUMBER: 4204-03 TDATE COMPLETED: December 7, 1990 |EXCAVATION METHOD: Backhoe |SURFACE DIMENSION: 2-xlff |TOTAL DEPTH: 4'

LOGGED BY: M. NobileREFERENCE: Surface Grade

REMARKS: 2' black soil in area with trees and heavy brush.DEPTH

INTERVAL,' •.:*:(feet)0-2

2-4

••• FIELD DATA '"•'"'"•: ""•'•.-:•£-- > ' "•'. - L DESCRIPTION OFMATERIAL

Black Top SoilNative Material

89

Page 156: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BORING £06S:

flRSOi i

Page 157: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH INC. - BORING LOS SHEET: 1 OF

PROJECT: Butz Landfill PROJECT NO. T4204-03BORING DESIGNATION: BL-BOR-01 DATE(S) DRILLED: 12/03/90DRILLING CONTRACTOR; Walton Drilling Corp. DRILLING METHOD: SPTBORING DIAMETER: 6" SAMPLING INTERVAL: 2.0'SAMPLING METHOD; Split Spoon TOTAL DEPTH: 12.0'LOGGED BY: R. H. BoedekerGROUT TYPE: NA GROUT METHOD: NASTATIC WATER DEPTH: No ground water encountered REFERENCE: Surface GradeDATE: 12/03/90

REMARKS:

LITHOLOGICINTERVAL

SAMPLEINTERVAL SPOOK BLOWS RECOVERY

CLASSIFICATION:OF MATERIAL

0.0-1.0 0.0-2.0 3-4-2-1 Soil Cap1.0- 2.0-4.0 1-1-1-1 Solid waste

4.0-6.0 12-8-9-2 Solid waste6.0-8.0 4-2-2-2 10" Solid waste

10.5 8.0-10.0 18-35-35-60 Weathered shales

AUGER REFUSAL 9 11.2'

Page 158: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH INC. - BORING LOG SHEET: I OF

PROJECT: Butz Landfill PROJECT NO. T4204-03BORING DESIGNATION: BL-BOR-02 DATE(S) DRILLED: 12/04/90DRILLING CONTRACTOR; Walton Drilling Corp. DRILLING METHOD: SPTBORING DIAMETER: 6" SAMPLING INTERVAL: 2.0'SAMPLING METHOD; Split Spoon TOTAL DEPTH: 15.0'LOGGED BY: R. H. BoedekerGROUT TYPE: NA GROUT METHOD: NASTATIC WATER DEPTH;_(12.0') trace water REFERENCE: Surface GradeDATE: 12/04/90

REMARKS:

LITHOLOGICINTERVAL

SAMPLEINTERVAL SPOOK BLOWS RECOVERY

CLASSIFICATIONOF MATERIAL

0.0-4.0 0.0-2.0 5-7-7-8 8" Sands and fine gravels2.0-4.0 5-3-2-10 10" Sands and fine gravels

4.0- 4.0-6.0 120/.1" Solid waste (trace roofingmaterial

7.0-9.0- 18-16-21-18 Solid waste9.0-11.0 5-3-2-5 Solid waste

14.8 11.0-13.0 6-15-5-10 Solid waste14.8-15.0 13.0-15.0 25-25-81-48 Full Weathered shales

AUGER REFUSAL 9 13.5'

SR30I192

Page 159: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH INC. - BORING L06 SHEET: 1 OF

PROJECT: Butz Landfill PROJECT NO. T4204-03

BORING DESIGNATION: BL-BOR-03 DATE(S) DRILLED: 12/06/90

DRILLING CONTRACTOR; Walton Drilling Corp. DRILLING METHOD: SPTBORING DIAMETER: 6" SAMPLING INTERVAL: NASAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon TOTAL DEPTH: 15.0'LOGGED BY: R. H. BoedekerGROUT TYPE: NA GROUT METHOD: NASTATIC WATER DEPTH: No water encountered REFERENCE:DATE: 12/06/90

REMARKS: Straight augering to 13.5'. Based on information obtained from nearby testpit.

LITHOLOGICINTERVAL

SAMPLEINTERVAL SPOON BLOWS RECOVERY

CLASSIFICATION*OF MATERIAL

0.0-1.0 Soi1 cap1.0-13.5 Solid waste13.5-15.5 13.5-15.5 21-18-41-100/4" 22" Weathered shales

15.5-15.51 100/0"

AUGER AND SPOON REFUSAL 0 15.5'

flR30i193

Page 160: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH INC. - BORING LOG SHEET: 1 OF

PROJECT: Butz Landfill PROJECT NO. T4204-03BORING DESIGNATION: BL-BOR-04 DATE(S) DRILLED: 12/06/90DRILLING CONTRACTOR; Walton Drilling Corp. DRILLING METHOD: SPTBORING DIAMETER: 6" SAMPLING INTERVAL: NASAMPLING METHOD; Split Spoon TOTAL DEPTH: 15.5'LOGGED BY: R. H. BoedekerGROUT TYPE: NA GROUT METHOD: NASTATIC WATER DEPTH: No water encountered REFERENCE; Surface gradeDATE: 12/06/90

REMARKS: Augered directly to 15.0'. Based on information obtained from nearby testpit.

LITHOLOGICINTERVAL SAMPLEINTERVAL SPOOK BLOWS RECOVERY

CLASSIFICATIONOF MATERIAL

0.0-1.0 Soil cap1.0-15.0 Solid waste (including a large

amount of fabric)______15.0-15.5 15.0-15.5 100/6" Weathered shales (identified b,

auger cuttings)________

Page 161: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TETRA TECH INC. - BORING LOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillBORING DESIGNATION: BL-BOR-05DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Walton Drilling Corp.BORING DIAMETER: 6"SAMPLING METHOD: Split SpoonLOGGED BY: R. H. BoedekerGROUT TYPE: NASTATIC WATER DEPTH: No water encounteredDATE: 12/06/90

SHEET: 1 OF 1

PROJECT NO. T4204-03OATE(S) DRILLED: 12/07/90DRILLING METHOD: SPTSAMPLING INTERVAL: NATOTAL DEPTH: 15.0'

GROUT METHOD: NAREFERENCE: Surface grade

REMARKS: Augered directly to 10.0'. Based on information obtained from nearby testpit.

LITHOLOGICINTERVAL

0.0-10.5

0.0-9.0

9.0-

15.0

SAMPLEINTERVAL

10.5-12.5

13.0-15.0

SPOON BLOWS

30-21-26-53

21-41-35-42

RECOVERY

Full

1.2'

CLASSIFICATION:OF MATERIAL

Augered directly to 10.5'Solid wasteWeathered shalesWeathered shales

AUGER REFUSAL 9 14.0'

Page 162: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

H R 3 Q I 1 9 6

Page 163: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES

CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):

U = Not detected. The associated number indicates approximatesample concentration necessary to be detected.

(NO CODE) = Confirmed identification.

B = Not detected substantially above the level reported inlaboratory or field blanks.

R = Unreliable result. Analyte may or may not be present in thesample. Supporting data necessary to confirm result.

N a Tentative identification. Consider present. Special methodsmay be needed to confirm its present or absence in futuresampling efforts.

CODES RELATED TO QUANTITATION(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitation limits):

J » Analyte present. Reported value may not be accurate orprecise.

K ^ Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actualvalue is expected to be lower.

L = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actualvalue is expected to be higher.

$

UJ * not detected, quantitation may be Inaccurate or imprecise.UL - Not detected, quantitation Unit is probably higher.

OTHER CODES

Q » No analytical result.D * Compound Identified In an analysis at a secondary dilution

factor.X * Additional flags defined separately.

Page 164: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

SURFACE SOIL SAMPLES

Page 165: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo^ iu O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O?s* ss3

•w -C «SO 4J •—OJ O4J Vl_ >01 Oo >l I

o^> • ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooI O OOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC/l LlJ01 U

_ 3us o ~~— OO^^^^OOOOOOC3OC3OOOOOO^ClcaC3caO^^ca__ _ _

i O O O O1/1 cj

o

> CJ

V CO ID•—4 CO U

t/i CJ3•

CJ LO?gC/? UJ(-0 CJ

?sC/) UJ

u

§ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .to to CO CO tO CO CO »*H H — -• >~4 to CO CO '•H C0 CO CO *•* CO « CO CO tO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO * «"M

§000000000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

ooooo 'oooooooooogoooooooo ooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

tOtOtOCDCOCOtO*"*^^— *tOCDcOtO^HtOtOCO-^CD*— tCOCOCOCDCOtOCOUDcOCOCO'^—

000000000000000000000000OO^OOC3OOOOO^OOOOOOOOOOOO

0000

S8SSSS8§SS§§§Sgg§§S§3§SSSSS3§SS§§§

§000000000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooQOooooooooooooo

Ol —» OlX -— Ol X•—. en i ^»— a>- •*£ - 0101 3 01 —• —• •—• -~.—* 01 33'—Ill"3*3 "3 5 ^ ^ «i —»£ "3 ~—

^ •*•* Ol Ol •—• Ol Ol ^ Ol-»--^^OI 3 3 Ol- • - - -— c - » o i-^ — <a 33 5 •=• -^~ —— iO 3 01 .C — - O —— 01

''—• 01 o> qi— qi Q. 0) - — 3 •M5 £ 5 oi oi u c ——. § S x">5-- x—•= 013030 s —~

u t- ** . 'i1 c"en'5lj «33£~~',2."CT ^o i-3-o*3 '3!Z~ !c S~*o i a o o i o > u a . a 3 0 ) X x o o i u- o u 3 u -— o >— X 4 - > x o n u o i o i ° a•Z *T "Z P P P 9 —"— P-"ii ~^b 3 u~ !> = ai>—ej= <- u •£*** a*^~ u •- * -S TE J o!c I'o u i u c

^ H « \ j c s j o o o a - M x - M o a i Q O o o a u u w w » M O p H > i S < 6 S r ~ ^ M v > £ « — '—i i i i a ^ a } * - i N g E E . f l . Q O O O o i u > t x i u u t ) i o ( o c u > i > i"^ - - -I I I CJOJl-l-l-ronJjESjEI: — — •MOI-w'S'oo'ol-Z — —

2 ""5JJ5J « g ~ 3 J!;f ~J 2" " s 15'" 5~3i:^T^S w-w^uiwfj;^;^po*— u C + J O H - a ) 4 - * o a > i p c c ^- - > i » u u f- - • """tjc:c>ta}a)i'-oaj .OQ}it»gfnOa>aiQ).ca>»>4x«*o<u-«.oj:cc-g«.-S = G p p p S -S^--cy = _ i ' T _

5R30!199

Page 166: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o<D

—. r~- 10 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O~ oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

§000000000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

TS g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g i g g g g g g g g gI "*

ll TS g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g gCO LU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

_ -- - . tOiacOLOCOCOtOCOmenrOlOCOlOrOtOlDtOCOLOt'OCPtOCOtncOiniOCOIOlOtOC'IC'OCO i ""* "~« -« —« -H —4 -H __ ——

N) Ic 4-i— 30)

CD •—v u

i Oin LUCO U

CO LUCO (_)

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

*-)

J <=>£ g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g-t~ If* 111 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

01 u cn cn oi oiw: ->»es^^^^o 01-». ^01 — - 01 oi3 013 ai3 x : o i— m— ~^^-»»ci 3 3 013 a i 3 ~ ^ ^ c <s — *. C o i o i a i a — — • ^ — • c — 01 ^ aj a. cn — ..

0) -U 0) 3 3 3 ——u c >—«— — • vo<a Q) c— • c — 01 ^ aj a. cn

•-« — ~ 10 3 Ol £ —— O i^ ——oi 3 oi .e —- o0) *—•—• 3 4-» Ol U '. - -i a o < a Q) c c oi3~a^:oi^ocoi «— • aj a. 01 ^-»j: u .e ai u at c ~— • . o « ^ — — i^-^>^uia^a) 0^.03^01• w o - w c c c i a o i o i c ^ — . uoi^.oioia.ji^.'a a> uoiu— <oi3gjf^a)«SioQ.^'^"(o 4JOidia)O3oi^3"o"^oi— c o 3 o ~ 5 -^o -c o j: -c £ o~»s-»»-'—•—uii 3"ai——»3~^—»u aj 3 u »^ oj «^<— —•<— oi>—

u o t_4-»4-*4-* u OIOIC OlOle «* *—» **~ A ^>^ Ol OB ^'^ OOI£OI£ ^C Q>O(OOOJO)VQ.330)^^OOI t4~OOI 30)^~O '""^4J^OVJO(UO)"O•— u <— o o o o — —• o->s. -«.u 3 u •— 10 c oi—>C-C u oi£»».a)~x— a) — £ 4-1 —~ 4.; j: u u u u __ _ j oi oi_o — c: 3 u o> c ( o u ^ c u o i p o i p c o u i a u

_ _ e 'J' ~ — !c B.C—O! c-S ClSoS S oi—o-S.csi^M O^D'uiujCJrjrjCoo^ uu4jai— o } 4 - * o o j i u c c ^~ » > i » u u £H - c x j h - u < j o o c c : > t a > a > " - o a > jao)«*->EcoO4j<uo)fO)^4X^^o<o, -i— — — — n j i n j i c c - o u - S c c o o o o - 1 ja »— cue i1—.-•-. — — —— 4 J X 4 J O O ) O O 5 O O t . U U U ^ O i — XOlioU'— •— M.C'— —3«nj*JCM|egij2^o_g^o_o i u x ^ u u ^ s i a a c u ^ ^— •cvicMOOOO-ux*-'O ai

Page 167: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

•— cooOO '—a) •—U M-*> 73U- C Ii. as i3 —J IOO

M 01C 4-» •—

m j->•a •«01 0) •—4J i OU 4-> OJ I

IB c iO — I

|» ~X3U 1)

>1 "-

I Oen uJto cj

I OCO UJ

O C 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O C 3 O O O C 3 O a O O O C 5 0 O O Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaoooaooo

m a?

CO UJto O

0)- CO (O

CO UJ •""CO CJ Q.

•o

O COt OCO UJto cj

PO (OO CD

i O

CO CJ

CO UJCO CJ

O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C l O O O O a OO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

o o 0 o o o o o o o c> o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooGO GO CO CO CO CO CO GO CD CO CO CO CO CO CO CH GO (0 9) O) CO CO GO GO GO en CD GO CO CO CO CO CO CO

33333333333333333333333333333333333O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C D O

ooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooCO CO CO CO O 00 CO CO O CO CO CO CO CO CO O CO O CP O CO CO CO CO CO O O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO

O O O OO O O O

§000000000000000000000000000000O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O

o5"" GO. 00 CO GO S GO GO 5._ . •

PO.

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooinisjinunoknu'iunohnunLrikrtkninOLnoooinbnLnhninoou'iLnunbnknLnLnkn

§0000000000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O C 3 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OpocncntnOrorocnOcnrncncoPOroornooorncopornpooornfnfOrnfOcrjropnr^p*»p^^f*»co^^^^^tO^^v^^^*f^«^^or^u^^fitOl^*^**ps»r^^^u^^Dr^f*^f^^*.r^^x.p^.f*»

ro ro ^ *~* rn oo fO PO

3 = 23 = 33a2S = 32323 = = = = = a = = = = = = = = 2 = =ir>2§0000000000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo'ddddddddddoddddodddddoo'dddddddddddoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooCO. COaOCOCnCOCOOQCnCOCOQOGOCOOOCTCO'OCnACOCOOOCOCOCTCncOCOCOGOCOQOOOGO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogoooooO O O O O O O O O O CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C? O O O O 3 O Ooo'oo'ocscDOoocaooo.oocaooooooooocDoocaaoooo

S oooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooooo- oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooooooooLr>mwnLnoLnu^Lnou^mLnu7tr)tnoinoOOini/)kriLnLnoOknvnu^u^i/iu^mLr)

01 01 oi«— — •-» »i^-^->.oia> ajj:333 OlOl«».O1013'-«3— • —~ i> • — .JE-M

c c e ecu w •— " aj cu C"CTC o» d»^ -^ eSi" c"a. 3"« b» cn^ ^: cn *- aj CT cp ^cu cy

•^ ~o "o "o •— *~ cT f=~ "^ +J4Jjzcjzc""OU-*- i >sS*™-cc;i'-O(U<u ^ £ cu o —• o- -- "" ") t^ C C '~ *J U 3 "- 3i__c.ci_>,oooa.a)a.a)'— c o > — oc i —oouo-cui-i-irj^:™^:— nj — •— t- a) ro c -C -c — a)a>><aic>.

t. U a) '*• -~ -~ o O'"-r—— >— oE = c c i - u > , >.c .c a) ai — — - "-

^30/20)

Page 168: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

t. n >3 —I Ioo

N 0)C -W —

CD -u-O US0) 0) "—4-. £ OO 4-» >0) I

CJ

O

?1on LUon cj

! o ooooooooooooooooooeoooooooooc

isI O00 UJ

CM IT)O to

?8

= :3:3=5 = =3 = =>=>=>=>3=>:3=5:3Z3:3=>r>:3r3=J=>3=>:3ri=ig O O O O O O O O O O O O a O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

o333333333333333333333333333333oaoaooooooooooooooooaooooooooooaaoooaooooaoooooooooooooooooogoociooocioooaoooooooociooooooooatnunLnL^uiiOL/)kniDmbnu^LDLDunu^^>L/^u^uibDOLOonwnoDknu^LO

S 8 § S S S S S 3 S S S S S 8 S S 8 8 S S S S 8 8 § 3 8 S §o'

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooo

§00000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo§c3Qooc>aoc9OooooooooaoQQoc9oe>aooaf*5 n {*7 ro fO f*5 ro co co f*} c*i ro fl fo co rn co co co to Co o co co co co co to d

CO CO

= =I3 = = 3=)=)=1 = => = =3 = =J=J= = = = =)=1=1=>3=) = 3=I3

§ §1 g 8 8 8 § g g g g 8 g g 8 8 g g S g g g 8 8 8 S §! S! S^8

gooaoooooaaoooooooooooooooooooQ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OooooaLninLn oooo

=>=)3ZJ3=J=)=j:3:S=J=>:=i3=Srj=5=>3:3=>r>3rj:3:33=>:3=>§00000000000000000000000000000oooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooaaooooooooooooooooooooooooaooaou*>u)knLni/}i/?LnLninu*>LnL/^inLr>Lf)ir)LnunLnhnknobnv^u<>inbnhnin

-~ 01—.01 01

^-* Ol Oi ^ —» Ol 3 bl —— 3Ol ____!>£ _,£, ~ &** ~-- •-•

3 " ^ •*—*••* -- Ot O)sx C " » 0) —•* O>««• oioi 01^ u:cna)ota) c: b^

'. w— -M -M to -^^ ^ c c —^ &•«* x <a oi ^— — - — - - o>*^ 0)0)0} *—• 01 a. — "^^34->n3*o>a)'OOc • -^- u. c 01 3 c 3 _ _ ...

— _ — — C —— 2 "~ —~*i N « •— 10 O OIQ.U 3—— 4»——-^-^4.<4J W ><•p jz r""55 '!i"' -^S.~- = -yu-c Lo S « ••="-="~; u ;•< •— N >> X 10 3 .

.H _ I g J g2 N">, > > c c o ) v ^ « o o « « < a i a o ) "a.— ~ j= C ii c g S —iiiiiiC C *J U I I J 3 J 3 0 1 E 3 3 X X X X - O O Z Z Q . * J C a ) V l - « « « «*>33fi.--=~"-~~r-v£M't = « ' ' * - « 2J: >•- -r - -rO >|>— U) I I C C J ^ J J L - U U O O O C J Z - W W W O ^ f l O C C V I C M C M C My N ^ x c c a j w - e a o g w ^ i o n J J i o.- j= i. *» c c u-jj" —•—

: at z d: au a. in S !n S

flR30i202

Page 169: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

l»- C I!- ta i3 _l IC/)

Nl QJ

GO -MT3 100) tU i—4J OOl I4-> I*- ••—01 O E

'— "- I1O C IO ••- I— u

ou-ou

J!

I O<fl LUCO CJ

s

§oooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooo<=io<=ioooooooooooooooooaooooaooooooaoaoooooaaooooooooo^ooooooooaooo^o^oooooo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooog O O O O O O O O O C a O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ouoif)uoowfiuriuoounu)ir)ur)uoi/)Our)oc7ou)bOknur)br)oOLnuObfiur)uouriuOLn

gooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooddddddddd'ddoodo'oooooddoodddo'dodddod(O (A "** 'p O CO CO CO O CO CO CO CO CO CO O CO O O O CO CO CO CO CO O O CO 'C* CO CO CO CO 'C* CO

ro fO fO *•* c* PO f) m

oooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooocsaocic5aoooooooaooc)OOooooc3oooooooo d d d o d d o o o d d d o o o o o d d d o o d o a o o o d o o d a oLnuoinuoouni^u^oi/)unuounLr}LnouoaoounLnknwr)unoObriLnur)Lncr)inunhn

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooC10OOC3CDC3OOOOOCDOOC300C3000OOOOOOOC3C30000Illlllllllllll1111111111111111IIII!

«T *T IT -H «• V TTT

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g goooocaooocidoociooooooooooocaooooooooooCO CO PO PO O PO CO PO O CO PO PO CO PO CO C3 CO O C3 O CO PO PO PO PO O O PO PO PO CO CO CO CO CO

CO PO PO * CO CO CO CO

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCsJCslCVJC\jC3CNjeNlCVCDCSiCNJCWCSJC^eSjOCS*CViaOCNJC^CSJCNJCS4OOCSieN4C^aoaocoaoowcocooaooococococoocoQOOOflOcococoadaoaoaocoooaocoQOco

^ en ^•x \ ff >»^ o* **•*. en CTIen 3 en 3

*•*», *- - *- ^ *—«, —- - _ -~-r oi en 01 enen en en en * "* ^ * ~* ^ cji en "*£. ->£ $£'. cn en

- - - Q^ ^— 3 ^ •——.

_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ 3 ot- •*-• fl) cn—* s. **x - » 3 3 ^ en i ' *s. ***. —• c QJ -C ^ ch cn cncn cn cn *—•"- •**•. •^^"-^•-x.cnen cu^'—^-»*j -*^ 333c —•—**—'— •— 3 3 at 3 3 —' cn — "S cn— c cn Q. 0) ci^^— cncn^-*^^cn ,3,cn

A M N M CL O. C CO Q)(U^ •*—" *—^ *—' 3 C -^ Q) £ >t &,*—'"—' 3 Cn r* (U -w* 4J >i *-io c c e o o ( U a ) C 3 3 ( a « ^- aj E a.^ cui —3 -^ u cue^ Ql IU Q] U t_ _C _C 3) ~ ™* jC '"•" C ~ (U ^ QJ i I ^ C ~ "~ Q) ^ 4) CT itl fl) <O QJ *Oa .a .a .a o o o. o.^ O O - M O - M O C ' — occsj-— aj— >»oc'— c 3 t- c u a. i-•^ O (U <U « — -*— o o 0*^— o •— a. 4J *- i cJ^ c— o w -^ T xg»— c'c— o «S^-Jc 5o^-^

•M : i a a. a,•- a p p p T -^ =.._.__.u o o o o o"-~-cc:.jCMisiMt>>jNi

zz V «4-> c c c c c

Page 170: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

01 A a 338883888838838338838888888888E S^u QioooOOOOOoc'OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCO QJ

1 1 1CO

N 0).— 3 —

OJ QJ *•".u .c oO *J0

i a «c/1 UJ CCO O •—

I UJI O

=3 = = 3Z333=5 = = =3 = =l=33===)=2=l = r:O===l=l=) = =l§00000000000000000000000000000oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O C 9 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C 3 O O O O O O O

S8S8SSSSS8S8SS8SSSS88SSSSSS388godoocacaooodooooooooooooocadooooir>inu^u^uni^u^Lninu^iniriu^uitninir>uiLnLnir>ouiinu^ininunir>••* CO CO GO GO CO CD GO GO CO CO GO CO CO GO GO GO CO CO CO GO CO •** CO CO CO 0 GO GO CO

oooooooooogoooooooooooaoaooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooo§00000000000000000000000000 o ooLnu^iDinLniDkntOknmLDu^u^Lnuikn^tk^unir^hnouibnu^iDLnu^u^

g g g g g g g g g g g g § g g g g g g g g g g g g g g § g g

oooooaoooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaoooS'a'a'oo'oooooooooooooooooooooooooc*} n n co co co ro co co co PO co cn co n co PO co co co co 9 co co d co co co co

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8ooooooooooo'ooooooooooooo'ooooooocsir^csjcjcsjesjcsjcacsicvjcjcucsjcvicwcsjcsicNjpvicvjcsjocacNjcvjcgcsicvcxj

*-• cn ^ cnii —* cn •*-. —* o»*--—* '^ cn ^ —• cncnacn—* • cr» c n ^ ^ N . e n 3^—'3cn ^ 3 •*%. cn '—- *-»^ - ^ . s ^ «w cn 3 " N. - cn L.--^ CT cn cn cn 3 —' cn QJ 3 a) <ucn ^ 3 —-» -—> v •*-* 3 — c •—- x: -M3 ** -***—• —* cn cn"--» c *— Qj *-* on * •«-» «a**-* cn cn en . . - . - .

^** 330) ^ - s.

— - a n i o i a . . . .— jr -'-'— j:cnai-4-"en»-.c— a.o>"Oi^o>i-^cnscn Q4 J O l f l g * J 3 * J I O 3 O l l U - O O C - ^ - t - C O 1 3 C 3 -C— — - - -— re •— •— ' i^ N «•— s o encuoj 3— u— — — »*j*j w xg o. *j « m — ro - ^ c - w u J ± i 3 i j = - ^ j: cn.aio)<u-'-gj-Caicnj:j;-~c<5-ca)oia)3>i*Jtn^cCL DQ.iu^i£o3o-c- - .— o e 3 a. a. j: a.c+JC3.a.auQ> > i— « c o c -o u a) »— — — • - i- *j jz aj ~- - o o o o c v j o i ' — - n c u i - a i c n c n o o o— 3j= a.£ t. t. i_ u -c-aoo)Mot.33'— — •—i* — —

Page 171: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

3333^3333333333333333

Ee i <u

••— toOon •—QJ —o i!"S '. fQ (AI —I CO> CJ

I 3*8333333333333333333333333333.

U •*-* <UQJ -a

«M 1/1O CO

I 13CO UJ

o>,£

OOOOOOooocooooooooocooooococooocoocococooOOOOOOOOOOtSOOOOOOOO^OOOOOoooocgcsjcsj aiaiaiatoorN.cM CMCVJCSJCSI 01 o ci

CSJ CNJ CM

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O •••* O O O O O O O O «-H O O O O •••* *•• o O i-** O *>H «^ »-4 ooocooocn-"''—**-«^*^oocoo}cococococriOT—*oo}~*o}d^«^

TT-l-^-lTT~3-3T'-3-3-3-1'^T-^'-3O-5-3-3T'-3r>-^-^

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oodoevioooooooocooooopirooomommroo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo000— OOOOOOOO — OOOO— — OO—.0—.— — O

oocoaoOT«-*~*»-**-«~*oocoo}fflcOcocoCTio —*ooi-^cn0jo)«—*

333333333333333333333333333oooenoooooaoocnoooocncnoocnaencnenoco co oo co en en en en en o o co co co oo co co co co en o co en co oo co en—-t —-* * CO CO 00 OO OO OO CO * *~* *••* ~* •"* CO 9 CO CO

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooocoooooooooaooooococooocoocoeocoojy o w ZX cl caooencocoaoooaacsoocnoooocncncoocncocncnenco<NJ CM CM cnencnenenoocM CM CM CM CM en O en en

CM CM CM

§§0§§§OOOOOOOO§0000000000§0-^^—.00000000-^0^ — —««oooooooooCMCMCMi-«OOOOO*««<^CM<-«CsJCMCMCM-N^^O^H«^O-^»4-^

-H — . --t *-* -^ CM CM

333333333333333333333333333§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§000*000000000000000000000000

^ ^ ^ en en en en en en en ^ en 3 ns 3 ^ - en en en ** en <oencncn 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 •—" . <—• -^.x 3^^ cu en 15i i —*•-"—"—*-"—* -"*—vfi'»- r——» cnO'^-»'*ss.<*x.c^'*s. c• . cn "-* —« 3 en cu 3 a. cnen'O"^'"*—'—"—'aiOCMCMCMCMCMfM^-'C C C Crt4-» U t. r- "^ "^ Q "—»"3^*«4*^^^^^<^-^ <a<oni3a)oo£(ucj'~ ;O O O C O O O O O O O l - 3 3 . 3 C C U U X J = l i COt i i •*•• <—-r—^p—^^-atfivjv)—••-• to <TJ Q ex itj nj i^•VV-o ci o o o o o oH-S-S-o-a-q'S.'clS x"ci"Q.2;

Page 172: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

ooooooooo — — oooaoooao — oooooo

§ g g g g g g g g § g g 8 g g g g g g g g g g g g g §

3333333333333333333333333338OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOO

__ OOCMOOOOOOOOCSIOOOOCMCVIOOCSIQCMPJCNJO

c/l 0)4->

— c/>oin *—QJ ~U it- I10 -Q IT3e

.C 4-1— 3 -am c-a t»O) a)•M £ M

« c o.o •—S.H i

o>,.£

oj toT Qin o

00 CM?sC UJCO C_)

OOOoOOOOQOOOOOOOOQOOOQOOOCPOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooao— ,— .— .00000000000000 — a — — — i — ooocooooo

^OOOC3O-<-"C\J-HCMCMCMM — — O««CI-" — -<

333233333333333333332333333oooooooooooooooooooooooooaoC-JOJCSJ—.OOOOOOOCM—'CUCMIXIM—I—OO — O—l — — a

333333333233333322333333333o S ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

O O O C O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O J C O O O O O O C O C O C O O

«—t ** ~+ COCOQOCOCOCCCiO*"4 ^H *^ *-4 *—I COCO CO CO

333333333333333323333333333gggggggggggggggggggggggggggooooododcJcJcJoooddoooooodcJdocJCMCMCSJ«^aOOaOOOCSl<-iCJC>JCNJCSJ»^<-<OO*^O^«^^^^^

• 3 *•* 3 C - vx"5'o>*3i"5*a!"oi"oi *oi ii'"' 2 ~"5i "en —«"oi^ *• — . ^— • p» en

OlOtOI 33at

Oi<o^*w-*-ie3-0 01 3 _j "ao— 'U'—o^aj'— UC.. ..c>ta>

Q C 3 0 C O O O O 0 0 0 1 - 3 a 3 C C OI I i - ~ ^ - » — . — i— p— f— r— 'O(/)Vltfl-'-"-fQ

.as — <cMcvjco*ro 01— — <^ c— iu <- 3 3-0 01 3 _j "a->t>jcn^r^-inM3 ^»o o— ' •i.3«-'—i.ocvjcjesiMcvjcNj— c c c a i w i - U ' — o— o_Hrt«-<« — -« wi o i o a q j o o ^ a j c j ' — uy—I t I I I I I C'^-M-M-*-*^*—'— UCX-CCJ££.C

Page 173: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

S!

"S CV - u;,CO

« c JS-2o£

o vioo o

oto f-O VII <

un CD.O tS)

OO <*Jr us na73.HCO CJ "—CO Z O.

3-a

COCNJ CDO CO

si. = 3 - 3 3 3OOOO — T O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L D O

o ^r CM •—* "-i rs. otnoo CMCO i-o —< '

oaocsji—iO—tocooinpoo—'Oiootn^H CM OCMU3CT) —t O CM ^^ tO•-4 CM r ~

oocpcpo^oooooooooooomooenooouDr^aoouimoo—"OCOOU3O—'Oo—. — od —m m ao ^a* r m en

= 3 — 1 = 3 = 3 — t = 3 C O = 3 = 3 = 3 = 3 _ 1O O O O —4C M O O O O O O O O O O O O t a O O t O O O

^-— •cj^-t^^-.ooocv/mo-^<-4«4Csi O -^ co O CNJCD un H r*.

C3O^OCMUnoepOC3OOOOO^^OOOOO^^i

i-s:'I

^ 03d-,

OO OJ CM —1~H CNJ

— 1 — 1 - 3 _ 1^ :=> =) -3 3 -3 i£ 3 =>=3cas ^oooo—'"rooooaoooocnoaoooooo

I

"" " *^ E S •S-- '""* £ E "^ *^ E 4) *—' W S *"* £ E - -- ^S>i -S S g —-S- HI m i in o. I g .=..=• e e CTIcco ^iiJ^t1" 3.. •;; g J1 . 'j; I J I .— EC 5 ?- — ••- - tu •— "•""* Snja'aSOTciui'—"5"^= — 91— >,Sui5idS.cc'oco>o^iou> — •— 10034^u1U&.~O'HW.2a.fbOiOQtCUU4-'>—^'Q(QCC»— c u i a c u < o < o ^ : o o > < u i u « n i u — ou— o-cio —<1<cDODCj(jcjcj(jcj — —iZZZZO.cococot-»t-g

flR30i207

Page 174: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

«0)

reCS) O>

4-1

—— t/iO ,

~ 10 5 0)<£ "2^ N|

"S 01 "*"* - </)cy *1"°!« 21!!:3=2|»7(j 0) |

*.£ '^-52:CO

,rt 0 QJCO !•••» *J-* trt «3

C/> CJ C(_

r-.co r*.— (/)t/1 C_3c/l 3C

COCM r-*-- trt

SS

in«— t Ps,M c/)i <C

C/? CJCO Z

~O r .— * t/ito cjc/i x

01 r-%O CO

> <Ctn cjco z:

CM§rtni <Ct/l CJco s:

<QO

333333333333C03333333333oooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C N J O O O O O O O

_ _ —3 33-3 3 -3 ^3 3 3 m 3 i^aooo«-«cMooooQaoooooocooo*rooOCMOJCOCMCOOun-Q-^-— «Off>OO-«O'>OtOOO'^'U^CO

O co co co o o — «r^coco— t CO CO

3 3-3 T 3-3b<: ^3 33033 ^oao — coooooooooooooLnoomoocn — tncMiooodin^r^ocoocD-*cSotoao^'Oen

3 33^3 3Ti^ i^3 33033ooo-«r— •aaooooaao-^ao^roaix^t*— ttocur^or^csjunm^r^^^— rH,of*-.(NJto^r

3 33^ 3^^ i£3 33O33aooomcoooooooooocnoo^rooro

o co *-<*-i o -^ in en —«co coo -^

3Or-.

= _l => 3 _J 3 3 C D = 3 3 _ ISOOOO-4OOOOOOOOOOOOCMOQOOO•^o^t*)CM(OOco^rcncMOCMao^cna^orn^'—«a^(Otouioo*—i^^co^"^^ouno<ootDcoo^^rnoir> —o to to.-* -a- o ro co o —.CM ^r ^*^o co 01 CM to vn m

CT Ot Ql* ^ " ^^ *™* ^ o 01 en* SP ? * 5? ""** ********

§— § i §«g=i§I^ uflll.s^-sIuiac 3 ._ ._ g a, .— o i i Q a o i n c u a ^ -a;— x_EoOTia.cc"acc3ioj<:iTjiu> — •—Jwi-i.-0^ujaa.flOfloicuu-i-''= — T3«i a . c o o > i L . a ) < « < o w — oai— o^ucjcjcuu*^^xxzzcL(/)«/>ui^

AR301208

Page 175: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

TEST PIT SOIL SAMPLES

AR30I2

Page 176: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

5 3 «CO -—

« J= %•- *•''-* —— ooooeaoooooooooooooooooooooepooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oooooooaooooooooooooooooooaoooooooo

g g g g § g g g g § g g g g g S g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g §

o o oooopooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooooXQ. UJh- O

o ot XQ- UJh- O

I Xa. ujH- CJ

—i to to CA —«ta<-4(

3333333333r3333Or333=33Z33I333r3333Z333=!3oooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

—* O)01 ^

_* 4! *_-^ -»*. O> 3 3 *ol 3 Q) 3 •*•* ^ C <y"~*_fc<U 4J 0) 3 3 3 *—' **» *-•» •—» tO 3 Ol -C —• O —* O>c aj c *—* —^^— a) ID —^ CT aj 01—« 01 ex oj -~«—* 3 -w en •--. 01

O £ O -C £ ^ O «* 'N"*. * *~**~• 3i 3 "o '"' ' ^ 3 **w *"•!» U U 3 1» -•-» OJ *••* — I—* *~" Q} *»*

•f-*^--*-»— '•"•'"CG I *—"*- £ ££•'" (U C w *J O £ N 01 »—* O *••» CsJ *•"• CO O 41 ™"L> I ^ ,£ .£ JZ .C Q O l-™ U C -u» O H— (U 4-* O 01 I U C C **•• - 3^ • I— O ^*t__ csj _ U U U U C C ^ (U 1) '*" O D -Q A) *^ B f*l O (M U V «C V *"^ X ** O U, -i— — — - » - ) o < o j c c c " p » * - E c c o o o o - E J O ^ C O C ' *™ p— *

Page 177: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

<= >, I

O O O O O O O O O O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CMCM O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O C 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

CM COCMX

O COCM CMI X&s

I X&s

014-1

01 — "JCM CNJ UI X •—a. LU •—!— c_> a.

CO O—• CMI Xa. LU>— u

333333333333333333333333C0333333333

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CO OCO CM

3333333333 333333"333333 CD3333 3333

§ § S § § § § S S S § § S § § § S § § § § S § § S § S § § § § § § 3

S O O O a O O O O O a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

§000000000000000000000000000000000oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooa, LUI— CJ

—. —. ooooooooooooooooooooooooopooooooooI X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oa. LU1— U

ii —• Ol \i~. en *i -*.-z; ="-=: ** "ti S>CT 3 CT *~* " ^ «" ""i. *" CJi 3X *"-' - ^ CT CT O> Ol O) 3 *—'*"*•• * , *—«», -n *-•» Qf •y/ \J* \S J ^ IHCB (U W Ol Ol O) """ "" **. > " Ol ^ <U3 c 3 ii ii i^ -^ 01 01 — cn o t ^ o i a i c*-* « -^ •*v.">*.* .Ot 3 3 OI3 0 ) 3 * ^ ^ C ( U --^x: 5* o» o> 3 "™* •"*" ""•* c "*-* o» **** aj & 01 •-••OJ -M QJ 3 3 3 *-- ^v*-* <—«(Q 3 O»^:—»Oi^*-^O>c tu c *«-«»*M» i—" u cu •—•» eft <u CT"* 01 ^ *y ** <*~-> 3 + 01 L» *- . 01 • M ^ - ^ C C C ^ C n o i C JZ "^ **>> ^ W Ol" Cl W Q. JS <*>s. *Q (U ^ Ol U. *— Ol 3

§3 W +~* Q) *—1«. ~ *— "~~ (U *>—*•^^ O Ol •£ Ol £ <C C OJ

_ _ _ _ _ ^ l (J J ^ JJ JJ «s Qj ^ ,ff Q) . _g J

bi^o^-cauuc (Qu^ocuotooiaco-Mioo<ooa)a)iua.33Qji£iiSoi «- u H) 34)'— 5 i—•— <- — o o o o — •• — o. v >t«- 3 mi— 10 = <u — c £ t. ajjrj: 4J jr i- t. t- u > c n e n o « - > c a u a i e < a u o c uu a ) u o o o o a j a ) C M 3 3 ' — (QM4^Ni9€f-*-^~a} 3 1 - 3 1 a)i U.MO— I— — ——•—•— C C I • — ~-£ ££— 01 = 2 C4JQ£ M 0) —— O • — CM— m O <U —

3 mi— 10 = <u — c £ t. ajjru^.— u — £ -w —c n e n o « - > c a u a i e < a u o c u c n o a i o c a - w ' Q u3' —-£o -ai— o

•— •=~ — < O n J j ; C C T 3 l 4 - S C C O O O 5 • E .O — CUi-it-.c.c.c.coo'— o C - w a H - a j w o a j i o c c r— . >> . u. uu u u u c c > > a i a i — o v ^aiu-Ecnoaia>ai£a)— <x— o«t

o

Page 178: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

»-— +•*

3^

"S •» ,oi -1 !1 — M I

"~ CO —

Chemicals

Oet

he V

icin

ity o

0 cu

01CO CO •*-»C\J (•••* rQ1 O V)

CM rNJr X

• 001 X

Chemical

Tl

C

oopoopoopoopoopoopoopoopooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O O O O P O O O O O O O O O O O O O

~)

§00000000000000 0,0 oooooooooooooooooOOOOO6OOOO0OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

3333333333 333333 33333-3CO33 3 3333

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

CT ^^ Wm — . 01 ^» Ol ^ •»»

—» Ol— » ^ ~^ Ol01 3 en «— — *— ^—* 01 3^ — i^ >—• en 01 01 0101 3 — •OIO)CnOIOIO>!rr£ * ^ '" *— '"^Ol ~ OJ_^ c 3 i^ i^; i^ ~- 01 01 —01 O I ^ O I Q J C*~" f "" Ol "Si "5i 3 ~— — • ^ — • C — • Ol -» 01 Q.'oi ——0) *J 01 3 3 3 — ' »^ — • «- • ro 3 Ol J= —— O ird —— OlC V CT ~* " " ^ 11) 0) " Ol Q) Ol . O) Q. Q) «M«M^ 3 4_i 91 !_ ^ Ol

4-t O +J C C C ro d Ol C £ > *» <^ u Ol . Ol Ol CL Jc *^* 9 0) u Ol u .^ Ol 30)i— O l r o O l r a C X ^ ^ r o WOIO10IO3OI^3O4-IOI"- C O 3 O 3 >—Of O -J= -C -C O-^"«.*J-~^«OJi<; 3 -o — »— 3 --» — 'U OJ a i. — . a —•— ^"— Ol — •t- U u 4^ *•» 4^ U Ol Ol C Ol Ol e ^ *" '" f ^^ Ol O £ "^f O Ol f Ol = f C OJO rO O OJ OJ 0) CL 330) / r5 (51 Hi* U 0) 30) ' O *"~ / ^ (J (VI U 0) QJ T3f U *"• O O O O ** *—* CL * * « U 3 0) r»a C 0) ^ C f U 0} f " 0) "- 0) ' f •*-• ' *f - M f U U U U I O I O I O *«* C 3 U O ) C r o U O C U O I O O I O C a 4 - t i O UU O ) U O O O O a > a i < N 1 3 3 i — fl3f/l4-»rsl'QEf"~p~Q) 3 U 3 I 0)1 Q)4^O

i -i— — •— — i r j i o - c c c T i w - s c e o o a S -gjsr— coe^ " >'~ .

A R 3 Q i 2 l 2

Page 179: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

w0)

1,_ 4-*

CO , _

4-1 1

<u -" '*" N 0)= 3 -"~ CO *->

sf ?1 ° i

Chemicals

he V

icin

it

•4- *•0 C

u

3</1

O CMT xH- O

§2I XH- 0

S31 Xto

en co——I OI X1— CJ

in too oi X1— O

^ o o< X1— CJ

CXJ CMo oI Xi— o

o o1 X

u

u

= 3=T = ==3=> = 3=53-3==J03====l=>=J=J==)-l=l3==13 = =

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

CO CO — **** CO CO CO """ QO OO CO CO ~ CO ^ CO r*» •— « *~4 CO CO CO CO CO ~* * — CO S3 CO CO O3 CO CO

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CO CO CO •"* CO CO CO CO

33333333333333333333333333333333333§0000000000000000000000000000000000oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo§0000000000000000000000000000000000oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

33333333333333333333333333333333333§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CO CO CO * CO CO CO CO

33333333333333333333333333333333333ggggggggggogoggooogggggooggggooooggooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CO CO CO * CO CO CO CO

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

en ""» en^ Ot ^O» — » "* O> 3 Ct 3^ CTO» i^ — » a "H. *-* -»*-* ^^ ^ . ^ £ ^ * *— ., ""N •~*r QJ 0 O> Ol

01 01 oi > ^ **»» **%, •*%» *x. 01 crt <y jc f1* ^ 4 ~ * 333U; 3 3 5 O»W^.O»CT3*— .3^-»^— 0)*— -C+JQCIQ)-- *— * — • CT*-'*-"— ——C **^ — * *»^ ~ *^ 3 3 Ol 3 3 i^ Ot*" CT W^^ C W & 4) C ™ W O> ^ CT 3 CTQJ O O "• "i— *• 3 '*•' " ^ ^ ii \ Q) ' - i— — u * ». >* \ Ql"*** Vd •*— •* Q) (U tt)

2 c c c o o 4 ) 0 } C 3 3 < t } to — - qj § Q.J; GUI —3 -^. u cue(U (U Q) U fc- .C -C 1J ~ ' P — g »—• QJ Q QJ i | . c ™ ™ (1) ^ (U O) IQ (I) <Q (U fQo-a^jaooo.Q.-coo-MO-MOC'— O C C M — a;— >^oc— c 3 t_ c i- a. u

•— O O o — *— O*— Q.*J4JJZ C.C C— P t- |; i .XE'— C C^ O 4J ^OJ — ' QJ O—— O

•— •— ^-— — -— 4J4J4J4J c Q.JC ^c-exrc+j^i * °- - c £ £ JE e « a-u-^ j: ]*^

•I ( 1 * •! I I 1 t - C - C d l Q J 1 ^ " ™ * > f ~ i L.jC,C.C(Ul'~'<~CCX?NNNNNcsjesjco^riv^r^^'<''9(OUuz.£^*zcozcDa3uuuzacz u Q)*J c c c c c

flR30l2!3

Page 180: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

01

10

o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo_ X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O™ ' i_ r 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

4)

§00000000000000000000000000000oooaaoooooooooooooooooooooaooO O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

—« co ~^ •—* co co co oo QO co CM COOOCOCOOOCOCOCOCNJGO—*fO~*cNjcooococo

°° 0e203§gggo9==o==05===ooo=QooooXO- UJI— CJ

o oI XO. UJI— CJ

C71 OO^H O

I Xa. ujk- cj

CNJ CNJO OI Xa. uji— cj

o oI Xa. uji— cj

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOCNIC\JC\JC\ICSJCMC\JCSIC\JCNJC\iCVJCNJCSJC*JCNJCNIC\JC\JcsJC>JOC\JC\JC\ICVICNJC\JCNI

co co

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ - - - - ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _§000000000000000000000oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO "** CO CO CO (O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO O 'C* CO CO CO CO CO CO

CO CO

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

33333333333333333333333333333-,§00000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooocJooooodooooooootoO CO U3 to (O CO (O tO CO tO CO ff? CO (O CO CO CO CO (O CO CO CO O CO CO CO CO CO CD QO

33333333333333333333333333333^oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

to

ooooooooooooooooooocaoooocaoooooooooa ooooo

a ooaOOOOOOOOOQOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOo^rv'«>^r<v^«<rTr«r7^r*3i^^r«r<ir^rv^^rOTr«r>T^q-^r

CO (O

• •01 — .^ *- on

— • ^^. Ol ^ • — •O> C T i i - x O l

Ol i<£"

^. —— . — 01 3 "O) 3^^—^. <a — =

CT^C- — CU • — •.

3 *-* -x. ^ - — . en CT^C- — CU • — • O\ ( O - M f l 3— ci O) cn^ ^otcycncu c ^ j=L.ti>—•— 33U i^^x ^^ 3 •— ii C •— CU ~» 4JO)»-.(0o> cu *— • — • c ^ en 01*— •o^xcu ec en a>j=< — j=

. —— i^*J 0) »~ O) 3 — • 3 lOOli- <5 — ——3. —— EW>n->0) .10 cv cu u en 3 •— 01 ^»a)4->3>< •— e — oi«— o< — OIQ.JC^tar— -i->wia^>— ^ cc— Q.— >iecn^ ^ >i— • o Q.^3(0 (OlflU*-^ 01^ C U C U O ) ——Cn Q.'™* i^ "^ '" % X •— U -*en— » jz— ••— — j^cnai-woi'-'C— a.d)-a^o>>^-oiooi o>,a.i—3 < J O i r a s - M 3 * j « 3 C T i a ) - o o c : - ~^ u c 01 3 c 3 j=j=o><—— •»— JZ i^ JZ JC C^-lO — «— ii M *'— HJ O CnCUCU 3—— CU— • —— -~+4*J M Xoct^v+j-fig f^io ^^c-t-tcjjri 3ijz^^ jz encncVQ)"~cu•

Page 181: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooa. ix ooooooooaooooaoooooooooaoooaooooaoo£ a. uj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

^ O CO ^ O CO CO CO O CO CO CO PO OT CO O PO to O O CO PO PO CO O O O CO CO CO CO CO CO PO COtn _

en

a. •g .*> sail~ IM U

. =~

33333333333333333333333333333333333

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo'ooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooodooodoooooddo'doLninu^uiouiu^uiow^uitnunununou^oooi^u^i^unu^ooi^unuiLnu^inu^^

CO CO CO •"* CO CO CO fO

3 33=3333OOZ3 333333333333333333333CSJ CD

O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Q O O O O O Q O O O O O O a O O O O O O O OO O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

es* CNJI XO. UJt— CJ

01 CM— CMI X~

0)+Jcn * *a

CM CNJ UI X —'CL UJ r—h- cj a.

CO O— CM

to coT xa. LJJH- o

^r^cocootocotoococQtoto^coocooooiocdcototooocDtocototocococo

co co ro • •••* co PO ro co

s s. s s s s § s s s § § § s s § § s § s § § s s s s s s s s s s s § gddtttt

o o o o c a o a o o om&ttOttWttttnwQttQQQrtmcrifncriQQtricnfritilC^tncrim

co co co " co co

TTT-3""3-^T-3~3 TO-3T1T-ia = 3 = = = 33=3-33 = =) = 3a

ggggggggggggggggggggSggg§gSgg§§§gg8d d o d d d d d d d d d o o d d o d o d d d d o d d d d d d d d d d d

CO CO CO ~* CO CO CO CO

33333333333333333333333333333333333g g g g g g g g g S g g g g 8 g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g 8 Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooocioooooo

g g g g g S § g g g g g g g g g g g g g g 8 § 8 g g g g g S 8 g g g 8OOOOOOOOOCJOOOOOOOOCJOOOOOOC3C3OCJC>doCDC3C3

oocjooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaaooaaoaaaooaoaooooooocJcacsejoocJcJdcJdcJocJooododdoddcJcJcJodooood

*^ -^— •— » ^ ~^ • — » ^* *— • 01 o> C7t a)cn 01 oi c3)-» — •— » — »— . cn cn cn • — 3 u ^^ ^ a^^^oicnencn'^cncn^ ^ a o «- — • iij a>-».->.^^-^~*~v33i^^aii^b<:'^~^ — cu £ *: ocnoicncnen — — - . .ii «.~>.oi cn cii £ •— — • *J -^ 33301333 a>en--»cncn3-~3— — • 0)-~£*iOcnai— >-~ — cn— >~ — — •c~^ — — "— --sscnss— cn~»cncn— ccno.oics^'— cncn*— en 3cnS « « « g g —— 3 —— u^ o, 51;5 T>T,jS"&c? 51-5 ~^S g

' - ^ g g g S ' g i1? ' S5 g^^l S1 i"Si ?"S g i1^^Oa)0) — — "— • 3 C —— 0) £ >> d— • ~— 3 CH^^ 01 -W >NMNQ.Q.CCOa)0) — — "— • 3 C —— 0) £ >> d— • ~— 3 CH^^ 01 -W > <->J c c o o v c i i t : 3 3 i a «j ^.u E Q.J: 011 ~— 3 ~^ u cuea>4jui..c.cajf — ^>f< — jZ' — u . a a > i t - M C ' — >—a> -^ cu cn itt a) <o cu (tjja A o o o. Q..C oo-wo-woc'— OCCM— a>— >oe'— c 5 u c u a. uoao — — o— O.£.MJ=C.CB£O<-— i >i£'-cc-SoiucuO'j=iuo— «ofcfcfc-S-!?b2'PPpa.9!9.fi— c o - - p c i - - « s — ec-r.. - u s — a

: ooj^jc u u a u — g oo ojzuu 0.0.10 -* •** *-* •w' -^l^»— *J*J4J*J !4-IO;O'~^'— < M 4 - * - M « Q ( Q I - O O O O OJSJSCUCy1^'^- — i U £ J E £ 0 > > * ~ - ^ C C J S N N N I N N *^ucj3Cxzz<oztomu<JOXzz 01 oi«< c c c c c

Page 182: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

I

O <"c/l ,_

c _ _~~ Q.

Q) -J '•~ N 0)c tZ"~ CO •*->

O COCM CMI X0. UJt— o

—. OJ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OI X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O°- oooooooooooooodooooooooo'ooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O Ooocoooooooocnooooooooo*rooOooooo~*

O CO T CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 00 CO O } CO CO CO CO CO 00to co co co co co co co to co co co co co co co co co co <Js co co co co co

33-,-»333333-,333333333-,33->3-s333-J§0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

•a

33333333333333333333333333333^CO O—« CMX

X

to co•-4 _*

I X

333333333333333333333333333333

i g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g goddoooddooodddoooooooddoodoocsd

fO m

33 3 333333:3333333=3 33 3303=3O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

333333333333:33333333333333333:3

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

ooooooooooooooooooooooo

0000*30000000000000000000000000

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooaooo ooooooooooaooooooooooooocoooo

33333333333333333333333333333.l * OT

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ogcotnfnfncncnfncncnrnenroc^cnrncnfnnicnrnrnorofnrnpnfofocoaoaocoooaoaoaoaocOQoaoaoaoaocoaoaocooaaoaoocoQocoaoaoco^r

Z3I3'-3'^333"333^r333333333 33 3^3333O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

odorvdoooooooododooooooaooooooo

^ > » Ol ^ ^ CT Oi 13 CT^^ O< Ol ^ *^* 631 3 *^ 3Ol ^ 3 * Ol £ ——•**. •»-"i -»*— >v - -— Ol 3 *-* Ol (-"^.OtOlOl O) 3 •— Ol QJ 3 (U 0)O l ^ ^ 3 "-^ .—. OJ —— 3 •—— C —— -uJ

-» 330) "*N. •"'** 3 •— i C — <U "*. -* CD —» 13a»aj •* -* c **N.O> 01—•O'^QJ £c 01 QJ J: — '--^ *J ' <U —» O» 3 -* 3 (0 CH U (fl ••- —• 3 —»

'—• - ,c ,c j± c *-* «j ~ *—• N'O'" flu o»o.«3 -* <y *—**

O Q)C3OOO'"->>CC'— -r— r— -^UOO(0<D^*J C_S O tj UJ

O >»»-" (oi i c c j r + J U u y u o c j C J : * J 4 - » - 4 - * O ( O ' O Q C C M o g e \ j e \ j

AR30I2I6

Page 183: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

0 <"

"1,•s « \tu — ''-NO)

= | =

•o <u 2

*v ° §

Chemicals

1he

Vic

init

y— S

<+- *•*0 c

Crt

<uCO CO J->CM r< MSI o wl- 0 •-

un tnCM CM1 X

H-0

rr ooCM CJM

1 X1— C_>

u

u

.

O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooCO CO CO CO O CO CO CO O CO CO CO CO CO CO O CO O O O CO CO CO CO CO O O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO

CO CO CO " CO CO CO CO

3 3 333333333 333333333333333333333§0000000000000000000000000000000000aaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooocnoooooooooooooooQooooooooooooooo

CO CO CO ~* CO CO CO CO

"oi •-.«••. "oi 3 Oil* 3•*6 O1O> 1* —— 3 -^ — • — . —— —»~ -- . -- - * *L *& — • ^ s~. - * o» 01 01 013 i* K n 01 oi i'oi'—'ai'oii* i* 3 o u ~— oj "o!-^.^-^'"Sl Ol '— "— ' ». >•. 1* >^~v "& "S "~" 01 JZ •— •-» *J >». 3 3° 31

OCCCOOCUCUC33'ro'~"«"~"~'^_a)S~"eD.itU l"^ "^ »»3~*~».u"~'cucb> CU CU ci) U k £ r- ju »™ ™ " JZ ~ 1 ™* Q) r QJ 1 1 4 C ** ~ Q) - - 4) o> 18 CD <O CU (Oo .a .3 .a o o a. Q.X O O - M O - W O C — O C C M — aj'-^oci— c a u c i - a . u— o o o — —o— a,*j*j£c^C"-ou— i >>£»— cc— o e u i u « — x: a) o — .0-cui_u.c.cu>>oooa-a)a.a)'— c^o— oc i — u cu «^ e c '— *j u 3 •— 3UJ=J=JT u u^jj".-.- a (T — — n o.t3 « — a. o o o — fl Q.S t cu —-=;»-. .— .t— u u u i — i— u £ c c c u u > , > , o o ' ~ o c g u u u > , o o - c : - i : u r o r a j a o > - x :-i 1 t • -1 1 1 I 1 -C -C 0) iy -f- — • •*-( UJS££_O'^— C C X N N N N N

Page 184: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

Ol

1o <"1/1 _

01 -• '""" N 01

.2E -C

LTJ

§00000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

£SJ CM O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OIX O O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O O O O O O O°~ — odo'o'o'cido'dddddddddocJddddddo'dood

•» ooCM CMI X

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

" Ol *"01 i oi

Ol *£. 3 ^ Ol •—- •—'^ —.—.- ———— Ol 3 -N. Ol t-

——'"' 3 3 < U ii-» •» 3 •— H£ = — 0) ^ *JOI —-10CIOI -•—* G -^Ol Ol~-'T3~-,0) EC — - - — -

OI~-IO OI01UOI3—— Ol —— 01 <-> 3 X •— E —« Ol—• Ol •—.OIO.-Ci^oi— *j*>«ii— st cc— a.—>xmoivi: ^ X--.OQ.*>.3fl3 c g i g w ^ x 0>^-* 0)0)0) "^ O)Q.'1~i " .1— x *" u —»oi*—* .c --*•— " ai oi -M oi-—* c-'-a.oi'o^ax^otoo* oxca.1—— •— £ i£ £ x: e — "^ — ^ N <o'— « o" en a. ai 3«— o]>— ~- *!*! ?! >?•O-COIOI.C.C—•-C(SiOIOIO)3X*>rO—— CO. Ol'•*-OC3OLCL^(OJZ-MC3A^UO) • I"-0)C

XX«3J=Q.f U U U U •CT3OOIIMOU33'-'— <— J=i «j -M *^ ^a.^-woioooO'^oi w * c '™ «« ^ ^ £ •**a i c s o o o ^ x c c * — ' — '— •— *—• t - o o < g o i ^ - M uuouj• oi.aONMX.ciooi.c-c.c.coot.i-jS.aoC'— 011 i i i

i 3 X — —.»• — — — r— - 01 01 0) 01 C « I I 10 — 01 -C -C X ••- — — ••-

/If?30l2l8

Page 185: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

•*- Ia. :

N a.4-1

CD C

oo<= >>«

§2I XO- UJt— t_>

2SI X

o s>I XCL. UJ

iSXa. i

CSJ CMOOi xa. uj

I Xh— O

i =5 :oooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooCMCMCM — -^_HI_)__-CS1CS) — CM CM CM CM — — ^CM"^ —•"'" ™ —•

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOr^OOOOOOOOr»*OOOOr*.r*~oor»~o^r>.r*.

— — t— i COCQOOOOCO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

f—if—<^H ctcncncncoooco*"4 — — — «•« coco co co

333333333333333333333333333ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

oaoooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOCDOOOOO^OOCAOOOOCO(OOO(O^COCDU?Or^r^^*cotoinuntnLnoar-*cor^r^.rN.N,cooOLnoaouiaoaoco^*-«^Hf-i aococOaocOr-»r-%—« ^4-^—4-^ cor»« 03 GO

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO^CSJOO^C3OOOOC\JOOOOCSJCSIO

OOOOOO

< v^ aicnmcnoicoco-^ ^^^^---^ cico 01

O Q O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O Q O O O O O O a O OooocnoooooooocnooooOTCTioocnocncncno. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .QO co oo co en o) o) 0*1 01 o o oo oo co ao co oo oo co o o co eft GO co co efti— • — * t— i OQCOCOCOCQCOCO*"* ^^ «H — 4 *^ CO CO CO CO

533333333355335333535533533§00000000000000000000000000OOCOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOCOaOOOCOOOOCOaOO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

•-««"* «—t OOOOCOQOOOGOOO~* .-* — •-4 * 00 CO 00 00

01 en en 3 o)a — • 3 ^ — • ^ ^ en — -^£^:^^^^^ !*: ~» <u ' ~» — • <u i 3 01

x en •*-> Ot Ol "Ol*~ "» CT 3 *0 3 '*"

<u ' ~» — • <u i^ 3 013•*-> Ot Ol "O «. • — ,~~- — > . — . c • —

"•"•• "» Q1 (31 O1 O) Ol Ol Ol*~ "» CT 3 *0 3 ^ '*" Ol Q1 Ol ™* OT <Oen en en 3 333333013— x- — •^^xa^i^aJcni^TJOJO' — a. i_ 3 3*0 Bi3_iT)O -— *^— U 3 -*««* u— _ B

UJ I — •— * I t t I I I t C U- t^» U~ —— i^"— • — (J C!C.CCJ££.Ccsa u u u i _ i _ i _ t . •-•— — — j=j=>iiucQo£oacoua O C O O O O O O O U 3 3 3 C C U U X 4 = l 1 0 3 1 I II ,.„ ——— _ _ _ ^ . ^ ^ _ _ _ ^ - a w M w . _ _ . _ _ f l B O O _ B f l | „,££

H • f c - o u u u u u u ^ ' O O O f « L . 4 - * * J J Z i Q J Z J Z f a 4 - t E H•• •• ••n 5 o 5 o o o o ai-g-S-S-q-o cuaS XQ.Q.2^- I §- • - • — u u i . u t . u u — c c c c c a j o j a j o ^ " * — otoi'Bio•vv«<4<«<c«C<oujuJUJuaujX2:X)— 10 iaja-a en 01

flR30i2!9

Page 186: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

i-rew ,

" 04

-

co o-* CSJ

„, o o - o-50 >,£">.t: s.z*-"5 !S » i5^ - . x

•"T Q. ujb -"

1 X

CM COCM (SI

CM CMI XQ_ UJ

CO CM*•* CM

i XQ_ LU

01 — «CM ffd U1 X -^

Q- !CJ

i3ZD33333OO3=3333^Z3333OO3O333(ooooooooooooooooooooooooooloo^oooooooo-—'OOoo-*»-«oO'--«o—«•-«—«o

.^•-«^HOOcocncQaocpaDcncr>*-«OQpJ —•* o en en »-*c^oioioocO'-^ —t ^-i •*-( ^» • mcq en ai

ooO*-4

ooooooooooooooaoooaoa>^Hi—»^^—<-^ooa3cDoococoaoa>cn—«OCT)-^o^<xoi'-*^t *_« ^H (jioicncncncoco-^ —* —, -^ _^ CT^CO OT en

§00000000000000000000000000oocoooooooooaoooooaocooocoococoaoo

§00000000000000000000000000oooooooooooooooooooooooooo

^enroc^rtcnor^^H^c\jCMCMc\j^^rn^i-4<ff.^M^^—*-— *-^ OO CM <—' PO —< CM ^-*

§00000000000000000000000000O O C M O O O O O O O O C S I O O O O C M C M O O C M O C M C M C M O

oocooocncMCMCMCMCMOOaocTicoaoaoeocnaicMOcncsicTicnaieM•~4^^—t o)cnoia)cnaooo>-« «^«^^«^M o^ao CT> en~-i f* f-i

333333333333333333333333333oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooomooooooOou^oooou^u^oou^ou^munoo

cncncncncn*1'** ^^^«^*^^

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooC\JC\JCSJ~*OO_OOOOOCSJ~*CstCNJCMCV~^M'OO*-*O~*"4—«O.

— < CM •-*

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOCSlOOOOCStCMOOCMOCJCSICSJOcdcdccirocsic\jc\icvicsjoococncocdcdcoencnc\j«-*^-4»-4f^c))encncncnaoco*^ ^^ »^ *^ —« en OcncMencnencNj

.ii —^ .~».en ^ —a'encus'ei enenS^S-SSencnen>j£co*-4CNjc\jao^ro cn»»*-^{/>^ c~^uu u =1 3*0 cf) 3 —i ~a333^-HCMCnT^-lOU33 -«.O O~-—— U 3 •—~t-*-**—•*»» cnocMCMCsicMcviCM ^ c c c e n - w u u ) — o *-^ O

3-H-«—«— -H — « «fliS3a)OO£<l)CJ'— UU'T§LU I— "M* I t I I I t 1 c **- **- *- "-* *" •" U CX£UfX£a o u i . i - u i . u u — F- i— •— ^fxvoauxaacouo o e a c o o o o o o o . u . 3 3 3 c c u o x £ i ' « > ' ' 'i i i -»-•— i— i— r—i— i— »— •a«(/i(fl"-"-(fl«oci,'g(o i i Q a n a• • • U O U P U U U ( J p ~ O O O t . W 4 ^ 4 ^ X i O j £ ^ ( 4 4 ^ g gTrf»r-ooo5ooooa)-OT3T3'O-OQ.Q.*Jxa.Q.*j'— SE- - . • = E £ : b i : u u & - - c c B c e : w v a i O ' — — o j a i S n jTT^r<j:«(<<<<i«i<aLuujujLuujiza:i— <a us -o ~o cncn

flR30i220

Page 187: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

W0)

I

1?*•* tz t

*"" M Q-

= 3T3"~ 03 C

"S *^ t*~ -H'SouQ >» '*j

|i iS» '.*- *••0 .5

to

0)co ao 4-1CM f*» fl1 O V)Q. LU C1- 0 •-

iO OCM CM

, ' XO_ * ' 'i— ej

T aoCM CM1 Xa. ua1— O

<eu

u

=>33=9=>SS=}3=)=3=)=> = 3r>==>=>

-*>^<^ou')Lninu^moo~*o~*'-*~*"*ooOOOOOOOOO- 4— .OOOOOOOO

= = =3 = = === = = =)= = = = = ==) =goggggggggoggggogggao QO oo oo oo co oo co oo o o oo co co co co co co co•4 ^ * QO CO CO CO CO CO CO ^ ""* ^ ^

=,=, = = = = = =3 = =5=, = = =s = = = = =ooou*)oOoooooou">oooo<-nLO

Q» Ol5~ ^

^ *. 's. **•** * ^ "*>. s, "« w *j en en "Q< ^ * ^ Q) Cn CT W Ol O1 W ^ d 3 (Tj 3 £ 'cncncn 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 1 3 — **- s— .^, x•^^""-fc^s^CJ* ^.— 3 C n « U 3 C

*—**—"—• ooesjcsjcsjcsjcsjcsi^^e c c 01 *•> t- u.O UJ H- •— ' 1 t 1 1 1 I t C ^*- *W U- •—— \i ^" •—§OO Wt.k.L.U.Ii.I-"-^"'™'^ j* fQ O C O O O O O O O 1 - 3 3 3 C C U C :

^•^•^<<<<<<C<<OUJUJUJUJUJ£3:

33=3=923333

LDOOU^OOOL/)o~*oooooo

=3=> = = =3 = = =

oocoocacocod

CO CO CO CO

========OOlDOi/lU^mO

CO 1— 03 CO

"S

— • Ol— •O> 3 CJ1

~- .-». Ci^-N. C C't. a 3-S"m3j-oO.—"~" 3.*~"1' ou cS2oSS!c>»aicau£cocouX £ I i CD 1 1 1

" W Q I — i— a j i y i g i t ixi— ia 19^-6 01 ai

flR30!22l

Page 188: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

0)

io *"t/1 __ I__ I

• JOm 5o v?

4J y <ndl u_ '«

•- .<£»=

5 5 i

03 — —•

—I _J

O O O O C TCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOr^OOOO

~t *-4 Ol

I 00 to

=> CO =3-1 CO 3 CD =>' =J = = —1oooooiooooooooo—.oorocnomoo

ooCM

C Q Z 3 3 - J

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOcnOOOTOOCnOO

O(0lS>COOOCnO~«CO-*OCStO*TOOgr*.O~* — OOOWJCn •-* CO CSJ ^ •v

=3 co 3 3 _i a 3 =1 3 o —ilOoocncooooooooGoooocntaocnoo

i csl ^ u^ O) C>J enI r*. CM

C D 3 3 — J 3 C O 3

coro — CM- *o^orx.oaoc7i^ , , ^ o ^- « <M -HOin 01 O CO

3 03 3 _J 3CQ 3 3 3 3oooocntnaoooooooooooocMOcnOLoaiLnrouoomtoo— * o — « o o — «toooaimfo

= CD =3 _J 3 O3 3 3 3 =1 -J

§ § § § S S § S 2 § 2 g 2 g g 2 3 g § g 2 S S ?d. o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .H— 3C ^ to c? o CM m <*} in -« o i

^ ^ CO ""H ^ <^ O

^ ^ 531 ^ CT CTa»o-^ i£ — *— » o* — *\ > a»— » s. 01 01 £ --•— » en- *— » i^o» menw^» **^ ••-»— * ' <

£ c 5P ^ ^ 5P ff & *"K* **** S* O O) « " CT * " c * * ^ c c O***•••* *~* B S) c € * 5P ff B £ B JP "" * 5P SP 1™* *" ^

§£"0^ '— g B § "^ ID i" I*'- S >i '-2 1 § § ?c g"" g*™" 5 3"-** t-"O *—' •—• wi c t» *"• w ••- t. g •*-••- ^6— Q) •— *> S oo'iaa.cc'oc 01 o -^ ra ai > — •— «u

Page 189: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

o "'tn ,_^,

I-S «a> u_ •w o -eo .z

s i

« = 5•Si 5V

5^cn

1 UJ

oooocamoooaooooo —

gOOOCSJCpOOOOOOOOOOOOU">OOfOOOCD O CO Csi CO O tO T ™N •—* O CU O O *-* f*» O IO v^ 1/1 «-^ O

O *$• CO ^ •—» Csj O •—» LO O csjCT) r>, •—<O

CSJ O1 ^«-* CSJ

3 ^ Z5 '^ i£ s^Z3 33CO2 ^

3 33T 3^ *Z 3 3 = C D 3 i ^§0^00*^^0^^00000000-^00000— iCSJtOCNJCOO^'unoi'^OCs;OO--*'-»O(J3OO'^ — •«

OOOCSjr^OOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOCAOO

^ co eO — * LO— « CSJ

CD 3ooooroooooooooooo—-oorooomoo

o*

•=> Z3 ID " O ^ v: iZ =) =3 CDoooocsjuDooaooooooooo^roocsjooou3(otocsjt0oo)rs.c\jCMOrooO*-«roo<j3'Ht0^ro)tn

CO

o"

=oCD

cDOOfoaio^i-n — ocoocoocooo— «cootfi*^co co esj o ^ — • ~* co co to- co *r - r

W^ 9 fe x^Il —— B-SCO •- E E 5C O'~ E*™* 3 3-»--M•**Ec3*—'"-—E' —E - ~ O J — > , E o O r os-4>i»fc.u"O^-w.a.— C U f l Q J < O " 3 ^ O O > >

.o ) O c n c u u - M > — >~'O<qcci-DT)a)aj— O J J — O-Cfl —iiiEa-cooic/ii— :>M

SR30I223

Page 190: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

WCD

1£ a,

0 <"C/l , __ 1

•M I

"O -Q

-a j, SO ' —0) „_ <0*•* « •*-•0) ° 0)0 >,3Cfl .ti ' —

ll-5|i

flI

00 0)OO r*. jJ

Q_ LJ C

01CsJ

Q_ CJ»— X

CO^ CJesi

t UJ&^

u

1

~^| 3 gQ 3 fy^ -^ 3 3 3

ooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O < N I O O O O — > r - ~ O O C X I O O O O O O O i n

»4 H c\J — " U3 ul

= -1 3-3 => ^ = (0

§Sgg~S§SSS2gg§§2ggS§S5SSCO ~H CNJ LO CO «T

— en m

= 3=-3 3-31* 5«£= ==503= J^

§§S§2SoSSS2gS§§S2gSSSS§§omincooovoomMocooioooooOknocncMesj » en ro un ui .o" o «-* CsJ

Ils-s Sii-s-ai s-s l-a-allliif fjilliU f t|~i||ilff>i *— • 3 E *—"*-* en en 3 en *— • a E -"» E S en

CO •— S E 3 (U E £ — • <U >> — 3 33£C Q*— S^ 3 3-^*J ^-Q •*-•*-' </T C t. »— W — U E "- — •**•"- £ C 3 •— •»- — P — (U — < U < 0 3 Q J V ) C < U S ' — "O

^llcSlISsScSo1- SJ^II^o^^oxJ-

Page 191: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

TEST BORING SOIL SAMPLES

flR30I225

Page 192: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

OJ

r— QJ

O ——on en01*——

O TJm c<e0) Kl

.0) *J •—

0p~ ~ os 0 - ij uj co>< I

V> C

CO: ai LUI U

Ulo un inI 03 —ice a >o uj roCO C_) -*

oI CO *"*; a i

CMo -^ ini co —iz a io uj en

S O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ooooooooooooooooooooooooaaooaooooo

O O O O O O O O ^ O O O O O O O O O O ^ O O ^ O O O O O O O O O O Oaooooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooo

oooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooaaooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooo

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooaaoooooooooaoao

OOCM — — _ _ — — __ — —1I 03 «-4

> .— • oi«— • i^ »». 01en 3 01 -» — . — *t — . o> 3*t- — *: — 01 01 ai 01 01 a —•^ •»»•-•»-•—• a i ^ ^ ^ 3^— «-•en o» e> 01 o> 01^ ^» ~- -^ • — ^ 01 — • ai3 C 3 -^ O> Ol — >O) O I ^ C O I U C~— 3— »- .- .-«» 01 a 3 013 a j 3 ^ ^ ^ c <o —j± a> en en a •— * < « £ - * c -* a> . ai a. o» «-«0) *J (I) 3 3 3 —— ^« <-» — . « 3 Ol ^ *~ Q It-— Otv c: *-**-"— at u — ' > 01 ai 01—o a aj c c oia-a^en0) *J (I) 3 3 3c v c: *-**-"— at u — ' > 01 ai 01— en a. <u ~^- 3 -wa o a aj c -j£i-jz»)iuaic-^— -aw o - w c_ , _ _ C ( t J O » O I C -C —^ *N. UOI^*OIO*Q.i^»."o 01 UOIU —-• OlSr— 0>I00)>QQ.^^<8 •MOICn<DO3Cn^3Q-MC7l**~ C O3O 3-c oj:j=J= 0- - *'--:— v^c 3-0-— —. 3 -~.— ^ 01 3 % — « -^T —-r: « —U U U4J-M4-* U OIOIC OIOIS^x. *^ ~- £ —' Ol OS —' OOI^OI^ £C QJ= £^ g g S §-3^g.5£^E 51«S=SS«>2g2Eo,2^t;^.H3.a^«!2f w ^ u u u u i oioio-^c3uoic l e u o c u c n a o i o e a w i o t .

'7cvllT^-S-ii-SSS^lec-5i2Scco91oo<n-l^'rcuertXT'- u—. — -«—.^.csicvjoiia: a> c S 8 5 u u f— •— •— •— i/> .a .c -u >,*j^-*jjj m"- c c. . . . . . .1 i i oajt-1-uflnj.c.c.c.e"-— * j 4 > - M « o o o i - i - — ~.-!—<,*_«—• — .^(MCM»T<a3cna3<nc_)!_jc-><->ot_>i_>oujZtrt!—i—>—i—t—>—=>=>

RR30I226

Page 193: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

OJ

II

tu •*•» •M 1O i*_ ••—s ° ica 5"°"- i« C IID UO —

' S

IT)o in inI 03 — «

co ••*a icj co

o -H inI CO —4ce a i§UJ COU —'

00 3333333333333333333333333333333333O rv oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

ooooaoooooooooooaoaaoooooaoooaooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

I CO CO ~* CO CO CO CO

§0000000000000000000000000000000000ooaoooooooooaooooooaooooCTOooaooooooddddddddcidcJcJddcJcJdGiciddcidcJddcjddduDodo

CO CO CO ™* CO CO CO CO

33333333333333333333333333333333333g g g g_ § g g g g g g g g g g § § g § § g g g § o o g a g g g g o g goooooooooooooooooooa'ooooooooooooooa.—»^H^^*^o^^^H^^a^H^^»^p-4^^^^Ot—«ooo«—t^**—»*-*^Hoa*^^^^^'-«-^^^-^-^

33333333333333332332332233323332332Sooaoooooooaooooooocaooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooac3C>c3c3c>de3dddc3c3adcicJdc)cJc>cicJc3C3c3C3C3c3ooodc>om ti* (jQ (J3 Q m tr^ (^ Q m tn m tn m fj"i Q >r^ f~i Q i*-S rn tfl /r> yj (^ Q Q ffS frt rpi (jQ fp to fp (j5

2-5 2•>» *6 —• «oi1** at a>3 a) 3^ ^ 01 01

i en o»**» "*»-

O>O!-».aiO13-~3— ~— ~ U— «i4JQOIOI—— •-• -^ O)- —— — '«—§—»— — •— •— 3 3 ai 3 3 — » 01- ai ai— • c aia.u ci^— 01 01— > o» 3 01oo^»^»3— — • x Xi^ai—X'— i— u^.>ix^oi— •:><: ^'i^ajiua)Nc aiaiai.c.CQO'—N N N O - Q - C C O - .

3 3 < Q IP _•« £ CL^ 0)1 ^3 ^.U CUC'— •— JS'-J:^-Q» .a ai i i *» e ^- r— u •— a)a<ioa>ioa)"SO O * J O - I - > O C — OCM-— 0)'— >,OC'— C 3 1- C U Q. U-

. .it— a i u c a i e a i 01 . — O)£ c a. 3 w 01 o>- x en— iu 01 u <u<U3Q)33(3>N3.wa)'— •— £33an>«.3oic3£^---— ~-— ~-—— 3C~-IU-C> Q.~_—— 3 CT~- U «-» <-• >i

C O O U U C 3 3 < Q IP _•« £ CL^ 0)1 ^3 ^.U CUCu u u i v s - i - —O J3 J3 -5 O O— --- — — - .« — .csio —

• o o - = j = i - i _ e i u — B a o o j E > > _ _ — .i — — « *j *j *j i <->oS'—•—>—-u-w-wnjfli-oooooij^Sju — — • —i t.,c.e.eaj — — c c -C PM N - • - • - •- I I I I I I .1 - I l l l l l l O U C d J O )

AR30I227

Page 194: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

0)

— 4)— ^io •—

^T3

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

' ~ PO nC CD -M— UJ

01 ~•a oa> -M >•M iO t*- •—

a <->

03 oU -i-

§ <yo -wo —

CO

aso

ulCO§aB

i CMGO

I CJ

03

oooooooaooooooopooooooaoooooaoaooooooaoooooooaooaoooaooooooooooo'o'o'oooooooooooooooooo'oooooo

oooooooaoooooooooooaooooooooooooooaooooooaoooaooooooooaooooo

oooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooaooooooooooaoooooooooooooaooooooociooodcicioaoocjaooocJaooooooaoooaoocaooocaooooooaocvjc^cvjcMcwcjcsiLnaoPsio^Hpoo

PO

3--- oooooooooaooooooaooooooooaaoooooooooooooooooooooooaoooooaooo- ~aoooooooaaooodooooc>oc)C)ac>aaoaas

33333333333333333333333333333^gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

C3 (O CO (O CO CO CO CO (O (O CO tO CO CO CO CO tO tO CO CO (O CO O CO tO tO CO CO (O

en

Page 195: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING STRATEGY (ARCS) …1. S 77° 59' 10" E, 77.34' (N 76" 10' W, 78.00' grantor's deed) to a found 1" iron pipe (iron grantor's deed); and, 2. S 02° 48'

tfi<u

I^ uo •—00 I/)

ac—C —U <4- 1

V W•U -J 03(UNO.

1 — -*JC CD C

•o jr wQJ •»-* (U

** <4- 2a) o oo> >* *>0 *J «•— <a« c a.la o i

o +•»•5-S

a00

CO1 CO§1 . t

CJ

ino in In1 CO ~4ce Q iO LU CO

CO •o eg m1 CO *^go t

LU COm t » — .

CMo ^H inI CO ^^a: o iO LU COCO SJ — <

^^ •O O CM1 00 ~*oc a i

'

<ao

u

333333333333333333333333333

222SSSSSS§§2S2222SSSSSSoSSSooooooooo — — -aoooaoooo— -oaoooo

333333333333333333333333333ooooooooaooaooooooooooooooooooaooooooooocoooooaoaoooaooaoaoaooCO OO CO OO CO Op CO 00 00 O O CO CO CO CQ CO CO 00 CO CO O CO GO GO OO 00 CO^H«-*^H COCQCOCQCQCOCO*— « *,«* . COCO GO GO

- * ~*

333333333333333333333333333O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O.oooaooooooooocoooo^ooaooocoocdcbcoo*-4^i*-4 coaoaOGOcaaooo^^ ^^^t^^*-* coco co co

333333333333333333333333333oaooooooooooooooooooaoooooor^!*.r»oocata<O(Oc0oor«.oo!*.r<».r-.r>.aoaoc0ooocaeocooota

-- -

333333333333333333333333333/§00000000000000000000000000OOcoooooOQOOrooooococoooroOrococooO) 0) Q O) CO CO CO CO CO C3 O O) CD O) O) O O) Cn O) CO C3 O) CO O) O) O) CO«-«-*^ cncncncncncncn*-* ^ , 4 ^ cncn en en*-» •-. ^

— » 01en at x^ ^ — . "Si—

S2SSSS2 2 .o .~v2 ^ '«1i^ *» — CB Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol "* CT 3 <O 3 •*" Ol Ol Ol '" O! ioicnen 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 1 3 * — «- •>—>xx3^^aiai^'oojoioiaii^ca — CM<NIOO»O 01— — ui i<: c ~*LU u 3 3-0 oi 3_ -j -a«. ^ -M» cnocvjdjcgcMCvjcsj <M» c c c c n * - i i - > u r — o — O

aaoc^o^^o^oo^^ousssccouxii i e a i i i

Z'»"V<* < J J« iiolLSLullJ']!'^ J'f''f J5 oil

SR30I229