Top Banner
Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011
29

Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Algebraic ReasoningJanuary 6, 2011

Page 2: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)

• More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to college and career readiness

• Grades 3−8 Tests are in same grades and subjects as TAKS

• High schoolTwelve end-of-course assessments in the four foundation content areas—mathematics, science, social studies, and English—replace the current high school TAKS tests

Page 3: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

NEW ASSESSMENT DESIGN—STAAR

• “Fewer, deeper, clearer ” focus• Linked to college and career readiness• Will emphasize “readiness” standards, defined as

those TEKS considered critical for success in the current grade or subject and important for preparedness in the grade or subject that follows

• Will include other TEKS that are considered supporting standards and will be assessed, though not emphasized

Page 4: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Readiness & Supporting StandardsReadiness standards have the following characteristics:• They are essential for success in the current grade or course. • They are important for preparedness for the next grade or

course. • They support college and career readiness. • They necessitate in-depth instruction. • They address broad and deep ideas. Supporting standards have the following characteristics:• Although introduced in the current grade or course, they may

be emphasized in a subsequent year. • They play a role in preparing students for the next grade or

course but not a central role. • They address more narrowly defined ideas.

Page 5: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

STAAR

Page 6: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Digging Deeper

• Study the documents both vertically and horizontally. What conclusions can you draw?• What implications does this have for

our work?• Share your thinking.

Page 7: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

STAAR: Griddable Items

Page 8: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

High School: 5 Griddable Items

Page 9: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Math Categories

Page 10: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

TAKS Blueprint vs. STAAR

Page 11: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Algebra Readiness Components

• Texas Response to Curriculum Focal Points (TxRCFP)

• Math Professional Development Academies • MSTAR Universal Screener• Project Share (MSTAR academies, OnTRACK

courses, etc)• RTI

Page 12: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

TEKS PD Workshops in 2011

Page 13: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Algebraic Reasoning: A Function-Based Approach

Page 14: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Why Use a Function Approach when Teaching Algebra?

• Read 1-page overview independently• Share your thoughts with a partner.• Why should we use a function

approach when teaching Algebra?

Page 15: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Engage Activity• Simplify the expression x + x + 3 using paper

and pencil only2x + 3• How do you know if you’re correct?• How can students check to make sure they have simplified an expression accurately?• Input each expression into Y1 and Y2.• Graph them and examine their tables• What do you notice?

Page 16: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Engage Activity Cont.

If the expression x + x + 3 is equivalent to the expression 2x + 3, then the function f(x) = x + x + 3 and the (simplified) function g(x) = 2x + 3 have graphs that are exactly the same.

** Any thoughts?

Page 17: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Research on Function-Based AlgebraArticle: “Improving on expectations: preliminary

results from using network-supported function-based Algebra”

• ALL– Read 1.0 Introduction (p. 1)

• Partner 1– Read 2.0 Background starting at Function-Based

Algebra Revisited (pp. 2-3)• Partner 2– Read 2.0 Background starting at Supporting

Generative Design with TI-Navigator (pp. 4-5)

Page 18: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Moving towards a Function-Based Approach

• Algebra Strand in Elementary Mathematics (NCTM, PreK-12)

• Rich algebra experiences in the early grades • Integrating technology to enrich algebraic

thinking• Integrating Algebra experiences in other

content areas and other math strands• Focus on mathematical modeling

Page 19: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Algebraic Reasoning

1. Generalization from arithmetic and from patterns in all mathematics

2. Meaningful use of Symbols3. Study of structure in the number system4. Study of patterns and functions5. Process of mathematical modeling,

integrating the first four list itemsKaput (1999)

Page 20: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Technology

Technology is an essential tool for learning mathematics in the 21st century, and all schools must ensure that all their students have access to technology. Effective teachers maximize the potential of technology to develop students’ understanding, stimulate their interest, and increase their proficiency in mathematics. When technology is used strategically, it can provide access to mathematics for all students.

NCTM Position Statement on the Role of Technology in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (March 2008)

Page 21: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Tools for Enriching Algebra Experience

• Graphing calculators, CBRs, etc• TI Navigator• Computer Applications and Software

(Geometer’s Sketchpad, Cabri Geometry, etc)• Web (National Library of Virtual

Manipulatives, NCTM Illuminations, data graphers, applets, etc)

• Podcasts

Page 22: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Resources

• TIMath.com• Activities Exchange

(education.ti.com/exchange)• TIMiddlegrades.com (TI-73 Activities)• Student Zone (education.ti.com/studentzone)• TI 84 New OS 2.53• T^3 Online Course (Using TINav System)

Page 23: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Polynomials

Page 24: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Discussion Points

• Why is it critical to begin exploration of an algebra concept with concrete manipulatives, then move towards the pictorial and finally the abstract?

• How is mathematical modeling involved?• Why is it important for students to make

connections between various representations of algebra concepts?

Page 25: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Quadratic Functions

Page 26: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Discussion Points

• What patterns did you notice in the models you constructed?

• How did the patterns in the models relate to the patterns in the table and function rules?

• How do the rules, graphs, & rates of change compare for perimeter and area?

Page 27: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Discussion Points

Page 28: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Reflections

• What are some of the implications of the new STAAR assessment program?

• How can we dig deeper when teaching algebra so that our students have a better understanding?

• What are some strategies we can use to help students conceptually understand algebraic structures?

Page 29: Algebraic Reasoning January 6, 2011. State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis on alignment to.

Next Meeting

• Bring a sample of student work related to the concepts we discussed today.

• Be prepared to share at least 1 thing you have implemented in your teaching from this training.