Top Banner
ALCON LABS Project Chiron SMU TEAM ALCON
26

ALCON LABS

Jan 06, 2016

Download

Documents

kura

ALCON LABS. Project Chiron SMU TEAM ALCON. Project Overview. Project Background Problem Description & Core Objectives Action and Approach Plan Analysis of Situational Approach Analysis and Managerial Interpretation Recommendations. Project Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ALCON LABS

ALCON LABS

Project Chiron

SMU TEAM ALCON

Page 2: ALCON LABS

Project Overview

• Project Background

• Problem Description & Core Objectives

• Action and Approach Plan

• Analysis of Situational Approach

• Analysis and Managerial Interpretation

• Recommendations

Page 3: ALCON LABS

Project Background

• October 2003: Alcon Madrid manufacturing plant closed down– Madrid’s product baseline of 170 SKUs

and 12 million units were transferred to Fort Worth headquarters

• Before the Madrid divesture, the Fort Worth manufacturing plant was producing 230 to 250 SKUs and 70+million units

Page 4: ALCON LABS

Definition of the Problem

• Whitestock Lines 1 & 2– Production inefficiency and delays

– Lagging downtime• Line clearances (LC) occupy 20-30

minutes• LC occurs 4-5 per day

– Loss of Capacity

Page 5: ALCON LABS

Core Objectives

Primary objectives:

• Minimizing splits – line clearances and/or QA

• Maximizing utilization of fill rooms

Secondary objective:

• Optimizing the facility layout

• Optimizing the lot size (batch) or economic order quantity levels

Page 6: ALCON LABS

Core Objectives - Benefits

• Significant cost savings

• Improved uptime and process efficiency

• Improved capacity levels

• Improved overall throughput speed and other technical performance measures

• Reduced or eliminated inventory levels and other unnecessary costs

• Minimized idleness of employees (i.e. employee output efficiency)

Page 7: ALCON LABS

Action & Approach Plan

• Short-term perspective– Determine and measure Alcon Labs

Manufacturing processes to locate source of problem associated with LC• PAT and SMED method

• Long-term perspective– Converting 2-step process to inline

process• ProModel: Simulation Models

Page 8: ALCON LABS

Analysis of Situational Approach

Short-term approach

• Whitestock Line 1 & 2:– Observed and measured the “splits”

process steps for cycle time improvements

– Recorded the sequence of repeatable activities with measurable inputs, value-added activities, and measurable outputs

Page 9: ALCON LABS

Analysis of Situational Approach

Short-term approach• PAT Method• SMED Method

– Internal and External Setup activities– Improve cycle time or changeover/roll-over time

by reorganizing and reducing setup activities as well as resources and inventory waste and rescheduling production schedules for low quantity batches while sustaining high product quality

– Other benefits of setup reduction include lower cost (less inventory), better flexibility, better worker utilization, shorter lead time, increased capacity, and most importantly, less process variability

Page 10: ALCON LABS

Analysis of Situational Approach

• SMED Method: Process Flow chart

Page 11: ALCON LABS

Analysis of Situational Approach

• SMED Method: BENEFITS

Page 12: ALCON LABS

Analysis of Situational Approach

Long-term approach• Converting 2-step process to inline process• Observation & Data Collection

- process and layout,

- setup/changeover times,

- speeds and capacity, etc.

- ProModel Simulation software• Assumptions• Current Process Simulation Model• New Process Simulation Model

Page 13: ALCON LABS

Analysis of Situational Approach

Long-term approach• Variables/Functions

- locations

- entities

- network paths

- process/logic

- arrivals• product differentiation• setup downtimes

Page 14: ALCON LABS

Analysis of Situational Approach

Long-term approach: Assumptions• Setup times for each machine were calculated

using an average from the statistics provided.• Simulation models are programmed to run at

particular speed as opposed to individual actual speeds.

• Offline filling and storage time and activities are not accounted for in the simulation model.

• The proposed filler speeds and product specifics are assumed to be similar to the current equipment capabilities

• When locations and resources appear to be idle, setup downtimes are in occurrence.

Page 15: ALCON LABS

Analysis & Managerial Interpretation

Short-term Approach

Alcon Operation or Process steps

1) Staging (storage) area

2) Line area: inspection

3) Changeover

4) Production

5) Finished goods area

6) Reconciliation with Materials Office

Page 16: ALCON LABS

Analysis & Managerial Interpretation

Short-term Approach

• Changeover is the main cause for low efficiency.

• Steps in setup process– Preparation, after-process adjustments,

checking of materials and tools

– Mounting and removing blades, tools, parts

– Measurements, settings, and calibrations

– Trial runs and adjustments

Page 17: ALCON LABS

Analysis & Managerial Interpretation

Short-term Approach– Calibration and Trial Runs occupy a total of

85% of total time (changeover and LC time)!Alcon Labs Setup Time Allocation

10%

5%

20%

65%

Preparation

Mounting

Calibration

Trial Runs

Page 18: ALCON LABS

Analysis & Managerial Interpretation

Short-term Approach: • Changeover setup adjustments

1) Labelers

2) Cartoners

3) Magazines

4) Ink Jet Coder

5) Wrapper/Packaging

• Adjustments are made by trial-and-error as well as intuition

Page 19: ALCON LABS

Analysis & Managerial Interpretation

• Short-term Approach: Changeover

Page 20: ALCON LABS

Analysis & Managerial Interpretation

Short-term Approach:

• Other inefficiencies:– Incorrect Madrid Translations

– Disconnected communication across divisions

Page 21: ALCON LABS

Analysis & Managerial Interpretation

Long-term Approach:

• Decreased product handling and movement

• Increased flexibility and capabilities

• Increased utilization, productivity levels, and capacity

• Automated flex pack line

• Decreased downtimes

Page 22: ALCON LABS

Recommendations

Long-Term Solution• Recommend 1-year further analysis and

research

- costs

- equipment

- feasibility requirements

- build a more accurate model

- implementation

Page 23: ALCON LABS

Recommendations

Short-Term Solution• Strongly recommend forming a changeover team of

4-5 members1) Labelers

2) Cartoners

3) Magazines

4) Ink Jet Coder

5) Wrapper/Packaging

• Update changeover team regarding production schedules for advanced preparation

Page 24: ALCON LABS

Recommendations

Short-Term Solution

• Allocate secondary space for storage– Color code

• Next Raw materials – red (stop)

• Current Raw Materials and Finished product – green (go)

Page 25: ALCON LABS

Short-Term Solution• Streamline line clearance to a parallel process• Cross-train personnel

– Require employees to perform other functions in the changeover process

• Ensure prompt arrival of Bill of Materials– If items aren’t available, contingency plan should be

developed

• Improve coordination between Marketing, Planning, and Production divisions

• Function standardization• Replace bolts with one-time tighteners!• Mark individual calibration settings for each product on

each line for easy adjustments

Recommendations

Page 26: ALCON LABS

Questions?

• SMU TEAM ALCON– Benjamin Luong

– Chris Davis

– Cuong Ngo

– Cindy Nguyen

– Shanta Ramdhanny