Top Banner
Alcohol Screening and Intervention: Larry Gentilello, MD Professor of Surgery, Management, Policy, and Community Health University of Texas Dallas, Texas The Trauma Surgery Perspective
51

Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

Greg

The Trauma Surgery Perspective. Alcohol Screening and Intervention:. Larry Gentilello, MD Professor of Surgery, Management, Policy, and Community Health University of Texas Dallas, Texas. Alcohol-Related Mortality. 40,933. Injuries. (CDC - MMWR, 2004). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Larry Gentilello, MD

Professor of Surgery,

Management, Policy, and Community Health

University of Texas

Dallas, Texas

The Trauma Surgery Perspective

Page 2: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 3: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Alcohol-Related Mortality

34,833

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

All Chronic Diseases

(CDC - MMWR, 2004)

40,933

Injuries

Page 4: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Years of Potential Life Lost - YPLL’s

788,005

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

Alcohol - Related Diseases

(CDC - MMWR, 2004)

2,279,322

ChronicDisease

Injuries

Page 5: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Alcohol and Trauma

70%85%

27%

44% 49% 54% 65%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Fall MCA MVA Ped GSW DomViol

Stabs

(Gentilello, Am J Surg 1988)

Page 6: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Positive Alcohol Screens

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Ambulatory Medical

Inpatient Medical

Emergency Dept

Outpatient MentalHealthInpatient Psychiatry

Trauma Center

Page 7: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 8: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

(Gentilello, Am J Surgery, 1988)

Page 9: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 10: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Standard Practice

BAC 13%

CAGE 70%

MAST 81%

AUDIT 89%

instrument “not familiar with”• 87% reported no prior training in substance abuse

• 18% routinely screen BAC

• < 15% use questionnaires

• intervention or referral is rare

(Danielson, Gentilello, et al, Archives of Surgery, 1999)

Page 11: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 12: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Trauma Recidivism

• 5 year follow-up of 246 patients

– 40% readmission rate

– 20% mortality rate

– 77% of deaths due to continuing substance abuse

(Sims, et al, J Trauma)

Page 13: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 14: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 15: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Severity of Alcohol Problems

Harmful drinking/Abuse

Risky/Hazardous drinking

Safe drinking

abstinent

Dependent drinking/Alcoholism

severity

Page 16: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Brief Intervention Outcomes

0

20

40

60

80

100

baseline 3 6 9 12

CBT MET 12-Step

0

3

6

9

12

15

baseline 3 6 9 12

CBT MET 12-Step

percent days abstinent drinks per drinking day

1,735 patients

Page 17: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

(Miller WR, 1995)

Page 18: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Cost-Effectiveness

0%

100%

0 $ $$ $$$ $$$$

effectiveness

cost

Page 19: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

(Miller WR, 1995)

Page 20: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Types of Drinkers

Alcohol Dependent

~ 5 %

~ 25%

~ 70%

Risky or Harmful

Prevalence in US

.

No intervention

Goals

Low Risk orAbstinent

Brief Intervention

Drinking Pyramid

Referral to treatment

Page 21: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Do you think this patient will change

his drinking or reduce his risk as a

result of this conversation?

Page 22: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING

• No confrontation, labeling, stereotyping

• Ask open-ended questions

• Reflective listening to encourage talk about

drinking

• Offer information in a non-personal manner.

• Make connection between drinking and ED visit

• “What do you like about drinking?”

• “What do you like less about drinking?”

Page 23: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Hypothesis

Alcohol interventions as a routine component

of trauma care will reduce subsequent

alcohol intake, and decrease the

rate of trauma recidivism

Page 24: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Alcohol Interventions in a Trauma Center

• Study design– Harborview Medical Center, Seattle

– October 1994 to November 1997

– NIH sponsored RCT

– patients screened with BAC and questionnaire

– consent for follow-up only

– randomized

• 15 - 30 minute intervention plus follow-up letter

• standard trauma care

Page 25: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Follow-up

• Objective– Harborview ED records for one year after discharge

– statewide database of all trauma admissions

– police department records

– Department of Licensing records (motor vehicle)

• Self-report– 6 and 12 month patient interviews

– corroboration interviews with family members

Page 26: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 27: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Patient Enrollment

eligible trauma patients3,358

screened2,524

screened negative screened positive 1,371 (54%) 1,153 (46%)

randomized 762 (66%)

control intervention

396 366

Page 28: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Baseline Characteristics

intervention control

Age (years) 35.4 36.8

male 82 82

married 15% 14%

high school or less 53% 51%

employed 52% 48%

drug use 47% 53%

BAC (mean) 153 mg% 151 mg%

sMAST score >8 20% 15%

Page 29: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Trauma Recidivism - HMC

0.00

0.05

0.10

0 90 180 270 360

intervention control

days follow-up

injuryrecurrence

Page 30: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Trauma Recidivism - Statewide

0

0.025

0.05

0 250 500 750 1000

intervention control

injuryrecurrence

days follow-up

Page 31: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Changes in Alcohol Intake

0

-21.6

02.3

-17.9

-14.1

-25

-15

-5

5

15

25intervention control

6 month follow-up 12 month follow-up

(p = 0.01)

Page 32: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Changes in Alcohol Use at One Year

Intervention Control p

sMAST 3-8 - 22 + 2 0.01

Single/div/wid - 22 - 3 0.01

Married - 25 - 21 0.81

Unemployed - 26 - 1 0.03

Employed - 18 - 13 0.51

Prior ETOH Rx - 32 - 12.5 0.15

No Prior ETOH Rx - 16 + 16 < 0.01

Page 33: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Other Outcomes

any traffic violation

moving violation

DUI violation

any arrest

alcohol related arrest

.83

.84

.77

.56

.50

1.00 1.50 2.000.500.00

less frequent more frequent

Page 34: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 35: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 36: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Trauma Center Requirements

• Physical therapy

• Occupational therapy

• Vocational therapy

• Speech therapy

• Spinal chord therapy

• Nutritional therapy

• Play therapy

• Alcohol therapy?

Page 37: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 38: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Chapter 18- Prevention The trauma center must have a mechanism to identify patients who are problem drinkers. The trauma center must have a mechanism to provide an intervention for patients identified as problem drinkers.

Trauma Center Designation

Page 39: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 40: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 41: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 42: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Financial Costs in ColoradoFailure to do SBIRT in ER’s cost CO businesses and

residents $39 million each year in health care expenses

Estimated Annual Savings from Treating CO Emergency Patients for Alcohol Problems

*Goplerud E. et al. http://www.ensuringsolutions.org.

Page 43: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:
Page 44: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

• New codes published Nov 2 in 2008 CPT Manual

– 99408

• Alcohol and/or substance use structured screening (eg, AUDIT, DAST), and brief intervention (SBI) services; 15 to 30 minutes

– 99409   

• greater than 30 minutes

• Separate or added service

• Majority of major commercial health plans

agree to pay in 2008

2008 CPT

Common Procedure Terminology

Page 45: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

New CMS Codes for SBI

• New codes Medicaid codes

– H0049 Screening

– H0050 Brief Intervention

• New Medicare codes

– G0396 SBI > 15 minutes

– G0397 SBI > 30 minutes

Page 46: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Reimbursement for SBI

Payer Code Description Fee Schedule

Commercial Insurance

CPT 99408Alcohol and/or drug use structured screening and

brief intervention services; 15-30 minutes$33.41

CPT 99409Alcohol and/or drug use structured screening and

brief intervention services; greater than 30 minutes$65.51

Medicare

G 0396Alcohol and/or drug use structured screening and

brief intervention services; 15-30 minutes$29.42

G 0397Alcohol and/or drug use structured screening and

brief intervention services; greater than 30 minutes$57.69

Medicaid

H 0049 Alcohol and/or drug screening $24

H 0050Alcohol and/or drug service, brief intervention, per

15 minutes$48.00

Page 47: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

MONTANA

WYOMING IDAHO

WASHINGTON OREGON

NEVADA UTA

CALIFORNIA ARIZONA

NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOT NEBRASKA

COLORADO

NEW MEXICO

TEXAS

OKLAHOMA

KANSAS

ARKANSAS

LOUISIANA

MISSOURI

IOWA

MINNESOTA WISCONSIN

ILLINOIS INDIANA KENTUCKY

TENNESSEE

MISS ALABAMA

GEORGIA FLORIDA

SOUTH CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA WV

OHIO

MICHIGAN NEW YORK

PENN

MARYLAND DELAWARE

NEW JERSEY

CONN RI MASS

MAINE V

T NH

ALASKA

HAWAII

MONTANA

WYOMING IDAHO

WASHINGTON OREGON

NEVADA

UTAH

CALIFORNIA ARIZONA

NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA

COLORADO

NEW MEXICO

TEXAS

OKLA

KANSAS

ARKANSAS

LOUISIANA

MISSOURI

IOWA

MINNESOTA WISCONSIN

ILLINOIS INDIANA KENTUCKY

TENNESSEE

MISS ALABAMA

GEORGIA FLORIDA

SOUTH CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA WV

OHIO

MICHIGAN NEW YORK

PENN

MARYLAND DELAWARE

NEW JERSEY

CONN RI MASS

MAINE V

T NH

ALASKA

HAWAII

UPPL Status as of 2000Medicaid Code Adoption

States that have adopted H codes

States considering adoption of H codes

Page 48: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Joint Commission Undertakes Development of Standards for SBI

To further advance the expansion of the continuum of healthcare to include SBI, the

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (Joint Commission)

has decided to undertake the development of standards for screening and brief

intervention for alcohol and other drugs. The Joint Commission standards are

generally developed with input from healthcare professionals, providers, measurement

experts, consumers, government agencies and employers. As such, because of your

expertise on SBI, you are being asked to collaborate with the Joint Commission in the

development of standards and quality improvement for SBI.

Page 49: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Summary

• SBIRT prevents repeated injuries

• SBIRT saves money

• Trauma centers are the first to require SBIRT

• Billing codes are available

• Making it routine hospital care is next

Page 50: Alcohol Screening and Intervention:

Message to Trauma Patients

Make not thyself helpless drinking in

the beer shop, falling down.

Thy limbs will be broken, and no one

Will give thee a hand to help thee up

Egyptian Papyrus, 1500 BC

Page 51: Alcohol Screening and Intervention: