Albany, New York | Barcelona, Spain | Bangalore, India | awstruepower.com | +1 877-899-3463 ©2011 AWS Truepower, LLC MARACOOS 2012 Annual Meeting Baltimore,

Albany, New York | Barcelona, Spain | Bangalore, India | awstruepower.com | +1 877-899-3463©2011 AWS Truepower, LLC

MARACOOS 2012 Annual MeetingBaltimore, Maryland

1 November 2012

Matthew Filippelli, Lead Engineer

An overview of the US Offshore Wind Industry’s Met-ocean Data Needs and Applications


AlbanyNew York, USA

BarcelonaSpain

BangaloreIndia

• Over 100 professional staff• Experts in meteorology, spatial analysis,

environment, and engineering• Seasoned project managers and field

technicians

• Established in 1983; nearly 30 years of renewable energy industry experience

• Independent assessments on 60,000+ MW

• Project roles in over 80 countries

Company Snapshot


Overview

• Introduction• Data applications and users• Met-ocean data parameters• Measurement Approaches• Modeling Applications• Strategies to Address Data

Needs• Summary


©2011 AWS Truepower, LLC

Introduction• High-quality met-ocean data are essential to the successful initiation and

development of an offshore wind industry in the United States. • There is a scarcity of key atmospheric/ocean measurements that adds

both uncertainty and cost to the wind development process.• Current industry measurement and modeling practices are effective, but

would benefit from coordinated efforts on a regional and national scale. • Collaboration with met-ocean data stakeholders is essential.


Data Applications during Development

1. Siting- Feasibility Studies- Exclusion Area Definition- Project Boundary Definition

2. Assessment, Design & Permitting- Resource and Energy Projections- Met-Ocean Design Conditions- Geophysical Studies- Turbine Suitability- Foundation and BOS Design- Risk Assessment


Data Applications during Construction & Operation

3. Construction, Certification & Commissioning- Financing

- Insurance- Installation- Interconnection- Verification and Certification

4. Operations- O&M Plan Development- Production & Sea State Forecasting- Accessibility, Navigation, Safety

5. Decommissioning


Typical Met-ocean Data Users

Developers and OEMs

Banks, Investors & Insurance

Providers

Technical Experts & Researchers

Marine Engineers & Construction

Firms

0&M Providers and Human

Safety

Utilities/Grid Operators

Government Agencies & Regulators

Applications• Project Siting & Permitting• Energy Projections• Technology Design & Validation• Facility Design• Financing • Construction• Operations & Site Safety• Forecasting


Primary Data Parameters – Current and Historical

ATMOSPHERE WIND

MEANS, DIST., EXTREMES

SHEAR, VEER, TURBULENCE

ATMOSPHERIC STATE T, P, RH, PRECIP,

SOLAR STABILITY, LOW

LEVEL JETS

CLIMATOLOGY ICING LIGHTNING

Source: NREL


Primary Parameters – Current and Historical

SURFACE-SUBSURFACE WATER STATE & PROPERTIES

WATER TEMPERATURE

SALINITY

HYDROGRAPHIC WAVE HT, DIR,

FREQ CURRENT

PROFILES

BIOLOGIC MARINE

GROWTH

GEOLOGIC BOTTOM SOIL

TYPE


Conventional Measurement Approach• Project-specific focus on key parameters – hub height

winds and shear, atmospheric stability and turbulence• Onsite, bottom-fixed, tall mast with multiple

monitoring levels• Typically one mast per project with companion

platforms (ADCP, wave buoy)• Broadest acceptance and highest confidence

approach• Cost and permitting intensive• Increasingly impractical:

– Deeper waters– Higher hub heights

Source: http://w

ww

.NoordzeeW

ind.nl


Evolving Alternate Measurement Approaches• Lidar – vertical profiling & volume scanning

– Early performance returns from floating lidars are very positive; long term reliability not yet validated

• Enhanced use of satellite imagery, particularly SAR• Hybrid campaigns (tower and/or lidars plus buoys)

– Assumption: Define vertical profile and stability with one high-quality platform

– Characterize horizontal variations with buoys• High quality, regionally representative monitoring

stations• Banks/investors rely on precedent, internal

expertise, and on advice of independent consultants and test results


Challenges & Opportunities for Measurements

• Working solely on a project-scale is costly, time-consuming and data are often not broadly shared.

• Until recently, the need for more offshore measurement wasn’t seen as a national priority.

• Collaboration between wind industry and existing measurement and research community to leverage existing assets.

• Efforts underway on a national and regional scale to support offshore wind specific programs– DOE FOAs and CHLV2 efforts– state and university efforts


Modeling Applications

• Defining the atmospheric boundary layer structure & dynamics• Understanding land-sea and air-sea interactions; extreme events• Extrapolating and integrating sparse data in space and time• Simulating wake generation, meandering, interactions and impacts • Aerodynamic and hydrodynamic loading of turbine structures• Forecasting next-hour and next-day generation for grid management

Spatial Scales and Interfaces for Flow Modeling


Challenges & Opportunities for Modeling

• Need to improve model coupling (downscaling) to capture complex flow across scales

• Need to capture and model real ‘extreme’ wind datasets for turbine/foundation design & testing

• Models will benefit most from additional data for ingestion and validation, standardized measurements & data quality, and data sharing

• Collaboration between industry and research community is needed to ensure definition of user needs and widely useful results

• See DOE workshop report:http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/complex_flow_workshop_report.pdf

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/complex_flow_workshop_report.pdf


Strategies To Address Data Needs• Create a vision & plan for an offshore

metocean monitoring network• Multi-user investment in measurement

system definition, deployment and data sharing

• Accelerate testing/acceptance of new measurement technologies

• Target modeling capability improvements• Leverage existing resources within the

ocean observing community• See DOE report:

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/radc_public_meeting_914-11.pdf

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/complex_flow_workshop_report.pdf


Summary• The audience for offshore wind resource and design data is

diverse, and spans the life-cycle of development. • Current and near-term measurement approaches are effective,

but would benefit from coordinated development and deployment strategies.

• Improving model capability at different time and space scales is a priority – for a number of applications. A prerequisite is the availability of more input data, preferably meeting certain standards.

• Strategies for filling metocean data gaps require public/ private investment, technical innovation, and cooperation among key stakeholders.


Questions or comments?

[email protected]+1.518.213.0044 x 1015

THANK YOU

mailto:[email protected]

Albany, New York | Barcelona, Spain | Bangalore, India | awstruepower.com | +1 877-899-3463 ©2011 AWS Truepower, LLC MARACOOS 2012 Annual Meeting Baltimore,

Documents

aws truepower

design data needs

new york barcelona

ocean data stakeholders

spain bangalore

data needssummary albany

onshore wind offshore

offshore wind resource