Akka is Concurrency
Akka is Concurrency
Actors: Living objects with concurrent context
“I am for you, Alrik of Valt.”
Akka is Concurrency
Actors: Living objects with concurrent context
Futures: These aren’t Java’s Futures
val futureData = for { response <-‐ httpGet(…) query = response.body.as[Query] (img, text) <-‐ imageQuery(query) scaledImg <-‐ scaleImg(img) } yield NewPostData(text, scaledImg)
“I am for you, Alrik of Valt.”
Akka is Concurrency
Actors: Living objects with concurrent context
Futures: These aren’t Java’s Futures
val futureData = for { response <-‐ httpGet(…) query = response.body.as[Query] (img, text) <-‐ imageQuery(query) scaledImg <-‐ scaleImg(img) } yield NewPostData(text, scaledImg)
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
“I am for you, Alrik of Valt.”
Akka is Concurrency
Actors: Living objects with concurrent context
Futures: These aren’t Java’s Futures
val futureData = for { response <-‐ httpGet(…) query = response.body.as[Query] (img, text) <-‐ imageQuery(query) scaledImg <-‐ scaleImg(img) } yield NewPostData(text, scaledImg)
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Streams: Async Non-Blocking and Back-PressuredSource
Sink
Demand
Supply
Http too…
“I am for you, Alrik of Valt.”
Akka is Concurrency
Actors: Living objects with concurrent context
Futures: These aren’t Java’s Futures
val futureData = for { response <-‐ httpGet(…) query = response.body.as[Query] (img, text) <-‐ imageQuery(query) scaledImg <-‐ scaleImg(img) } yield NewPostData(text, scaledImg)
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Asynchronous
Streams: Async Non-Blocking and Back-PressuredSource
Sink
Demand
Supply
Http too…
“I am for you, Alrik of Valt.”
Support for Scala and Java (but use Scala, cuz…)
Actors: Concurrency in Isolation
Actors: Concurrency in Isolation
count: _alert: _score: _
Actors: Concurrency in Isolationcount: 2alert: Yscore: 16
count: 4alert: Nscore: 2
count: 33alert: Gscore: 71
count: 13alert: Gscore: 12
count: 7alert: Xscore: 5
count: 8alert: Nscore: 11
count: 2alert: Iscore: 14
count: 87alert: Gscore: 0
count: 1alert: Bscore: 6
count: 7alert: Wscore: 32
count: 7alert: Oscore: 19
count: 4alert: Gscore: 99
count: _alert: _score: _
✗Construct as many as you’d like
Actors: Concurrency in Isolationcount: 2alert: Yscore: 16
count: 4alert: Nscore: 2
count: 33alert: Gscore: 71
count: 13alert: Gscore: 12
count: 7alert: Xscore: 5
count: 8alert: Nscore: 11
count: 2alert: Iscore: 14
count: 87alert: Gscore: 0
count: 1alert: Bscore: 6
count: 7alert: Wscore: 32
count: 7alert: Oscore: 19
count: 4alert: Gscore: 99
count: _alert: _score: _
✗Construct as many as you’d like
✗Each one encapsulates its own state
Actors: Concurrency in Isolationcount: 2alert: Yscore: 16
count: 4alert: Nscore: 2
count: 33alert: Gscore: 71
count: 13alert: Gscore: 12
count: 7alert: Xscore: 5
count: 8alert: Nscore: 11
count: 2alert: Iscore: 14
count: 87alert: Gscore: 0
count: 1alert: Bscore: 6
count: 7alert: Wscore: 32
count: 7alert: Oscore: 19
count: 4alert: Gscore: 99
Thre
ad
Thre
ad
count: _alert: _score: _
✗Construct as many as you’d like
✗Each one encapsulates its own state
✗They all (can) share the same thread pool
Actors: Concurrency in Isolationcount: 2alert: Yscore: 16
count: 4alert: Nscore: 2
count: 33alert: Gscore: 71
count: 13alert: Gscore: 12
count: 7alert: Xscore: 5
count: 8alert: Nscore: 11
count: 2alert: Iscore: 14
count: 87alert: Gscore: 0
count: 1alert: Bscore: 6
count: 7alert: Wscore: 32
count: 7alert: Oscore: 19
count: 4alert: Gscore: 99
Thre
ad
Thre
ad
count: _alert: _score: _
✗Construct as many as you’d like
✗Each one encapsulates its own state
✗They all (can) share the same thread pool
✗They cannot interfere with each other
Actors: Concurrency in Isolationcount: 2alert: Yscore: 16
count: 4alert: Nscore: 2
count: 33alert: Gscore: 71
count: 8alert: Nscore: 11
count: 2alert: Iscore: 14
count: 87alert: Gscore: 0
count: 1alert: Bscore: 6
count: 7alert: Wscore: 32
count: 7alert: Oscore: 19
count: 4alert: Gscore: 99
Thre
ad
Thre
ad
count: _alert: _score: _
✗Construct as many as you’d like
✗Each one encapsulates its own state
✗They all (can) share the same thread pool
✗They cannot interfere with each other
✗Their life-cycles are entirely under your control
It’s all about the messages!
It’s all about the messages!
Actors have no public methods⦿ A
It’s all about the messages!
Actors have no public methods⦿
Actors have no publicly accessible data⦿
A B
It’s all about the messages!
Actors have no public methods⦿
Actors have no publicly accessible data⦿
You cannot communicate with Actors Synchronously⦿
A B
It’s all about the messages!
Actors have no public methods⦿
Actors have no publicly accessible data⦿
You cannot communicate with Actors Synchronously⦿
The only way to talk to them is with Messages⦿
A Bhey
It’s all about the messages!
Actors have no public methods⦿
Actors have no publicly accessible data⦿
You cannot communicate with Actors Synchronously⦿
The only way to talk to them is with Messages⦿
The only way to access their data is with Messages⦿
A B83
It’s all about the messages!
Actors have no public methods⦿
Actors have no publicly accessible data⦿
You cannot communicate with Actors Synchronously⦿
The only way to talk to them is with Messages⦿
The only way to access their data is with Messages⦿
Messages can (and should) carry conversational state⦿
A B
A
It’s all about the messages!
Actors have no public methods⦿
Actors have no publicly accessible data⦿
You cannot communicate with Actors Synchronously⦿
The only way to talk to them is with Messages⦿
The only way to access their data is with Messages⦿
Messages can (and should) carry conversational state⦿
A B
A
Done(a,b,c)
Actors are Fault Tolerant
Parent
Child Child Child
Mailbox
Mailbox
Mailbox Mailbox
Actors are Fault Tolerant
Actors supervise their childrenParent
Child Child Child
Mailbox
Mailbox
Mailbox Mailbox
Actors are Fault Tolerant
Actors supervise their children
Failed Actors are restarted (or stopped, or resumed, or escalated) by their supervisors
Parent
Child Child Child
Mailbox
Mailbox
Mailbox Mailbox
Actors are Fault Tolerant
Actors supervise their children
Failed Actors are restarted (or stopped, or resumed, or escalated) by their supervisors
Restarted Actors are given a fresh state
Parent
Child Child Child
Mailbox
Mailbox
Mailbox Mailbox
Actors are Fault Tolerant
Actors supervise their children
Failed Actors are restarted (or stopped, or resumed, or escalated) by their supervisors
Restarted Actors are given a fresh state
The message they were processing is lost
Parent
Child Child Child
Mailbox
Mailbox
Mailbox Mailbox
Actors are Fault Tolerant
Actors supervise their children
Failed Actors are restarted (or stopped, or resumed, or escalated) by their supervisors
Restarted Actors are given a fresh state
The message they were processing is lost
Parent
Child Child
Mailbox
Mailbox
Mailbox Mailbox
Child
Death is ActionableParent
Child ChildChild
Deathwatch
Mailbox
Death is Actionable❉ Restarting is invisible to outsiders…
❉ …But Actor Death is visible
❉ Deathwatch lets Actors react to death, such as to recreate a child
Parent
Child ChildChild
Deathwatch
Mailbox
Death is Actionable❉ Restarting is invisible to outsiders…
❉ …But Actor Death is visible
❉ Deathwatch lets Actors react to death, such as to recreate a child
Parent
ChildChildChild
Deathwatch
Mailbox
Death is Actionable❉ Restarting is invisible to outsiders…
❉ …But Actor Death is visible
❉ Deathwatch lets Actors react to death, such as to recreate a child
Parent
ChildChildChild
Deathwatch
Mailbox
❉… Or a transaction is complete, or it’s time to shut down, or a current stage of processing is finished, or…
Death is Actionable❉ Restarting is invisible to outsiders…
❉ …But Actor Death is visible
❉ Deathwatch lets Actors react to death, such as to recreate a child
Parent
ChildChildChild
Deathwatch
Mailbox
❉ Remember that this is death, so the mailbox contents are lost
❉… Or a transaction is complete, or it’s time to shut down, or a current stage of processing is finished, or…
So, why would I use Actors?
So, why would I use Actors?✗Actors help you manage concurrency Reasoning
So, why would I use Actors?✗Actors help you manage concurrency
✗Actors let you implement services within your system
Reasoning
Service decoupling
So, why would I use Actors?✗Actors help you manage concurrency
✗Actors let you implement services within your system
✗Actors let you design an entirely asynchronous system
Reasoning
Service decoupling
Capacity and Throughput
So, why would I use Actors?✗Actors help you manage concurrency
✗Actors let you implement services within your system
✗Actors let you design an entirely asynchronous system
✗Actors let you define the resiliency of your applications
Reasoning
Service decoupling
Capacity and Throughput
Fault Tolerance
So, why would I use Actors?✗Actors help you manage concurrency
✗Actors let you implement services within your system
✗Actors let you design an entirely asynchronous system
✗Actors let you define the resiliency of your applications
✗Eventual consistency, and message delivery failure are realities that Actors help you deal with throughout your code
Reasoning
Service decoupling
Capacity and Throughput
Fault Tolerance
Massive Scale
Self Healing
So, why would I use Actors?✗Actors help you manage concurrency
✗Actors let you implement services within your system
✗Actors let you design an entirely asynchronous system
✗Actors let you define the resiliency of your applications
✗Eventual consistency, and message delivery failure are realities that Actors help you deal with throughout your code
✗Most importantly, Actors help you think about the problem differently and express your solutions more creatively
Reasoning
Service decoupling
Capacity and Throughput
Fault Tolerance
Massive Scale
Self Healing
Sanity, Clarity, and Reasonability!!
“Functional” Futures
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
◎java.util.concurrent.Future is a bad Future. Akka gave us Futures that compose!
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
◎java.util.concurrent.Future is a bad Future. Akka gave us Futures that compose!
◎Composable Futures let us abstract over Future values, rather than wait for them
for {
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
◎java.util.concurrent.Future is a bad Future. Akka gave us Futures that compose!
◎Composable Futures let us abstract over Future values, rather than wait for them
for { a <- futureA()
futureA()
futureB(a)
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
◎java.util.concurrent.Future is a bad Future. Akka gave us Futures that compose!
◎Composable Futures let us abstract over Future values, rather than wait for them
for { a <- futureA() b <- futureB(a)
futureA()
futureC(a,b) futureB(a)
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
◎java.util.concurrent.Future is a bad Future. Akka gave us Futures that compose!
◎Composable Futures let us abstract over Future values, rather than wait for them
for { a <- futureA() b <- futureB(a) c <- futureC(a,b)
futureA()
futureC(a,b) futureB(a)
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
◎java.util.concurrent.Future is a bad Future. Akka gave us Futures that compose!
◎Composable Futures let us abstract over Future values, rather than wait for them
for { a <- futureA() b <- futureB(a) c <- futureC(a,b)} yield c
futureA()One
compo
sed
Future
futureC(a,b) futureB(a)
“Functional” Futures◎ A Future is just a value, but not yet…
◎java.util.concurrent.Future is a bad Future. Akka gave us Futures that compose!
◎Composable Futures let us abstract over Future values, rather than wait for them
for { a <- futureA() b <- futureB(a) c <- futureC(a,b)} yield c
futureA()
◎Futures compose as Monads compose, which makes them “standard” functional abstractions, and that’s a powerful thing
One c
ompose
d
Future
Abolish Callback Hell
Abolish Callback Hellpublic void restHandler(RESTRequest req) { idservice.validate(req.userInfo, new Callback<ValidateResult>() { public void run(ValidateResult result) { if (result.isValid) { db.getProfile(req.userId, new Callback<UserProfile>() { public void run(UserProfile profile) { picServer.get(profile.pic1, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p1) { picServer.get(profile.pic2, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p2) { picServer.get(profile.pic3, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p3) { picServer.get(profile.pic4, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p4) {
picServer.get(profile.pic5, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p5) {
twitterServer.getRecentActivity(req.userInfo, new Callback<TwitterActivity>() { public void run(TwitterActivity activity) {
req.sendResponse(pic1, pic2, pic3, pic4, pic5, activity)}
}}
}}
}}
}
Abolish Callback Hellpublic void restHandler(RESTRequest req) { idservice.validate(req.userInfo, new Callback<ValidateResult>() { public void run(ValidateResult result) { if (result.isValid) { db.getProfile(req.userId, new Callback<UserProfile>() { public void run(UserProfile profile) { picServer.get(profile.pic1, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p1) { picServer.get(profile.pic2, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p2) { picServer.get(profile.pic3, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p3) { picServer.get(profile.pic4, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p4) {
picServer.get(profile.pic5, new Callback<Pic>() { public void run(Pic p5) {
twitterServer.getRecentActivity(req.userInfo, new Callback<TwitterActivity>() { public void run(TwitterActivity activity) {
req.sendResponse(pic1, pic2, pic3, pic4, pic5, activity)}
}}
}}
}}
}
We didn’t handle errors
We didn’t handle timeouts
It’s not necessarily Threadsafe
It’s incredibly hard to read
Compose your Futuresimplicit val _timeout = Timeout(30.seconds) def restHandler(req: RESTRequest): Future[RESTResponse] = { val resp = for { validity <- idService.validate(req.userInfo) if validity.isValid profile <- db.getProfile(req.userId) pic1 <- picServer.get(profile.pic1) pic2 <- picServer.get(profile.pic2) pic3 <- picServer.get(profile.pic3) pic4 <- picServer.get(profile.pic4) pic5 <- picServer.get(profile.pic5) activity <- twitterServer.getRecentActivity(req.userInfo) } yield SuccessfulResponse(pic1, pic2, pic3, pic4, pic5, activity) resp recover { e: Throwable => FailedResponse(e) } }
Compose your Futuresimplicit val _timeout = Timeout(30.seconds) def restHandler(req: RESTRequest): Future[RESTResponse] = { val resp = for { validity <- idService.validate(req.userInfo) if validity.isValid profile <- db.getProfile(req.userId) pic1 <- picServer.get(profile.pic1) pic2 <- picServer.get(profile.pic2) pic3 <- picServer.get(profile.pic3) pic4 <- picServer.get(profile.pic4) pic5 <- picServer.get(profile.pic5) activity <- twitterServer.getRecentActivity(req.userInfo) } yield SuccessfulResponse(pic1, pic2, pic3, pic4, pic5, activity) resp recover { e: Throwable => FailedResponse(e) } }
Errors have been handled
Timeouts have been handled
It’s (probably) Threadsafe
I didn’t have to shrink the font
So why would I use Futures?
So why would I use Futures?
Asynchronous programming is still hard⦿
So why would I use Futures?
Asynchronous programming is still hard⦿
Programming synchronously isn’t a reasonable response⦿Thread starvation
timeoutscapacity is
suesthread thrashing
So why would I use Futures?
Asynchronous programming is still hard⦿
Programming synchronously isn’t a reasonable response⦿
Scala Futures embody asynchronous values⦿
Thread starvation
timeoutscapacity is
suesthread thrashing
Everything is a value
So why would I use Futures?
Asynchronous programming is still hard⦿
Programming synchronously isn’t a reasonable response⦿
Scala Futures embody asynchronous values⦿
They let us express composed asynchronous computation⦿
Thread starvation
timeoutscapacity is
suesthread thrashing
Everything is a value
Less Side Effects
So why would I use Futures?
Asynchronous programming is still hard⦿
Programming synchronously isn’t a reasonable response⦿
Scala Futures embody asynchronous values⦿
They let us express composed asynchronous computation⦿
Futures let us propagate errors and recover from them⦿
Thread starvation
timeoutscapacity is
suesthread thrashing
Everything is a value
Less Side Effects
Graceful Failure
Resiliency
So why would I use Futures?
Asynchronous programming is still hard⦿
Programming synchronously isn’t a reasonable response⦿
Scala Futures embody asynchronous values⦿
They let us express composed asynchronous computation⦿
Futures let us propagate errors and recover from them⦿
Asynchronous programming has always been possible but Futures now make it much more viable⦿
Thread starvation
timeoutscapacity is
suesthread thrashing
Everything is a value
Less Side Effects
Graceful Failure
Resiliency
Operating on Data Streams
Operating on Data Streams❉ In the real world, we communicate with things
NetworksDisks
Databases Services Slower Algorithms
Operating on Data Streams❉ In the real world, we communicate with things
NetworksDisks
Databases Services Slower Algorithms❉ Polling sucks. We live in a real time world.
Operating on Data Streams❉ In the real world, we communicate with things
NetworksDisks
Databases Services Slower Algorithms❉ Polling sucks. We live in a real time world.
❉ Eventing can be hard, since it doesn’t compose
Operating on Data Streams❉ In the real world, we communicate with things
NetworksDisks
Databases Services Slower Algorithms❉ Polling sucks. We live in a real time world.
❉ Eventing can be hard, since it doesn’t compose
❉ Throttling is a real problem we never address
Operating on Data Streams❉ In the real world, we communicate with things
NetworksDisks
Databases Services Slower Algorithms❉ Polling sucks. We live in a real time world.
❉ Eventing can be hard, since it doesn’t compose
❉ Throttling is a real problem we never address
❉ Akka Streams help us solve all of these problems
Operating on Data Streams❉ In the real world, we communicate with things
NetworksDisks
Databases Services Slower Algorithms❉ Polling sucks. We live in a real time world.
❉ Eventing can be hard, since it doesn’t compose
❉ Throttling is a real problem we never address
❉ Akka Streams help us solve all of these problems
Source
Transformation Flow
Transformation Flow
Sink
Demand
Supply
BackPressure is keySource
Sink
BackPressure is key◎ Fast producers can kill; we only have so much RAM
Source
Sink
BackPressure is key◎ Fast producers can kill; we only have so much RAM
◎ Producers can’t be artificially slow just to be nice
Source
Sink
BackPressure is key◎ Fast producers can kill; we only have so much RAM
◎ Producers can’t be artificially slow just to be nice
◎ Consumers signal demand, Producers signal supply
Source
Sink
BackPressure is key◎ Fast producers can kill; we only have so much RAM
◎ Producers can’t be artificially slow just to be nice
◎ Consumers signal demand, Producers signal supply
◎ When a consumer is slow, it signals no demand
Source
Sink
BackPressure is key◎ Fast producers can kill; we only have so much RAM
◎ Producers can’t be artificially slow just to be nice
◎ Consumers signal demand, Producers signal supply
◎ When a consumer is slow, it signals no demand
◎ When a producer is slow, it doesn’t supply
Source
Sink
BackPressure is key◎ Fast producers can kill; we only have so much RAM
◎ Producers can’t be artificially slow just to be nice
◎ Consumers signal demand, Producers signal supply
◎ When a consumer is slow, it signals no demand
◎ When a producer is slow, it doesn’t supply
Source
Sink Supply
Composable Binary Protocols
Composable Binary Protocols
FramerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
SerializerObject ByteString
BidiFlow
ChunkerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
Composable Binary Protocols
FramerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
SerializerObject ByteString
BidiFlow
ChunkerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
ApplicationObject Object
Source Sink
NetworkByteString ByteString
Source SinkBidiFlow
ByteStringObject
Composable Binary Protocols
FramerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
SerializerObject ByteString
BidiFlow
ChunkerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
ApplicationObject Object
Source Sink
NetworkByteString ByteString
Source SinkBidiFlow
ByteStringObject
✗Entirely reusable components that fit in any BiDirectional Flow
Composable Binary Protocols
FramerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
SerializerObject ByteString
BidiFlow
ChunkerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
ApplicationObject Object
Source Sink
NetworkByteString ByteString
Source SinkBidiFlow
ByteStringObject
✗Entirely reusable components that fit in any BiDirectional Flow
✗Type safe (or as type safe as byte string marshaling gets)
Composable Binary Protocols
FramerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
SerializerObject ByteString
BidiFlow
ChunkerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
ApplicationObject Object
Source Sink
NetworkByteString ByteString
Source SinkBidiFlow
ByteStringObject
✗Entirely reusable components that fit in any BiDirectional Flow
✗Type safe (or as type safe as byte string marshaling gets)
✗Entirely back pressured from end to end
Composable Binary Protocols
FramerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
SerializerObject ByteString
BidiFlow
ChunkerByteString ByteString
BidiFlow
ApplicationObject Object
Source Sink
NetworkByteString ByteString
Source SinkBidiFlow
ByteStringObject
✗Entirely reusable components that fit in any BiDirectional Flow
✗Type safe (or as type safe as byte string marshaling gets)
✗Entirely back pressured from end to end
✗ 100% event driven and reactive Realtime Speeds
No Blocking Threads
Natural Throttling
graceful performance degradationNot a Crash
Why Would I use Streams?
Why Would I use Streams?
Streaming is (probably) the crown jewel of Akka’s offering (but it’s a tough call)
Why Would I use Streams?
Streaming is (probably) the crown jewel of Akka’s offering
The need to respond to backpressure is real and we never do it !(but it’s a tough call)
Why Would I use Streams?
Streaming is (probably) the crown jewel of Akka’s offering
The need to respond to backpressure is real and we never do it
The need to treat our threads with respect is important
!!
(but it’s a tough call)
Why Would I use Streams?
Streaming is (probably) the crown jewel of Akka’s offering
The need to respond to backpressure is real and we never do it
The need to treat our threads with respect is important
The need to be reactive and fast is vital to the user experience
!!!
(but it’s a tough call)
Why Would I use Streams?
Streaming is (probably) the crown jewel of Akka’s offering
The need to respond to backpressure is real and we never do it
The need to treat our threads with respect is important
The need to be reactive and fast is vital to the user experience
Streams give us all of this and let us use our hardware to its fullest
!!!
! ! !
(but it’s a tough call)
Akka from 20k feetAkka from 20k feet
Akka from 20k feetAkka from 20k feet
Actors!Actors!Live Objects
Supervised
AsynchronousMessage Passing
ServicesState Machines
Network Ready
Akka from 20k feetAkka from 20k feet
Actors!Actors!
Futures!Futures!
Live Objects
Supervised
AsynchronousMessage Passing
ServicesState Machines
Network Ready
Composable Values
ReactiveMonadic
Immutable
Threadsafe
Work Well with Actors
Akka from 20k feetAkka from 20k feet
Actors!Actors!
Futures!Futures!
Streams!Streams!
Live Objects
Supervised
AsynchronousMessage Passing
ServicesState Machines
Network Ready
Composable Values
ReactiveMonadic
Immutable
Threadsafe
Work Well with Actors
BackPressured
Composable
Reusable
Event DrivenFlexible
Lots of Activity and Support
Work with Futures and Actors
Go Get AKKA!Go Get AKKA!Website: http://akka.io
Scala Reference: http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/scala.html
Java Reference: http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/java.html
Streams Reference: http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka-stream-and-http-experimental/current/scala.html
Derek Wyatt Twitter: @derekwyatt
Email: [email protected] 2015