Airway management :
Comparative study between McGrath VL and Airtraq OL
VS Macintosh laryngoscope in neutral neck position
Presented byAlaa Elsayed Goma
FalogyM.Sc. of Anaesthesia and surgical intensive care
Faculty of medicine Zagazig university
2016
Under supervision of
Prof; Ayman Abdel El-Salam Hassan
Professor of Anesthesia and surgical Intensive Care
Prof; Ahmed Abd El-Hakim Balata
Professor of Anesthesia and surgical Intensive Care
Prof; Khaled Mohammed El-
Sayed Professor of Anesthesia and surgical
Intensive Care
Research questionIfused by [experienced anesthiologists] managing a model of a difficult airway in form of neck immobilization by semi- rigid neck collarDo [ the Airtraq OL and the McGrath VL] Are [more safe and more effective in tracheal intubation ] when compared to [Classic Macintosh laryngoscope]?
Introduction
INTRODUCTION:• Airway management is a major challenge for
the anaesthesiologists in their everyday operative practice using direct laryngoscopy.
• During this direct laryngoscopy, positioning of the head and neck in
NEUTRAL POSITION will decrease chance of optimal laryngeal visualization which impair the line of sight
between laryngeal , pharyngeal and oral axes.
Concept of line of sight during direct laryngoscopy:
INTRODUCTION:• patients with cervical spine instability
who necessitate neck immobilization , airway management implies upon a high risk of neurological damage related to head and neck manipulation, so semi-rigid neck collar is applied in trail to control neck movement.
• Such immobilisation technique can turn intubation process under the direct laryngoscopy into more difficult situation (Impair the line of sight) .
INTRODUCTION:
INTRODUCTION:• These concerns have aroused the idea to
develop number of alternatives to classical Macintosh laryngoscope such as Airtraq ® OL, McGrath® Video laryngoscope.
• These laryngoscopes do not require the arrangement of pharyngeal, laryngeal and oral axis in one line of sight and thus do not require modulation of neutral position.
• During difficult airway situations, both Airtraq optical laryngoscope and McGrath Video laryngoscope sound to be better than Macintosh laryngoscope
AIM OF THE WORK To evaluate the efficacy and safety of :
in stimulated difficult intubation situations in patients with their cervical spine kept in
neutral position by semi-rigid neck collar as an
immobilization techniques .
VS
Neck extension During intubation may badly affects the cervical instability and this is may imply upon risk of spinal cord injury
NECK EXTENSION
Cervical spine stability: Cervical Stability: is the ability of the
spine to maintain strong relationships between vertebrae, so as not to damage the neural structures contained within the spinal column
Cervical instability: Excess translational
or rotational motion of any vertebra and means that the odontoid process is no longer firmly held against the back of the anterior arch of C1.
Concept of Videolaryngoscopy:
Video laryngoscopy (VL) is an update of high resolution micro-cameras systems that improves the success rate of intubation.
There is a hypothesis that improved lighting and a better view can increase the chance of intubation success.
Anaesthesia had used the miniature camera for many years but for only bronchial endoscopy .
Video Laryngoscopy in difficult Airway management:
McGrath Video-Laryngoscope
The McGrath Video Laryngoscope:
(Aircraft Medical, Edinburgh, United Kingdom) • A video-based system for tracheal
intubation that utilizes a video camera embedded into a camera stick.
• The unit is a battery powered Features a single electronic control
• Offers the user an image of the Glottis and the surrounding anatomy on a LCD screen.
• The unit which is used as a part of much the same way as common as Macintosh laryngoscope
Concept of the improved glottic view
Based upon the hypothesis that improved glottic view leads the better chance of successful intubation
AIRTRAQ Optical Laryngoscope
AIRTRAQ Optical Laryngoscope
based on refraction prism principle to give an angular view of the glottic area.
The blade of the Airtraq consists of two side by side channels.
One channel act as housing for the ETT, and the other channel terminates in terminal lenses and transmit back the image.
The viewed image is then been transmitted to a proximal eye piece viewfinder employing a prisms system and lenses not as basic concepts of usual fiberoptics.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
METHODOLOGY This was a prospective, randomized
clinical trial. group assignments (C, A and M) age group of 20-50 years, ASAps
Grades I or II undergoing elective surgery requiring general Anaesthesia
three groups of 50 patients each , of either sex.
All patients will receive standard monitoring according to ASA guidelines.
INTUBATION PROCEDURE
Intubation process was performed by one anesthesiologist with accepted experience in two recent video laryngoscopes under study.
A malleable stylet was used in both groups (Classical Macintosh and McGrath VL).
The technique was considered failed if tracheal intubation was not achieved within 120 seconds or within a maximum of three intubation attempts.
CORMACK & LEHANE SCORE
INTUBATION PROCEDURE
Intubation time was separated into T1 and T2.
T1 is the time between insertions of the allocated laryngoscope in the mouth until optimal glottic view including optimization maneuvers.
T2 is the time from optimal glottic view till confirmation of tracheal intubation (by vision) including removal of the device.
McGrath VL;INTUBATION
TECHNIQUES AND SEQUENCE
Intubation sequence by McGrath VL
With the patient in neutral position, Use left hand to introduce the VL into the midline of the oropharynx.
Push the blade tip till it past the posterior portion of the tongue.
Now, move eyes to the video screen in order to obtain the best view of the glottis.
The video image of the glottis now is representing Cormack – Lehane view.
Using video visualization, the ETT is then advanced on a smooth curve through the glottis mediated by styllet.
Intubation sequence by McGrath VL
Intubation sequence by McGrath VL
Intubation sequence by McGrath VL
AIRTRAQ OL;INTUBATION TECHNIQUES
AND SEQUENCE
Intubation sequence by Airtraq OL
Add lubricant to outer surface of the endotracheal tube and hosting channel of Airtraq OL.
Embed the tube into the side holding channel of the Airtraq so that the tip of the endotracheal tube is at the tip of the side channel.
Turn on the light for about 30-60 seconds before the procedure.
Intubation sequence by Airtraq OL
Hold the device in the mouth in the midline by right hand .
advance by sliding the device over the tongue.
check the image on view finder to optimize the view by moving the blade as necessary by left hand.
Be sure that the laryngeal inlet is in the centre of viewfinder just before pushing the ETT forward by right hand .
Intubation sequence by Airtraq OL
Intubation sequence by Airtraq OL
Intubation sequence by Airtraq OL
RESULTS OF THE
STUDY
COMPARISON BETWEEN GROUPS ARE DONE
ACCORDING TO: INTUBATION CONDITIONS
NUMBERS OF ATTEMPTS Optimization Procedures Cormack and Lehane score IDS
SUCCESS RATE OF INTUBATION TIME TO INTUBATION HEMODYNAMICS COMPLICATIONS
DEMOGRAPHIC AND AIRWAY ASSESSMENT
DATADemographic data Group C Group A Group M
p-value (Sig.) (N=50) (N=50) (N=50)
Age (in years) 35.90±7.65 35.92±7.70 35.16±7.72 0.856** (NS)
Male / Female 62 / 38 % 66 / 34 % 60 / 40 % 0.892* (NS)
Height (cm) 171.48±3.71 171.62±3.54 171.6±3.8 0.981** (NS)
Weight (Kg) 77.96±7.22 77.62±6.25 76.86±6.93 0.619** (NS)
BMI (Kg/m2) 26.84±2.29 27.06±2.05 26.14±2.13 0.095** (NS)
ASAps I / II 14 / 86 % 16 / 84 % 10/ 90 % 0.668* (NS)
MS I / II 56 / 44 % 48 / 52 % 62 / 38 % 0.369* (NS) TMD (cm) 7.18±0.34 7.12±0.34 7.17±0.32 0.766** (NS)
DEMOGRAPHIC AND AIRWAY ASSESSMENT
DATA
Non-Significant
RESULTS OF THE STUDY
numbers of attempts
Macintosh group
Airtraq group
McGrath group
HS
RESULTS OF THE STUDY Cormack-Lehane score in each
group
43
Airtraq almost get C&L I
Mac
into
sh le
ast i
n C
&LI
Most views of McGrath C&L II
Macintosh most C&L II
HIGHLY- SIGNIFICANT
RESULTS OF THE STUDY
IDS DISTRIBUTION
Airt
raq
end
in
IDS
2
McG
rath
end
s in
ID
S 4
Mac
into
sh e
nds
in
IDS
7
HIGHLY- SIGNIFICAN
T
RESULTS OF THE STUDY
SUCCESSFULNESS
45
Mac
into
sh h
as 4
fa
ilure
s
NON-SIGNIFICAN
T
RESULTS OF THE STUDY
SUCCESSFULNESS
FAMILARITY &
ADAPTATION
Post-hoc inter-group analysis
47
BETTER IMAGE
CONCEPT THOERY SA
ME
VID
EOSC
OPE
EF
FIEN
CY
FAMILARITY
NO NEED FOR
ALIGNMENT
AIRTRAQ LEAST
MACINTOSH MOST
When it comes to intubation time?
50
Aga
in ..
Fa
mili
arit
y
RESULTS OF THE STUDY Complications Occurrence
Sharp tip for both devices produce
more trauma
as primary insult more than
secondary injury
Styl
et
man
ipul
atio
n
LIMITATIONS DESIGN
operator knows the devices, which may also introduce bias. (solved by closed envelopes basis).
STIMULATIVEnot on real cervical trauma patients.
FURTHERMORE……… inter-incisor distance may be added in airway assessment parameters as pre and post insertion of neck collar especially because it affects primary insertion of Airtraq OL.
SUMMARY AND
CONCLUSION
The conclusion of this study proves that Airtraq OL and McGrath VL are: MORE EFFECTIVE AND SAFE Than Macintosh Laryngoscope in managing stimulated difficult intubation situation in form of cervical spine immobilization by semi-rigid neck collar
RECOMMENDATIONS
This study recommends use of videolaryngoscopes in our daily practice specially in difficult airway scenarios such as neck immobilization situations because it provide better airway management even without extensive training, and it is needed to conduct similar studies upon real cervical trauma patients for better assessment of its advantages and disadvantages.
I would like to thank….
Prof, Dr.: Salah A. Fattah Ismail
For his sincere effort to travel all this distance to give us this honor to be with us this special day
I would like to thank….
Prof, Dr.: Ahmed M. Salama
For his pleased acceptance to share us this discussion
I would like to thank…. My family that
suffered a lot through all this period of Ph.D. journey And they deserve all love and care
THANK YOU