Airpower Through the Cold War, Pt 2 1. Overview 2 Vietnam Rebuilding the Air and Space Force.

Airpower Through the Airpower Through the Cold War, Pt 2 Cold War, Pt 2

1

OverviewOverview

2

• Vietnam

• Rebuilding the Air and Space Force

Intro to VietnamIntro to Vietnam

3

General Causes of the War in Southeast AsiaGeneral Causes of the War in Southeast Asia

4

• Regional power vacuum existed in Southeast Asia after WW II

• South Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia politically unstable

• North Vietnam wanted to reunite North and South Vietnam under communist rule

• America wanted to prevent the spread of communism, by force if necessary

Gulf of Tonkin Resolution: August 1964Gulf of Tonkin Resolution: August 1964

5

• Passed by Congress 5 August 1964• Radically altered War in Southeast

Asia• Empowered President Johnson to…

• “take all necessary steps to repel armed attack against US forces”

• “take all necessary steps, including force, to assist S Vietnam and any member of SEATO”

• Committed US to fight for S. Vietnam

President Lyndon B. Johnson firmly believed in the use of military force to help achieve the country's foreign policy objectives and escalated American involvement in the Vietnam War.

Gulf of Tonkin to VietnamizationGulf of Tonkin to Vietnamization

6

US Build-Up: 1965 to 1968US Build-Up: 1965 to 1968

7

• March 1965—US Marines and Army arrive• Rolling Thunder bombing campaign began

• By 1969, US troop strength reached 543,000 (500,000 supported the war from other Asian countries and Pacific bases)

• US became heavily involved in fighting a guerrilla war for which we were not prepared

• 30 Jan 1968—North Vietnam launched Tet Offensive

Horner 1Horner 1

8

Events Surrounding the Paris Peace TalksEvents Surrounding the Paris Peace Talks

9

• Talks began in 1968; achieved nothing– North Vietnam knew time was on its side

• US units continued to withdraw from Vietnam– By 1972, 200,000 US troops had left

• March 1972—North Vietnam launched Easter Offensive against South Vietnam– Attack repelled by US airpower

(Linebacker I)

Events Surrounding the Paris Peace Talks (cont’d)Events Surrounding the Paris Peace Talks (cont’d)

10

• Talks resumed following Easter Offensive; again, little movement occurred

• Late 1972—Nixon ordered massive bombing of North Vietnam (Linebacker II)

• Linebacker II forced the North to negotiate in earnest

• 27 Jan 1973—Peace Accords signed– Called for United States to withdraw all

units by Mar 1973

Linebacker II and BeyondLinebacker II and Beyond

11

The Fall of South VietnamThe Fall of South Vietnam

12

• Between 1973 and 1975, North Vietnam continued to build strength in violation of Peace Accords

• Nixon was preoccupied with the Watergate scandal

• US Congress tired of Vietnam and refused to help

• Feb 1975—North Vietnam launched the Ho Chi Minh campaign against South Vietnam– South Vietnam was easily defeated without

US air support– Laos and Cambodia fell quickly thereafter

Uses of Airpower: BackgroundUses of Airpower: Background

13

• Vietnam War was primarily a land war – Most air power was used in conjunction with

ground ops

• North stayed above DMZ, so air superiority over the South was never a concern

• In-country operations centered around– Interdiction

– Close Air Support (CAS)

– Airlift

– Reconnaissance

– Search and Rescue (SAR)

– Air-to-Air Refueling

– Command and Control (C2)

In-Country Air Operations: 1964-73In-Country Air Operations: 1964-73

14

• After Gulf of Tonkin, airair units built up rapidly

• USAF occupied 10 major air bases– All built and defended by the Air

Force– Huge logistical effort

• USAF also flew from six bases in Thailand

• Navy flew from carriers in Gulf of Tonkin

• B-52s flew from Guam; at times even from the United States

Uses of Airpower during VietnamizationUses of Airpower during Vietnamization

15

• Train South Vietnamese Air Force (VNAF)

• Support South Vietnamese Army

• Prevent enemy attacks against withdrawing American units

Uses of Airpower: InterdictionUses of Airpower: Interdiction

16

• Major mission during SEA war• Aircraft used: F-4 Phantom,

F-100 Super Sabre, F-105 Thunderchief (Thud), AC-130 Gunships

• B-52—nuclear bomber modified to carry conventional weapons—was best known interdiction aircraft– Arc Light: Name for B-52

interdiction missions

F-100 SupersabreF-100 Supersabre

Uses of Airpower: Close Air Support (CAS)Uses of Airpower: Close Air Support (CAS)

17

A-4 SkyhawkA-4 Skyhawk

A-1 SkyraiderA-1 Skyraider

• Missions to support forces on the ground

• Aircraft used

• Gunships—cargo aircraft armed with rapid-fire machine guns—were very effective

• Forward Air Controllers (FACs) were used to locate the enemy and mark targets for faster flying jets

• B-52 Arc Light aircraft were occasionally used for close air support

– Used extensively in close air support at Khe Sanh• Flew 2,548 sorties

• Dropped bombs within 300 yards of US Marine perimeter

– Credited with saving Khe Sanh and repelling the Tet and Easter Offensives

Uses of Airpower: Close Air Support (cont’d)Uses of Airpower: Close Air Support (cont’d)

18

Uses of Airpower: Tactical AirliftUses of Airpower: Tactical Airlift

19

• Vital to successful US operations because of poor security on roads

• Aircraft used—UH-1 Hueys, C-7 Caribous, C-123 Providers, and C-130 Hercules

• Missions often flown while under attack

• Supplies often air-dropped because of enemy fire and poor landing facilities

• A major factor in keeping Khe Sanh alive

C-123 ProviderC-123 Provider C-7 CaribouC-7 Caribou

Uses of Airpower: ReconnaissanceUses of Airpower: Reconnaissance

20

• Aircraft used—RF-4C, RB-57 Canberra, and RB-66 Destroyers

• Aircraft were equipped with variety of cameras and sensing devices

• Missions—Locating lucrative targets and assessing battle damage

• Valuable player in repelling Tet and protecting Khe Sanh

RB 66 DestroyerRB 66 DestroyerRB 57 CanberraRB 57 Canberra

Uses of Airpower: Search and Rescue (SAR)Uses of Airpower: Search and Rescue (SAR)

21

• Extremely important part of air support mission throughout Southeast Asia

• Strengthened aircrew morale; fliers knew every effort would be made to save them if shot down

• Aircraft used—HH-3 Jolly Green Giants and HH-53 Super Jolly Greens

• By 1973, USAF had rescued 3,883 Americans

Uses of Airpower: Air-to-Air RefuelingUses of Airpower: Air-to-Air Refueling

22

• Indispensable! Extended range of combat aircraft and enabled many to return safely

• C-130s refueled helicopters; KC-135s refueled fixed- wing aircraft

• Strategic Air Command tankers flew 195,000 sorties, unloaded 9 billion pounds of fuel, and took part in 814,000 individual refuelings

Major Campaigns: Rolling ThunderMajor Campaigns: Rolling Thunder

23

• Officially began 2 March 1965• Objectives

• Interdict flow of supplies from the North

• Force the North to stop supporting Vietcong and quit the war

• Raise South Vietnamese morale

RF 4 PhantomRF 4 Phantom

Rolling Thunder (cont’d)Rolling Thunder (cont’d)

24

• Strategic bombing and interdiction campaign• Strategic because it was aimed at the North’s will to wage war

• Interdiction because the North had few large industries and got most of their material from China and the Soviet Union

• Employed mostly tactical aircraft: F-105s, F-4s, and F-111s. In 1966, B-52s were used in southern part of North Vietnam

F-111F-111F-105F-105

Rolling Thunder: RestrictionsRolling Thunder: Restrictions

25

• Johnson administration controlled campaign tightly

• Targets declared off limits by civilians included…• Targets in Hanoi, Haiphong, China border area• MiG bases and nonfiring SAM sites • Dams, dikes, hydroelectric plants

• White House selected targets, weapons, and flying routes with little military input

• Graduated increases in bombing intensity worked to advantage of N. Vietnamese– Gave them time to recover from damage

– Enabled them to establish world’s most intense antiaircraft defense system

– Provided them will to fight on and a sense they could survive

• By 1965, it was clear that Rolling Thunder did not work!

Rolling Thunder: Effect of RestrictionsRolling Thunder: Effect of Restrictions

26

• Impacts– South’s morale improved as the North

suffered under bombing

– North used frequent halts and restrictions to repair damage and resupply forces in South

– Criticism grew at home and internationally

• Johnson ended Rolling Thunder prior to 1968 elections

• Rolling Thunder campaign, America’s longest, was a failure

Rolling Thunder: ConclusionsRolling Thunder: Conclusions

27

Major Campaigns: Linebacker IMajor Campaigns: Linebacker I

28

• Easter Offensive (Mar 1972) made it apparent the North was not willing to negotiate

• Objectives of Linebacker I – Initially—Close air support effort to aid retreating

South Vietnamese forces

– Later—Changed to interdiction campaign against North Vietnam

– Unlike Rolling Thunder, a systematic campaign with little civilian control

B 52 Stratofortress

Linebacker I (cont’d)Linebacker I (cont’d)

29

• Civilian casualties a consideration, but not the determiner of how missions were flown

• Haiphong harbor mined for first time to restrict delivery of supplies to the North

• Strikes flown over Hanoi and Haiphong

• B-52 strikes on Haiphong began in April 1972

• “Smart bombs” used extensively

Linebacker I: SuccessesLinebacker I: Successes

30

• Linebacker I was the most successful US bombing campaign of the war– Had more impact on the North in 9 months than

Rolling Thunder did in 4 years

• Successful largely because Easter Offensive was a conventional, mechanized attack

• Peace Talks resumed in July 1972 – Nixon restricted Linebacker I attacks to below the

20th parallel

Major Campaigns: Linebacker IIMajor Campaigns: Linebacker II

31

• Peace Talks stalled again in Dec 1972• Nixon ordered Linebacker II to run concurrently

with Linebacker I• Purpose of Linebacker II—Force the North

Vietnamese to negotiate and sign peace treaty• Ran from 18 Dec to 30 Dec 1972; referred to as

“The Christmas Campaign”

Linebacker II (cont’d)Linebacker II (cont’d)

32

• Very intense and logistically complex• Specific targets in Hanoi and Haiphong• B-52s used for first time over Hanoi• By end of Linebacker II, N. Vietnam was

defenseless

– 1,200 SAMs were fired

– 80% of the North’s electrical systems and 25% of their POL facilities were destroyed

Linebacker II: ResultsLinebacker II: Results

33

• North Vietnam returned to the bargaining table on 30 Dec 1972

• All bombing ceased on 15 Jan 1973

• Peace treaty was signed on 27 Jan 1973

• Linebacker II was a success

• Some believe that if Rolling Thunder had been conducted like Linebacker II, the war would have ended in 1965—unlikely

Interim SummaryInterim Summary

34

• Uses of Airpower• Rolling Thunder• Linebacker I• Linebacker II

Vietnam Service MedalVietnam Service Medal

Post VietnamPost Vietnam

Vietnam War ResultsVietnam War Results

36

• US reluctance to enter military conflicts that don’t directly threaten national interests

• Congressional restriction on President’s ability to commit US military forces

• Lowered public opinion of government and military

• The all-volunteer military force

• Increased emphasis on military resources, training, and weapons

Results for Southeast AsiaResults for Southeast Asia

37

• North Vietnam and South Vietnam joined into one country dominated by North Vietnamese communists

• Saigon renamed Ho Chi Minh City

• Exodus of boat people, many to America

• Hundreds of thousands of US supporters sent to "reeducation" camps

• Over 6.5 million displaced Vietnamese war refugees

• Expected postwar blood bath never materialized

• US can’t win a counterinsurgency war in another country; only people of that country can

• Force and technology of limited value in a “people’s war”

• Realistic assessments by national leaders required before forces are committed

• “Know your enemy and know yourself”

• “Graduated Response” is an ineffective way to employ airpower

The Vietnam War: Lessons LearnedThe Vietnam War: Lessons Learned

38

• In a democracy, congressional and public support are critical and difficult to get

• Modern war is open to public scrutiny

• Let those who understand war conduct it

• Need for revolutionary not evolutionary technology

• Need for precision munitions

Lessons Learned (cont’d)Lessons Learned (cont’d)

39

• So, what have we learned?

–What were significant airpower achievements and changes during this period?

–What was the impact of these achievements and changes?

Evolution of AirpowerEvolution of Airpower

Rebuilding the Rebuilding the Air and Space Air and Space

ForceForce41

Rebuilding for Air and Space VideoRebuilding for Air and Space Video

42

• Two key fighters developed

– McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle

– General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

• Close Air Support led to A-10 Thunderbolt

• Rockwell B-1B Lancer

• Boeing E-3 Sentry (AWACS)

• Peacekeeper Missile 43

Weapon SystemsWeapon Systems

44

• Stealth aircraft– Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

– Northrop B-2 Spirit

• New airlifter– McDonnell Douglas C-17

Globemaster

• Boeing/Grumman E-8 Joint STARS

• New advanced fighter– Lockheed Martin F-22

Second Generation WeaponsSecond Generation Weapons

45

Boyd 1Boyd 1

Military Operations Military Operations in the 1980s in the 1980s

46

GrenadaGrenada

47

• Prime Minister killed in coup in 1983; increased Russian/Cuban influence

• US Objectives– Protect US citizens—1000 medical students

– Neutralize hostile Grenadian/Cuban elements

– Restore legitimate government

• Operation URGENT FURY– Army Rangers and 82d Airborne Division

– Supported by USAF resources

Grenada (cont’d)Grenada (cont’d)

48

• Lessons Learned– All services must plan and coordinate jointly

before operation occurs

– Applying overwhelming force quickly is key to victory

49

James VideoJames Video

LibyaLibya

50

• Muammar Qaddafi linked to terrorism; specifically, bombing of disco in Berlin

• Libyan targets struck in April 1986• Operation EL DORADO CANYON– Air Force F-111s

– Navy and Marine aircraft

– Four of five main targets severely damaged

Libya (cont’d)Libya (cont’d)

51

• Lessons Learned– Superb joint coordination

– United States able to strike terrorists when targets identified

– United States willing to strike terrorist targets

PanamaPanama

52

• General Noriega– Indicted on drug trafficking charges

– US forces harassed in the Canal Zone

– Implied threats to security of the Canal

– Marine Lieutenant killed in an incident

• President George H.W. Bush ordered Operation JUST CAUSE

Panama (cont’d)Panama (cont’d)

53

• Objectives of Operation JUST CAUSE• Remove Noriega from power

• Safeguard Panama Canal

• Restore democratic government in Panama

• JUST CAUSE began 20 December 1989• AC-130 Spectre gunships used

• First use of F-117

• Noriega surrenders after seeking refuge in Vatican embassy

Panama (cont’d)Panama (cont’d)

54

• Lessons Learned• Strike quickly with overwhelming force

using mobility, surprise, and precision

• Army and Marines recognized need for light deployable forces

• Joint coordination had vastly improved since Grenada

SummarySummary

55

• Vietnam

• Rebuilding the Air and Space Force