Aircraft Noise and Child Development: An Environmental Health Risk Assessment NSCEH Student Project Nov 2005
Nov 10, 2014
Aircraft Noise and Child Development: An
Environmental Health Risk Assessment
NSCEH Student Project Nov 2005
The Identified Issue• Has aircraft noise affected, or likely to affect, the
cognitive development of children, in a school of 200, located under the flight path?
• If yes, what is the level of risk and what recommendations can be provided to the school population and authorities?
• Airport due for expansion• Recent school academic results indicated a six month delay
compared to state average• Parents extremely concerned about test scores, and the
potential impact of aircraft environmental noise on their children’s reading skills, attention, memory, thinking
ability and general health • Risk Assessment undertaken by local scientists in consultation with school, PTA and authorities
Process Undertaken• Hazard Identification
– Noise health effects & researched evidence
• Dose Response– Response of children to noise levels
• Exposure Assessment– Means and level of exposure by the children
• Risk Characterisation– Integration of information to assess risk; explanation of
confounders, uncertainties & limitations
• Risk Management & Communication– Recommendations & communication plan
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
Aircraft Noise - affecting children's cognitive performance?
Adverse effect of noise…….?
WHO DEFINITION:“a change in the morphology and physiology of an organism
that results in”:
• Impaired functional capacity, or• Impaired capacity to compensate for additional stress, or • Increase in susceptibility of an organism to the harmful
effects of other environmental influences.
This definition includes any temporary or long-term lowering of the physical, psychological or social functioning of humans or human organs.”
Health Effects from Noise
• Hearing • Annoyance
• Sleep disturbance
• Stress / Hormonal
• Cardiovascular effect
• Communication
• Auditory discrimination
• Speech perception
• Sense of well-being
• Concentration
• Impairs cognitive performance
• Reduces task performance
• Diminishes memory
• Motivation
Comparative noise levelsQuiet conversation 50 – 60dB(A)
Vacuum Cleaner 70dB(A)
Aircraft 87 – 100dB(A)
Take Off / Landing
MP3 Headphones 94dB(A)
Rock Band 120 – 150dB(A)
85dB(A)
Noise - Health Effects on Children
• Vulnerable group @ 5 – 11 years– Critical stage in cognitive development. – Less coping mechanisms for additional stressors– Reading and language acquisition – complex cognitive tasks
• Physiological and Psychological Effects
• Noise affects the ability to perform complex cognitive tasks due to:– Communication - auditory discrimination & speech perception– Distraction – sustained attention, memory and recall– Fatigue – sleep disturbance
“reading, attention, problem solving and memory are most strongly affected by noise” (WHO)
Evidence – related studies
• Los Angeles Airport Study (Cohen et al, 1980, 1981)
• New York Airport City (Evans & Maxwell, 1997)
• Munich Airport Study (Evans et al, 1995; 1998)
• Heathrow Studies (Haines et al, 2001 a,b,c; 2002)
“Over 20 studies have reported that noise adversely affects children’s academic performance”
Stansfield S (2004), ‘Review on state of the art in children and noise”, 3rd International Conference on Children’s Health and the Environment, Centre for Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London
DOSE RESPONSE
Aircraft Noise - affecting children's cognitive performance?
Dose-response
Noise location dBLAeq16hr, 6am-10pm
Outside 50-55
Inside 35
Table 1: Noise levels in a classroom below which health effects would not be expected
Source: Berglund et al (1999)
Source: Stansfeld et al (2005)
Relationship of Test Scores to Noise
Source: Hygge, Evans and Bullinger (2002)
Comparison of Test Scores pre/post Airport Closure (ie:Noise Removal)
• “Stimuli context effect”– Impact of noise range, duration and time
between noise– Annoyance with noise greater when exposed
to loud noise intermittently, lesser when noise constant.
– (Aasvneg and Engdahl, 1999)
• Aircraft noise levels above 50 dB(A) in a classroom can affect performance
EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
Aircraft Noise - affecting children's cognitive performance?
Exposure Assessment• Exposure route is auditory
• Disruption caused by aircraft is a key factor in this issue
• Health effects above 70db(A)
• Range : between 85.7 - 100.8 dB(A)
Model representing noise effects
noise exposure
speech perception
impaired reading
predictor mechanism outcome
• Exposure measured using noise loggers, questionnaires, tape recordings
– NB: Loggers require calibration, so data interpretation may also be influenced by position and other environmental noises (traffic, wind, playground)
RISK CHARACTERISATION
Aircraft Noise - affecting children's cognitive performance?
• Average number of flights/day = 19.5 (1/hr)• Aircraft noise impact ~ 15 sec/flight
Relationship between Aircraft Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF) Level
and Community Reaction in
Residential Areas
(National Acoustic Laboratories Report No 88)
• Increased air traffic has potential to adversely affect reading results, anxiety levels, affecting children, parents, school staff and other local population
• Potential costs associated with long-term noise exposure include:– remedial education, – decreased cognitive development – decreased attention – health costs
Potential Costs
Risk Uncertainty
Assumptions: • All flights pass over the school
Risk Assessment Limitations:• Interpretation of noise data-contribution affected by noise logger location, and other noise sources• Questionnaires highly subjective• Data from one school (200 pupils) – no control
• Climate - wind, humidity etc affect sound transmission in the air
Risk Uncertainty Confounding Factors:
• Unknown other factors include:
– socio-demographics,
– excess noise in home setting,
– other chemical/biological factors (eg: Pb),
– children’s hyperactivity / developmental disability,
– teacher quality
• Other sources of environmental noise at the school include road traffic, other classrooms
• Flight paths are affected by wind direction
RISK MANAGEMENT
Aircraft Noise - affecting children's cognitive performance?
Evidence Findings• Sufficient evidence indicates that noise has a
negative effect on cognitive performance.
• However, it is uncertain whether the current school performance can be directly attributed to aircraft noise:
– Existence of confounding factors and data limitations
– A lack of control studies in the local situation and lack of evidence about prior test results
– Insufficient evidence on effects of combined noise (WHO)
• Risk management is recommended to address relevant standards
Site Plan of St Stephens SchoolM
ain
Sou
th
Roa
d
Henley Beach Road
Wes
t W
ing
South Wing
North Wing
Hall
90dBA
Noise Control RecommendationsExisting Noise Measurements
100dBA
90dBA
AS2021-2000 Table 3.3 Design Noise Level = 50dBA
Noise Level MeasurementsDuring Aircraft FlyoverSouth Wing: 90dBANorth Wing: 90dBAWest Wing: 90dBAHall: 95dBA
Noise Levels while Semi-Trailer on South RoadSouth : 75dBANorth : 75dBAWest: 85dBAHall: 65dBA
Noise Control Recommendations
100dBA
50dBA90dBA
Noise Control Data and SolutionControl Description ANR
dBA$ Responsibility
Ceiling Insulation
High Density Insulation Batts laid on existing ceiling
30 $15/m2 School & PTA
Roof Insulation
Acoustic frame consisting of insulation and battens
30 $25/m2 Commonwealth Government Grant
Double Glazed Windows and Doors
Additional windows added to create double glazing, or replace existing windows and doors.
35 $150/ unit
Commonwealth Government Grant
Screen Wall
Single brick wall 115mm Thick rendered one side.
45 $100/m School & PTA
Risk Management &
Communication• Formation of an ad hoc group involving EPA,
Health, AAL, Commonwealth Government, and school representatives.
• Further monitoring to be co-ordinated by this group throughout the remediation process
• Proposed communication strategy– Letter to parents informing them of school information session
– Notice of information evening to be advertised in community media
– School information session to explain situation and future plans
– Parents to receive regular updates on remediation status of school
– Fact sheet to be made available to media
Questions?
Team:
Alison Jones, Xiao Liu
Colin Marsh, Lester Nation
Graham Ohmsen, Louise Miller-Frost, Barry Mortimer
Peter Collins, Kirsten
Supported by:
Hannah Aumann and A/Prof Dino Pisaniello