7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
1/64
C
P
E
68
1
1. GRAVITIONALSETTLINGRASHIDI BIN MUHAMAD
MOHD FAHIMI AB RASHID
MOHD SAZALI BIN AHMAD
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
2/64
Simple particulatecollection device
The principle ofgravity to settlethe particulate
matter
In a gas streampassing throughits long chamber
Gravitational
Settling
SpecificationGravitational
Settling
To remove large,abrasive particulates
of size 50 m.
Usually velocity
through settling0.5-2.5 m/s.Size less 50 m-largesettling chamber andlong residence time.
INTRODUCTION
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
3/64
HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS???
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
4/64
Advantage Disadvantage Economic Durability Applicability Efficiency
Low pressure loss Much space
require
Low design
cost
Durable-no
moving
partrequired
< 50 m not
practical
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
5/64
Gravitational Settling
Settling properties. Stokes Law (for a particle falling in a fluid due togravity, frictional force balance gravity force settling velocity)
vt = terminal settling velocity, m/s
g = gravitational constant, m/s2
p = density of particle, kg/m3
Pa = density of air, kg/m3
(approx. 1.2 kg/m3
)Dp = diameter of particle, m
= viscosity of air, N.s/m2
Applies for PM (0.1-100micron) when Re is less than one
18
)(2
pap
t
dgv
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
6/64
Gravitational settling design chamber
H = height of settling chamber, m
Vh=horizontal flow-through velocity, v/m
L =length of settling chamber, m
*Solving equation 2 for dp will give the largest particlesize that can be removed with 100% efficiency
18
)(2
pap
ht
hdg
L
Hvv
L
Hv
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
7/64
2.
CYCLONE
Suitable for
coarse particle Most common:
Reverse flow
High efficiencydesign
- High recoveries
- Small inlet and outlet
orifices
High rate design
- Lower total efficiencies
- Lower resistance to flow,
hence higher gas
capacity
Fareed-Genevie-Elyzawerni
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
8/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
9/64
Advantage
o Low capital cost
o Ability to operate at high temperatures
o Low maintenance requirements
Disadvantage
o Low efficiencies
o High operating costs
o Limited to dry particles
Efficiency
o Efficiency is a function of the physical parameters of the application andthe design parameters of the cyclone. Cyclone efficiency increases with:
a) Coarse particle size distribution
b) A decrease in cyclone diameter.
c) Smaller outlet diameter. An increase in pressure drop also results.
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
10/64
Durability of cyclone
o Stable pressure drop for a given gas flow
o Constant efficiency for a given particulate condition
o No moving parts; no replaceable filterso Ability to handle extremely high dust concentration
o High temperature capability
Economic Consideration
o
Eliminating the need to replace expensive filters and expose maintenanceworkers while doing so.
o A simple, short duct system makes for maximum efficiency.
o Operating costs increase with efficiency.
Industrial Application
o Cyclone Dust collector Excellent choice for industrial process areas that have high levels of dust and
airborne irritants.
Efficiently clean the air in work areas to capture and remove the dust createdby your process.
Woodworking, Metalworking, Chemical processing, Paper scrap, Recycling
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
11/64
Cyclones
Magnitude of centrifugal force generated
Fc= centrifugal force, N
Mp= particulate mass, kg
Vi = partical velocity ,m/s
R = radius of cyclone, mTerm v/R = centrifugal acceleration
* Refer handout for typical cyclone dimensions
R
vMF ipc
2
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
12/64
Cyclones
Collection efficiency with respect to particle size. Reference particlesize is taken as the particle that will be removed with 50% efficiencyon a weight basis given by:
d50= diameter of particle collected with 50% efficiency
= gas viscosity, kg/m.sb=width of cyclone inlet, m
Ne=number of effective turns within the cyclone
Vi=inlet gas velocity, m/s
p = density of particulate matter, kg/m3
1.EQvN2
b9d
2/1
pie
50
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
13/64
Example: Air stream with flow rate 7m3/s, passed through a cyclone of stdproportions. Diameter of the cyclone is 2.0m and air temperature is 77 oC.Given air viscosity 2.1x10-5kg/m.s
A)determine removal efficiency for a particle with density 1.5g/cm3 &diameter 10m.
B) determine collection efficiency based on above if a bank of 64 cycloneswith diameters of 24cm are used instead of single large unit?
Solution
a) Determine d50 (for large cyclone)
b=D/4 =0.5m h= D/2=1.0mArea inlet = b x h =0.5m2
vi = Q/A = 14 m/s (take number of turns as ~5turns)
d50 = 12m (use equation 1)
d/ d50 = 10/12 = 0.83 (fr. Fig 9-3, efficiency is about 42%)
a) Determine d50 for small cycloneb = 0.06m, h=0.12m, A inlet= 7.2 x 10-3m2,A for all inlets i.e 64 inlets = 0.45m2
Inlet velocity = Q/A = 15 m/s
d50 = 4m
d/ d50 = 10/4 = 2.5 (fr. Fig 9-3, efficiency is about 88%)
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
14/64
WASTE AND ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT IN
PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY
3. Wet cyclone scrubberMUHD HAFIZ RAMLEY 2008299816
DICKY ZULKAINEY ABD AZIZ 2008403496
FARIS FAISAL CHE RAMELI 2008403584
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
15/64
Introduction
A wet cyclone scrubber is an air pollution controldevice that removes PM from waste gas streams.
Wet cyclone scrubber is particularly useful in the
removal of PM with the following characteristics: Sticky and/or hygroscopic materials
Combustible and corrosive materials
PM which are difficult to remove in their dry form
PM in the presence of soluble gases
PM in waste gas streams with high moisture content
Industrial applications : industrial boilers,incinerators, metals processing, chemicalproduction, and fertilizer production.
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
16/64
How the system works
Gas inletSwirls around the
chamber
Liquid is sprayed
Liquid droplets
Gas outlet
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
17/64
Applicability - Remove dust particles
Efficiency is often directly proportional to the power
input.
Advantage Disadvantage
Small space requirements Corrosion problems
No secondary dust sources High power requirements
Handles high-temperature, high-
humidity gas streams
Water-disposal problems
Minimal fire and explosion hazards Difficult product recovery
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
18/64
4. Electrostatic
Separation TechnologiesWaste and Environmental
Management in Petrochemical
Inductry
Faculty of Chemical Engineering
2012
Prepared by:
Afifah bt Dzulkifli 2008403564
Nor Suraya bt Mohd Kamilan 2008403488
Mohd Asyraf b Pahmi 2008403542
Lecturer: Dr Ahmad Rafizan
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
19/64
Introduction
A dryseparation
technology
Mainly used inindustrial wasteprocessing and
heavy mineralseparationprocessing
Example :
Separate theinsulating
material& theconducting
material
Types of ESP
(common): Role-type ESP
Plate-typeESP
Free-fall ESP
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
20/64
How it works?
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
21/64
Conclusion
Advantages
Small particle
Minimal lost
Easy to operate
High efficiency
Withstandcorrosion
Changes of T&P aresmall
Disadvantages
High cost
Sizing
Limited
Susceptible toexplode
Large amount ofpower
Efficiency
Collection area
Speed
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
22/64
5. Bagh0use / Fabric Filter
Umar usman
Mohd syafiq
Wan izdihar
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
23/64
INtroduction
Air pollution control device
Highly efficient particulate collection
devices
Applications in:
Foundry and steel operations
Pharmaceutical producers
Food manufacturers.
Chemical producers.
Type of Baghouse(cleansing method)
Reverse Air
Pulse Jet
Shaker
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
24/64
How
baghousefilter work?
How to clean the filters?
Intermittent
Continuous OfflineContinuous Online
Clean air
Dust air
Filter bag
SHAKER REVERSE AIR PULSE JET
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
25/64
SHAKER REVERSE AIR PULSE JET
Collection
Efficiency
High High High
Air to cloth ratio Low (1.5-2ft/min) Low (1-2ft/min) High (6-10ft/min)
Temperature
condition
Cant be used in high
temperature
Preferred for high
temperatures
Special fabric needed if
want to use in high
temperature.
Advantages Simple to operate low pressure drop Can clean continuously
Can use strong woven
bags
Have small size and
fewer bags
bag changing without
entering baghouse
Disadvantages large amounts of
space,filter bag
Require frequent
cleaning
Require use of dry
compressed air
many moving parts no effective way toremove residual dust
buildup
Cannot be used if highmoisture content
Personnel must enter
baghouse to replace bags
Personnel must enter
baghouse to replace
bags
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
26/64
Baghouse filter
Example : Fabric filtration system is to be constructedusing bags that are 0.3m in diameter, 6m long. Inlet airflow 10m3/s. Appropriate air velocity determined as2.0 m/min. Determine the number of bags required forcontinuously cleaned operation?
Solution
a. Determine cloth area required,
Afabric
=Q/v = 300m2
b. Area for one bag = DH = 5.65 m2
c. Total number of bags = Afabric
/A = 300/5.65 = 53.05 (54)
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
27/64
6
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
28/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
29/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
30/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
31/64
Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) By Spray Tower
Group members:
Farah Wahidah Azman
Siti Syazana Che Ani
Noor Azzrina Mohd Nawi
Lecturer:
Dr Rafizan
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
32/64
Introduction
Countercurrent in design.
Commonly use in large scale FGD system because:
This system can be either in regenerable or once-through system.
The common scrubbing fluid is lime/limestone slurries.
Spray tower scrubber are often uses on wet FGD system at public &
industrial power generation facilities.
To remove SO2 from the exhaust combustion flue gases of power plant
and other sulfur oxide process emission.
Simplest scrubber
Can reduce plugging &
buildup by pollutants.
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
33/64
Used to remove pollutants
from effluent gas stream
before leaves at the top of
column
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
34/64
CONCLUSION
Advantage
Disadvantage
Application
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
35/64
8. NOx Emission Control(Non-catalytic)
Prepared by:
Mr Sanuzi
Mr Oss
Mr Amin
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
36/64
INTRODUCTION
SELECTIVENON
CATALYTICREDUCTION
To lessennitrogen oxide
By injectingurea or
ammonia tothe firebox.
Urea is easierto handle and
store
Convertnitrogen oxideinto nitrogen
molecules andwater
4 NO + 4 NH3 + O2 -> 4 N2 + 6 H2O
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
37/64
Process Descripction
The operating temperature is 18000F-20000F(9820C-10930C)
The typical process achieved 20-60% NOx reduction.
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
38/64
Conclusions
Advantage
No by products for disposal
Low energy consumptions
No catalyst High capital investment
Less space area than SCR
Disadvantages
Require high T
Optimum response temp
lies in narrow range efficiency is low
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
39/64
9. Absorption:
NOx emissioncontrol (Catalytic)
By
Muhammad Zulkifli Sabtu
Mohd Fadzrel Md Rais
Mohd Yusnihazrien Md Yusof
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
40/64
What is NOx and how it is formed?
Generally, NOx = NO (more) and NO2 (lesser)
Come from 2 mechanism :
-combustion reaction of nitrogen in air with excess oxygen at elevated
temperature (thermal NOx)(25%)
-from the flue gas of boilers fired with high-sulfur coals.
(Fuel NOx)(75%)
The formation
of NOx
depend on 3T
Temp
TurbulenceTime
Why NOx is UNDESIRED?
When NOx and volatile
organic compounds
(VOCs) enter the atmosphere,
they react in the presence of
sunlight to
form ground-level ozone
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
41/64
Controlling
emissions of
nitrogen oxides
from stationary
sources
Reduction of NOxto N2 and H2O by
the reaction of
NOx and ammonia
(NH3) within a
catalyst bed.
Mechanical
Parts
Catalyst used
Shape:
honeycomb
Reactor chamber
with a catalyst bed
Ammonia
handling andinjection
system
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
42/64
O2
NOx
NH3
H2O
N2
REACT TOGETHER
IN CATALYST BED
Reactor chamber with a
catalyst bed
Ammonia handling and
injection system
Conclusion
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
43/64
Conclusion
applicable to all types of boilersincluding stoker, cyclone, wall-firedand tangentially fired boilers
NOx removal = 70%
Present of catalyst cause increment
of costing for raw material sourceand maintenance
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
44/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
45/64
INTRODUCTION
This type of technology is apart of the group of air
pollution controlscollectively referred to as
wet scrubbers.
Venturi jet scrubbers, gas-atomizing spray scrubbers,
and ejector-venturi scrubbers.
Type of Technology:Removal of air pol lutantsby in ert ial and di f fus ion al
intercept ion
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
46/64
Applicable
Pollutants:
Primarily used to control particulatematter (PM), including PM to 10micrometers (m) in aerodynamic
diameter (PM10)
PM to 2.5 m inaerodynamic
diameter (PM2.5).
Though capable of some
incidental control of volatileorganic compounds (VOC),generally venturi scrubbers
are limited to control PM andhigh solubility gases
(EPA, 1992; EPA, 1996).
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
47/64
Venturi scrubber
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
48/64
Advantages Disadvanges
Can handle flammable and explosive
dusts with little risk
Effluent liquid can create water pollution
problems
Can handle mists Waste product collected wet
Relatively low maintenance High potential for corrosion problems
Simple in design and easy to install Protection against freezing required
Collection efficiency can be varied Off gas may require reheating to avoid
visible plume
Provides cooling for hot gases Collected particulate matter may be
contaminated, and may not be recyclable
Corrosive gas and dusts can be neutralize Disposal of waste sludge may be very
expensive
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
49/64
Definition
Sorption term used to describe the surface phenomenon when itis not known/clear whether the process is absorption or adsorptionor combination of the two
Absorption occurs when penetration of one substance (sorbate)into the inner structure of another (sorbent) : refer notes from
lecture on tues (10/4/2012)
Adsorption the sorbate is attracted and held on the surface of thesorbent by chemical bonds (chemisorption)/physical forces i.eLondon-van der waals (physical adsorption)
-adhesion of ions, atoms or molecules from gas, liquid or dissolvedsolids to a surface
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
50/64
Adsorption isotherm
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
51/64
Commonly Reported Adsorption Isotherms
max 1
L
L
K cq q
K c
linq k c
n
fq k c
Linear: Langmuir:
Freundlich:
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
52/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
53/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
54/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
55/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
56/64
IUPAC adsorption isotherm classification
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
57/64
Type I (follows the Langmuir isotherm) is typical of many microporous adsorbents(pore widths below 2 nm); monolayer adsorption.
Types II and III are typical of nonporous materials with strong (type II) or weak(type III) fluid-wall attractive forces.
Types IV and V occur for strong and weak fluid-wall forces, respectively, when thematerial is mesoporous (pore widths from 2 t o 50 nm) and capillary condensationoccurs; these types exhibit hysteresis loops.
Type VI occurs for some materials with relatively strong fluid-wall forces, usuallywhen the temperature is near the melting point for the adsorbed gas. Very rare
Type II ~ IV (II for non-porous, IV large porosity) and III~V (gas molecules havehigher affinity for each other than the solid surface)
p
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
58/64
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
59/64
Adsorption
Character of adsorbent : affinity for specific substances Affinity preferential : alumina, bauxite, silica gel higher affinity towards
water (polar) whereas activated carbon adsorbs non polar compounds(lower hydrocarbons)
Activate carbon most common adsorbent wiht high surface tovolume ratio achieved via activation
Physical activation carbonized at 400-600 oC then activated withsteam at 75-900 C
Chemical activation Impregnated with activating agent zncl2,H3PO4, KOH, and heated to 400-600 oC.
Active carbon properties:
Pore area 500-100 m2/g
Pore volume 0.2-0.8 cm3/g
Pore size classification : micropores (50nm)
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
60/64
Typical commercial properties of GAC
Typical Analysis Specifications
Iodine No 1000 - 1300 mg/g min
CTC (CCL4) Activity 50 - 70% min
Apparent Density 0.40 TO 0.48 g/cc
Ball Pan Hardness 95% to 98% Min
Moisture Content < 15%
ASH Content < 3%
pH Value 9 to 11
Particle Size Distribution
Mesh +4
Mesh -4 +8
Mesh -8
CTC has been banned due to GHG potential. Replaced with methylene blue number.
Iodine test adsorption on surface
Methylene blue diffused into the activated pores
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
61/64
Active carbon production
D i f AC d ti l
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
62/64
Design of AC adsorption column Adsorption capacity obtained from adsorption isotherm experiments .
Normally follows the Freundlich adsorption isotherm behaviour given by
Actual ads. Capacity is 25-50% of theoretical ads. Capacity of the carbon
The breakthrough time is given by:
d
tanconsempiricaln,K
adsorptionaftersolutioninadsorbateofionconcentrat.equilC
carbonofwtunitperadsorbateamountM
X
CKM
X
f
e
n/1
ef
1
1
13
1
,
,
,
,
,/
)2/(
/
mgLionconcentratorganicghbreakthrouC
mgLionconcentratorganicinletC
dmflowrateQ
gcolumnincarbonofmassM
ggcapacityadsorptionghbreakthrouMX
CCQ
MMXt
b
o
c
b
bo
cb
b
Example : Design of activated carbon colums
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
63/64
Example : Design of activated carbon colums
A factory plan to install an activated carbon adsorption system to removenon biodegradable organics and to reduce the COD of the effluent fromthe secondary treatment process prior to discharge to a watercourse.Technical details for the desired system as below:
COD after secondary treatment = 300 mg/L
COD to be acheived after AC column (i.e breakthrough concentration) =100 mg/L
Bulk density of AC = 0.5 g/cm3
Dimension of activated carbon column = 1.0 m diameter (D) X 2.0m height(H)
Effluent flowrate =350 m3/d
From laboratory data :
Adsorption obeys Fruendlich model given as
(X/M) = 0.002Ce1.5
Determine the breakthrough time and surface loading to filter ratio.Evaluate if the adsorption system is adequate for the removal of organics.
S l ti
7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods
64/64
Solution :
columnsmultipleusemthafterexhaustedACadequatedesignComment
hmm
dm
areationalcross
f lowratef iltertoloadingSurface
ddm
gggt
kgHD
kgmvolumedensityACofMass
ggACmgCODmgM
XcapacitylTheoretica
capacityadsorptionatghbreakthrouassumeeiMXMX
CCQ
MMXttimeghBreakthrou
b
o
ob
bi
cbb
.1.:
1879.0
350
sec
3920/100300(350
1015502.2
15504
500
/4.10)300(002.0
%50.)/(5.0)/(
)2/(
)/(,
13
2
13
13
31
23
15.1