Top Banner

of 64

Air Pollution Treatment Methods

Apr 03, 2018

Download

Documents

sagbvn
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    1/64

    C

    P

    E

    68

    1

    1. GRAVITIONALSETTLINGRASHIDI BIN MUHAMAD

    MOHD FAHIMI AB RASHID

    MOHD SAZALI BIN AHMAD

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    2/64

    Simple particulatecollection device

    The principle ofgravity to settlethe particulate

    matter

    In a gas streampassing throughits long chamber

    Gravitational

    Settling

    SpecificationGravitational

    Settling

    To remove large,abrasive particulates

    of size 50 m.

    Usually velocity

    through settling0.5-2.5 m/s.Size less 50 m-largesettling chamber andlong residence time.

    INTRODUCTION

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    3/64

    HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS???

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    4/64

    Advantage Disadvantage Economic Durability Applicability Efficiency

    Low pressure loss Much space

    require

    Low design

    cost

    Durable-no

    moving

    partrequired

    < 50 m not

    practical

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    5/64

    Gravitational Settling

    Settling properties. Stokes Law (for a particle falling in a fluid due togravity, frictional force balance gravity force settling velocity)

    vt = terminal settling velocity, m/s

    g = gravitational constant, m/s2

    p = density of particle, kg/m3

    Pa = density of air, kg/m3

    (approx. 1.2 kg/m3

    )Dp = diameter of particle, m

    = viscosity of air, N.s/m2

    Applies for PM (0.1-100micron) when Re is less than one

    18

    )(2

    pap

    t

    dgv

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    6/64

    Gravitational settling design chamber

    H = height of settling chamber, m

    Vh=horizontal flow-through velocity, v/m

    L =length of settling chamber, m

    *Solving equation 2 for dp will give the largest particlesize that can be removed with 100% efficiency

    18

    )(2

    pap

    ht

    hdg

    L

    Hvv

    L

    Hv

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    7/64

    2.

    CYCLONE

    Suitable for

    coarse particle Most common:

    Reverse flow

    High efficiencydesign

    - High recoveries

    - Small inlet and outlet

    orifices

    High rate design

    - Lower total efficiencies

    - Lower resistance to flow,

    hence higher gas

    capacity

    Fareed-Genevie-Elyzawerni

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    8/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    9/64

    Advantage

    o Low capital cost

    o Ability to operate at high temperatures

    o Low maintenance requirements

    Disadvantage

    o Low efficiencies

    o High operating costs

    o Limited to dry particles

    Efficiency

    o Efficiency is a function of the physical parameters of the application andthe design parameters of the cyclone. Cyclone efficiency increases with:

    a) Coarse particle size distribution

    b) A decrease in cyclone diameter.

    c) Smaller outlet diameter. An increase in pressure drop also results.

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    10/64

    Durability of cyclone

    o Stable pressure drop for a given gas flow

    o Constant efficiency for a given particulate condition

    o No moving parts; no replaceable filterso Ability to handle extremely high dust concentration

    o High temperature capability

    Economic Consideration

    o

    Eliminating the need to replace expensive filters and expose maintenanceworkers while doing so.

    o A simple, short duct system makes for maximum efficiency.

    o Operating costs increase with efficiency.

    Industrial Application

    o Cyclone Dust collector Excellent choice for industrial process areas that have high levels of dust and

    airborne irritants.

    Efficiently clean the air in work areas to capture and remove the dust createdby your process.

    Woodworking, Metalworking, Chemical processing, Paper scrap, Recycling

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    11/64

    Cyclones

    Magnitude of centrifugal force generated

    Fc= centrifugal force, N

    Mp= particulate mass, kg

    Vi = partical velocity ,m/s

    R = radius of cyclone, mTerm v/R = centrifugal acceleration

    * Refer handout for typical cyclone dimensions

    R

    vMF ipc

    2

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    12/64

    Cyclones

    Collection efficiency with respect to particle size. Reference particlesize is taken as the particle that will be removed with 50% efficiencyon a weight basis given by:

    d50= diameter of particle collected with 50% efficiency

    = gas viscosity, kg/m.sb=width of cyclone inlet, m

    Ne=number of effective turns within the cyclone

    Vi=inlet gas velocity, m/s

    p = density of particulate matter, kg/m3

    1.EQvN2

    b9d

    2/1

    pie

    50

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    13/64

    Example: Air stream with flow rate 7m3/s, passed through a cyclone of stdproportions. Diameter of the cyclone is 2.0m and air temperature is 77 oC.Given air viscosity 2.1x10-5kg/m.s

    A)determine removal efficiency for a particle with density 1.5g/cm3 &diameter 10m.

    B) determine collection efficiency based on above if a bank of 64 cycloneswith diameters of 24cm are used instead of single large unit?

    Solution

    a) Determine d50 (for large cyclone)

    b=D/4 =0.5m h= D/2=1.0mArea inlet = b x h =0.5m2

    vi = Q/A = 14 m/s (take number of turns as ~5turns)

    d50 = 12m (use equation 1)

    d/ d50 = 10/12 = 0.83 (fr. Fig 9-3, efficiency is about 42%)

    a) Determine d50 for small cycloneb = 0.06m, h=0.12m, A inlet= 7.2 x 10-3m2,A for all inlets i.e 64 inlets = 0.45m2

    Inlet velocity = Q/A = 15 m/s

    d50 = 4m

    d/ d50 = 10/4 = 2.5 (fr. Fig 9-3, efficiency is about 88%)

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    14/64

    WASTE AND ENVIRONMENTAL

    MANAGEMENT IN

    PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY

    3. Wet cyclone scrubberMUHD HAFIZ RAMLEY 2008299816

    DICKY ZULKAINEY ABD AZIZ 2008403496

    FARIS FAISAL CHE RAMELI 2008403584

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    15/64

    Introduction

    A wet cyclone scrubber is an air pollution controldevice that removes PM from waste gas streams.

    Wet cyclone scrubber is particularly useful in the

    removal of PM with the following characteristics: Sticky and/or hygroscopic materials

    Combustible and corrosive materials

    PM which are difficult to remove in their dry form

    PM in the presence of soluble gases

    PM in waste gas streams with high moisture content

    Industrial applications : industrial boilers,incinerators, metals processing, chemicalproduction, and fertilizer production.

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    16/64

    How the system works

    Gas inletSwirls around the

    chamber

    Liquid is sprayed

    Liquid droplets

    Gas outlet

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    17/64

    Applicability - Remove dust particles

    Efficiency is often directly proportional to the power

    input.

    Advantage Disadvantage

    Small space requirements Corrosion problems

    No secondary dust sources High power requirements

    Handles high-temperature, high-

    humidity gas streams

    Water-disposal problems

    Minimal fire and explosion hazards Difficult product recovery

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    18/64

    4. Electrostatic

    Separation TechnologiesWaste and Environmental

    Management in Petrochemical

    Inductry

    Faculty of Chemical Engineering

    2012

    Prepared by:

    Afifah bt Dzulkifli 2008403564

    Nor Suraya bt Mohd Kamilan 2008403488

    Mohd Asyraf b Pahmi 2008403542

    Lecturer: Dr Ahmad Rafizan

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    19/64

    Introduction

    A dryseparation

    technology

    Mainly used inindustrial wasteprocessing and

    heavy mineralseparationprocessing

    Example :

    Separate theinsulating

    material& theconducting

    material

    Types of ESP

    (common): Role-type ESP

    Plate-typeESP

    Free-fall ESP

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    20/64

    How it works?

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    21/64

    Conclusion

    Advantages

    Small particle

    Minimal lost

    Easy to operate

    High efficiency

    Withstandcorrosion

    Changes of T&P aresmall

    Disadvantages

    High cost

    Sizing

    Limited

    Susceptible toexplode

    Large amount ofpower

    Efficiency

    Collection area

    Speed

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    22/64

    5. Bagh0use / Fabric Filter

    Umar usman

    Mohd syafiq

    Wan izdihar

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    23/64

    INtroduction

    Air pollution control device

    Highly efficient particulate collection

    devices

    Applications in:

    Foundry and steel operations

    Pharmaceutical producers

    Food manufacturers.

    Chemical producers.

    Type of Baghouse(cleansing method)

    Reverse Air

    Pulse Jet

    Shaker

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    24/64

    How

    baghousefilter work?

    How to clean the filters?

    Intermittent

    Continuous OfflineContinuous Online

    Clean air

    Dust air

    Filter bag

    SHAKER REVERSE AIR PULSE JET

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    25/64

    SHAKER REVERSE AIR PULSE JET

    Collection

    Efficiency

    High High High

    Air to cloth ratio Low (1.5-2ft/min) Low (1-2ft/min) High (6-10ft/min)

    Temperature

    condition

    Cant be used in high

    temperature

    Preferred for high

    temperatures

    Special fabric needed if

    want to use in high

    temperature.

    Advantages Simple to operate low pressure drop Can clean continuously

    Can use strong woven

    bags

    Have small size and

    fewer bags

    bag changing without

    entering baghouse

    Disadvantages large amounts of

    space,filter bag

    Require frequent

    cleaning

    Require use of dry

    compressed air

    many moving parts no effective way toremove residual dust

    buildup

    Cannot be used if highmoisture content

    Personnel must enter

    baghouse to replace bags

    Personnel must enter

    baghouse to replace

    bags

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    26/64

    Baghouse filter

    Example : Fabric filtration system is to be constructedusing bags that are 0.3m in diameter, 6m long. Inlet airflow 10m3/s. Appropriate air velocity determined as2.0 m/min. Determine the number of bags required forcontinuously cleaned operation?

    Solution

    a. Determine cloth area required,

    Afabric

    =Q/v = 300m2

    b. Area for one bag = DH = 5.65 m2

    c. Total number of bags = Afabric

    /A = 300/5.65 = 53.05 (54)

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    27/64

    6

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    28/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    29/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    30/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    31/64

    Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) By Spray Tower

    Group members:

    Farah Wahidah Azman

    Siti Syazana Che Ani

    Noor Azzrina Mohd Nawi

    Lecturer:

    Dr Rafizan

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    32/64

    Introduction

    Countercurrent in design.

    Commonly use in large scale FGD system because:

    This system can be either in regenerable or once-through system.

    The common scrubbing fluid is lime/limestone slurries.

    Spray tower scrubber are often uses on wet FGD system at public &

    industrial power generation facilities.

    To remove SO2 from the exhaust combustion flue gases of power plant

    and other sulfur oxide process emission.

    Simplest scrubber

    Can reduce plugging &

    buildup by pollutants.

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    33/64

    Used to remove pollutants

    from effluent gas stream

    before leaves at the top of

    column

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    34/64

    CONCLUSION

    Advantage

    Disadvantage

    Application

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    35/64

    8. NOx Emission Control(Non-catalytic)

    Prepared by:

    Mr Sanuzi

    Mr Oss

    Mr Amin

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    36/64

    INTRODUCTION

    SELECTIVENON

    CATALYTICREDUCTION

    To lessennitrogen oxide

    By injectingurea or

    ammonia tothe firebox.

    Urea is easierto handle and

    store

    Convertnitrogen oxideinto nitrogen

    molecules andwater

    4 NO + 4 NH3 + O2 -> 4 N2 + 6 H2O

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    37/64

    Process Descripction

    The operating temperature is 18000F-20000F(9820C-10930C)

    The typical process achieved 20-60% NOx reduction.

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    38/64

    Conclusions

    Advantage

    No by products for disposal

    Low energy consumptions

    No catalyst High capital investment

    Less space area than SCR

    Disadvantages

    Require high T

    Optimum response temp

    lies in narrow range efficiency is low

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    39/64

    9. Absorption:

    NOx emissioncontrol (Catalytic)

    By

    Muhammad Zulkifli Sabtu

    Mohd Fadzrel Md Rais

    Mohd Yusnihazrien Md Yusof

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    40/64

    What is NOx and how it is formed?

    Generally, NOx = NO (more) and NO2 (lesser)

    Come from 2 mechanism :

    -combustion reaction of nitrogen in air with excess oxygen at elevated

    temperature (thermal NOx)(25%)

    -from the flue gas of boilers fired with high-sulfur coals.

    (Fuel NOx)(75%)

    The formation

    of NOx

    depend on 3T

    Temp

    TurbulenceTime

    Why NOx is UNDESIRED?

    When NOx and volatile

    organic compounds

    (VOCs) enter the atmosphere,

    they react in the presence of

    sunlight to

    form ground-level ozone

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    41/64

    Controlling

    emissions of

    nitrogen oxides

    from stationary

    sources

    Reduction of NOxto N2 and H2O by

    the reaction of

    NOx and ammonia

    (NH3) within a

    catalyst bed.

    Mechanical

    Parts

    Catalyst used

    Shape:

    honeycomb

    Reactor chamber

    with a catalyst bed

    Ammonia

    handling andinjection

    system

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    42/64

    O2

    NOx

    NH3

    H2O

    N2

    REACT TOGETHER

    IN CATALYST BED

    Reactor chamber with a

    catalyst bed

    Ammonia handling and

    injection system

    Conclusion

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    43/64

    Conclusion

    applicable to all types of boilersincluding stoker, cyclone, wall-firedand tangentially fired boilers

    NOx removal = 70%

    Present of catalyst cause increment

    of costing for raw material sourceand maintenance

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    44/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    45/64

    INTRODUCTION

    This type of technology is apart of the group of air

    pollution controlscollectively referred to as

    wet scrubbers.

    Venturi jet scrubbers, gas-atomizing spray scrubbers,

    and ejector-venturi scrubbers.

    Type of Technology:Removal of air pol lutantsby in ert ial and di f fus ion al

    intercept ion

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    46/64

    Applicable

    Pollutants:

    Primarily used to control particulatematter (PM), including PM to 10micrometers (m) in aerodynamic

    diameter (PM10)

    PM to 2.5 m inaerodynamic

    diameter (PM2.5).

    Though capable of some

    incidental control of volatileorganic compounds (VOC),generally venturi scrubbers

    are limited to control PM andhigh solubility gases

    (EPA, 1992; EPA, 1996).

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    47/64

    Venturi scrubber

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    48/64

    Advantages Disadvanges

    Can handle flammable and explosive

    dusts with little risk

    Effluent liquid can create water pollution

    problems

    Can handle mists Waste product collected wet

    Relatively low maintenance High potential for corrosion problems

    Simple in design and easy to install Protection against freezing required

    Collection efficiency can be varied Off gas may require reheating to avoid

    visible plume

    Provides cooling for hot gases Collected particulate matter may be

    contaminated, and may not be recyclable

    Corrosive gas and dusts can be neutralize Disposal of waste sludge may be very

    expensive

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    49/64

    Definition

    Sorption term used to describe the surface phenomenon when itis not known/clear whether the process is absorption or adsorptionor combination of the two

    Absorption occurs when penetration of one substance (sorbate)into the inner structure of another (sorbent) : refer notes from

    lecture on tues (10/4/2012)

    Adsorption the sorbate is attracted and held on the surface of thesorbent by chemical bonds (chemisorption)/physical forces i.eLondon-van der waals (physical adsorption)

    -adhesion of ions, atoms or molecules from gas, liquid or dissolvedsolids to a surface

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    50/64

    Adsorption isotherm

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    51/64

    Commonly Reported Adsorption Isotherms

    max 1

    L

    L

    K cq q

    K c

    linq k c

    n

    fq k c

    Linear: Langmuir:

    Freundlich:

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    52/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    53/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    54/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    55/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    56/64

    IUPAC adsorption isotherm classification

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    57/64

    Type I (follows the Langmuir isotherm) is typical of many microporous adsorbents(pore widths below 2 nm); monolayer adsorption.

    Types II and III are typical of nonporous materials with strong (type II) or weak(type III) fluid-wall attractive forces.

    Types IV and V occur for strong and weak fluid-wall forces, respectively, when thematerial is mesoporous (pore widths from 2 t o 50 nm) and capillary condensationoccurs; these types exhibit hysteresis loops.

    Type VI occurs for some materials with relatively strong fluid-wall forces, usuallywhen the temperature is near the melting point for the adsorbed gas. Very rare

    Type II ~ IV (II for non-porous, IV large porosity) and III~V (gas molecules havehigher affinity for each other than the solid surface)

    p

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    58/64

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    59/64

    Adsorption

    Character of adsorbent : affinity for specific substances Affinity preferential : alumina, bauxite, silica gel higher affinity towards

    water (polar) whereas activated carbon adsorbs non polar compounds(lower hydrocarbons)

    Activate carbon most common adsorbent wiht high surface tovolume ratio achieved via activation

    Physical activation carbonized at 400-600 oC then activated withsteam at 75-900 C

    Chemical activation Impregnated with activating agent zncl2,H3PO4, KOH, and heated to 400-600 oC.

    Active carbon properties:

    Pore area 500-100 m2/g

    Pore volume 0.2-0.8 cm3/g

    Pore size classification : micropores (50nm)

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    60/64

    Typical commercial properties of GAC

    Typical Analysis Specifications

    Iodine No 1000 - 1300 mg/g min

    CTC (CCL4) Activity 50 - 70% min

    Apparent Density 0.40 TO 0.48 g/cc

    Ball Pan Hardness 95% to 98% Min

    Moisture Content < 15%

    ASH Content < 3%

    pH Value 9 to 11

    Particle Size Distribution

    Mesh +4

    Mesh -4 +8

    Mesh -8

    CTC has been banned due to GHG potential. Replaced with methylene blue number.

    Iodine test adsorption on surface

    Methylene blue diffused into the activated pores

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    61/64

    Active carbon production

    D i f AC d ti l

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    62/64

    Design of AC adsorption column Adsorption capacity obtained from adsorption isotherm experiments .

    Normally follows the Freundlich adsorption isotherm behaviour given by

    Actual ads. Capacity is 25-50% of theoretical ads. Capacity of the carbon

    The breakthrough time is given by:

    d

    tanconsempiricaln,K

    adsorptionaftersolutioninadsorbateofionconcentrat.equilC

    carbonofwtunitperadsorbateamountM

    X

    CKM

    X

    f

    e

    n/1

    ef

    1

    1

    13

    1

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,/

    )2/(

    /

    mgLionconcentratorganicghbreakthrouC

    mgLionconcentratorganicinletC

    dmflowrateQ

    gcolumnincarbonofmassM

    ggcapacityadsorptionghbreakthrouMX

    CCQ

    MMXt

    b

    o

    c

    b

    bo

    cb

    b

    Example : Design of activated carbon colums

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    63/64

    Example : Design of activated carbon colums

    A factory plan to install an activated carbon adsorption system to removenon biodegradable organics and to reduce the COD of the effluent fromthe secondary treatment process prior to discharge to a watercourse.Technical details for the desired system as below:

    COD after secondary treatment = 300 mg/L

    COD to be acheived after AC column (i.e breakthrough concentration) =100 mg/L

    Bulk density of AC = 0.5 g/cm3

    Dimension of activated carbon column = 1.0 m diameter (D) X 2.0m height(H)

    Effluent flowrate =350 m3/d

    From laboratory data :

    Adsorption obeys Fruendlich model given as

    (X/M) = 0.002Ce1.5

    Determine the breakthrough time and surface loading to filter ratio.Evaluate if the adsorption system is adequate for the removal of organics.

    S l ti

  • 7/28/2019 Air Pollution Treatment Methods

    64/64

    Solution :

    columnsmultipleusemthafterexhaustedACadequatedesignComment

    hmm

    dm

    areationalcross

    f lowratef iltertoloadingSurface

    ddm

    gggt

    kgHD

    kgmvolumedensityACofMass

    ggACmgCODmgM

    XcapacitylTheoretica

    capacityadsorptionatghbreakthrouassumeeiMXMX

    CCQ

    MMXttimeghBreakthrou

    b

    o

    ob

    bi

    cbb

    .1.:

    1879.0

    350

    sec

    3920/100300(350

    1015502.2

    15504

    500

    /4.10)300(002.0

    %50.)/(5.0)/(

    )2/(

    )/(,

    13

    2

    13

    13

    31

    23

    15.1