Air & Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) AN-SPY-6(V) · PDF fileaegis combat system ... report to congress - ddg 51 flight iii ships air and missile defense radar engineering change proposal,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
ACB – Advanced Capability Build HES-C – High Efficiency Small Capacity MCS – Machinery Control System MFM – Multi-Function Monitor SSGTG – Ship’s Service Gas Turbine Generator
Team • Common Vision – Next Gen Radar • Accountable to the program / product • High Cadence, High Performing • Acting like a small company, but
leveraging the entire company
Focused Discriminants
6
“Two Tools”
“Elegant Design” - simple & clever
All Technical Performance Measures (TPMs) were either met or exceeded
DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for Public Release – Reference [4]
Path Finding & Risk Reduction
Far Field: Operational in 14 Months
Near Field: Operational in 11 months
• Early design proofing of all major array components • Findings incorporated in TD Array • 24 Lot of TRIMMs and Prototype DREX in 7 months • 1st Software Build in 8 months • 1st Patterns in 9 months after contract award • Accelerated program integration by 7 months
TRIMMs Radiator
Overlap Beamformer
Distributed Receiver/Exciter
7 DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for Public Release – Reference [1]
R6s / Cost Reduction
3-Card Design
2-Card Design
• 300VDC TO 1,000VDC Conversion • 2 DFMAs in 22 Months • 2 CCA to 3 CCA Design • 100% Surface Mount Design • Significant Decrease in DPO
Continuous Cost Reduction with Technology Insertion
APG-79
8
TD EMD LRIP FRP
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
LR
IP3
LR
IP4
FR
P1
FR
P2
Contracts
Co
st
Gen 3.0
Gen 4.0
• 3 DFMA cycles • Technology Insertion
Gen 5.0
IDS mature MRL-8 GaN technology enabled AMDR TD Prototype and NGJ POD to meet power, bandwidth and weight requirements
MRL-8 GaN Cost Reduction Proposal Support
Electronic Protection Past performance
SAS Electronic Protection and Multi-Beam Signal Processing expertise and APG-79 Cost reduction methodology drove greater than
9
Raytheon Collaboration AMDR / Next Generation Jammer
Results: Best Value Proposal RAYTHEON
SUB FACTOR FACTOR PROPOSAL
Outstanding
T.1
Outstanding
Outstanding
Outstanding
Good
Good
Good
Outstanding T.2
Outstanding D.1
Good M.1
GoodAcceptable
Acceptable Acceptable
Good E.1
System Design and Integration
H/W Architecture & Development
S/W Architecture & Development
Life Cycle Support Concept
Open Architecture Concept
Technology Maturity
Data Rights
Capabilities, Experiences, & Facilities
Program Management Approach
Past Performance
Energy
10
T.1 = T.2 = D.1 > M.1 >> P.1+ E.1
“Broad Strengths”
P.1
Where we’re going
11
Agile Work Environment
– Collocated
– Collaborative
– Efficient
– Product Focused
– Knowledge Transfer
95% personnel HIL / SIL / Labs All Disciplines No Hierarchy 1 Floor, 40,000 ft2