A KNOWLEDGEMENT The making of any report calls for contribution and cooperation from many others, besides the individual alone. It is the result of meticulous efforts put in the by many minds that contribute to the final report formation. Several eminent people at National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL) have made valuable contributions to this report through their inputs. I duly acknowledge my gratitude to each one of them. At last, I would like to acknowledge all those who helped, directly or indirectly, at various areas in completing my project and related study and made my training a wonderful experience. 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A KNOWLEDGEMENT
The making of any report calls for contribution and cooperation from many others, besides the
individual alone. It is the result of meticulous efforts put in the by many minds that contribute to
the final report formation. Several eminent people at National Aviation Company of India
Limited (NACIL) have made valuable contributions to this report through their inputs. I duly
acknowledge my gratitude to each one of them.
At last, I would like to acknowledge all those who helped, directly or indirectly, at
various areas in completing my project and related study and made my training a wonderful
experience.
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.No Particulars Page No.
1. Executive summary 3
2. Introduction to the topic 4-10
3. Introduction to Airlines Industry and company profile11-18
4. Benefits provided to employees 19-32
5. Productivity Linked Incentives 33
6. Comparison of different Airline companies with AIR INDIA
(NACIL)
34-36
7. IT section in AIR INDIA (NACIL) 37-39
8. Corporate Objectives. 40
9. Research Methodology. 41-43
10. Data Analysis 44-68
11. Findings and Analysis 69
12. Conclusion 70
13. Recommendations 71
14. Limitations 72
15. Bibliography. 73
16. Appendices 74-76
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Project aims to study: the strategies that AIR INDIA (NACIL) is implementing to retain its
employees, and to compare CRM strategies of NACIL with other Airlines Companies.
My study was confined to HR and Commercial Department of AIR INDIA. Under HR
department I was studying all policies that NACIL is implementing to retain its employees and
under Commercial department I studied CRM strategies related to customers. This study has
conducted to know the effectiveness of CRM strategies for internal as well as external customers
of AIR INDIA (NACIL).This study focuses on improvement in existing CRM strategies of the
company. It also aims to study the success of existing policies towards relationship building,
internal marketing, most preferred policy, satisfaction level of employees.
This project has started with study of the organization to have a fair idea about work
culture. I conducted a survey through questionnaire, interview and also got information from
collecting the secondary data available. A structured non-disguised, questionnaire was
formulated in order to gather primary information from the employees. The first approach to find
out the right information about different policies is through verbal talking to employees whether
that person is related to my area of study or not. Then after collecting all the information
employees further gone through to fill up the questionnaire.
In the present time, AIR INDIA (NACIL) is a very good employer as it has just 6%
attrition rate. Most of the employees are satisfied with the organization. But work culture of
NACIL should improve to overcome with so many hurdles that this company is facing now a
days.
3
INTRODUCTION TO THE TOPIC
AIR TRAVEL INDUSTRY:
Aviation Industry in India is one of the fastest growing aviation industries in the world. With the
liberalization of the Indian aviation sector, aviation industry in India has undergone a rapid
transformation. From being primarily a government-owned industry, the Indian aviation industry
is now dominated by privately owned full service airlines and low cost carriers. Private airlines
account for around 75% share of the domestic aviation market. Earlier air travel was a privilege
only a few could afford, but today air travel has become much cheaper and can be afforded by a
large number of people.
The origin of Indian civil aviation industry can be traced back to 1912, when the first air flight
between Karachi and Delhi was started by the Indian State Air Services in collaboration with the
UK based Imperial Airways. It was an extension of London-Karachi flight of the Imperial
Airways. In 1932, JRD Tata founded Tata Airline, the first Indian airline. At the time of
4
independence, nine air transport companies were carrying both air cargo and passengers. These
were Tata Airlines, Indian National Airways, Air service of India, Deccan Airways, Ambica
Airways, Bharat Airways, Orient Airways and Mistry Airways. After partition Orient Airways
shifted to Pakistan.
In early 1948, Government of India established a joint sector company, Air India International
Ltd in collaboration with Air India (earlier Tata Airline) with a capital of Rs 2 crore and a fleet
of three Lockheed constellation aircraft. The inaugural flight of Air India International Ltd took
off on June 8, 1948 on the Mumbai-London air route. The Government nationalized nine airline
companies vide the Air Corporations Act, 1953. Accordingly it established the Indian Airlines
Corporation (IAC) to cater to domestic air travel passengers and Air India International (AI) for
international air travel passengers. The assets of the existing airline companies were transferred
to these two corporations. This Act ensured that IAC and AI had a monopoly over the Indian
skies. A third government-owned airline, Vayudoot, which provided feeder services between
smaller cities, was merged with IAC in 1994. These government-owned airlines dominated
Indian aviation industry till the mid-1990s.
In April 1990, the Government adopted open-sky policy and allowed air taxi- operators to
operate flights from any airport, both on a charter and a non charter basis and to decide their own
flight schedules, cargo and passenger fares. In 1994, the Indian Government, as part of its open
sky policy, ended the monopoly of IA and AI in the air transport services by repealing the Air
Corporations Act of 1953 and replacing it with the Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertaking
and Repeal) Act, 1994. Private operators were allowed to provide air transport services. Foreign
direct investment (FDI) of up to 49 percent equity stake and NRI (Non Resident Indian)
investment of up to 100 percent equity stake were permitted through the automatic FDI route in
the domestic air transport services sector. However, no foreign airline could directly or
indirectly hold equity in a domestic airline company.
By 1995, several private airlines had ventured into the aviation business and accounted for more
than 10 percent of the domestic air traffic. These included Jet Airways Sahara, NEPC Airlines,
East West Airlines, ModiLuft Airlines, Jagsons Airlines, Continental Aviation, and Damania
Airways. But only Jet Airways and Sahara managed to survive the competition. Meanwhile,
Indian Airlines, which had dominated the Indian air travel industry, began to lose market share to
5
Jet Airways and Sahara. Today, Indian aviation industry is dominated by private airlines and
these include low cost carriers such as Deccan Airlines, GoAir, SpiceJet etc, who have made air
travel affordable.
Airline industry in India is plagued with several problems. These include high aviation turbine
fuel (ATF) prices, rising labor costs and shortage of skilled labor, rapid fleet expansion, and
intense price competition among the players. But one of the major challenges facing Indian
aviation industry is infrastructure constraint. Airport infrastructure needs to be upgraded rapidly
if Indian aviation industry has to continue its success story. Some steps have been taken in this
direction. Two of India's largest airports-Mumbai and New Delhi-were privatized recently. Two
Greenfield airports are coming up at Bangalore and Hyderabad in southern India. Investments
are pouring into almost all aspects of the industry, including aircraft maintenance, pilot training
and air cargo services. The future prospects of Indian aviation sector look bright.
6
CRM IN AVIATION
“CRM is a customer-focused business strategy designed to optimize profitability, revenue and
customer satisfaction."
Why should Airlines do CRM?
Anything else ?
50 60% of customers are not profitable and customers providing less than 20% of the profit
potential consume 60 80% of front office support
The cost of acquiring a new customer is 6 times the cost of selling to a current customer
7
69% of customers leave because of poor service. Only 13% left because of product dissatisfaction
and 9% because of price.
The Aviation horizon in India is becoming increasingly competitive. Airlines need to stay more
customers focused and employ effective CRM regardless of whether they are PSUs, full-service
providers, Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs) or innovators.
Need for a Customer-focused Initiative
(i) Travel is becoming a ‘Commodity’
Increased economic activity has meant that more and more people are travelling for
business as well as leisure purposes. The situation today is such that travel, overseas
as well as domestic, has become so common and prevalent that it can be easily termed
a ‘commodity’.
(ii) Mass Marketing is ‘Dead’
The vast number of options and choices available to a Customer and the explosion of
information have meant that every customer is having individualized needs which are
unique and cannot be generalized. Today, every customer expects the Marketer to
cater to his / her own needs. Hence, the era of Mass Marketing is almost dead. The
need of hour is one-to-one marketing wherein every customer is taken care of for his /
her special needs.
(iii) Mass Marketing is the ‘Easy Bit’
The comforts which Marketers have enjoyed in the earlier times were mainly because
of the generalizations which were made while addressing customer needs. One
advertising message or campaign was thought to be sufficient for reaching the
masses, making it easier for the Marketers.
(iv) Its about ‘Revenue’ and ‘Competitive Edge’
The increasing demands of customers and the stakeholders has meant that costs as
well as prices have to be contained on one hand and on the other the revenues need to
be increased for gaining a sustainable competitive advantage over the competitors.
8
360 Degree Customer view: Source – Magazine
9
ABOUT “SIMPLIFYING THE BUSINESS” (StB)
In this rapidly changing world the biggest challenge an Industry face is to keep pace with the
increasing customer’s demands for services and at the same time achieving the targets of cost
reductions which are so much essential for revenue maximization.
The Aviation Industry has been both the driver as also the sector, which has been affected most
by the sweeping waves of globalization. Today, more than ever before, the passenger traffic is
touching new highs as business / leisure travel is rapidly increasing.
To face the challenges, more than anything else, the Air Transport Industry needs change.
Mounting losses, high oil prices and lower fares have forced Airlines to rethink current models
and re-engineer the business. Efficiency is the battle cry as air transport races to become a low
cost Industry. The challenge to find cost savings in the Industries complex process, whilst, at the
same time, enhancing convenience for the consumer.
As a result, in 2004 the CEOs of IATA’s member Airlines mandated its association to lead in
Industry wise programmes designed to ease the transport of passenger and freight and deliver $
6.5 billion in annual Industry savings.
It’s called “SIMPLIFYING THE BUSINESS”
‘Simplifying the Business’ is comprises of five projects that together form an end-
to-end simplified travel process : -
1. 100% Electronic Ticketing by the end of 2007 (ET)
2. Common use self-service kiosks for check-in (CUSS)
3. Bar-coded boarding passes (BCBP)
4. Radio frequency identification for baggage handling (RFID)
5. IATA e-freight – freeing cargo of paper by the end of 2010
10
Out of the five I.T. initiative taken by IATA, Electronic Ticketing (ET) is the most critical it of
huge importance to passengers, will deliver US $ 3 billion in savings, and has a fast approaching
deadline. The ease of issuing tickets changing travel plans, making last minute travel decisions
and the elimination of lost tickets are compelling consumer benefits. E-Ticketing is the basis of
other passenger services such as common use self-service check in and the ability to print bar
coded boarding passes via the internet.
11
INTRODUCTION TO AIRLINES INDUSTRY
AND COMPANY PROFILE
During the 1980s and 1990s, the airline industry underwent significant change. The industry,
which had been heavily regulated and controlled, was liberated fro m governmental oversight
and released to the vagaries of the marketplace in 1978. What followed was a period of evolution
and metamorphosis that changed the nature of flying forever. At the same time, serious safety
questions arose.
DEREGULATION:
When the firsts airlines appeared after World War I, fewer than six thousand passengers a year
traveled by air. By the 1930s, the Big four- Eastern Airlines, United Airlines, American Airlines,
and Trans World Airlines (TWA) - dominated commercial air transport. These companies had
garnered exclusives rights from the federal government to fly domestic airmail routes, and Pan
American (Pan AM) held the rights to international routes. The hold of these four airlines on
their lucrative contracts was virtually unchallenged until deregulation in 1978. Even after the
formation of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) in 1938, formed to license new airlines, grant
new routes, approve mergers, and investigate accidents, the Big Four and Pan Am continued to
be guaranteed permanent rights to these routes. Infact, no new major scheduled airline was
licensed for the next four decades.
In October 1978, Congress passed the Airline Deregulation Act (49 U.S.C.A. § 334 et seq.),
ending the virtual monopoly held by the Big four and Pan Am. The government’s goal was to
promote competition within the industry. The act gave airlines essentially unrestricted rights to
enter new routes without CAB approval. The companies could also exit any market and raise and
lower fares at will.
The immediate effect of deregulation was a drop in fares an and increase in passengers. New cut-
rate, no-frills airlines, such as People Express Airlines and New York Air offered travelers the
12
lowest fares ever seen in the industry. Forced to compete to fill their planes, the larger companies
lowered their prices as well. Then the oil-producing countries in the Middle East formed a cartel
and raised the price of jet fuel 88% in 1979 and an additional 23% in 1980. Combined with
tumbling fares and increased passenger loads, the higher cost of jet fuel caused airlines’ profits to
drop.
Labor strike also affected the industry in the early days following deregulation. In 1981, after
years of working under stressful conditions made worse by deregulation, the professional Air
traffic controllers Organization (PATCO) called a strike, demanding shorter working hours and
higher pay. The union expected support and cooperation from the Reagan administration because
of a sympathetic letter President Ronald Reagan had sent to PATCO when he was campaigning
for the presidency. In the letter, he pledged to whatever was necessary to meet PATCO’s needs
and ensure the public’s safety. But Reagan ordered the strikers to return to work within three
days or be fired. Most did not return. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ordered all
carriers to temporarily reduce their number of flights by one-third. Newer and smaller carriers
found themselves increasingly unable to gain access to lucrative routes. Rebuilding the air traffic
controller force took years during which landing slots at 5he largest airports remained restricted
and small carriers unable to compete, simply abandoned their attempts to break into the larger
markets.
To some extent, competitive pricing actually had the opposite effect of what the deregulators
intended. When the small “upstart” companies offered extremely low fares, the larger companies
responded aggressively. For example, in 1983, People Express announced $99 round –trip fare
between Newark, New Jersey and Minneapolis-St. Paul. Northwest Airlines, which had always
dominated the Twin Cities market, undercut People by instituting a$95 fare for the same
destination and scheduling extra departures around People’s. As a result, people decided it could
not compete and withdrew from the market. Passengers enjoyed the benefit of lower fares, but
only for a short time before the competitive effect faded and high fares returned.
When deregulation brought competitive pricing, the large carriers began to realize that it was not
profitable for them to do business the way they had in the past. The first major change they made
was to abandon the practice of crisscrossing the continent with nonstop flights to many different
cities. Instead the major airlines scheduled most of their flights into and out of a central point of
hub, where passengers might need to change to different flight to complete their journey. One
airline controlled most of the reservation desks and gates at a particular hub- for instance. United
13
in Chicago, Northwest in Minneapolis-St.Paul, America in Dallas–Fort worth, and Delta in
Atlanta. For this reason, and because passengers tend trod is like changing carriers in the middle
of a trip ,the dominant company in a hub had a tremendous advantage over the competition in
influencing what carrier a passenger would choose .By 1990, two-thirds of all domestic
passengers traveled though a hub city before arriving at their final destination .of those
passengers, eight out of ten remained on the same airline throughout their journey .By 1992 ,
there were at least twelve “fortress hubs” or airports where one airline controlled more than 60
percent of the traffic .Passengers who flew out of these hubs paid over 20 percent more than they
would have for a comparable trip out of an airport that was not a hub.
After deregulation, the air lines also came to realize that needed a more efficient way to book
reservation and issue tickets. It is difficult to imagine, in these days of highly sophisticated
computers and split-second communications, that until the late 1970s and early 1980s airline
schedules were contained in large printed volumes, reservations were taken over the telephone
and tailed manually at end of each day , and tickets were written by hand . to streamline this
process the large companies initially proposed a joint computer system , listings schedules and
fares .the justice department objected on the grounds that such a system would be
anticompetitive and would violate the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. [1890]).
Instead, each airline developed its own computer system and entered data in a manner that
unfairly biased travel agents ‘choices in favor of the carrier that owned the system. Though
skillful manipulation of the data, the airlines were able to put competitors at a disadvantage. For
example, the airline that owned the system might enter the data so that all its flights to a
particular destination appear on the screen before any flights of a competitor.
In a future attempt to win loyalty from passengers, the large airlines instituted frequent-flier
programs, which awarded free tickets to travelers after they logged a certain number of miles
flown with the company.
The combination of hubs, central computer reservation systems, and frequent-flier programs
made the major airlines almost invulnerable in large markets.
Deregulation also brought a period of financial upheaval and an epidemic of “merger fever”. A
number of companies ceased doing business between 1989 and 1992, and still other merged with
stronger, more aggressive companies. Among the companies that disappeared from the skies
were Eastern. Pan Piedmont and Midway Airlines. USAir and Northwest required cash
infusions though cooperative arrangements with foreign airlines. Even financially strong carriers
14
such as United and American lay off employees and abandoned plans to p0urchase new aircraft,
which added to the woes of the depressed aerospace industry.
By 1993, the industry began to rebound. Continental Airlines and TWA emerged from
bankruptcy, and a few small carriers, such as Kiwi International, formed by former Eastern
Pilots, responded to the public’s demand for low fares and began to make incursions into the
established markets, although they generally shied away from directly challenging the giants.
Older carriers for the most part chose to stay with their hub-and-spoke systems, and several,
including Northwest, Continental, and TWA, gains concessions from their unions that helped
them emerge from apparently imminent financial ruin.
The mergers and buyouts of the 1980s were often accomplished in an atmosphere of hostility and
distrust. Charges of predatory pricing and other unfair business practices were leveled by one
carrier against another. During the 1980s, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division made a
number of grand jury investigations into alleged anticompetitive activity by the major airlines,
but no indictments were handed down. However, the companies that survived did not emerge
unscathed. Many of the acquisitions were leveraged buyouts that left the reconstituted companies
heavily in debt. With profits insufficient to cover their enormous debt loads, the companies
frantically competed for business, engaging in fare wars that produced a dizzying array of
pricing plans with equally numerous and confusing restrictions. Some of the tactics were
questionable, but, again, not clearly illegal. In 1993, American Airlines was sued by Continental
and Northwest for alleged predatory pricing during a 1992 fare war. The jury took just over two
hours to return a verdict in favor of American.
By 1993, a creative new solution to the airlines’ financial woes began to emerge. Northwest
avoided bankruptcy when its unions agreed to wage concessions in return for part ownership of
the airline. Then, in1994 after seven years of negotiating, employees of United gained majority
control of their company in return for deep pay and benefits cuts. Secretary of Labor Robert B.
Reich commented that other financially troubled companies would undoubtedly follow suit:
“From here on in, it will be impossible for a board of directors to not consider employee
ownership as one potential business strategy”. However, dome industry analysts doubted that
employee ownership would be effective in the long run because of inherent conflicts between
labor and management, or between different labor groups. “It can’t work,” declared former
Chrysler chairman Lee A. Iacocca. “What do you think will happen when n it’s a choice between
employee benefits and capital investment?”
15
Proponents of deregulation are confident that the changes accompanying it will result in a
stronger, more stable, and efficient industry, better reequipped than ever to serve the needs of the
flying public. Others maintain that at least some degree of regulation is needed to guarantee
safety and fair competitive practices.
SAFETY:
In troubling criticism of deregulation is that aggressive competition has forced airlines to cut
corners, resulting in safety lapses. In 1990, Eastern Airlines was handed a sixty-count federal
indictment charging it with shoddy and dishonest maintenance practices. The indictments came
after years of complaints by mechanics for the financially troubled airline who claimed that
pressures to cut costs led to maintenance shortcuts and falsification of maintenance records. In
January 1991, Eastern ceased operation.
Critics contend that Eastern was hardly alone in its cavalier approach to safety. They charge that
the FAA is understaffed and poorly managed and that money shortages have caused all the
airlines to relax safety standards. They point not only to increased pressured on the labor force
but also to companies’ reluctance to replace their aging fleets, the congestion of airspace caused
by increased air travel, crowded hub airports that create security risks ,and overworked and
sometimes poorly trained air traffic controllers. Yet, statistically, passengers are no more likely
to die in a plane crash since deregulation than they were before it. Still, critics maintain that,
despite the airlines’ and government’s efforts to assure the traveling public to the contrary, air
safety is in need of substantial improvements.
Many critics feel that at least part of the problem lies in the dual role of the FAA. Charged
simultaneously with promoting the economic health of the aviation industry and fostering safety,
the agency is often at odds with itself. In addition, the FAA’s budget was cut and the number of
inspectors reduced in the 1980’s, the same period which the number of passengers multiplied and
the number of air traffic controllers was reduced. Furthermore, unions, which stand to benefit
from the increased scrutiny and higher standards imposed by the FAA continue to be major
instigators foe a change. However, even neutral commentators have suggested that it is time to
impose some degree pf regulation in the form of stronger FAA oversight, on the industry. In fact,
the FAA has been accused of suffering from a “tombstone mentality” that caused the agency to
delay acting on safety concerns until negative publicity generated by a crash forces the issue.
Even after safety measures are recommended by the National Transportation Safety Board
16
(NTSB), the agency charged with investigating accidents, the FA has been criticized for not
always following through.
Aging aircraft became a major concern during the late 1980s and early l1990s. In 1988, an Aloha
Airgroup Boeing 737-200, purchased in 1969, lost the top of its fuselage while flying at twenty-
four thousand feet. A flight attendant was immediately sucked out of the plane and plunged to
her death. The plane made a harrowing emergency landing, but not before sixty-five passengers
suffered injuries, some serious. Congress responded in 1991 by passing the Aging Aircraft
Safety Act (49 App.>S>C>A 1421 note), which requires airlines to demonstrate that their older
planes are airworthy. Critics claim that enforcement of the law has been lax and that it ignores
other compelling reasons to replace aging aircraft, such as the availability of newer fire –
retardant seat and of updated seats designed to be more resistant to the impact of a crash.
Concerns over airline safety became even more acute in the early 1990s with a series of fatal
crashes. The Boeing Company, a major producer of aircraft predicts that the number of jet
crashes worldwide could double by the year 2010 if accident rates of the early1990s continue.
Such a projection strikes fear into the hearts of the flying public. However, according to David
R. Hinson, the federal aviation administrator, flight safety is not a simplistic science that lends
itself to easy solutions.” Flight safety experts point out that all and flight attendants, most airlines
now prohibit smoking on all domestic flights and on many international flights as well. Air
quality was again questioned in 1993 when it was revealed that, as a cost saving measure, many
airlines were circulating fresh air into their aircraft less frequently than they had in the past. This
led to complaints by passengers and crew of headaches, nausea, and the transmission of
respiratory illnesses. Although the FAA conceded that circulating more fresh air would be
beneficial, it backed off from requiring airlines to do so because of the cost involved.
The Safety of babies and toddlers on airplanes was investigated after it was shown that a number
of them suffered injuries, some serious or fatal, during incidents that did not injure their parents.
Unlike adults and their luggage, children under age two are not required to be secured on an
airplane but rather may be held on an adult’s lap. These “lap babies” are often ripped from the
adult’s grasp during turbulence or crashes. In 1994, Representatives Jolene unsoeld, D-wash.,
and Jim Ross Lightfoot, R-Iowa, introduced a bill that would have required the use of child
safety restraints on commercial flights .however, the measure, which was supported by the
Association of flight attendants. NTSB, Air Transport Association, Aviation Consumer Action
Project, and Air Line Pilots Association, was opposed by the FAA and eventually defeated. An
17
FAA spokesperson, testify in opposition to the bill, said the FAA’s research indicated that if all
children who needed them were placed in child safety seats, the airlines would save
approximately one life over a ten –year period, and the children’s families would save about $2.5
billion. A study conducted at Harvard Medical School estimated that one infant a year could be
saved through the use of safety seats. The sponsors of the bill vowed to continue to press for
more stringent safety standards for babies.
Safety concerns will continue to plague the airline industry, even though the FAA assures the
flying public that, statistically, at least, flying a major airline in the United States is far safer than
driving on an interstate highway. Questions persist about the FAA’s effectiveness in overseeing
air safety. And financially strapped airlines, which posted $12.8 billion in losses from 1990 to
1994, must make difficult risk-benefit analyses when contemplating new safety measures.
Some critics such as Ralph Nader, who initially supported deregulation, are now calling for
limited government intervention to ensure safety. However, experts warn that the U.S airlines
system. Which is already extremely safe, probably can never be completely without risk.
According to Stuart Matthews , president of the flight Safety Foundation,” if the public
absolutely demands that flying be totally safe, you are going to have to ban flying.” Given the
taking a calculated risk and not flying at all, Americans, who take their lives into their hands
each time they drive, will probably continue to trust the statistics and take their chances. What
form the industry will assume when the deregulation dust finally settles remains an open
question.
ABOUT INDIAN AIRLINES:
HISTORY:
Indian Airlines was constituted as a corporation under Air Corporation Act, August 1953.It is
wholly owned corporation of the government of India and is a product of nationalization of the
existing private airlines operating scheduled air services within India and between India and
18
Burma, Nepal, Ceylon, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Airlines, which merged and integrated to
form Indian Airlines, were:
Airways (India) Limited.
Air India (operating domestic service only)
Air services of India Limited
Deccan Airways Limited
Himalayan Airways Limited
Bharat Airways Limited
Indian National Airways
Kalinga Airways Limited
Before 1953, i.e., before these Airlines merged to form Indian Airlines, there were no set rules and
standards of operations of the Airlines. The operations mainly were competition oriented and the
result of which was that every Airlines wanted to be the cheapest one. Thus resulted in almost all
the Airlines did not have enough money to maintain the Aircrafts. They were presented an
excellent example of unhealthy competition. Ultimately the Govt. took over by passing the Air
Corporation Act and Indian Airlines come into being. The affairs of the corporation are conducted
by a board of Directors.
Indian Airlines is one of the public sectors corporations in India. A statutory corporation like
Indian Airlines is formed with definite objectives in th interest of the public through based on pre-
set principles.
OBJECTVE FUNCTIONS OF INDIAN AIRLINES:
It shall be the function of the corporation to provide safe, efficient, and adequate, economical and
properly co-ordinate air transport services whether domestic or international or both.
19
Corporation shall so exercise their power as to secure that air transport service are developed to the
best advantage and in particular, so exercise their power as to secure that the services are provided
at reasonable charges. The Act provides for the constitution of a Board of directors, which may
exercise all such power and do all such acts and things as may be exercised or done by the
corporation under this act. The Board of Directors shall consist of a chairman cum Managing
Director to be appointed by the Central government and not less than eight and not more than
fourteen other Directors to be appointed by the Central government.
Indian Airlines is a public utility service under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has to work in the
interests of the public. In view of this, the corporation is accountable to the public through the
Govt. and parliament for its activities. This control is two fold:
To see that corporation does not deviate from its objectives.
To have financial control because the funds of the corporation are derived from public
funds.
The credit of launching the first real effective internal air services in India goes to Tata sons who
from 15 October 1932 began operating air mail services between Karachi and madras once a week
with a single engine aircraft. Indian National airways established in December 1934 an air service
between Karachi and Lahore linking with imperial airways service at Karachi. In 1934 Tata sons
doubled its weekly frequency on the Karachi-madras route and a weekly service between Bombay
and Trivandrum with a halt at Goa and Cannannore in Kerela. In 1937 a bi weekly service was
operated between Bombay and Delhi via Indore, Bhopal, and Gwallior. India national airways
launched their venture by establishing an air link from Calcutta to Dhaka and Rangoon. A third
company, air services of India came into existence in 1937-38.
20
In 1960, the logo for Indian airlines was selected which was based on golden section of ancient
Greeks. “A” had been italicized to suggest speed and the truncation of first stroke indicates
movement while the second emphasized on reliability.
The forward surging of the symbol was intended to show the “looking ahead” characteristic and
the orange colour gave vibrancy and purity.
The Logo has now been changed and the “Wheel of konark” which is replica of the sun now
symbolizes Indian Airlines.
Amalgamation of Air India Limited and Indian Airlines Limited with National Aviation
Company of India Limited:
The Government of India, on 1 March 2007, approved the merger of Air India and Indian
Airlines. Consequent to the above, a new Company viz National Aviation Company of India
Limited (NACIL) was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 on 30 March 2007 with its
Registered Office at Airlines House, 113 Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi.
It has been decided that post merger, the new entity will be known as “Air India” while
“Maharaja” will be retained as its mascot. The logo of the new airline will be a red coloured
flying swan with the “Konark Chakra” in orange placed inside it. The flying swan has been
morphed from Air India’s characteristic logo “The Centaur” whereas the “Konark Chakra” was
reminiscent of Indian’s logo. The Corporate Office of NACIL will be at Mumbai
This new AIR INDIA is………
21
……here in international and domestic market with this new image and logo.
22
BENEFITS TO EMPLOYEES
National Aviation of India Limited provides benefits to its employees under two categories:
I) STATUARY BENEFITS:
a) Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 :
In case of a temporary or permanent injury, caused to an
employee while in service, the organization has to provide the compensation to the employee.
b) Provident Fund Act, 1925 :
This benefit is given to the employee after retirement from the
organization.
c) Wages Act,1936 :
Earlier wages were not paid on time. According to this act, the wages and
salaries will be paid on fixed time and all the deductions dine would be told to the employees.
d) Industrial dispute Act,1947 :
According to this act, a committee known as works
committee is formed which deals with the welfare of the employees at the grass root level. The
members of this committee are 50% from the employer’s side and 50% from the employee’s
side.
e) Employees State Insurance Act, 1948:
23
According to this act, if the employee or his family
members are sick then the company looks after their health i.e., most of the money is given by
NACIL.
f) Factory Act, 1948:
This act takes care of the service conditions, work environment etc. given to
the employees. It also keeps a check on the working hours and action is taken whenever the
regulations are violated.
g) Air Corporation Act, 1953:
A new enactment was made in 1953 where there was a provision for
problems regarding labor relations. Here 50% participants are employer’s side and 50% from
employee’s side.
h) Provident Fund Miscellaneous Act, 1953:
In the previous provident fund act, there was no
provision for drawing money before retirement. According to modified act, if the money is
refundable, six times of the provident fund salary can be withdrawn which can be recovered in 3
years in 36 installments.
i) Payment of Gratuity Act,1972 :
NACIL can pay a maximum of 3.5 lakhs as gratuity. This is
statutory and deviation is possible.
II) NON STATUTORY BENEFITS:
24
a) Scholarships :
These are provided to the wards of the employees. It basically starts from class
II till the post graduation level e.g. MBA, Engineering etc. The amount of scholarship given to
the employees for their children is on yearly basis which is shown in the table below:
Particulars Amount (in RS.)
Class II - Class IV 125
Class V – Class VIII 250
Class IX – Class XII 375
For Graduates 500
For Diploma Holders 625
For Engineering/MBA etc. 750
b) Air passage :
This Non-Statutory welfare facility is entitled for free and discounted passage to
travel. It is given to three types of staff:
1. For Permanent staff:
It starts after the completion of 1 year. Air passage for the permanent
staff is shown in the table below:
Years for service Free Air Tickets Discount (95%) Discount (85%)
1 – 5 2 - 3
5 – 7 2 1 2
7 – 10 2 2 1
10 – 20 2 3 -
20 – 25 2 4 -
25
25 & Above 2 5 -
2. For Retired staff:
Retired employees with minimum 15 years of service are eligible for this
Air passage benefit. This non statuary benefit is shown in the table below:
Years for service Free Air tickets Discount (95%)
15 – 20 1 2
20 -25 1 3
25 & above 2 4
Retired Employees are also given this benefit:
Passage for SOL (Staff On Leave)
This passage is for the employees and his family.
Passage for SOD (Staff On Duty)
SOD is granted additional passage for the purpose of any official
work.
3. For Decease Employees :
26
If any employee dies while service then, he will get Air Passage benefits half of
what he was actually getting while working.
If any employee dies after retirement then, he will get Air passage benefits half of
what he was actually getting after retirement.
For deceases employees, Air Passage benefits will be given only to employee’s spouse