Top Banner
Kenneth McNamee, MSc, CMVP Airport Facility Optimization / Energy Best Management Practices
24

Air 2015 aaae

Aug 11, 2015

Download

Design

Stantec
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Air 2015 aaae

Kenneth McNamee, MSc, CMVP

Airport Facility Optimization / Energy Best Management Practices

Page 2: Air 2015 aaae

What isEfficient Operation?

Page 3: Air 2015 aaae

Define the Standard

(IABI) >20 Terminals (separated from wider airport ops.)

4 Countries (US, Canada, Netherlands, Turkey)

Various Size (200k – 50million EPAX)

Page 4: Air 2015 aaae

Performance

74 ekWh/ft2

Range

28 ekWh/ft2

Average Energy Intensity

Large Airport 47 ekWh/ft2 13.6 ekWh/EPAX

Medium Airport 46 ekWh/ft2 12.5 ekWh/EPAX

Small Airport 45 ekWh/m2 16.4 ekWh/EPAX

Page 5: Air 2015 aaae

Lighting

Concessions

Passenger / Baggage

Movement

HVAC

Pre-conditioned Air

Airports are inherently high consumers of energy:

Page 6: Air 2015 aaae

Steps to Optimizing Performance

• Define Baseline Performance (Benchmark)

• ASHRAE Level 1, 2 or 3 Energy Assessments

• System Retro-commissioning

Page 7: Air 2015 aaae

ASHRAE Energy Assessments

Page 8: Air 2015 aaae

Level 1• Walk-Through Audit (Least cost

intensive option)

• Energy Baseline, Systems Description, Measure identification

• Helps Narrow the Focus

Page 9: Air 2015 aaae

Level 2• Detailed Audit

• In depth analysis of building performance, including envelope, HVAC and lighting systems

• Avoided energy costs through implementation of ECMs

Page 10: Air 2015 aaae

Level 3• Investment grade audit (Most cost

intensive option)

• Typically utilizes a energy model to more accurately determine synergistic effects of energy conservation measures

• Provides greater accuracy when deciding on ECM measures

Page 11: Air 2015 aaae

System Retrocommissioning

Page 12: Air 2015 aaae

Planning• Identify buildings to be included

in study – Define the scope

• Baseline energy performance (typically 9 months)

• Identify HVAC points to be trended and begin recording data

Page 13: Air 2015 aaae

Investigation• Visit site, assess building operation

and profile energy consuming equipment

• Analyze system trend data and identify opportunities for optimization

• Calculate potential avoided costs & prioritize implementation measures

Page 14: Air 2015 aaae

Implementation• Implement energy

Retrocommissioning measures

• Record implementation strategies and update O&M manuals

Page 15: Air 2015 aaae

Hand-off• Measure savings from baseline

period

• Identify whether implemented measures reflect investigation recommendations

• Identify opportunities to maintain savings moving forward

Page 16: Air 2015 aaae

Which option is right for you?Energy Audit

orRetrocommissioning

Page 17: Air 2015 aaae

A European Perspective

Page 18: Air 2015 aaae

CASCADE Research Project• Funded by the EU

• Lead Research Group - Fraunhofer

• Utilizing Building technology to identify system inefficiencies at Airports

• Targeted 20% reductions in energy and GHG emissions

• 3 year payback period

• Goal is to role this program out over all European Airports

Page 19: Air 2015 aaae

The Process• Benchmark 60 EU airports for energy

• Select two candidates for participation

• Building Systems Retrocommissioned

• Energy upgrade projects implemented

• Building performance “Normalized”

• Implement FDD and ISO50001 process at these airports

Page 20: Air 2015 aaae
Page 21: Air 2015 aaae

Could a similar coordinated approach make sense for North American Airports?

Page 22: Air 2015 aaae

The Potential Benefits• Airports have unique operational

requirements

• Ability to share data will only enhance energy savings potential

• Best practices can be established

• Could result in a more coherent and targeted approach to EM at airports

Page 23: Air 2015 aaae

Regulatory Support

RegulatoryBody

Page 24: Air 2015 aaae