AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006 1 Is Privacy RFID’s Achilles Heel? There is growing evidence that RFID opponents are winning the war against radio frequency identification
Dec 16, 2015
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
1
Is Privacy RFID’s Achilles Heel?There is growing evidence that RFID opponents are
winning the war against radio frequency identification
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
3
PRESENTATION SUMMARY
• The item-level opportunity• Losing the battle for hearts and minds• The industry’s response• Capitulation!• Factors contributing to RFID’s problems• Why we can’t be complacent• What we can do to address the problem
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
4
THE ITEM-LEVEL OPPORTUNITY
Item-level tagging represents the biggest opportunity for vendors• Global retail sales in 2005: $8.7 trillion• Assume an average price per item of $10• 870 billion item tags• Readers covering miles of shelving, in-store displays, racks and so on
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
5
THE ITEM-LEVEL OPPORTUNITY
Item-level tagging represents the biggest opportunity for end users• Only item-level tagging will reduce:
• Out-of-stocks• Shrinkage• Counterfeiting• Unsaleable goods that have passed their
expiration date
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
6
LOSING THE BATTLE
But the opportunity is slipping away . . .
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
7
LOSING THE BATTLE
Consider these facts:
• Google returns 227,000 references to “spychips” — up from 165,000 in August
• Spychips.com ranked 5th by Google when searching for RFID
• Electronic Privacy Information Center’s RFID page ranks 10th
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
8
LOSING THE BATTLE
Media coverage is overwhelmingly negative
• "Oh, for the good old days when Big Brother merely watched you. Soon, he'll be coming home with you in what you buy, wear, drive and read.” —Consumer Reports, June 2006
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
9
LOSING THE BATTLE
Media coverage is overwhelmingly negative
• “At item-level tagging, you have actual linkage [to a consumer’s credit card information], since details of your purchase are archived along with your credit-card information and other particulars of your private life. Your details are even matched with those on file for your family and associates.” —Globe and Mail, July 2006
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
10
LOSING THE BATTLE
Wired Magazine Calls Katherine Albrecht, founder of CASPIAN, RFID’s Erin Brockovich
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
11
LOSING THE BATTLE
Consumers are listening• Spychips: How Major Corporations and
Government Plan to Track Your Every Purchase and Watch Your Every Move
•#1 on Amazon’s Movers & Shakers list
•#6 on Amazon’s Non-Fiction Bestseller list
•#15 on Amazon’s Daily Sales list
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
12
INDUSTRY RESPONSE
• Created privacy guidelines
• Mandated a kill command
• Established a Public Policy Steering Committee
• Created a label required on tagged products
• Lent support to those opposing RFID bills
EPCglobal has:
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
13
INDUSTRY RESPONSE
• Created a label for tagged products
• Begun developing best practices
• Produced an educational video
• Published a position paper
• Done media tours to educate journalists
AIM Global has:
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
14
INDUSTRY RESPONSE
• Created best practices
• Lobbied against RFID bills
• Spoken positively about RFID in the media
• Supported AIM and EPCglobal initiatives
Other companies/groups have:
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
15
INDUSTRY RESPONSE
• Retailers are afraid to discuss item-level trials going on
• RFID Journal could not get a single U.S. apparel company to speak at our recent Apparel & Footwear RFID Summit
• Companies are backing away from RFID
Item-level RFID is taboo
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
16
INDUSTRY RESPONSE
These efforts are
FAILING!
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
17
CAPITULATION!
American Eagle Outfitters:• “American Eagle currently does not use any
RFID systems, either in supply chain management, consumer credit card or loyalty programs, or anywhere else within our operations. We highly value and respect our customers’ privacy. The fact that a vendor may have offered a system demonstration should not be interpreted as an intention on our part to adopt such a system in future.”
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
18
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
How could this be?
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
19
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
End users shoot themselves in the foot• April 2003: Benetton is forced to issue a
press release backtracking on RFID plans after CASPIAN calls for a boycott
• Nov. 2003: Chicago Sun Times “exposes” secret trial by P&G, Wal-Mart
• Feb. 2005: Brittan Elementary School District in Sutter, Ca., is forced to drop plans to use RFID to take attendance
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
20
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
More RFID debacles . . .• Jan. 2004: Errant e-mail suggests GMA
wants to smear Katherine Albrecht
• Feb. 2004: Metro drops RFID loyalty card after CASPIAN exposes that it was using RFID without informing customers
• May 2005: State Dept. agrees to additional protection for RFID passports after uproar
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
21
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
• Enron
• WorldCom
• Global Crossing
• Parmalat
• Adelphia
Recent business scandals have contributed to a negative opinion of businesses
• El Paso Energy
• ImClone
• Cendant
• Sunbeam
• Royal Ahold
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
22
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
• The U.S. Patriot Act
• Tapping international calls
• Using SWIFT data on transactions
• JetBlue handing over passenger data
The war on terror has kept the issue of privacy and freedoms in the headlines
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
23
WHY WE CAN’T BE COMPLACENT
• “We had many of the same [privacy] concerns with bar codes. They will go away when people get more comfortable with the technology.” —Auto-ID industry veteran
Will the problem go away?
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
24
WHY WE CAN’T BE COMPLACENT
• The European Union requires labels on most genetically modified foods
• European consumers have generally rejected genetically modified foods
• The debate over genetically modified foods has led to an increase in sales of organic foods
What if it doesn’t?
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
25
WHY WE CAN’T BE COMPLACENT
• What can the industry do to stop this?• Can we turn the tide of negative publicity?• Can we convince people that vendors and
end users are sincere about protecting their privacy?
• Can we convince people that RFID will deliver massive benefits to them, as well as to businesses
RFID may be the next “frankenfood”
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
26
WHAT WE CAN DO
We have to try!
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
27
WHAT WE CAN DO
• Sustained PR effort
• Consistent response to irresponsible media articles
• Education of journalists and other influencers
• Present a united front
It’s time to focus on the consumer
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
28
WHAT WE CAN DO
• Form a small RFID Privacy Coalition
• Coordinate activities of AIM, EPCglobal, NRF, AAFA, etc.
• Sustain a PR campaign aimed at consumers
• Raise money to support the effort
• Hold events for journalists, influencers
• Get media savvy
How we can get this done?
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
29
WHAT WE CAN DO
Get end users to commit to
truly protecting consumer privacy
AIDC 100 — Oct. 5, 2006
30
CONTACT INFORMATION
Thank you
Mark Roberti
Founder & Editor
RFID Journal