Top Banner
Set-based Concurrent Design Eric Peabody The Design Partnership Architects + Planners 415 345-3813 [email protected]
20

AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

May 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Eric Peabody

The construction industry is one of the only industries with declining productivity. Tools like BIM, IPD, and Lean aim to reverse this trend. Set-based Concurrent Design is a Lean alternative to the traditional iterative design loops and enables projects to be designed 10 to 15 times faster.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Set-based Concurrent DesignEric Peabody

The Design Partnership ■

Architects + Planners

415 345-3813

[email protected]

Page 2: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Set-based Concurrent Design What is Set-Based? Set-Based Detailing Set-Based Design Choosing by Advantages Results

Page 3: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Why Do We Care?

Page 4: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

What is Set-Based Design?

• Iteration in design is part value added and part waste– Understanding the problem and range of

solutions is value added– Rework and time delay is waste

• “Posing alternative design solutions as sets, rather than as point solutions is the strategy at the heart of…set-based design.”

• (Ballard, Lean Construction Institute, “Positive vs Negative Iteration in Design”)

Page 5: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Iterative Loops

Set-based Design

Page 6: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Iterative Design Set-Based Design• Sequential processing adds

time• Release incomplete work for

others to start evaluating• Simultaneous evaluation of

options

• Select best alternative as quickly as possible to move to next stage

• Carrying multiple options allows more time for analysis

• Defer commitment to avoid premature decisions with incomplete knowledge

• One design contribution can invalidate all previous work

• Identifying a problem with an option reduces the design space but does not trigger rework

Page 7: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Set-Based Detailing

SET 1

SET 2SET 3

Page 8: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Set-Based Design1. Divide design into interchangeable

chunks

2. Multiple simultaneous designs for each chunk

3. Evaluate Combinations

4. Select a combination set• Choosing by Advantages

5. Swap chunks at roadblocks

Page 9: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

VA Palo Alto, Aquatic Center

Page 10: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Design Sets: Massing

Page 11: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Design Sets: Roof Structure

Page 12: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Design Sets: Skin Design

Page 13: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Design SetsCombinations: n1*n2*n3…nn= many sets

Massing: 7 optionsRoof Structure: 4 optionsSkin Design: 6 options

7*4*6=168 design sets

Which is the best option?

Page 14: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Choosing by Advantages• The Fundamental Rule of Sound Decision-making:

• Decisions must be based on the importance of advantages.• Pros & Cons = double counting

1. Identify Attributes:• Cake vs Cereal for Breakfast

• Calories• Taste

2. Identify Difference in Attribute Value:• Cake for breakfast = 500 calories• Cereal for breakfast = 200 calories

• Difference = 300 calories

Page 15: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Choosing by Advantages3. Identify Advantage

• Calories:• Cake has 300 more calories• Cereal has 300 fewer calories• Advantage:

• Cereal’s advantage is 300 fewer calories • Cake has no calorie advantage

• Taste: • Cake tastes very good.• Cereal tastes okay.• Advantage:

• Cake’s advantage is it tastes much better • Cereal has no taste advantage

Page 16: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Choosing by Advantages4. Evaluate the Importance of the Advantage

5. Select the option with the highest Advantage• Cereal for breakfast

Cake CerealCalories

No Advantage 0 300 Fewer Calories 10

Taste Tastes Much Better 5 No Advantage 0

5 10

Page 17: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Selecting an Option

9 55 0

0 12 1

0 88 0

0 106 10

0 83 3

7 50 0

16 3724 14

Page 18: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

The Design Partnership LLP

Architects + Planners

Swap Chunks• Initial Client Selection

• Massing: Courtyard• Roof Structure: Bow String• Skin Design: Green Screen w/ Translucent Top

• Road block 1: Roof maintenance safety• Keep Massing & Skin Design• Trade Roof Structure: Flat for Bowstring

• Road block 2: 30% scope increase• Keep Skin Design & Roof Structure• Trade Massing: New Massing Option

• Road block 3: Contextuality• Keep Massing & Roof Structure• Trade Skin Design: Rainscreen for Green Screen

Page 19: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

The Design Partnership LLP

Architects + Planners

Radically Accelerated Schedule

• Typical Project Schedule: • 30 to 45 minutes per SF for design.

• Radically Accelerated Schedule:• 30,000 SF in 4 months – Programming through CD

3 minutes per SF for design (10 to 15 times faster)

Page 20: AIA NTAP Conference Set Based Design

Set-based Concurrent DesignEric Peabody

The Design Partnership ■

Architects + Planners

415 345-3813

[email protected]