Ahsd - All Documents | The World Bank · Web viewPopulation characteristics. The 2008 recorded population in Ladangpanjang was 10,434 people, consisting of 2,613 family units (Kelompok

LARAP Link 047.2 Padangsawah-Simpangempat

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE SPECIFIC NON-VERTICAL TASK FORCE OF ROAD

AND BRIDGE PLANNING AND SUPERVISION (P2JJ) PROVINCE OF WEST SUMATERA JL. Rasuna Said No. 85 A Padang 25114 Phone (0751) 70 51556 Fax (0751) 70 51556

DraftLARAP STUDY

(Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan)

PADANGSAWAH-SIMPANGEMPAT (STRETCH 047.2) AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIA GADANG BRIDGE IN PASAMANT BARAT

ROAD PRESERVATION PROJECT

Pasaman and Pasaman Barat RegenciesWest Sumatra (Sumatra Barat) Province

March 2011

Road and Bridge Improvement Project of West Sumatera Province i

RP1040 V9


TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1II. SOCIAL ECONOMIC SURVEY AND ASSET INVENTORY 4Result of socio-economic research 9Public perception into the project 14Compensation 15III. COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 15IV. ACTION PLAN 21Land acquisition 21Procedures and process for land acquisition 22Complaint handling procedures 22Monitoring and reporting 25Operational Schedule 25Matrix of Action Plan 26

Annex 1: Detailed list of affected people and assets Annex 2: Sample form of documentation on socialization and consultation meeting Annex 3: Flow chart of grievance redressed mechanismAnnex 4: Sample form of monthly monitoring report of LARAP implementation

Road and Bridge Improvement Project of West Sumatera Province ii


LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Administration Site of Road Widening Plan for stretch 047.2 and Bridge Construction

2

Table 1.2 Technical Dimension of National Road Stretch Widening Plan for Padangsawah - Simpangempat

3

Table 2.1 Population on Study Area of Pasaman Regency (Condition on 2008) 4Table 2.2 Resident’s Main Profession (ten years above) in Ladangpanjang Village

(condition on 2008) 4

Table 2.3 Compilation of Population in Study Area of Pasaman Barat Regency (condition on 2008)

5

Table 2.4 Main Profession Compilation of Nagari Residents (ten years above) in Study Area of Pasaman Barat Regency (condition on 2008)

6

Table 2.5 Questionnaire Distribution based on Study Area 8Table 3.1 Governmental Standard Price based on Building Construction 16Table 3.2 Market Price of Building based on Function and Construction 16Table 3.3 Market Price of other Building under Dimension and Type of Construction 17Table 3.4 Study Result of LARAP for Economic Plants 17Table 3.5 Governmental Standard Price for Economic Plants 17Table 3.6 Market Price (Estimation) for Economic Plants 18Table 3.7 Cost Recapitulation of LARAP for National Road Improvement of

Padangsawah – Simpangempat Link 047.218

Table 3.8 Compensation Fee Recapitulation for Road Widening of Pasangsawah – Simpangempat in Pasaman Regency

19

Table 3.9 Compensation Fee of Resident’s Building in Pasaman Regency 19Table 3.10 Compensation Fee Calculation of other Resident’s Building in Pasaman

Regency 19

Table 3.11 Compensation Fee Recapitulation for Road Widening of Pasangsawah – Simpangempat in Pasaman Regency (Replace Its Table)

20

Table 3.12 Compensation Fee for Resident’s Building under Administrative Area in Pasaman Barat Regency

20

Table 3.13 Compensation Fee Calculation for other Resident’s Building in Pasaman Barat Regency

20

Table 3.14 Compensation Fee for Resident’s Economic Plants in Pasaman Barat Regency 21Table 3.15 Handling cost of Nagari Market Area 21Table 3.16 Action-Plan for Land Acquistion

Road Stretch Improvement of Padangsawah – Simpangempat (Stretch 047.1)in Pasaman Regency

26

Table 3.17 Action-Plan for Land Acquistion Road Stretch Improvement of Padangsawah – Simpangempat (Stretch 047.1) and Construction of Aia gadang Bridge in Pasaman Barat Regency

29

Road and Bridge Improvement Project of West Sumatera Province iii


INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. Background. The Indonesian Government, through the Ministry of Public Works, plans to implement a project of capacity improvement for the National Road segment of Padangsawah – Simpangempat (Stretch 047.2) and the construction of the Aia Gadang Bridge (herein collectively referred to as ‘the Project’), located in the District of Pasaman and District of Pasaman Barat, Province of West Sumatera. This project will be financed by a loan from the World Bank through its Western Indonesia National Road Improvement Project (WINRIP). The road segment falls within the Sumatra Central Corridor, which is an alternative road for distributing goods and services on Sumatra.

2. National road widening for the Project will be undertaken to enhance road performance and smooth transportation to and from Padang (Teluk Bayur Seaport). Widening activities will take place in the Right of Way alongside 4040, 693 KM from KM 134+200 till KM 174-893 from Padang City. New bridge construction will take place close to the current Aia Gadang Bridge, in accordance with Government Regulation Number 38/2004 on Roads.

3. Though widening will take place in Right of Way area, there will still be land acquisition activites for buildings, plants and other assets belonging to Project Affected Persons (PAPs). Meanwhile, bridge construction activities will require acquiring land belonging to local communities (ulayat). Acquisition activities will affect sidewalk traders and areas for vehicles to park on the road shoulder at Kinali and Tampuruang Market. These areas are a major area for traffic jams on Monday and Sunday respectively. Because acquisition activities activity will have an impact on the current socio-economic environment, according to Operational Guideline 4.12 of the World Bank, a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) is required.

4. LARAP activities will examine the current state of land, building and plant assets in the area. Using a participatory approach for local communities to provide their inputs on the Project, the authorities will develop a framework for acquisition activities needed for construction. The road widening activities between Padangsawah – Simpangempat will not require resettlement. The result of a preliminary study on the construction results and effects on local communities will be made into the basis of a land acquisition process with the following purposes:

Gather information on the social and economic conditions of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) whose land or other assets are affected by the project, and to determine the aspirations of local inhabitants regarding the Project as well as their requested compensation for assets affected by the Project or land acquisition;

Prepare policy alternatives for land acquisition and resettlement toward PAPs; Prepare a workplan for land acquisition and resettlement as guidance as well as planning

efforts for the land acquisition and resettlement process for PAPs; Propose a market restructuring pattern for Pasar Bawan according to the aspirations

of local communities, under the assumption that road widening will be able to enhance road performance without causing serious social issues.

5. Project Location and Description. This Project along the West-Track Trans Sumatra along 40,693 KM is intended to improve road performance and ease transportation routes to and from Padang (Teluk Bayur Seaport). Administratively this activity lies in two (2) regencies and four (4) sub-districts that include one village-level unit (Nagari) as noted in Table 1.1. A location map of the Project is included in Figure 1.1.

Road and Bridge Improvement Project of West Sumatera Province 1


Table 1.1 Administration Site of Road Widening Plan for stretch 047.2 and Bridge ConstructionNo. REGENCY/ SUB-DISTRICT NAGARI REMARK A. REGENCY OF PASAMAN1. Subdistrict of III Nagari Ladang Panjang Link Road 047.2B. REGENCY OF PASAMAN BARAT1. Subdistrict of Kinali Kinali Link Road 047.22. Subdistrict of Luhak Nan Duo Koto Baru Link Road 047.23. Subdistrict of Pasaman Lingkuang Aua Link Road 047.2

Aia Gadang Bridge of Aia Gadang

Figure 1.1 Location Map of the Project Setment

6. Stretch 047.2 starts in Padangsawah, Nagari Ladang Panjang, Regency of Pasaman and ends in Simpangempat, Nagari Lingkuang, Regency of Pasaman Barat. This represents a distance from KM 134+200 to KM 174+893 from Padang City. If reviewed from its administration area, then only 2,200 Km of this road stretch lies within the Pasaman Regency, namely from KM 134+200 to KM 136+400, and along 38,493 Km are within the Pasaman Barat Regency from KM 136+400 till KM 174+893. Meanwhile, construction of Aia Gadang Bridge will begin from KM 284+062 to KM 284+424 from Padang City.

7. As noted above, market facilities in Kinali and Tampuruang markets fall adjacent to the roadside. On market day once in a week, namely on Monday and Sunday respectively, traffic jams are frequent as a result of market spill over on the roadside and also because of parked vehicles. There are frequent efforts to better manage the space used by traders but these activities have not been completely successful.

Figure 1.2 Images of Pasa Kinali and Pasar Tampuruang Traffic Conditions



8. Technical aspects. Based on a Detailed Engineering Design (DED) study, a road widening project will enlarge the road by 7m of carriage way, complete with a road shoulder and drainage channel. Further technical dimensions of the widening plan are presented in Table 1.2 below. The Aia Gadang Bridge will be constructed with the existing bridge, with a length of 100 m and a width of 9m. This section of the Project will also include improvements to the two-track bridge.

Table 1.2. Technical Dimension of Padangsawah – Simpangempat Sub-ProjectNo. Planning Unit Dimension1. Width of Road Surface meter 7,002. Width of Road Stretch (Left and Right) meter 4,003. Width of Drainage (Left and Right) meter 1,004. Hardening Normal Inclination % 2,005. Road Shoulder Inclination % 4,00

Source: P2JJ Province of West Sumatera, 2010

9. Process and Methodology. The identification of affected assets belonging to either community groups, corporations or the state was conducted through a field study by considering its position in relation to the existing Right of Way. Asset recording in Right of Way is undertaken for futher examination. Research on public assets will be conducted through enumeration by considering the following issues:

People’s Assets. Public buildings are distinguished by whether they are permanent, semi-permanent or non-permanent; their function as a house or business place; and their location on the roadside in relation to Padang City. Other Buildings are identified by considering the kinds of terrace, fences, culvert and decker, land limit foundations and other assets. The economic value of plants and other assets were also considered by calculating numbers, types and location. The types of plants included Palm, Chocolate, Coconut, Areca, Teak and other Fruit plants such as Mango, Guava, and Durian.

Public Assets. Some public facilities belong to the government or businesses. These include electric and telephone poles, an underground cable network, and a clean water pipeline. A survey recorded the numbers of these assets and their sites. The economic activities of sidewalk traders and persons parking on the roadside close to the Kinali and Tampuruang markets were also scrutinized in order to examine the potential impact of the Project on their physical space. There were also focus group discussions (FGD) with participants from Government (staff of Regency, Sub-District, and Village-level governments, public figures and community leaders, and academic and non-governmental organizations. Finally, there was a free interview (spotcheck) with selected respondents.

10. Social Data Research. The LARAP study is a descriptive field research exercise to obtain information regarding the social-economic conditions of the communities around the Project site. The study isneeded to obtain information on public opinion towards the planned road enlargement of the National Road from Padangsawah to Simpangempat as well as the construction of the Aia Gadang Bridge in Pasaman and Pasaman Barat Regencies.

11. The research will use survey research methods, wherein information is compiled from asset owning respondents affected by the widening of the roads and construction of the bridge, as well as sidewalk traders in Kinali and Tampuruang markets. Questionnaires were provided that obtained information regarding aspects of community life that will be affected by the planned Project activities. Four major aspects to be revealed by the study are:

Characteristics or conditions of local people’s socio-economics aspect;



Socio-economic environment of the community; Social knowledge of the Project plans; Public perception of the Project plans;

12. Besides the primary data to be obtained above, the LARAP also drew on secondary data from relevant sources such as the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) at the Regency level and various governmental agencies within the Regency administration. This secondary data focused on the socio-economic and cultural profiles of the affected communities, laws and regulations governing the price assessment of affected goods, as well as models for compensation payment mechanisms. All data and results were used for the purposes of LARAP. These data can be used at a later data by the Land Acquisition Committee (LAC) as part of a more detailed database in order to prepare the land acquisition process and compensation payments.

SOCIAL ECONOMIC SURVEY AND ASSET INVENTORY

13. Identification of Project Affected Persons and Assets. The administrative territory applicable to this LARAP falls within 2 (two) regencies and 4 (four) sub-districts: 1 (one) sub-district in Pasaman Regency, namely Sub-district III Nagari, and 3 (three) sub-districts in Pasaman Barat Regency namely Kinali, Luhak Nan Duo and Pasaman. Each sub-district includes one Nagari (same level as a Village unit) repectively Nagari Ladang Padanjang in Pasaman Regency and Nagari Kinali, Koto Baru and Lingkuang Aus in Pasaman Barat Regency. Meanwhile, the construction of Aia Gadang Bridge lies in Nagari Aia Gadang, Sub-district of Pasaman, and Regency of Pasaman Barat.

14. Land in these areas is mainly used for plantation areas of oil-palm, cocoa, corn and other plant products. In the subdistricts of Kinali and Tampuruang, there are markets once a week, Monday at Kinali and Sunday at Tampuruang. There are often traffic jams as a result of economic activity spill over and parked vehicles.

Pasaman Regency

15. Population characteristics. The 2008 recorded population in Ladangpanjang was 10,434 people, consisting of 2,613 family units (Kelompok Keluarga, or KK), as indicated in Table 2.1. Population density provides a picture of the number of inhabitants per km2 within nagari, in this case the lowest administrative level. Based on this administrative boundary of approximately 62.16km2, the population density of Nagari Ladangpanjang is 168 people/km2. This district lies at a T-intersection between three regional government centers: Lubukbasung in Agam, Simpangempat in Pasaman Barat and Lubuksikaping in Pasaman.

Table 2.1 Population Statistics for Pasaman Regency (2008)

No. Area Study Landmass (km2)

General Data on Demography

Man (people)

Woman (people)

Total (people)

Numbers of KK

Density (people/km2)

1. Sub-district of Tigo Nagari a. Nagari Ladang Panjang 62,16 5.289 5.145 10.434 2.613 168

Source: Subdistrict in Year Number 2008, (processed from respective areas).

16. Residents’ livelihood along the Project area is dominated by agricultural activities, which in this case includes plantations sustained by industrial business and plantation crop processing. This way is also seen from financial sector, Company’s Leasing and Service and other services that has close-relationship with plantation sector, such as banking, business cooperative, heavy equipment rental and other plantation production utilities.

Table 2.2 Residents’ Main Profession (10 Year Above) in Nagari Ladangpanjang (2008)



No. Main Profession Total (Life) Remark

1 Agriculture 7.6532 Excavation Mining 953 Processing Industry 1344 Building 415 Trading, Hotel & Restaurant 4906 Transportation & Communication 1117 Finance, Rental & Service 4168 Services 3239 Other 564

Total 9.427Source: Sub-district in Year Number 2009, (processed from respective areas)

17. Land-use Patterns and Ownership. Land use in Pasaman Regency depends on its existing natural and human resource potential, as well as the area’s topography, geomorphology, and the local community’s unique social cultural characteristics and culture. The Project’s location lies at a site developed for a plantation business and has high levels of productivity. A large portion of the surrounding area has previously been used for plantation activities. Based on a district-level survey, almost the entire area is used by the surrounding community, either by local residents, non-resident cooperatives, or by agricultural investors. Land ownership falls mainly with the Ulayat Kaum and Ulayat Nagari, belonging mainly to certified companies and individuals. This indicates that in general, land ownership characteristics in Minangkabau are closely tied to local development undertaken by large plantation companies.

18. Socio-cultural characteristics. The community structure of the local population is dominated by the Minangkabau ethnicity, followed by members of the Mandailing, Javanese, Nias and other ethnicities. Although there is a dominant ethnic group in terms of numbers of residents, patterns of interaction suggest relatively harmonious relations. Instead, social relations are dominated by residents’ groupings in agricultural cooperatives and other social community groups.

Pasaman Barat Regency

19. Population characteristics. The population in the Nagari (village level) adjacent to the outlined road area is 111,056 persons and 23,520 households. The population spread follows the administrative boundaries provided in Table 2.3. There are more male residents (56,595) than female residents (56,461). The majority of the population is in Kenagarian Kinali, Subdistrict of Kimali (25.134 people), whereas the lowest population are 10.434 people is in Kenagarian Aia Gadang in Pasaman Regency. There are no significant populations of indigenous people present in this area.

Table 2.3 Compilation of Population in Area Study (Condition on 2008)

No. Area Study Landmass (km2)

General Data of Demography

Man (people)

Woman (people)

Total (people)

Numbers of KK

Density (people/km2)

1. Subdistrict of Kinalia. Nagari Kinali 365,57 25.314 24.158 49.472 8.663 1352. Subdistrict of Luhak Nan

Duoa. Nagari Koto Baru 211,10 12.785 12.349 25.134 6.041 1193. Subdistrict of Pasamana. Nagari Lingkuang Aua 158,54 13.292 12.724 26.016 6.360 164b. Nagari Aia Gadang 130.44 5.204 5.230 10.434 2.456 80

Source : Subdistrict in Year Number 2009, (processed from respective areas)



20. Population density. Population density provides a picture of the number of inhabitants per km2

within nagari, in this case the lowest administrative level. Based on the administrative boundaries intersected by the Project areas reaching 735,210 km2, the population density range is between 80 – 164 people per-km2 with an average density of 151 people/km2. The most crowded area (164 people per km2) of residents is in Kenagarian Aua, Subdistrict of Luhak Nan Dua and the lowest is in Kenagarian Aia Gadang, Subdistrict of Pasaman, with approximately namely around 80 people per km2.

21. Economic characteristics. Residents’ livelihood along the enhanced road stretch is detailed in Table 2.4. Residents are mainly engaged in agricultural activities, in this case mainly large plantatations sutained by industrial business of plantation crop processing. These employment patterns are also seen in the financial sector, including leasing services and other services that have close relationships with the plantation sector, such as banking, business cooperatives, heavy equipment rentals and other plantation production utilities.

Table 2.4 Main Profession Compilation of Nagari Residents (ten years above) in Study Area (2008)

No. Main Profession Sub-district

Amount Kinali Luhak Nan 2 Pasaman

1 Agriculture 14.880 7.559 18.379 40.818 2 Excavation Mining 202 61 70 333 3 Processing Industry 452 111 320 8834 Electricity and Clean Water 5 1 16 22 5 Building 71 83 834 988 6 Trading, Hotel & Restaurant 2.027 803 805 3.635

7 Transportation & Communication 115 32 666 813

8 Finance, Rental & Service 1.516 381 710 2.607 9 Services 2.425 729 522 3.676 10 Other 30 21 8 59 Total 21.723 9.781 22.330 53.834

Source: Subdistrict in Year Number 2009, (processed from respective areas)

22. Utilization Pattern and Land Ownership. Land use patterns in Pasaman Barat regency are similar to those in Pasaman regency. The Project site falls in areas developed for the plantation business and with high productivity value. Nearly the whole land area has been utilized by local residents, non-resident cooperative members, or plantation investors. Land ownership status comprises Ulayat Kaum and Ulayat Nagari, and belongs to certified companies or individuals.

23. Socio-Cultural Characteristics. Similar to Pasaman Regency, the community structure of the local population is dominated by the Minangkabau ethnicity, followed by members of the Mandailing, Javanese, Nias and other ethnicities. Although there is a dominant ethnic group in terms of numbers of residents, patterns of interaction suggest relatively harmonious relations. Instead, social relations are dominated by residents’ groupings in agricultural cooperatives and other social community groups.

Identification results of field data

24. Field research used a questionnaire survey approach after socialization efforts were completed. This was complemented with open-ended interviews and focus group discussions. These methods were used to obtain and identify all lands, buildings and plants with economic value within the Right of Way of the Project site and the bridge construction area. The census survey was conducted on 16-26 November 2010. This date will be the cut of date to record affected persons in the project area who are entitled to compensation, resettlement assistance and livelihood restoration assistance. In case there is a time gap between the LARAP approval and the implementation of the WINRIP project or sub-project under



WNRIP, the Land Acquisition Committee will do verification of the current situation based on the list of affected people and assets from the survey.

25. Assets owned by PAPs within the Right of Way on Section 047.2 and the brige construction in the second sub-district are spread throughout sixty two (62) persons. These assets are categorized in the form of land with landmasses of 320 m2 owned by 2 people; houses or business buildings facing the Right of Way owned by 42 people; and other buildings such as fences, culverts or house terraces and other plants with economic value belonging to 13 people. Description of respective assets under the administration area is explained below. A detailed data table on PAPs is included in Annex 1, including appendix 1a-1e.

26. Project-Affected Assets in Pasaman Regency. Based on result of field data processing, three units are affected by the Project:

1 unit of shack used as garage; 1 unit semipermanent used as small-shop; 1 semi-permanent unit used as house.

27. Both building in the Right of Way will be affected by between 75% - 100% of its landmass. Therefore, they should be dismantled and be replaced by new structures in the lands of the respective land owners close to or behind the Right of Way being used. Other assets affected are terrace of one house and 1 palm-tree in the Right of Way.

28. Project-Affected Assets in Pasaman Barat Regency. Land. Construction of the Aia Gadang bridge will require land belonging to neighboring

communities, where currently there are two buildings standing. The Project will require at leas 320m2 of land belonging to 2 affected people on which had erected 2 units of building and need to be displaced. The status of the affected land is communal land but already acknowledged as private ownership (such as girik). The remaining lands are still large. The 2 affected people will rebuild their replacement building on the remaining land.

Building. Based on the results of data management, widening of the road of the Project will affect 37 building units and for the bridge construction 2 units will be affected. A description of the buildings affected by the Project includes:

i. Twenty five (25) shacks, of which twenty four are used four businesses and 1 unit is a residence;

ii. Ten (10) semipermanent units used for business; iii. Four (4) permanent units, 2 of which are houses and the rest are small-shops.

As many 25 shack units and 8 semipermanent buildings in the Project’s Right of Way are affected by more than 75% till 100% of their landmass, meaning that they must be dismantled. They will be relocated into their own land close to or adjacent to the Project.

1 semipermanent building and 2 permanent buildings will be affected by the Project’s land acquisition. Meanwhile 2 units of permanent buildings located in communal land (Ulayat) that has traditional status due to bridge construction should be dismantled because they will be affected by more than 75 % of their landmass, meaning that the owner should move. Nevertheless because the owners are members of the Ulayat, these buildings will be moved to the closest ulayat space. Following the results of the research, they are asking for compensation in the form of cash money following a subsequent agreement.

Other Buildings in the Right of Way. Observation result and field data found that 6 other building sites belong to residents are built in the Project’s Right of Way. Those buildings are in form of culvert and fence as explained below:

i. Culverts in 2 sites; ii. Fences in 4 sites

Economic Plants in Right of Way. Plants with discernible economic value that lay in the Project’s Right of Way number as follows: 34 trees owned by 12 Households, consisting of Palm, Cocoa, Coconut, Areca and other fruit trees such as Mango, Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum), and Jackfruit. Details include:



i. Palm 17 stemsii. Cocoa 12 stems

iii. Areca 5 stems Government and Corporate-Owned Assets. Public and corporate-owned asset affected by the

road widening include electric and telephone poles, cable-line of underground optical-fibre and PDAM network in the Simpangempat area.

29. Kinali and Tampuruang Market. Kinali Market, as well as Bawan Market on Stretch 047.1 are forms of Nagari Markets that are open once a week on Mondays, while Tampuruang Market open every Sunday. On other days, a portion of the shops and food stalls are open but only serve the adjacent community and no sidewalk traders present. The shops and food stalls in the market are all outside of the Project’s Right of Way, though on market days to becomes very crowded and a number of sidewalk traders spill into the street and cause traffic to worsen. These conditions are aggravated by unorganized parking. The Administration of Nagari Kinali has tried to better manage this situation but their efforts have been unsuccessful. Total sidewalk traders in Kinali Market occupying ROW and should be moved, based on data from Nagari, will be 15 persons, whereas side walk traders using road rollen-empty land between building and border of ROW, are around 10 persons. The numbers every week vary. This condition is the same with Tampuruang Market. Sidewalk traders on the road shoulder generally sell daily household needs such as vegetables, fruits, dried fish, and other needs like kitchen tools and finished clothes. Particularly traders of agricultural crops make transactions if they get products from farmers. This LARAP’s study succeeds to interview 7 respondent side walk traders in Kinali Market, consisting of 4 occupy the road shoulder and 3 are in the road rollen, and 11 respondents in Tampuruang Market (9 occupying road shoulder and two are selling in the road rollen). Nevertheless, considering both locations are also in the widened road stretch, then these sidewalk traders are affecting arrangements.

30. Questionnaire: Project-Affected Asset. A study conducted from 16 – 18 November 2010 in both regencies showed that as many as 60 people (96.77% of the total respondents) will be affected across 4 Sub-districts and 4 Nagari as explained in next table. Data in Table 2.5 shows that thet rate of respondents in Nagari Kinali, Subdistrict of Kinali, describes that many residents erect the building or its eqipments, or cultivate economic plant in right of way. This way is caused by their ignorance on the function and ownership of right of way, and lack of supervision from relevant parties.

31. Questionnaire: Sidewalk Trader of Kinali and Tampuruang Markets. Total respondents of sidewalk traders in both markets interviewed upon research conducted on Sunday and Monday at January 16 and 17 are as many 18 people, 7 people in Kinali and 11 people in Tampuruang respectively include those selling in road-rollen and road shoulder. This amount represents for those affected widening impact.

Table 2.5 Questionnaire Distribution based on Area Study

No. Study Area Landmass (km2)

Total (Life) Respondent (KK)

Remark Resident Head of Family Total

Percentage

A. Regency of Pasaman1. Sub-district of III Nagari

Nagari Ladang Panjang 62,16 10.434 2.613 5 0,191 100% PAPSub-Total 62,16 10.434 2.613 5 0,191

B. Regency of Pasaman Barat 1. Sub-district of Kinali a. Nagari Kinali 365,57 49.472 8.663 49 0,566 100% PAP2. Sub-district of Luhak Nan

Duo

a. Nagari Koto Baru 211,10 25.134 6.041 6 0,099 100% PAP



3. Sub-district of Pasaman a. Nagari Lingkuang Aua 158,54 26.016 6.360 - - b. Nagari Aia Gadang 130.44 10.434 2.456 2 0,081 100% PAP

Sub-Total 735,21 111056 23.520 57 0,0242Total 797,37 121.490 26.133 62 0,237

Source : Subdistrict in Year Number 2009, (processed) and Field Research 2010

RESULT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESEARCH

32. Main Occupation of PAPs in Regency of Pasaman. One of the 5 respondents whose assets are affected by the Project, 2 are working as farmers, two are in service sector and one is a trader. The socio-economic condition of respondents can be seen from their respective jobs. There were 57 respondents in 3 nagaris in 3 sub-districts interviewed for theis research as demonstrated in Tables 2.1 and 2.2. This is the same amount (100%) as the number of households affected by acquisition for both buildings and land. Of all respondents, most are employed as farmers (61.4%) and traders (19.3%).

Figure 2.1.Diagram of Respondent Based on Profession in Pasaman Regency

Figure 2.2.Diagram of Respondent based on Profession in Pasaman Barat Regency

33. Income Level of PAPs in Regency of Pasaman. Of the 5 respondents who were interviewed regarding their income level, 1 said that he earned more than IDR 1.500.100 per month and 3 other people earned between Rp 500.000.- till IDR1.000.000,- per month. This is shown in Figure 2.3 Beyond that, 2 respondents have additional income between IDR 300,000 and 500,000/month and 1 respondent earns more than IDR 800,000 per month. Meanwhile 2 respondents did not provide answers.

Figure 2.3 Diagram of Respondent’s Income in Pasaman Regency

Road and Bridge Improvement Project of West Sumatera Province

Based on income of main job

Unanswered

Month Month

Based on main job

Unanswered

Service TraderFarmer

Respondent is based on Main Profession Based on main job

Unanswered

Farmer Worker ServiceOjek/Driver TraderPrivate Employee Farmer Public Servant/TNI/Polri

9


Figure 2.4 Diagram of Respondents’ Extra Income in Pasaman Regency

34. Income Levels of PAPs in Regency of Pasaman Barat. From 57 respondents who were asked their income levels, 24 respondents say their income is between Rp 500.000.- till IDR1.000.000 per month and 16 other respondents earn more than Rp 1.500.000.- per month.

Figure 2.5 Diagram of Respondent’s Income in Pasaman Barat Regency

35. Respondents’ income in this regency is relatively greater than other research area. Respondents’ also still have extra-income from other business. 12 respondents earn extra income more than IDR 800.000 per month and 11 respondent say that they have extra-income among Rp 500.000 till IDR 800.000,- per month as seen in this diagram below.

Figure 2.6 Diagram of Respondent’s Extra-Income in Regency of Pasaman Barat

36. Number of family members in PAPs in Regency of Pasaman. Two respondents have between 7 – 9 family members, and 2 respondents have 4 – 6 family members. The smallest amount was 1 respondent who had 4 family members.

Figure 2.7 Diagram of Respondent is based on Total Family Number in Pasaman


Based on additional employment

Unanswered

Month

Month

Unanswered

Month

Month

Month

Respondent of Family Member that becomes commitment

Unanswered PersonsPersons

Persons

Unanswered

Respondent is based on Part-time Profession Income

Month

Month

Month

Month

None

10


37. Number of family members in PAPs in Regency of Pasaman Barat. Respondents in this regency have small family member (31,58%) to middle (57,89%) with total family member among 4 – 6 persons per family.

Figure 2.8 Diagram of Respondents based on Total Family Member in Pasaman Barat

38. Educational Level of PAPs in Regency of Pasaman. Average respondents have educational levels of Elementary School till Senior High School Graduates. Two of five respondents have educational levels of Senior High School graduate. Meanwhile educational level of respondents, 4 and 5 are Senior High School graduate.

Figure 2.9. Diagram of Respondent based on Education in Regency Pasaman

39. Educational Level of PAPs in Regency of Pasaman Barat. Average respondents in this location are relatively higher than peripheral area namely 42, 11% have educational level of Senior High School graduate and 35,09% have educational level of Junior High School graduate as presented in the following diagram.

Figure 2.10 Diagram of Respondent based on Educational Level in Regency of Pasaman Barat

40. Expected impact of Project on Economic Activities in Regency of Pasaman. Road widening activity is perceived will impact into comprehensive soci-economic life in society. But during implementation of its construction, 3 of 5 respondnets feel their economic business will be interrupted.


Educational Level

Unanswered

Elementary School graduate

Senior High School graduate

Junior High School graduate

Respondents based on Educational Level

Unanswered

Elementary School graduate Academic graduate

Senior High School graduate

Junior High School graduate


Unanswered

Persons

Persons

Persons

11


Figure 2.11 Diagram of Project Influence into Economics in Regency of Pasaman

41. Expected impact of Project on Economic Activities in Regency of Pasaman Barat. It’s only 10,33% respondents stating that activity implementation is not interfere with public economic activity, whereas 75.44 % state they are interrupted.

Figure 2.12 Diagram of Project Influence into Economics in Regency of Pasaman Barat

42. Income level of Affected Sidewalk Traders in Kinali and Tampuruang Markets. From 7 respondents of sidewalk trader of Kinali Market who probed on their income level, only 1 person has low income from IDR 500.000 per month, whereas 6 other persons, respectively 2 persons have income among IDR 500.000 till IDR 1.000.000, among IDR 1.000.000 till IDR 1.500.000 and above IDR 1.500.000 monthly as presented below.

Figure 2.13 Diagram of Sidewalk Respondent’s Income in Kinali Market

43. Reviewed from total of family number, then sidewalk respondents in Kinali Market average are middle and small family with total of small family member in 4 persons and with family member 4 – 6 persons as the following graph.

Figure 2.14 Diagram of Respondent based on Total of Trader’s Family Member in Kinali Market

44. Income level of sidewalk traders in Tampuruang Market shows a nearly apportionment, either for the lowest Rp 500.000 monthly or for the higher than IDR 1.500.000 monthly.

Figure 2.15 Diagram of Sidewalk Respondent’s Income in Tampuruang Market


Does implementation of road construction interferes with your economic/business activity?

Unanswered

No Yes

Respondents based on selling income

month

month

month

month


personspersons

Respondents based on selling income

month

monthmonth

month

Does implementation of road construction interferes with your economic/business activity?

Unanswered

No

Yes

12


45. From eleventh respondents, only one is big family, whereas 7 other people are small family with number of family member 4 people.

Figure 2.16. Diagram of Respondent based on Total of Trader’s Family Member in Tampurang Market

46. Educational level of sidewalk traders. Average respondents of sidewalk traders in Kinali Market have educational level of Junior High School and Senior High School Graduates. Respectively 42,86 %, meanwhile in Tampurang Market are dominated by Junior High School and Elementary School Graduates. These educational levels are influential to one’s insight and mind-set and result of interview, questionnaires filling and response to the project.

Figure 2.17 Diagram of Responden’s Educational Level in Kinali Market

Figure 2.18 Diagram of Responden’s Educational Level in Tampuruang Market

47. Perception of sidewalk traders on Project. Networking of trader’s perception is necessary done before beginning of widening activity, in order that known how many are residents supporting or rejecting this activity. Result of research indicates that all respondents in both markets say to agree and very agree. No respondents disagreeing or rejecting road widening.

Figure 2.19 Diagram of Trader’s Perception in Kinali Market concerning Activity Plan

Figure 2.20 Diagram of Trader’s Perception in Tampuruang Market concerning Activity Plan



people

peoplepeople

Educational Level

Senior High School Graduate

Junior High School Graduate

Elementary School Graduate

How about your opinion into widening plan of this road?

Very agree agree

Elementary School Graduate

Educational Level

Unanswered

Senior High School Graduate

Junior High School Graduate

Not graduate Elementary School

How about your opinion into widening plan of this road? 13


48. In other side, traders highly know that consequence of this widening will interfere with their existence in bith markets. But based on questionnares, it seems that 5 of 7 traders in Kinali Market and 8 of 11 traders in Tampuruang Market are ready to be arranged and relocated in location offered by government, namely pertinent market site.

Figure 2.21 Diagram of Sidewalk Traders’ Response in Kinali Market Concerning Market Arrangement

Figure 2.22 Diagram of Sidewalk Traders’ Response in Tampuruang Market Concerning Market Arrangement

Public perceptions of the project

49. Regency of Pasaman. Result of questionnaire in Pasaman indicates that 60% of PAPs feel that their economic activities are interrupted, but 80% agree with the widening plan. 1 respondent did not provide an opinion.

Figure 2.23. Diagram of Residents’ Perception concerning Activity Implementation In Regency of Pasaman

Figure 2.24 Diagram of Residents’ Attitude concerning Activity Implementation In Regency of Pasaman


In case your selling place is affected to road construction, where do you move?

Move into other site that self-sought near to original place

Move into other site offered by government

In case your selling place is affected to road construction, where do you move?


Unanswered Agree

Move into other site offered by government

Move into other site that self-sought near to original place

Very agree agree

Unanswered No Yes

Does implementation of road construction interfere with your economic/business activity?

14


50. Regency of Pasaman Barat. 74,55 % of respondents in Regency of Pasaman indicated that their economic activities would be interrupted during construction, but all agree or highly agree that the widening should take place. 2 respondents did not provide opnions.

Figure 2.25 Diagram of Resident’s Perception about Activity Implementation in Regency of Pasaman Barat

Figure 2.26 Diagram of Resident’s Attitude about Activity Plan In Regency of Pasaman Barat

Compensation

51. Regency of Pasaman. PAPs prefer to deliberate on compensation rates before undertaking decisions regarding compensation. They agree fully with the deccision mechanism stated in the Government Regulations. However, if studied from desirable compensation form, 80% of residents want financial compensation and 20 % dosent give opinion.

Figure 2.27. Diagram of Desirable Compensation Form from Pasaman’s residents

52. Regency of Pasaman Barat. Similar to respondents in Regency of Pasaman, 55 of 57 respondents in Pasaman Barat desire financial compensation.

Figure 2.28. Diagram of Desirable Compensation Form from Pasaman residents


Does implementation of road construction interfere with your economic/business activity?

Unanswered No Yes


Unanswered

Very agree

agree

Does the form of replacement for building/economic plants affected to road widening plan

Unanswered

Compensation

Does the form of replacement for building/economic plants affected to road widening plan

Unanswered

Compensation15


COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

53. Principle of compensation. A policy taken by the Project initiator so that all public assets affected by the Project will be compensated. Compensation may be in the form or cash payments or reconstruction of the affected assets following agreements between asset owners/ Project Affected Persons and the Government. The LARAP study will calculate a budget of the compensation costs to be made available for later implementation.

54. Compensation for land. Compensation for the affected land will be based on its real replacement cost or market price. The sum of compensation will be jointly discussed between the PAPs and Local Government based on land valuation made by Independent Land Appraisal Team in accordance with land acquisition mechanism (as spelled out in Presidential Decree No. 36/2005; Presidential Decree RI No. 65/2006 and the Head of Land Agency Regulation No. 3/2007) on land acquisition for public purpose. The appraisal result will be given to the Land Acquistion Committee (LAC) as a basis for conducting negotiations with PAPs. Costs of any registration and transfer taxes will be paid by the Government.

55. For the budget needs of this LARAP, an analysis has been conducted to assume compensation rate for the affected lands. The assumptions were made by considering market price, the location and the function of affected asset. The market price of the land in the site presently based on the LARAP’s analysis is as much 75.000/m2. This analysis will become input to Independent Land Appraising Team. However, the market price of the land for LAC’s reference during negotiation will come from the Land Appraisal Team.

56. Compensation for Buildings. Affected buildings will be compensated based on material market prices for replacement buildings. A thorough LARAP analysis on market price of affected building is conducted in order for involved PAPs to rebuild their acquired assets for budget estimations. This analysis is conducted by considering Government Standard Price and market prices of materials, types and function/usage of the building and asset dimension. The analysis is conducted without calculating depreciation value. This price will then be proposed to the Human Settlement Agency as inputs that then will be given to LAC for negotiation with PAPs. The result of analysis is that the market price ranges of the building from IDR 2.000.000 – 3.000.000/m2 for permanent buildings and IDR 1.000.000 – 1.500.000/m2 for semipermanent buildings, and IDR 175.000-500.000/m2 for shack buildings. It is also presented standar price from government and from market price as comparison.

Table 3.1 Government Standard Price based on Building Construction

No. Construction of Bulding Function Price x IDR1.000/m2)

1. Permanent Shop 425.000,02. Semipermanent Shop 310.000,03. Shack Stall 145.000,04. Permanent House 550.000,05. Semipermanen House 400.000,06. Shack House 175.000,0Source: Administration of respective Regencies 2010 (processed)

Table 3.2 Market Price of Building based on Function and Construction

No. Construction of Bulding Function Price x IDR1.000/m2)

1. Permanent Shop 3.000.000,02. Semipermanent Shop 1.500.000,03. Shack Stall 250.000,0



4. Permanent House 2.500.000,05. Semipermanen House 1.250.000,06. Shack House 200.000Source: Study Result in respective Regencies 2010 (processed)

57. Market pricing for buildings acquisition accounts for size and age of construction, location and function of building and pertinent area development prospect. Studies found that buildings functioning as stalls or shops are more expensive per m2 in the capital city than similar buildings far from the Government center (rural). Subsequently, houses are cheaper than shop or stall buildings. This is consistent for all forms of construction: permanent, semipermanent and shacks.

58. Compensation for other affected structure. Residents’ fences and terraces falling in the Right of Way will be replaced through compensation. The results of questionnaires and interviews with owners of the terraces and fences reveals that a portion of the PAPs want the physical product to be re-constructed by the Project, and another portion prefer financial payment as agreed by the LARAP study. Because the Government has no standard for the reconstruction of these assets, a thorough analysis should be done for affected assets. Compensation costs are explained below and are a result of the LARAP study done by considering dimension and type of resident’s fence and terrace.

Table 3.3. Market Price of Other Buildings under dimension and type of construction

No. Construction of Building Function Price under study result of LARAP Remark

A. Terrace2. Permanent Cement-Floor 250.000,04. Semipermanent Cement-Floor 200.000,05. Wooden Frame of Cement-Floor 150.000,06. Wooden Frame of Ground-Floor 100.000,0B. Fence

Iron Fence of Stone-Frame 100.000,0Stone-Fence 150.000,0

C. Ground Border Foundation (Helical)Relocation Fee of Border Foundation 50.000,0

Source : Result of Study 2010 (processed).

59. Economic Plants Price. Compensation for affected plants will be based on age and size of the affected plant and also presently crop price. An analysis on the compensation rate for the affected plant was conducted as inputs for responsible institutions (Agriculture/Plantation Agency) and also for LAC and to estimate budget. This analysis used Government Standard Price and also market price from the survey result. The result of the analysis is on Table 3.6 and ranges from IDR 2.500.000 – 1.500.000/tree for cropped plam plants and not too old (highly productive) and RP 1.500.000 – 1.000.000/tree for palm had been aged more than 20 years or still bear fruit of sand.

Table 3.4 Study Result of LARAP for Economic PlantsNo. Type of Plants Standard Price (IDR/batang)

Big Middle Small 1. Palm 600.000,0 1.000.000,0 350.000,02. Coconut 200.000,0 300.000,0 150.000,-3. Chocolate 450.000,0 600,000,0 200.000,04. Areca 150.000,0 200.000,0 100.000,05. Other Fruits 150.000,0 250.000,0 100,000,0

Source : Result of study in respective Regencies 2010 (processed).

Table 3.5 Government Standard Price for Economic Plants based on age or size



No. Type of Plants Standard Price (IDR/stem)

Big Middle Small 1. Palm 250.000,0 200.000,0 100.000,02. Coconut 75.000,0 60.000,0 40.000,03. Chocolate 200.000,0 175.000,0 100.000,04. Areca 75.000,0 60.000,0 40.000,05. Other Fruits 100.000,0 75.000,0 50.000,0

Source : Administration of respective Regencies 2010 (processed)

Table 3.6 Market Price (estimation) for Economic Plants based on field research (type, age and presently crop price)

No. Type of Plants Standard Price (IDR/stem)

Big Middle Small 1. Palm 500.000,0 750.000,0 250.000,02. Coconut 175.000,0 250.000,0 100.000,-3. Chocolate 350.000,0 600,000,0 150.000,04. Areca 125.000,0 160.000,0 60.000,05. Other Fruits 125.000,0 250.000,0 75,000,0

Source : Administration of respective Regencies 2010 (processed)

60. All affected buildings and assets will be dismantled after compensation payments are finished and construction of the replacement buildings is completed. Research into market prices and and problem handling efforts of road widening and market condition that always spill upon market day is conducted through structured discussion and interview, and continued with focus discussion group (FGD). Result of research indicates that residents realize that every day the market always crowded and occurrence of traffic jam and hope existence of market area arrangement. Therefore, executive society of road widening project, namely P2JJ Province of West Sumatera may outright undertake arrangement with parking and stall yard preparation for sidewalk traders.

61. Existence of sidewalk trader stall and vehicle parking, either trader’s fleet, village transportation, or private two-wheel vehicle and ojek in every market day namely on Friday, had caused traffic jam in this road stretch. Though residents realize this, but heretofore had not been problem-solving effort like sidewalk trader arrangement or vehicle parking.

62. Action plan submitted for this problem is parking yard and sidewalk trader yard as well. Required landmass for Tampuruang Market is 1.500 m2 and 1000 m2 for Kinali Market just with surface hardening of asphalt construction. This effort certainly requires land preparation besides the hardening itself in Bawan Market area around 20-30’s from the border of right of way. Outlet arrangement will be surrendered to market administrator namely the administration of Nagari, where this project-stricken people are prioritized to obtain this place.

63. Estimated Compensation Budget. The estimated value of public assets is IDR 1.789.200.000, as shown in Table 3.7. Preparation is needed for land compensation payments, house buildings, garage-shop, other economic facilities, and other public building such as fences, home terraces or residents’ land border, and economic plants that all lie in the Right of Way. This budget is allocated for the improvement of some market utilities in Kinali and Tampuruang. These cost are also allocated for the LACs, both at the Regency and Provincial levels. The financing for respective regencies is described below in Table 3.7.

Table 3.7 Recapitulation of LARAP Costs for National Road Stretch Impovement (Padangsawah – Simpangempat Link 047.2)



No. Description RAB RemarkA.1.2.3.

REGENCY OF PASAMAN Compensation of Building Compensation of Terrace and Other Building Costs of Land Acquisition Committee and Compensation

66.400.000,004.400.000,0015.000.000,00

Sub-Total 84.400.000,00 Regional Revenues and Expenditure Budged I&II

B.1.2.3.4.5.

REGENCY OF PASAMAN BARATCompensation of land Compensation of Building Compensation of Terrace and Other BuildingsCompensation of Econmoic Plants Market handling cost *)Costs of Land Acquisition Committee and Compensation

225.000.000,00578.800.000,007.800.000,0025.200.000,00707.000.000,0060.000.000,005.

Sub-Total 1.603.800.000,00 Regional Revenues and Expenditure Budged I&II

C.1.

EVALUATION AND MONITORING FEE Money by Directorate General of Highway Construction and Maintenance

100.000.000,00APBN

TOTAL 1.789.200.0000,00

Pasaman Regency

64. Compensation for Pasaman Regency following the LARAP study is as much as IDR 86.400.000, as showin in Table 3.8.

Table 3.8 Recapitulation of Compensation Fee for Widening Padangsawah – Simpangempat in Regency of Pasaman

No. Description RAB1.2.3.4.

Compensation of Building Compensation of Terrace and Other Buildings Compensation of Economic Plants Costs of Land Acqusition Committee and Compensation

66.400.000,004.400.000,001.000.000,0015.000.000,0086.400.000,00

65. Building Compensation. Compensation rates for three (3) units of residents’ shacks and permanent stalls lying in the Right of Way are as high as IDR 66.400.000, as seen on Table 3.9.

Table 3.9 Compensation Fee Calculation of Resident’s Building In Regency of Pasaman

No. Administration Area ConstructionNumbers of Building (Unit*)

Landmass (m2)*)

Analysis Result of LarapPrice/m2(Rp)

Amount(Rp)

1 Nagari Ladang Panjang

Permanent 1 16 2.500.000,0 40.000.000,0

Semipermanent 1 12 1.500.000,0 18.000.000,0Shack 1 21 400.000,0 8.400.000,0

Total 66.400.000,0

66. Other Building Compensation. Compensation for other residents’ buildings, such as fences and culverts in the Right of Way shows that the compensation rates are as high as 4.000.000,00. This is shown in Table 3.10.

Table 3.10 Compensation Fee Calculation of Residents’ Other Buildings In Regency of Pasaman

No Administration Area Construction Numbers of Building

Landmass (m2)*)

Analysis Result of LarapPrice/m2 Amount



(Unit*) (Rp) (Rp)1 Ladang Panjang Terrace 1 8 500.000,0 4.000.000,0

Total 4.000.000,0

67. Economic Plant Compensation. There is just one (1) plant of economic value falling in the Right of Way of the Project in Pasaman Regency. The costs are as much as IDR 1.000.000.

Pasaman Barat Regency

68. Calculation results of public asset value for compensation in Regency of Pasaman Barat including Management fee for 2 Nagari Markets that should be provided by government for stretch widening 047.2 Padangsawah – Simpangempat and construction of Aia Gadang Bridge as much IDR 1.603.800.000,- as Table 3.11 shows. This budgeting is required for land compensation payment, house building, stall and garage, and other resident’s building such as fence, terrace or land border and all economic plants lying in right of way. This fund is also allocated to improve some parts of the Kinali and Tampuruang market facilities so their existence doesn’t undermine the road improvement and increase expenses for the LACs at both the Regency and Provincial levels.

Table 3.11 Recapitulation of LARAP Costs for National Road Stretch Impovement: Manggopoh - Padangsawah – Simpangempat

No. Description RAB1.2.3.4.5.6.

Compensation of landCompensation of BuildingCompensation of Terrace and Other Buildings Compensation of Economic PlantsMarket Handling Fee *) Costs of Land Acqusition Committee and Compensation

225.000.000,-578.800.000,-7.800.000,-25.200.000,-707.000.000,-60.000.000,-1.603.800.0000,00

69. Land Compensation. Residents’ land compensation in Aia Gadang is based on a study analysis result of LARAP that considers the results of interviews, focus group discussions and questionnaires. This is shown in Table 3.12 Section A and is as much as IDR 225.000.000,00.

70. Building Compensation. Compensation rates for 25 units of shack buildings, 10 units of semipermanent buildings, and 4 units of residents’ permanent buildings are based on a study analysis result of LARAPs calculated by virtue of market price of building materials wihout calculating depreciation value after considering result of interview, FGD and Questionnaires. Result of calculation tally as high as IDR 578.800000,00 as seen in Table 3.12 section B.

Table 3.12 Compensation Fee Calculation of Residents’ Building Land under Administration Area

No Administration Area ConstructionNumbers of Building(Unit*)

Landmass (m2)*)


Amount(Rp)

A Land 1 Nagari Ladang

PanjangPermanent 2 90 2.500.000,0 225.000.000,0

Sub total 225.000.000,0B Building 1 Nagari Kinali Permanent 2 33 2.500.000,0 82.500.000,0

Semipermanent 10 121 1.500.000,0 181.500.000,0Shack 22 376 2.000.000,0 752.000.000,0

2 Nagari Koto Baru Permanent 2.500.000,0 -Semipermanent 1.500.000,0 -Shack 3 73 200.000,0 14.600.000,0

3 Nagari Ala Gadang 2 90 2.500.000,0 Subtotal

Total 803.800.000,0



71. Compensation for other residents’ buildings, such as fences and culverts in the Right of Way shows that the compensation rates are as high as IDR 7.800.000,0 as shown in Table 3.13.

Table 3.13 Compensation Fee Calculation of Residents’ Other Buildings

No Administration Area ConstructionNumbers of Building(Unit*)

Landmass (m2)*)


Amount(Rp)

1 Nagari Ladang Panjang Fence 1 20 150.000,0 3.000.000,0Culvert 2 18 90.000,0 1.800.000,0

2 Nagari Koto Baru Fence 3 35 150.000,0 3.000.000,0Total 7.800.000,0

72. Economic Plants Compensation. Compensation rates for plants with economic value are based on results from a study analysis of LARAP, by considering the results of intrerviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires. The compensation rates tally as high as IDR 25.200.000,00. Meanwhile governmental pricing and market prices for public plants with economic value are contained in Annex 3.

Table 3.14 Compensation Fee Calculation of Residents’ Economic Plants under Administration Area

No Administration Area Type Number ofTrees *)


Amount(Rp)

1 Nagari Ladang Panjang Palm 17 1.000.000,0 17.000.000,0Cocoa 12 600.000,0 7.200.000,0Areca 5 200.000,0 1.000.000,0

Total 25.200.000,0

73. There are differences of unit pricing under government calculation, market price and analysis of LARAP. This is caused by a government decision from the previous year when crop prices were in pressed condition. These days the crop prices are in good condition and tend to ascent. Furthermore this justification is expected get legitimation from respective regency government upon compensation will be paid later.

74. Calculation of costs for Kinali and Tampuruang markets. The costs of handling 2 units of market along this road stretch are shown in Table 3.15. Differences in handling costs are adjusted by pertinent market conditions. Kinali Market needs fencing whereas Tampuruang Market does not require fencing. Subsequently, the prepared landmass is also different: Tampuruang Market requires 1.500 m2 and Kinali Market requires 1,000 m2.

Table 3.15 Handling Cost of Nagari Market Area in Regency of Pasaman BaratNo Location RAB*) Remark1 Kinali Market, Regency of Pasaman Barat a Land Procurement 1.000m’ @ IDR 50.000 50.000.000,00b Hardening 1.000 m’ @ IDR 300.000 300.000.000,00c Road border fencing 35 m’ 7.000.000,00

Sub-total 357.000.000,002 Tampuruang Market, Regency of Pasaman Barat a Land Procurement 1.500 m’ @ IDR 50.000 75.000.000,00b Hardening 1.500 m’ Rp 300.000 350.000.000,00

Sub-total Subtotal 350.000.000,00Total 707.000.000,00



IV.ACTION PLAN

Land acquisition

75. Land Acquisition Policy. Although road improvement projects may not require formal land acquisition because they are conducted within the road’s Right of Way, they still require forms of land acquisition due to the local community’s economic activities that fall into the road. The regulations and laws governing land acquisition for the public interest are:

Act Number 5 Year 1960 concerning Basic Regulation of Agrarian Principles (Government Gazette of Republic of Indonesia Year 1960 Number 104, Additional Gazzette Number 2043);

Act Number 51 PIDR Year 1960 concerning Prohibition of Land Utilization Without Permit from The Authorized Party or It’s Proxy (Government Gazette of Republic of Indonesia Year 1960 Number 158, Additional Gazzette Number 2106);

Act Number 20 Year 1961 concerning Revocation of Rights on Land and Aboveground Property (Government Gazette of Republic of Indonesia Year 1961 Number 288, Additional Gazzette Number 2324);

Act Number 14 Year 1992 concerning Road Traffic; Act Number 24 Year 1992 concerning Space Arrangement ; (Government Gazette of

Republic of Indonesia Year 1992 Number 115, Additional Gazzette Number 3501); Act Number 32 Year 2004 concerning Local Government ; Act Number 38 Year 2004 concerning Highway ; Act Number 36 Year 2005 concerning Land Procurement in order to Development

Implementation for Public Interest ; Presidential Regulation Number 65 Year 2006 concerning Amendment of Presidential

Regulations Number 36 Year 2005 concerning Land Procurement in order to Development Implementation for Public Interest ;

Regulation of Head of National Land Board Number 3 Year 2007 concerning Operational Provision of Presidential Regulation Number 36 Year 2005 concerning Land Procurement in order to Development Implementation for Public Interest as amended with Presidential Regulation Number 65 Year 2006 concerning Amendment on Presidential Regulation Number 36 Year 2005 concerning Land Procurement in order to Development Implementation for Public Interest ;

Decree of Governor Number 600/335/P.II/Bang dated October 8, 2010 concerning Declaration Letters of Free Land

Letters of Specific Non-Vertical Taskforce Head for Road and Bridge Construction and in West Sumatera on October 11, 2010 concerning Declaration Letters of Commitment of Environmental Management and Monitoring (SPPL)

World’s Bank Operational Policy Number 4.12 concerning Involuntary Resettlement

76. Formation Policy of Land Acquisition Committee. The Padangsawah – Simpangempat highway on the West Track Trans-Sumatera Road administratively crosses over two regency administration areas, namely Pasaman and Pasaman Barat. Therefore, land acquisition in these areas will fall in accordance with Presidential Regulation Article 6 paragraph (3), assisted by provincial LAC established by the Governor. The provincial LAC will work together with the Project initiator to undertake coordination with the Regency LAC established by the Regent.

Procedure and process for land acquisition

77. First Phase. Under prevailing provisions, every project or sub-project requiring land acquisition should conduct preparatory studies following Presidential Regulation Number 36/2005, Presidential Regulation Number 65/2006 and Regulation of Head of National Land Board Number 3/2007 concerning Land Procurement for the Development of the Public Interest. Therefore, following the World Bank’s Operational Policy (OP) 4.12, a LARAP is required for the Padangsawah – Simpangempat project.



78. The study will include an inventory of assets, including buildings and plants with economic values belonging to PAPs, as well as a socio-economic survey and Project socialization, consultations and community forums. The study will look to obtain as accurate as possible information on residents’ building and plants with economic value, public utilities and infrastructure existing in the Project’s Ruight of Way that will have to be acquired, the appropriate market-value based rates and the subsequent mechanisms for compensation.

79. Administrative Preparation Phase. Following the study results of the LARAP, the Road and Bridge Improvement Project of West Sumatera Province, through the Service Head of Highway Infrastructure, Layout and Settlement of West Sumatera Province will extend a Decree of the West Sumatera Governor in order to establish a Provincial LAC with a committee structure comprising nine elements that are considered as representing all involved parties ni the Government and will be referred to Committee IX of the Province (or Provincial Land Acquisition Committee).

80. Following that the LAC will ask the Governor of West Sumatra to write a letter to The Regent of Regency of Pasaman and Pasaman Barat informing that it will undertake land acquisition activities from local residents’ in the Project’s Right of Way along the Padangsawah – Simpangempat stretch in order to widen the road. Following this the respective Regents will also establish the Committee IX of the Regency Regency Land Acquistion Committe) that later shall handle the compensation process.

81. Beside that, as first step in preparing this activity of LARAP, it had been conducted workshop on December 16, 2010 by Directorate General of Highway Construction and Maintenance through Directorate of Technical Development by involving stakeholder such as Head of Subdistrict from respective subdistricts in Regency administration area, Regency Government coming from Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda), Public Work and National Land Board and Provincial Government that also coming from Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda), Public Work and National Land Board and Consultant side. This workshop is to do socialization and consultation of Land Acquisition Policy Framework.

82. Socialization Phase for Project Affected Persons. Provincial Land Acquisition Committee (LAC). The provincial LAC will handle the land

acquisition process by inviting the Regency LAC to coordinate and share information contained in the LARAP. This information involves:o Socialization of the LARAP study resulto Coordination, task-sharing and competence o Composing activity schedule of land acquisition o Making and preparing draft of Regent’s Decree concerning Compensation rate for

affected building including fence and terrace and other affected structure – and affected plants.

Regency LAC. Regency Land Acquistion Committee will conduct socialization in respective working areas for residents on the Land Acquisition process and compensation payments for land, buildings and plants affected by the Project, with the assistance of the authorities from the Sub-District and Nagari levels, along with public community leaders. This event will be attended by the Provincial Land Acqusition Commitee and the Project Party. On this implementation, Committee is assited by Head of Subdistrict and Nagari’s Head. o Head of Subdistrict charges of inviting all interested parties such as Nagari’s Head,

Public Leader of respective Nagari, especially people who have land, buildings and plants will be affected by the project.

o Socialization on physical work of Project will be submitted by project partyo Socialization about compensation methods, including grievance redress mechanism will

be submitted by Regency Land Acquisition Committeeaccompanied by Provincial Land Acquisition Committee.

o All socialization and consultation meeting conducted will be documented (see form annex 2)



83. In addition to socialization, the Regency LAC is responsible for the following: Undertake measurement and benchmarking on the affected assets; Undertake calculation/inventarization of residents’ assets that will be compensated; Notify result of research and assist asset inventarization; Facilitate establishment of Independent Monitoring Team and Independent

AppraisingInstitution/Team for Land. comprising elements from government of respective regencies such as Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda), Public Work Service, Land Service, Agricultural Service plus from University/academician who is capable of assessing the value of land, If necessary, the membership of Land Appraisal Team may be added with the representatives of NGOs;

Receive appraisal result for land from Indepdent Land Appraisal Team, and estimate the compensation rates for affected buildings and plants for the responsible institution; market price for affected buildings from the Local Public Works Agency and market price of affected plant from the Agricultural Agency;

Conduct deliberations to achieve agreement with PAPs concerning the form and rate of compensation;

Set the agreement on compensation to the affected assets; Undertake compensation payment to PAPs; Accommodate every complaint and proposal from PAPto be deliberated for its solution and

the result is publicized; Prepare implementation report of LARAP monthly during its working term; Prepare implementation report of LARAP into The Regent, Monitoring and Reporting Team

and WINRIP;

84. Measurement and Calculation of Compensation; Detailed measurement in the field on land, building and plants affected to the project is

witnessed by the owner and undertaken by Regency Land Acquisition Committee and attended by Project Party and provincial Land Acquistiion Committee;

Announcing the result of measurement to public through Socialization Meeting of Phase II. For a part of residents have not known explicitly their assets affected by the project, they may ask for the committee to remeasure on size of their affected assets;

After land measurement process finishes and numbers of land, building and plants have been recorded accurately, then Independent Apparising Institution/Team will appraise value of affected land and responsible institutions will issue price for affected Building and Plant;

Residents are given opportunity to submit their objection on their assets affected to project in consultancy process phase provided thereto;

85. Compensation Payment Phase. Provincial and Regency LACs along with the Project authorities will hold internal meetings on the compensation payment procedures for buildings, plants and other assets affected by the Project. Payment will be made to communities that are ready and have prepared the necessary documents that will be examined during the time of payment. Every community member receiving compensation will be photographed with the foreground the compensation rate received in accordance with the type of asset acquired. Therefore, the LAC must also prepare all relevant documents and documentation:

Compensation for land, building and other structureo Photo Copy of Resident’s Card Number; o Photo Copy of Land Certificate or other Documents of Land Ownership for building that

some of other are in right of way and/or; o For Ulayat land, should be documents form Ninik Mamak, Nagari’s Head, Head of

Subdistrict and have no problem with law, and/or;o Statement letter from Head of Nagari on building ownership that wholly is in right of

way. Economic Plants



o Photo Copy of Resident’s Card Numbero Statement letter from Head ofNagarion plant ownership that respectively cultivated in

right of way

Complaint handling procedures

86. PAPs unsatisfied with the land acquisition process can file complaints, objections or proposals to the respective Regency Governments acting as program caretakers or to LAC. Those complaints, objections and proposals can be delivered directly or by correspondence to the address of the respective Regent’s Offices or to the Head of Non-Vertical Task-Force for Road and Bridge Construction of West Sumatera Province Jl. Rasuna Said No. 85 A Padang, 25114 Phone. (0751) 70 51556, Fax. (0751) 70 51556.

87. Complaints, objections or proposals to LARAP implementation will be processed via the following steps:

The Regency Government and WINRIP, represented by the Chairmen of Bappeda in the two regencies, the Head of the Non-Vertical Task-Force for Road and Bridge Construction of West Sumatera Province, and the Monitoring and Reporting Team will conduct a investigation on the specifics of the complaint, objection or proposal in question.

The results of this investigation will be notified to the PAPs at least twelve (12) days after the complaint was made, and then discussions will take place to try to resolve the conflict following a ‘win-win’ solution principle.

All complaints handling will be documented and made accessible to the public. In order to facilitate this process, results will be disseminated through available public spaces such as the publication board in the project office, Head of Subdistrict’s Offuce and Nagari’s Office. This is detailed in a flow chart in Annex 3.

88. In the case that no consensus over the sum of compensation is made between PAPs and the Local Government after a year, the sub-project will be excluded from the WINRIP Program or will seek alternatives for realignment.

Monitoring and reporting

89. Land acquisition done after the implementation of the LARAP will still require efficient evaluation and monitoring on the part of the Regency and Provincial Governments, as well as by the DGH.

90. The Regency government of Pasaman and Pasaman Barat will create a monitoring and reporting team upon beginning the Work Plan and Land Acquisition processes. The team will comprise members of the local colleges and universities, non-governmental organizations, and representatives from the PAPs. Monitoring and report activities will be conducted with the view of supervising program implementation, particularly land acquisition, making sure that all follows plans and procedures, and fulfils the expected goals and targets.

91. Tasks of the Monitoring and Reporting Team : Undertake supervision activities for program implementation as enclosed in the Action Plan

(Annex 2), which include socialization activities, public consultancies, including making annexes on compensation prices that will be created by a subsequent independent appraisal. The monitoring will continue until all RAP’s activities and commitments have been met.

Convene monthly coordination meetings with the LAC, Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda) and Project, to discuss problems and constraints faced in the Project and how to overcome them, particularly those related to complaints and objections from the community.

Produce monthly progress reports to WINRIP using a form provided by the project authorities. On carbon copy should be the Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda) and Non-Vertical Task-Force for Road and Bridge Construction of West Sumatera Province and Social



Safeguard Unit of World’s Bank. The report should contain information about the LARAP implementation progress, such as detailed data of socialization, result of land appraisal, type and amount of compensation and the progress of payment, any complaints submitted by PAP and the resolution, social-economic progress of the affected people (especially the displaced persons). A sample is contained in Annex 4.

OPERATIONAL SCHEDULE

92. The operational schedule for compensation payments begins at the preparation phase, and is followed by the community consultations and socialization to PAPs, the measurement of owernshhips boundaries and the fee negotiation for Budgetary Year 2011. Budget for LARAP implementation will come mostly from local budget (APBD), with small portion from national budget (APBN). Please see action plan below.



LAND ACQUISITION ACTION PLANPADANGSAWAH – SIMPANGEMPAT ROAD SECTION (SECTION 047.2) IMPROVEMENT

IN PASAMAN REGENCY, WEST SUMATRA PROVINCE

No. Program Location Activity Output Unit Responsible party

Implementation Schedule

Cost Needed

Cost SourceRegency Budget 2011

Province Budget 2011

State Budget 2011

1 LARAP Preparation Pasaman Regency

District III Nagari

District III Nagari

1. Invetorying economic valued building and plants within Road Area2. Making socio-economic survey in 1 district, organizing socialization, consultation and discussion3. organizing socialization, consultation and discussion with community

LARAP study report prepared during land acquisition process

1 package P2JJ or SNVT Road and Bridge construc tion of West Sumatra Province

Oct 2010-Jan 11

LS

2 Land Acquisition Team (TPL)

1. West Sumatra Province for Provincial Level, Pasaman Regency for regency level

1. Establishment of PPL for Widening Project2. Land acquisition implementation work plan making in District III Nagari3. Facilitating the establishment of Independent Monitoring Team4. Conducting activity of prepared work plan

-

Establishment of Land Acquisition Committee of Provincial and Regency Levels- Land Acquisition Work Plan Document

2 Packages West Sumatra Provincial AdministrationPasaman Regency Administation

Jan 2011 1.000.000

1.000.000

3 Establishment/Confirmation on Independent Assessor Team for Building and Plant Price

Pasaman Regency 1. Land Acquisition Committee of Pasaman Regency submits Price Assessor Team determined by Regent.2. Assessing building and plant price based on:- Current year’s NJOP or Tariff that has been determined in advance. - Market price by referring to such variables as location, position, conformity of land use and spatial planning, and available facility and infrastructure & other factor

-

Establishment of Price Assessor Team-

Compensation basic price input

1 Package Pasaman Regency Administration

Jan 2011



influencing price.- Request for price by people affected by the land acquisition

3 Socialization of Land Acquisition to would-be WTP

District III Nagari 1. Inviting would-be the building and plant of which will be affected2. Socializing land acquisition plan3. Socializing way of compensation calculation and payment.4. Signing Socialization Report

- Project plan and Land acquisition are socialized, along with its Minutes of Meeting and Attendance List.

1 Package Land Acquisition Committee attended by P2JJ and SNVT of Road and Bridge Construction of West Sumatra

Feb 2011

4 Identification and Inventory

District III Nagari 1. PPL to measure land boundary to be acquired (as per LAND AREA) together with WTP. Project and Nagari official2. Joint determination of building boundary and tree to be affected 3. Calculating people’s assets to be affected.4. Making Surveying and Boundary Staking Report

- Pole of boundary is staked for the building to be acquired.- List of WTP and assets to be affected.- Map of building and plant affected by the project is made


March 2011

5 Discussion to determine the amount of compensation

District III Nagari 1. Discussion with WTP2. Agreement on the amount and form of compensation3. Calculation of Compensation value by Independent Price Assessor Team based on result of measurement and boundary pole staking4. Agreement on Compensation Payment Schedule5. Drawing up Minutes of Negotiation,Discussion

-

Discussion/negotiation process implemented along with its Minutes of Meeting and List of Attendant

Lumpsum Land Acquisition Committee attended by P2JJ and SNVT of Road and Bridge Construction of West Sumatra

March 2011

6 Land Acquisition Implementation

District III Nagari 1. Making Payment of Building and Plant Compensation

- People’s building and Plant

3 Units Land Acquisition

April 2011 66.400.000

66.400.000



2. Compensation Payment Process Documentation 3. Signing of Payment Letter

Compensation Paid

- People’s building terrace and fence compensation paid

2 Locations

Commitee

4.000.000

4.000.000

8 Monitoring and Evaluation Program Implementation

District III Nagari 1. Establishment of Monitoring Team (Internal and External) Implementation of Monitoring and evaluative of activity plant implementation by PPL

2. Final Evaluation of work performance by External Monitoring Team

- Internal Monitoring Team Established with Regent Decree

- External Monitoring Team Established -

Monitoring Report Document

Lumpsum

P2JJ or SNVT of Bengkulu provincial Road Constrution

Pasaman Regency Administration

2011-July 2

2011-July 2

25.000.000

25.000.000

3. Recommendation on follow up activity that must be carried out

LARAP Implementation

Total Cost 96.400.000

71.400.000

25.000.000

Lubuksikaping, January 2011Pasaman Regent



No. Program Location Activity Output Unit Responsible

partyImplementation Schedule Cost Needed

Cost Source

Remarks Regency Budget 2011

Province Budget 2011

State Budget 2011

1 LARAP Preparation West Pasaman RegencyKinali,Luhak Nan Duo and Pasaman District Kinali,Luhak Nan Duo and Pasaman DistrictKinali District

1.

Invetorying economic valued building and plants within Road Area2. Making socio-economic survey in 3 districts, organizing socialization, consultation 3. organizing socialization, consultation and discussion with community.4.

Conducting FGD in Kinali District and Pasaman District

LARAP study report prepared during land acquisition process

1 package P2JJ or SNVT Road and Bridge construction of West Sumatra Province

Oct 2010-Jan 2011

LS

2 Land Acquisition Team (TPL)

1.

West Sumatra Province for Provincial Level, 2.West Pasaman Regency for regency level

1.

Establishment of PPL for Widening Project2. Land acquisition implementation work plan making in Kinali, Luhak Nan Duo and Pasaman Districts3.

-Establishment of Land Acquisition Committee of Provincial and Regency Levels-Land Acquisition Work Plan Document

2 Packages

West Sumatra Provincial AdministrationWest Pasaman Regency Administation

Jan 2011 60.000.000 60.000.000



Facilitating establishment of Independent Monitoring Team.

3 Establishment/Confirmation on Independent Assessor Team for Building and Plant Price

West Pasaman Regency

1. Land Acquisition Committee of West Pasaman Regency submits Price Assessor Team determined by Regent.2. Assessing building and plant price based on:- Current year’s NJOP or Tariff that has been determined in advance. - Market price by referring to such variables as location, position, conformity of land use and spatial planning, and available facility and infrastructure & other factor influencing price.- Request for price by people affected by the land acquisition

-Establishment of Price Assessor Team-Compensation basic price input

1 Package West Pasaman Regency Administration

Jan 2011 Cost for the Land Acquisition Committee and Independent Team is fully charged to Provincial Budged

3 Socialization of Land Acquisition to would-be WTP

Kinali, Luhak Nan Duo and Pasaman District

1. Inviting would-be ETP whose building and plant will be affected2. Socializing land acquisition plan3. Socializing

-Project plan and Land acquisition are socialized, along with its Minutes of Meeting and Attendance List.

1 Package Land Acquisition Committee attended by P2JJ and SNVT of Road and Bridge

Feb 2011



way of compensation calculation and payment.4. Signing Socialization Report

Construction of West Sumatra

4 Identification and Inventory


1. PPL to measure land boundary to be acquired (as per LAND AREA) together with WTP. Project and Nagari official2. Joint determination of building boundary and tree to be affected 3.

Calculating people’s assets to be affected.4. Making Surveying and Boundary Staking Report

-Pole of boundary is staked for the building to be acquired.-List of WTP and assets to be affected.-Map of building and plant affected by the project is made


March 2011

5 Discussion to determine the amount of compensation


1. Discussion with WTP2. Agreement on the amount and form of compensation3.

Calculation of Compensation value by Independent Price Assessor Team based on result of measurement and boundary pole staking

-Discussion/negotiation process implemented along with its Minutes of Meeting and List of Attendant

Lumpsum Land Acquisition Committee attended by P2JJ and SNVT of Road and Bridge Construction of West Sumatra

March 2011



4. Agreement on Compensation Payment Schedule5. Drawing up Minutes of Negotiation,Discussion

6. Land Acquisition Implementation


1.

Implementation of people’s Building and Plant Compensation Payment2.

Compensation payment process documentation3. Signing of Payment Letter

-People’s Building Compensation paid-People’s terrace and fence paid-Plant Compensation Paid

61 units

17 units175 Trees

Land Acquisition Committee

April 2011 578.800.000.00

578.800.000.00

Form and amount of compensation are the price obtained from agreement with WRP during negotiation

7.800.000 7.800.000

25.200.000 25.200.000

7. Kinali Market and Tampuruang Market Layout

1. Provision of Parking lot for Kinali Market and Tampuruang Market2. Provision of area for Kinali Market and Tampuruang Market Street Vendors

-Parking Lot and Street Ventors at Kinali and Tampuruang Market laid out.

-Monitoring Team Established

1 Package

1 Package

1 Package

West Pasaman Regency Administration



July 2012-Dec 2012

July 2013-Dec 2014

July 2011-Dec 2014

357.000.000

350.000.000

LS

10 Monitoring and Evaluation Program Implementation

1.

Establishment of Monitoring Team (Internal and

1 Package P2JJ or SNVT of Bengkulu Provincial Road

July 2011-July 2014

July 2011-July 2014

LS LS



External)

Monitoring and evaluative of activity plan implementation by PPL2. Final Evaluation of work performance by External Monitoring Team3.

Recommendation of follow up activity that must be carried out

-Establishment of Internal Monitoring Team by Regent Decree

-Establishment of External Monitoring Team Monitoring Report DocumentLARAP Implementation

Construction

75.000.000 75.000.000.

Total Cost 1.453.800.000

707.000.000 671.800.000

75.000.000

Lubuksikaping, January 2011Pasaman Barat Regent



ANNEX 1: LIST OF ASSETS AFFECTED BY LAND ACQUISITION FOR PADANG SAWAH-SIMPANG EMPAT PROJECT

No. Description Number

ABC

1.

2.

3.

Number of PAPAffected LandAffected Buildings:Entire area >50% BuildingPart ,50%Personally Owned BuildingPermanent buildingSemi-permanent buildingTemporary building/hutOther buildingsPermanent fenceCulvertSemi-permanent terraceTree/plantOil palmCocoaAreca nut

62 WTP2 lots (320 m2)

42 WTP35 WTP

7 WTP42 WTP5 (139m2)11 (133m2)26 (470m2)7 WTP4 (55 m’)2 (18m’)1 (8 m2)12 (WTP)18 trees12 trees5 trees

Appendix 1 aList of WTP which Assets Are Affected by Land Acquisition for Padangsawah Road Widening Project – SimpangempatAs per District Administration AreaNagari District III Pasaman Regency

BuildingNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 134+650 Right Zulkarnaini Stall Building 12 M2 S-Permanent2 134+660 Right Hermansar House Building 16 M2 Permanent3 134+850 Right Rasnadi Workshop Building 21 M2 Hut

Other BuildingNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 135+150 Left Wenardi Other Building, Terrace, 8 M2

PlantsNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 134+950 Right TN Palm Oil 1 tree



Appendix 1bTable of Assets Affected by Land Acquisition for Padangsawah Road Widening Project – SimpangempatAs per District Administration AreaKinali District West Pasaman Regency

BuildingNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 134+740 Right Romi Stall Building 22 M22 137+250 Right Asnita Stall Building 16 M23 141+150 Right Yusmanidar Stall Building 18 M24 142+550 Right Eva Stall Building 24 M25 143+850 Right Jusmaili Stall Building 8 M26 143+950 Right Rita Stall Building 6 M27 145+350 Right Asnita Workshop Building 24 M28 146+250 Right Nasution Workshop Building 12 M29 146+260 Right Sanidar Stall Building 18 M210 146+350 Right Basri DT. Bandaro

BasaStall Building 12 M2

11 146+750 Right Lita Shop Building 10 M212 149+150 Right Evi Stall Building 18 M213 150+050 Right Ena Stall Building 12 M214 154+050 Left Wenardi Stall Building 4 M215 154+150 Left War Stall Building 4 M216 155+450 Left Fredi. S Shop Building 8 M217 156+150 Right Mulyati Stall Building 12 M218 156+650 Left Elly House Building 8 M219 157+250 Right Ida Stall Building 24 M220 157+350 Right Nimar Garage Building 6 M221 158+150 Right Rusidi Stall Building 21 M222 158+250 Right Sari House Building 32 M223 158+550 Left Tika Stall Building 8 M224 158+850 Right Elin Stall Building 24 M225 158+950 Right YEL Stall Building 18 M226 159+450 Right Emi Stall Building 18 M227 160+350 Right Suar Workshop Building 12 M228 160+350 Left Fredi. S Workshop Building 8 M229 160+360 Right Asnimar Garage Building 21 M230 161+150 Right Sumiati Stall Building 21 M231 161+550 Right Emita Stall Building 12 M232 161+950 Right Asni Stall Building 21 M233 162+050 Right Mrliani Stall Building 24 M234 165+050 Right Asnimar Stall Building 27 M2

Other BuildingNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 139+150 Left TN (Kinali smk fence) Other Building, Terrace, 8 M2 2 152+850 Right HJ. Endang Other Building, Culvert 9 M23 152+950 Right Asgul Other Building, Culvert 9 M2

Economic-valued PlantsNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Number1 136+750 Right Baina Oil Palm 4 trees2 136+950 Right Warna Yusnita Oil Palm 1 tree3 137+550 Left TN Oil Palm 2 trees4 140+850 Right Sartini Cocoa Palm 6 treesRoad and Bridge Improvement Project of West Sumatera Province 36


5 143+950 Left Aji Piri Areca nut 5 trees6 152+150 Right Nazzarudin Oil Palm 2 trees7 152+150 Right Yet Oil Palm 2 trees8 152+150 Right Rena Oil Palm 1 tree9 156+550 Right Iren Cocoa Palm 6 trees10 160+550 Right Juliar Oil Palm 2 trees11 160+550 Left ISA Oil Palm 1 tree12 162+100 Right Imel Oil Palm 2 trees

Appendix 1 c

Table of Assets Affected by Land Acquisition for Padangsawah Road Widening Project – SimpangempatAs per District Administration AreaLuhak Nan Duo District West Pasaman Regency

BuildingNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 165+050 Right As Stall Building 27 M2 2 167+450 Left Darwin Stall Building 10 M23 170+250 Right Ida Workshop Building 36 M2

Other BuildingNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 163+850 Left Mutiara Tani

GroupOther Building, Concrete Steel Fence 4 M2

2 170+750 Right Sari Jaminan Other Building, Concrete Fence 11 M3 173+250 Left Jumiati Other Building, Concrete Steel Fence 9 M

Appendix 1d

Table of Assets Affected by Land Acquisition for Padangsawah Road Widening Project – SimpangempatAs per District Administration AreaPasaman District West Pasaman Regency

BuildingNo. Location Position Rsp Name Assets Size1 284+150 Left As House Building 60 M2 2 284+360 Left Darwin House Building 40 M2



Appendix 1eTable of Street Vendor at Kinali Market Affected by Land Acquisition for ProjectMoving to another location offered by the governmentNo. Position Rsp Name Type of Merchandise12345

Within road areaWithin road areaWithin road areaWithin road areaWithin road area

AmriGadurKaraniHendriKodiran

Moving to another location on the vendor’s own choice of location nearby the former placeNo. Position Rsp Name Type of Merchandise12

Within road areaWithin road area

Santi DewiMasri

Table of Street Vendor at Tanpuruang Market Affected by Land Acquisition for the Project

Moving to another location offered by the governmentNo. Position Rsp Name Type of Merchandise12345678

Within road areaWithin road areaWithin road areaWithin road areaWithin road areaWithin road areaWithin road areaWithin road rolen

UpikSusantiSuparnoMuskarnoMasitaMardianaDefriwatiH. Tiar

Moving to another location on the vendor’s own choice of location nearby the former placeNo. Position Rsp Name Type of Merchandise123

Within road areaWithin road areaWithin road rolen

ErniYanYan Hayana



ANNEX 2: SAMPLE FORM OF SOCIALIZATION RESULTS

No Description ExplanationA. Venue of Meeting B Objective of MeetingC Those present from the project (the

proponent) D Community who attended:

• Community leaders who attended• Residents• The number of those present

E Issues that arise (can be any question or whatever)

F Agreed follow-up



ANNEX 3: FLOW CHART OF GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

Grievance redress mechanism of LARAP implementation

Process

Within 12 working days


PAPs

MONITORING

BappedaHead of Satker P2JJ LACMonitoring Team

Investigation conducted by Bappeda & Satker

Consultation with PAPs

Local disclosure

Agreement with PAPs

Implementation

PMU WINRIP

40




ANNEX 4: SAMPLE FORM OF MONTHLY MONITORING OF LARAP IMPLEMENTATION

Regency / City : ………………Sub-project: ……………………Reporting period : …………….Aktivities Work Plan of

LARAP Progress Report 1 Notes

Date Target Progress/ status on field

Issues & follow-up plan

CONSULTATIONCompensation2 Attach : copy of minutes of

agreementIMPLEMENTATION1. Payment for compensation / insurance compensation/severance pay including relocation expenses

Attach :copy of receipt

2. Location and relocation preparatory works for :Number of housesNumber of Kiosks / Stall3.Other activities

1 If the column is not sufficient, please use additional sheet.2 Consultation for compensation has to do with (i) market price, (ii) compensation payment schedule, and (iii) ownership of assets, magnitude and form of compensation
