Top Banner
Applied Growth Transitions www.appliedgrowth .com Leadership Cultural Intercepts implications for operations Salvador Z. Zamudio, MBA
29

Agt planning methodology

Apr 12, 2017

Download

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Agt planning methodology

Applied Growth Transitions

www.appliedgrowth.com

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

implications for operations

Salvador Z. Zamudio, MBA

Page 2: Agt planning methodology

Why Do it?

• Labor ManagementMake the best use of available labor 60%-70% is at stake

• Planning Short Term-Long Term-Strategic Create effectiveness by design• Succession Planning Who is your leadership base Manager-

Supervisor-Team Lead

Page 3: Agt planning methodology

C I P M

Policies Procedures

Structure

Process Improvement

Processes

System

Page 4: Agt planning methodology

C I P M

Integration

Culture

Methodology

Planning

Planning

Page 5: Agt planning methodology

C I P M

Clear Accountability

Clear Consequences

Clear Expectations

Defined Authority

Direction

Page 6: Agt planning methodology

C I P M

Process Improvement

Process Documentation

Evaluation

Pilot Test

Efficiency Gains

Page 7: Agt planning methodology

C I P M Cultural Attitudes Towards Planning

• Planning - mostly short term

• Spontaneous activity - modus operandi

• Time - valued differently

• Pervasive Concept -“It’s good enough”

• Power Distance - huge barriers

• Group - more important than self

Page 8: Agt planning methodology

C I P M Cultural Attitudes towards Planning

• Assuming Responsibility -“Hard to do”

• Saving Face - ”More important than success”

• Strong Affiliation with the “Patron Image”

• Nepotism - “ A Default Management System”

• Questioning authority seems “Not a good thing to do”

Page 9: Agt planning methodology

C I P M Cultural Attitudes towards Planning

• Planning - “is for the Jefes”

• Self initiative - “not a strong suit, without trust”

• Doers - “not planners”

• Fatalistic view of the future -“So why plan ahead?”

• Cultural and language barriers - Critical issues

Page 10: Agt planning methodology
Page 11: Agt planning methodology

Incertitude Stage- New Employee is not sure about new situation. Comparison between the old and the new take place.

Transition Stage- Adaptation Participation, Employee feels he can work with new conditions and looks for opportunities to become involved.

Resentment Stage- Negative event triggers digression to previous stage (Employee may become disgruntled).

Resignation Stage- Employee accepts new conditions and lives with it (Employee falls back on fatalistic outlook).

Integration Stage - (Employee assumes responsibility) Sees value in learning new things, language and other skills)

2

4

5

3

6

Fear Stage - New Employee does not understand world around him/her.

1

Page 12: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 13: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 14: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 15: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 16: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 17: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 18: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 19: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 20: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 21: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 22: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 23: Agt planning methodology

Leadership Cultural Intercepts

Page 24: Agt planning methodology
Page 25: Agt planning methodology

LeadershipSolutions

Page 26: Agt planning methodology

Questions and

Feedback

Page 27: Agt planning methodology

Resources

Page 28: Agt planning methodology

Balogh, A., Gaál, Z., & Szabó, L. (2011). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL

CULTURE AND CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE. Management & Marketing, 6(1), 95-

110. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/859007562?accountid=39364

Dolores Sánchez Bengoa, Hans, R. K., & Vrontis, D. (2012). A new organisational memory for

cross-cultural knowledge management. Cross Cultural Management, 19(3), 336-351.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13527601211247080

Emmerling, R. J., & Boyatzis, R. E. (2012). Emotional and social intelligence competencies:

Cross cultural implications. Cross Cultural Management, 19(1), 4-18.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13527601211195592

Kohnen, J. (2012). Leading with cultural intelligence: The new secret to success. The Quality

Management Journal, 19(3), 70-71. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/docview/1028011021?accountid=39364

Mouton, N., Sine Nørholm Just, & Gabrielsen, J. (2012). Creating organizational

cultures. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(2), 315-331.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09534811211213973

Nongo, E. S., & Ikyanyon, D. N. (2012). The influence of corporate culture on employee

commitment to the organization.International Journal of Business and

Management, 7(22), 21-28. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/docview/1353608739?accountid=39364

Orij, R. (2010). Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder

theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 868-889.

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080162

Page 29: Agt planning methodology

Salvador Z. Zamudio

www.appliedgrowth.com