Agro-ecological Intensification through action research with smallholder farmers in Malawi Regis Chikowo, Sieg Snapp -MSU Wezi Mhango – LUANAR Agronomy Fanny Chigwa –LUANR Animal Science Department Agness Mangwela –LUANAR Nutrition Department Isaac Nyoka–ICRAF Desta Lulseged, Rowland Chirwa – CIAT Owen Kumwenda & Anilly Msukwa – DAES WUR IFPRI Africa RISING ESA Review and Planning Meeting, Arusha, Tanzania, 9-11 September 2014
42
Embed
Agro-ecological intensification through action research with smallholder farmers in Malawi
Presented by Regis Chikowo (MSU), Sieg Snapp (MSU), Wezi Mhango (LUANAR Agronomy), Fanny Chigwa (LUANR Animal Science Department), Agness Mangwela (LUANAR Nutrition Department), Isaac Nyoka (ICRAF), Desta Lulseged (CIAT), Rowland Chirwa (CIAT), Owen Kumwenda and Anilly Msukwa (DAES) at the Africa RISING ESA Review and Planning Meeting, Arusha, Tanzania, 9-11 September 2014
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Agro-ecological Intensification through action research with smallholder farmers in Malawi
Regis Chikowo, Sieg Snapp -MSUWezi Mhango – LUANAR Agronomy
Fanny Chigwa –LUANR Animal Science DepartmentAgness Mangwela –LUANAR Nutrition Department
Isaac Nyoka–ICRAFDesta Lulseged, Rowland Chirwa – CIAT
Owen Kumwenda & Anilly Msukwa – DAESWURIFPRI
Africa RISING ESA Review and Planning Meeting,Arusha, Tanzania, 9-11 September 2014
Background Project strategy Key findings to date
Systems WP Bean WP Livestock WP Nutrition WP
Capacity building
Outline
Background - the project recognizes the importance of application to scale of - action-learning and systems approaches that show
potential Knowledge transfer mechanisms that broadly work
across: o farmer typologies and oagro-ecologies
Challenges...
management recommendations generally at variance with local farmer circumstances (consideration of agricultural risks, resource constraints and farmer production objectives) The levels of labor, fertilizer, manure demanded are often far
beyond the capabilities of all but the wealthiest householdsoWealthy farmers in SSA <10% (Shepherd and Soule, 1998,
Mapfumo and Mtambanegwe, 2005; Tittonell et al., 2005, 2011; Zingore et al, 2007; Kamanga et al. 2009)
Average land holding of 0.5 ha
Fertilizer access is increasing with subsidies- how to improve use efficiency/returns?
Land pressures
Reduced fallows
Deficiencies in soil organic matter (active, total,
other nutrients)
Low crop response to
N
Population pressure
Reduced grazing
land
Alarming yield gaps ??
Crop Actual yields (t/ha)
Attainable yields (t/ha)
Maize 1 4+Soyabean 0.6 1.8+Groundnut 0.5 1.5+
Closing the yield gaps:
Requires knowledge assimilation by farmers through simple pathways
Plausible approaches include learning by doing – farmers empowered through experimentation
Africa RISING Years 1-3• Site selection• Characterization• Partner building• Design of research trials• Implementation• Partner MOUs
The mother and baby approach…
The mother and baby approach as a learning and technologies transfer platform
The philosophy - co-learn with farmers through a basket of technologies on ‘mother’ trials, while concurrently ‘variants’ of elements within these are acceptable at farmers’ ‘baby’ fields
technology based on different crop growth habits/architecture
Different soil nutrient mangement regimes (organic-inorganic nutrient resources, and their combinations
Doubled-up legumes – intercropping 2 legumes that have little inter-specific competition for resources
Bean integration ….
Working with farmers to identify diseases
Climbing beans on a baby trial in Kandeu
Yield response of bush bean varieties under different cropping management options
• Compare varieties: SER 83 and SER 45 with addition of manure in various systems
Livestock feed as a major challenge to dairy intensification...
88 percent of farmers were use grass sourced from wetlands - poor quality
46% of farmers cultivated napier grass and 13% rhodes grass
Only 17 percent of the farmers were using Leucaena species
What are the opportunities for this ?..
Establishing fodder trees around farm boundaries
Graduate student thesis work Pigeonpea-soyabean systems with P fertilization
– Mzumara Nutrition intervention in goat production –
Mkutche Local processing of grain legumes – Soflet Above and belowground biomass additions in
pigeonpea based intercrops –Chiwimbo Soil organic matter and farm management -Erin
Anders
Sustainable intensification: above and belowground biomass additions in pigeonpea based intercrops
Graduate student -thesis work
Root excavations cont…
Belowground biomass: 0-20 cm layer
Food and nutritional security
Africa RISING Nutrition workshops & open days
Soyabean ‘coffee’
Biochemistry with smallholder farmers in Malawi!
Production of soyabean flour for nutritious soya porridge! (mixture of soya, groundnut and maize)
Farmer gives further explanations on the product
… and men also came for ‘cooking lessons’
‘Judgement time’
Outputs/main activities Consolidated action research in project sites
(Linthipe, Golomoti, Kandeu and Nsipe) Ntcheu and Dedza R4D platforms fully functional
(main actors -DAES, DC office, NGOs, farmers) Recently held a writeshop in Mangochi, 27-31 July
– a number of products lined up
Mangochi writeshop meeting, 27-31 July
2014
Dissemination through field days
Outputs/main activities Consolidated action research in project sites
(Linthipe, Golomoti, Kandeu and Nsipe) Ntcheu and Dedza R4D platforms fully functional
(main actors -DAES, DC office, NGOs) Recently held a writeshop in Mangochi, 27-31 July
– a number of products lined up Nutrition workshops held in the action sites We continue to train graduate students
Lessons learnt Appropriate selection of pigeon pea varieties
essential for success in mixed crop-livestock systems – long duration varieties likely to be damaged by goats during July/August
Despite repeated explanations, a good proportion of farmers can not separate R4D activities and Development programs – this leads to ‘excessive’ demands on free inputs – seed, fertilizers, etc.
What worked
Farmers in intervention sites take ownership of the project
Farmer experimenting (and innovating)DAES as convenors of R4D platforms Graduate student training going on well
Plans for Year 4 (and 5)
Africa RISING Years 3-5• “R4D” Platforms• Transfer research outputs• Research refinement & expansion
(e.g., IPM)• Technical support
Year 4 (2014-15)1. Scale-out farmer experimentation with ‘fewer