Agricultural production: plan for a sustainable future with honey bees? Robin Crewe and Robin Moritz Social Insects Research Group Department of Zoology and Entomology
Agricultural production: plan for a sustainable future with
honey bees?
Robin Crewe and Robin MoritzSocial Insects Research Group
Department of Zoology and Entomology
Actually a world without honey bees!
Actually we do know what the world looked like without bees
Origins of Bees
The early Cretaceous era (145-113 mya) when flowering plants and their associated bees emerged for the first time.
Collaboration between evolving flowering plants and early bee species started in the relatively dry regions of Western Gondwana some 120 million years ago
Oldest fossil bee worker –stingless bee
Relationship between Fossil bees and contemporary species
~40 species ->761 species
Vegan ancestral wasp
Oligocene climates- 34 -23 mya
warm temperate
warm temperate
warm temperate
cool temperate
arid
arid
arid
arid
arid
warm temperate
warm temperate
tropical
tropical
tropical
cold
Types of honey bees
Open nest species
Cavity nesting species
Honey bee extinction
Stars indicate fossil worker bees in amber
Recent radiation of populations
12
Colony densities per km2
Jaffe et al. Cons. Biol 2010
Distribution of Apis cerana
Relationship between Fossil bees and contemporary species
~40 species ->761 species
Vegan ancestral wasp
Decline in managed bee colonies?-FAO data
Whole Europe
World
Southern Europe
Moritz and Erler 2016
Honey production
Moritz and Erler 2016
Honey production/colony
Moritz and Erler 2016
What is the FAO data NOT telling us?
• Pollination services do not get measured by national governments-measuring products and not services
• The number of colonies used in providing pollination services is not recorded.
• There is no current method for determining what the pollination service deficit will be in the future.
• Pollination services are a unique national requirement that must be provided locally. Cannot be outsourced!
Provision of Pollination Services
• Essential for productive industrial agriculture
• Dependent on reliable supply of managed colonies
• Dependent on a sustainable source of honey bee colonies
Source of honey bee colonies• Either from wild (African, Europe or middle
east) or feral populations (Americas, Australia)
• Influence of beekeepers – may be colony multipliers (Europe, North America, Australia/New Zealand) and/or colony harvesters (Africa, Central and South America)
• Sustainability is dependent on the management of these two kinds of beekeeping strategies
Responsible colony harvesting for industrial farming & rural development
• Determine the size and fluctuations in the wild population.
• Variation in relation to climate
• Determine safe levels of harvesting in various biomes
• Continuous monitoring of the state of the wild population to adjust harvesting levels.
Estimation of honeybee populations densities
• Effective population size of social insects is determined by colony density or number of reproductively active queens
• Finding and counting colonies is very difficult because they are cryptic –so alternative estimation methods required
• Drone ‘trapping’ through virgin queens and
analysis of their offspring.
• Direct drone trapping with Williams drone traps
Kinds of honey bee colonies
• Wild colonies – unmanaged colonies in an areawhere honey bees are indigenous
• Managed colonies in apiaries –queen breeding • Feral colonies – colonies escaped from apiaries
and living freely
Drone Trapping
43
William’s Trap
South African Biomes
Proposal for a Survey of the South African honey bee populations
• Get a consortium of the three universities undertaking honey bee research and the ARC to plan and undertaken the work
• A number of sampling sites in each of the South African biomes will be identified and samples taken 3 times a year for three successive years.
• The results will provide a rough estimate of the size of the wild honey bee population, its sensitivity to climate variability and its dynamics.
• Will provide for realistic estimates of the potential for both professional and developmental beekeeping at particular sites.
Acknowledgements
Estimation of honeybee colony Densities using drones & workers
Sampling area is almost twice as large using workers than drones. Effect of queen mating flights.
Both methods suitable for estimating colony densities. Drone trapping gives superior precision.
Tswalu experiment – 47.2 colonies from worker sample26.5 colonies from drone sample.5.7 colonies /km2 -drones
Moritz, Dietemann and Crewe, J. Insect Conservation 12:455 -459 (2008).
Temporal variation in colony presence at Ezemvelo
Temporal dynamics studied in a nature reserve unaffected by the influence of beekeeping activities.
80% of drone contributing queens were replaced in successive 8 month periods.
The effect of this high turnover is high genetic diversity, boosting effective population size and hence maintaining genetic diversity.
Jaffe et al. 2009 Molecular Ecology
• Large wild population ≈ 10 million colonies, small proportion ‘managed’ in apiaries
• Two subspecies– Apis mellifera capensis and – Apis mellifera scutellata
• All major honey bee diseases & parasites present– Varroa mites– Viruses– American foulbrood– Capensis problem (social parasites)
South African situation
• Large wild population –unknown size, very small proportion ‘managed’ in apiaries
• Four subspecies– Apis mellifera litorea– Apis mellifera scutellata– Apis mellifera monticola– Apis mellifera yemenitica
• All major honey bee diseases & parasites present– Varroa mites– Viruses– Nosema
Kenyan situation
Kenyan situation
Muli E, Patch H, Frazier M, Frazier J, Torto B, et al. (2014) PLoS ONE 9(4): e94459.
Key behavioural traits of African Honey bees
• Migratory swarms resulting from seasonal abundance of food
• Absconding in response to disease/disturbance • Faster generation times and smaller colonies
Drone ‘trapping’ by queens
Estimation of honeybee colony Densities using Drones
Figure 1 : Sex determination in hymenoptera.Genotypes and sexual fate under the system of complementary sex determination found in many hymenopteranspecies (ants, bees, wasps, sawflies). Males derive from unfertilized eggs and have only one sex determinationallele (marked by different colored bars). Fertilized eggs with two different sex-determining alleles(heterozygous) develop into females. Diploid males arise from fertilized eggs that are homozygous for the samesex-determining allele. These diploid males arise most commonly under inbreeding conditions in which thefather has an allele in common with the mother.© 2009 Nature Education All rights reserved.
http://www.nature.com/scitable/resource?action=showFullIm...
1 of 1 2015/03/12, 10:24 PM
Estimation of honeybee colony Densities in Germany & SA
African populations 12.4 – 17.6 colonies/ km2 analysis of dronesEuropean populations 2.4-3.2 colonies/ km2 analysis of workers
1. Ezemvelo, 2 Leeufontein and 3 SuikerbosrandMortiz et al. J. Insect Conservation 11, 391- 397 (2007)
Temporal variation in colony presence at Evemvelo
Jaffe et al. Molecular Ecology 11: 1511-1522 (2009)
Colony losses in South Afrcia
• Absconding – 52%• Vandalism – 46%• Honey badgers & ants – 30% • Capensis social parasite – 26%• Fire – 28%
Floods & veldfires
VandalismFloods
Veld fires
Removal of forage trees
Conclusions• Beekeepers in South Africa colony losses are largely
not attributable to diseases, pesticides or parasites• Losses are caused by behaviour of the bees and the
actions of beekeepers– Absconding which is not a loss to the population of colonies– capensis social parasite specific to SA
• Losses made up from trapping colonies from wild population of honeybees as opposed to breeding of colonies as in Europe.
Future• More extensive honeybee surveys across SA to
determine colony densities on a finer scale• Long term monitoring of these sites to determine
the effects of – Changes in land utilization – Harvesting of honeybee populations by beekeepers– Effects of diseases – Effects of pesticides
Losses scutellata > capensis
Average percentages of colony losses
2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/20130
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50Scutellata
Capensis
Overall
colo
ny lo
sse
s %
Effect of migrating (2011/2012 – 2012/2013)
Significant for A. m. scutellata and for A. m. capensis – different responses to queen loss.
Scutellata Capensis Overall0
10
20
30
40
50
60Migration Stationary Hobby/SM
Commercial
colo
ny lo
sse
s %
Honeybadgers Monkeys
Kinds of honey bee colonies
• Wild colonies – unmanaged colonies in an areawhere honey bees are indigenous
• Managed colonies in apiaries –queen breeding, management of colonies, pollination
• Feral colonies – colonies escaped from apiaries
and living freely.
Neumann & Carreck 2010
Potts et al 2010
Status: 2010Status: 2010
47
Parasitic Cape honey bee worker in scutellata colony
Primary cause of losses
• Absconding – 52%• Vandalism – 46%• Honey badgers & ants – 30% • Capensis social parasite – 26%• Fire – 28%
49
Distribution of South African subspecies of honeybees
Vaudo et al. J Insect Cons. 2012
scutellata
capensis
50
Origin of Cape worker social parasitism
51
Development of a single family of social parasites
52
Effect on colony survival of beekeeping activites
53
Capensis infestation of Colonies
54
Conflict over Reproduction
55
Conflict over Reproduction
✦ Complete sterility of workers in eusocial colonies is rare
✦ Conflict over reproduction between: Queens & workers Workers for chance to reproduce Workers over rearing of brood✦ Apparent harmony is a consequence of
temporary resolution of conflicts✦ When relationships amongst individuals are
disturbed then strong conflict emerges
56
Capensis worker reproduction
✦ Workers rarely reproduce in presence of own queens
✦ Workers reproduce –lay diploid eggs that produce females – mainly workers
✦ In own colony - leads to laying worker headed colonies
✦ In other colonies: ✦ capensis – self social parasitism ✦ scutellata - social parasitism and
colony loss
• Working Group Monitoring and Diagnosis - investigating colony losses
• Standardised protocol for collecting data - allow for comparisons
COLOSS Network
Monitoring & Diagnosis
Pests & Pathgens
Country Losses
Algeria 13.45Austria 17.2Bosnia and Herzegovina
6.18
Croatia 9.52Denmark 20.91Estonia 25.53Finland 17.02Germany 15.39
Ireland 37.08Israel 5.9Italy (Veneto region) 12.2Latvia 19.65Netherlands 13.71Norway 18.15Poland 18.11Scotland 31.06Slovakia 9.13Sweden 22.62
losses 31% (USA) and 34% (UK)
Honey Bee Colony Losses Winter 2012-13
• “Losses remain greater than beekeepers consider acceptable” (2013 COLOSS press release)
• Explanations remain elusive• Several possible causative factors: both alone and in combination
– pesticides, – poor nutrition, – beekeeping management practices, – pests and diseases,
Global perspective
2011/2012 Questionnaire: Colony losses in South Africa
• Limited knowledge about colony losses• Aim of questionnaires to
• quantify colony losses • identify potential causes and threats• collect comparable data - standardised protocol
Which of the following reasons would you give for your colony losses? How many colonies were lost to this reason?
Yes/ No # ColoniesAbsconding Bad beekeeping Bad weather / lack of forage/ drought Capensis bees Diseases Fire Honey badger / ants Insecticides / poisoning
Pollination stress Small hive beetles Vandalism / theft
Added for country specific situation
Diseases and parasites present
• Varroa• Small hive beetle• Wax moth• European foul brood• American foul brood• Nosema apis• Chalkbrood• Viruses
capensis social parasite
• Remains a major problem in scutellata area– problem can be overcome using good beekeeping
practices
Increasing number of colony losses
Crop effects
Reported losses not significantly different from no losses
0
10
20
30
40
50
YesNoLO
SSES
(%)
Significantly more colony losses on these crops
Apples/Cherries Eucalyptus Onions Sunflowers0
10
20
30
40
50
60
YesNo
LOSS
ES (%
)
• Large wild population -14-18 million managed colonies (small proportion)
• Two subspecies– Apis mellifera capensis– A. m. scutellata
• All major honey bee diseases & parasites present– Varroa mites– American foulbrood– Capensis problem
South African situation
Bad beekeeping practises
Unsafe apiary sites
Perceived causes 2009/2011 2011/2013
• small hive beetle• Varroa • Absconding
(loss to beekeepers not bee population)
• chalkbrood• Capensis social parasite
• Vandalism & Absconding• ants• Bad weather & honey
badger • fire• Capensis social parasite
Colony losses-South African data?
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
FAO data SOUTH AFRICA
Years
Thou
sand
s of
col
onie
s
Trend
• After 20 years still a major problem in Scutellata areas– beekeeping practices to blame– problem in the Cape to a lesser degree?
• Number of colony losses increasing? Catching more infested swarms
Is it wise to consider the wild bee population as an inexhaustible resource for restocking ?
Average colony losses
2009/2010 2010/20110
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
20.6
28.6
Loss
es (%
)
Higher losses with scutellata (29.1%) than capensis (17.9%)
Effect of migrating (combined data)
Migratory beekeepers Stationary beekeepers05
10
1520
25
3035
4035.5
17.2
Loss
es (%
)
Only significant for beekeepers using A. m. scutellata, but not A. m. capensis, in their operations
Effect of migrating (2009/2010 – 2010/2011)
Only significant for A. m. scutellata, not for A. m. capensis
Crop effects
No significant differences between losses
Losses significantly higher on these crops
Wild honeybees can buffer some losses, but they also make an epidemic disease a serious ecological and economical issue if they came to be threatened
• Questionnaire Results will be published in JAR• All participants will be updated
Information on losses:• [email protected] • US http://
beeinformed.org/2013/05/winter-loss-survey-2012-2013
• UK http://www.bbka.org.uk/files/pressreleases/bbka_release_winter_survival_survey_13_june_2013_1371062171
• Questionnaire developed over 3 years• 20 countries part of this group• All questions well thought through
• Global decline in honey bee numbers (managed & feral colonies) – great concern – received attention
• Exceptional colony losses not unusual • Multiple records over 100 years
– early 1900s Isle of Wight 90% of bees lost – 1910 Australia lost 59% of colonies – 1915-1917 USA and Canada– 2002-2003 Sweden, Germany– 2006-2007 USA
• No definite cause, only speculation• An event or part of a cycle of disappearance?• RSA loss to beekeepers not bee population
Fact or fiction?
RESULTS• Biggest problem is the return rate
– 2013 data from 19 European countries• 15000 beekeepers and 280 000 colonies
– USA • 6,287 beekeepers managing 599,610 colonies, (22.9%)
– RSA for both seasons 95 beekeepers and 23 355 colonies (4%)
http://www.southafrica.to/provinces/RSA_by_provinces.jpg
35
5
3
4
3
1
27
4