This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1. Anna Golubovska-Onisimova, UNENGO MAMA-86European
Integration Index presentation Chisinau, 21 November 2012
2. 2001 EaP SCF WG3 Report of 14 expert of 6 EaP countries
Assessed 7 areas: 1) Strenghtening cooperation with EU 2)
Strengthening administrative structures and procedures 3)
Developing strategies, plans and programmes 4) Ensuring
environmental policy integration (promoting SD) 5) Strenghtening
structure and procedures to conduct EIA 6) Improving access to info
and PP 7) Cooperation on SEIS Based on WWF IPO methodology for ENP
Action Plans assessment(2008-2009) Discussed by expert groups and
WG3 during 2 meetings Presented in March 2012 in Kyiv using skype
technology Sent to all EaP countries EU delegations
4. External incentives continue to be the major drive for
reformswhere the EU is the number one. Complimentary informationis
provided by EII. 2011-2012, 8 experts of 6 EaP countries Sector
specific assessment. Questions covered 1) environmental policy
(incl MEAs) 2) sustainable development policy 3) resource
efficiency 4) Climate change 5) pressure to/ state of environment
6) sustainable development and trade Helped to make a link between
policy and state of environment/ resource efficiency Good exercise
to integrate environment and sustainable development into
multitopic CSO research
5. Priorities of ENP SD&environmental objectives Basic
requirements of SD Summits Key prerequisite of obligatory EPI
Eastern Partnership Flagship initiative on good governance (admin.
str., SEIS, MEAs AC, Espoo) Key elements of AA (FTA, SBS in
Environment) The data should be available in each of 6 country
Major environmental performance indicators
6. TOTAL 0,61 0,76 0,53 0,56 0,61 0,53Environmental policy UA
MD BY GE AR AZStrategy and Action plan on National environmental
policy. Is 1,00 0,70 0,50 0,00 0,80 0,10it adopted by the
Parliament/ Government? Yes/ NoEnvironmental policy integration. Is
it demanded by National 1,00 0,70 0,00 0,80 0,90 0,50legislation?
Yes/ NoAction Plan on joining Shared Environmental
InformationSystem (EEA). Is it adopted by the Government? 0,70 0,10
0,50 0,50 0,80 0,00Yes/No/Under preparationWhich regional and
global Environmental Conventions and 0,90 0,80 0,68 0,60 0,70
0,60Protocols your country signed, ratified and
accessed?Established facts of non-compliance with main
conventionsand protocols with compliance mechanismESPOO 0,00 1,00
0,50 n/a 0,00 1,00Aarhus 0,00 1,00 0,00 1,00 0,00 1,00Kyoto
Protocol 0,50 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00MEAs Implementation plans and
Annual Reports Yes/No 0,50 1,00 0,70 0,70 1,00 0,00
7. Moldova is leading on EPI, thus on topic Ukraine recently
adopted new Env Strategy and NEAP as required by Association Agenda
But 3 non-compliance in 2011, one withdrawn Armenia is the only
country ratified SEA Georgia adopted 2nd generation of NEAP MEAs:
Ukraine is leading in number, but behind in reporting and
compliance (active public phenomena)
8. Sustainable development policy UA MD BY GE AR AZHas a
National Strategy of Sustainable Development been 0,00 0,70 0,00
0,00 0,50 0,50adopted and implemented? Yes/No/Under preparationIs
there an institutional mechanism for sustainabledevelopment policy
coordination? Yes/No/Under 0,30 0,70 0,00 0,50 0,70
0,50preparationHas a policy of sustainable consumption and
production(under 10 Year Framework of Programmes) been adopted?
0,50 0,70 0,30 0,30 0,50 0,00Yes/No/Under preparationSD and Trade
UA MD BY GE AR AZMembership in ILO conventions Number 1,00 0,50
0,60 0,20 0,30 0,80Is there an EU-compatible mechanism for
prevention of 0,50 1,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00illegal unreported and
unofficial fishery? Yes/ NoControl of legality of trade in forestry
Yes/ No 1,00 1,00 0,00 1,00 0,50
9. No NSDS, except Armenia (recently ratified programme) NSDC
are not functional (except Armenia), though are established in
majority 10-years SCP policy framework is planned Ukraine ratified
69 ILO Conventions, 60 are in force, Moldova 42 and 40 Only Moldova
adopted law against illegal fishery Control of legal trade in
forestry is a bit better
10. Climate change UA MD BY GE AR AZCompliance with
international commitments in thecontext of the UN Framework
Convention on ClimateChange and Kyoto ProtocolNational Actions Plan
on climate change mitigation: 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0,00
0,00Yes/NoNational Actions Plan on climate change adaptation: 0,00
0,50 0,30 1,00 1,00 0,00Yes/NoAre National Communications being
sent regularly? 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00Yes/No.Was the most
recent sent to FCCC Secretariat in 2009- 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
1,002010?Was it approved by the Convention secretariat? Yes/No 1,00
1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00Development of policy framework: National
frameworkpolicy (Strategy, Doctrine) on Climate change is 0,30 0,10
0,50 0,10 0,00 1,00adopted? Yes/No
11. Resource efficiency, pressure to/ state of 0,32 0,55 0,74
0,59 0,50 0,49 environmentResources efficiency UA MD BY GE AR
AZWater Exploitation Index (water withdrawal as percent of 0,52
0,78 1,00 0,92 0,00 0,01annual long-term water resources) % (EU-27:
13,2) 15,6 8,6 2,8 4,9 29,3 29Waste intensity: generation of
industrial, hazardous 0,00 1,00 0,68 0,92 0,95 ?waste (total per
year), kg/GDP unit (mln USD)Waste intensity: municipal waste (total
per year), kg/per 0,17 0,17 0,50 1,00 0,92 0,00capita 0,54 0,08
1,00 0,00 0,03 0,00Share of municipal waste recycled: in % (EU-27:
22,6) 5-8 1 12 0 0,4 0
12. Pressure to/ state of environment UA MD BY GE AR AZRatio
between GHG emission reduction during last ? 0,90 1,00 0,00 0,21
0,24reporting period and the reduction potentialShare of
non-treated waste waters in annual waste waters 1,00 0,00 0,82 0,70
0,42 0,94discharge % 1,10 43,9Per capita SO2 emissions, kg 0,00
0,93 0,57 0,92 0,81 1,00Per capita, NOx emmissions, kg 0,00 0,69
0,11 0,80 0,89 1,00 0,25 0,00 1,00Share of forest area, % (EU-27:
33%) 0,96 0,00 0,03 17,6 10 41 0,24 0,00 0,88 1,00Share of nature
protected area, % (EU-27: 17%) 0,58 0,46 5,7 4,3 9,5 10,2 0,00 0,82
1,001Eroded soil, share of territory, % (EU-27: 17%) 0,64 0,36 0,55
57,5 26 19,3 1,00 0,51 0,48Pesticides input, kg/ha (EU-27: 3) 0,00
0,99 0,67 0,5-1 2,79 4,9
13. 12 indicators shown: Belarus has the best environmental
situation, followed by Gerogia and Moldova, and Ukraine the worst
The result correlates with Yale University Environmental
Performance Index Total annual volume of municipal waste p. c. is
still lower than in EU-27 (< consumption) Soil erosion is very
high, Ukraine is leading Natural protected areas are too small
14. TOTAL ENVIRONMENT AND UA MD BY GE AR AZ SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT 0,47 0,66 0,64 0,57 0,56 0,51Despite some success in
policy elaboration and internationalcooperation, all EaP countries
lag behind in resource efficiency, andstate of/ impact to
environment (environmental performance).Ukraine as the biggest
country in Europe in territory inherited heavyenvironemntal
consequences from USSR (heavy industry andconventional
agriculture). One of the reason to explain the largestgap among EaP
countries between modern environemntal policyand modest so far
success in its implementation.
15. The latest public administration reforms weaken
administrative structures and procedures (10218) Strategic planning
(and reporting) was improved in advanced AA negotiating countries
(SBS indicators) Environmental policy integration is generally not
backed up with legislation (SEA Pr Armenia) Deregulation leads to
elimination of EIA procedure (fracking) Mechanisms and procedures
for PP are absent SEIS potential for improving the quality of
information for EDM could be used better (env. data collection EaP
Roadmap)