This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
AGENDA BOARD OF GOVERNORS MEETING
Reno, NV April 13, 2016 9:00‐5:00 pm
Lunch with Washoe County Bar ‐ Noon ________________________________________________________________________ Agenda and Call to Order
President’s Report 5 minutes
Discussion Tab 1
Unified Bar Exam, Rick Trachok 30 minutes
Board of Governor Term Limits 30 minutes
Sections 15 minutes
Action Items ‐ Written/Action Tab 2
Personal Injury Specialization Board Appointment 20 minutes
Proposed Changes to Fee Dispute Bylaws 20 minutes
Discipline Report, Stan Hunterton 45 minutes Tab 3
Discipline Update
Executive Session 15 minutes Tab 4
Action Items – Written/Action Tab 5
Financial Report through February 28, 2016 30 minutes
Investment Committee Report 15 minutes
Audit Committee Report 15 minutes
Lawyer Referral & Information Service Grants 20 minutes
Mock Trial Committee Rules of Procedure 20 minutes
New Section Application‐Marijuana Law Section 30 minutes
Probate and Trust Section Position Paper (Supplemental) 20 minutes
ABA Day in Washington 15 minutes
2
Consent Agenda ‐ Written/Action Tab 6
Minutes of January 2016
Resignations Tab 7
Contracts Tab 8 o LaJolla Beach & Tennis (April 2017; September 2017) o July 2016 Bar Exam – UNR< UNLV o Clio o All Covered o Cox Communications
Appointments Tab 9 o Section Appointments o LRIS Committee Appointments o Fee Dispute Arbitration o Advertising Advisory Committee o CLE Appointments
Information Items ‐ Written/No Action Tab 10
Access to Justice Commission Jackrabbit Bar Conference
Clients’ Security Fund 2015 Annual Report Nevada Bar Foundation Annual Report
Publications Update Nevada Lawyer Report Young Lawyers Section Report
Trial Skills Institute Update Executive Committee Highlights
2013‐18 Mission/Strategic Plan
Adjourn
Important Dates: Board Meeting ‐ABA Day in Washington, April 20‐21 ‐Jackrabbit Bar, June 2‐4, Squaw Creek ‐ June 28, 2016, Big Island of Hawaii
1
March 28, 2016
TO: Board of Governors
FROM: Kimberly Farmer
RE: Uniform Bar Exam Discussion
The Board will discuss the current trend in bar examinations ‐‐ the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE).
Nevada Bar Exam The Nevada bar exam consists of:
Seven essay questions prepared by the Board of Bar Examiners. Essay examination subjects include a required question on legal ethics as well as the possible following subjects: Agency and Partnership; Community Property; Conflict of Laws; Constitutional Law; Contracts; Corporations; Criminal Law and Procedure; Evidence; Persons and Domestic Relations; Real Property; Remedies; Torts; Uniform Commercial Code (Articles 2,3 and 9); Wills, Estates and Trusts; as well as pleadings and practices under both the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Both fundamental legal principles and Nevada law are tested and may embrace more than a single subject.
Two 90‐minute Multi State Performance Test (MPT) examination questions requiring the application of fundamental lawyering skills in a realistic situation. Skills tested are factual analysis, legal analysis and reasoning, problem solving, identification and resolution of ethical dilemmas, written communication, and organization and management of legal tasks.
The Multi‐State Bar Examination (MBE). A six‐hour, 200‐question multiple‐choice examination covering Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, Civil Procedure and Torts.
Additionally, an applicant is required to take and pass with a score of 85 or higher the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) within three (3) calendar years before or three (3) calendar years after the examination that an applicant passes (SCR 65.5). This two‐hour, 60‐question multiple‐choice examination is administered three times each year and designed to measure knowledge and understanding of established standards related to a lawyer’s professional conduct.
2
Uniform Bar Exam Many states have adopted the Uniform Bar Exam (PDF of map attached). The UBE is coordinated by the National Conference of Bar Examiners and is composed of the Multistate Essay Examination (MEE)1, two Multistate Performance Test (MPT)2 tasks, and the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE)3. It is uniformly administered, graded, and scored by user jurisdictions and results in a portable score that can be transferred to other UBE jurisdictions.
The UBE is administered over two days, with the MBE given on the last Wednesday of February and July and the MEE and MPT given on the Tuesday prior to that. Jurisdictions that use the UBE may require applicants to also complete a jurisdiction‐specific educational component and/or pass a test on jurisdiction‐specific law in addition to passing the UBE.
2016-AdoptionoftheUBE-withotherNCBEtest
1 The Multistate Essay Examination (MEE) consists of six 30‐minute questions. The purpose of the MEE is to test the examinee’s ability to (1) identify legal issues raised by a hypothetical factual situation; (2) separate material which is relevant from that which is not; (3) present a reasoned analysis of the relevant issues in a clear, concise, and well‐organized composition; and (4) demonstrate an understanding of the fundamental legal principles relevant to the probable solution of the issues raised by the factual situation. The primary distinction between the MEE and the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) is that the MEE requires the examinee to demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively in writing. 2 The Multistate Performance Test (MPT) consists of two 90‐minute items. The MPT is only one of a number of measures that a board of bar examiners may use in determining competence to practice. The MPT is designed to test an examinee’s ability to use fundamental lawyering skills in a realistic situation and complete a task that a beginning lawyer should be able to accomplish. The MPT is not a test of substantive knowledge. Rather, it is designed to evaluate certain fundamental skills lawyers are expected to demonstrate regardless of the area of law in which the skills arise.
3 Multi‐State Bar Examination (MBE). A six‐hour, 200‐question multiple‐choice examination covering Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, Civil Procedure and Torts.
( eff. 7/13)
( eff. 2/13)
Adoption of the Uniform Bar Examinationwith NCBE Tests Administered by Non-UBE Jurisdictions
The Executive Committee reviewed SCR 81 Board of Governors: Election of Members; Terms. The review and discussion was to determine if a rule change is in order to extend terms of Board members who wish to serve as officers of the Bar.
The attached table illustrates the option the Committee considered. This option extends the term limit for a Board member who is elected vice president in his or her 8th year on the Board, thus allowing the individual to serve 10 years on the Board (year 10 is the year this person would serve as president).
T0: Board of Governors FROM: Lori Wolk DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Sections The State Bar now has 26 sections and 1 division. They range from a smaller section with 10 members to the largest sections with 352 members. The activities of the sections are as varied as the practice areas they cover. However, we work to consistently manage the sections, no matter what size or how active. The attached table provides an overview of section activities. A number of issues regarding sections have come up for discussion. They range from financial to administrative and policy matters. It is requested that a Board Taskforce be formed to review section management to determine if changes or added policies are necessary. The issues cover: Administrative fees; carryover balances; use of carryover funds; section advocacy. Should the bar charge administrative fees to sections? The bar provides direct support to the sections through allocation of staff, about one-half of a FTE position. Some of following activities are:
Point of contact and internal advocate for sections
Performing administrative tasks such as processing expenses; review of policies and bylaws; section management
Providing marketing and communications support such as updating individual web pages, quarterly newsletters, announcements, support to social events
Budget and monthly reconciliations. Preparing and distributing monthly P&Ls The models for similar state bar programs range from no fees; per section member fees (ranges from $6 to $18 per member); flat fee program; fee based on a percent of section revenue; or a fee for each service. Should the policy of unlimited section carryover balances be continued? Some sections show large carryover balances. This may be the result of successful section programs or in some cases no activity by the section (thus no funds spent). In the past six months we have encouraged the sections to draw down their carryovers. A number of sections have taken heed and an active role to spend down their carryover. Should a policy be put in place that encourages section use of carryover funds and approved guidelines for use of carrover funds? Section Advocacy The Board has a policy and process for sections taking legislative positions and one for submission of amicus briefs. While not explicitly stated, it is implied that the policy covers use of section funds for political activities. We should review the section policies to ensure they are explicit in terms of what activities a section can and cannot participate in.
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
1
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Administrative Law
Note: Governs the
activities of
administrative agencies
of government.
Paola Armeni 75
$20,475
$25 Chair: Richard Galin
Vice Chair: Richard Galin
Secretary: Stephanie Allen
Treasurer: Andrew Platt
12/2016 CLE seminar/luncheons in May,
August and October
3-4 CLE seminars/luncheons
Consultations with the Boyd
School of Law about holding a
luncheon or other gathering for
second- or third-year students
to join with administrative law
practitioners and to hear
directly from them about the
nature, scope and challenges of
this practice area
Survey section members to learn
about their particular practice
areas within the administrative
law field and their suggestions
for topics or speakers at future
CLE programs
ADR
Note: Educates
members in all forms of
alternative methods of
dispute resolution
including arbitration,
mediation, short jury
trials and other means to
avoid the expense of
litigation
Troy Isaacson 62
$29,739
$25 Chair: Patrick Chapin
Vice Chair: Bill Hammer
Secretary: Barbara Johnston
Budget Officer: Bill Turner
8/2016 Section meetings in February,
June, July, September and
November
CLE seminars in May and
November
Purchase of Short Trial Clocks
Section meeting in January
CLE seminar in November
Animal Law
Note: The purpose of
the Section is to bring
awareness to the
community of legal
issues relating to
animals in Nevada
Richard Pocker 30
$3,155
$25 Chair: Kathy McCarthy
Vice Chair: Melissa Roose
Secretary: Jill Davis
Treasurer: Jennifer Braster
5/2016 Annual membership meeting in
May
Annual membership meeting in
May
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
2
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Appellate Litigation
Note: Focuses on the
practice of appellate
advocacy in state and
federal courts
Richard
Dreitzer
95
$5,843
$25 Chair: Seth Floyd
Vice Chair: Joel Henriod
Secretary: Jordan Smith
Treasurer: Anjali Webster
9/2016 CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting and In December
Quarterly membership meetings
Meet and greets with the new
Court of Appeals judges
Formed a committee to explore
creation of an Appellate
specialty
Completed revision of Appellate
Practice Manual
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
Developing a comprehensive
writing workshop
Quarterly membership meetings
Continue to work on proposed
updates for next edition of
Appellate Practice Manual
Bankruptcy Law
Note: Focuses on the
practice of bankruptcy
law in Nevada
Ryan Works 139
$19,265
$25
Chair: Ogonna Atamoh
Vice Chair: Scott Fleming
Secretary: James Leavitt
Treasurer: Robert Charles
2/2016
Bankruptcy Bar mixer
Sponsorship for ABI conference
Joint sponsorship of event for
Judge Riegle retirement party
with SNABA
Contribution to Legal Aid in
honor of Judge Riegle
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
Holiday mixers in December
Not yet determined
Business Law
Note: Focuses on
Nevada’s business law
statutes
Ryan Russell 275
$75,658
$25 Chair: Robert Kim
Vice Chair: Albert Kovacs
Treasurer: Richard Barrier
5/2017 ABA Business Bar Leader
Meeting in May 2015
2015 Legislature (February to
June 2015) including
Meetings of the Executive
Committee, Testimony before
the Senate Judiciary Committee
and Testimony before the
Assembly Judiciary Committee
Amicus Brief filed December 3,
2015
Elections (TBD)
Northern Nevada Social/Mixer
Event in January/February
2016
Southern Nevada Social/Mixer
Event January/February 2016
2017 Legislature (February –
August 2016) including
Meetings of the Executive
Committee
ABA Business Bar Leader
Meeting in May 2016
CLE seminar on Fiduciary
Duties for Nevada Entities
(TBD)
ACC-UNLV Business Clinic in
October 2016
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
3
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Construction Law
Note: Covers legal
issues and disputes
arising from building
and improvements of all
sizes and complexity
Paul Matteoni 153
$16,201
$30 Chair: Casey Quinn
Vice Chair: Carolyn Renner
Secretary: Eva Segerblom
Treasurer: Michael Wadley
12/2016 2 General membership meetings
Monthly board meetings
Bi-monthly legislative update
meetings
CLE in November
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
Angel Tree Holiday charity
event
2 General membership meetings
Monthly board meetings
2 CLE seminars
Angel Tree Holiday charity
event
Elder Law
Note: Enhances the
delivery of legal
services to the elder
community by
encouraging mutual
interaction among Elder
Law Attorneys aimed at
professional growth and
development
Kari Stephens 78
$10,857
$25 Chair: Keith Tierney
Vice Chair: Homa Woodrum
Secretary/Treasurer:
Nancy Sollinger
12/2016 Monthly telephonic section
meetings
CLE seminar in December
Monthly telephone section
meetings
CLEs
Work to expand membership
Energy, Utilities &
Communication Law
Note: Enhances the
practice of energy,
utilities and
communication law
Gene Leverty 73
$7,879
$25 Chair: Don Lomoljo
Vice Chair: Curt Ledford
Secretary: Craig Newby
Treasurer: Debrea Terwilliger
7/2016 Annual membership meeting in
July
CLE seminar in the spring
Annual membership meeting in
July
Entertainment Law
Note: Focuses on laws
applicable to filmed,
recorded or live
entertainment
Paul Matteoni 18
$3,089
$30 Chair: Matthew Pruitt
Vice Chair: Howard Siegel
Secretary: David Kahn
Treasurer: Russell Christian
12/2016 CLE seminars in February,
April, May
6 Executive Committee
meetings
Pro bono Ask a Lawyer for the
Arts program
6 Executive Committee
meetings
CLE seminars
Pro bono community events
Environmental &
Natural Resources
Note: Enhances the
practice of all aspects of
environmental law
Kimberly
Buchanan
73
$13,360
$25 Co-Chairs: Linda Bullen,
Therese Ure
Co-Secretary: John Zimmerman
Co-Secretary: Ross de Lipkau
Treasurer: David Hornbeck
12/2016 Lifetime achievement award
Quarterly section meetings
Election of officers at December
meeting
Lifetime achievement award
Quarterly section meetings
with CLE components when
possible
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
4
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Family Law
Note: The Section seeks
to further the knowledge
of the members of the
Section, the Bar and the
Judiciary in all aspects
of Family Law
Julie
Cavanaugh-
Bill
334
$95,800
$35 Chair: Jessica Anderson
Vice Chair: Shelly Cooley
Secretary: Amber Robinson
Treasurer: Sarah Hardy-Cooper
3/2017 Annual Family Law Conference
in Ely on March 4-6
Specialization exam on
February 28
CLE seminar at Annual
Meeting
Worked on legislative proposals
4 Executive Council Meetings
NFLR newsletters
Sponsored Justice Breakfast at
SBN annual meeting
Raffle donation for Pro Bono
Project
Filed an amicus curiae brief
Annual Family Law
Conference in Ely on March
3-4
Specialization exam on
February 27
NFLR newsletters
Sponsorship at SBN annual
meeting
Gaming Law
Note: Enhances the role
and skills of lawyers
engaged in the practice of
gaming law
Ryan Works 166
$92,849
$25 Chair: Jeff Rodefer
Vice Chair: P. Gregory
Giordano
5/2018 7 hour CLE – 2015 Bank
Secrecy Act in June
Gaming Law conference in
November
Annual publication of Nevada
Gaming Lawyer magazine in
September
Pro Bono Employee
Registration Program in
conjunction with legal service
providers
GLS scholarship at UNLV Law
School
4 Executive Committee
meetings
2016 Banks Secrecy Act
Conference
Annual publication of Nevada
Gaming Lawyer magazine in
September
Gaming Law conference in
November
Publication of Nevada
Gaming Law Practice &
Procedure Manual
4 Executive Committee
meetings
Insurance & Health
Note: The section is
dedicated to recognizing
and discussing means of
improving the law and
practice of law in
insurance and healthcare
through programs,
forums and other
activities to educate
members of the bar
Ann Morgan 73
$14,329
$25 Chair: Pat Leverty
Vice Chair: Tim Mulliner
Secretary: Susan O’Brien
Treasurer: William Ginn
6/2016 Participated in Health Care
Reform CLE in March
Section members drafted
chapters for Guide to
Affordable Care Act in Nevada
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
Wrote Nevada Lawyer articles
for Insurance Law issue
Publication of Affordable
Care Act Manual
CLE seminars on ACA
manual, medical referral
issues, insurance law update
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
5
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Intellectual Property
Note: Focuses on
improving practice in the
following areas:
trademark, copyright,
patent, technology, sports
and entertainment
Troy Isaacson 101
$35,794
$25 Chair: Joanna Myers
Vice Chair: Lindsey Williams
Secretary: Stephanie Buntin
Treasurer: Juan Rodriguez
11/2016 Bi-monthly section meetings
(Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Sept, Nov)
CLE seminar and annual section
meeting in Nov.
Bi-monthly section meetings
(Jan, Mar, May, Jul, Sept,
Nov)
CLE seminar and annual
section meeting in Nov.
International Law
Focuses on making
international laws
accessible through the
creation of a network of
international law
resources
Eric
Dobberstein
20
New section,
no balance
carried
forward
$25 Chair: Wilbur Roadhouse
Vice Chair (North): Richard
Trachok II
Vice Chair (South): Michael
Buckley
Secretary: Peter Ashman
Treasurer: Theodore Williams
8/2016 The Chair visited the Bar
Associations of Shanghai and
Suzhou, as well as the Seoul
Bar Association, to explore
possible future networking
The Executive Committee
commenced planning future
activities for the ILS
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
Coordination with other
external bar associations to
establish networking
opportunities
Focus on increasing
membership
Labor & Employment
Note: Focuses on laws
governing
labor/management-
employer/employee
relationships as it affects
both employers and
employees
Ann Morgan 162
$6,660
$30
Chair: James Kemp
Chair Elect: Deanna Brinkerhoff
Secretary: Kristina Gilmore
Treasurer: Peter Navarro
6/2016 Published first edition of
Nevada Practitioners’ Journal
of Labor and Employment Law
in February
Published newsletters in May
and November
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
CLE seminar in October
General annual meeting in
October
3 Executive Committee
meetings
CLE seminars
Social mixers
Newsletters
General annual meeting in
October
3 Executive Committee
meetings
LGBT
Note: Focuses on issues
of importance to the
LGBT client and
community
Paola Armeni 35
$10,969
$25 Chair: James Davis
Vice Chair: Kimberly Surratt
Secretary: Peter Goatz
Treasurer: Peter Cleary
11/2017 CLE seminars in January and
December
Hosted the LGBT Bar
Association Family Law
Institutes Regional Conference
in January
Social in January
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
Quarterly section meetings
Worked on legislative proposals
2 CLE seminars
2 socials
Quarterly section meetings
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
6
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Litigation
Note: The goals of the
Section are to review and
work to improve laws
and procedure in the
areas of criminal and
civil law and to offer
publications and quality
CLE programming
Richard
Pocker
307
$35,196
$30 Chair: Tracy DiFillipo
Vice Chair: Justin Jones
Secretary: David Carroll
Treasurer:
9/2016 Medical Marijuana CLE/Mixer
with the Solo Section
Summary Judgment CLE at
State Bar Annual
Lunch Box CLE on Short Trials
Lunch Box CLE Bankruptcy for
Litigators
General Membership meeting
electing officers and executive
committee members, and
presentation from the Court of
Appeals
Continue CLE lunchbox
series
Create a one-day CLE
program on Short Trials to
be used in conjunction with
the Short Trial Volunteer
Program
CLE program with the
Appellate Section
Proposal for CLE seminar at
SBN Annual Meeting
Sponsor two attendees for
Trial Academy Annual
Meeting
CLE mixer
Meet your Candidates mixer
General membership meeting
with elections and speakers
Paralegal Division Bryan Scott 23 $65 Chair: Conni Hebert 1/2018 Board meetings Pro bono activities
Board meetings
Probate & Trust
Note: Focuses on review
and development of
probate and trust law and
the law relating to estate
planning
Ryan Russell 224
$60,954
$25 Chair: Elizabeth Brickfield
Vice Chair: Michelle Rafferty
Secretary: Dana Dwiggins
Treasurer: Julia Gold
9/2017 Quarterly section meetings
Continue developing a
certification program
Continue working on a chapter
of Nevada Civil Practice
Manual
Proposal for CLE seminar at
annual meeting
Worked on and passed
substantial legislation
Quarterly section meetings
Quarterly Bench Bar meetings
with Judge Sturman
Public Lawyers
Note: Focuses on duties
and responsibilities of
members of the legal
profession practicing in
the public sector
Kimberly
Buchanan
228
$7,323
$25 Chair: Brett Kandt
Vice Chair: Tina Russom
Secretary: Sarah Bradley
5/2016 Co-sponsor Nevada Gov’t Civil
Attorneys Conference with the
State of Nevada Advisory
Council for Prosecuting
Attorneys on May 1-3 (115
attendees)
Quarterly newsletter
Annual section meeting
Co-sponsor Nevada Gov’t
Civil Attorneys Conference
with the State of Nevada
Advisory Council for
Prosecuting Attorneys in
May
Quarterly newsletter
Annual section meeting
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
7
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Real Property
Note: Serves as a
resource for expert
analysis of legislative
proposals and regulations
affecting real property
Eric
Dobberstein
209
$19,195
$25 Chair: Michael Buckley
Vice Chair: Karen Dennison
Secretary: Matt Watson
Treasurer: DeArmond Sharp
8/2016 Monthly Executive Committee
meetings
CLE seminar at SBN annual
meeting
CLE seminar in December
Legislative update webinar
Legislative activities including
formal and informal meetings
regarding legislative proposals
previously approved
Monthly Executive
Committee meetings
Work with legislators and
LCB to pursue enactment of
section’s legislative
proposals
Annual membership meeting
in January
CLE seminar and mixer
Working on a list of areas for
proposed new legislation
Creation of an award
honoring significant
contributions in this practice
area
Solo & Small Practice
Note: Provides
networking and support
for solo and small firm
practitioners in areas
unique to those
individuals, specifically
in marketing, technology
and office management
Ryan Russell 76
$9,662
$25 Chair: Edmund Joe Gorman
Vice Chair: Laura Stubberud
Secretary: Jenni Hubach
11/2016 Annual membership meeting in
September
Quarterly mixers in North and
South
Joint CLE seminar with
Litigation section in February
CLE seminars in March and at
SBN annual meeting
Co-sponsored Autumn Inspire
mixer with YLS
Provide articles for Nevada
Lawyer magazine
4 CLE seminars and 2 brown
bag lunches
Proposal for CLE seminar at
SBN annual meeting
Create a resource book and
member directory
Survey section members
Tax Law
Note: The Section aims
to further the knowledge
of its members in the law
of federal, state and local
taxation
Richard
Dreitzer
78
$14,809
$20 Chair: Krisanne Cunningham
Vice Chair: Andrew Glendon
Secretary: Jared Johnson
Treasurer: Andrea Nichols
12/2016
None Executive Committee
Meetings in January and
April
CLE seminar in February
Social events in February in
the Las Vegas and Reno
Tribal Law
Note: The section focuses
on the exchange of
information among
members of the Section,
the bar, the tribal courts
and other interested
entities
Julie
Cavanaugh-
Bill
New section,
no balance
carried
forward
$30 Chair: AnnaMarie Johnson
Vice Chair: Scott Souers
Secretary: Victoria Oldenburg
Treasurer: Dawn Gearhart
4/2016 Monthly Executive Committee
meetings
Recruitment efforts to increase
membership
Quarterly Executive
Committee Meetings
2 CLE seminars
Continued recruitment efforts
Sections of the State Bar of Nevada
4/6/2016
8
Section 2015-2016
BOG Liaison
# of
Members/
Balance
Carried
Forward
Dues Officers Term
Expires
2015 Activities 2016 Scheduled Activities
Young Lawyers
Note: YLS membership
is open to all attorneys
who have been admitted
in Nevada for less than
five years, or are 36 years
old or younger
Kari Stephens 352
No balance
carried
forward
$25 Chair: Layke Martin
Chair Elect: Jeffrey Conner
Secretary: Jordan Davis
Budget Director:
Dylan Ciciliano
7/2016 CLE seminar in April
Trial Academy at SBN annual
meeting
Serving Seniors events in April
Project Salute in May
Social events in May, July and
November
Poster and essay contest in June
Ask a Lawyer event in Moapa
Valley in September to assist
flood victims
Goldilocks presentations
Quarterly newsletter
Co-sponsored Autumn Inspire
mixer with Solo and Small
Practice section
CLE seminar in January
Serving Seniors event
Trial Academy at the SBN
annual meeting
Socials
1
T0: Board of Governors FROM: Lori Wolk DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Board of Personal Injury Specialization On April 29, 2015, the Board of Governors named four attorneys to the Board of Personal Injury Specialization with staggered terms of one, two or three years. Jay Kenyon served a one year term and has reapplied to serve a second term. Additionally, applications were received from: Daniel O’Brien Clark Seegmiller All three applicants are members in good standing residing in Nevada. As a reminder, the members of the Board of Personal Injury Specialization are responsible for the administration of the program for certification of Personal Injury Specialization; establish standards concerning education, experience and other relevant matters for certification; approve or deny applicants for certification; provide procedures for the investigation of applicants' qualifications; establish and enforce standards of professional conduct for personal injury specialized lawyers; and test and establish grading criteria. The Personal Injury Specialization taskforce reviewed the applications and recommend that Jay Kenyon be reappointed to the Board of Personal Injury Specialization for a two year term ending April 2018.
Application Type
I am an attorney applicant
Name
Jay Kenyon
Bar Number
6,376
Date Admitted to State Bar of Nevada
10/01/1997
If Admitted to Other Jurisdictions, Please List State and Year of Admission
State Bar of California: 9/1/1999
Name of Committee appointments you seek
Board of Personal Injury Legal Specialization
Employer
Yan Kenyon
Employer Address
7881 W Charleston Blvd, Suite 165 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Map It
Have you ever had a finding of discipline - public or private - in this or any other jurisdiction?
No
List any State Bar sections of which you are a member
None
List Pro Bono activities including organizations and pro bono hours
Current Member of Board of Personal Injury Legal Specialization
Fields in which you practice
personal injury, collections,
Please provide a brief statement indicating why you wish to serve on this committee and what you can contribute
I have enjoyed my experience sitting on the board and developing the exam for the 2014/2015 applicants. I would like to continue to serve and believe my experience in personal injury did and will continue to contribute to the board.
ADMITTED TO PRACTICE • State Bar of Nevada, October, 1997. Bar No. 6376. • State Bar of California, September, 1999. Bar No. 202499.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Owner, Yan Kenyon, Las Vegas, Nevada. 2010 to present. Practice consists primarily of all aspects of claims and civil litigation with emphasis on personal injury. Range of practice includes premises liability, motor vehicle accidents, wrongful death, burn injuries, brain and spinal cord injuries, injuries to children, products liability, assaults, and animal attacks. • Attorney, Henness & Haight, Las Vegas, Nevada. 2004 to 2010. Practice consisted exclusively of plaintiff’s personal injury claims and litigation. • Attorney, Wingert, Grebing, Brubaker & Goodwin, Las Vegas, Nevada . 1997 to 2004. Practice included all aspects of civil litigation, including personal injury defense, commercial collections, construction defect, contract disputes, and injunctive relief.
TRIAL / LITIGATION EXPERIENCE • I have conducted several jury and non-jury trials involving personal injury cases. All of my trials have involved premises liability cases and car accidents, both as Plaintiff and Defense counsel. In addition, I have prevailed on several cases via motion practice, including dog bites, slip and falls, negligent security, and car accidents.
EDUCATION • University of Iowa College of Law, J.D., May, 1997, with Distinction. • University of Kansas, B.A., December, 1993, Phi Beta Kappa, with majors in Political Science and Communication Studies.
REPORTED CASES • AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 245 P.3d 1190, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. 53 (2010).
PUBLISHED ARTICLES • U.S. v. Smith: Making ERISA Pension Benefits Judgment Proof, 81 Iowa L. Rev. 461 (1997). • The Interest of the State in Supplying Children with Condoms in Schools, 2 LegalBrief L.J. 4 (1998).
SEMINAR PRESENTER • Insurance Fundamentals for Personal Injury Practice (co-presenter) — April, 2012. • Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Litigation from A to Z (co-presenter) — April, 2013.
HONORS / RECOGNITION • Martindale Hubbell AV Preeminent rated • Nevada Business Magazine’s Legal Elite, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 • Nevada Super Lawyer / Mountain States Super Lawyer, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014
PROFESSIONAL AND CIVIL ACTIVITIES • Member of Temple Sinai Board of Trustees (2014 to present) • Member of State Bar of Nevada Board of Personal Injury Legal Specialization (2015 to present)
INTERESTS • Nebraska Football, reading, skiing, biking, independent film, coffee, and The Beatles.
Have you ever had a finding of discipline - public or private - in this or any other jurisdiction?
No
List any State Bar sections of which you are a member
Public Lawyers
List Pro Bono activities including organizations and pro bono hours
I judge moot court, mock trial, appellate advocacy and attorney-client competitions at the High School and Collegiate levels. I also speak every year at one or more schools concerning careers in Law. On the average, I spend between 20 and 30 hours a year in such activities.
Fields in which you practice
Litigation, personal injury defense, public school law, government law, administrative law, and appellate practice. I am also an arbitrator with the Court-Annexed Mandatory Arbitration program and arbitrate anywhere from six to twelve arbitrations every year.
Please provide a brief statement indicating why you wish to serve on this committee and what you can contribute
I have over 32 years of experience in personal injury law, both as a Plaintiffs' attorney and as a Defense attorney. Unfortunately, a significant number of professionals in this area lack fundamental skills necessary to properly represent their clients in arbitrations or in court. I would like to lend my experience in assuring that those individuals certified as personal injury specialists are qualified to competently represent their clients and to conduct themselves to their clients' best advantage in court.
Discipline Confidentiality Waiver
Yes
Conflict of Interest
Yes
I request an advisory opinion to or a waiver from the Conflict of Interest Policy
No
Resume or Biography
DAN-Resume.wpd
Hobbies / Interests
Coin collecting, woodworking, jewelry making, playing with my grandkids.
Have you ever had a finding of discipline - public or private - in this or any other jurisdiction?
No
List any State Bar sections of which you are a member
My current Stat Bar sections have expired. Past member of the ethics committee. Past member of the advertising committee . My time constraints have freed significantly in the last six months now that I finished my masters program. And I would like to get back into service.
List Pro Bono activities including organizations and pro bono hours
Pro bono work on my State Bar paperwork which is unavailable to me now. I can supplement in later but I wanted to meet the deadline.
Fields in which you practice
Medical malpractice Wrongful death Personal injury
To: Board of Governors From: Lisa Dreitzer, Deputy Executive Director Date: March 25, 2016 Re: Fee Dispute Arbitration Committee Rules of Procedure Amendments
At the January Board of Governors meeting, the Fee Dispute Committee submitted proposed amendments to its bylaws. The suggested changes addressed issues such as the complexity of fee disputes being filed with the Committee and the balance between the voluntary nature of the program and service to the public. While generally supportive of the amendments, the Board of Governors elected to form a taskforce to more thoroughly discuss the issues. Taskforce members included: Paola Armeni, Gene Leverty, and Paul Matteoni, as well as Fee Dispute State Chair Peter Angulo and Regional Chair Dan Waite. The Taskforce identified the following issues for the Board’s discussion. A copy of the Fee Dispute Rules of Procedure is attached. The Fee Dispute Taskforce recommends the Board of Governors consider the following topics at its meeting and adopt the remaining amendments as proposed. Bylaw III: Jurisdiction; Section A. Setting a cap for the amount in dispute. There is a minimum amount in controversy that may be addressed through the fee dispute program ($250); there is no upward claim limit. The Committee often convenes arbitration panels to hear these claims; however, claims in excess of $50,000 tend to be complex and taxing on the panel’s time. Frequently, these claims are filed by law firms seeking the free assistance of the Fee Dispute Committee, rather than employing other ADR providers.
Year Total Claims $50K and over $100k and over
2014 168 17 (10%) 8 (5%)
2015 165 7 (4%) 3 (2%)
2016 (as 3/21/16) 39 4 (10%) 2 (5%)
The recommendation from the Fee Dispute Committee is to limit its jurisdiction to the same arbitration cap described in Nevada Arbitration Rule 3(A). As the statutory cap is adjusted, the Fee Dispute Committee will follow the same limitations. Bylaw IV: Section B(2): Binding arbitration for attorneys subject to three or more disputes in two years. The Fee Dispute bylaws have historically required attorneys who have repeatedly been the subject of fee disputes to participate in the program. In 2011, this section was amended to state that failure to participate could result in a referral to the Office of Bar Counsel. The intent was to give more teeth to this mandatory participation provision; however, it did not make the process consequential by obligating the attorney to binding arbitration.
The recommendation of the Fee Dispute Committee is to make arbitration automatically binding for those attorneys who have been the subject of three or more fee disputes in two years. Bylaw V: Section D(2): Voluntary Mediation Process – Participation in Good Faith. Similar to mandatory settlement conferences, the parties to fee dispute mediation are expected to act in good faith. The absence of participation by the attorney subject to a fee dispute undermines the program and provides little resolution to clients who have agreed to be held by the terms of the binding arbitration agreement.
Year Total Claims Binding Arbitration
Response Only No Response Settled or Withdrew Prior
2014 168 99 (59%) 43 (26%) 15 (9%) 11 (6%)
2015 165 91 (55%) 31 (19%) 25 (15%) 18 (11%)
2016 (as 3/21/16) 39 4 (10%) 1 (3%) 0 1 (3%)
The recommendation of the Fee Dispute Committee is to mandate participation in mediation in good faith. Participation in good faith is defined in Section V(C) and leaves discretion to the mediator to determine whether there is bad faith. Although participation in the process is mandatory, there is no mandated result. Furthermore, if the attorney elects to not sign a binding arbitration agreement, this may be the only opportunity for the client to be heard; absent binding arbitration, the matter will not proceed to arbitration if mediation is not successful. Bylaw V and VI: Referral to the Office of Bar Counsel for Failure to Participate in Good Faith. More than half of the attorneys who participate in the fee dispute process do so under a binding arbitration agreement and of those attorneys – and those who choose to provide a non-binding response – the vast majority of attorneys participate in good faith. However, for those who do not, the dispute resolution process lacks meaning to the public and often leaves a bad impression of the profession as a whole. Absent making the fee disputes mandatorily binding on all participants, the remaining mechanism to encourage participation is a referral to the Office of Bar Counsel. The recommendation of the Fee Dispute Committee is to refer those attorneys who fail to participate in good faith to the Office of Bar Counsel. Amendments to the Disciplinary Rules of Procedure: Section I. Scope of Rules In order to provide clarity regarding the authority by the disciplinary panels to take action, the Fee Dispute Committee further proposes the following expansion to the Disciplinary Rules of Procedure: I. Scope of Rules
Rule 1. The Disciplinary Rules of Procedure (DRP).
(a) Scope. These rules govern procedures before the Northern and Southern Nevada Disciplinary Boards pursuant to SCR 99-123, involving prosecution and adjudication of attorney misconduct and incapacity. These rules also govern the Rules of Procedure of the State Bar of Nevada Fee Dispute Arbitration Committee, established pursuant to SCR 86(12). Nothing in these rules shall be construed to limit or alter the inherent and exclusive authority of the Supreme Court in the regulation and discipline of attorneys.
BY-LAWS FOR THE FEE STATE BAR OF NEVADA DISPUTE ARBITRATION COMMITTEE STATE BAR OF NEVADARULES OF PROCEDURE
Amended: August 22, 2012,April __ 2016
I. DEFINITIONS:
As used in these By-Laws, unless the context requires otherwise:
A. “Arbitration” means the resolution of a fee dispute outside the courts where the parties agree to be bound by the decision of an arbitrator or arbitration panel.
B. “Decision” means the determination made by a single arbitrator or arbitration panel.
C. “Mediation” means a process by which the petitioner and respondent work with a mediator and use consensus and agreement to resolve the fee dispute.
D. “Participation” means that the attorney respondent must provide a written narrative and supporting documentation regarding the fees in dispute. Upon request from the fee dispute arbitrator or chair of an arbitration panel, the attorney respondent must also be present for the arbitration to respond to any questions posed by the arbitrator or arbitration panel.
E. “Party” means an attorney or client. who has executed consent to binding arbitration. An attorney or client who has failed to consent to binding arbitration shall not be deemed a party, shall not be entitled to notice of the hearing and shall not be entitled to participate in the hearing. However, the arbitrator(s), at his or her discretion, may allow such participation to facilitate resolution of the dispute.
F. “Petitioner” means the party requesting fee arbitration.
G. “Respondent” means the party with whom the petitioner has a fee dispute.
II. COMMITTEE COMPOSITION:
A. The Board of Governors of the State Bar of Nevada (“the Board”) established a Fee Dispute Arbitration Committee (“Committee”) pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 85 and 86.
B. The Committee consists of a State Chair and six (6) Regional Panel Chairs: three (3) in Las Vegas, one (1) in Reno, one (1) in Carson City and (1) Rural Panel Chair. The State Chair, with the consent of the Board, may create additional Regional Panel Chairs. The size and makeup of each regional panel shall be determined by the Board so that an adequate number of attorney and lay members (“Members” or “arbitrator(s)”) shall comprise each regional panel. The Board may enlarge or reduce the size of regional panels as the need appears. Each Member shall be appointed by the Board for a three (3) year term. Regional Panel members shall be appointed the Board annually, as shall the State Chair. Members’ terms shall be staggered so that approximately one-third (1/3) of the terms shall expire each year. If a Member’s term expires while arbitration is pending before that Member, the term shall be extended to allow completion of those proceedings.
Page 2 of 9
C. The State Chair and the Regional Panel Chair for each of the regional panels, or any substitute for said Regional Panel Chairs as the State Chair might designate, shall constitute the Executive Council of the Committee. The Executive Council shall be charged with the responsibilities of overseeing the work of the Committee and the regional panels and developing forms to implement the arbitration/mediation process.
III. JURISDICTION: A. The Committee has jurisdiction over any disagreement between a client and an attorney
concerning the fee and/or costs (“fee”) paid, charged or claimed for legal services rendered by an attorney subject to discipline in this state, or practicing in this state pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42.
B. A claim must be filed within six years after the attorney/client relationship has ended or otherwise limited under N.R.S. §11.190. This time limitation may be waived with the consent of the Respondent.
C. The Committee does not have jurisdiction over the following matters:
1. Disputes over which, in the first instance, a Court has jurisdiction to determine the fee and has chosen to exercise its jurisdiction by means of Complaint and/or motion;Disputes regarding which a complaint and/or motion to determine the fee has been previously filed with a court of competent jurisdiction - unless the issue of fees is requested by that court to be handled by the Fee Dispute Committee.;
2. Claims for affirmative relief against the attorney for damages or otherwise based upon alleged malpractice or professional misconduct;
3. Any claim for less than Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00); and 3.4. .Any claim for more than the mandatory arbitration limit identified in Nevada Arbitration
Rule 3(d).
D. The arbitration of any fee dispute shall in no way preclude a Disciplinary Board from investigating the conduct of the attorney involved for potential violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility, or from conducting any hearing or hearings in connection with any alleged violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
IV. FILING AND RESPONDING TO A FEE DISPUTE: A. Petitioners requesting arbitration must complete the Petitioner’s Agreement for Arbitration of
Fee Dispute (“Petition”) and submit a copy to the State Bar of Nevada’s Las Vegas office. The Petition must be signed and shall include copies of any supporting documentation upon the filing of the Petition. Failure to sign the Petition or provide supporting documentation may result in denial of the request for arbitration.
B. The Petition and supporting documentation shall be provided to the Respondent within a reasonable period of time, in addition to a copy of these By-Laws. The Respondent will be provided twenty-five (25) days to respond in writing with any supporting documentation. The Respondent will also be asked to sign a binding arbitration agreement. The response and binding arbitration agreement shall be delivered to the State Bar of Nevada’s Las Vegas Office. The Respondent may request an additional twenty-four (24) day extension to file a response, for a total of forty-nine (49) days.
Page 3 of 9
1. If the Respondent is an attorney and fails or refuses to sign the binding arbitration agreement, the arbitration will proceed ex parte. In this instance, any Respondent attorney participation during the fee dispute process is at the discretion of the arbitrator.the matter will be placed into mandatory mediation. There will be no arbitration of the claim. The failure of any party to participate in good faith will result in a detailed report by the mediator indicating that the party has failed to appear before the mediator or to mediate in good faith. The mediator's report is admissible in any subsequent action. However, statements or admissions made by a party in the course of a mediation are not admissible.
2. If the Respondent is an attorney and if during two (2) years prior to the filing of the Petition by the Petitioner, the Respondent attorney has been the subject of three (3) or more fee disputes within the jurisdiction of the Committee, then participation in the fee dispute arbitration proceeding shall become mandatory,be a mandatorily binding arbitration and failure to participate may result in referral to the Office of Bar Counsel for investigation into ethical violations.
C. Upon expiration of the response period, or upon receipt of the response, the State Bar shall provide the Petitioner with copies of the Respondent’s binding arbitration agreement and response, if any. If no binding arbitration agreement is received, the State Bar shall offer the Petitioner the opportunity to withdraw the fee dispute or proceed ex parte. The State Bar shall inform the Petitioner that no collections assistance will be available in the event the Petitioner proceeds ex parte and the Decision is in the Petitioner’s favor.Upon receipt of the response, the State Bar shall provide the Petitioner with copies of the Respondent's binding arbitration agreement and response. If no binding arbitration agreement is received, the State Bar will inform Petitioner and Respondent that the matter will proceed to mandatory mediation.
V. MANDATORY MEDIATION: A. All disputes for $5,000 or less are subject to mandatory mediation before a mediator selected by
the State Bar and/or Regional Chair.In the event the responding party to a filed fee dispute does not consent or is not contractually obligated to submit the matter to binding arbitration, the matter will be subjected to mandatory mediation before a mediator selected by the State Bar and/or Regional Chair.
B. With good cause, parties to the fee dispute may petition the Regional Chair, by filing a request with the State Bar’s Las Vegas Office, to resolve the matter directly to arbitration. The Respondent attorney must sign a binding arbitration agreement prior to making this request.In the absence of a binding arbitration agreement, the outcome of the mediation will be the end of the Fee Dispute Committee’s involvement in the matter. No arbitration will occur for matters which are the subject of mandatory mediation.
C. When the Petitioner and Respondent voluntarily agree or are required to participate in
mediation, they must participate in good faith. In advance of the mediation, the selected
mediator will send correspondence to Petitioner and Respondent indicating how the mediation
will proceed and the obligation of the parties to be prepared to meaningfully conduct a
mediation session. While not an exhaustive list, the failure to communicate with the mediator,
the failure to attend and complete the mediation session, the failure to be prepared to present
justification for the party’s position and/or to act in some other way so as to intentionally thwart
the authority of the mediator and hamper the fee dispute process will constitute grounds for a
determination of bad faith participation. The mediator is empowered to write a report
Page 4 of 9
indicating a particular party failed to appear before the mediator or to mediate in good faith.
That report should detail, with as much specificity as possible, each of the acts which the
mediator believed constituted a failure to act in good faith. That report will be admissible in any
subsequent action involving the Petitioner and Respondent.
D. Any statements or admissions made by a party in the course of mediation are not admissible in a subsequent action or arbitration of the matter.
E. The failure of an attorney to participate in good faith in a mandatory mediation may result in a referral to the Office of Bar Counsel.
VI. VOLUNTARY MEDIATION PROCESS: A. All parties have the right to request mediation as a primary means of fee dispute resolution.
with the option of arbitration if mediation is unsuccessful . Thereafter, if mediation is unsuccessful and if both parties have signed a binding arbitration agreement prior to making the request, the dispute will be arbitrated in accordance with Section VII.
B. Upon receipt of the response, the State Bar shall convey the complete fee dispute file to a mediator.
C. The mediator shall, within fourteen (14) days, provide notice of the mediation. The date and location of the mediation is at the discretion of the mediator. The mediation shall be conducted within thirty (30) days; however, the mediator may grant a continuance for good cause. Non-compliance with this timeframe shall not be construed to be cause to invalidate the mediation.
D. The mediator shall notify the State Bar the outcome of the mediation.
1. If the mediation is successful, the State Bar will inform the parties that the matter is closed. The State Bar will also provide the Petitioner the opportunity to re-open the fee dispute in the event the Respondent does not comply with the mediation agreement.
2. If the voluntary mediation is unsuccessful, the Petitioner may request the fee dispute be resolved through arbitration. If one of the parties has not acted in good faith, a report similar to that described in Section V(C) will be prepared.
VII. ARBITRATION:
A. The Regional Chair will forward fee disputes in excess of $5,000 in which mediation was not selected as an option, or those fee disputes in which mediation was unsuccessful, for arbitration within 14 days of receipt.
B. Fee disputes of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or less will be assigned to a single member of the Fee Dispute Committee. Fee disputes in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) will be assigned to a three (3)-member arbitration panel. 1. Arbitrators shall be selected on a rotational basis. 2. An arbitration panel may consist of up to two (2) Lay Members and a Lay Member may serve
as an arbitration panel chair. 3. Lay Members may not serve as sole arbitrators.
Page 5 of 9
C. No arbitration hearing panel hearing shall be conducted by or proceed with two (2) arbitrators without written consent of all parties.
D. Once an arbitrator has been assigned, a party who submits additional or supporting documents to the arbitrator(s) shall serve a copy upon the other party, by mail or personal delivery, and shall so advise the arbitrator(s) and the State Bar’s Las Vegas office.
E. The burden of proof shall be on the attorney to prove the reasonableness of the fee by a preponderance of the evidence utilizing the standard set forth in Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5.
F. The parties to arbitration are entitled to attend all hearings, to be heard, to present evidence and to cross-examine witnesses appearing at the hearing. Parties to the arbitration may also:
1. Be represented by an attorney at the hearing or at any stage of the arbitration proceedings. 2. Have the hearing reported by a certified court reporter at such party’s expense by written
request presented to the arbitrator(s) at least three (3) days prior to the date of hearing. The party retaining the reporter shall provide one copy of the transcript to the arbitrator. Any other party, at his or her own expense, may obtain a copy of the transcript by making arrangements directly with the reporter.
3. Waive oral hearings and may submit their contentions in writing, together with exhibits, for consideration of the controversy on the basis of such documents. The arbitrator(s) may nevertheless require oral testimony of any party or witness, after due notice to all parties. Otherwise, when oral hearing has been waived by the parties, section VIII shall not apply.
G. In the event that an arbitrator cannot ethically or conscientiously serve, or declines or is unable to serve, the Regional Panel Chair, or if unavailable the State Chair, shall select another Committee Member. The Regional Panel Chair may appoint a new three (3)-Member arbitration panel (“arbitration panel”), if in the Regional Chair’s opinion such appointment is necessary to complete the arbitration in a fair and expeditious manner.
H. The Members of the Committee selected as arbitrator(s) of any dispute shall be vested with all the powers and shall assume all the duties granted and imposed upon neutral arbitrators by Chapter 38 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.
VIII. ARBITRATION PROCESS:
A. The single arbitrator or chair of the arbitration panel shall provide notice to the parties, other arbitrators and any counsel appearing, for an arbitration hearing (if possible) not less than twenty (20) days and no more than ninety (90) days in the future. The arbitrator or arbitration panel chair may grant a continuance for good cause.
B. The single arbitrator or chair of the arbitration panel shall preside at the hearing; shall rule on the admission and exclusion of evidence and on questions of procedure; and shall exercise all powers relating to the conduct of the hearing. 1. The single arbitrator or chair of the arbitration panel may, at his or her discretion:
Page 6 of 9
a. Request opening statements and may prescribe the order of proof. In any event, all parties shall be afforded full and equal opportunity for the presentation of any material evidence.
b. Exclude persons or witnesses, other than the parties to the controversy, waiting to be heard.
c. When necessary for the convenience of the parties, hold the hearing by telephonic conference in which the parties are able to hear each other, the arbiters and the witnesses.
d. Employ a certified court reporter, with the permission of the Regional Chair. e. Issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and for the production of books,
records, documents and other evidence in accordance with NRS 38.233. f. Determine the controversy upon the evidence produced and enter an award, or dismiss
a claim entirely, in the event that a party who has been duly notified fails to appear at the hearing, absent a properly executed Waiver of Appearance.
g. Postpone a hearing date upon the request of a party to the arbitration with good cause. h. Select a continuation date for a hearing that cannot be completed on the first day. The
time and place will be selected with due regard to the circumstances of all the parties and counsel and the desirability of a speedy determination.
i. Reopen the hearing on his or her own motion or on application of a party for good cause at any time before the award is signed and submitted to the Regional Chair.
2. The single arbitrator or chair of the arbitration panel shall:
a. Administer oaths to witnesses testifying at the hearing. b. Specifically inquire of all parties whether they have further evidence to submit in
whatever form before the close of the hearing. If the answer is negative, the hearing or submission shall be declared closed and a notation to that effect made by the arbitrator(s) as well as the date for submission of memoranda or briefs, if requested by the arbitrator(s).
c. Render an award in writing within thirty (30) days after the close of hearing or after the submission (where hearing has been waived).
C. The parties to fee dispute arbitration may not tape record and/or videotape the arbitration proceedings.
D. In the event of the death or incompetency of a party to the arbitration proceeding, prior to the close of the hearing or submission, the proceeding shall be abated without prejudice to either party to proceed in a court of proper jurisdiction to seek such relief as may be warranted. In the event of death or incompetency of a party after the close of the hearing or submission, but prior to a decision, the decision rendered shall be, to the extent agreed, binding upon the heirs, administrators or executors of the deceased and on the estate or guardian of the incompetent.
Page 7 of 9
IX. MEDIATOR/ARBITRATOR CHALLENGE: A party may, within ten (10) days after notice of the mediation or arbitration, challenge the mediator or arbitrator without stating reason or cause. The challenge shall be made to the Regional Chair, through the State Bar’s Las Vegas Office. No party shall be allowed more than one such challenge. A mediator or arbitrator may also be challenged by any party upon showing of actual bias, which challenge shall be decided by the Regional Chair, in his or her sole discretion. When a mediator or arbitrator is disqualified by a challenge, a successor mediator or arbitrator shall be immediately reappointed.
X. THE AWARD: A. The award of the arbitration shall be made by the single arbitrator, or if an arbitration panel, by
a majority of the arbitration panel. The Decision shall be in writing and signed by the single arbitrator or if an arbitration panel, by each panel member. If there is dissent within the arbitration panel, the Decision shall be signed separately, but the award shall be binding if signed by a majority of the panel.
B. While it is not required that the award be in any particular formThe issued award should substantially follow a standardized form attached as Form No. ___ to these By-Laws. , Iit should in general consist of a preliminary statement reciting the jurisdictional facts (i.e., that the hearing was held upon notice pursuant to a written agreement to arbitrate, that the parties were given an opportunity to testify and to cross-examine, etc.), a brief statement of the dispute, the findings and the award. The award shall include a determination of all the questions submitted to the arbitrator(s), the decision of which is necessary in order to determine the controversy and a determination of participation by the Attorney Respondent (if required).
C. Unless the submission or contract provides otherwise, the arbitrator(s) may grant any remedy or relief deemed proper, including a direction for specific performance. The arbitrator(s) may include in the award a direction for payment of other expenses related to the proceedings but not for fees to the arbitrator(s) or counsel. An award may also be entered on consent of all parties.
D. Once the award is signed and submitted, the hearing may not be reopened. However, the single arbitrator or arbitration panel may, at their discretion, or at the discretion of the State Chair, reconsider and amend an award to correct a misapplication of law or fact.
E. The arbitrator or chair of the arbitration panel shall forward the award to the State Bar who shall thereupon serve a signed copy of the award to each party to the arbitration. The award shall include a cover letter informing the parties of the appeal timeframe. Prior to closing the matter, the State Bar shall also provide the Regional Chair with a copy of the award and provide the Regional Chair three days in which to return the matter for arbitration to correct any procedural errors.
XI. TIMEFRAMES:
A. Non-Compliance with any of the above-referenced time limitations shall not be cause to invalidate an otherwise valid award.
B. The State Bar may reassign the fee dispute controversy to another mediator or arbitrator in the event that the timeframes for completion of the matter have been substantially exceeded.
Page 8 of 9
XII. ENFORCEMENT OF AWARD:
A. If the award determines that the attorney who consented to binding arbitration is not entitled
to any portion of the disputed fee, or if the client makes payment of the amount fixed in the award, then the service of the award or the payment of the fixed amount shall:
1. Terminate all claim and interest of the attorney against the client or clients in respect to the subject matter of the arbitration;
2. Terminate all rights of such attorney to retain possession of any documents, records or other properties of such client or clients pertaining to the subject matter of the arbitration then held under claim of attorney’s lien or for other reasons;
3. Terminate all rights of such attorney to oppose the substitution of one or more other attorneys designated by such client or clients in any pending litigation pertaining to the subject matter of the arbitration.
B. In any case in which both the Petitioner and the Respondent signed consent to binding arbitration, any award rendered may be enforced by any court of competent jurisdiction.
C. Upon the written request of the client to the State Bar when both the client and the Respondent Attorney have signed binding arbitration agreements, the Regional Chair may ask a Committee member to institute suit on behalf of the client:
1. For the refund of any portion of the paid fee found to be excessive. 2. For the defense of any suit by the attorney seeking to collect any unpaid portion that was
determined to be excessive. 3. To vacate any lien asserted by the attorney upon any property of the client for an unpaid fee
charged, but determined to be excessive.
D. Committee Members are under no obligation to initiate suit on behalf of the client and the State Bar shall notify the client if no Committee Member volunteers to perform this service.
E. In any lawsuit by or against the client in which the client is represented by an appointed Member, no fee shall be charged for the appointed Member’s services. Upon application to the Executive Director and approval by the Board, an attorney may be compensated by the State Bar for such representation. The client is responsible for the payment of all court costs incurred in connection with any said lawsuit and this responsibility for costs must be explained to the client by the appointed Member before going forward with litigation.
Page 9 of 9
XIII. APPEALS: A. A party to the fee dispute may not file an appeal on the merits of the arbitration decision. A
party may file appeal to the Executive Council only if the party contends that:
1. An arbitrator hearing the fee dispute failed to be disqualified in accordance with the standards set forth in section VIII of these By-Laws.
2. The Committee failed substantially and materially to comply with the procedural requirements of the By-Laws; or
3. There was actual fraud on the part of any arbitrator(s).
B. The party making an appeal shall file a Notice of Appeal to the State Bar’s Las Vegas Office within thirty-three (33) days after service of copy of the written arbitration award sent to the last known address provided to the Committee. The Notice of Appeal must:
1. Specifically include a signed statement of the grounds for appeal relied upon and an affidavit or signed statement setting forth the factual basis therefore.
2. State whether the Committee proceedings were reported. 3. Be served upon the other party.
C. The filing of a Notice of Appeal from an arbitration determination shall act as a stay of execution of any award obtained as a result of the fee arbitration process. That stay shall not be lifted until final conclusion of the fee dispute arbitration proceedings.
D. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Notice of Appeal, the State Chair shall review it for compliance with the above requirements. The State Chair shall dismiss an appeal that does not meet the requirements set forth in paragraphs A (1-3) and B (1) of this section.
E. If the Notice of Appeal and signed statement or supporting affidavit complies with the above requirements, the Executive Council shall, within forty-five (45) days, decide the issues raised by the appeal and may, at its discretion, hold a hearing (telephonically or in person) for that purpose, at which any interested party may participate. If it finds that sufficient grounds exist, the Executive Council shall remand the fee dispute for a new or supplemental arbitration hearing, or determine the matter itself if it deems such action appropriate. The Executive Council’s decision shall be written and becomes final upon service on the parties by first class mail.
F. Supreme Court Rules, specifically 86 (12), apply to all proceedings after the decision has been finalized by the Committee.
XIV. CONFIDENTIALITY/IMMUNITY:
A. With the exception of the award itself, all records, documents, files, proceedings and hearings pertaining to arbitration of any fee dispute under these rules in which both Petitioner and Respondent have consented to be bound by the result, shall be confidential. This does not apply to any party to the dispute who has executed a binding arbitration agreement or if otherwise ordered by the Board or the Supreme Court or the District Court, and unless requested by the participating attorney involved. All records, documents, files, proceedings and hearings may be disclosed to the State Bar Discipline Committee.
B. Parties and witnesses shall have such immunity from suit as is applicable in a civil action in the jurisdiction. Members of the Committee, including mediators, arbitrators, arbitration panels and staff shall be immune from suit for any conduct in the course and scope of their official duties.
1
Office of Bar Counsel
Memorandum
To: Board of Governors
cc: Kimberly Farmer, Executive Director
From: Office of Bar Counsel
Date: March 30, 2016
Re: 1st Quarter 2016 Office of Bar Counsel Report
The Office of Bar Counsel submits the following 1Q 2016 report.
I. DISCIPLINE STATISTICS
• In Q1, the OBC conducted 17 hearings on 93 Grievances, all matters were over six months old.
A. MATTERS FROM THE BACKLOG OF CASES
In November, 2015 we identified 26 pending cases that were the worst in terms of “aging”. As of March, 2016 20 of the 26 have been closed or processed through formal hearing and are awaiting review by the Supreme Court. Three other cases have been set for Formal Hearing. The remaining 3 cases involve 2 lawyers currently incarcerated and 1 who has stopped practicing law. These cases should be resolved in Q2.
B. PENDING MATTERS IN THE OFFICE OF BAR COUNSEL
• INTAKE: The OBC currently has 95 grievances pending in intake.
• INVESTIGATION: The OBC has 230 grievances pending investigation, 127 of those are over six months old.
• PENDING SCREENING: The OBC has 80 grievances on 36 Respondents in the prosecution phase. These matters have been investigated and assigned to Assistant Bar Counsels to screen for Letter of Caution or Formal Hearing.
• PENDING HEARING: The OBC has 58 matters (Respondents) on 143 grievances in the prosecution phase. Of the 58 matters, 56 are over six months old. These matters have been screened and are pending Formal Hearing or Conditional Guilty Plea.
2
II. RECONSIDERATION POLICY
It has long been the practice to reconsider a grievance which has been denied if the grievant requests a “recon”. As of 1/1/16, there were 66 of these “recons” pending, some literally for years. Stephanie and Kait (Assistant Bar Counsel), were assigned to work with Stan to clear the backlog and they did. We also have a new system in place to clear “recons” or assign them for follow-up within four weeks.
III. SUPREME COURT ORDERS
Eighteen Orders from the Supreme Court were received in the first quarter of 2016, details are as follows:
• 11 Orders approving the CGPs’ (Conditional Guilty Pleas); • 1 Order approving Reciprocal Discipline; • 1 Order of Disbarment; • 1 Order of Temporary Suspension and Referral to the SBN; • 1 Order declining to impose Temporary Suspension; • 1 Order Denying Reinstatement; • 1 Order Transferring Attorney to Disability Inactive status; • 1 Order of Suspension.
IV. STAFFING
Deputy Bar Counsel Brian Kunzi recently left the Office of Bar Counsel to become the Director of Admissions. Bar Counsel Stan Hunterton is replacing the Deputy Bar Counsel position with an Assistant Bar Counsel position at this time. Stan will handle administrative issues that were assigned to Brian. This will give us the resources to conduct more hearings.
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
LEGEND TO MASTER CASE LIST
Remanded from Supreme Court to Re-Try Supreme Court ReferralJudicial Referral Criminal Conviction/111 PetitionHearings Held on Remand Cases/Up at the Supreme Court for Approval.
Common TermsCGP = Conditional Guilty PleaHPL = Half Price Lawyer ICC = Initial Case ConferenceRecon = Reconsideration, done when a Grievant asks to be reconsidered when dismissed by Intake Counsel
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
Korrey, David 08-143-2072 4 1/1/08 NA NA JRD/TB (BK)
10/2/15 NA 4/26/16 Transferred from Brian to Jason to conduct hearing.
REMAND: CGP Rejected by Supreme Court; Panel Chair Requested 12/15/15.
Dvorak, Brian 08-135-0851 1 8/8/08 8/8/08 N/A SB NA 8/14/12 Transferred from Brian to Stephanie to conduct hearing.
Continued Hearing for completion of criminal trial
Errico, William 010-0625 8 9/29/10 10/12/10 10/12/10 JVI/WJ 10/12/10 4/24/12 4/14/16 Safekeeping Property; Bar matters, Misconduct
011-0893 11 6/27/11 6/30/11 NA JRD/TB 6/30/11 12/16/14 4/22/16 re-opened to have 2nd hearing with additional criminal matter.
Michaelides, Thomas
012-0019 4 1/8/12 1/8/12 N/A JVI/WJ 1/8/12 NA 3/28/16 Diligence, Communication, Expediting Litigation, lack of supervision of staff and failure to adequately communicate with the State Bar.
Remanded from SC; ICC Held 1/25/16, attempt to resolve in 30 days
Berliner, Kenji 012-1103 1 7/10/12 7/12/12 NA DR/TB 7/12/12 Fees, Conflict of interest, misconduct
Pending Screening
Myers, Michael 012-1337 2 8/28/12 9/4/12 5/6/15 JRD/WJ 7/27/15 11/3/15 Diligence; Communication; Safekeeping Property; Misconduct; Responsibilities re NonLawyer Assistants
Pending Answer, JRD ext. given to 2/19/16.
1
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
14
15
16
17
18
19
Mann, David 012-1920 12 12/13/12 12/13/12 JVI/TB Diligence, Communication, Safekeeping Property, Improper Fees, Unauthorized Practice of Law and Misconduct
In Investigation Stage, pending forensic accounting
Dvorak, Brian 013-0130 1 1/31/13 1/31/13 SB Transferred from Brian to Stephanie to conduct hearing.
Hong, Joseph 013-0443 3 3/27/13 3/28/13 JRD 3/28/13 11/20/14 8/25/15 Continuation date to be set; Diligence, Communication, Safekeeping property, Bar matters, misconduct, conflict of interest
Def Counsel requested a bank reconciliation, Investigator Sent 12/15/15.
Holper, Scott 012-1441 8 4/8/13 4/8/13 5/11/15 DR/WJ 5/26/15 6/9/15 5/11/16 Competence, Diligence, Communication, Misconduct, Confidentiality of Information, Conflict of Interest, Safekeeping Property, Meritorious Claims & Contentions, Candor Toward the Tribunal, Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants, Bar Admission & Disciplinary Matters
Pending Hearing
Phillips, David 013-0554 4 4/17/13 4/17/13 4/9/15 DR/TB 7/15/15 8/25/15 Competence, Diligence, Communication, Safekeeping Property, Candor Toward the Tribunal, Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel, Bar Admission & Disciplinary Matters, Misconduct.
Pending Motion to Dismiss filed by Phillips. J. Posin to make determination
2
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Truitt, Glenn 013-1035 13 8/13/13 8/19/13 7/31/15 DR/WJ 8/10/15 11/17/15 Diligence; Communication; Fees; Declining or Term. Representation; Responsibilities of Partners, Managers and Supervisory Lawyers; Misconduct
Aquino, A. Alfred 013-1681 3 11/22/13 11/26/13 JRD/TB 7/9/15 11/17/15 5/27/16 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawyer; Communication; Declining or Terminating Representation; Misconduct
CR14-0087 1 1/21/14 NA NA BK/WJ 10/9/15 NA Criminal Conviction Pending Hearing
Leventhal, Todd 014-0127 1 1/29/14 5/17/12 NA JVI/TB 1/29/14 4/14/15 6/21/16 Fees, Conflict of interest, misconduct
Hearing Continued to June 21&22, 2016
Stuart, James 014-0239 6 2/24/14 2/24/14 11/18/15 JRD/TB 11/18/18 1/5/16 Misconduct; Diligence; Communication; Competence; Scope of Representation; Declining or Terminating Representation
Pending Answer
Terry, Paul 014-0236 1 2/28/14 3/21/14 Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules; Meritorious Claims and Contentions; Misconduct
Investigation
Yen, Aaron 014-0344 1 2/28/14 3/21/14 Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules; Meritorious Claims and Contentions; Misconduct
Kutner, Adam 014-0337 1 3/12/14 3/14/14 2/17/16 DR 2/17/16 Diligence; Communication; Fees; Safekeeping property; Misconduct
Pending Screening
Bybee, Melissa 014-0343 1 3/17/14 3/23/14 Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules; Meritorious Claims and Contentions; MisconductGinapp, Gabriel 014-0351 1 3/17/14 9/17/14 7/10/15 DR/TB 9/25/15 10/27/15 Conflict of interest; Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters; Misconduct; Diligence;
Pending ICC
4
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Itts, Tracey 014-0415 1 3/28/14 4/16/14 1/11/16 SB Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters; Misconduct; Diligence; Communication; Declining or Terminating Representation
Investigation: S. Barker assigned, Respondent wants to go out on Disability Inactive
Kutner, Adam 014-0418 1 3/28/14 6/1/15 DR/TB 10/12/15 12/8/15 Competence; Responsibilities Regarding NonLawyer Assistants; Unauthorized Practice of Law; Misconduct
Pollock, Charles 014-0571 1 4/29/14 4/26/14 4/29/15 DR/TB 10/5/15 NA Misconduct (Criminal Acts) Joint Disbarment petition sent to Pollock in prison 12/1/15, no response; Complaint drafted, have contacted AUSA Dan Schiess & e-mailed attorney at BOP to discuss service of complaint/R's appearance at hearing.
Kennedy, Fred 014-0576 1 4/30/14 Safekeeping Property
5
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Scroggins, Benjamin
014-0592 1 4/30/14 5/13/14 10/19/15 JVI/WJ 10/21/15 11/3/15 4/29/16 Diligence; Communication; Fees; Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters
Pending Hearing
Koch, Jan 014-0609 1 5/7/14 12/15/14 SB/DM Diligence; Fees; Communication; Safekeeping property; Declining and terminating representation; Misconduct
Pending bank record review.
Frizzell, Kenneth 014-0667 1 5/23/14 5/30/14 Declining or Terminating Representation; Professional Independence of a Lawyer; Misconduct
Hafter, Jacob 014-0715 2 6/4/14 6/19/14 9/7/15 JVI/WJ 10/12/15 Candor Toward Tribunal; Impartiality and decorum of the tribunal and relations with jury; Trial publicity; Responsibilities and nonlawyer assistants; Misconduct
Pending Screening
Harker, Michael 014-0798 3 6/20/14 1/6/15 8/7/15 JRD/WJ 8/10/15 10/27/15 Diligence; Fees; Responsibilities Regarding NonLawyer Assistants; Unauthorized Practice of Law; Declining or Terminating Representation; Communication;
Pending Hearing
Hawkins, Richard 014-0834 1 6/27/14 7/20/15 1/20/16 DR/WJ 2/20/16 Scope of representation; Diligence; Communication
Stubbs, Stephen 015-0241 2 2/18/15 2/18/15 NA BK/DM 2/18/15 SCR 111 monitoring; Criminal Conviction
SC Declined to impose temp suspension; Pending further investigation, then screening Huang, Kelly 015-0284 1 2/18/15 7/20/15 Responsibilities Regarding Non
Lawyer Assistance; MisconductReferral from the National Insurance Crime Bureau – employee from Huang’s office is potentially involved in accident staging/capping – Huang’s involvement has not been determined. NICB sent report to AG office for further investigation – we are waiting for them to finish investigation
10
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111112
113
114
Romanelli, Marilyn
015-0294 1 2/27/15 7/20/15 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawyer; Diligence; Communication; Fees; Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants; Berliner, Kenji 015-0299 1 2/27/15 7/20/15 7/20/15 DR/TB 7/20/15 Competence, Diligence, Fees, Conflict of Interest
Pending Screening
Bettinger, Robert 015-0288 1 3/2/15 3/2/15 DR Safekeeping Property, Misconduct
Kutner, Adam 015-0309 1 3/4/15 3/18/15 Competence; Diligence; Communication; Fees; Safekeeping property; Responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants; Unauthorized practice of law; Misconduct
015-0323 1 3/10/15 8/5/15 Communication; Fees; Declining or Terminating Representation
Rosenfeld, Efrem 015-0320 1 3/13/15 3/18/15 Diligence; Communication; Fees; Safekeeping Property; Expediting Litigation; Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel; Misconduct
11
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
115
116117
118
119
120
121
122
123124
125
126
127
128
129
130
Vohwinkel, Rory 015-0361 1 3/13/15 5/7/15 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawyer; Diligence; Smith, Leonard 015-0375 1 3/16/15 5/20/15 Diligence; Communication; Expediting Litigation
Holper, Scott 015-0383 1 3/23/15 12/11/15 Advertising
Levings, William 015-0403 1 3/24/15 9/4/15 12/22/15 SB 2/8/16 Diligence; Fees; Declining or terminating representation
Smith, Ulrich 015-0657 1 5/15/15 8/30/15 Fees; Confidentiality of Information; Conflict of Interest; Candor toward the tribunal
Terry, Michael 015-0667 1 5/26/15 7/20/15 NA DR/TB 11/16/15 3/8/16 Confidentiality of Information; Misconduct
Pending Screening; Related to K. Berliner (Screening 3/8/16)
Carrasco, Sarah 015-0682 1 5/27/15 8/5/15 12/7/15 JD/LP 12/7/15 12/15/15 Diligence; Communication; Safekeeping property; Terminating Representation; Bar Matters; Misconduct
Pending Answer; Transferred from KF to JD due to conflict
13
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
142
143
144
145146
147
148
149
150
151152
Fronczek, Thomas 015-0692 1 5/27/15 9/28/15 Safekeeping Property; Responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants; Aiding in unauthorized practice of law
Kutner, Adam 015-0721 1 5/28/15 7/20/15 DR Diligence; Communication; Responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants; UPL
In Investigation
Treffinger, Timothy
015-0697 1 6/1/15 11/18/15 SB Misconduct Investigation Pending, Ast. Bar Counsel assigned to assist Inv. LW drafting 111 petition
Smith, Kurt 015-0725 1 6/4/15 6/19/15 8/19/15 DR/TB 8/27/15 10/27/15 4/1/16 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal and Relations to the Jury; Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters; Misconduct
Randazza, Marc 015-0747 1 6/5/15 7/20/15 NA DR/WJ 9/3/15 Fees, Conflict of Interest, Candor Toward the Tribunal, Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel, Professional Independence of a Lawyer, Misconduct
Reassigned to D. Rickert 12/9/15; May need additional investigation; Plans for screening 3/22/16
Swafford, William 015-1069 1 8/19/15 11/5/15 Competence; Declining Representation; Diligence; Communication; Fees; Expediting Litigation; Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters; Misconduct
Ellsworth, Keen 015-1073 15 8/19/15 10/15/15 JRD/LW 15 Complaints arrived in a cluster alleging stock trade fraud;
In Investigations: Asst. Bar Counsel assigned early. FBI involved in alleged stock fraud matter.
Boggess, Brian 015-1088 1 8/21/15 12/8/15 Competence; Diligence; Communication
Cook, Thomas 015-1094 1 8/24/15 11/16/15 2/4/16 KF/TB 3/4/16 Competence; Diligence; Communication; Fees; Failing to respond to State Bar; Misconduct
Pending Screening
Rojas, Luis 015-1095 1 8/24/15 10/29/15 JRD Missing important allegations of embezzlement of client funds, but did not state who the client was. G has been non-responsive to our letters
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
Ingrassia, Daniel 015-1119 1 8/31/15 11/10/15 Scope of representation; CommunicationTaylor, Andrew 015-1124 1 9/1/15 9/1/15 Trust Account Violation
Fronczek, Thomas 015-1129 1 9/1/15 9/28/15 Safekeeping Property; Responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants; Aiding in unauthorized practice of law
Chakwin, Stephen 015-1137 1 9/2/15 3/26/16 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters; Misconduct
Investigation
Rosenberger, James
015-1160 1 9/8/15 11/18/15 1/20/16 JVI/WJ 2/20/16 3/22/16 Diligence; Communication; Bar Admission and Disciplinary matters; Misconduct
Routsis, William 015-1410 1 11/4/15 11/4/15 2/2/16 KF/LP 2/2/16 2/11/16 Responsibilities of Partners, Mangers and Supervisory Lawyers; Conflict of Interest; current clients; Reporting Professional Misconduct; Misconduct
Voted for FH 2/11/16; PENDING COMPLAINT
20
Office of Bar Counsel Master Case List - April 1, 2016
1
A B C D E G I J K L M N O R S T URespondent Lead Case # # Files Date
Rec'dInv.Open
Inv. Rpt. Atty/Paralegal
Prosecu.Assigned
Screened Hearing Allegations Status
236
237238
239240
Hamilton, Michael 015-1414 1 11/4/15 12/14/15 Criminal Conviction On 10/29 Attorney self reported Battery, Disturbing the Peace conviction. PETITION FILED PENDING OTSC
Scalia, Joseph 015-1420 1 11/5/15 11/5/15 2/12/16 JRD/WJ 2/25/16 JUDICIAL REFERRAL: Competence; Diligence; Communication; Fees; Declining or terminating representation; Responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants; Failing to Respond to State Bar
Pending Screening
Zobrist, Caleb 015-1427 1 11/9/15
Mendenhall, Ryan 015-1433 1 11/9/15 2/8/16 Competence; Declining/Terminating Representation; Diligence; Communication; Fees; Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters
Alexander, Ryan 015-1482 1 11/15/15 11/18/15 Competence; Diligence
21
1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Board of Governors
FROM: Marc Mersol, Director of Finance and Information Systems
DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Financial Operations Report M E S S A G E
Financial Operations February 29, 2016 Balance Sheet Cash and cash equivalents as of 02/29/2016 is $4,809,464 (page 6). Most of these funds are designated for specific purposes; $133,343 designated for LRIS grants, $209,724 for LRIS non‐granting fund, $632,755 for section carry forwards, $2,300,000 for 2016 negative cash flow period April through November (expected each year), $595,786 for the Client’s Security Fund, and $700,000 for the Operating Designated Fund and $232,856 in Dues Designated Fund. State Bar of Nevada Main Operations – Overview Overall, the YTD net expense for main operations is $86,787, $49,220 higher than then anticipated (page 17). This is mainly due to members paying their dues later than anticipated. As of March 31, 2016 dues payments are close to previous years March 31 dues payments. Revenues for main operations were under projections by $107,904 and operating expenses were under projected by $70,337. The net revenue for all activities (page 22) is $16,585. All most all departments saw expenses lower than budgeted. The variances in salaries, taxes and benefits, unless otherwise indicated, are the result of the overtime, vacancies, and timing of vacations. Applied Overhead, Direct Overhead, and Postage are highly variable items. Variations that are noteworthy in those categories are pointed out for individual departments. POINTS OF INTEREST MEMBERSHIP AND ADMINSTRATION (pages 9‐11) Revenue
Membership and Administration Revenue Membership Fees are under projection by $117,812. Members are paying their dues much later than anticipated. This could be due to this being the first year for postcard dues. An unusually high number of members paid their dues in March so we fully expect dues to reach the budgeted amount.
2
MEMBERSHIP AND ADMINSTRATION continued (pages 9‐11) Expenses
Administration Expenses (page 9) Direct Overhead is $1,549 over budget mostly due to timing. Temporary Staffing is $2,706 under projections due to staffing needs being met by part‐time staff working extra hours (member services department) instead of using temporary staff. BOG Meetings/Travel is over projected $5,330 due to higher airline travel to Reno for the meeting with the Court and timing. BOG Officers Expense is $3,964 over projected due to timing. BOG Member Relations is $6,180 over projected mostly due to sponsorship for National Judicial College Event and NV Judicial Leadership Summit not anticipated at time of budget. Executive Director Travel is $1,560 under projected due to timing. Legal is under projected $4,243. This is a highly variable line items, thus variations from projections are expected. Website is $4,514 under projected due to timing of invoices (D4 Advanced Media paid in March 2016). Discipline Expense (page 10) Expenses Direct Overhead is $1,365 under projected due to timing of contract to scan and empty storage unit’s contents. Travel is $1,145 under projected due to staff not attending planned meetings as anticipated. (Deputy Bar Counsel did not travel to Annual Meeting with Court or the NOBC conference, only Bar Counsel attended.) Discipline Costs is $9,685 under projected due to fewer contested hearings completed, more conditional guilty pleas, which means lower overall case related costs. Discipline Costs Recovered (a contra‐expense account) is $11,025 over projected due to an increase in Supreme Court orders ordering payment and staff trained on collections. Investigators is $7,555 under projected due to timing of invoices. Library/Publications is $1,463 over projected due to timing Practice Takeover is $1,350 under projected. This is a highly variable line item.
3
Discipline Expense continued (page 10) Research is $1,331 under projected due to timing of receipt of invoice. NLAP (page 10) Expenses LCFL Contracted Services is $6,800 under projected due to timing of invoices from LCL contractor. NLAP Outreach is $1,491 under projected due to timing of February invoice from NLAP contractor. ADMISSIONS (page 12) Revenue Application Fees are under projected $1,655 due to approximately 28 fewer applications being purchased than anticipated. Exam Filing Fees are over projected $11,325 due to approximately 14 more applicants filing than anticipated. Exam Penalties is under projected by $12,375. This is a highly variable line item that is depends on number of applicants who apply after the first deadline. This variance is due to a lower number of applicants paying late fees than anticipated (projected 35% but actual was more like 27%). Hearing Fees is under projected by $2,350 due to timing. Other is under projected by $2,490 due to arbitrator application fees being lower than anticipated. Expense Background/Credit/FBI is under projected by $5,220 due to timing. Exam Proctors is over projected by $2,495 due to an increase in proctors because of increase in number of accommodations. Exam Supplies/Other is over projected by $1,641 due to timing of ordering of exam supplies. CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION (Page 13) Revenue Live Seminars is under projected $11,434 due to about 5 fewer in attendance at trial skills programs ($2,400), 15 fewer than anticipated at Feb. mediation CLE ($4,500), 8 fewer wildlife law attendees than anticipated ($2,000), Immigration seminar not as popular as anticipated and rescheduled to April ($2,700). Online CLE is over projected by $10,995 is due to continued growth in popularity of online formats and timing. Nevada Lawyer Self Study is $3,515 under projected due to fewer than anticipated chose to purchase this format to satisfy March CLE requirements. Direct Overhead is under $1,286 due to invoice and product for seminar room have not yet been received (tables and stools). Members/Public Relations is under $1,000 due to replenishment of branded pens have not yet been ordered.
4
PUBLICATIONS Nevada Lawyer (page 14) Revenue Nevada Lawyer Advertising is $6,870 under projected due to timing. Expenses Publication Committee is under projected by $2,865 due to cancellation of March in‐person meeting; expenses already incurred for that meeting (airfare) will be rolled over for use at a future meeting. PUBLICATIONS Books & Manuals (page 14) Revenue Product (Books) Sales is $7,056 over projected due to strong pre‐sales of Nevada Appellate Practice Manual. More than 130 copies have been sold prior to arrival of hardcopy inventory. Royalties: Books and Manuals are under projected by $1,937 due to fewer sales of Nevada Civil Practice Manual than anticipated. Expenses Graphic Design/Proof Reading/Books & Manuals is under projected by $1,650 is due to timing of production of Gaming Law Practice Manual. Printing/Graphics: Books & Manuals is under projected $6,000 due to timing. TIP (page 15) Expense TIP Kickoff is over $2,100 projected due to timing. LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE (page 16) Revenue Revenue is under projected by $14,433. This is a highly variable line item variation are expected. Expense Advertising is under $3,289 projected due timing of online marketing project. LAW RELATED EDUCATION (page 16) Expense Mock Trial is under projected by $2,812 is due to over estimation of number of participating schools and needed expenses.
We the People is under projected by $11,070 is due to fewer students participating than anticipated. We the People SEED is under projected by $2,624 due to less participation than anticipated.
5
OTHER FUNDS (page 17) Revenue Labels/List/Other is over projected $3,725, this item is highly variable and variations from projections are expected. RPC 5.5A and 7.5A (Extra Judicial/MJP) is over projected $14,150 due to receiving more reports from out of state attorneys than anticipated. SCR 42 (Pro Hac Vice) is over projected $18,486. Mostly due to refining outstanding invoice follow up process. Expense Other Committees/Member Benefits is under projected $2,950 due to using in‐house development for programs rather than outside consultant. CLIENT’S SECURITY FUND (page 18) The CSF generates revenue from Member Dues, SCR‐42 transactions, Voluntary Member Donations, and Client Reimbursement. As of February 29, 2016, the CSF received $141,925 from Member Dues and $1,500 in Voluntary Member Donations. Additionally The CSF received a total of $15,150 from pro hac transactions. LEASED PROPERTIES (Note that budget and projections were adjusted to reflect the sale of 600 East Charleston) Revenue Revenue (Rent) is under projected by $3,386 due to timing. SECTION SUMMARY P&L (pages 23‐25)
Note, board liaisons received detail P&Ls for sections each month.
Section carry forwards @ 12/31/2015 total $632,755.
STATE BAR OF NEVADA
BALANCE SHEET (combined)
( UNAUDITED )
February 29, 2016
ASSETS
2015 2016
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 1) $5,746,409 $4,809,464
Operating Designated Fund $700,000
LRIS Granting Funds $133,343
LRIS Non‐Granting Funds $209,724
LCFL Donated Fund $5,000
Section Carry Forward Designated Fund $632,755
Funds Needed for 2016 Negative Cash Flow $2,300,000
Clients Security Fund $595,786 Dues Designated Fund $232,856
Accounts Receivable (Note 2) $7,432 $10,008
Prepaid expenses $125,708 $106,115
Total Current Assets $4,925,587
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
600 E. Charleston Building and Building Improvements $943,130 $0
Reno Building & Improvements $998,130 $998,130
3100 W. Charleston Building and improvments $3,608,965 $5,448,624
3100 W. Charleston Building FF&E $222,870 $263,548
Non Operating Income (Gain on Sale of 600 East Charleston) 0 0 0 0 0
Loss on Disposal of fixed asstes 0 0 0 0 0
Net Change in Funds All Activities 118,016 16,585 (99,756) (39,778) (206,500)
(Projected and Variance does not include CSF or Sections)
Page 22
1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: The Board of Governors
FROM: Marc Mersol, Director of Finance
DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Investment Committee Meeting Report
M E S S A G E
The Investment Committee met on March 23, 2016 and are recommending that the Board of Governors utilize the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARs) program through Bank of Nevada to manage the State Bar of Nevada’s investments. CDARs is a national program that uses our local bank to manage multiple CD purchases (see attachment 1). Unlike an investment contract, this is a service provided by the bank and we not committed in any way beyond the maturity date of CDs purchased on our behalf. CDs are the primary investment vehicle for State Bar funds. The Board of Governors are being asked to approve the recommendation of the Investment Committee. This recommendation is being made for the following reasons;
The State Bar of Nevada has considerably less cash than it did 18 months ago due to new building purchase and improvements. Additionally the State Bar of Nevada has entered a period where yearly cash flows are expected to be negative.
Cash for long term investing is under $1,000,000 and consists of cash that may not be long term. (Section carry forwards, etc.)
Currently, the State Bars primary cash management strategy is no longer focused on long term investments. Cash management will now be focused on cyclical cash flows.
Several investing entities were solicited and either did not respond or were not interested in managing funds due to short term nature, not meeting dollar amount thresholds, or due to investment limitations. They included Nevada State Bank, Clark County Credit Union, Fidelity Investments, Hancock Bank, Edward Jones, and Vanguard.
Per our investment policy it is time to RFP new investment manager. In the past year we have seen declining service by our current manager Nothern Trust Securities, Inc. (NTSI). (investments not made, funds transfers from incorrect accounts, etc.)
The CDARs program and process will be very similar to our NTSI process and will include a Money Market intermediary account just like NTSI.
2
Funds are insured to $250k when in money market either waiting for CD to be purchased or after CD has matured.
Money Market Fund and CDs are registered to the State Bar of Nevada
Fees are similar to the NTSI fees. (Bank receives one or two basis points on CD) The Investment Committee reviewed the following information.
1. Typical Cash Flows 2. Current Investments and Balances 3. Alternatives to CD purchases
1. Typical Cash Flows
The State Bar of Nevada goes through a cash surplus period, a cash neutral period, and a cash deficit period.
2. Current Investments and Balances As of 02/29/2016 the State Bar of Nevada has approximately $4,407,432 in cash and investments. This will go up slightly in March and then the State Bar of Nevada will enter its negative cash flow period. The State Bar of Nevada’s Primary Investment vehicle is through Northern Trust Securities (NTSI). When the State Bar has surplus cash, it is wired to Northern Trust, they purchase CDs that have the highest available national rates as well as ensure that the CDs are within FDIC limits. All securities in our NTSI account are electronically registered to State Bar of Nevada. They are
-1000000
-500000
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
Jan March May July Sept Nov
Typical State Bar of Nevada Yearly Cash Flow
3
State Bar of Nevada assets, and have nothing to do with the assets of NTSI. If NTSI went under, the State Bar has a safety net with National Financial Services as a custodian for all the assets. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. regulates both. We use a ladder approach for maturity dates where we do our best to ensure that maximum CDs are invested and mature as they are needed during cash deficit periods. If a CD matures that is not immediately needed, it is either held in a money market or reinvested long in a long term CDs with NTSI. Additionally, we purchase 90 day United States Treasury Bills on occasions where no CDs are available, or available CDs had undesirable maturity dates. Accounts @ 02/29/2016 Approximate Cash/Cash Equivalents balance in bank(s) as of 02/29/2016 $4,407,432 $132,529 in the operating bank account, Bank of Nevada. This is our main operating account. $156,933 in the Bank of Nevada internet commerce account. This account is where funds from
online payments to the State Bar of Nevada are received. During negative cash flow periods this is typically transferred to the operating account to cover current expenses.
$25,276 in the Bank of Nevada merchant account. This account is where funds from onsite
credit card payments are received. During negative cash flow periods this is typically transferred to the operating account to cover current expenses.
The combined total of Bank of Nevada accounts exceeds FDIC limits due to a large amount of deposits the last two days of February due to the deadline for dues payments. We had an extremely high amount of dues payments as members paid before late fees attached to dues on March 2nd.
$74,139 in Northern Trust Bank (Separate entity from Northern Trust Securities.) $919,187 is in Northern Trust Securities Money Market. These funds SIPC insured to $500k. After the SIPC, the investments are insured by Lloyds of London and Capco. The additional protection is up to $1,900,000. $3,099,368 is invested in CDs and Treasury Bills (9 individual CDs) through Northern Trust Securities. FDIC insured to $250k each CD. Attached is the 02/29/2016 Northern Trust Securities Statement and a summary statement of Northern Securities. Current Performance of investments Average non-weighted interest rate on CDs is 0.47%. Northern Trust does not charge us account fees. When they quote CD yields, it is net of a fee that is built in to the price of the CD which will bring the yield. Usually the CD will have a fee of 0.1%, the longer out the maturity date the higher the cost. On a $250,000 CD held for one year, this fee would be $250.
4
Future Cash Needs
Cyclical cash flow
Long term cash flow
3. Alternatives to CD Purchases Investment of surplus funds are governed under Supreme Court Rule 86(ii) as listed below 11. In addition to commercial banking or savings accounts, the board of governors shall have the power to invest surplus funds in any of the following investments:
(a) Time certificates of deposit; (b) Bonds and debentures of the United States, the maturity dates of which shall not extend more than 10 years from the date of purchase;
(c) Bills and Notes of the United States Treasury, the maturity date of which is not more than 10 years from date of purchase; (d) Obligations of the United States Postal Service or the Federal National Mortgage Association, the maturity date of which is not more than 10 years
from the date of purchase; (e) Bonds of federal agencies, where underwritten by or payment is guaranteed by
the United States.
Current Interest Rates Based On Criteria Above. 11(a) refers to the CDs that we currently Purchase. 11(b) is treasury bonds that typically are a year or much longer. Current rates for one year is 0.62% interest 2 year is 0.96%. 11(c) refers to T-Bills and typically matures under one year. Current interest rates are 0.469%. 11(d) An example would be an agency bond such as a “Fannie Mae Agency Bond” 2 year interest rate is 0.855% 11(e) Same as d, but could be Federal Home loan bond or Federal Farm Credit Bank. These are typically five to 10 years papers. Current rates are at four years at 1.85%,and five years at 2.6%.
5
Attachment 1 CDARS From the website http://banking.about.com/od/cds/a/cdars.htm “CDARS stands for Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service. CDARS is a program that allows you to spread your money among various banks, usually to stay below FDIC insurance limits at any given bank. CDARS is a way to have somebody else manage the risk of bank failures for you.
Why Would I Use CDARS?
FDIC insurance only covers your deposits up to certain limits. There are a variety of ways you can increase your coverage - titling accounts properly, spreading your money among various banks, and so on. If you do not want to do all the legwork yourself (or if you have a lot of money to spread around), you can use CDARS.
Your bank will spread your money among other member banks, ensuring that your principal and interest never get above FDIC insurance limits. You don’t have to open accounts at different banks or read statements from each of those banks - you just use the CDARS program.
How do I Use CDARS?
To use CDARS, you must use a bank that participates in the CDARS program. CDARS is run by Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC, and banks must join the program to participate.
If you have money that you want to put in CDs, you hand it over to the participating bank. After that, they do the legwork of spreading it out among other FDIC insured banks for you.
From the CDARS website:
6
7
1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Board of Governors
FROM: Marc Mersol, Director of Finance and Information Systems
DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Auditor Engagement
M E S S A G E
The audit committee considered and reviewed the options of engaging Barnard Vogler for a fourth year auditing the State Bar of Nevada or sending our requests for proposals for new auditors. (Typically we have contracted with auditors for 3 years, and then optioned for fourth and/or fifth year). We work well with Barnard Vogler and Co. and their fees are well under the higher bid from our last RFP process. David Schaper has informed me that this is due to them giving us a substantial professional discount. Additionally, Barnard Vogler has familiarity with the construction loan and related improvements that were incurred during 2015 along with the rental of 600 E. Charleston and 3100 W. Charleston. They also have an in-depth knowledge of the Northern Trust investment strategy and procedures. If we stay with Banard Vogler, there will be less work for SBN staff to not having to familiarize new auditors on policies & procedures, client security fund, beginning balances, leases etc. Barnard Vogler is also engaged with the Supreme Court of Nevada for continued internal control work in 2015. Barnard Vogler has done an excellent job preparing our audits over the last three years. For these reasons the audit committee is recommending that we re-engage with Banard Vogler for a fourth year for the audit of the 2015 State Bar of Nevada financial statements. The cost will be $23,000 which is in the 2016 budget.
T0: Board of Governors FROM: Lori Wolk DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Report of the Lawyer Referral and Information Service Committee
Grant Funding According to the formula approved by the Board of Governors, the LRIS grant program is funded as follows: 75% of 2015 net revenue ($0) + 25% of granting fund ($43,059). Total amount available for funding in 2016 is: $43,059. The LRIS Committee received 7 requests totaling $111,983. As funds were extremely limited this year, the Committee is recommending partial funding for all requests totaling $43,059. The Committee respectfully seeks approval from the Board of Governors to fund the projects recommended on the attached table.
The LRIS Committee recommends funding the following:
Organization
Project/Program
Amount Requested
Amount Granted
Comments
Northeastern Nevada CASA
Recruit, train, appoint and monitor volunteers $10,000 $5,000 50% of request
SNSLP Smooth Sailing –
Secure an HR professional to coordinate with SNSLP to update HR policies & procedures, job classifications and employee handbook: Purchase video and dictation software and equipment:
Technical support for computer and cloud system:
Print publications and purchase materials to promote program, especially Elder Abuse:
Purchase NJA membership:
Purchase NBI membership for specialized CLE:
$40,049 $9,000 Funding is for print publications; technology, personnel and subscription requests were excluded
Project REAL The Inside Story (formerly known as Now You’re 18 Survival Guide) printing costs
$10,000 $5,000 50% of request
NDALC Disability Rights Workshops – Personnel Costs: Non-personnel costs:
accommodations including transportation, sign language interpreters and reproduction of curriculum in alternative formats:
USB flash drives for 300 participants:
Paper, pens, flip chart paper, markers:
$10,000 $2,000 Personnel costs were excluded
LACSN Printing of 160,000 Legal Aid brochures:
Design for 12 new brochures:
Printing of 300 revised CAP Manuals:
$19,934 $13,334 Funding is for reprinting of Legal Aid brochures; funding for new design costs and CAP manuals were excluded
VARN Website upgrade project
Web design email collection upgrade:
Email marketing firm:
Newsletter design consultant:
$2,000 $1,000 Personnel costs were excluded
RMIC Correction and prevention of innocent people wrongfully convicted in Nevada
$20,000 $7,725 39% of request
Total Available
$43,059
$111,983
$43,059
The LRIS Committee recommends funding the following:
Organization
Project/Program
Amount Requested
Amount Granted
Comments
Northeastern Nevada CASA
Recruit, train, appoint and monitor volunteers $10,000 $5,000 50% of request
SNSLP Smooth Sailing –
Secure an HR professional to coordinate with SNSLP to update HR policies & procedures, job classifications and employee handbook: Purchase video and dictation software and equipment:
Technical support for computer and cloud system:
Print publications and purchase materials to promote program, especially Elder Abuse:
Purchase NJA membership:
Purchase NBI membership for specialized CLE:
$40,049 $9,000 Funding is for print publications; technology, personnel and subscription requests were excluded
Project REAL The Inside Story (formerly known as Now You’re 18 Survival Guide) printing costs
$10,000 $5,000 50% of request
NDALC Disability Rights Workshops –Personnel Costs: Non‐personnel costs:
accommodations including transportation, sign language interpreters and reproduction of curriculum in alternative formats:
USB flash drives for 300 participants:
Paper, pens, flip chart paper, markers:
$10,000 $2,000 Personnel costs were excluded
LACSN Printing of 160,000 Legal Aid brochures:
Design for 12 new brochures:
Printing of 300 revised CAP Manuals:
$19,934 $13,334 Funding is for reprinting of Legal Aid brochures; funding for new design costs and CAP manuals were excluded
VARN Website upgrade project
Web design email collection upgrade:
Email marketing firm:
Newsletter design consultant:
$2,000 $1,000 Personnel costs were excluded
RMIC Correction and prevention of innocent people wrongfully convicted in Nevada
$20,000 $7,725 39% of request
Total Available
$43,059 $111,983
$43,059
To: From: Date: Re:
Attached now, the Committelimits. Mock Triaallowed tCommitte
Board Lisa DrApril 4Mock T
for your apprCommittee
ee. The Rules
al Committeeto serve out ee members i
of Governorsreitzer, Deput4, 2016 Trial Commit
roval is the Sthas operatedof Procedure
e members wtheir currens also attache
MEM
s ty Executive D
tee Rules of P
tate Bar of Ned as an infore formally est
who have servt terms and ed.
MORANDUM
Director
Procedure
evada Mock Trmal subcomtablish the Co
ved beyond thserve one a
M�
Trial Committmittee of theommittee’s au
he proposed additional tw
tee Rules of Pe bar’s Law uthority, com
term limit (ewo year term
Procedure. PrRelated Educ
mposition and
eight years) w. A list of cu
rior to cation d term
will be urrent
1
Rules of Procedure of the State Bar of Nevada
Mock Trial Committee
Approved April ___ 2016
I. Purpose of the Mock Trial Committee
a. The State Bar of Nevada Board of Governors has established the Mock Trial Committee
to provide direction for and to oversee the operations of the regional and state Nevada
high school mock trial competitions.
b. The Mock Trial Committee may amend as necessary the Nevada High School Mock Trial
Rules, subject to approval by the Board of Governors.
II. Committee Composition and Terms
a. The Committee shall not consist of more than 11 members appointed by the Board of
Governors. Eight members shall be from the state bar’s membership and three
members shall be non-attorneys. Non-attorney members shall have the same voting
privileges as attorney members. At least three members should reside in northern
Nevada.
b. Each member shall hold no more than four, two-year terms, subject to reappointment
at the discretion of the Board of Governors. Current members, who have served eight or
more consecutive years, as of April 2016, will be allowed to finish their current term and
serve an additional two-year term.
c. Committee members may not serve while also having an affiliation with a competing
team. If an applicant to the Committee previously served as a team attorney or teacher
coach, there must be a two year break from that service prior to serving on the Mock
Trial Committee.
d. The Board of Governors shall appoint the Chair and Vice Chair to a one-year term with
eligibility for reappointment at the discretion of the Board of Governors.
e. Committee members serve without compensation, but may be reimbursed for their
actual and necessary expenses outlined in the state bar’s guidelines for reimbursement.
III. Subcommittees
a. To facilitate competitions, the Chair may form subcommittees for the purpose of (1)
proposing amendments to competition rules, (2) selection of case materials, (3)
recruitment of volunteer judges, and (4) competition logistics.
2
b. The Chair may elect to draw upon past Committee members to serve on these
subcommittees and provide historical knowledge.
c. Subcommittee recommendations are subject to formal approval by the Mock Trial
Committee and the Board of Governors.
IV. Administration
a. Frequency: The Committee shall hold not less than one regular meeting each year on a
date designated by the Chair. Meetings may occur in person or via alternative formats.
b. Special Meetings: The Committee may hold a special meeting at any time upon call of
the Chair or any three members of the Committee.
c. Quorum: At least five members of the Committee must be present to constitute a
quorum.
d. Notice: The state bar staff shall give members of the Committee not less than 15 days’
notice of the time and place of each regular meeting and not less than five days’ notice
of the time and place for each special meeting. Any member may waive notice of any
meeting either before or after the meeting.
e. Designation of Alternate Chair: If the Chair is absent from any meeting, the Vice Chair
shall act as the temporary chair to preside at the meeting.
f. Voting: Each Committee member shall have a single vote. Action of the Committee shall
be by majority vote of the members present.
g. Alternative Forms of Voting: The Chair may direct that consideration of an issue may be
submitted to the Committee for vote by alternative means, including email. In that
event, binding action of the Committee shall be by a majority of the votes received and
shall be reduced to writing.
V. Amendments
These rules may be amended at any time by a majority vote of the members of the
T0: Board of Governors FROM: Lori Wolk DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Request for Formation of a New Section
Attached is an application under Article 7 of the State Bar of Nevada Bylaws to form a Marijuana Law Section.
The persons who are submitting this application and who are willing to serve as initial officers are:
1. Alicia R. Ashcraft ‐ Chair 2. Amanda N. Connor – Vice Chair 3. Melissa L. Waite ‐ Secretary 4. Margaret A. McLetchie ‐ Treasurer
19 additional active members of the State Bar in good standing have indicated their willingness to join and become members of this section:
1. Jeffrey Barr 2. Tisha Black 3. Carlos Blumberg 4. Derek Connor 5. Krisanne Cunningham 6. Riana Durrett 7. Lynn Fulstone 8. Pete Georgis 9. Neal Gidvani 10. Brian Hardy 11. Melanie Hill 12. Lee Iglody 13. Jennifer Lazovich 14. Michael McNerny 15. Lesley Miller 16. Brian A. Morris 17. Richard (Tick) Segerblom 18. Phillip Silvestri 19. Hardeep “Dee” Sull
2
The immediate and long range goals of the Marijuana Law Section are:
Enhance the role and skills of the lawyers engaged in the practice of marijuana law through study, collection, development and dissemination of materials on subjects of interest to marijuana law practitioners;
Assist in the formation, administration and implementation of programs, forums and other activities for the education of members of the State Bar of Nevada in matters pertaining to marijuana laws and regulations including, without limitation, continuing legal education opportunities; and
Recognize and discuss means of improving the law and the practice of law in the field of marijuana law
Annual dues are requested to be set at $25. If approved, this will be the 28th section/division. The other 27 are listed below:
Administrative Law Section Alternative Dispute Resolution Section Animal Law Section Appellate Litigation Section Bankruptcy Law Section Business Law Section Construction Law Section Elder Law Section Energy, Utilities and Communication Law Section Entertainment Law Section Environmental and Natural Resources Law Section Family Law Section Gaming Law Section Insurance and Health Law Section Intellectual Property Law Section International Law Section Labor and Employment Law Section LGBT Section Litigation Section Paralegal Division Probate and Trust Law Section Public Lawyers Section Real Property Law Section Solo and Small Practice Section Tax Law Section Tribal Law Section Young Lawyers Section
AshcraftBarr.com
2300 West Sahara Avenue Suite 1130
Las Vegas, NV 89102 702•631•7555
Writer’s e-mail: [email protected] March 21, 2016 Board of Governors Via Email [email protected] State Bar of Nevada 3100 W. Charleston Blvd. | Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Re: Application for Marijuana Law Section Board of Governors: The undersigned active members are applying for the formation of the Marijuana Law Section of the State Bar of Nevada. In accordance with the Board of Governors bylaws, we provide the following information:
A list of 23 active members of the State Bar of Nevada who are in good standing and willing to join to become members of the Marijuana Law Section;
The designated field of law is Marijuana Law;
The immediate and long range goals of the Marijuana Law Section are: o Enhance the role and skills of the lawyers engaged in the practice of marijuana law
through study, collection, development and dissemination of materials on subjects of interest to marijuana law practitioners;
o Assist in the formation, administration and implementation of programs, forums and other activities for the education of members of the State Bar of Nevada in matters pertaining to marijuana laws and regulations including, without limitation, continuing legal education opportunities; and
o Recognize and discuss means of improving the law and the practice of law in the field of marijuana law.
Proposed bylaws for the Marijuana Law Section are attached;
The proposed initial officers of the Marijuana Law Section are:
o Chair – Alicia R. Ashcraft, Esq. o Vice Chair – Amanda N. Connor, Esq. o Secretary – Melissa L. Waite, Esq. o Treasurer – Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq.
Ashcraft Alicia Ashcraft & Barr LLP
Barr Jeffrey Ashcraft & Barr LLP
Black Tisha Black Lobello
Blumberg Carlos Blumberg Law
Connor Amanda Connor & Connor
Connor Derek Connor & Connor
Cunningham Krisanne Rice Reuther
Durrett Riana Athari Law
Fulstone Lynn Fennemore Craig
Georgis Pete Rice Reuther
Gidvandi Neal Gidvani Silvestri
Hardy Brian Marquis & Aurbach
Hill Melanie Melanie Hill Law
Iglody Lee Iglody Law
Lazovich Jennifer Kaempfer Crowell
McLetchie Margaret McLetchie Shell
McNerny Michael Law Office of Michael McNerny
Miller Lesley Kaempfer Crowell
Morris Brian Morris & Morris
Segerblom Richard (Tick)
Silvestri Phillip Gidvani Silvestri
Sull Hardeep "Dee" Sull & Associates
Waite Melissa Jolley Urga
Page 1 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
BY LAWS OF THE
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION STATE BAR OF NEVADA
Section 1
IDENTIFICATION
1.1 NAME: This Section shall be known as the “Marijuana Law Section, State Bar of Nevada,” and hereinafter shall be designated simply as “Section”.
1.2 PURPOSE: The purpose of the Section is to:
a. enhance the role and skills of the lawyers engaged in the practice of marijuana law through study, collection, development and dissemination of materials on subjects of interest to administrative law practitioners;
b. assist in the formation, administration and implementation of programs, forums and other activities for the education of members of the State Bar of Nevada in matters pertaining to marijuana laws and regulations;
c. recognize and discuss means of improving the law and the practice of law in the field of marijuana law; and
d. act upon all matters germane to its purpose as so described or referred to by the Board of Governors.
Section 2
MEMBERSHIP
2.1 ENROLLMENT: Any member in good standing with the State Bar shall be enrolled as a member of the Section by the payment of annual Sections dues.
2.2 TERM: The term of membership in the Section shall be for a period of one (1) year, corresponding to the membership year established by payment of State Bar dues. Membership dues shall not be prorated for any portion of a year.
2.3 THE MEMBERSHIP: Members so enrolled and whose dues are paid pursuant to the provisions of this Section shall constitute the membership of the Section.
2.4 DUES: Dues for membership in the Section shall be in an amount set by the Section and approved by the Board of Governors, payable upon enrollment and thereafter annually at the beginning of the State Bar’s fiscal year. Fees shall be paid to the State Bar of
Page 2 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
Nevada, along with all other funds generated by this Section, and appropriately accounted for by the Accounting Department of the State Bar of Nevada in conjunction with the Treasurer of the Section and shall be used for the purposes of defraying costs and expenses of the Section or such other purposes as the Board of Governors may designate. The dues shall be as determined by the Section and approved Board of Governors.
2.5 DELINQUENCY: Any member of the Section whose annual dues are more than two (2) months past due shall thereupon cease to be a member of this Section.
2.6 MEMBERSHIP: Members have the following rights:
a. to attend meetings, including meetings of the Executive Committee.
b. to vote, if eligible under Section 4.5.
c. to hold office.
d. to participate in all activities of the Section not prohibited or assigned in accordance with the Bylaws.
Section 3
COMMITTEES
The Executive Committee of the Section is authorized to establish, or to empower the Chair of the Section to establish such committees as it may deem necessary and desirable to promote effectively the activities of the Section within the jurisdiction of the Section. In establishing a new committee, the Executive Committee shall state in writing the area of its proposed activities. No action of any Section committee shall be effective until approved by the Executive Committee or by the Section.
Section 4
MEETINGS OF THE MEMBERSHIP
4.1 ANNUAL MEETING: This Section shall hold a meeting at least annually at a place and time to be determined by the Executive Committee.
4.2 NOTICE: Written notice of each meeting specifying the time and place shall be mailed or e-mailed to each member thirty (30) days prior to meeting.
4.3 QUORUM: The members of the Section present at any meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
Page 3 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
4.4 CONTROLLING VOTE: Action of the Section shall be by majority vote of the members present.
4.5 VOTING ELIGIBILITY: Any member of the State Bar and Section whose good standing can be certified by official State Bar records for thirty (30) days prior to the time of voting and who is current with his or her membership dues shall be eligible to vote.
4.6 AGENDA: Among the matters of business to be transacted at the annual meeting of the membership shall be the election of Officers and Executive Committee members. The agenda shall consist of other matters as decided by the Chair or Executive Committee.
4.7 ALTERNATE FORMS OF VOTING: The Executive Committee may direct that a matter be submitted to the members of the Section for a vote by alternate means, including mail or e-mail. In that event, binding action of the Section shall be by a majority of the votes received from members in accordance with rules fixed by the Executive Committee.
Section 5
OFFICERS
5.1 OFFICERS: The Officers of the Section shall be the Chair, Vice-Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer.
5.2 CHAIR: The general membership shall elect the Chair by a majority vote at the annual meeting of the section. The Chair shall:
a. preside at all meetings of the Section and of the Executive Committee.
b. plan and superintend the programs of the Section during that term, subject to the direction and approval of the Executive Committee.
c. superintend the performance of all duties of the Section.
d. keep the Executive Committee duly informed and carry out its decisions.
e. perform such other duties and acts as are necessary and proper to the office or as may be designated by the Executive Committee.
f. make an annual written report to the Board of Governors which shall be available at the annual meeting of the State Bar.
5.3 VICE-CHAIR: The Vice-Chair shall be elected in the same manner as the Chair and for the same term. The Vice-Chair shall aid the Chair in the performance of the responsibilities of office in the manner and to the extent the Chair may request, and shall perform such further duties and have such further powers as usually pertain to this office, or as may be
Page 4 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
designated by the Chair or the Executive Committee. In case of death, resignation, or disability of the Chair, the Vice-Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair for the remainder of Chair’s term or disability, as the case may be. In the event the Chair is temporarily unavailable, the Vice-Chair shall assume and perform the duties of the Chair.
5.4 SECRETARY: The Secretary shall be elected in the same manner as the Chair and for the same term. The Secretary shall consult and assist all the officers of the Section; be the liaison between the Section and the State Bar staff regarding the retention and maintenance of books, papers, documents, and other property; keep a true record of the proceedings of all meetings of the Section and of the Executive Committee; and attend generally to the business of the Section as directed by the Chair. The Secretary shall maintain the official copies of the Bylaws, Minutes, Membership Rolls, List of Executive Committee Members and Officers of the Executive Committee.
5.5 TREASURER: The Treasurer shall be elected in the same manner as the Chair and for the same term. The Treasurer shall monitor all accounts, reports, and other documents prepared as to Section funds, revenues and expenditures, and seek to make certain that all such accounts, reports, and other documents are at all times accurate and correct; report on the Section’s present and projected financial condition at each meeting of the Section Executive Committee; advise the Officers and Executive Committee as to the financial impact of any proposed action by the Officers, Executive Committee or Section which, in the judgment of the Treasurer, would have a significant impact on the financial condition of the Section; at least once a year, prepare and submit a projected budget to the Executive Committee for approval or modification at such time as may be expressly fixed by the Executive Committee, which shall be done in a sufficient time to submit to the membership and the State Bar Board of Governors for approval. The Section budget shall be effective only upon approval by the Board of Governors, a copy of which, once approved, shall be maintained by the Treasurer. The Treasurer shall also submit a copy of the Section budget to the Section membership, at the annual meeting, a report on the Section’s financial affairs and financial condition; prepare such other recommendations and special reports on financial affairs of the Section as may be requested by the Chair of the Section.
5.6 TERM: All officers shall serve a one (1) year term on election by secret ballot from among the membership of the Executive Committee at the annual meeting. Officers may be re-elected to the same office more than once but may not serve more than eight (8) consecutive years on the Executive Committee.
Section 6
THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
6.1 POWERS: The Executive Committee shall be vested with the powers and duties necessary for the administration of the affairs of the Section. The policy of the Executive Committee shall be consistent with the policies set by the Board of Governors. It shall especially
Page 5 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
authorize all committees which entail the payment of money, and shall authorize the expenditure of all monies appropriated by the State Bar for the use or benefit of the Section. It shall not, however, authorize commitments which entail the payment of more money during any fiscal year than the amount appropriated to the Section for the fiscal year. The Executive Committee shall elect the Officers from among its members.
6.2 COMPOSITION: The Executive Committee shall be composed of:
a. a non-voting “ex officio member,”. The most recent past Chair shall serve in this position unless there is good cause to depart from the same.
b. ten (10) voting Executive Committee members (including the members elected as Officers), each of whom shall serve two-year terms, with the Executive Committee members being comprised of four (4) members from the North and six (6) members from the South.
c. if a Chair leaves that position by expiration of term of office (as opposed to death, disability, or resignation), the retiring Chair shall become an ex officio member of the Executive Committee for a period of one (1) year, even if that person’s term of office on the Executive Committee has otherwise expired.
6.3 CONTROLLING VOTE: Action of the Executive Committee shall be by majority vote of those members present. A quorum consisting of a majority of the Executive Committee members shall be required to conduct its business.
6.4 MEETINGS: The Executive Committee shall hold at least four (4) regular meetings each year to dispatch any necessary business, with those meetings being held quarterly in January, May, September, and at the annual meeting as provided for in Section 4.1, or as proximate to those months as practicable. The Chair may, and upon request of three (3) members of the Executive Committee, call special meetings of the Executive Committee.
6.5 POLL OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: In urgent matters requiring immediate attention, the Chair may, and upon request of three (3) members of the Executive Committee, submit in writing to each of the members of the Executive Committee a proposition upon which the Executive Committee may be authorized to act, and the members of the Executive Committee may vote upon the proposition either by written ballot, by telephone or e-mail vote, confirmed in writing which may be accomplished by electronic means, to the Secretary, who shall record the proposition and votes in the matter.
6.6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUTHORITY: Between meetings of the Section, the Executive Committee shall have full power to perform all acts and functions which the Section itself might perform. Any such action taken by the Executive Committee shall be reported to the Section at its next meeting.
Page 6 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
6.7 COMPENSATION OF EXPENSES: No salary or other compensation shall be paid to any member of the Section for performance of services to the Section. However, the members may be reimbursed for such reasonable and necessary telephone, reproduction and other similar out-of-pocket expenses which are incurred as a result of the performance of such services and as are specifically authorized by the Chair of the Section or the Executive Committee.
6.8 TERM: Executive Committee Members shall serve for two (2) years. They may serve four (4) consecutive terms. The time served in filling a vacancy for part of a term shall not be included in computing the eight-year limit, nor shall the eight-year limit preclude a member of the Executive Committee who serves as Chair-elect during his or her eighth year from thereafter serving as Chair.
Section 7
SUCCESSION OF OFFICERS AND VACANCIES
7.1 OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Between annual meetings of the Section, the Executive Committee may fill vacancies in its own membership, or in the offices of Vice-Chair, Secretary, or Treasurer. Members of the Executive Committee and Officers so elected shall serve until the next annual meeting of the Section at which time the membership of the Section shall elect Officers and/or Executive Committee members to fill any unexpired terms existing at the time. The Board of Governors shall approve all appointments.
7.2 ABSENTEEISM: If any Officer or member of the Executive Committee shall fail to attend two consecutive meetings of the Executive Committee, his office shall be automatically vacated, unless excused upon good cause accepted by members of the Executive Committee.
7.3 RESIGNATION: Any officer may resign by giving written notice to the Executive Committee.
7.4 REMOVAL: Upon written notice, the General Membership may remove a member of the Executive Committee by a majority vote.
Section 8
CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PROJECTS
All educational projects of the Section for which CLE credits will be sought must be submitted to the Continuing Legal Education of the State Bar Department for approval. The Continuing Legal Education Department will administer and coordinate all such projects with the Section. Net profits or losses of such projects will be divided in a manner consistent with Board approved policies.
Page 7 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
Section 9
LEGISLATION
The Section may draft or propose to support or oppose the adoption of legislation by the Nevada State Legislature. The Section’s proposed legislation or position on legislation is consistent with its purpose and (1) relates closely and directly to the administration of justice; (2) involves matters which are not primarily political and as to which evaluation by lawyers would have particular relevance if not related closely and directly to the administration of justice; or (3) comes within the Section’s special expertise and jurisdiction. Any proposed legislative position must be adopted by the Section pursuant to this Section and Section 7.10 of the State Bar of Nevada Bylaws. Any committee of this Section, including the Executive Committee, may draft or propose to support or oppose the adoption of legislation by the Nevada State Legislature. Any such draft legislation or proposal must be approved by the Executive Committee of this Section. If the Executive Committee approves the draft legislation or the taking of the position pursuant to these Bylaws, the Executive Committee, by and through the Chair or Vice Chair, must present the draft legislation or legislative position to the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Nevada for review pursuant to Section 7.10 of the State Bar of Nevada Bylaws. No committee of this Section is permitted to present the draft legislation or the proposal to the Board of Governors; only the Executive Committee may do so and only after the draft legislation or proposal is approved by the Executive Committee.
Section 10
ACTION OF THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA
No action of the Section shall be represented or construed as the action of the State Bar of Nevada until the same has been approve by the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Nevada.
Section 11
AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS
If the Section wishes to enter an amicus curiae appearance, approval must be obtained from the Board of Governors. The request must be in writing and must include a synopsis of the question involved, the posture of the case, the position to be taken in the amicus appearance, and the anticipated cost of appearing amicus curiae including lawyer fees, if any. The question involved must be directly or substantially affect
admission to the practice of law, discipline of members of the bench or bar, the method selecting members of the judiciary or other questions of substantial interest to the State Bar or Section. If the Board of Governors approves the filing of an amicus curiae brief appearance by a committee, the Bar will pay any costs for the appearance.
Page 8 of 8
MARIJUANA LAW SECTION BYLAWS
Section 12
AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS
These Bylaws may be amended at any annual meeting of the Section by a majority vote of the members of the Section present and voting, providing such proposed amendment shall first have been approved by a majority of the Executive Committee. They shall become effective upon approval by the Board of Governors, and may be amended or repealed at any time by the Board of Governors on its own motion.
Accepted:
Chairperson
1
MINUTES BOARD OF GOVERNORS MEETING
Carson City, NV January 19, 2016 January 20, 2016
________________________________________________________________________ A meeting of the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Nevada was convened on January 19 and 20, 2016. The following members were in attendance: Larry Digesti, President Bryan Scott, President Elect Gene Leverty, Vice President Elana Turner Graham, Immediate Past President Paola Armeni Kimberly Buchanan Julie Cavanaugh Bill Eric Dobberstein Richard Dreitzer Troy Isaacson (January 20, 2016 session) Paul Matteoni Ann Morgan Richard Pocker Ryan Russell Kari Stephens Ryan Works State Bar staff present: Kimberly Farmer Gale Skala Lisa Dreitzer Marc Mersol Shelley Young Stan Hunterton Guest via teleconference: Dan Waite
2
JANUARY 19, 2016 CALL TO ORDER President Larry Digesti called the meeting to order with quorum present at 3:50 pm. DISCUSSION CLE Board, State Bar Response Report Larry Digesti gave a synopsis of the Supreme Court December 8, 2015 public hearing on ADKT 0499 and the Nevada Board of Continuing Legal Education (NVCLE) Business Plan. Specific issues/questions by the Court included:
CLE exemption for attorneys over 70 years old
CLE buyout
CLE Specialization
Exemptions for providers
NVCLE Board reserves
Administrative Expenses
Governance Kim Farmer reviewed highlights of the joint meeting on December 28, 2015 between the state bar’s CLE Board Taskforce and the NVLCE Board. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss specific questions presented by the Court during the public hearing. Two additional items were discussed
Discipline/CLE Suspensions
Substance Abuse The Board suggested the CLE Board Taskforce review the issue regarding exemption for attorneys over 70 years old. And that they seek viewpoints from the attorneys through surveys, section discussions, Nevada Lawyer articles, etc. Larry Digesti discussed changing the CLE requirement in the area of substance abuse, addictive disorders and/or mental health to an annual requirement rather than once every 3 years. It was moved, seconded and carried to submit an ADKT seeking to change the CLE requirement substance abuse, addictive disorders and/or mental health to a one 1 annual requirement. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 5:20 pm.
JANUARY 20, 2016 RECONVENE AND CALL TO ORDER President Larry Digesti called the meeting to order with quorum present at 8:40 am. DISCIPLINE REPORT Overview ‐‐ Stan Hunterton reviewed the progress made in the Office of Bar Counsel (OBC) and the focus for 2016. He provided a synopsis of the panel training conducted in late 2015 covering the application of the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions. Mr. Hunterton also reported that there is a policy now in place to respond to Judges who file a complaint. Fees ‐‐ In previous years the state bar recovered approximately less than one half of its direct costs for disciplinary proceedings. None of the overhead costs were recovered. This prompted a look into how OBC might become better at recovering these fees and place more of the burden on lawyers who violate the rules. The OBC presented different methods as to cost recovery.
3
The Board wants to explore this further and asked the OBC to work with a taskforce to develop recommendations. The following members will be members of a taskforce: Bryan Scott, chair, Paola Armeni, Richard Dreitzer, Gene Leverty, Julie Cavanaugh‐Bill and Ryan Works. Discipline Reappointments ‐‐ It was moved seconded and carried to approve the following attorneys for a three year reappointment commencing 12/31/15 Southern Disciplinary Panel Daniel Royal Daniel Waite Jason Gerber Northern Disciplinary Panel Bruce Hahn PRESIDENT’S REPORT Supreme Court Meeting Overview ‐‐ Larry Digesti reviewed the agenda for the Court meeting. ACTION ITEMS
12/31/15 Financial Report
Marc Mersol reviewed the 2015 Financial Report. It was moved, seconded and carried to accept the 12/31/15 Financial Report. Proceeds from 600 East/Loan Payoff
The State Bar office at 600 East Charleston was sold in December 2015. The Board considered the use of funds from the sale of the 600 East building to pay down the note on 3100 West Charleston and further discussed options including using funds from either the Dues Designated Fund or the Operating Reserve to pay off the note or to carry note to term. It was moved, seconded and carried to use the funds from the sale of 600 East Charleston and funds from the Dues Designated Fund to pay off the balance due on 3100 West Charleston loan.
Proposed Changes to Fee Dispute Bylaws
Dan Waite highlighted the proposed changes to the Fee Dispute Arbitration Program and the suggested change to SCR 86(12). Upon discussion, a taskforce was formed to consider the proposed changes to the Fee Dispute Bylaws and report recommendations to the Board at the April meeting. Members of the taskforce are Paola Armeni, Paul Matteoni, Gene Leverty and Richard Pocker.
Break The meeting broke for lunch at noon for a joint meeting with the Supreme Court. The Board reconvened at 3:45 p.m.
4
Commission on Judicial Ethics Appointment
It was moved, seconded and carried to appoint Cassandra Jones to the Standing Committee on Judicial Ethics for a two year term commencing January 1, 2016. Eric Dobberstein, Paola Armeni and Richard Pocker abstained from voting.
Personal Injury Board of Specialization
Gene Leverty reviewed the applications for the Board of Personal Injury Specialization. All qualified candidates were interviewed via teleconference. It was moved, seconded and carried to appoint Michael Pintar for a two year appointment.
ABA House of Delegates
Kim Farmer presented a synopsis on the proposed resolutions that will be before the ABA House of Delegates at the ABA Midyear meeting in San Diego. The Board is asked to consider both Resolution 105 and Resolution 113 so that we may direct the state bar’s ABA Delegates as to how to vote. Resolution 105 The Commission on The Future of Legal Services seeks adoption of ABA Model Regulatory Objectives for the Provision of Legal Services by the ABA House of Delegates. The adoption of the Model would (1) create a framework to help courts assess existing regulatory framework and (2) identify and implement regulations related to legal services beyond the traditional regulation of the legal profession. Resolution 113 This Resolution from the Standing Committee on Lawyer Referral and Information Service, et.al. seeks adoption of rules establishing a new evidentiary privilege for confidential communication between a client and a lawyer referral service for the purpose of retaining a lawyer or obtaining legal advice from a lawyer. Members of the state bar’s LRIS Committee considered this Resolution. Those responding support the Resolution. It was moved, seconded and carried to support Resolution 113. The Board did not support Resolution 105.
EXECUTIVE SESSION The Board entered into Executive Session at 4:14 pm and concluded at 4:36 pm. CONSENT AGENDA Approved: Minutes of November 2015 Approved: Advertising Advisory Committees’ Annual Report APPROVED ATTORNEY RESIGNATIONS Lisa Elaine Bitten Janice Kay Dearman James Eugene Fitzgerald Nancy Killeen
5
Courtney Mitchell Forest Morgan Sarah Vance Jeffrey Wilcox APPOINTMENTS Transition into Practice Mentor Approved for TIP Mentor appointment: Jeremy Alberts Steven Baker Thomas Beko Alexander Chen Brenda Erdoes
Robert Erquiaga Alan Freer Gabriel Grasso Dawn Hooker Evan James Gayle Kern Gregory Kraemer Risa Lang Christopher Pandelis James Puzey Brenda Weksler Donald H. Williams Approved for TIP Mentor reappointment: Travis Barrick Eunice Beattie Steven Don Bennion Karla Butko Adam Clarkson Sara Cope William Coulthard Sandra DiGiacomo Bryan D. Dixon Matthew Grode Dennis Gutwald Marjorie Guymon Daniel Hayward Robin Holseth
Thomas Hubert Mark Krueger Roy Nelson Jennifer P. Noble Wm. Randolph Patton Tamara Peterson (Beatty) Jeffrey Rugg Brian Rutledge Frank Spees Mark Thierman Steve Waters Charles Zumpft William Zychlewicz
Section Appointments ‐ Approved Elder Law Section Chair: Keith Tierney (reappointment) Vice Chair: Homa Woodrum Secretary/Treasurer: Nancy Solinger
6
Construction Law Section Chair: Casey Quinn Vice Chair: Carolyn Renner Secretary: Eva Segerblom Treasurer: Michael Wadley Entertainment Law Section Chair: Matthew Pruitt Vice Chair: Howard Siegel Secretary: David Kahn Treasurer: Russell Christian Advertising Advisory Committee Approved: Michael Lowry, Chair One‐year term, effective March 2016. Clients’ Security Fund Approved: Janet Pancoast, Chair One‐year term, effective February 2016. Harvey Gruber, Vice Chair One‐year term, effective February 2016. Courtney Leverty, Attorney Member Three‐year term, effective March 2016. Jason Stoffel, Attorney Member Three‐year term, effective retroactively to November 2015. Fee Dispute Arbitration Approved for a three year term commencing January 2016: Maya Clark James Murphy There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 4:50 pm.
M EM ORA N DU M
To: Board of Governors
From: Shelley Young, Legal Administrator
cc: Kimberly Farmer, Executive Director
Date: March 24, 2016
Re: Applications for Resignation
Attached are copies of the Applications for Resignation filed by the following attorneys:
NAME STATUS: Active or Inactive
OUT OF STATE AGE
1. 1. Kelley A. Alexander Inactive Yes – Arizona 48 2. 2. Gregory S. Como Active Yes – Arizona 52 3. 3. James H. Davenport Active Yes – Washington 67 4. 4. Justin C. Denham Inactive Yes - Oregon 36 5. 5. David R. Ford Active No 67 6. 6. Mitchell E. Grodman Inactive Yes – Florida 53 7. 7. Karen E. Heggie Inactive Yes – California 64 8. 8. Gary A. Hengstler Inactive Yes - Tennessee 69 9. 9. Stacy L. Luedtke Inactive Yes – Illinois 39 10. 10. Colleen F. McMullen Inactive Yes - Utah 61 11. 11. James M.O. Miller Inactive Yes – Canada (Ottawa, ON) 37 12. 12. Rachelle J. Nicolle Inactive No 61 13. 13. Rocky N. Unruh Active Yes, California 63 14. 14. Bryan W. Wagner Inactive No 61 15. 15. Amanda Willis Inactive Yes – Texas 33 16. 16. Eric Willis Inactive Yes - Texas 32
SCR 98(5)(a) provides that any member of the State Bar who is not actively engaged in the practice of law in this state, upon written application on a form approved by the state bar, may resign from membership in the state bar if the member: (1) has no discipline, fee dispute arbitration, or clients' security fund matters pending and (2) is current on all membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to the member's practice of law in Nevada. Such resignation shall become effective when filed with the state bar, accepted by the Board of Governors and approved by the Supreme Court.
Pursuant to Exhibits A - C of the respective applications, each applicant above meets the requirements of the Rule and has no discipline, fee dispute , clients' security fund, or administrative matters pending. Exhibit D demonstrates SCR 115 compliance . As the Rule states, resignations shall become effective only after acceptance by the Board of Governors and approval by the Supreme Court. If the application is approved, the Office of Bar Counsel will file the appropriate petition with the Supreme Court. C:\Users\syoung\Desktop\Resignations\April 2016\Resignations Memo - April 2016 BOG Meeting.rtf
T0: Board of Governors FROM: Lori Wolk DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: Section Appointments The Elder Law Section is requesting that Cary Colt Payne be appointed to the office of Secretary/Treasurer for a one year term ending December 2016: The Treasurer of the Solo & Small Practice Section resigned his position and the Section is requesting that Jenny Hubach, who currently serves as the Section Secretary, also be appointed to serve as Treasurer for the balance of the term ending October 2016.
T0: Board of Governors FROM: Lori Wolk DATE: April 13, 2016 RE: LRIS Committee Reappointments It is requested that the Board of Governors reappoint the following Committee members to three year terms, ending June 2019: Lance Hendron, LRIS Committee Chair Russell Christian Melissa Ingleby
LRIS Committee Members
1 3/28/2016
The LRIS Committee consists of a minimum of five (5) and a maximum of twelve (12) attorneys.
NAME ORIGINAL APPT. DATE
DATE TERM
EXPIRES
FIRM CONTACT INFORMATION YEARS IN PRACTICE
AREA OF PRACTICE ON LRIS SERVICE
Lance Hendron, Chair
April 2010 June 2016 Lance J. Hendron Attorney at Law, LLC
Jimmy Howard September 2014 June 2017 The Howard Law Firm
1835 Village Center Circle Las Vegas, NV 89134 702-385-5533 [email protected]
24 Personal Injury, Products Liability, Wrongful Death Medical Malpractice
Yes
To: From: Date: Re:
The Fee Governor Name
Ara Shiri The Fee Governor Name
Michael Thomas Eric DobElizabeth
James HRyan Ma
Patrick MRoyi Mo
Brian PeBruce ScDavid StKelly SwMichael Justin W
Board Lisa DrMarchFee Di
Dispute Arbs for reappoi
nian
Dispute Arbis for reappoi
Bohn Coyle berstein h High oward acDonald McKnight as zzillo chupp anton anson Van
Watkins
of Governorsreitzer, Deputh 17, 2016 spute Arbitra
itration Comntment to a o
itration Comntment to a t
MEM
s ty Executive D
ation Commit
mmittee respeone‐year term
mittee respethree‐year te
MORANDUM
Director
tee Members
ectfully submm:
Regional C
LVC
ectfully submrm:
Regional Pa
LVB Rural
LVB Reno
LVA
LVA
LVB
LVC LVA LVA Rural
LVB LVB LVB
M
s
mits the follo
Chair
mits the follo
anel
owing name
Effecti
Apri
owing names
Effecti
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
Apri
to the Boa
ive Date
l 2016
s to the Boa
ive Date
l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016 l 2016
ard of
ard of
The Fee Dispute Arbitration Committee respectfully submits the following names to the Board of Governors for a three‐year appointment to the Fee Dispute Arbitration Committee (Applications attached). The nominees have been contacted and are recommended to serve as Fee Dispute members. Name Regional
Panel Effective Date Other Committees, Boards, Panels,
& Organizations
Jill Greiner Reno April 2016 ADR & Administrative Law Section Kathryn Newman LVC April 2016 n/a Sadiq Patankar (layperson) Reno April 2016 US Air Force Auxiliary / Sierra Military
Hospitality Services
State Bar of Nevada
Committee Application
Application Type: I am an attorney applicant
Name: Jill Greiner
Bar number: 4276
Date admitted to State Bar of Nevada: 1991
If admitted to other jurisdictions, please list state and year of admission:
California 1990
Name of Committee appointments you seek:
Fee Dispute
Political Party (Permanent Member - Commission on Judicial Selection):
Employer:
Self-Employed-Contract Hearing Officer/Mediator for Government Agencies
If you have disciplinary matters pending, please explain:
Have you ever had a finding of discipline - public or private - in this or in any other jurisdiction?
No
If you have had a finding of discipline, please explain:
List any State Bar sections of which you are a member:
State Bar of Nevada
Committee Application
ADR SectionAdministrative Law Section
List pro bono activities including organizations and pro bono hours:
Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (Attorney Member)-10 to 15 hrs per yearBoard member of CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocate)
Fields in which you practice:
My practice is as follows: Settlement Judge, Nevada Supreme Court, Hearing Officer for the City ofReno, Nevada State Board of Medial Examiners and Nevada State Board of Osteopathic Medicine,mediator for the Department of Business and Industry, Real Estate Division, State of Nevada and theUnited States EEOC, and Judge for the Inter-Tribal Court of Appeals.
Please provide a brief statement indicating why you wish to serve on this committee and whatyou can contribute.
I have extensive experience in ADR, and I would like to assist in the resolution of these types ofdisputes. I enjoy pro-bono and panel work, and my position on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Boardwill expire soon.
I do hereby waive any confidentiality and consent to disclosure to the Board of Governors andthe Chair of the particular committee(s) of all discipline files and records in jurisdictions where Iam or have been admitted to practice regarding any complaints filed against me, open or closed,pending or resolved for the limited purpose of considering my application in this appointmentprocess. Yes
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the State Bar of Nevada Conflict of Interest Policy and I agree toabide by its terms during the tenure of my appointment. No
I request an advisory opinion to or a waiver from the conflict of interest policy. No
Experienced administrative hearing officer, mediator, arbitrator and attorney Licensed to practice law in the State of Nevada and the State of California
EXPERIENCE SETTLEMENT JUDGE 2007-Present Nevada Supreme Court Settlement Conference Program Appointed by the Nevada Supreme Court to conduct settlement conferences for civil appeals pending before the Nevada Supreme Court HEARING OFFICER 2007-Present Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners
Preside over disciplinary administrative hearings; draft orders, synopsis, findings, and conclusions
HEARING OFFICER 2013-Present Nevada State Board of Osteopathic Medicine
Preside over disciplinary administrative hearings; draft orders, findings, and recommendations for Board review
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER 2015-Present City of Reno Preside over administrative hearings for the City of Reno, including business licensing, building permits and code enforcement appeals INDEPENDENT CONTRACT MEDIATOR 2014-Present Department of Business and Industry, Real Estate Division, State of Nevada Mediation of common interest community disputes MEDIATOR 2009-Present United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Mediation of employment discrimination, civil rights claims and sexual discrimination claims APPELLATE COURT JUSTICE 2007-Present Inter-Tribal Court of Appeals (ITCA) Preside over criminal and civil appeals before the ITCA; draft orders and decisions HEARING OFFICER 2012-2014 Nevada Department of Administration, Division of Human Resource Management Presided over appeals of disciplinary actions of state permanent classified employees ARBITRATOR 2006-2012 Court Annexed Arbitration Program, Second Judicial District Court Conducted arbitration hearings and drafted arbitration awards for civil cases ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT CODE HEARING OFFICER 2010-2014 Washoe County Presided over Washoe County Code Enforcement appeals MEDIATOR 2009-2011 State of Nevada Foreclosure Mediation Program Mediation of foreclosure proceeedings
DUE PROCESS HEARING OFFICER 1998 - 2007 Nevada Department of Education and Douglas, Clark, and Washoe County School Districts
Presided over administrative hearings pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
ASSOCIATE TRIBAL JUDGE 2002 - 2006 Reno-Sparks Indian Colony Presided over civil, criminal and administrative cases PRIVATE PRACTICE 1996 - 2004
Legal representation in criminal and civil matters in State and Federal District Court
APPELLATE LEGAL DEFENDER 1996 - 2002 City of Reno
Appointed by the Reno Municipal Court to represent indigents in their criminal appeals to Washoe County District Court
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY, RENO 1992 - 1996 Criminal and Civil Divisions Drafted pleadings and litigated in Reno Municipal Court and Washoe County District Court DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WASHOE COUNTY 1991 - 1992 Civil Division Drafted pleadings and litigated in Washoe County District Court JUDICIAL CLERK 1991 The Honorable Judge James Stone, Washoe County District Court Conducted legal research, drafted proposed decisions and orders JUDICIAL CLERK 1989 - 1990 The Honorable Justice John Code Mowbray, Nevada Supreme Court Conducted legal research, drafted legal memorandums and proposed decisions
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Commissioner, Nevada State Board of Post-Secondary Education 2015 - Present Commissioner, Nevada Indian Commission, State of Nevada 2013 - 2015 Board member, Washoe Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Foundation 2015 - Present Nevada Dispute Resolution Coalition 2015 - Present Alternative Dispute Resolution Section, State Bar of Nevada 2012 - Present Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board, State Bar of Nevada 2006 - Present Northern Nevada Women Lawyers Association 1996 - Present
SUMMARY OF PAST COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Intern, Connecticut Law Revision Commission and Connecticut Attorney General’s Office; Executive Board Member, Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP); Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA); Santa Clara University School of Law: Peer Advisor Program Coordinator, Policies and Programs Committee and Faculty Appointments Committee.
SPECIALIZED TRAINING
HARVARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW: Civil Mediation Seminar NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: Civil Mediation, Handling Domestic Violence Cases,
Essential Skills for Tribal Appellate Judges, Essential Skills for Tribal Court Judges ABA SECTION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Advanced Mediation and Advocacy Skills Institute EEOC MEDIATOR TRAININGS
EDUCATION
Santa Clara University School of Law. Juris Doctor, 1989. Emory Scholarship recipient University of California, Berkeley, Bachelor of Arts, Social Science, 1985
State Bar of Nevada
Committee Application
Application Type: I am an attorney applicant
Name: Kathryn Newman
Bar number: 13733
Date admitted to State Bar of Nevada: 6/1/2015
If admitted to other jurisdictions, please list state and year of admission:
Arizona - 1999; Illinois - 2002
Name of Committee appointments you seek:
Fee Dispute, Lawyer Referral and Information Service
Political Party (Permanent Member - Commission on Judicial Selection):
If you have disciplinary matters pending, please explain:
Have you ever had a finding of discipline - public or private - in this or in any other jurisdiction?
No
If you have had a finding of discipline, please explain:
State Bar of Nevada
Committee Application
List any State Bar sections of which you are a member:
None
List pro bono activities including organizations and pro bono hours:
None. My employment prohibits pro bono representation.
Fields in which you practice:
Criminal Law.
Please provide a brief statement indicating why you wish to serve on this committee and whatyou can contribute.
I'm interested in serving on either the Fee Dispute or the Referral committee. I have been looking foropportunities to serve on a bar commitee in order to become more active in the bar and to contribute toour community.
My experience as a trial attorney and previous ADR experience will be useful in assisting to resolve feedisputes. My experiences working in Goverment and in other pro bono capacities in the past will beuseful in assisting in the Attorney Referral process.
I do hereby waive any confidentiality and consent to disclosure to the Board of Governors andthe Chair of the particular committee(s) of all discipline files and records in jurisdictions where Iam or have been admitted to practice regarding any complaints filed against me, open or closed,pending or resolved for the limited purpose of considering my application in this appointmentprocess. Yes
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the State Bar of Nevada Conflict of Interest Policy and I agree toabide by its terms during the tenure of my appointment. Yes
I request an advisory opinion to or a waiver from the conflict of interest policy. No
KATHRYN CECILIA NEWMAN 9812 Aspen Grove Place, Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 (312) 771-7308
[email protected] U.S. ATTORNEY=S OFFICE, DISTRICT OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS, NV Criminal Assistant U.S. Attorney 2009 – Present
$ Prosecuted variety of white collar crimes, including tax evasion, mortgage fraud, embezzlement, securities fraud, health care fraud, and environmental crimes. Managed and directed associated grand jury investigations.
$ Successfully first-chaired over ten jury trials and second-chaired another ten jury trials. Successfully argued and defended Ninth Circuit appeal.
$ Office representative to District Local Criminal Rule Committee. $ Faculty member at US Forestry and US Fish and Wildlife Annual Conference and Training. $ Nominated for Director’s Award in 2012 for work on mortgage fraud initiative.
JENNER & BLOCK LLP CHICAGO, IL Commercial Litigation Associate 2005-2009
$ Represented clients in commercial class actions, securities class actions and criminal investigations, and federal habeas corpus appeals.
$ First-chaired criminal bench trial in Illinois State Court. First-chaired mediation arising from government contract dispute. Argued Seventh Circuit habeas appeal.
$ Drafted substantive pleadings, discovery motions including motions to dismiss, motions in limine and summary judgment motions. Prepared witnesses and took and defended over thirty depositions and fifty employee interviews in connection with internal investigations. Designed and implemented over twenty significant paper and electronic document collections. Worked closely with clients and e-discovery experts to develop and implement collection and retention strategy.
DEPAUL UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL CHICAGO, IL Adjunct Professor, Legal Research and Writing 2009
$ Taught two sections of Advanced Legal Research and Writing. Designed exercises from experiences in practice.
$ Second-chaired securities arbitration. Took direct and cross examination in several securities class action arbitrations and federal trials, took and defended depositions, drafted dispositive motions and Wells submissions, supervised large document production, administered settlements, selected, retained and worked with experts, and supervised junior associates.
LEWIS & ROCA LLC PHOENIX, AZ Commercial Litigation Associate 1999-2002
$ Took and defended depositions, drafted discovery motions, conducted large document reviews, negotiated settlements, made numerous appearances in court and administrative proceedings, worked with expert witnesses, and independently managed numerous matters.
Admitted in Nevada, Arizona and Illinois
EDUCATION GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER WASHINGTON, DC Juris Doctor, 1999 GPA 10.15/12.0 Dean=s List 1997-1999 Executive Editor, The State and Local Tax Lawyer, 1998-1999 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON, DC Bachelor of Arts, Government 1995 GPA 3.49/4.00 Varsity Women=s Crew, 1992-1995
SELECT PUBLICATIONS AND SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS ACourts Rule Consumers Cannot Challenge Arbitration Clauses Until They Are Invoked,@ Bloomberg Corporate Law Journal, Vol. 2, Issue 1, Winter 2007. ALitigation 210: Drafting Interrogatories,@ ABA Young Lawyers= Division Series, December 2006. ACircuits Split On A Court=s Authority to Compel Arbitration in Other Districts,@ Bloomberg Law Reports, Vol 2, No. 1., January/February 2006. Panelist, Illinois State Bar Association, AABC of Legal Practice - Landlord Tenant Law,@ March 2008. Panelist, Chicago Bar Association, ASecurities Class Actions,@ October 2007.
SERVICE TO THE BAR AND COMMUNITY
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS Member, Lift #150 Group Project, 2014 to present AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION Co-Chair, Pro Bono Subcommittee, Trial Section, Litigation Committee, 2006-2008. CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION Chair, Vice Chair, and Seminar Coordinator, Class Action Section, 2007-2009. Seminar Coordinator, Class Action Section, 2006-2007. CORPORATE COUNSEL COMMITTEE Illinois State Membership Liaison.
AWARDS
Chicago Volunteer Legal Services, Distinguished Service Award, 2006 Nominee, Director’s Award, Department of Justice, 2011
State Bar of Nevada
Committee Application
Application Type: I am a non-attorney applicant
Name: Sadiq Patankar
Bar number: N/A
Date admitted to State Bar of Nevada: N/A
If admitted to other jurisdictions, please list state and year of admission:
N/A
Name of Committee appointments you seek:
Clients' Security Fund, Fee Dispute
Political Party (Permanent Member - Commission on Judicial Selection): Republican
Do you have any disciplinary matters pending? N/A (non-attorney applicant)
If you have disciplinary matters pending, please explain:
N/A
Have you ever had a finding of discipline - public or private - in this or in any other jurisdiction?
N/A (non-attorney applicant)
If you have had a finding of discipline, please explain:
N/A
State Bar of Nevada
Committee Application
List any State Bar sections of which you are a member:
N/A
List pro bono activities including organizations and pro bono hours:
US Air Force Auxiliary - Civil Air PatrolSierra Military Hospitality ServicesWashoe County Republican Party
Fields in which you practice:
Business ConsultantCourt Appointed Fiduciary
Please provide a brief statement indicating why you wish to serve on this committee and whatyou can contribute.
Please see attached introduction letter.
I do hereby waive any confidentiality and consent to disclosure to the Board of Governors andthe Chair of the particular committee(s) of all discipline files and records in jurisdictions where Iam or have been admitted to practice regarding any complaints filed against me, open or closed,pending or resolved for the limited purpose of considering my application in this appointmentprocess. N/A (non-attorney applicant)
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the State Bar of Nevada Conflict of Interest Policy and I agree toabide by its terms during the tenure of my appointment. No
I request an advisory opinion to or a waiver from the conflict of interest policy. No
Subject: Introduction of Major Sadiq Patankar: My name is Sadiq Patankar. My formal education includes Master in Business Administration degree from the University of Wales – Trinity Saint David in the United Kingdom of Great Britain. I am energetic, self-motivated and goal oriented individual with strong desire to succeed. I have over two decades of experience to offer that includes military, government, judicial, education and business organizations. I have proven track record of improving efficiency and profitability. I have tackled an assortment of demanding business issues including regulatory compliance needing legal remedies. You will find that I bring unique combination of business and life experience. I am U.S. Army veteran with honorable discharge from active duty in the regular Army. I am Major in U.S. Air Force Auxiliary – Civil Air Patrol. I am Director of Finance for the Nevada Wing of the Civil Air Patrol. I am winner of 2015 National Director of Finance of the year award. I served as a Court Appointed Fiduciary for Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada. I served as a Court Appointed Specialist for the US Bankruptcy Court. I am serving on the governing board of a community media startup venture since its formation. In these roles I provide leadership advice, diversity of perspective and guidance to add value. I participate in operational, administrative, tactical and strategic management. My life experiences combined with analytical skills gained through assortment of roles equip me for management of complex projects. I am committed to serve all stakeholders with integrity, transparency, due diligence and good judgment as well as confidence to stand up for an independent point of view to ensure organization is run legally and ethically. To further discuss how I can help; please feel free to call me or e-mail me. I would be pleased to discuss any potential situations where my experiences, skills and passion may have positive impact. I hope you will give me an opportunity to prove my competency. For now, I thank you in advance for your time and consideration. I look forward to our discussions and further communication. Respectfully, Sadiq Patankar
MEMORANDUM To: Board of Governors From: Theresa Freeman, Advertising Committee Manager Date: April 1, 2016 Re: Advertising Advisory Committee Reappointments The Southern Advertising Advisory Committee respectfully requests the Board of Governors reappoint the following members to the Committee: Chet Glover Two-year term, effective July 2016.
Farhan Naqvi Two-year term, effective July 2016. The Northern Advertising Advisory Committee respectfully requests the Board of Governors reappoint the following members to the Committee: James I. Barnes (Chair) One-year term, effective June 2016. Adam Hosmer-Henner Two-year term, effective July 2016.
Bryce Rader Two-year term, effective April 2016. Walter Sullivan’s term on the Southern Advertising Advisory Committee is set to expire on April 7, 2016. Mr. Sullivan has not attended an advertising meeting in the past 2 years. His reappointment to the Committee will not be renewed due to lack of attendance at meetings. Carrie Parker of the Northern Advertising Advisory Committee has stepped down effective March 2, 2016, due to work and family obligations, and William Schuller has stepped down from the Southern Advertising Advisory Committee effective March 18, 2016, due to his current employment workload. Therefore, an announcement will be disseminated to the membership to recruit new members to fill two vacancies on the Southern Advertising Committee and one vacancy on the Northern Advertising Committee. A current listing of both Northern and Southern Advertising Advisory Committee members is attached.
2. Bennair R. Bateman 11/01/2012 11/01/2016 2024 Eric Palacios & Associates 2050 S. Eastern Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89104 702-444-7777 [email protected]
3. Mark Coburn 08/01/2013 08/01/2017 2025 Law Office of Mark T. Coburn 732 South 6th Street, #100 Las Vegas, NV 89117 702-340-0446 [email protected]
4. Chet Glover
07/01/2010 07/01/2018 2022 Smith Larson & Wixom Hills Center Business Park 1935 Village Center Circle Las Vegas, NV 89134 702-252-5002 [email protected]
5. Daniel Heidtke 01/01/2016 01/01/2018 2028 Duane Morris LLP 100 N. City Parkway, Ste. 1560 Las Vegas, NV 89106 702-868-2605 [email protected]
07/01/2012 07/01/2018 2024 Naqvi Injury Law 9500 W. Flamingo Road, Suite 104 Las Vegas, NV 89147 Main: 702-553-1000 Direct: 702-754-1515 [email protected] Asst: Janae Page [email protected]
10. Donald Paradiso 01/01/2016 01/01/2018 2028 Rosen Law Offices, P.C. 1212 S. Casino Center Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89104 702-476-5101 [email protected]
11. Taylor Randolph
12/01/2011 12/01/2017 2023 Randolph Law Firm, P.C. 2045 Village Center Circle, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89134 702-877-1313 [email protected] ; [email protected]
12. Dirk Ravenholt
09/01/2007 11/01/2017 2019 Ravenholt & Associates 2013 Alta Drive Las Vegas, NV 89106 702-647-0110 [email protected]
13. Eduardo San Miguel
09/01/2007 11/01/2017 2019 Eduardo G. San Miguel Atty at Law 700 S. Third Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 702-385-2360 [email protected]
14. Joseph Wirth
06/05/2009 06/05/2017 2021 Mainor Wirth, LLP 1215 S. Ft. Apache Rd., Suite 120 Las Vegas, NV 89117 702-464-5000 [email protected]
15. Homa Woodrum 01/01/2016 01/01/2018 2028 Woodrum Law LLC 3470 E. Russell Rd., Ste. 212A Las Vegas, NV 89120 702-825-3483 [email protected]
BOG Liaison: Kimberly Buchanan [email protected] List Updated April 2016
MEMORANDUM To: Board of Governors From: Stephanie Hirsch, Assistant Director, CLE Date: March 31, 2016 Re: Continuing Legal Education Committee Appointments The following CLE Committee members’ current term will expire May 2016. The committee respectfully submits their names to the Board of Governors for a new three-year term appointment. Name Effective Date Area(s) of Practice Ken D’Alessandro June 2016 Intellectual Property Melanie Muldowney June 2016 Insurance Defense, Real Estate, Civil
Litigation Heidi Stern June 2016 Appellate Litigation, Commercial Litigation
Jeremy Alberts term also expires in May however, he is unable to commit to another 3-year term. As of June 1, 2016 there will be one available position on the CLE Committee. During the February 4, 2016 meeting, the CLE Committee voted to retain the current Chair and Vice Chair and respectfully submits their names to the Board of Governors for a one-year term appointment: Name Effective Date Position Andrew Mierins June 2016 Chair Melanie Muldowney June 2016 Vice Chair
A list of committee members is attached.
CLE Committee Members
All terms commence on June 1 and end on May 31 of the year noted. Effective: June 2015
BOG Liaison: Eric Dobberstein CLE Dept. Staff: Stephanie Hirsch and Marchelle Hedrick
Name YR Appointed Current Term
Max Term Firm Contact Area(s) of Practice
1 Andrew Mierins Committee Chair
2009 2018 (2016) 2018 Fourth Judicial District Court [email protected]
Hearing Master 775‐738‐1551
2 Melanie Muldowney Vice‐Chair
2010 2016 (2016) 2019 Gannon and Associates [email protected] Insurance Defense, Real
Estate, Civil Litigation 702‐726‐3346
3 Jeremy Alberts 2013 2016 2022 Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn, & Dial, LLC
3100 W. Char l e s ton B lvd . , Su i t e 100 Las Vegas , NV 89102 Phone 702 .382 .2200 Fax 702 .385 .2878
9456 Double R Blvd., Ste. B Reno, NV 89521-5977 Phone 775.329.4100 Fax 775.329.0522
MEMORANDUM
To: State Bar of Nevada Board of Governors From: Angela Washington, Access to Justice Director Date: April 1, 2016 Re: Access to Justice Commission Report Below are updates and upcoming initiatives of the Access to Justice Department:
Access to Justice Commission Meeting The Access to Justice Commission met on Friday, March 11, 2016 at which time the Community Reinvestment Act was discussed in relation to how incentives provided to participating IOLTA financial institutions in Nevada could be used to support the IOLTA Program in Nevada. Also, progress on the Statewide Service Delivery Plan was discussed. Legal aid organizations in Nevada have contributed to this plan through discussions and input over the last two years; the plan will serve as the blueprint for legal service delivery among the coalition of participating legal service providers. Participating legal service providers will review drafts of the plan and thereafter the plan will be presented to the larger Commission. The goal is to have a completed plan this year. Lastly, the Commission welcomed a presentation by Buck Lewis, an ambassador for the National Pro Bono Online project. The National Pro Bono Online project is an online legal services program whereby those seeking legal assistance can log on and ask questions of pro bono attorneys from their particular state. The program has been adopted by approximately forty states. Mr. Lewis described the program, the number of states involved in the program and welcomed questions of Nevada’s Access to Justice Commission members. A subcommittee has been established to examine the program further. ONE Promise Nevada Campaign
The 2015 ONE Promise Nevada Campaign saw an increase of 16% participation compared to participation in 2014 with more than 1,600 attorneys volunteering to take one pro bono case or take one legal clinic last year. The established 2015 goal was 10% increase. The ONE Campaign was launched in 2013 by the Access to Justice Commission and the State Bar of Nevada with the goal of increasing pro bono participation in the state. At this year’s Ely Family Law Conference, Justice Michael Douglas, on behalf of the Access to Justice Commission, acknowledged four attorneys for their outstanding pro bono work in 2015 through the ONE Campaign. The awardees were: Kimberly Surratt of the Surratt Law Practice, P.C. in northern Nevada; Kelly C. Brown, of Kelly C. Brown, PLLC in eastern Nevada; Corinne Price of The Fine and Price Law Group in southern Nevada and Natalia Vander Laan of Vander Laan Law Firm, LLC in western Nevada. Lastly, the ONE
STATE BAR OF NEVADA
3100 W. Char l e s ton B lvd . , Su i t e 100 Las Vegas , NV 89102 Phone 702 .382 .2200 Fax 702 .385 .2878
9456 Double R Blvd., Ste. B Reno, NV 89521-5977 Phone 775.329.4100 Fax 775.329.0522
Campaign received a donation of $11,500 from the State Bar of Nevada Family Law Practice Section at the 2016 Ely Family Law Conference.
STATE BAR OF NEVADA
3100 W. Char l e s ton B lvd . , Su i t e 100 Las Vegas , NV 89102 Phone 702 .382 .2200 Fax 702 .385 .2878
9456 Double R Blvd., Ste. B Reno, NV 89521-5977 Phone 775.329.4100 Fax 775.329.0522
Juvenile Justice Taskforce
The Juvenile Justice Taskforce met on March 16, 2016 and discussed a working list of individuals who are versed in juvenile justice and who regularly work with matters associated with juvenile justice. Those individuals will be contacted to contribute to a resource bank being compiled by the State Bar of Nevada. The Taskforce is scheduled to meet again on April 8, 2016.
2016 JACKRABBIT BAR CONFERENCE June 2‐June 4, 2016
Resort at Squaw Creek, Lake Tahoe Registration Form
Name_______________________________________Name on Badge__________________________
Phone: 702‐382‐2200 Method of Payment…secure fax line for credit cards (702) 463‐5730 __Check Cardholder Name_____________________________________ __Mastercard Acct#_______________________________________________ __Visa Ex. Date_______________________ (CSV Code)____________ __Am. Express Signature____________________________________________
MEMORANDUM To: Board of Governors From: Clients’ Security Fund Committee Date: April 11, 2016 Re: Clients’ Security Fund 2015 Annual Report Attached is the Clients’ Security Fund Annual Report for 2015, which outlines the Fund’s data from the past four years. The report demonstrates how claim amounts were down again in 2015 and how the Committee’s efforts to seek restitution to the Fund have been successful in replenishing the Fund. Also, the report provides a few highlights regarding approved claims. The Clients’ Security Fund Committee reviewed the 2015 CSF Annual Report and approved it at their semi-annual meeting on April 8, 2016. It is being presented to the Board for approval.
Clients’ Security Fund 2015 Annual Report
Fund Establishment The State Bar of Nevada’s Clients’ Security Fund (Fund) was established in 1970 to reimburse clients for losses sustained when a lawyer betrays a client's trust and misappropriates the client's funds through defalcation or other dishonest acts. As such, the Fund helps the State Bar of Nevada to fulfill several of the Bar’s enumerated purposes, including: improving the administration of justice; upholding the honor, integrity, professionalism and dignity of the profession of law; applying its knowledge and experience in the field of law to the promotion of the public good; enhancing the professional competence and ethical conduct of members of the Bar; and seeking fulfillment of the obligations of the legal profession in the courts and in the community.
To some, the Clients’ Security Fund can be seen as the Bar’s single most public relations function for the State Bar. It provides a source of recovery for those members of the public who have suffered a loss at the hands of dishonest State Bar licensees.
Supreme Court Rule 86.5(1)
“Establishment. The board of governors shall maintain, from dues paid by members of the state bar, voluntary contributions and any other sources which may become available, a clients’ security fund for the purpose of providing reimbursement, in whole or in part, as a matter of grace and not of right, to persons who have sustained loss by reason of a dishonest act of a member of the state bar, acting in his capacity as an attorney and counselor at law, in the nature of defalcation or embezzlement of money or the wrongful taking or conversion of money, property or other things of value, and shall provide for the administration of such fund. The board of governors is authorized to invest such funds as is provided for in paragraph 11 of Rule 86.”
2015 Clients’ Security Fund
Committee Members
Janet Pancoast Chair
Harvey Gruber Vice-Chair
Eva G. Cisneros Jeffrey Sloane Brigid Higgins
Miriam Rodriguez Jason Stoffel
Courtney Leverty Reed Werner Zelalem Bogale Kirk Jacobson
Clients’ Security Fund Staff
Theresa Freeman Programs Manager
[2]
Clients’ Security Fund 2015 Annual Report
Fund Overview
The Clients’ Security Fund Committee is comprised of 12 members, including two lay members, who investigate claims. The Committee meets twice a year to discuss claims and determine whether reimbursement can be made to the clients. Approved claims may be reimbursed up to $50,000 per claimant.
In order to qualify for reimbursement from the Clients’ Security Fund, there must be an act of theft which occurred within an attorney-client relationship that involves an attorney no longer practicing due to suspension, disbarment, death or incapacitation. In 2015, the Clients’ Security Fund Committee reviewed 25 such claims1, and they approved 16 claims for reimbursement totaling $339,862.65.
As demonstrated by the two charts below, the number of claims reviewed and amounts approved by the Committee vary from year to year.
1 Includes claims filed, but not resolved in previous years.
The Clients’ Security Fund receives its revenue primarily through four sources: 1) a dedicated portion of every licensed attorney’s annual dues; 2) a portion of SCR 42 pro hac vice application and licensing fees; 3) donations to the Fund; and 4) restitution from attorneys on whose behalf claims have been paid.
Additionally, the Fund continues to work with the Clark County District Attorney’s Office to pursue restitution to the Fund in cases where criminal action is taken against an attorney for theft. The Fund has worked with the Office of Bar Counsel to seek reimbursement to the Fund from suspended or disbarred attorneys as a condition of their reinstatement. As a result of these efforts, restitution payments to the Fund remain steady.
The Fund Reserve Policy dictates that the Committee maintains 50 percent of the total reserve fund balance each year. This policy has helped to insure the stability of the Fund in the case of a catastrophic claims year.
2 100% of all Fund expenditures are related to claim reimbursement. Committee and staff overhead, salaries, etc. are supported through the State Bar of Nevada. 3 Represents total reimbursements made after receiving subrogation agreements, not total amount approved ($339,862.65).
Revenue & Expenditures2 Funding Amount 2015 Annual Dues $197,500.00 2015 Pro Hac Vice Fees $ 64,868.00 2015 Restitution $ 34,934.95 2015 Donations $ 2,980.00
TOTAL: $300,282.95
Reimbursements Amount 2015 Claims Paid to Date3 ($214,443.52)
[4]
Clients’ Security Fund 2015 Annual Report
Approved Claims
Last year, the Clients’ Security Fund approved 16 claims for reimbursement related to 10 attorneys as noted in the chart below.
Highlights Include:
A finding capped at $50,000 for misappropriation of funds from a family following a settlement against a nursing home following the death of their father.
A finding against a suspended attorney for nearly $45,000. The attorney failed to provide her client with the funds from a settlement in a personal injury case.
An attorney, who subsequently died, who dispersed funds from a personal injury settlement to an estate into his personal accounts from his IOLTA account.
2015 Approved Claims Attorney Name Status Awards Approved Marina Kolias Discipline
Suspended 3 $127,956.81
Barry Levinson Discipline Suspended -
Now Deceased
3 $132,556.23
Jorge Sanchez Deceased 1 $2,274.00 C. Andrew Wariner Disbarred 2 $16,280.00 John Cereso Deceased 2 $46,150.61 James Parsa Discipline
The Clients’ Security Fund received 19 claims in 2015. Claims were a mix of personal injury cases, where the attorney misappropriated clients’ settlement funds, and either bankruptcy, loan modification or divorce cases where the attorney took attorney’s fees but did no work.
Year Claims Received Attorneys Involved 2012 92 16 2013 71 20 2014 32 10 2015 19 11
Of the 19 claims received in 2015, the Committee approved five claims and denied two claims. The remaining 12 claims were received after the final Committee meeting for 2015 and are pending consideration in 2016:
The number of claims has been on a downward trend since the height of the mortgage crisis, which also coincided with a number of highly publicized issues of attorney wrong-doing that brought many more claims.
The size of the awards has increased as the number of claims has decreased.
5
2 12
2015 Claims
Approved
Denied
Pending
[6]
2015 Annual Report
3100 W. Charleston Blvd. I Ste. 100
Las Vegas I NV I 89102
www.nevadabarfoundation.org
2015 Annual Report | 2
Executive Summary
The Nevada Bar Foundation (NBF) was incorporated in 1997 as the 501(c)(3) charitable arm of the State Bar of Nevada. The
NBF was organized to support charitable giving related to access to justice and legal education programs.
In 2014, the NBF assumed management of the Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts (IOLTA) program, including the making of
annual grants to organizations that promote access to justice through direct legal services to the poor, to victims of
domestic violence and to children protected by or in need of protection of the juvenile court. This year, in its first full year
of operation, the Nevada Bar Foundation awarded $2,813,917 in IOLTA grants.
Nevada’s legal aid community received an additional boost in funding this year. In August 2014, the U.S. Department of
Justice announced a $17 billion settlement with Bank of America related to its involvement in residential mortgage-backed
securities and other unlawful conduct that contributed to the housing/financial crisis. The settlement provided for $30
million to be distributed to every IOLTA program in the country and the territories for “foreclosure related legal assistance”
and “community redevelopment legal services.” In late-April, the Nevada Bar Foundation received its portion of the
settlement: $355,046.96. Of this amount, the Foundation distributed $227,657 in grants to legal aid providers whose
programs fulfilled this purpose.
In addition to management of the IOLTA program, the NBF supports law related education. In coordination with the State
Bar of Nevada, the Nevada Bar Foundation successfully bid to host the 2018 National High School Mock Trial Championship
in Reno, NV, bringing nearly 700 students and team coaches; upwards of 400 family members; and more than 400
volunteer judges, team coordinators and competition organizers to the “Biggest Little City in the World.”
2015 Annual Report | 3
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful,
committed citizens can change the world. Indeed,
it is the only thing that ever has."
--Margaret Mead
Message from President Connie Akridge Two years ago, the Nevada Bar Foundation was a somewhat dormant organization, functioning
primarily as an entity that held Federal grant funds and donations used for law related education
(LRE). During this country’s great recession, grant funding for LRE dried up, leaving the
Foundation with a nominal role in fundraising from the State Bar of Nevada annual license
renewal process. Recognizing the need to support LRE, the Nevada Bar Foundation was
reconstituted in October 2013, starting with a small, five-member Board of Trustees committed
to building the program.
In late 2014, the Nevada Bar Foundation was honored to accept management of the Interest on
Lawyer Trust Accounts (IOLTA) program, including the distribution of IOLTA grants under SCR
216. This undertaking required the Foundation to shift gears quickly and among other things,
increase the size of our Board of Trustees to 11 members. I’m proud to state that in addition to continuing our original
objective of supporting LRE by hosting the 2018 National High School Mock Trial Competition, the Nevada Bar Foundation
has ensured access to justice to thousands of low income Nevadans in need of legal assistance.
Nevada Bar Foundation Board of Trustees
Constance Akridge, President
Richard Pocker, Treasurer
Cynthia Alexander
Ann Bersi
James W. Bradshaw
Hon. Linda Gardner
Kirk Jacobson
Mark Knobel
Margaret Wightman Lambrose
Vernon (Gene) Leverty
Lori Teicher
Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director
Lisa Dreitzer, Deputy Executive Director
A Moment of Levity…The Nevada Bar Foundation Board of Trustees received the 2015 State Bar of Nevada Medal of Justice Award Back row (left to right): Richard Pocker, Connie Akridge, Gene Leverty, Kirk Jacobsen, Jim Bradshaw. Front row (left to right): Hon. Linda Gardner, Maggie Lambrose, Lori Teicher.
2015 Annual Report | 4
IOLTA Grant Distribution: $2,813,917 The Nevada Bar Foundation focuses its charitable giving on legal aid organizations that provide a variety of pro bono legal
services statewide.
Thanks to the support of its participating financial institutions, the Nevada Bar Foundation granted more than $2.8 million
dollars to fund the 2016 operations of Nevada’s legal service providers.
To ensure distribution of IOLTA funds by population needs, the majority of IOLTA funding is distributed to a core group of
legal aid organizations, including: Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, Nevada Legal Services, Southern Nevada Senior Law
Program, Volunteer Attorneys for Rural Nevada, and Washoe County Legal Services. Secondary funding is distributed to
those legal aid organizations that provide specialized services, such as domestic violence assistance and services for
juveniles.
Participating Financial Institutions
2016 IOLTA Grant Recipients
Committee to Aid Abused Women (CAAW) $28,000
Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) – Carson City $11,200
Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) – Lyon County $14,000
Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) – Northeastern Nevada $10,500
Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) – Pioneer Territory $17,514
Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada $1,533,873
Nevada Legal Services $304,500
Nevada Rural Counties RSVP Program (RSVP) $26,600
S.A.F.E. House $12,250
Safe Nest $35,000
Southern Nevada Senior Law Program $211,892
Volunteer Attorneys for Rural Nevada $164,805
Washoe County Legal Services: General Legal Services $329,609
Washoe County Legal Services: Rural Legal Services $94,174
American First National Bank Bank of America Bank of George Bank of Nevada Bank of the West BMO Harris Bank Citibank City National Bank East West Bank Financial Horizons Credit Union First Foundation Bank First Independent Bank of Nevada First Savings Bank First Security Bank of Nevada Heritage Bank JP Morgan Chase & Co. Meadows Bank Mutual of Omaha Nevada Bank & Trust Nevada State Bank Northern Trust Bank Plaza Bank Royal Business Bank Silver State Credit Union Town and Country Bank Umpqua Bank US Bank Valley Bank of Nevada (BNLV) Wells Fargo
2015 Annual Report | 5
Client Story: A client in early stage dementia was coerced into marriage by a
much younger woman who he ‘met’ over the internet. The woman moved to the
United States and lived here long enough to marry the man before returning
home. The client faced eviction from his apartment because he had been sending
the woman half his monthly income to support her and her ‘four children.’ A pro
bono attorney obtained information which proved the woman was not who she
said she was and assisted the client to annul his marriage.
2015 IOLTA Grant Recipient Activities
The Nevada Bar Foundation distributes IOLTA grants to legal aid
organizations that provide statewide delivery of pro bono legal services,
ensuring all Nevadans in need of assistance have access to justice. This
year, 10,000 more households received services from the year prior, due
in large part to the ever increasing needs for legal services and availability
of IOLTA dollars to fund programs.
The numbers of households represented below were served with IOLTA
dollars alone (each legal service provider receives funding from multiple
sources and thus the total number of clients served is greater than
represented here). For the purpose of this report, there is one person per
household.
NEVADA COUNTIES 2015 2014
CARSON CITY 761 752
CHURCHILL 77 158
CLARK 31,331 19,701
DOUGLAS 144 124
ELKO 205 145
ESMERALDA 24 26
EUREKA 10 0
HUMBOLDT 340 296
LANDER 36 17
LINCOLN 7 16
LYON 169 250
MINERAL 331 299
NYE 89 93
PERSHING 50 74
STOREY 20 5
WASHOE 1,187 1,696
WHITE PINE 14 8
34,521 23,660
Client Story: While working as a cab driver,
a man had a heart attack during his shift. He
immediately took himself to the hospital for
treatment, without first returning his cash
pouch to his employer’s office. The cab driver
was fired and denied unemployment
benefits; the employer cited misconduct for
failing to return the pouch. A legal aid
attorney represented the driver at his
Appeals Referee hearing and the man was
awarded his unemployment benefits.
HIGHLIGHTS
MORE THAN 34,000 HOUSEHOLDS SERVED
Although the vast majority of legal services were provided in Clark and Washoe Counties, IOLTA grant funding was distributed to legal service providers who ensured pro bono representation in Nevada’s rural counties.
CLIENT SERVICES
Clients may be assisted directly through litigation or through other non-traditional means such as an Ask-a-Lawyer clinic. More than 24,000 clients were provided legal advice at self-help centers.
LEGAL MATTERS
Client legal matters run the gamut from abuse and neglect issues to assistance receiving government benefits. In 2015, majority of legal matters pertained to family law and domestic violence legal matters.
2015 Annual Report | 6
Client Story: Following allegations of abuse and neglect of
three children in northeastern Nevada, a CASA worker stepped
in to help. After the children were removed from their mother’s
home, the CASA volunteer attended parent-teacher conferences,
advocated for counseling and tutoring for the children, and
spent hours helping the kids with their homework to improve
their lack of education. The CASA volunteer advocated for the
children to be placed with their individual fathers, who visit
regularly and share time with the children to facilitate their
sibling relationship. The CASA volunteer followed through with
the transition, ensuring all three children are in a safe loving
home and are doing well in school.
Legal Matters
In Nevada, more than one million people
qualify for legal services at the 200
percent poverty measure. Ninety percent
of those people live in Clark and Washoe
Counties. IOLTA funding supports people –
whether they reside in urban or rural
areas – who are most vulnerable when
legal emergencies occur. Whether facing
eviction, emergency medical situations,
domestic violence or unscrupulous
predators who steal life savings from
unwary seniors, legal assistance from well-
trained professionals can be literally the
difference between life and death.
The nature of the types of services provided from year to year can vary and is often dependent on factors such as current
economic conditions and availability of funding for dedicated programs. For example, representation for domestic violence
issues has remained consistent – largely due to the services provided by two legal service providers, Safe Nest and Safe
House,whose legal service programs concentrate on this limited issue. Alternatively, representation in family law and
housing matters increased significantly in 2015 due to availability of IOLTA funding as well as other sources of revenue for
providers such as Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada and Nevada Legal Services.
791
1,167
199
3,244
859
2,470
8,842
8,461
342
7,505
407
6,128
1,273
1,349
2014
2015
Real Property
Housing
Family Law
Domestic Violence
Consumer Finance
Civil Litigation
Abused/NeglectedChildren
Assisting a client with significant deficits in cognitive
function who was the victim of federal tax identity
theft.
Filing an appeal on behalf of a 71 year-old widow
whose sole source of income was $801 a month from
Social Security and whose food stamps were being
reduced from $16 to $6 per month.
Working with the court to allow a mother seeking
treatment for addiction to keep her children and
develop a permanency plan.
Representing a victim of domestic violence when her
abuser filed frivolous and unmeritorious motions for
custody of their shared child.
Helping a young woman with limited English
proficiency whose husband abused her, “hid” her baby
at his mother’s house, and isolated her from her family
to obtain a divorce, custody of the child and support.
Client Representation Examples
2015 Annual Report | 7
Non-IOLTA Operations
National High School Mock Trial Championship
In addition to managing the IOLTA program, the Nevada Bar
Foundation engages in programs that promote legal education. This
year, with cooperation from the State Bar of Nevada, the Nevada
Bar Foundation successfully bid to host the 2018 National High
School Mock Trial Championship (NHSMTC) competition in Reno,
Nevada. This is the first time Nevada has had the honor of hosting
the NHSMTC – and 2018 will mark the State Bar of Nevada’s 20th
anniversary of mock trial involvement.
The competition is expected to bring to Reno nearly 700 students
and team coaches; upwards of 400 family members; and more than
400 volunteer judges, team coordinators and competition
organizers. The competition’s success will hinge on volunteer efforts
and the Nevada Bar Foundation will rely extensively on lawyers,
judges/justices, and business leaders to see it through fruition.
Additionally, the Nevada Bar Foundation has formed a Steering
Committee and several committees dedicated to planning and
carry-through of competition logistics.
Colleagues Fund
The Colleagues Fund was previously established by the Nevada Law Foundation as a charitable endowment to assist low
income people with their legal problems and assist members of the public in learning more about the law and the state’s
judicial system. When the Nevada Bar Foundation assumed responsibility for the IOLTA program from the Nevada Law
Foundation, it also took over management of the Colleagues Fund. This year, the Nevada Bar Foundation contacted the 174
Colleagues and asked them to elect to maintain their donations in an endowment or release them for pro bono and law
related education purposes. Of the $468,000 held in the Colleagues Fund, $189,800 was released. The Nevada Bar
Foundation Board of Trustees elected to donate $50,000 of the released funds to support the 2018 NHSMTC, provide five
years of funding for non-IOLTA operations, and leave the remaining unrestricted dollars for future use.
NHSMTC STEERING COMMITTEE
PAUL MATTEONI, PRESIDENT
CONNIE AKRIDGE, VICE-PRESIDENT
ANN BERSI
CYNTHIA ALEXANDER
DON CHRISTENSEN
KATHLEEN DICKINSON
LISA DREITZER
KIMBERLY FARMER
GENE LEVERTY
HON. LINDA GARDNER
MARK KNOBEL
JUSTICE NANCY SAITTA
2015 Annual Report | 8
Financial Operations The Nevada Bar Foundation is the tax-exempt entity under
SCR 216 for administering Nevada’s IOLTA program, including
the distribution of grants to legal aid organizations that
provide services to the poor, victims of domestic violence,
and to children protected by or in need of protection of the
juvenile court. In addition, the Foundation engages in non-
IOLTA activities, such as fundraising to support law related
education.
Staffing to support the Foundation is provided under a
contract with the State Bar of Nevada and select IOLTA data
management and legal services are contracted with third
party vendors. These partnerships allow the Foundation to
operate with three percent of funding used for
administration, maximizing the dollars available for grant
funding.
In addition to administering the IOLTA program, the
Foundation has focused its fundraising to support the Access
to Justice Commission’s One Promise campaign and law
related education, primarily the 2018 National High School
Mock Trial Championship. Excluding funding for the Mock
Trial Championship, the Nevada Bar Foundation realized a net
profit of $9,284 in 2015.
$12,645 $45,315
$2,254,924
IOLTA Expenses
Travel, Ins., Misc. Contract Services Grants
Financial Information as of 12.31.15 (Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
2015
Cash and Cash Equivalents $4,275,100
IOLTA $2,275,102
Non-IOLTA $331,807
IOLTA Reserves $697,545
Colleagues Funds $278,200
Bank of America Settlement $355,047
IOLTA Rainy Day Reserves $116,400
Mock Trial Fund $105,006
Accounts Receivable $355,010 Prepaid Expenses $3,619 Total Current Assets $4,633,729
PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT Flagpole and Podium $11,513 Less: Accumulated Depreciation ($6,080) Net Property & Equipment $5,433 TOTAL ASSETS $4,639,162 CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $3,042,499 OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES Mock Trial Deferred Income $50,000
FUND BALANCE $1,546,663 $4,639,162
To: Board of Governors
From: Jenni Smith – Publications Manager
Date: 03/23/2016
Re: Reference Manual Status
Reference Manual Status
The Publications Department has had significant activity in the first quarter of 2016 related to reference manual projects. The following report provides a brief overview of all reference manual projects in some phase of production.
• Nevada Appellate Practice Manual 2016 – the new edition of this manual, edited by Debbie Leonard with the assistance of the Appellate Litigation Section, was released in digital format in January 2016. To date, 135 copies have been sold or pre-ordered. Hardcopy manuals are currently in production with our printer, scheduled for delivery the week of April 4.
• Nevada Gaming Law Practice and Procedure Manual – this entirely new reference manual, produced by the Gaming Law Section and edited by Greg Giordano, Jeff Rodefer and Mark Lerner, has finished copyediting and the final draft is awaiting delivery to our professional indexer. We will release the digital edition in early April, with hardcopies to follow in 6-8 weeks after the completion of indexing.
• Nevada Civil Practice Manual: Sixth Edition – this reference manual, produced in partnership with LexisNexis, is written and edited by a large team of volunteer Nevada bar members, headed up by lead editor Tracy DiFillippo. The Sixth Edition has been completely overhauled, with all-new text, including practice tips and sample forms. As of this writing, the draft is 2/3 complete, and on schedule to meet our manuscript delivery deadline to LexisNexis on June 28, 2016. LexisNexis is scheduled to deliver the new edition to customers this October.
• Nevada Jury Instructions: Civil – a revised edition of this book of template jury instructions has been drafted and is undergoing review by lead editor Judge Chuck Thompson, who has determined all but two chapters are complete and ready for subject matter review. He estimates the final two chapters will be rewritten and the draft will be ready for layout in mid-April 2016. The Publications Department is seeking a new pool of subject matter experts and editors to conduct a thorough draft review once layout is complete, estimated late May 2016.
• Sample Contracts – A short-format digital-only publication providing a series of sample contracts and forms has been completed by Publications Committee member Chaz Rainey, and is currently being formatted for review. No publication release date has yet been set for this publication.
To: Board of Governors
From: Jenni Smith – Publications Manager
Date: 03/22/2016
Re: Nevada Lawyer Financial Review
Nevada Lawyer Editorial Board – March Meeting
The Nevada Lawyer Editorial Board opted to reduce the scope of its biannual meeting in March, limiting that meeting to a web conference with an extended look at magazine finances and production schedules.
Magazine Financial Review
Every six months, the Editorial Board reviews the direct costs and revenue associated with magazine production. A copy of the most recent magazine financial review is attached. This report also includes CLE credit article sales.
Report highlights:
• Magazine direct costs are down slightly for this six-month period, slightly less than $20 per issue, due to a reduction in average page counts per issue.
• Magazine revenue has increased for this six-month period, by more than $500 per issue, due to an increase in magazine advertisement sales.
• CLE credit articles continue to be popular revenue-generating items. The two most popular articles in this six-month period were “Aircraft Accident Investigation,” from the Sept. 2015 issue and “Search and Seizure in the Roberts Court in a Nutshell,” from the Oct. 2015 issue.
FINANCIAL REVIEW Nevada Lawyer: Direct Revenue and Expenses, April 2015 – March 2016
• Average estimated magazine circulation per month: 11,000 • Average cost per issue to bar member: $0.47 • Average annual subscription cost to bar member: $5.64
CLE Article Sales by Month, July - Dec, 2015: Total $ 21,780
CLE Sales by Article: Total 512 ARTICLE TITLE PUB. DATE QTY. SOLD
JULY – DEC 2015 2015 Nevada Medical Marijuana Legislative Update Nov. 2015 65 Addiction, Substance Abuse and the Legal Profession Jan. 2013 9 Addiction: What To Do? Dec. 2013 10 Aircraft Accident Investigation Sept. 2015 85 Avoiding Successor Liability in Asset Sale May 2014 9 Benefit Corporation Legislation (online only) Feb. 2013 3 Clearing Rights for Entertainment Projects May 2015 42 Development of Renewable Energy Projects on Federal Land July 2012 1
Drafting Attorney Fees Orders to Withstand an Appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court Aug. 2013 6
Effective Contract Drafting Oct. 2013 10 Establishing a Court of Appeals Feb. 2013 2 Intracorporate Conspiracy and Civil Rights in the Ninth Court (online only) March 2015 10
Money Matters: Make Sure You’re Handling Your Clients’ Dollars with Sense Oct. 2014 35
Navigating Post-Judgment Motions in Nevada State Court Jan. 2012 1
Nevada Firearm Laws Feb. 2014 8 Problems Inherent to the Business of Practicing Law June 2015 78 Recent Changes to Real Estate Law Jan. 2014 4 Search and Seizure in the Roberts Court in a Nutshell Oct. 2015 89 Some Tips on TIPS April 2014 3 Staying Ethical in the Digital Age March 2013 17 The Uncertainties of Series LLCs Dec. 2012 2 To Facebook or Not to Facebook, That is the Question Nov. 2012 1 You Can Run But You Can’t Hide: Overcoming Evasive Actions By Insurers in Construction Defect Claims Nov. 2014 13
You Can’t Ask That Question July 2013 9
1
MEMORANDUM
To: Board of Governors From: Layke Martin, Chair, Young Lawyers Section Date: April 6, 2016 Re: YLS Report Socials The YLS hosted a very successful Young Lawyers and Judges Mixer on February 26, 2016 at Morton’s in Las Vegas. The event was very well attended by lawyers and judges. The YLS co-hosted a social with the Washoe County Bar Association and the State Bar’s TIPS program in Reno on March 17, 2016. The YLS is co-hosting a social with the Boyd Law Alumni Chapter at Oak & Ivy in Container Park in Downtown Las Vegas on April 8, 2016. The social takes place after an Alumni Chapter CLE focused on pro bono opportunities for young lawyers. Trial Academy We were delighted that for the first time scholarships were made available for students to attend the Trial Academy. Below is a summary from Lisa Dreitzer: Thanks to the generosity of the state bar's Business Law, Litigation, and Young Lawyers sections, in addition to a donation from attorney Laura Fitzsimmons, seven scholarships totaling $1,500 each were made available to young lawyers seeking the training available at this year's Trial Academy, presented by the bar's Young Lawyers Section. Another scholarship valued at $425, the cost of the Trial Academy registration fee, was donated by attorney Russell Marsh. The Trial Academy will run concurrently with the state bar's Annual Meeting in Hawaii, June 29 - July 2, 2016. The state bar's Annual Meeting Planning Committee received 27 applications for the Trial Academy Scholarships; selection of the eight recipients was based on the following criteria: - Involvement in a State Bar of Nevada section; - Practice at a small law firm; - Practice in the public sector, including legal aid organizations, non-profits and government; and - Practice in rural Nevada. We are working hard on putting together a great Trial Academy program for 2016. Maggie Lambrose is once again chairing this project and doing a wonderful job.
2
Serving Seniors On April 23, 2016 from 10:00 am - 4:00 pm at the East Las Vegas Community Center, volunteers will assist low income seniors with their estate planning needs. Training in simple estate planning was provided in advance of this event during a CLE presented by Nevada Legal Services on March 14. YLS members Linda Lam and Olesya Sidorkina are organizing this “Serving Seniors” event in conjunction with Nevada Legal Services. A similar “Serving Seniors” event is being scheduled in Northern Nevada. NLS is holding a training CLE on simple estate planning at the State Bar Center in Reno on April 8, and CLE participants will be encouraged to volunteer at the Serving Seniors event. Law Day Poster & Essay Contest The Law Day Poster and Essay Contest Awards Ceremony will take place on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 from 4:00 pm until 6:00 pm in the Jury Assembly Room at the Federal Courthouse. Judges Foley and George will attend and present the awards to the students. This year, the YLS teamed up with the Clark County Bar Association on the contest. Submissions from local elementary, middle, and high school students are due on April 22, 2016. Law Student Committee As a follow up to the November 2015 change to the Section’s bylaws to allow law students to join the Section, the Executive Council approved the creation of a Law Student Committee and the appointment of Boyd Law student Tyler Mowbray as the Committee’s first Chair.
MEMORANDUM To: Board of Governors From: Stephanie Hirsch, Assistant Director, CLE Date: March 30, 2016 Re: Inaugural Trial Skills Institute
The inaugural Trial Skills Institute was held on select Fridays from December 2015
to March 2016. Sessions were simulcast between the Las Vegas and Reno bar offices
and offered 3 CLE credit hours consisting of lecture and practicum. Attorneys could
purchase individual sessions at $200 each or a bundle of all seven programs for $995
($142 each). A price break was offered to attorneys practicing 5 years or less - $175
individual sessions or $800 for the bundle of seven sessions.
The bar was fortunate to have a wonderful faculty line-up for this series including
attorneys such as Federal Public Defender Rene Valladares, Brenda Weksler, Stan
Hunterton and Dominic Gentile. The speakers were well received by the attendees
and added much value to their sessions through great content and expertise. The
faculty members were able to help the students hone their skills through the live
interaction and feedback portions of the sessions. Anecdotally, student attorneys were
engaged and provided positive verbal feedback about the Trial Skills Institute.
The second annual Trial Skills Institute is planned for fall 2016.
Faculty Registrants Revenue Expense
Jury Selection Betsy Allen 16 - Vegas $2,975 $417.78
December 11, 2015 Jonathan MacArthur 3 - Reno
Opening Statements Brenda Weksler 10 - Vegas $1,625 $394
Discipline Update ‐‐ The Committee discussed the Master Case list and asked for follow up on the status of the grievances concerning Glen Lerner. The Committee discussed various matters concerning the Discipline Panels. David L. Phillips v. State Bar of Nevada ‐‐ This case is over nine months old and waiting for a ruling or scheduled oral argument. The Committee considered the recommendation by the bar’s attorney, Peter Angulo in this matter to “sit tight” and not ask the court for a status on the case. The Committee decided to direct Angulo to send a letter to the court asking for a status update as allowed under the local rules. The Committee also asked if there are weaknesses in our case Angulo should inform the Committee. Rule Changes – US District Court for the District of Nevada ‐‐ The Committee decided that there is no need for the bar to file a comment on the proposed rule changes.
Information, ABA House of Delegates Approved Actions and Recent Challenges to the Mandatory Bar ‐‐ The Committee was provided an update on these matters. A brief discussion covered the UBE. Rick Trachok plans to bring information to the Board at the April Board meeting regarding the Board of Bar Examiners plan regarding the UBE.
Awards ‐‐ The Committee discuss the annual awards. Notices will be sent out requesting nominations for the YLS of the Year and Volunteer of the Year awards. The Committee will review all nominations at the next Committee meeting and discuss nominations for the Presidential award and the Medal of Justice Award.
Board of Governors Terms ‐‐ The Committee discussed Board terms. The recommendation to consider amending SCR 81 to allow a Board member to remain on the Board if he/she is elected as vice president in the 8th year on the Board, thus allowing him/her to serve as president in year 10. Annual Meeting ‐‐ The Committee was asked to review the annual meeting sponsorship list and to assist in soliciting sponsors. The Committee also determined that Board members should be reimbursed for 3 nights of lodging at the annual meeting (instead of 2 nights) due to the location of the meeting. Memorials – The Committee asked that the Nevada Lawyer run a page on an annual basis noting all those who passed away in the year.
FY 2013 – 2018 Strategic Plan
A Five-Year Vision Adopted by the State Bar of Nevada’s Board
of Governors
2
Our Mission is to govern the legal profession, to serve our members, and to protect the public interest.
Our Goals are...
• to govern the legal profession in the State of Nevada, subject to the approval of the Supreme Court;
• to aid in the advance of the science of jurisprudence and in the improvement of the administration of justice;
• to promote reform in the law and in judicial procedure; • to uphold and elevate the standard of honor, integrity, and courtesy in the legal
profession; • to encourage higher and better education for membership in the profession; • to promote a spirit of cordiality and true friendship among members of the Bar; and • to manage the business of the State Bar in a prudent manner.
The Strategic Priorities outlined in this 5-Year plan reflect the commitment the State Bar of Nevada’s Board of Governors has made to carry forward this mission and its related goals.
MISSION OF THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA
3
Support attorneys working in Nevada seeking to achieve and uphold the uppermost professional, ethical and civil conduct
Promote and, when necessary, enforce the highest ethical conduct of Nevada Lawyers
Support lawyers in transition
Inform and educate Nevada attorneys on professionalism
and ethics
• Provide a timely system for addressing and/or resolving complaints about lawyers
• Develop and support systems that address issues in the unauthorized practice of law
• Continue to develop and maintain programs that assist lawyers in their practice
• Establish lines of communication with law enforcement and other entities regarding issues of attorney misconduct
• Engage and assist newly admitted lawyers
• Assist lawyers leaving the practice of law
• Expand the Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers program
• Identify continuing education needs of Nevada lawyers and respond to their needs
• Assess issues and provide programs and services that inform Nevada lawyers on the Rules of Professional conduct
STRATEGIC PRIORITY
4
Provide a foundation of support to Nevada attorneys to ensure that they maintain the highest standards of competency, technical skills and ethics
Ensure lawyers admitted to practice in Nevada have met educational, ethical
and admission requirements
Provide tools and resources to support accessible continuing education for Nevada
attorneys
Provide effective and timely information to
Nevada lawyers
• Support the Board of Bar Examiners and its subcommittees
• Continue to evaluate character and fitness and other admission requirements and standards
• Continue to strictly interpret and comply with Nevada Supreme Court Rules regarding admissions
• Evaluate and respond to trends and critical issues affecting bar admissions
• Develop a menu of CLE programs that are affordable, innovative and accessible
• Access and provide practice management tools that will serve as resources for attorneys
• Collaborate and partner with other legal education providers to expand the scope of state bar programs
• Publish Nevada Lawyer and deliver content in various formats
• Utilize social media, where appropriate, to provide communications across various platforms
Maintain active guidance and support to sections • Conduct programs on the business of managing sections • Encourage collaboration between sections • Develop and implement strategies and programs to encourage member participation
STRATEGIC PRIORITY
5
Provide a foundation of support to the legal community
Advance the science of jurisprudence, reform of
the law and judicial procedure
Collaborate and enhance relationships with other
entities
Facilitate and support diversity initiatives
• Collaborate with the courts to address issues of underrepresented public
• Continuously evaluate State Bar publishing program
• Support and participate in programs offered by affiliate bars and law related organizations
• Develop programs for Nevada attorneys and other professionals with common interests
• Encourage and support State Bar and law school programs that encourage diversity
Educate and inform the public about lawyer’s professional standards
• Promote to the public how to find a lawyer and promote the lawyer referral service
• Provide a clearinghouse of consumer information
Promote pride in the profession through education of the public
• Inform and educate the public about lawyer's professionalism standards through various media outlets
• Reach the public through law related education programs for all ages
• Identify areas that impact the public and provide information
STRATEGIC PRIORITY
6
Provide for effective operations for resource management, policy and planning
Develop human resources strengths among
volunteers and professional staff
Draw from mandates, professional expectations and community needs to
develop plans that support long-range thinking and
ensure continuity
Implement state-of-the-art solutions using
technology
• Encourage and support continuing education for staff
• Continue to develop and promote professional and educational resources for volunteers
• Identify and pursue methods to manage bar operations and programs efficiently
• Support client protection programs through continued funding, policy development and information dissemination
• Access and utilize social media when appropriate
• Continuously assess bar operations and the use of technology
Lessen the burden of member compliance by identifying more efficient processes
• Evaluate mandates, process and procedures for member compliance to mandatory reporting
Support access to justice
Promote and support pro bono initiatives Support court efforts to reduce costs and streamline processes for lawyers and the
public
• Support the Access to Justice Commission
• Continue to encourage lawyer's pro bono service to enhance the culture of service