Against All Odds - BICSI · Against All Odds: Launching the Largest PON Installation in the Midwest Chip Chapman, RCDD Integrated Building Systems Martin McMurray, RCDD, OSP

Against All Odds:Launching the Largest PON Installation in the Midwest

Chip Chapman, RCDDIntegrated Building Systems

Martin McMurray, RCDD, OSPIntegrated Building Systems

Get on the design team

Arena District, Columbus, Ohio

Traditional LAN vs. POL (GPON)

Traditional LAN Optical LAN

Why Passive Optical LAN?

Scale and Reach

Singlemode

Migration

Easy MACs

20km/12.5mi

One Time

Every Year

Cable Tray, Conduit, and Pathways

Sleeving, Coring, and Fire Stopping

Unknown Bandwidth Capacity

Only upgrade users that need it

Can save 8-10 minutes per MAC

No 300m / 90+10m limitations

~40-60%CapEx

~50-75%OpEx

Construction

Reduced Costs

Technically Future Proof

Passive Optical LAN: Total Cost of Ownership Savings

Expense 250 Users 500 Users 1000 Users Campus 5000 Users

Campus 10,000 Users

TCO 32% 46% 57% 68% 68%

CapEx 31% 41% 48% 55% 55%

OpEx 40% 50% 65% 70% 70%

• Power 48% 61% 68% 75% 75%

• Cooling 48% 61% 68% 75% 75%

Timing is everything

Key decision points

• Value engineering• Real estate and facilities under the CIO• Single mode fiber• Interviews and site visits

“I don’t want this to be a resume-changing event.”

—VP of Enterprise Architecture

Key support

Results?

GPON Layout

GPON Equipment

Floor Zones

OLT and FDDH

ONT Deployment

Desktop Users Interface

Lessons Learned