Africa RISING Mali Team Achievements until 2013 Tom van Mourik (ICRISAT) Africa RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Bamako, Mali, 3-4 February 2014
Dec 21, 2014
Africa RISING Mali Team Achievements until 2013
Tom van Mourik (ICRISAT)Africa RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting,
Bamako, Mali, 3-4 February 2014
Africa RISING partners and activities Synergies with other ongoing projects Africa RISING achievements and ongoing activities
in 2013 Exchange visit conclusions and suggestions Conclusions and remarks
Presentation Outline
Focus on (1) Sustainable intensification (2) Farm household scaleInteractions with other scales acknowledged and studied i.e community, landscape, watershed etc.
Stepwise progress towards SI
Farm typologies
Platforms, co-learning
Critical entry points
Conceptual framework
Improving vegetable production and processing (USAID, AVRDC)
FARMSEM seed enterprise project on dryland crops (USAID, ICRISAT)
Agro-ecological intensification project (McKnight Foundation, WUR, IER, ICRISAT, AMEDD)
Dryland Systems and WLE CGIAR research program(ICRISAT, ICRAF, ILRI, IWMI, Bioversity)
CORAF project on crop livestock integration (IER)
Synergies with other initiatives
Four Research Outputs (RO’s):1: Situation Analysis and Program-wide Synthesis (IFPRI, WUR and partners)2: Integrated Systems Improvement (CGIAR, AVRDC, WUR, national partners)3: Scaling and Delivery of Integrated Innovation (idem) 4: Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation (IFPRI with partners)
Activities in 2013 workplan (may 2013, project started in June 2013)1.1 Community mobilization & establishing platforms2.7 Household nutrition 2.8 Sustainable NRM and fodder2.9 Farm and field productivity
Africa RISING outputs and activities
Development domains & villages selected Basic farm HH characteristics collected in 7 villages
RO1 Achievements & activities 2013
Diagnostic / planning meetings all AR villages Platforms established in 4 villages
Yorobougoula (NRM, local conventions)Nampossela (Farm & field productivity, McKnight)Sirakele & Mpessoba (nutrition)Exchange visit West Africa in Mali, 21-24 Nov. 2013)
Community mobilisation & platforms (1)
Fencing and wells constructed in 3 villages and existing sites identified in 2 villages (ICRISAT, ICRAF)
Physical platforms for experimentation Fruit tree establishment trials Off-season irrigated vegetable / seed production
Community mobilisation & platforms (2)
Study on level of interaction and influence of different stakeholders in IP Yorobougoula
Lead farmer generally interacts and informs 5 other farmers outside IP
Analyses for mapping of networking and interaction among stakeholders on-going
Community mobilisation & platforms (3)
HIGH
Ones that can make difference
5
3
2
1
1 2 4 5
HIGH
Level of interest
Level of influence
LOW
Guanan-ton
Ass. Jeunes
Chikolo-ton
Coop eleveurs
CP miel
Jigiya-ton
CMDT AV
CP- coton Bio
LOW
Benkadi-ton
Faso-Jguiya
Sabali-tonCP volaille
Association chasseurs
Chikolo-ton
Household nutrition survey completed (AVRDC) Nutrition field schools implemented 2 villages (AVRDC, ICRISAT)
8 training modules developed in French & Bambara and tested with participantsNutrition field schools linked to nutritious vegetable and field crop trials and seed salesTraining video produced on the preparation of enriched porridge
Household nutrition (1)
Household nutrition (2)
Nutrition status Boys Girls 6-23 months
24-59 months
Severe / moderate malnutrition
6% 10% 15% 1%
Risk of malnutrition
17% 21% 37% 11%
Normal 77% 69% 45% 88%
Nutritional status of ~1300 children between 6 months and 5 years assessed
Girls and especially youngest group high rates of poor nutrition status
Survey and analyses of feed resources, FEAST (ILRI, AMEDD), Sources of income
Sustainable NRM & fodder (1)
Agriculture59%
Livestock25%
Remittance6%
Farm Labour
4%
Commerce3%
Arboriculture2%
Agriculture67%
Livestock16%
Remit-tance8%
Farm Labour
1%
Commerce7%
Bougouni Koutiala
Sustainable NRM & fodder (2)
January
Febru
ary
March
April May
Ju
neJuly
August
Septem
ber
October
November
December
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Available Feed Resources
Concentrates Crop residues GrazingGreen forage Legume residues OthersCereal residues Rainfall Pattern
Avai
labl
ity
January
Febru
ary
March
April May
Ju
neJuly
August
Septem
ber
October
November
December
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Available Feed Resources
Concentrates Grazing Green forage Legume residues Others Cereal residuesRainfall Pattern
Avai
labl
ity
Bougouni Koutiala
Koutiala more availability of cereal residues and concentrates Bougouni, more availability of green forage and grazing
Participatory land use mapping Biomass assessment, cropped /non-cropped land
(ICRISAT, AMEDD, MoBioM, WUR)
RO2 Sustainable NRM & fodder (3)
Farm & field productivity (1)Field crop trials in Bougouni area
Trial type Planned Planted Harvested Analysed
Sorghum / cowpea intercrop
20 18 15 11
Cowpea 31 28 25 21
Soybean 20 20 17 14
Groundnut 12 12 12 Not yet analysed
Sorghum-Cowpea intercrop Sorghum: No
treatment effect (poor germination, brd damage)
Cowpea fodder yields:
inter-row not significantly different from pure crop, in-row significantly lower. Dunanfana significantly higher fodder yield than local.
Cowpea No significant effect
of Neem insecticide Farmers expressed
preference for Wilibali, despite similar yields to local variety
white grain, early maturation much appreciated
a
aa a
bb
a
a
bb b b
Soybean intensification trials Soybean yields
showed no significant treatment effects.
Farmers interested in soybean
New crop, farmers don’t know what to do with soybean
Request for training on soybean processing/preparation
Control + Compost + Innoculum + Compost+ Innoculum
Farm & field productivity (2)Field crop trials Koutiala area 2013 (total ~200 trials)
Trial type Planned Harvested For analysis
Sorghum mechan-microdos 10 8 8Sorghum intensification 31 28 21Maize intensification 45 45 45
Cowpea intensification 41 38 38
Groundnut/roselle intercrop 12 12 12
Soyabean intensification 39 30 30Sorghum/cowpea intercrop 5 5 5Maize/cowpea intercrop 32 32 32
MaizeT1 : local variety, no fertilizer T2 : local variety, manure 9t/ha +150 kg urea, 100 kg complex 15-15-15T3 : hybrid maize « Bondofa », no fertilizerT4 : hybrid maize « Bondofa », manure 9t/ha, 150 kg urea, 100 kg complex 15-15-15
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
grai
n yi
eld
(kg/
ha)
grain yield of the control kg/ha
control=local no fert hybrid no fert local+fert hybrid+fert
T1 : local variety, no fertilizer ;T2 : local variety, manure 9t/ha +DAP 75 kg/haT3 : hybrid sorghum « Pablo », no fertilizerT4 : hybrid sorghum « Pablo, manure 9t/ha, DAP 75 kg/ha
Sorghum
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 16000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
"control=local no fert" local+fert hybrid no fert hybrid+fert
grain yield of the control (kg/ha)
grai
n yi
eld
(kg/
ha)
CowpeaT1 : ‘wulibali’ cowpea, no fertilizationT2 : ‘wulibali’ cowpea, P 20kg/haT3 : ‘Dunanfana cowpea, no fertilizationT4 : ‘Dunanfana cowpea, P 20 kg/ha
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
200400600800
1000120014001600
control=wulibali no fert 20kgP/ha
control grain yield (kg/ha)
grai
n yi
eld
(kg/
ha)
02000
40006000
800010000
1200014000
1600018000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
control=dunanfana no fert 20 kgP/ha
control fodder yield (kg/ha)
fodd
er y
ield
(kg/
ha)
T1 T2
T3 T4
SoybeanT1 : no fertilizer , no inoculum ;T2 : manure 4t/ha, P 20 kg/ha, no inoculumT3 : no fertilizer, inoculumT4 : manure 4t/ha, P 20 kg/ha, inoculum
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 14000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
control=no inoculum no fert no inoculum+fertinoculum no fert Linear (inoculum no fert)inoculum+fert
control- grain yield (kg/ha)
grai
n yi
eld
(kg/
ha)
Promising results, potential of 100 USD/ha more net profit than the local practice with about 20 USD /ha investment (hybrid seed, fertiliser, disk)
Participatory agro-economical analyses of mechanised microdosing trials with sorghum
Strategic sheep feeding trials initiated with cowpea/groundnut hay and maize bran
3 feed treatments:
600g legume hay/day
900g legume hay/day
600g legume hay & 400 g maize bran /day
Vaccinations and salt lick blocks standard treatment for all
Distribution & viewings of videos related to sustainable intensification options performed in all AR villages
(~100 DVDs distributed, > 10,000 farmers exposed)
Preliminary study performed on what information is retained and what farmers do with the information (unsupervised experimentation and innovation)
RO3 Scaling approaches
Capacity building (1)Training title Men Women total
Nutrition field schools (8 modules, AVRDC, ICRISAT) 14 646 660
Vegetable processing, conservation and storage (AVRDC)
23 36 59
Mechanised microdosing technique & trial establishment (ICRISAT)
7 1 8
Use of media for large scale farmer training (ICRISAT) 4 2 6
Grafting and planting practices for improved fruit trees (ICRAF)
144
Establishment of rural resource center (ICRAF) 25
Introduction to monitoring and evaluation (IFPRI, ICRISAT)
15 3 18
Integration, integration & integration!! Organisations, technologies, system components,
Harmonizing data collection, sharing and reporting
Describe where activities fit into the farming system and describe links to other activities
Flexibility partnerships and consultations where necessary
Exchange visit conclusions and suggestions from participants
Africa Research in Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation
africa-rising.net
Thank you / merci!