Top Banner
Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010
22

Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

Dec 15, 2015

Download

Documents

Berenice Harmes
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

Affirmative Action–Or Not

Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR • 2010

Page 2: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

2

AA Fishing

Page 3: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

3

20% good fish $5/lb

30% mediocre fish $2/lb

50% worthless fish

Page 4: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

4

20% good fish $5/lb

30% mediocre fish $2/lb

50% worthless fish

Lake 2

AA Fishing

Page 5: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

5

Lake 1

Lake 3

Lake 2

AA Fishing

Page 6: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

6

Conclusions From the Fish Story

• We want good fish regardless of which lake they come from.

• If we concentrate on one lake only, we will eventually run out of good fish and have to settle for mediocre or bad fish.

• We are willing to spend money to pursue good fish in other lakes.

• It makes no sense to wait for the good fish in other lakes to swim to us.

• We won’t be satisfied with our catch from the smaller lakes until we catch them in proportion to their availability.

Page 7: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

7

Affirmative Action in Action

Affirmative Action’s First Victim> Ed Stevens

Page 8: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

8

Affirmative Action in Action

• Rickey wanted the most talented players regardless of where they came from.

• By concentrating on white players only, mediocre and bad players were filling out the rosters.

• The Dodgers spent money sending scouts into the Negro Leagues to find the most talented players.

• The Dodgers didn’t wait for African-American players to knock down the doors demanding equal treatment.

• Robinson was the first, but not the only, good fish landed by the Dodgers from the African-American pool.

Page 9: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

9

Bertrand and Mullainathan Study

• 5,000 resumes mailed for entry-level jobs in Boston and Chicago.

• Resumes designed to be a good fit or poor fit for job.

Page 10: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

10

• Resumes also designed to reflect gender of applicant.

Bertrand and Mullainathan Study

7.70%

8.60%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

9.00%

10.00%

11.00%

% Receiving

Call Backs

Male Female

Page 11: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

11

Male

1. Brad, Jay,

Matthew, Todd

2. Tyrone, Leroy,

Jamal, Rasheed

Bertrand and Mullainathan Study

• One other name manipulation:

Female

1. Kristen, Laurie,

Meredith, Jill

2. Ebony, Lakisha,

Keisha, Latoya

Page 12: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

12

Bertrand and Mullainathan Study

10.10%

6.70%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

9.00%

10.00%

11.00%

% Receiving

Call Backs

White African-American

Page 13: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

13

8.80%

11.31%

6.41%6.99%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

9.00%

10.00%

11.00%

% Receiving

Call Backs

White African-American

Poor Fit Good Fit

Bertrand and Mullainathan Study

Page 14: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

14

Affirmative Action Summary

• The fish story demonstrated what affirmative action is really about. It’s about noticing underutilization and proactively addressing it.

• The baseball story demonstrated that affirmative action done well leads to better organizational performance.

• The Bertrand and Mullainathan study demonstrated that underutilization still happens, even across the labor market.

• So far in our discussion, the government hasn’t forced anyone to engage in affirmative action.

Page 15: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

15

What Is Affirmative Action?

• Attempt to ensure that the organization is attracting and selecting the best talent from every available source.

• Only mandated by law for:> Federal contractors and subcontractors with 50 or

more employees and contracts of at least $50,000.• Required by Executive Order 11246.

> Organizations found guilty of illegal discrimination.> For everyone else, it’s just a good idea.

Page 16: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

16

• Utilization analysis:> Are there any pools that are not being tapped?> Compare your workforce to the relevant labor force.

• Establish goals and timetables for tapping underutilized pools.> Goals should match availability in the relevant labor

force.> Timetables should consider anticipated growth and

typical turnover rates.

• Develop plans to reduce underutilization:> Recruit in nontraditional areas.> Examples….

What Is Affirmative Action?

Page 17: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

17

Recruiting in Nontraditional Areas

• SAS Institute, Inc.> Family-friendly work environment.

• Raytheon> Finding new untapped pools.

• Sempra Energy> Building social networks.

• Goldman Sachs> Educating women in underdeveloped nations.> LEAD program.

Page 18: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

18

• Utilization analysis:> Are there any pools that are not being tapped?> Compare your workforce to the relevant labor force.

• Establish goals and timetables for tapping underutilized pools:> Goals should match availability in the relevant labor

force.> Timetables should consider anticipated growth and

typical turnover rates.

• Develop plans to reduce underutilization:> Recruit in nontraditional areas.> Selection practices that reduce subjectivity.> Examples….

What Is Affirmative Action?

Page 19: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

19

• Changing Selection Practices> Home Depot:

• Changes driven by growth and class-action lawsuits.

• Job Preference Program (JPP) automated the selection process.

• Number of female managers increased by 30 percent.

• Number of minority managers increased by 28 percent.

Selection Practices that Reduce Subjectivity

Page 20: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

20

1. Utilization analysis:1. Are there any pools that are not being tapped?

2. Compare your workforce to the relevant labor force.

2. Establish goals and timetables for tapping underutilized pools:1. Goals should match availability in the relevant labor

force.

2. Timetables should consider anticipated growth and typical turnover rates.

3. Develop plans to reduce underutilization:1. Recruit in nontraditional areas.

2. Selection practices that reduce subjectivity.

4. Monitor progress.

What Is Affirmative Action?

Page 21: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

©SHRM 2010

21

What Affirmative Action Is Not

• Not a government mandate for many employers.• Not reverse discrimination.

> Court rulings have placed limits on affirmative action programs:

• Affirmative action plans must be temporary.• The purpose must be to correct underutilization.• The plan may not completely ban the hiring/promotion of

majority members.• The plan may not cause the termination of majority members.• Preferences may only be given to qualified minority

members..

• Not quotas.> Specifically forbidden.

• Not diversity for the sake of diversity.> Evidence is not clear.

Page 22: Affirmative Action–Or Not Thomas A. Timmerman, Ph.D., SPHR 2010.

Wrap-Up

• What Affirmative Action IS:> An attempt by an organization to actively recruit and

select talented employees from traditionally undertapped pools.

• What Affirmative Action IS NOT:> A government mandate that forces organizations to

hire unqualified employees.

©SHRM 2010

22