AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Sent: 8/9/2009 3:31:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time Subj: Affidavit of Prejudice v. Kathleen Gearin_RICO ChargesFile 62cv09-1163

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF RAMSEY 2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

File No. 62-cv09-1163 Case Type: Other Civil and Criminal

AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE RE: Chief Judge 2nd Judicial District KATHLEEN GEARIN_RICO CHARGES DTD. SUN.9AUG09

To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property described in the Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E.

Olson 651-2202, published 18Mar09 MapleWood Review www.review-news.com

and all Candidates for Political Offices www.sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com ******************************************************************************

STATE OF MINNESOTA, All Agencies,County of Ramsey,All Agencies, City of St.Paul,MN,All Agencies

Page 3 of 11

Sunday, August 09, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor,

State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court

Administrator,St.Paul Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry ET

AL. www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling

John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter et al in

their Official Capacity‘s, Ind ividually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg

Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66

Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NWS2d,562 Plaintiffs

V. 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43

St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist

Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 96 Blogs www.sharonanderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and

3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice A.Peterson. http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com

Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169

Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Theft Trespass Larceny RICO ***************************************************************

TO THE ABOVE NAMED PLAINTIFF’S AND THEIR ATTORNEYS LORI SWANSON,STATE CAPITOL,SUSAN GAERTNER,JOHN CHOI,AT

THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICES , Legal Notice to Sheriff Bob Fletcher

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

State of Minnesota ) )ss County of Ramsey )

VA Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson first duly sworn on the

Graves of Tenants in Common, Murder of 2nd Husband James R. Anderson and ECF165913-Pacer 1299 , appears to be a Criminal Defendant in the Property

Taxaction re: 62cv09-1163 and that Sharon has good reasons,criminal probable cause to believe and does believe and so states, that because of bias and prejudice

on the part of Judge Kathleen Gearin, Chief Judge 2nd Jud. Dist. apparantly one of the Judges in the above named Court, a fair trial and or hearing

cannot result, and therefore Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson makes

this Affidavit to disqualify said Judge Kathleen Gearin for ALL PURPOSES.

Sharon Anderson v. Kathleen Gearin - Google Search Impeachments were brought

Page 4 of 11


against Kathleen Gearin for her Conspired Coverup of the following Property Ownership 1058 Summit,448 Desnoyer,325 N. Wilder a 6 unit, given Tax breaks for

20 years,2194 Marshall, Buck Lake, Gun Lake, Gull Lake

Propertys for the past 20 years. /s/ Sharon Scarrella Anderson ECF 165913-sa1299

Sharon will Challenge Jurisdiction/Authority and will only appear by Fax or Telephone Conference on the 20thDay of Aug. before Bias Judge

John VandeNorth.

Motions by county Attorney Jean Stepan are techinally false as Stepan has willfully failed to read Sharon's Motions now Attached and http://taxthemax.blogspot.com

admitted to having Homestead Classification since 1992, (17 yrs), Ex. http://sharon4privateattornygeneral.blogspot.com pg 8 Paid the full property taxes of $949.86, for 2008. Challenge that Title 18 USC 1001 False

charges. By Mark Oswald to “take” HS Credit, INTENT

It is the intent of this fiduciary to challenge the RICO "BAD BEHAVIOR"

of current Judge Kathleen Gearin for the past 24 years in her apparent Lesbian

Bias in a "Patterened Enterprise" of Bogus Court Orders contrary to

42 USC 3631 to cause Death,Disability,Disparagment of Titles in a RICO Pattern to malign,injure,terrorize Sharon and her Family or any Pro Se Litigant.

Sharon Anderson v. Kathleen Gearin - Google Search Skip to content

Criminal Section Statutes Enforced

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the Unites States, (or because of his/her having exercised the

Page 5 of 11


� Press Releases

same). Unlike most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming a crime. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing, 42 U.S.C. § 3631. Section 3631 of Title 42 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with, or attempt to injure, intimidate, or interfere with, any person's housing rights because of that person's race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. Among those housing rights enumerated in the statute are: 1) the sale, purchase, or renting of a dwelling, 2) the occupation of dwelling, 3) the financing of a dwelling, 4) contracting or negotiating for any of the rights enumerated above, and 5) applying for or participating in any service, organizations, or facility relating to the sale or rental of dwellings.

This statute also makes it unlawful to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person who is assisting an individual or class of persons in the exercise of their housing rights. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Damage to Religious Property, 18 imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

For the purpose of Section 242, acts under

Page 6 of 11


� Frequently Asked Questions

� Special Topics � Cases & Briefs � Recruitment &

Employment � Contact Us

Go to the Department of Justice

Privacy Act Statement

Hints...

Feedback Form

Search Civil Rights

"color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Federally Protected Activities, 18 U.S.C. § 245. The portion of Section 245 of Title 18 which is primarily enforced by the Criminal Section makes it unlawful to willfully injure, intimidate or interfere with any person, or to attempt to do so, by force or threat of force, because of that other person's race, color, religion or national origin and because of his/her activity as one of the following:

This statute also prohibits wilful interference, by force or threat of force, with a person because he/she is or was participating in, or aiding or encouraging other persons to participate in any of the benefits or activities listed above without discrimination as to race, color, religion,

Peonage, 18 U.S.C. § 1581. Section 1581 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in "debt servitude," or peonage, which is closely related to involuntary servitude. Section 1581 prohibits using force, the threat of force, or the threat of legal coercion to compel a person to work against his/her will. In addition, the victim's involuntary servitude must be tied to the payment of a debt.

Page 7 of 11


Involuntary Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1584. Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, that is, a condition of compulsory service or labor against his/her will. A Section 1584 conviction requires that the victim be held against his/her will by actual force, threats of force, or threats of legal coercion. Section 1584 also prohibits compelling a person to work against his/her will by creating a "climate of fear" through the use of force, the threat of force, or the threat of legal coercion [i.e., If you don't work, I'll call the immigration officials.] which is sufficient to compel service against a person's will.

Unlawful Conduct with Respect to Documents in Furtherance of Trafficking, Peonage, Slavery, Involuntary Servitude, or Forced Labor, 18 U.S.C. § 1592. Section 1592 makes it illegal to seize documents in order to force others to work. By expanding its coverage to false documents as well as official documents, § 1592 recognizes that victims are often immobilized by the withholding of whatever documents they possess, even if the documents are forged or fraudulent. Section 1592 expands the scope of federal trafficking statutes to reach those who prey on the vulnerabilities of immigrant victims by controlling their papers.

Additional Provisions Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act

Mandatory Restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 1593

Attempt and Forfeiture, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1594(a) and (b)

Private Right of Action, 18 U.S.C. § 1595

Intimidation of Voters, 18 U.S.C. § 594 Section 594 makes it illegal to use intimidation, threats, or coercion, or attempt to use any of these means, to interfere with the right of another to vote or vote as the individual chooses, or to cause the individual to vote or not vote for any particular

Page 8 of 11


Court File 62cv09-1163 apparently is an Administrative without Filing Fees, or levy funds absent a prior fully disclosed proof of lawful claim or judicial due

process through judicial courts with proper jurisdiction. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp. 337 US 682 (1949) Kelo Decision Stands

3. As to the Allegations “taken” in the form of Summary Judgment,

published Falsely in the Maplewood Review, www.review-news.com 18Mar09 pg.53 Sharon Anderson 697 Surrey Ave. 32.29.22.41.0053 Lyman Dayton Add. Lot

5 Blk 46 2008 $2,499.43 without proper citation of any statute,ordinance,rule,or regulation which Defendants alleged to have violated contrary to Crim Rules , as to the required specificity of an apparent crimial accusation of “not paying taxes” US

v. Cruikshank,92 US 542 at 558 (1876)

COUNT I CONSPIRACY Title 18 s. 241,242 Between April 2006 up to and including the present The Stalking of Sharon

by shutting off Water www.sharonanderson.org, Stalking causing Fracutured Ankle, Sharon ran for State Ag from her Wheel Chair, Plaintiffs,

JUDGE KATHLEEN GEARIN,Lantry,Moore,Coleman,Kessler,Essling, did unlawfully combine,conspire,confederate and agree to Steal Sharons Car, Trailer, Realestate

http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com and obstruct justice in connection with the Homicide of Cpl James R. Anderson www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com starting

1996, when Sharon paid the property taxes on her Cabin in Itasca Co. legally in the Corporation of Anderson+Advocates, by altering and orchestrating the crime

scene, disposing of,altering and planting evidence, commitments to Brainard for 1 year by the SCAP Panel Gearin and Smith, lying to law enforcement authorities and others

about the true circumstances surrounding Sharons RealEstate, Disabilitys,Disparagment of Title and Death of Tenants in Common and Sharons

2nd Husband. http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com

years, Heinous Hardship of taking Commerce Rights to drive to get grocerys,

medical care and the Aitkin,Itaska Cabins. “taken under color of corrupt Judges”

candidate for federal office.

National Voter Registration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-10(1) Section 1973gg-10(1) of Title 42 criminalizes, in a federal election, to intimidate, threaten, or coerce a prospective registrant or voter from registering to vote, voting, or attempting to register or vote, or for urging another to register or vote.

Return to the Criminal Section Home Page

Updated July 25, 2008

Page 9 of 11


AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMIA PAUPERIOUS Faxed>Mon.30Mar09 to [email protected] 651-266-8263

ON SHARONS BLOGS, PDF FILES: BY E-COMMERCE: E-MAIL

STATE OF MINNESOTA ET AL V. 697 SURREY ET AL NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FILE: 62-cv09-1163

Please take legal notice, pending Full Disclosure, Tickets,Warrants,

Constitionality, Demand for Grand Jury Indictments against the Plaintiffs QUESTIONS PRESENTED :

Whether a state violates the dormant Commerce Clause by providing an exemption of Homestead Credits, Old House Credits, Disabled, Senior Credits, re:

MN Const. Art.X to the citizenry, yet Denial to a Political Candidate for State Attorney General, Judge,State Rep64a ?

/s/ Sharon Anderson Private Attorney General, Attorney Pro Se_InFact will Move the Jurisdiction/Authority of the Court for Dismissal, Recover of

Car,Trailer,Personal Propertys, Attorney Fees $240.00 pr hour, WHEREFORE

all Sharon Scarrella Anderson dba Church of Justice Reform, Rose of Sharon Ministrys, Anderson+Advocates, “taken” without Just Compensation, under color

of Authority, by the Corrupt Judiciary. Dated: Wed. 1Apr09 /s/ Sharon Anderson ECF

Fourth Amendment is a personal right and an individual must invoke its

protections. Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83, 88 (1998). An individual may invoke the protection of the Fourth Amendment by showing "that he personally has an

expectation of privacy in the place searched, and that his expectation is reasonable;

i.e., one that has 'a source outside of the Fourth Amendment, either by reference to concepts of real or personal property law or to understandings that are recognized

and permitted by society.'" Carter, 525 U.S. at 88 (quoting Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 n.12 (1978)). Thus, the determination of whether B.R.K. can invoke the protections of the Fourth Amendment involves a two-step analysis. First, we

must determine whether B.R.K. exhibited an actual subjective expectation of privacy in the home and, second, whether that expectation is reasonable. See Katz,

389 U.S. at 361 (Harlan, J., concurring). 19(b) The Minnesota Supreme Court recognized the tort of invasion of

privacy in Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 582 N.W.2d 231, 235 (Minn. 1998): “The right to privacy exists in the common law of Minnesota, including causes of action

in tort for intrusion upon seclusion, appropriation, and publication of private facts.”

19(c) State v. Larsen, 2002.MN.0001476: The right to be left alone—the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. To protect that

right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the

Fourth Amendment. Id. at 478 (Brandeis, J., dissenting).

Concerns for this essential element of our personal freedom are reflected in the Fourth Amendment and art. I, § 10 of the Minnesota Constitution protecting the

"right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against

unreasonable searches and seizures." U.S. Const. amend. IV; see Minn. Const.

Page 10 of 11


REMEDY SOUGHT 21. Determination by the St. Paul Mayor and City Council, and that

Sharon Anderson does not owe the amount claimed by the DSI Badge 322 Joel Essling

Approximately $900.00 22. Return to Sharon Scarrella Anderso Car 91 Chev replacement

value $30 thous, Trailer $10 thous, Contents over $10 thousand, plus Damage to Driveway, Fence, over 20 thous, Punatitive, Compensatory,Tort Damages

$500,000.00 for each and every occurance. /s/ Sharon Anderson Disclaimer

Word Program by Beale is used for Original and Educational Purposes.

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010

www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |

FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues,

MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption

3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial

journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based

solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.

Page 11 of 11


AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge

Real Estate

city of st

judges kathleen gearin

county commissioners

paul mayor chris

chief judge

kathy wuorinen

larry dease

larry cohen et