AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) SS. CITY OF LYNCHBURG ) 1. My name is Nathan E. Hottle. I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA Inc. (AREVA) and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit. 2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA to determine whether certain AREVA information is proprietary. I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA to ensure the proper application of these criteria. 3. I am familiar with the AREVA information contained in the following document: "GAIA Mechanical Design \apical Report Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting Slides," referred to herein as "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA as "- proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA Inc. for the control and \ protection of proprietary and confidential information. 4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature · and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA and not made available to the public. Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential. 5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be . withheld from public disclosure. The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 1 O CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is
38
Embed
AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) CITY OF … · GAIA Fuel Assembly Key Attributes ~ Top Nozzle ~ Relaxed HMP™ Top Grid ~ Intermediate GAIA Mixer (IGM) (3) ~ MS® Fuel Rod w
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
AFFIDAVIT
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) ) SS.
CITY OF LYNCHBURG )
1. My name is Nathan E. Hottle. I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA
Inc. (AREVA) and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.
2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA to determine whether certain
AREVA information is proprietary. I am familiar with the policies established by
AREVA to ensure the proper application of these criteria.
3. I am familiar with the AREVA information contained in the following document:
"GAIA Mechanical Design \apical Report Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting Slides," referred to
herein as "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA as "-
proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA Inc. for the control and \
protection of proprietary and confidential information.
4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature
· and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA and not made available to the
public. Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the
kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be .
withheld from public disclosure. The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in
accordance with 1 O CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is
requested qualifies under 1 O CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial
information."
6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA to determine whether
information should be classified as proprietary:
(a) The information reveals details of AREVA's research and development plans
and programs or their results.
(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the ·competitor to
significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce,
or market a similar product or service. r
(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a
process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a ,.
competitive advantage for AREVA.
(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process,
methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a
competitive advantage for AREVA in product optimization or marketability.
(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA, would be
helpful to competitors to AREVA, and would likely cause substantial harm to
the competitive position of AREVA.
The information in this Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in
paragraphs 6(a), 6(c) and 6(d) above.
7. In accordance with AREVA's policies governing the protection and control of J
information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a
limited basis, to others outside AREVA only as required and under suitable agreement providing
for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
8. AREVA policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or
area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.
9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,
information, and belief.
SUBSCRIBED before me this 2J)fb
day of f}pyy l , 2016.
Sherry L. McFaden NOTARY PUBLIC, COMMONWEAL TH OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 10/31/18 Reg.# 7079129
VQPs, contracts RLBLOCA Structural Response Q-12 Structural ARCADIA Reactor I AREA-ARCADIA Rod to Externally Applied Material Analysis System Ejection Accident Dynamic Excitations
'"= L
-
GAIA without ANP-10341 ANP-10342 I
~dvanced C&M• GAIA GAIA !'
CHF Correlation Mechanical Design
~
ANP-10323 I GAU LEO ANP-10339
GAIAwith ANP-10323 I ARITA Methodology
I GALILEO Update
~dvanced c&M!
-Product BAW-10192 Suppl ANP-10337
10CfRS0.46c ANP-10336 BWNT LOCA-Evaluation
BAW-10227, MS Addendum
BWR LOCA model changes Improvements Z4B Fuel Channel Model for Once Through Supplement
PWR Fuel Assembly I or Irradiation Program Steam Generator Plants Structural Response BAW·2241 Revision EMF-93-177, Rev 1, --- ... New Fluence
A GAIA Mechanical Design Topical Report- Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting, April 27, 2016 23 AREVA
Chapter 1 lntroductio'n and summary
_...Report purpose and ,scope <> Provide a generic basis for the GAIA fuel assembly design
for incorporation by reference into plant licensing bases
(; Report scope is consistent with recent generic mechanical design topical reports from AREVA and other fuel vendors (e.g., BAW-10239PA-Advanced Mark-BW, ANP-10285P - U.S. EPR)
<>Topical report will be independent of AREVA's generic PWR mechanical design criteria report (EMF-92-116PA)
_...Report overview and summary
A GAIA Mechanical Design Topical Report- Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting , April 27, 2016 24 AR EVA.
Chapter 2 (1/2) Regulatory requirements
~Tabulation of·SRP 4.2 acceptance criteria <>Set of ap,,plicable criteria defines the regulatory scope of
the topical report
<) Roadmap to topical report section that demonstrates how criteria are met
~GAIA-specific criteri~ to deinonstrate conformance with SRP criteria are provided in Chapter 4, Design Evaluation. ·
A GAIA Mechanical Design Topical Report- Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting , April 27, 2016 25 AREVA
Chapter 2 (2/2) Regulatory requirements
SRP 4.2 criterion Topical report scope
Ai Stress, strain , or loading limits for structural members y
A.ii Strain fatigue y
A.iii Fretting wear y
A.iv Oxidation , hydriding , and crud y
Av Axial growth (rod and assembly) y
A.vi Fuel rod internal pressure y
A.vii Assembly liftoff y
A.viii Control rod reactivity and insertability N
B.i Internal hydridinq y
B.ii Claddinq collapse y
B.iii Overheating of cladding N
B.iv Overheatinq of fue l f2ellets y
B.v Excessive fuel enthalf2Y (RIA) N
B.vi Pellet/cladding interaction (strain) y
B.vii Claddinq burst N
B.viii Mechanical fractu ring (external load) y
C.i Cladding embrittlement N
C.ii Violent expulsion of fuel N
C.iii Generalized claddinq melting N
C.iv - Fuel rod balloon ing N
C.v Structural deformation (external load) y
A GAIA Mechanical Design Topical Report - Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting , April 27 , 2016 26 AREVA
Chapter 3 Design description
~Description of the generic GAIA fuel assembly and component designs
A GAIA Mechanical Design Topical Report- Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting , April 27, 2016 27 AREVA
Chapter 4 (1/3) J
Design evaluation
~Specification of the GAIA mechanical design criteria used to derrionstrate conformance to the SRP acceptance criteria
~Summary of the analyses and tests performed to demonstrate that the generic -GAIA design meets the criteria
<>Analytical methods used in the design evaluations
<>Analyses are based on representative reactor conditions and power histories
<>Plant-specific analyses will confirm that the criteria are met for each fuel reload batch
A GAIA Mechanical Design Topical Report- Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting, April 27, 2016 28 AREVA
'-Chapter 4 (2/3) Design evaluation
~Fuel rod performance analyses <)AREVA is evaluating options for the GAIA demonstration
case
<>Plant-specific fuel rod _analyses will be pe_rformed for ~ach GAIA reload using one of the approved fuel rod performance codes and associated design criteria.
A · GAIA Mechanical Design Topical Report- Tactical Pre-submittal Meeting, April 27, 2016 29 AREVA