Advocacy for Medicaid Expansion in Mississippi A White Paper on Medicaid Expansion Mark Slyter
Advocacy for MedicaidExpansion in MississippiA White Paper on Medicaid Expansion
Mark Slyter
HA 605 H
Introduc
O
The issue
Act (ACA
they rem
receiving
expand e
negotiate
in ACA.
coverage
Medicaid
offsetting
Policy Po
M
stimulate
generate
federal st
as schedu
response
economic
ealth Policy
ction
One of the mo
e of expansio
A) but struck
oved the pro
g federal Me
eligibility. T
ed funding fr
For hospita
e was offset b
d expansion,
g gain in exp
osition on M
Mississippi sh
e the Mississ
partisan opp
timulus alloc
uled in the A
will jeopard
c impact to M
M
ost debated p
on escalated
k down a po
ovision that r
dicaid fundi
The ruling by
rom Medicai
als across the
by $155 billi
are struggli
panded cover
Medicaid Ex
hould draw d
sippi econom
position then
cated for Mi
ACA putting
dize healthca
Mississippi.
P
edicaid Exp
political top
d after the 20
rtion of the l
required stat
ing. States n
y the Court je
id expansion
e nation, the
ion reductio
ing with sign
rage.
xpansion
down the ma
my. If the pr
n alternative
ississippi. P
state econom
are delivery,
Establishin
Page 1 of 27
pansion in M
ics today at
012 U.S. Sup
law related t
te’s to expan
now have the
eopardized t
n to offset sig
estimate wa
n in paymen
nificant paym
aximum fede
oposed ACA
plans should
ayment redu
mies withou
cause signif
ng a federal h
Assignmen
Student
Dat
Mississippi
the state lev
preme Court
to Medicaid.
nd Medicaid
e option of d
the economic
gnificant pay
as $171 billio
nts. States li
ment reducti
eral funding
A Medicaid
d be prompt
uctions for pr
ut a status qu
ficant job lo
healthcare st
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
vel is Medica
upheld the A
. In the Cou
eligibility to
deciding whe
cs for provid
yment reduc
on gain relat
ike Mississip
ons for prov
g available fo
expansion c
tly identified
roviders are
uo option. A
ss and have
timulus optio
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
aid expansio
Affordable C
urt’s decision
o continue
ether or not t
ders that
ctions schedu
ted to expan
ppi opposing
viders withou
or healthcare
ontinues to
d to receive t
moving forw
A delayed
a negative
on for
ocacy
n.
Care
n
to
uled
nded
g
ut the
e to
the
ward
HA 605 H
Mississip
economic
and accep
economy
establish
Mississip
Oppositi
M
Medicaid
uninsured
budgets a
realized.
Exhibit 1Medicaid
Source: The A
is fundin
schedule
ealth Policy
ppi will impr
c impact to M
pt a negative
y. Clearly op
a pro-comm
ppi.
ion to Medi
Mississippi is
d (Exhibit 1)
d need (Exh
and the belie
Leaders op
1: Where thed Expansion
Advisory Board C
g 90 plus pe
d payment r
rove access t
Mississippi.
e economic i
ption two is
merce model
caid Expan
s one of twen
) as of Novem
ibit 2). Thes
ef that many
posing Med
e States Stand(November
ompany (www.ad
ercent of the
eductions (e
P
to care, gene
With no sta
impact or (2
preferred an
to amplify t
sion
nty-one state
mber 2013 a
se states cite
of the provi
dicaid expans
d on 18, 2013)
visory.com)
cost, state b
e.g. Dispropo
Page 2 of 27
erate job cre
atus quo, the
) act and sig
nd the busine
the economic
es that is tak
and joins ma
e Medicaid e
isions in AC
sion argue th
ExhibiImplem
Source: T
budgets will b
ortionate Sha
Assignmen
Student
Dat
ation and ha
e two options
gnificantly en
ess communi
c impact of t
king a positio
any of these s
expansion is
CA to reduce
hat even thou
it 2: Uninsurmentation
The Advisory Boar
be lobbied in
are Hospital
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
ave a signific
s are clear: (
nhance the M
ity should be
the federal s
on of not exp
same states w
unaffordabl
state spendi
ugh the fede
red Populatio
rd Company (www
n other ways
or DSH sup
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
cant positive
(1) failure to
Mississippi
e engaged to
stimulus for
panding
with the high
le for their st
ing will not
eral governm
on Post-ACA
w.advisory.com)
s to reverse
pplemental
ocacy
e
o act
o
hest
tate
be
ment
A
HA 605 H
payments
safety-ne
expansio
oppositio
mentions
The “woo
of the wo
mandate,
included
Other op
impact of
B
appeal to
it is unlik
(Exhibit
Exhibit 3Expansio
Source: The H
ealth Policy
s). This is sp
et hospitals c
n (Haislmaie
on is the unc
s the “woodw
odwork” eff
oodwork” to
, outreach an
in many of t
position fact
f exchanges
Beyond the st
o the affordab
kely any indi
4) – much le
3: Estimated on, 2014-202
Heritage Foundatio
peculative b
continuing to
er & Gonsho
ertainty of fu
work” effect
fect is the im
enroll becau
nd subsidies.
the credible
tors sited are
and econom
tate impact (
bility of AC
ividual state
ess the US tr
State Costs 22 (millions)
on (www.heritage
P
ut there is on
o receive sup
orowski, 201
future federa
t as a contrib
mpact of the c
use of the in
. There is ev
studies (see
e also includ
mic impact.
(Exhibit 3), m
A at the fede
can influenc
rend. States
for Medicai)
.org)
Page 3 of 27
ne example
pplemental p
12). Anothe
l Medicaid m
buting factor
currently elig
nfluential AC
vidence of th
Literature R
ded in credib
many lawma
eral level. C
ce the intern
taking a pos
id ExhibiExpen
Source: O(OECD),
Assignmen
Student
Dat
the oppositi
payments fro
er speculative
matching fun
in increasin
gible that are
CA provision
he “woodwo
Review and A
ble studies su
akers opposi
Certainly this
national trend
sition of refu
it 4: OECD Cnditures Perc
Organisation for Ecstats.oecd.org, 20
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
on cites in M
om the state
e point raise
nds. The op
ng enrollmen
e not enrolle
ns such as th
ork” effect bu
Appendix B
uch as admin
ing Medicaid
s is a debata
d of inflation
using eligibl
Countries Tocent Inflation
conomic Co-opera13
US 5Infla
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
Massachusett
after covera
ed by the
pposition also
nt and spendi
ed coming “o
he individual
ut its impact
B for specific
nistrative cos
d expansion
able concern
n in healthca
le federal fun
otal Health n, 2001-2010
ation and Developm
5.6% ation
ocacy
ts of
age
o
ing.
out
l
t is
cs).
sts,
but
are
nding
0
ment
HA 605 H
for health
individua
symbolis
For this r
interest o
Relevant
F
– public
access ve
to provid
improved
Medicaid
As discu
could put
T
– have a
In exami
their econ
office wh
increasin
percentag
governm
ealth Policy
hcare as a sy
als to eat les
sm is a nice g
reason, we w
of the state e
t Stakehold
eldstein desc
interest theo
ersus afforda
de those with
d access esta
d expansion
ssed in the p
t a greater bu
The most rele
public intere
ning these st
nomic self-in
hile enhancin
ng the econom
ge of their pr
ment spending
ymbolic gest
s to make a s
gesture but i
will focus app
conomy and
ers
cribes stakeh
ory or econom
ability is at th
h low income
ablishes a mo
want to limi
previous sect
urden on tax
evant stakeho
est position c
takeholder m
nterest (Feld
ng their indiv
mic opportu
rofits and tra
g on program
P
ture that they
symbolic ge
it has little im
propriately o
d Mississippi
holder policy
mic theory (
he heart of t
es affordable
ore efficient
it governmen
tion, entitlem
xpayers.
olders – poli
consistent w
motivations,
dstein, 2006)
vidual and p
unities in the
aditionally, b
ms such as M
Page 4 of 27
y want to low
esture that th
mpact in add
on the eviden
ians access t
y positions a
Feldstein, 20
he debate. S
e access to h
and effectiv
nt spending t
ment spendin
iticians, busi
with their pro
the public in
). Politician
party influen
market. He
business has
Medicaid exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
wer federal s
hey want to e
dressing the i
nce that iden
to affordable
as driven by
006). The c
Supporters o
health insura
ve care deliv
to protect th
ng is creating
iness, provid
o or con stan
nterest positi
ns are driven
nce. Busines
ealthcare infl
s a negative v
pansion. As
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
spending is l
end world hu
issue of the
ntifies what
e healthcare.
either publi
ompeting pu
of Medicaid
ance. Suppor
very model.
he public eco
g debt and b
ders, insurer
nce on Medic
ion is not as
by the desir
ss is driven b
lation has co
view of incr
a sub-set of
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
like asking
unger. The s
US federal d
is in the bes
c or self-inte
ublic interest
expansion w
rters contend
Opponents t
onomic inter
budget issues
rs and the pu
caid expansio
influential a
re to remain
by profits an
onsumed a la
eased
f the busines
ocacy
state
debt.
t
erest
t of
want
d
to
est.
s that
ublic
on.
as
in
nd
arger
s
HA 605 H
commun
self-inter
the numb
Medicaid
(Cutler &
access to
of Medic
recipient
O
Republic
economic
public po
increase
supportin
– of Med
As menti
expansio
individua
majority
Republic
these ind
candidate
ealth Policy
ity, provider
rest in maint
ber of insure
d expansion
& Gruber, 19
o affordable h
caid expansio
or donor to
Of these stake
cans public in
c developme
osition, the R
in governme
ng the econo
dicaid expan
ioned, the ec
n. Oppositio
al acceptance
currently ha
cans are also
dividuals to v
es and weak
rs and insure
aining profit
d. Although
could expan
997). Finally
health insura
on in genera
the expande
eholders, law
nterest posit
ent – jobs, pe
Republicans
ent spending
omic advanta
sion in the st
conomic theo
on to any co
e and suppor
ave an anti-A
keenly awar
vote. These
en the Repub
P
ers also requ
tability supp
h insurers sh
nd or crowd-
y, the public
ance while m
al is different
ed coverage.
wmakers are
tion is to low
ersonal inco
view on Me
g. Their posi
ages – more j
tate (Holaha
ory better ex
omponent of
rt by the par
ACA position
re that more
newly motiv
blicans abili
Page 5 of 27
ire profits to
port Medicai
hare a similar
out opportun
is driven by
minimizing th
t based on w
e the stronge
wer governm
me and the p
edicaid expan
ition is chall
jobs, greater
an, Buettgen
xplains Repu
f the ACA he
rty. In recen
n which emb
e people rece
vated voters
ity to stay in
Assignmen
Student
Dat
o maintain th
d expansion
r focus on pr
nities for the
y their indivi
heir tax burd
whether the in
st and most
ment spending
private mark
nsion is bigg
lenged with
r income, an
s, Carroll, &
ublicans oppo
elps Republi
nt Mississipp
boldens Rep
eiving entitle
are likely to
n office. The
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
heir missions
n to increase
rofits, the im
e private insu
idual self-int
den. The pu
ndividual is
relevant stak
g and debt w
ket. Consiste
ger governm
consistent ev
nd positive e
& Dorn, 2012
osition to M
icans strengt
pi polling, a s
publican opp
ements creat
o favor Dem
ese are powe
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
s. Providers
payments an
mpact of
urance mark
terest to hav
ublic percept
a Medicaid
keholders.
while promot
ent with this
ment and the
vidence
conomic imp
2; Neal, 2012
Medicaid
then their
significant
osition.
te incentives
mocratic
erful self-inte
ocacy
s’
nd
ket
ve
tion
ting
s
pact
2).
for
erest
HA 605 H
motivato
support o
the Demo
Literatu
In
expansio
the Unin
Implicati
et al., 20
Governor
Affordab
Institutio
Impacts o
Kaiser R
“T
State-by-
the ACA
Medicaid
develope
data sour
1 All the
ealth Policy
rs for Repub
of Medicaid
ocrats politic
re Review
n Mississipp
n. The first
sured in coll
ions of the A
12). The sec
r, Phil Bryan
ble Care Act
ons of Higher
of Medicaid
eport
The Cost an
-State Analy
A Medicaid e
d costs, Med
ed using the U
rces for HIPS
references in
blicans to ad
expansion is
cal and econ
pi, there are t
is a national
laboration w
ACA Medica
cond is a sta
nt, to assess
on the Miss
r Learning (
Expansion i
d Coverage
ysis” or Kaise
xpansion at
dicaid enrollm
Urban Institu
SM are the C
n this section
P
dvance their o
s also driven
nomic interes
three primary
l study produ
with The Urb
aid Expansio
ate study com
the, “Financ
sissippi Med
IHL) produc
in Mississipp
Implications
er Report pr
the federal a
ment and the
ute’s Health
Current Popu
n are taken f
Page 6 of 27
own politica
n by self-inte
sts.
y studies cite
uced by the
an Institute t
on: National
mmissioned f
cial Impact R
icaid Budge
ced the third
pi, 2014-202
s of the ACA
rovides a cle
and state lev
e number of
h Insurance P
ulation Surv
from the Kai
Assignmen
Student
Dat
al and econo
erest. Medic
ed as eviden
Kaiser Com
titled, “The
and State-by
from Millim
Review of th
et” (Meersch
d study titled
25” (Neal, 2
A Medicaid E
ar and conci
vel (Holahan
uninsured.
Policy Simul
vey (CPS) an
iser Report u
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
mic interest
caid expansio
nce for and a
mmission on
Cost and Co
y-State Anal
man, Inc. by M
he Patient Pr
haert, 2012).
d, “The Fisca
012).
Expansion: N
ise analysis o
et al., 2012)
The estimat
lation Mode
nd the Medic
unless otherw
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
s. Democra
on strengthe
against Medi
Medicaid an
overage
lysis” (Holah
Mississippi
otection and
The Missis
al and Econo
National and
of the impac
)1. It include
es were
l (HIPSM).
cal Expenditu
wise cited.
ocacy
t
ens
icaid
nd
han
d
sippi
omic
d
ct of
es
The
ure
HA 605 H
Panel Su
populatio
projectio
T
$649 mil
over non
increase
expenditu
percent o
Medicaid
the feder
enrollme
represent
reduce th
uninsured
T
to the ben
$22 in fe
$649 mil
small inc
expansio
(Reeves &
ealth Policy
rvey (MEPS
on. In additi
ns.
The study est
llion over ten
-expansion.
of $1,048 m
ures for unco
of uncompen
d expansion
ral Mississipp
nt would gro
ting 22.4 to 3
he uninsured
d representin
The study con
nefits in fede
deral fundin
llion state co
crease of 3.8
n would add
& Gunn, 20
S). These da
ion, Congres
timated Miss
n years (an a
The $649 m
million minus
ompensated
nsated care c
would incre
pi Medicaid
ow by 288,0
32.1 percent
d population
ng 18.8 to 7.
ncluded the
eral funding
ng for every
ontribution o
percent abo
d a modest 0
13). More th
P
ata sources p
ssional Budg
sissippi’s inc
average annu
million net in
s the savings
care. Curre
osts for the u
ase by $14.5
d budget. In
000, an incre
t of the popu
by 327,000
.9 percent of
costs of imp
and expand
$1 Mississip
over ten year
ove the curre
.4 percent to
han half (58
Page 7 of 27
provide insur
get Office (C
cremental co
ual cost of $6
ncrease acco
s of $400 mil
ently, state an
uninsured. T
5 billion ove
addition to c
ase from the
ulation, respe
moving from
f the Mississ
plementing M
ded coverage
ppi contribut
s. The Miss
ent state Med
o the overall
%) of the cu
Assignmen
Student
Dat
rance covera
CBO) estima
ost of Medica
64.9 million
ounts for the
llion associa
nd local gov
The federal
er ten years –
cost, the stud
e current 669
ectively. Me
m a total of 5
sippi populat
Medicaid exp
e. Medicaid
tes – $14.5 b
sissippi cost
dicaid expen
2013 Missis
urrently unin
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
age and spen
ates were use
aid expansio
n) – a 3.8 per
Medicaid ex
ated with red
vernments fin
subsidy to M
– a 29.8 perc
dy concluded
9,000 to 957
edicaid expa
562,000 to 2
tion, respect
pansion are m
expansion w
billion federa
of Medicaid
nditures. For
ssippi appro
nsured in Mi
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
nding for the
ed to make
on would be
rcent increas
xpansion
duction in sta
nance about
Mississippi fo
cent increase
d Medicaid
,000 enrolle
ansion would
235,000
ively.
minor comp
would provid
al subsidy to
d expansion
r 2013, Med
opriations bu
ssissippi wo
ocacy
U.S.
se
ate
30
for
e in
ees
d
ared
de
o
is a
dicaid
udget
ould
HA 605 H
be insure
specific s
services t
would be
governm
T
data that
omission
within th
produced
The study
significan
Mississip
Milliman
“F
Mississip
Mississip
(Meersch
choice in
eligibility
2 All the r
ealth Policy
ed with Medi
savings on it
that are curr
e covered un
ment.
The author no
could offset
n in the analy
he state. How
d from $14.5
y does not in
ntly, if not c
ppi.
n Report
Financial Im
ppi Medicaid
ppi Governo
haert, 2010,
n implementa
y to 133 perc
references in
icaid expans
tems such as
rently covere
nder Medicai
otes a signifi
t the cost of
ysis of the ec
w many jobs
5 billion of fe
ncorporate th
ompletely, o
mpact Review
d Budget” or
r Haley Barb
2012)2. The
ation of ACA
cent of Fede
n this section
P
sion. The be
s mental heal
ed by the stat
id with expan
icant limitati
Medicaid ex
conomic imp
s, wages, spe
ederal funds
his economic
offset the $6
w of the Pati
r the Millima
bour and upd
e June 28, 20
A provisions
eral Poverty L
n are taken f
Page 8 of 27
enefits are co
lth, substanc
tes outside th
nsion – whic
ion in the stu
xpansion. Th
pact that resu
ending and o
infused in t
c impact fac
49 million c
ent Protectio
an Report w
dated in 201
012 U.S. Sup
s related to e
Level (FPL)
from the Mil
Assignmen
Student
Dat
onservative b
ce abuse, pub
he Medicaid
ch is primari
udy is that it
he most sign
ults from add
other econom
the Mississip
ctor. This fa
cost of Medic
on and Affor
was first comm
2 at the requ
preme Court
expanding th
). With this
lliman Repor
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
based on mi
blic health a
d program. T
ily funded b
t is missing s
nificant miss
ditional fede
mic growth f
ppi economy
ctor alone co
caid expansi
rdable Care
missioned in
uest of Gove
t decision ga
he Medicaid
flexibility, M
rt unless oth
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
ssing state-
and social
These servic
y the federal
state-specific
sing data is t
eral spending
factors would
y over ten ye
ould
ion for
Act on the
n 2010 by fo
ernor Phil Br
ave states a
program
Mississippi
herwise cited
ocacy
ces
l
c
the
g
d be
ears?
ormer
ryant
d.
HA 605 H
retained M
expansio
T
$336 to $
3.9 perce
the low, e
enrollme
included
participat
conclude
woodwor
63,000 en
inclusion
the 2014
represent
T
results. T
significan
estimate
Mississip
between
Medicaid
ealth Policy
Milliman, In
n segments
The study est
$454 million
ent increase o
estimating 6
nt. A full 10
at the reque
tion was not
ed Medicaid
rk effect wou
nrollees (see
n of the wood
projected of
ting 32.2 to 3
The study sum
The study co
nt impact to
the total fina
ppi Medicaid
$609 million
d expenditur
nc. to evalua
on the Missi
timated Miss
n over seven
over non-exp
60 percent en
00 percent e
est of the MS
t considered
enrollment w
uld account
e Appendix B
dwork effect
f 740,000 wo
34.7 percent
mmary the a
oncluded the
the Mississi
ancial impac
d budget dur
n and $1.032
res.” There a
P
ate the financ
issippi Medi
sissippi’s inc
years (an an
pansion. Th
nrollment of
nrollment sc
S Departmen
a reasonable
would grow
for 21.4 to 2
B, Advantag
t and other n
ould increas
t of the Miss
author includ
e costs of AC
ippi Medicai
ct of the full
ring the next
2 billion doll
are several m
Page 9 of 27
cial impact o
icaid program
cremental co
nnual averag
he cost range
Medicaid el
cenario was
nt of Medicai
e assumption
between 22
21.8% of the
ges and Limi
notable study
e to a total 9
sissippi popu
ded the misle
CA including
id budget. T
implementa
t seven years
lars, or betw
misleading p
Assignmen
Student
Dat
of three poten
m.
ost of Medica
ge cost of $4
e relates to th
ligible, to th
modeled but
id to underst
n. In additio
0,000 to 294
e enrollment
itations secti
y comparison
960,000 to 1
ulation, respe
eading upper
g Medicaid e
The Milliman
ation of the A
s (state fiscal
ween 5.2% an
oints in this
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
ntial ACA M
aid expansio
8 to $65 mil
he level of p
e expected 8
t the author
tand the upp
on to cost, th
4,000 enrolle
or between
ion to note th
ns). The tot
,034,000 enr
ectively.
r bound full
expansion w
n Report sta
ACA on the
l years 2014
nd 8.8% of b
summary. A
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
Medicaid
on would be
llion) – a 2.9
participation
80 percent
noted this w
per bound. F
he study
ees. The
48,000 to
he Kaiser Re
tal enrollees
rollees
participation
would be a
ated, “We
state of
4 to 2020) to
baseline state
An upper lim
ocacy
9 to
at
was
Full
eport
from
n
be
e
mit of
HA 605 H
100 perce
eligible w
Medicaid
author us
Addition
Medicaid
expansio
non-expa
S
state gen
expenditu
reduction
results ar
T
These lea
“unafford
inaccurat
position.
projectio
Section 1
Medicaid
Mississip
ealth Policy
ent participa
will enroll, a
d. The autho
ses the total A
nal ACA man
d expansion.
n would be
ansion.
ignificant ex
eral fund res
ures for heal
ns to Medica
re incomplet
The Milliman
aders have c
dable” statin
te and mislea
The study c
n of the fina
1. Summary
d expansion
ppi Medicaid
ation is erron
and all the ne
or noted in th
ACA impac
ndates are an
As noted, t
$336 to $454
xclusions inc
sulting from
lthcare servi
aid Dispropo
te even with
n Report is li
ited the Mill
ng, “ACA wi
ading use of
clearly states
ancial impact
of Results).”
for Mississip
d budget.
P
neous. This
ewly eligible
he report thi
t rather than
n expense bu
the study est
4 million ov
clude: econo
state spendi
ces that wou
ortionate Sha
relatively so
imited and ra
liman Repor
ill increase M
f the Millima
s in bold lett
t of the ACA
” The repor
ppi – it only
age 10 of 27
assumes all
e with privat
s was unlike
n the relevant
urden of the
timated Miss
ver seven yea
omic impact,
ing from fed
uld be covere
are Hospital
olid methodo
aises concer
rt as evidenc
Mississippi c
an Report to
ters, “The sc
A on the Mis
rt does not ad
y provides in
Assignmen
Student
Dat
newly eligib
te insurance
ely yet retain
t sub-set of M
state regardl
sissippi’s inc
ars – a 2.9 to
, federal sub
deral subsidy
ed in Medica
(DSH). Wit
ology incorp
rns in its mis
ce that Medic
costs by $1 b
justify an an
cope of our r
ssissippi Me
ddress “affor
nformation on
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
ble will enro
will drop it t
ned it in their
Medicaid ex
less of the d
cremental co
o 3.9 percent
sidy impact,
y, reductions
aid expansio
th these excl
porated in th
suse by some
caid expansi
billion.” Thi
nti-Medicaid
report is limi
edicaid budge
rdability” of
n the impact
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
oll, all curren
to enroll in
r summary.
xpansion.
ecision on
ost of Medic
t increase ov
, increases in
s in state
on, and
lusions the
e analysis.
e politicians
ion is
is is an
d expansion
ited to a
et (page 1,
f ACA or
t of ACA to
ocacy
ntly
The
caid
ver
n
.
the
HA 605 H
IHL Repo
“T
IHL Rep
2012 (Ne
of the fis
provides
expansio
Regional
economic
spending
T
$497 to $
The cost
million, m
expansio
taxes (ad
General F
impact re
impact. I
provided
Report in
3 All the r
ealth Policy
ort
The Fiscal a
ort was prod
eal, 2012)3.
cal impacts
an overall e
n to the Mis
l Economic M
c impact of j
g in Mississip
The study est
$556 million
range relate
moderate (85
n would hav
dditions to th
Fund revenu
elated to job
It is easily c
d in the impa
ncluding the
references in
and Economi
duced by The
As stated in
of Medicaid
economic im
ssissippi Med
Model, Inc.
jobs, labor in
ppi.
timated Miss
n over twelve
es to the thre
5%) is $551
ve an offsetti
he Mississipp
ue were inclu
s and incom
alculated fro
ct of the add
additional M
n this section
P
ic Impacts of
e Mississipp
n the report, t
d expansion i
mpact of Med
dicaid budge
(REMI) Tax
ncome and s
sissippi’s inc
e years (an a
e levels of th
million, and
ing economi
pi General F
uded in the e
e that is in th
om the detail
ditional perso
Mississippi e
n are taken f
age 11 of 27
f Medicaid E
pi Institution
the purpose
in Mississipp
dicaid expans
et. The econ
x-PI model.
state General
cremental co
annual averag
he newly elig
d high (95%)
ic impact rel
und revenue
estimates abo
he detail of t
l report by a
onal income
economic im
from the IHL
Assignmen
Student
Dat
Expansion in
ns of Higher
was to “prov
pi.” This stu
sion in addit
nomic impac
The REMI m
l Fund reven
ost of Medica
ge cost of $4
gible partici
) is $556 mi
lated to jobs,
e). The addi
ove. Howev
the report is
adding the cu
e in the state
mpact data).
L Report unl
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
n Mississipp
Learning (IH
vide an unbi
udy is uniqu
tion to the im
ct was estima
model estim
nue of new f
aid expansio
41 to $46 mi
ipation low (
illion. The M
, income and
itions to the M
ver, the addit
not applied
umulative ec
(see Append
The study e
less otherwis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
pi, 2014-2025
HL) in Octob
iased assessm
ue because it
mpact of
ated using th
mates the
federal Medi
on would be
illion annual
(75%) is $49
Medicaid
d additional
Mississippi
tional econo
to the summ
conomic imp
dix A for IH
stimated
se cited.
ocacy
5” or
ber
ment
he
icaid
lly).
97
state
omic
mary
pact
HL
HA 605 H
Medicaid
from $6.6
$619 mil
positive i
(an annua
result of
Mississip
annual av
subsidy a
expansio
final estim
310,039
would be
represent
this woul
of the po
T
years 201
the Missi
the twelv
care coul
that is be
ealth Policy
d expansion
6 to $7.4 bil
llion). Adjus
incremental
al average ec
Medicaid ex
ppi for Medi
verage increm
and economi
n would hav
mate reporte
(high partici
e an estimate
ting 24.8 to 3
ld be an estim
pulation.
The study con
17 to 2025.
issippi Gene
ve year perio
ld enhance th
eyond the sco
would have
lion over tw
sting for the
impact to th
conomic boo
xpansion ran
icaid expansi
mental feder
ic impact, th
ve a $6 billio
ed was Medi
ipation) in th
ed increase f
30.5 percent
mated increa
ncluded Med
The state co
eral Fund rev
od – 2012 to
he health of
ope of the st
P
an offsetting
welve years (a
economic im
he Mississipp
ost of $512 t
nged from 7,9
ion would in
ral funding o
he $10 billion
on plus econo
icaid enrollm
his twelve ye
from the curr
t of the popu
ase to a proje
dicaid expan
osts of Medic
venue were p
2025. The a
Mississippia
tudy. The au
age 12 of 27
g economic
an annual av
mpact, Medi
pi economy o
to $572 milli
950 to 8,860
ncrease $10.
of $0.9 to $1
n plus in fed
omic stimulu
ment would g
ear period. F
rent 740,000
ulation, respe
ected 1,050,
nsion will ge
caid expansi
projected to r
author went
ans that migh
uthor’s concl
Assignmen
Student
Dat
impact from
verage econo
icaid expans
of $6.1 to $6
ion). Additi
0 by 2025. T
8 to $12.1 b
1.0 billion).
deral subsidy
us to the stat
grow 244,76
For the low p
0 to a project
ectively. Fo
039 enrollee
enerate addit
ion including
range from $
on to sugge
ght have a lon
luding comm
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
m jobs and in
omic stimulu
sion would h
6.9 billion ov
ional jobs in
The federal s
illion over tw
In summariz
y to Mississip
te over twelv
68 (low parti
participation
ted 984,768
or high partic
es representi
tional state M
g the offsetti
$497 to $556
st increased
ng-term econ
ment was, “P
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
ncome rangin
us of $554 to
have a net
ver twelve y
n Mississippi
subsidy to
welve years
zing the fede
ppi for Medi
ve years. Th
icipation) to
n scenario, th
enrollees
cipation scen
ing 32.5 perc
Medicaid cos
ing additions
6 million ov
access to he
nomic benef
Paying for it
ocacy
ng
o
years
i as a
(an
eral
icaid
he
his
nario,
cent
sts in
s to
ver
ealth
fit
HA 605 H
(Medicai
There is r
For exam
and child
from Me
governm
Gruber, 1
T
describin
excluded
Mississip
not read
inference
revenue t
but the ov
This sign
appropria
the full e
reason fo
state agen
ealth Policy
id expansion
research to s
mple, Medica
d mortality b
dicaid expan
ment interven
1996).
The main crit
ng the unden
d an explanat
ppi economy
or comprehe
es could mis
that is not en
verall econo
nificant misr
ately and eff
conomic ben
or excluding
ncy and ther
n) in the year
support of a
aid expansio
by 5.1 percen
nsion is com
tions, Medic
tique of the s
niable econom
tion of the ec
y. This was
end beyond t
lead the read
nough to offs
omic public a
epresentatio
fectively in s
nefit in repo
this informa
refore relucta
P
rs ahead mig
long-term ec
n for childre
nt (Currie &
mpared with s
caid expansi
study is in th
mic benefit o
conomic imp
a significant
the informat
der to conclu
fset expansio
and private e
n of the data
support of M
rting summa
ation could b
ant to signifi
age 13 of 27
ght be a chall
conomic ben
en was found
Gruber, 199
studies relate
on provides
he conclusion
of Medicaid
pact related
t oversight b
tion in the ex
ude the only
on costs. At
economic be
a leads to mi
Medicaid exp
ary results is
be that the au
ficantly unde
Assignmen
Student
Dat
lenge (Page
nefit but it w
d to lower in
94). If this ty
ed to cost pe
greater savi
ns by the au
expansion f
to jobs and i
because most
xecutive sum
economic im
the state gov
enefit to Mis
issed opportu
pansion. The
s unknown.
uthor is a sta
ermine the G
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
21, General
was not cited
nfant mortali
ype of outco
er life saved
ings (Cutler
uthor that fell
from the data
income to th
t users of the
mmary. The
mpact is in t
vernment lev
ssissippi far e
unities in us
e reason the
Although sp
ate employee
Governors po
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
l Conclusion
d in the study
ity by 8.5 pe
ome resulting
of alternativ
& Gruber, 1
l short of
a. The autho
he overall
ese studies d
author’s
the additiona
vel that is tru
exceeds the
sing the study
author left o
peculative, a
e working fo
osition.
ocacy
ns).”
y.
ercent
g
ve
1997;
or
do
al tax
ue,
cost.
y
out
a
or a
HA 605 H
Literatur
T
varying l
studies e
Although
costs whe
took the
subsidy f
impact of
benefits,
would be
enrollme
The studi
mentione
these stud
Concept
T
from Car
Rudowitz
expansio
commun
the relate
ealth Policy
re Review Co
The Kaiser, M
levels of deta
stimate a $4
h debated in
en factoring
federal impa
for Medicaid
f the federal
the Kaiser s
e insured wit
nt range rela
ies varied in
ed enrollee p
dies does su
tual Model
The conceptu
rbaugh et al.
z, 2004). Th
n study com
ity. The eco
ed Mississipp
onclusion of
Milliman and
ail (see Appe
1 to $65 mil
the study su
in the impac
act into cons
d expansion
subsidy wh
study found m
th Medicaid
ated to expan
n their numbe
participation
pport a posit
ual model for
Flow of Me
his model wi
mparison grid
onomic impa
pi General F
P
f the Kaiser,
d IHL Repor
endix B 1-7,
llion annual
ummaries, th
ct of the asso
sideration, th
in Mississip
ich exceeded
more than ha
expansion.
nsion from 2
er of scenari
range. The
tion in favor
r Medicaid e
edicaid Dolla
ill be used w
d (see Appen
act – increase
Fund revenue
age 14 of 27
Milliman an
rts all have s
, for a compa
cost to Miss
he benefits of
ociated fede
he estimates
pi. The IHL
d $500 milli
alf (58%) of
The studies
231,000 to ju
ios but their
economic a
r of Medicaid
expansion in
ars Through
with an evide
ndix B for de
es in jobs, in
e generated –
Assignmen
Student
Dat
nd IHL Repo
some very sim
arison grid o
sissippi for M
f Medicaid e
eral subsidy.
sighted over
L study went
ion a year. I
f the currentl
consistently
ust over 310
most likely
and expanded
d expansion
n Mississippi
a State Econ
ence based M
etails) with a
ncome and c
– have a stro
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
orts
milar conclu
of the three s
Medicaid exp
expansion fa
For the two
r $1 billion a
t on to asses
In addition to
ly uninsured
y identified a
,000 addition
options all f
d coverage e
n.
i (Exhibit 5)
nomy (Carb
Mississippi M
a focus on th
consumer spe
ong appeal fo
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
usions with
studies). Th
pansion.
ar exceed the
o studies tha
average annu
s the econom
o the financi
d in Mississip
a Medicaid
nal enrollees
fell within th
evidence from
is modified
baugh, Marks
Medicaid
he business
ending as we
for the busine
ocacy
he
e
at
ual
mic
ial
ppi
s.
he
m
d
s, &
ell as
ess
HA 605 H
commun
Mississip
economic
compellin
Healthca
advocatin
ealth Policy
ity. In addit
ppi. As large
c impact of M
ng case for s
Exhibi
Source: ModMedicaid Do
are providers
ng for Medic
tion, the busi
e employers
Medicaid ex
support from
it 5: Concep
dified from The Roollars Through a S
s are viewed
caid expansi
P
iness commu
, hospital lea
xpansion to t
m key busine
tual Model f
ole of Medicaid in tate Economy (Ca
as biased an
ion. An allia
age 15 of 27
unity has sig
aders can fac
he business
ess leaders ou
for Medicaid
State Economies: arbaugh et al., 2004
nd promoting
ance of busin
Assignmen
Student
Dat
gnificant infl
cilitate a bro
community.
utside of the
d Expansion
A Look at the Res4).
g their own s
ness leaders
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
fluence on po
oader unders
. The hope i
e healthcare i
n in Mississip
search, Flow of
self-interest
broadens th
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
olitical leade
standing of th
is to establis
industry.
ppi
when
he base of
ocacy
ers in
he
sh a
HA 605 H
support, m
influentia
Mississip
importan
Mississip
creating a
Medicaid
the busin
Mississip
Summar
A
Care: An
Hospitals
engine fo
“S
si
M
m
Mississip
“T
“C
ealth Policy
minimizes s
al business c
ppi Economi
nt economic
ppi, establish
a comprehen
d expansion
ness commun
ppi.
ry Policy Ar
As endorsed b
n Economic D
s join busine
or Mississipp
State busine
ignificant sh
Mississippi h
making Missi
ppi Hospitals
Targeting he
Creating a c
elf-interest c
coalition in M
ic Council (M
driver for M
hed some ver
nsive strateg
(or eligible a
nity and com
rgument
by the Missi
Driver (Hess
ess leaders in
pi.
ss and politi
hort-term hea
ealth care ca
issippians he
s endorse the
ealth care as
omprehensiv
P
criticism and
Mississippi i
MEC). The
Mississippi. T
ry specific g
gy around thi
alternative to
mplement the
issippi Econo
s, Hampton,
n promoting
ical leaders r
alth and econ
an be an inno
ealthier and t
e MEC Blue
an economi
ve strategy a
age 16 of 27
d strengthens
s the state ch
MEC has hi
The most rec
goals targetin
is industry.
o draw down
e recommend
omic Counc
Music, Thak
the position
recognize he
nomic impac
ovative, com
the workforc
eprint recom
ic driver.”
around health
Assignmen
Student
Dat
s the messag
hamber of co
istorically ad
cent MEC st
ng healthcar
The summar
n the federal
dations in th
cil (MEC) Bl
akur, & Mail
n to advance
ealth care ha
cts, but also
mpetitive sys
ce more effe
mmendations:
h care.”
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
ge and messe
ommerce kn
dvocated tha
trategic plan
re as an econ
ry policy arg
l match) will
he MEC Blue
lueprint Mis
lo, 2012), M
healthcare a
as the potenti
long-term ec
stem that cre
ective.”
:
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
enger. The m
nown as the
at healthcare
n, MEC Blue
nomic driver
gument for
l be tailored
eprint
ssissippi Hea
ississippi
as an econom
ial for not on
conomic gro
eates jobs wh
ocacy
most
is an
eprint
and
to
alth
mic
nly
owth.
hile
HA 605 H
“I
“I
Mississip
Mississip
recomme
S
av
P
th
as
st
bu
fe
E
h
an
th
h
H
ov
M
bu
ealth Policy
Increasing th
Increasing th
ppi Hospitals
ppi Health C
endations tha
timulate M
vailable for h
Pro-business
hese federal
s an overall
trategy, incre
usiness exam
ederally spon
Expand Hea
ealthcare ser
nd other pro
hrough emer
igh quality h
Hospitals in M
ver 50,000+
Mississippi B
usinesses co
he number o
he number o
s are taking
Care plan and
at include:
ississippi Ec
healthcare to
s Model for
funds that ad
economic dr
eased physic
mples to exp
nsored cover
lth Insuran
rvices should
viders enabl
rgency care a
healthcare re
Mississippi h
+ full-time jo
Business Co
ollaborate wi
P
of active phy
of health care
a united pro
d request som
conomy. Dr
o stimulate t
Healthcare
dvances the
river for Mis
cians, and in
plore are sma
rage expansi
nce Coverag
d be able to
le Mississipp
and as a mat
equires stable
have a $9.5 b
obs and a pay
ollaborative
ith health sys
age 17 of 27
ysicians in th
e professiona
-business po
me additiona
rawing down
the Mississip
e. Establishi
previous ME
ssissippi bus
ncreased heal
all business e
ion, etc.
e to Advanc
obtain care.
pians access
tter of compa
e funding wh
billion total
yroll of over
to Improve
stems to imp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
he state.”
als througho
osition in sup
al pro-busine
n the maxim
ppi economy
ing a pro-bus
EC recomm
sinesses, com
lth care prof
exchanges, s
ce Business.
Nurses, phy
to healthcar
assion for ot
hich in turn
annual impa
r $2.4 billion
e Competitiv
prove the he
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
out the state.”
pport of the
ess endorsem
mum federal
y.
siness mode
endations –
mprehensive
fessionals. S
state based e
. People wh
ysicians, the
re services a
ther unfunde
stabilizes th
act to the stat
n per year (M
veness. Mis
alth and pro
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
”
MEC Bluep
ments in the M
funding
l for the use
boost health
health care
Some pro-
exchanges,
ho need
erapists, hosp
as a matter of
ed care. Safe
he economy.
te economy
MHA, 2007).
ssissippi
ductivity of
ocacy
MEC
of
h care
pitals
f law
e,
with
.
the
HA 605 H
w
p
co
T
create
impa
addit
to aff
(18.8
nurse
ealth Policy
workforce. B
artners that a
osts.
The collabora
e over 8,000
ct of over $5
ional cost to
fordable hea
%) to 235,0
es and hospit
Businesses th
address dise
ative effort to
0 jobs in Mis
500 million t
o the state bu
lth insurance
00 (7.9%). M
tals all benef
P
hat participat
ase managem
o draw down
ssissippi and
to the state –
udget. In add
e. The unins
Mississippi
fit in taking
age 18 of 27
te in this col
ment, wellne
n the maxim
d have an inc
– an econom
dition, thous
sured in Mis
citizens, bus
action to ma
Assignmen
Student
Dat
llaborative w
ess and other
mum federal f
cremental po
mic impact af
sands of Mis
ssissippi will
sinesses, pat
aximize fede
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
would have h
r factors to r
funding for h
ositive annua
fter accountin
ssissippians w
l be reduced
tients, taxpay
eral funding
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
health system
reduce health
healthcare w
al economic
ng for the
will have ac
d from 562,0
yers, physici
for healthca
ocacy
m
hcare
would
cess
00
ians,
are.
HA 605 H
CarbaughL
Currie, JM
Cutler, DA
FeldsteinE
Gruber, JP
HaislmaiE
Hess, R.,C
Holahan,thF
MeerschaCM
MeerschaC
MHA. (2M
Neal, B. 2In
Reeves, TFht
ealth Policy
h, A., MarksLook at the R., & Gruber,
Medicaid eligD. M., & GruAnd Implicatn, P. J. (2006Edition. ChicJ. (1996). Heast Decade: ier, E. F., &
Expansion Pr, Hampton, P
Care: An Eco, J., Buettgenhe ACA Medamily Foundaert, J. D. (2
Care Act As AMedicaid Budaert, J. D. (2
Care Act On 2007). BeyonMississippi H
(2012). The 025 An Econnstitutions ofT., & Gunn, ISCAL YEAttp://www.d
s, C., & RudoResearch. Ka
J. (1994). Sgibility for puber, J. (1997ions. Health
6). The Politiago, IL: Heaealth InsuranNational BuGonshorows
rojections. ThP., Music, Donomic Drivens, M., Carrodicaid expandation.
2010). FinancAmended bydget.
2012). Financthe Mississipnd Health Ca
Hospital AssoFiscal and E
nomic Brief f Higher LeaP. (2013). S
AR 2013. frodfa.state.ms.u
P
R
owitz, R. (20aiser CommisSaving babieregnant wom7). Peer Rev
h Affairs, 16(ics of Healthalth Adminisnce for Poor ureau of Ecoski, D. (2012
The Heritage ., Thakur, Rer (pp. 30): Moll, C., & Donsion: Nation
cial Impact Ry H.R. 4782,
cial Impact Rppi Medicaiare: Mississiociation (MHEconomic ImFrom the Unarning. STATE OF Mom us/Offices/O
age 19 of 27
References
004). The Rossion on Mes: the efficac
men: Nationaview: Medica(1), 194-200h Legislationstration PresWomen and
onomic Rese2). State LawFoundation
R., & Mailo, NMississippi Eorn, S. (2012nal and state
Review of th, The Recon
Review of thd Budget. ippi HospitaHA). mpacts of Me
University Res
MISSISSIPP
OBFM/Forms
Assignmen
Student
Dat
ole of Medicedicaid and tcy and cost oal Bureau ofaid And Priv
0. n: An Econoss Perspectivd Children inarch.
wmaker’s Gun: Issue BriefN. (2012). BEconomic C2). The cost e-by-state an
he Patient Prciliation Act
he Patient Pr
als as Vital E
edicaid Expasearch Cent
PI GENERA
s/FY2013Bu
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
caid in Statethe Uninsureof recent expf Economic Rvate Insuranc
mic Perspecves. n the US: Le
uide to Evalf(3720), 3.
Blueprint MiCouncil.
and coveragnalysis: Henr
rotection andt of 2010 On
rotection and
Economic En
ansion in Mter (pp. 31):
AL FUND BU
udget.pdf
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
e Economiesed (April 200pansions of Research. ce: Evidence
ctive, 3rd
essons from t
uating Medi
ississippi He
ge implicatiory J. Kaiser
d Affordablen the Mississ
d Affordable
ngines (pp. 3
ississippi, 20Mississippi
UDGET FO
ocacy
: A 04).
e
the
icaid
ealth
ons of
e sippi
e
3):
014-
OR
HA 605 H
Ap
SUMMAR
Table 1. H
Year En
2014 2
2015 2
2016 3
2017 3
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 3
2022 3
2023 3
2024 3
2025 3
Table 2. M
Year En
2014 2
2015 22016 2
2017 2
2018 2
2019 2
2020 2
2021 2
2022 2
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
Table 3. L
Year En2014 2
2015 2
2016 2
2017 2
2018 2
2019 2
2020 2
2021 2
2022 2
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
ealth Policy
pendix A: IH
RY OF RESULT
High Participatio
nrollment
SMe
C
280,782 $
296,972 $
313,125 $
312,781 $
312,437 $
312,093 $
311,750 1$
311,407 1$
311,064 1$
310,722 1$
310,380 1$
310,039 1$
Moderate Partici
nrollment
SMe
C
247,749 $
263,975 $ 280,165 $
279,857 $
279,549 $
279,241 $
278,934 1$
278,627 1$
278,321 1$
278,015 1$
277,709 1$
277,403 1$
Low Participatio
nrollment
SMe
C214,716 $
230,978 $
247,204 $
246,932 $
246,661 $
246,389 $
246,118 1$
245,848 1$
245,577 1$
245,307 1$
245,037 1$
244,768 1$
HL Report in
TS (Addendum c
on Scenario (95%
State edicaid Costs
AdditState GFund R
8.5 $
17.5 $
18.9 $
45.9 $
78.5 $
92.1 $
117.8 $
138.9 $
143.7 $
148.7 $
153.8 $
159.1 $
ipation Scenario
State edicaid Costs
AdditState GFund R
8.0 $
16.6 $ 18.0 $
43.8 $
75.0 $
87.9 $
112.5 $
132.6 $
137.2 $
141.9 $
146.8 $
151.9 $
n Scenario (75%
State edicaid Costs
AdditState GFund R
7.3 $
15.3 $
16.8 $
41.1 $
70.3 $
82.4 $
105.5 $
124.4 $
128.7 $
133.1 $
137.7 $
142.5 $
Mississippi Go
Mississippi Go
Mississippi Go
P
ncluding the
calculations to I
% participation
tions to General Revenue
Net FisBur
8.5 $
26.7 ($
39.1 (2$
43.9 $
47.8 3$
50.6 4$
53.2 6$
55.7 8$
57.8 8$
59.6 8$
61.4 9$
63.3 9$
o (85% participa
tions to General Revenue
Net FisBur
8.0 $
25.2 ($ 37.1 (1$
41.9 $
45.6 2$
48.4 3$
50.8 6$
53.2 7$
55.3 8$
56.9 8$
58.7 8$
60.5 9$
% participation b
tions to General Revenue
Net FisBur
7.4 $
23.4 ($
34.6 (1$
39.2 $
42.8 2$
45.5 3$
47.8 5$
50.0 7$
51.9 7$
53.5 7$
55.1 8$
56.8 8$
overnment Impac
overnment Impac
overnment Impac
age 20 of 27
e Additional
IHL Report on M
by 2016), 2014
State cal
rden
CumulaState Fi
Burde
- -$
(9.2) (9$
20.2) (29$
2.0 (27$
30.8 3$
41.4 44$
64.6 109$
83.3 192$
85.9 278$
89.1 367$
92.4 460$
95.8 555$
ation by 2016),
State cal
rden
CumulaState Fi
Burde
- -$
(8.6) (8$ 19.1) (27$
1.9 (25$
29.4 3$
39.5 43$
61.6 104$
79.4 184$
81.9 266$
85.0 351$
88.1 439$
91.4 530$
by 2016), 2014
State cal
rden
CumulaState Fi
Burde- -$
(8.1) (8$
17.8) (25$
1.8 (24$
27.5 3$
36.9 40$
57.7 98$
74.4 172$
76.8 249$
79.6 328$
82.6 411$
85.7 497$
ct
ct
ct
Assignmen
Student
Dat
Mississippi
Medicaid Expan
4-2025
ative iscal en Employ
4,1
9.2) 8,4
9.4) 8,7
7.4) 9,0
3.4 9,12
4.8 9,0
9.4 9,1
2.7 9,2
8.6 9,0
7.7 8,9
0.1 8,92
5.9 8,8
2014-2025
ative iscal en Employ
3,94
8.6) 7,97.7) 8,3
5.8) 8,6
3.6 8,7
3.1 8,6
4.7 8,7
4.1 8,7
6.0 8,6
.0 8,5
9.1 8,52
0.5 8,4
4-2025
ative iscal en Employ
3,64
8.1) 7,3
5.9) 7,82
4.1) 8,1
3.4 8,1
0.3 8,14
8.0 8,22
2.4 8,2
9.2 8,1
8.8 8,0
.4 8,0
7.1 7,9
Addit
Addit
Addit
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
Economic I
nsion, October, 2
yment PersonIncom
78 190$
01 417$
76 484$
59 545$
20 594$
65 633$
54 673$
00 712$
92 744$
99 775$
24 808$
60 841$
yment PersonIncom
41 180$
55 394$ 65 461$
59 520$
19 567$
66 604$
50 643$
94 681$
89 711$
99 741$
27 771$
66 803$
yment PersonIncom
41 166$
84 366$
28 431$
35 489$
93 532$
43 567$
20 604$
63 639$
62 667$
77 696$
08 724$
50 754$
tional Mississip
tional Mississip
tional Mississip
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
mpact Data
2012)
nal me
CumulEcomo
Impa
.8 19$
.0 60$
.8 1,09$
.4 1,63$
.0 2,23$
.0 2,86$
.8 3,53$
.8 4,25$
.6 4,99$
.8 5,77$
.2 6,58$
.2 7,42$
nal me
CumulEcomo
Impa
.0 18$
.8 57$
.4 1,03$
.8 1,55$
.0 2,12$
.8 2,72$
.8 3,37$
.0 4,05$
.0 4,76$
.0 5,50$
.6 6,27$
.4 7,08$
nal me
CumulEcomo
Impa.8 16$
.6 53$
.4 96$
.0 1,45$
.8 1,98$
.6 2,55$
.8 3,15$
.6 3,79$
.8 4,46$
.0 5,16$
.8 5,88$
.2 6,64$
ppi Economic Im
ppi Economic Im
ppi Economic Im
ocacy
ative omic act
90.8
07.8
92.6
38.0
32.0
65.0
38.8
51.6
96.2
72.0
80.2
21.4
ative omic act
80.0
74.8 36.2
57.0
24.0
28.8
72.6
53.6
64.6
05.6
77.2
80.6
ative omic act 66.8
33.4
64.8
53.8
86.6
54.2
59.0
98.6
66.4
62.4
87.2
41.4
mpact
mpact
mpact
HA 605 H
ealth Policy
Appendix BB (1 of 7): M
P
Mississippi M
age 21 of 27
Medicaid Exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
pansion Stud
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
dy Comparis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
son Grid
ocacy
HA 605 H
ealth Policy
Appendix BB (2 of 7): M
P
Mississippi M
age 22 of 27
Medicaid Exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
pansion Stud
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
dy Comparis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
son Grid
ocacy
HA 605 H
ealth Policy
Appendix BB (3 of 7): M
P
Mississippi M
age 23 of 27
Medicaid Exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
pansion Stud
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
dy Comparis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
son Grid
ocacy
HA 605 H
ealth Policy
Appendix BB (4 of 7): M
P
Mississippi M
age 24 of 27
Medicaid Exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
pansion Stud
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
dy Comparis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
son Grid
ocacy
HA 605 H
ealth Policy
Appendix BB (5 of 7): M
P
Mississippi M
age 25 of 27
Medicaid Exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
pansion Stud
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
dy Comparis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
son Grid
ocacy
HA 605 H
ealth Policy
Appendix BB (6 of 7): M
P
Mississippi M
age 26 of 27
Medicaid Exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
pansion Stud
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
dy Comparis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
son Grid
ocacy
HA 605 H
ealth Policy
Appendix BB (7 of 7): M
P
Mississippi M
age 27 of 27
Medicaid Exp
Assignmen
Student
Dat
pansion Stud
nt: #4 Healt
ts: Mark Sly
te: Decemb
dy Comparis
th Policy Advo
yter
er 6, 2013
son Grid
ocacy