ADVANCING GENDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT: The triple nexus of gender inequality, state fragility, and climate vulnerability Sneak Peek Event Georgetown University | July 16, 2019
ADVANCING GENDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT:
The triple nexus of gender inequality,
state fragility, and climate vulnerability
Sneak Peek EventGeorgetown University | July 16, 2019
IUCN Global Programme on
Governance and Rights
IUCN GPGR’s work includes ● Strategy to further enhance and mainstream its social science capacity and its
ability to address social issues in conservation
● Focus on recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples; gender equality and the
empowerment of women; strengthening governance; and human rights
How we achieve impact● Provides technical support to members and partners in every region of the world
and across IUCN offices and programmes
● Innovative methodologies to deliver results across policymaking, advising
implementation and convening networks to forge the path towards a more
sustainable and just world
Gender equality and
women’s empowerment
o Development of sector-specific
gender tools, data and research
o Capacity building and trainings for
government ministries and
agencies, civil society, and
development organizations
o Technical expertise to support
development of frameworks on
gender-responsive approaches
and analyses
Advancing Gender in the
Environment (AGENT)
AGENT is a 10-year program launched
in 2014 by USAID and IUCN working
across E3 offices and sectors
o Increase the effectiveness of USAID's
environmental programming through
gender integration
o Improve gender equality and women's
empowerment in a range of
environmental sectors
Gender-based
violence
Fisheries
AdaptationEnergy
Forestry Urban Services
AGENT’s Impact
5,000+ women and men
policymakers trained
on gender and
environment linkages
worldwide
100+tools and knowledge
products created- including research reports,
guides, data, briefs, factsheets
and webinars
16,350+times resources
have been accessed
AGENT Adaptation – Triple Nexus
Strengthen the knowledge base on the “triple nexus” of
gender inequality, state fragility, and climate vulnerability
● Identify, analyze, and map critical indicators across each of the priority areas –
to gain an initial understanding of where these issues are most prevalent
● Literature review and consultations with USAID and other experts helped form a
framework for this research and identify indicators
USAID Definitions
Gender equality “Gender equality concerns women and men, and it involves working with men and boys, women and girls
to bring about changes in attitudes, behaviors, roles and responsibilities at home, in the workplace, and in
the community. Genuine equality means more than parity in numbers or laws on the books; it means
expanding freedoms and improving overall quality of life so that equality is achieved without sacrificing
gains for males or females.“
State fragility"Fragility refers to the extent to which state-society relations fail to produce outcomes that are considered to
be effective and legitimate.“
Climate vulnerability "Climate vulnerability is the degree to which something or someone can be harmed by or cope with a
climate stressor.”
Gender inequality – Climate vulnerability
Differentiated roles, responsibilities, access to, and control over resources
• Women and girls among poorest in the world
• Differentiated livelihood strategies dependent on natural resources
• Lack of tenure rights reduces control over land
• Unpaid labour contributes to limited capacity for paid labour or climate adaptation
activities
• Women responsible for collection of water and firewood
• Differentiated impacts of and ability to respond to natural disasters
• Differentiated levels of participation in decision-making
• Distinct knowledge and skills related to adaptation to climate change
These all contribute to greater overall climate vulnerability for women
Climate vulnerability – State fragility
Relationship is complex and multidirectional
• Climate change can contribute to conflict and act as a “threat multiplier”
• No single cause of conflict
• Climate-related events contribute to migration
• Conflict can increase climate vulnerability, fragile states lack the ability to adapt
There is a need for integrated policy responses
State fragility – Gender inequality
Gender inequality is a central feature of state fragility
• Differentiated impacts in health, education, employment, income and violence
• Women and men play multiple roles in times of war
Women are increasingly vulnerable to gender-based violence (GBV)
• Increase in political violence against women across the world
• Perpetrators of GBV include militaries, government actors, community members, and
even peacebuilding forces
Women should be recognized as being part of the solution
• Various ways in which women and men can contribute to peacebuilding efforts
• Examples of women’s successful participation
Triple Nexus
Research confirms that:
• Differentiated impacts of climate vulnerability and state fragility on women and men,
with disproportionate impacts on women and girls
• Women’s vulnerability to climate events is exacerbated by fragility and vice versa
• Women have distinct adaptive capacities and potential to act as agents of change in
climate adaptation, conflict resolution and peacebuilding
Examples of studies considering triple nexus are limited
Case study: Darfur, Sudan
• Complex set of interacting factors led to 2003 war
• Climate change, land degradation and
competition over resources claimed to be among
root causes of conflict
• Devastating human and environmental impacts
• Women and girls victims of GBV
MethodsPrevalence of the triple nexus
• Covers 122 countries: 98 USAID missions and 24 represented by regional missions
• Contains 27 quantitative country-level indicators across 6 sub-groups
• Missing data estimated: expectation-maximization algorithm and regional averages
• Data normalization for comparability: 0-1 range for each indicator
• Unweighted aggregation to calculate sub-group scores
• Average of the two sub-groups to get a score for each issue area
• Countries divided into 5 categories of triple nexus prevalence based on standard
deviation categories: very high, high, moderate, low, very low
Gender inequality indicators
Legal rights Gender parity
1. Laws against gender-based violence
2. Access to natural and economic resources
3. Inheritance rights of widows and daughters
4. Parental authority of women in marriage and divorce
5. Literacy ratio
6. Basic education ratio
7. Labor force participation ratio
8. Political representation ratio
State fragility indicators
Effectiveness Legitimacy
9. Violent conflict
10. Government effectiveness
11. Undernourishment
12. Maternal mortality
13. State use of political terror
14. Voice and accountability
15. Control of corruption
16. Child marriage
17. Social group equality
Climate vulnerability indicators
Exposure and sensitivity Adaptive capacity
18. Natural disasters
19. Urban concentration
20. Agricultural employment
21. Low elevation population
22. Water stress
23. Access to drinking water
24. Access to electricity
25. Mobile phones
26. GDP per capita
27. Biodiversity and habitat
Results: Prevalence of triple nexus issues
Results: Countries with very high
prevalence of triple nexus issues
Rank
(out of
122)
CountryGender
inequality
State
fragility
Climate
vulnerability
Triple
nexus score
1 Somalia 0.69 0.95 0.96 2.60
2 Yemen (tied) 1.00 0.79 0.78 2.57
2 South Sudan (tied) 0.69 1.00 0.88 2.57
4 Afghanistan 0.95 0.71 0.84 2.50
5 Chad 0.84 0.77 0.88 2.49
6 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.70 0.79 0.94 2.43
7 Central African Republic 0.68 0.92 0.82 2.42
8 Sudan 0.81 0.79 0.80 2.40
9 Mauritania 0.84 0.47 0.84 2.15
10 Syrian Arab Republic 0.74 0.75 0.63 2.12
Results: Top results per region
RegionRank
(of 122)Country
Gender
inequality
State
fragility
Climate
vulnerability
Triple
nexus score
Asia and the
Pacific
4 Afghanistan 0.95 0.71 0.84 2.50
13 Pakistan 0.74 0.60 0.65 1.99
17 Myanmar 0.51 0.61 0.78 1.90
Eurasia
52 Uzbekistan 0.30 0.39 0.61 1.30
63 Turkmenistan 0.31 0.44 0.45 1.20
66 Tajikistan 0.26 0.39 0.49 1.14
Latin America
and the
Caribbean
21 Haiti 0.39 0.57 0.86 1.82
74 Paraguay (tied) 0.23 0.38 0.41 1.02
74 Guatemala (tied) 0.27 0.42 0.33 1.02
Middle East and
North Africa
2 Yemen 1.00 0.79 0.78 2.57
9 Mauritania 0.84 0.47 0.84 2.15
10 Syria 0.74 0.75 0.63 2.12
Sub-Saharan
Africa
1 Somalia 0.69 0.95 0.96 2.60
2 South Sudan 0.69 1.00 0.88 2.57
5 Chad 0.84 0.77 0.88 2.49
Limitations
Country coverage
• Limited to country level
• Some countries (particularly small island states) are missing data for indicators
• Kosovo was removed from the analysis due to a lack of data for a sufficient number of indicators
• Only analyzed countries where USAID has country/regional presence
Data gaps and methodology
• Lack of data available for certain key issues (e.g., GBV)
• Persistent data gaps are a critical limiting factor for understanding the actual implementation of laws that
provide equal rights for women and men
• The results of this analysis are presented in terms of triple nexus prevalence relative to the other
countries included in the study, rather than the presence of issues under the triple nexus
Conclusions
• Issues are connected: The literature review and analysis of the framework revealed strong
evidence for the connections between triple nexus issues.
• Regions of highest prevalence: Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East and North Africa.
• Integrated approach: The findings of this study reinforce this need in addressing gender
inequality, state fragility, and climate vulnerability, in all countries included in this study.
• Co-benefits of empowering women: Ensuring women’s rights, needs, and agency is not only
a moral obligation from a human-rights perspective, but also empowering women and reducing
gender inequality contributes to more resilient, legitimate, stable, and climate-smart societies.
Recommendations and opportunities
Knowledge building
More research is needed to fill knowledge gaps and to better understand the complexity of the
interlinkages, as well as entry points for addressing them together.
Example research questions:
• Data is often lacking for small island nations, though it is known that they are particularly vulnerable to
impacts of climate change, such as sea level rise and warming and increased natural hazards, and
action is urgently needed. What are the unique vulnerabilities and adaptive capacities of small island
nations, and in what ways can women be (or are women being) agents of change to support enhanced
adaptive capacity and state resiliency?
• There currently exists a knowledge and data gap in understanding the scope of GBV in areas of high
climate and conflict vulnerability. What quantitative and qualitative data can be collected and analyzed to
support closing this data gap?
• How have policies and narratives of climate change, migration and conflict affected international and
national priorities and action to mitigate these challenges?
Recommendations and
opportunitiesProgramming
• Upon identifying the specific drivers within a country
that contribute to issues of gender inequality, state
fragility, and climate vulnerability, integrated
approaches can be better tailored for and targeted to
addressing these issues and can support sustainable
development goals.
• Investing in convening actors working on each of these
three issues, as well as data and statistics experts,
should be a priority in developing and implementing
effective policies to increase knowledge and enact
positive change.
Recommendations and opportunitiesPolicy
• It is imperative that the international policy agenda raises awareness and addresses these three
issues and the interlinkages between them. This can support the goals of donor and
development agencies and international institutions working on advancing progress on each or
all of these areas, including as related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
• Dialogue and awareness around the
interlinkages between gender inequality,
state fragility and climate vulnerability are
important as opportunities to address the
three issues in an integrated manner,
including in policy development and
implementation.
Next steps
• Peer review is being finalized
• Fall 2019 – Paper launch
• October 2019 – Present the paper at the first International Conference on
Environmental Peacebuilding
• Exploring building on this research with more regional or country specific “deep dives”
Thank youAcknowledgements:
Ruta Aidis
Craig Beatty
Cate Owren
Corinne Hart
Pete Epanchin
Jennifer Hawkins
Chai Shenoy
Peer reviewers:
Ali Raza
Nastaran Moosavi
Galeo Saintz
Elaine Hsiao
Seline Meijer, Ph.D. – [email protected]
Emmett Boyer, M.Sc. – [email protected]
Molly Gilligan, M.Sc. – [email protected]
Special thanks to the Georgetown Institute
for Women, Peace and Security (GIWPS)
Jennifer Parsons
Allie Smith
@IUCN_Gender
#AGENT_usaid
@GIWPS