Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives 1 SURA Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives SURA Dr. Donald R. Riley Vice President and CIO University.

1

Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives

Advanced Network InfrastructureInitiatives

SURASURA

Dr. Donald R. RileyVice President and CIO

University of Maryland, College Park

November 5, 2002

2


Research and Development

Commercialization

Partnerships

Privatization

Today’s Internet

Internet2 and ‘NGI’

OperationalR&E efforts

Source: Ivan Moura Campos

Research &Experimental

Nets

The Network Development ‘Spiral’The Network Development ‘Spiral’

Diffusion/AdoptionProcess

3


Internet2Backbone Networks

GigaPoPOne

Internet2 Network ArchitectureInternet2 Network ArchitectureGigaPoP

Two

GigaPoPFour

GigaPoPThree

4


Internet2 Network ArchitectureInternet2 Network Architecture

Internet2 InterconnectCloud

GigaPoPOne

Regional Network

University C

CommercialInternetConnections

University B

University A

Sacramento

Los Angeles

Washington

STAR TAP/Star LightAPAN/TransPAC, Ca*net3, CERN, CERnet, FASTnet, GEMnet, IUCC, KOREN/KREONET2, NORDUnet, RNP2, SURFnet, SingAREN, TAnet2

NYCMBELNET, CA*net3,

GEANT*,HEANET,

JANET, NORDUnet

Pacific WaveAARNET, APAN/TransPAC, CA*net3, TANET2

SNVAGEMNET, SINET, SingAREN, WIDE

LOSAUNINET

AMPATHREUNA, RNP2

RETINA (ANSP)

OC3-OC12

El Paso (UACJ-UT El Paso)CUDI

San Diego (CALREN2)CUDI

* ARNES, CARNET, CESnet, DFN, GRNET, RENATER, RESTENA, SWITCH, HUNGARNET, GARR-B, POL-34, RCCN, RedIRIS

09 January 2002

Internet2 Abilene International PeeringInternet2 Abilene International Peering

6


NSF Three Network ModelNSF Three Network Model

Electrical Optical

Electrical toOptical Conversion

Circuit switchesPacket switchesIP RoutersATM, Ethernet,etc

SONETPacket over

SONET

Lambda switchingOptical packet switchingOptical burst switchingMEMS, Holography,etc

Abilene NSF ExperimentalNetwork

NSF ResearchNetwork

7


CyberInfrastructureCyberInfrastructureNSF Blue Ribbon PanelNSF Blue Ribbon Panel

Recognition of the new requirement of infrastructure to support leading edge science and research

Dependence on technology for future scientific advances Cyberinfastructure capabilities include

computational power and high speed networks distributed, ad hoc and embedded sensor networks and arrays large data repositories systemic security large-scale interoperability and collaborative tools middleware

8


CyberInfrastructure: Future Infrastructure CyberInfrastructure: Future Infrastructure

The “last mile problem” continues and is especially serious for HBCUs, Tribal Colleges and Universities, and Hispanic institutions

Research-group and departmental-scale facilities (100 to 1000x less powerful than national centers) are becoming increasingly important; thus, national centers need to be a factor of 100 to 1000x more capable

High speed networks with high quality of service continue to be foundational to research and education at all levels

On-demand (not pre-scheduled) and instantaneous access is becoming increasingly important (computers, data bases, networks)

9


CyberInfrastructure: Future InfrastructureCyberInfrastructure: Future Infrastructure

Comprehensive environments are needed for linking models from multiple disciplines and for synthesizing results in interoperable frameworks

The Computational Grid represents an important opportunity for the future and should receive high priority for support

Inexpensive and reliable tools are needed to support distance collaborations

Higher levels of security are needed

10


Grid ComputingGrid Computing Computational Grids are …

are enabling technology that permit the transparent coupling of geographically-dispersed resources (machines, networks, data storage, visualization devices, and scientific instruments) for large-scale distributed applications.

provide several important benefits for users and applications: convenient interfaces to remote resources, resource coupling for resource intensive distributed applications and remote collaboration, and resource sharing.

embody the confluence of high performance parallel computing, distributed computing, and Internet computing, in support of “big science.”

11


TeraGrid Computing ProgramTeraGrid Computing Program TeraGrid Is…

A collaborative endeavor a single project with four sites

Argonne, Caltech, NCSA and SDSC

A new model for computational science distributed, collaborative resources bootstrapping of a new infrastructure

A production, national service transition to and support for Grid applications A collaborative endeavor

12


NSF’s Distributed Terascale Facility (DTF)NSF’s Distributed Terascale Facility (DTF)

Source: Rick Stevens 12/2001

Now, plus Pittsburg Supercomputer Center

13


TeraGrid BackplaneTeraGrid Backplane

NCSA/UIUC

ANL

UICMultiple Carrier Hubs

Starlight / NW Univ

Ill Inst of Tech

Univ of ChicagoSt Louis GigaPoP

I-WIRE

StarLightInternational Optical Peering Point

(see www.startap.net)

Los Angeles

San Diego

TeraGrid Backplane Chicago

IndianapolisSt. LouisUrbana

OC-48 (2.5 Gb/s, Abilene)

Multiple 10 GbE (Qwest)

Multiple 10 GbE (I-WIRE Dark Fiber)

• Solid lines in place and/or available by October 2001• Dashed I-WIRE lines planned for Summer 2002

Charlie Catlett – Argonne National Laboratory ([email protected])

Need (and ability:-) to provide access to DTF core nodes (as per new DTF-ETF architecture) rj .

14


Next Wave: State/Regional Optical Next Wave: State/Regional Optical Networks - and InternationalNetworks - and International

UCAID/Internet2 Optical Backbone project California ONI led by CENIC Pacific LightRail and Pacific LightWave led by Univ.

of Washington and CENIC Illinois iWire Indiana I-Light MAX, SoX, NetVa next gen., NCREN NoX, Ohio-led multi-state NSF-sponsored “International Lambda” discussions HENP Next-generation ESNet deliberations, etc. Texas? Florida?

15


TeraGrid Concept ala IllinoisTeraGrid Concept ala Illinois

TeraGrid Concept ala U. TeraGrid Concept ala U. WashingtonWashington

draft 12/4/01

Critical Mass SitesTop 10 Res. Univ.:Next 15 Res. Univ:Centers, Labs:Intl. 10gig & Key Hubs

• Leverage Regional Connections• Incent fatter/dedicated pipes• Enable significant e2e• Connect Scientists/Labs/Devices• Establish MetaPop Centers

draft 11/12/01

Where the (reachable) Research isWhere the (reachable) Research is

Johns Hopkins (w/APL)U. of WashingtonStanfordU. of MichiganUCSDU. of Pennsylvania UCLAMITHarvardUCSFU. of Colorado (all)

Top 251 Research Universities in Total, Federal, Peer Reviewed, Contract and Grant Obligations1

[all > $250 million/yr & top few > $500 million/yr]

btw – PACIFIC LIGHTRAIL alone has 3 of top 5, half of top 10 (& 6 of top 11)

Wisconsin ColumbiaYaleCornellMinnesotaWashington U.DukeUNC

UCBPittsburgPenn State USCCal. TechIllinois

1. Variations in how to count and financial period causes minor variations in order and inclusion at bottom end 2. Obligations lag Awards – the list of Awards is almost identical but numbers are higher

Plus major, reachable net oriented centers, labs etc. like LBL etc. and DTF nodes!

e.g.

18


GSFC NLM

NOAA

UMCP

NIH

UMBC

SURA

GU

CU ETC

HHMI

GWU

NSF

UCDC UCAIDSMTH CENS

NCSAUSM

Abilene

Net.Work.VaNet.Work.Md

ISP

National/InternationalPeering Networks

Regional NetworkParticipants

InstitutionalParticipants

ATDNet

VBNS

NGIX-East

DREN

NISN

NRENESNet

MAXMAXRegional

Infrastructure

SuperNet

Mid-Atlantic Crossroads (concept)Mid-Atlantic Crossroads (concept)

19

JETnets Interconnections and PeeringJETnets Interconnections and Peering

MAE-EastvBNS@DS3

NISN@DS3

DREN@OC3

ESnet@DS3

NGIX-CH (AADS)Abilene@OC12

vBNS@OC12

NREN@OC3

NISN@OC3

DREN@OC3

ESnet@OC3

Sprint NY-NAPvBNS@DS3

NISN@DS3

DREN@OC3

ESnet@DS3

MCIW-PYMvBNS@OC3

NISN @OC3

ESnet@OC3

NGIX-DC/MAXAbilene@OC12 vBNS

@OC12

NREN@OC12

NISN@OC3

DREN@OC3

ESnet@OC3

SDSC

vBNS@OC12

ESnet@DS3

Seattle

Abilene@Gig-E

DREN@Gig-E

NGIXPublic Exchange PointPrivate Exchange Point

peering in placepeering planned

JETnet: connected to the exchange point JETnet: plan to connect to the exchange point Created by Javad Boroumand, updated 24 AUG 01 by JJ Jamison

FIX/MAE-West (Ames)

NISN@OC3

DREN@OC3

ESnet@DS3

NREN@OC3

MAX@OC48 USGS

@250Mb

SuperNet@OC48

NLM@OC12

LA

Abilene@OC48

Supernet@OC48

NGIX-SF (Ames)Abilene@OC12

vBNS@OC3

NREN@OC12

NISN@OC3

DREN@OC3

ESnet@OC3

Sunnyvale

Abilene@OC12

ESnet@OC12

20


MAX – ATDnet Cooperative ProjectMAX – ATDnet Cooperative Project

ATDnet(V2) Ring TopologyBasic configuration using Qwest to reach LTS

ECK

DARPA

GWU

WNY

DIA

UMD

NRL

GSFC

DISA

LTS

Govt supplied fiber

Cross-connectFiber bundle

Primary siteAncillary siteQwest fiberFibergate fiber

All routes are 2 strands fiberQwest routes are Lucent TruewaveFibergate routes are SMF28

ATDnet (Advanced Technology Demonstration Network) is a high performance networkinig testbed Established by DARPA Enables collaboration between defense and other fereral agencies

ATDnet comprised of federal research labs + MAX NRL, DIA, DISA, LTS, NASA, DARPA, MAX

MAX managing a research testbed network in collaboration with ADTnet

MAX participants eligible to

submit network experiment

proposals to ATDnet

21


SURA Opportunities:SURA Opportunities:Southeastern University Research AssociationSoutheastern University Research Association

SURA Goals: Strengthen research capacity of Southeastern U.S. universities and ability to attract federal R&D funding 501(c)3 consortium of 59 research universities from 16 southeastern

US states and DC Founded in 1980 to develop Jefferson Lab, a DOE-funded high

energy physics facility Created one of the first NSF funded regional network services,

SURANet; sold in 1995 to BBN Major initiatives

Jefferson Lab Regional Infrastructure Initiative (Crossroads) SCOOP - SURA Coastal Ocean Observing Program ….

Increasing support of So. Governors Association

22


SURA Regional Infrastructure Initiative:Potential Telecom & Utility Company Partnership

23


24


SURA-led National Buyers ConsortiumSURA-led National Buyers Consortium Goal: National fiber infrastructure owned by R&E community

25


SURA-led National Buyers ConsortiumSURA-led National Buyers Consortium

Goal: National fiber infrastructure owned by R&E community

Leading-Edge e2e services & experimentalnetwork facilities via MetaPoPs and inter-gigapop links for research & next gen. tech., arch., grids, DTF expansion, content, sensors, apparatus …Up to 40 dedicated 10 gigabit waves with up to hundreds of dedicated gigabit links system-wide.

8/14/02

10 gbsTycom IEEAF

donation

10 gbsTycomIEEAF

Donation

MetaPoPs & Core Nodes

ADM sites

Desired Expansion PoPs/ADM

National LightRail” (NLR)

International Broadband

Metro/WAN owned Fiber ‘Rings' connecting strategic R&E endpoints.

PIT

BOS

NY

DC

LA

SUN

SEA

DEN

CHI

National LightRail: cost-effective owned lit R&E fiber fabric

ATL

CLV?

Canariefabric

Raleigh?

Initial footprint 3/03

27


11,000 miles

Lit National NLR Core Fabric Fiber

C. D.

7-28-02 ronj

5,207 miles A. B. 9,342 miles

28


National Fiber InitiativeNational Fiber Initiative

National Light Rail UCAID Board Resolution: “National Fiber

Opportunity Project” SURA-UCAID-National Buyers Consortium:

AT&T Opportunity

29


SURA-SGA OpportunitiesSURA-SGA Opportunities Leverage

MAX, SoX, NetVa, NCREN and other state/regional initiatives federal labs and initiatives National R&E networking initiatives

Position SURA and region for evolving national and international initiatives

Develop multi-purpose, multi-sector network to leverage investments, create infrastructure

New opportunities for leadership role, including economic development opportunities

Invest for the future

30


Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives 1 SURA Advanced Network Infrastructure Initiatives SURA Dr. Donald R. Riley Vice President and CIO University.

Documents

strands fiberqwest routes

smf28 qwest routes

total recuring

smf28basic configuration

g operations

152sheet2modified basic

smf28desired topo

year outlay