Top Banner
1 Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K
34

Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

Dec 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Loreen Gilbert
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

1

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Blade transmissibility by FEA

Justin Greenhalgh,

Rutherford Appleton Lab

LSC, March 2004

LIGO-G040058-00-K

Page 2: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

2

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Contents

• Report– Motivation– Background– Results– Next steps

• Discussion– Is this the right way to go?– Any caveats etc?

Page 3: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

3

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Background

• Norna (ALUKGLA0010) showed that the isolation in the quads (and triples?) will be OK provided that the internal modes of the different blades are high enough and do not coincide.

• Ken went on to assert (ALUKGLA0007) that high enough meant about 40 Hz.

• Picture from Norna.• Will the blades give adequate isolation?• In particular, will the peaks in transmissibility caused

by the internal modes overlap?• And what is the effect of the mass of the wire clamps?

Page 4: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

4

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

From Norna’s paper:

Page 5: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

5

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Page 6: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

6

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

• So – find the actual transmissibility of the blades and multiply by the curves above (updated). (Even better, reproduce the curves above PLUS blade internal modes).

Page 7: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

7

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Run through T040024

• Modal analysis of reference blade• Modal analysis of blade from Conceptual design• Harmonic

– No damping (cf Norna’s plot)– With damping, various damping ratios

• Test effect of changing alpha on internal modes• Prestress• Add wire• Effect of wire clamp mass

Page 8: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

8

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

T040024

• Pretty simple stuff over Christmas• Uses ANSYS macro language for ease of “what if”

scenarios• Simple to write macros so that a command of the

form – bf1,.48,.0045,.096,.01,20,1,1000,.050,11

• Will find the eigenvalues of a blade 0.48m long, 0.0045 thick, .096 root width, 0.01m tip width, find up to 20 eigenmodes in the range 1 to 1000 Hz, with .05kg wire clamp and 11kg mass.

Page 9: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

9

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

T040024

• ANSYS will find– Eigenvalues and normal mode shapes– Transmissibility in a given frequency range and

linear frequency step

Page 10: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

10

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

What equations is the FE solving?

• Modal analysis

• Harmonic analysis

• Damping

Page 11: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

11

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

FE equations

• So, use 1/(2Q) as the damping value in the ANSYS DMPRAT command.

Page 12: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

12

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Modal analysis of reference blade

• Modal analysis of “reference” blade• Frequency has been measured at 55 Hz

Page 13: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

13

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Page 14: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

14

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Modal analysis of blade from Conceptual design

Page 15: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

15

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Effect of adding mass at blade tip

• 11 kg mass at blade tip

Page 16: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

16

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Harmonic

• No damping• With damping, various damping ratios

Page 17: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

17

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Harmonic – with damping

• “Zoom in” on peak by specifying restricted frequency range

Page 18: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

18

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Extended frequency range

Page 19: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

19

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Varying damping ratios

Page 20: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

20

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Test effect of changing shape on internal modes

Page 21: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

21

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Varying length and root width - 1

Page 22: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

22

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Varying length and root width - 2

Page 23: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

23

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Prestress

With Without

Little/no effect, as expected

Page 24: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

24

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Add wire

Wire constrained laterally

Page 25: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

25

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Mode shapes

Do any of these tie up with this peak?

Page 26: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

26

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Page 27: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

27

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Page 28: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

28

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Effect of wire clamp mass

Page 29: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

29

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Note T040025

• Revised dimensions• Easy changes allows look at a set of blades• NB resolution of peak• Results so far

Page 30: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

30

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

T040025 - Model

Page 31: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

31

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Resolving the peaks…

• All three blades are analysed at a background range plus an “zoom” range for each one:

Page 32: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

32

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

T040025 – typical results

Page 33: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

33

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Next

• So far – simply testing out the methods + tools• Next – get more detailed/serious

– Reference to this group – am I doing anything silly?– Check this method can reproduce Husman results– Get latest blade/wire dimensions– Check transmissibility vs measurements

• Calum’s thesis?• Elsewhere?

– Cross check with more detailed FE models (RAJ, MPL, others?)

– Explore effect of clamp mass again– Model sloping wires– What other effects to bear in mind?

Page 34: Advanced LIGO UK G040060-00-K 1 Blade transmissibility by FEA Justin Greenhalgh, Rutherford Appleton Lab LSC, March 2004 LIGO-G040058-00-K.

34

Advanced LIGO UK

G040060-00-K

Discussion points

• Reference to this group – am I doing anything silly?• Check transmissibility vs measurements

– Calum’s thesis?– Elsewhere?

• Cross check with more detailed FE models (RAJ, MPL, others?)

• Explore effect of clamp mass again• Does this include “Norna’s curves” or do those need

to be added in to the results?• What other effects to bear in mind?