Defense Acquisition Challenge Program (DACP): Aerogel for Ships:
Fire barrier, IR Suppression, Blast Mitigation, Decreased Weight,
Volume, Installation Costs, and Fuel Savings.Title IIIs Laser
Protective Eyewear project established a domestic supplier for high
performance infrared coatings for spectacles, goggles and visors.
Advanced Systems & Concepts Rapidly Placing Relevant, Mature
Technology into the Hands of Joint and Coalition Warfighters
AS&C Partners with Services & Agencies to: Match technology
to warfighting needs lab and industry outreach
Overcome resistance to transformational concepts
Ensure technology contributes to joint/ coalition
capabilities
Provide joint warfighters with options for integrating service
capabilities
Transfer DoD technology to the private sector: An industry
on-ramp and access to meeting warfighter needsDoDs Resource for
Technology TransitionArea Cruise Missile Defense (ACMD) ACTD
integrates civilian and military sensors into a single air-defense
common operational picture. VideoFAAJoint Based Expeditionary
Connectivity Center (JBECC)Tactical RadarExisting LandlinesJoint
Surveillance System RadarsCANADAPatriotDACPDPA Title
IIIACTDTTITechnology Transition Initiative (TTI) used DARPAs Water
Purification Pen technology to accelerate the technology fielding
to Afghanistan, Iraq, and Tsunami Victims.
Advanced Systems and Concepts
ACTDs rapidly field emergent mature technologies to joint
warfightersBalanced emphasis on tailoring technology with
associated Tactics, Techniques, & Procedures (TTPs) to user
needs Primary customers for ACTDs are joint Combatant
CommandersJoint, Coalition, & transformational opportunities
are prioritiesACTDs require a Lead Service/Agency and a CoCom
Sponsor ACTDs are not an acquisition/procurement programCharter is
to minimize processes that delay rapid fielding of demonstrations
Overcoming resistance to transformational conceptsRack & Stack
voting process used to select Candidate slate inside the Planning,
Programming, Budgeting & Execution (PPBE) processExample: FY
2006 selection is in process nowACTD Support to Joint Combatant
Commanders
*
FY 2006 AS&C Resources Overview(Direct Oversight of $325M)
as of Feb 2005Source: FY 2006 Presidents Budget RDT&E/DW: $311M
DPA Title III Procurement: $13M OSD Maj Equip-JCTD Procure: $1M
Program$MAdvanced Concept Technology Demonstration
(ACTD)(BA-3)$164Joint Capability Technology Demonstration
(JCTD)(BA-3/4/5 & Procure)$40Joint Warfighting Program
(JWP)-BA-3$10Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT)-BA-6$36Defense
Production Act (DPA) Title III$13Technology Transition Initiative
(TTI)-BA-3$30TechLink (BA-3)$3Defense Acquisition Challenge Pgm
(DACP)-BA-5$29
Chart1
163649
40000
10205
35738
13573
29718
3435
28975
FY-06
ALL AS&C-PBR 06
ALL AS&C DIRECT RESOURCE EXECUTION (11 Active Program
Elements)
Last Update: Feb 7, 2005
PA&EPA&EPA&EPB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06
AS&C OPR Responsbility in
bluePEFY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07FY-08FY-09FY-10FY-11
PROGRAMBAActualActualActualCurrent EstCurrent
EstPB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06
ACTD:30603750D8Z118,819157,762195,136212,570212,915163,649163,744174,549174,788179,239184,216
JCTD:30603648D8Z35,00035,00035,00035,00035,00035,000
JCTD: (Transition):40604648D8Z3,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,000
Defense Acq
Executive:50605648D8Z1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000
OSD Major Equip
(JCTD):P-10902198D8Z1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000
JWP:30603727D8Z7,5387,5368,8509,94910,69610,20510,47611,20911,23111,46111,724
COSSI:70604805D8Z9,54122,73515,5040.00.00.00.00.00.0
Tech Link (New
PE)30603942D8Z0.00.00.03,4307,9853,4353,4333,5703,4983,6433,698
FCT:60605130D8Z31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,41938,27838,27139,04939,942
DPA Title III: (Executed by
USAF)P0904903D8Z2,97239,52971,94777,43742,76513,5735,3845,5125,6345,7665,888
FY-06
Defense Challenge Program
(DACP)50604051D8Z25,11628,97529,23829,61930,40031,11131,791ACTD163,64950%
JCTD40,00012%
JWP10,2053%
QRSP Total: (DDR&E
OPR)30603826D8Z24,07671,35241,929110,717111,026115,395114,248115,788117,333FCT35,73811%
Tech Transition Initiative (TTI)3Proj:
8296,01912,72920,46629,71829,92631,28731,34532,09932,841DPA Title
III13,5734%
Defense Challenge Program (DACP)3Proj:
82712,03817,0930.00.00.00.00.0TTI29,7189%
Quick Reaction Fund (DDR&E)3Proj:
8266,01915,52221,46380,99981,10084,10882,90383,68984,492Tech
Link3,4351%
Rapid Reaction Fund (DDR&E)3Proj:
82835,20034,91975,0000.00.00.00.0DACP28,9759%
325,293100%
Total AS&C Direct
Controls:170,275262,401338,813369,164356,776325,293318,620334,024335,167342,368350,100
Total does not include Gray DDR&E Funding lines: QRF and
RRF
&R&"Arial,Bold"Point of Contact:&"Arial,Regular"Mark
Peterson. 695-7937
&L&Z&F&R&A
ALL AS&C-PBR 06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY-06
FY-2006 AS&C Direct Resource ExecutionFY-2006 Pres Bud
Submit-(Feb 2005)$325 M
OTT Funding
OTT Funding Current Estimate FY2005 PRESBUD
Last Update: July 2004
NEEDS UPDATING TO PBR-06
PB-04PB-05PB-05PB-05These $$ figures are Linked to the Main
Spreadsheet
($ in Thousands)FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05
APPROPOTTFY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05
COSSI: (0604805)22,73515,5040.00.0COSSI22,73515,5040.00.0
COSSI Total:22,73515,5040.00.0Dual
Use30,46210,07510,4965,151
Dual Use (by Service)MANTECH227,909216,851253,001249,743
Army: (0602805A)10,0450.00.00.0TTI0.06,01913,25121,463
Navy: (0602805N)10,0000.00.00.0TECH Link1,0001,5003,5478,084
Air Force (0602805F)10,41710,07510,4965,151DPA Title
III39,52971,94777,43742,765
DUAL USE
Total:30,46210,07510,4965,151Total:321,635321,896357,732327,206
MANTECH (by Service)
Army: 0708045A61,05979,06685,85391,886
Navy: 0708011N70,32671,70464,27060,365
Air Force: 0708011F55,69445,34057,00757,212
DLA: 0708011S40,83020,74145,87140,280
MANTECH Total:227,909216,851253,001249,743
Tech Trans Initiative (TTI):
(0603826D8Z)0.06,01913,25121,463
TTI Total:0.06,01913,25121,463
Tech Link: (0603942D8Z)0.00.03,5478,084
TECH LINK Total:1,0001,5003,5478,084
DPA Title IIII: (0904903D8Z)39,52971,94777,43742,765
DPA Title III Total:39,52971,94777,43742,765
Tech Transfer (NATIBO)0.00.00.00.0
OTT Oversight funding Total:321,635321,896357,732327,206
&L&Z&F&A&RLast Printed&D
OTT Funding
00000
00000
00000
00000
COSSI
Dual Use
MANTECH
TECH Link
DPA Title III
Dollars in Thousands
OTT Resource OversightFY-05 Appropriated (Not Adjusted for
Congressional Reductions)
CTO Funding
CTO Funding FY2006 PRESBUD
Last Update: February 2005
PA&EPA&EPB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06These $$ figures are Linked
to the Main Spreadsheet
($ in
Thousands)FY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07CTOFY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07
FCT: (PE
0605130D8Z)31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,419FCT31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,419
FCT
Total:31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,419DACP0.00.012,03817,09325,11628,97529,238
DACP: (New FY05 PE
0604051D8Z)0.00.012,03817,09325,11628,97529,238Total:31,40534,83941,35753,04961,94964,71365,657
DUAL USE Total:0.012,03817,09325,11628,97529,238
OTT Oversight funding
Total:34,83941,35753,04961,94964,71365,657
Note: Techlink OSD PE is new starting in FY-04. Prior years
funding was through a DARPA Program Element and executed by the
USAF.
&L&Z&F&A&RLast Printed&D
CTO Funding
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
FCT
DACP
Dollars in Thousands
CTO Office
BES FY2006
ALL AS&C DIRECT RESOURCE EXECUTION (7 Program Elements)
Last Update: Nov 15, 2004
PB04PB05PB05APPNBES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06
AS&C OPR Responsbility in
bluePEFY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07FY-08FY-09FY-10FY-11
PROGRAMBAActualActualCurrent EstCurrent
EstAPPROP.BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06FY-04
ACTD:30603750D8Z157,762195,136218,167219,001195,748198,614202,774208,265213,141217,654ACTD218,167
JWP10,284
JWP:30603727D8Z7,5368,85010,28410,9369,92510,20110,59610,88311,13811,374COSSI0.0
FCT36,464
COSSI:70604805D8Z22,73515,5040.00.00.00.00.00.0DPA Title
III77,437
TTI13,251
Tech Link (New
PE)30603942D8Z0.00.03,5478,0842,1732,1792,1662,1842,2352,282Tech
Link3,547
DACP17,793
FCT:60605130D8Z34,83929,31936,46435,63334,92035,65536,37537,28938,16238,970
DPA Title III: (Executed by
USAF)P0904903D8Z39,52971,94777,43742,76513,5735,3845,5125,6345,7665,888
FY-05
Defense Challenge Program
(DACP)50604051D8Z0.00.00.025,71328,97529,23829,68930,48231,19631,857ACTD219,00160%
JWP10,9363%
QRSP Total: (DDR&E
OPR)30603826D8Z0.024,07646,56642,92657,95058,47659,37860,96462,39263,714FCT35,63310%
Tech Transition Initiative (TTI)3Proj:
8290.06,01913,25121,46328,97529,23829,68930,48231,19631,857DPA
Title III42,76512%
Defense Challenge Program (DACP)3Proj:
8270.012,03817,7930.00.00.00.00.0TTI21,4636%
Quick Reaction Fund (DDR&E)Proj:
8260.06,01915,52221,46328,97529,23829,68930,48231,19631,857Tech
Link8,0842%
Rapid Reaction Fund (DDR&E)Proj:
8280.035,20034,9190.00.00.00.00.0DACP25,7137%
363,595
Total AS&C Direct
Controls:262,401338,813376,943363,595314,289310,509316,801325,219332,834339,882
Total does not include Gray DDR&E Funding lines: QRF and
RRF
&R&"Arial,Bold"Point of Contact:&"Arial,Regular"Mark
Peterson. 695-7937
&L&Z&F&R&A
BES FY2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FY-05
FY-2005 AS&C Direct Resource ExecutionFY-2005
Appropriation$364M
Operation Allied Force
KosovoACTIVE ACTDs Deployed in Recent
ConflictsAfghanistanOperation Enduring Freedom Active Network
Intrusion Defense X Adaptive Battlespace Awareness X X Boundary
Step X Coalition Theater Logistics X X Comm/Navigation Outage
Forecast System X X X X X Computerized Operational MASINT Weather X
X X Contamination Avoid at Seaports of Debarkation X Expendable
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle X X Ground-to-Air Passive Surveillance X
Homeland Security Command & Control X Joint Adv Health &
Usage Monitoring System X Joint Area Clearance X X Joint Distance
Support & Response X Joint Explosive Ordnance Disposal X X
Joint Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance X Language
& Speech Exploitation Resources X X Overwatch X Pathfinder X X
Personnel Recovery Extraction Survivability X Restoration of
Operations X Spartan X SIGINT Processing XTheater Support Vessel X
XThermobarics X
OAF OEF OIF NE O Active ACTDs Used in Recent ConflictsDec
2004
*
ACTD Historical Funding ProfileBudget Vs. AppropriationDollars
in MillionsStarting in FY 2001 Congress fully supports ACTD Budget
RequestFY-06ACTD & JCTD
Advanced Systems and Concepts
Can the Current ACTD businessprocess be improved? Current
ModelAll other Sources (~70%)OSD AS&C Cash Resources
(~30%)ArmyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxNavyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxUSAFPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxUSMCPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxAgencyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxNon-DoD
AgenciesCoCOMSupportCoalitionPartnersChallenges:Front-end
(start-up) and tail-end (transition) funding issues create serious
PPBE challenges.Little incentive for Service participation as New
ACTDs create immediate unfundeds.Significant start-up and
demonstration delays after JROC decision: Avg 6 month delay waiting
for Implementation Agreements.Many different Program Elements fund
ACTDs (Little visibility at Service levelaccountability challenges)
Projects require sustained commitment of resources once
initiated.Unfunded Requirements (UFRs) during execution cause
significant risk and disruption as OSD tries to share the UFRs with
stakeholders.Even successful demonstrations risk waiting 2 years
(or more) for resources to be programmed via rigid PPBE
process.Goal is to initiate ACTDs within months of a JROC approval.
However, two year PPBE process creates Service challenge in funding
new ACTDs. (Difficult to achieve before the third year)
*
ACTDTime is right to take the best parts of the ACTD program and
initiate a new business modelthe Joint Capability Technology
Demonstration (JCTD) JCTD developed based on:GAO Audit (2002):
Break traditional barriers to transition joint technologiesDefense
Science Board (2003): Strengthen the CoCom influenceJoint
Capability Study (2004 Aldridge Study): Better joint business
modelsInternal OSD direction (2004-2005): SECDEF/CJCS: Joint has
become the rule--is no longer an occasional luxury --- Rapidly
changing environment and Global War on Terror (GWOT) has created
the need to develop Joint capabilities more rapidlyEnhance the ACTD
program & provide better visibility of fundingLeverage the
Joint Capabilities Integrated Development System (JCIDS process) to
establish an improved process for transitioning ACTDs to
acquisition programs Congressional influence (2005) : Maintain
focus on the acceleration of innovative, relevant capabilities to
meet most critical warfighter needsJCTDThe JCTD program was
initiated in the FY 2006 Presidents Budget3-5 year transition
*
DUSD (AS&C) Direct FundingACTD & JCTD Programs(Actuals
& FY 2006 Presidents Budget)As of February 2005JCTD program
initiated in FY 2006. Three to five year transition from ACTD to
JCTD JCTDs are resourced in RDT&E/DW (BA-3, BA-4, BA-5) and
Procurement accounts
*
JCTD/ACTD OSD Funding(FY 2006 Presidents Budget$M)Beginning in
FY 2006, initiation of the JCTD process. 3-5 year transition
periodOSD Shifts $40M from ACTD to JCTD to initiate the program
ACTD and JCTD Program Funding
SummaryAPNBAPEFY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07Advanced Concept Technology
Demonstration (ACTD)RDT&E30603750D8Z212.570 212.915 163.649
163.744
Joint Capability Technology Demonstration
(JCTD)RDT&E30603648D8Z35.00035.000Joint Capability Technology
Demonstration (JCTD)RDT&E40604648D8Z3.0003.000Defense
Acquisition Executive (JCTD Pilot
Program)RDT&E50605648D8Z1.0001.000Procurement (JCTD Pilot),
Major Equipment- OSD Def WideProc10902198D8Z1.0001.000Total
JCTD:40.00040.000Total ACTD and JCTD213213203204
Advanced Systems and Concepts
New Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) business
process Proposed Funding ModelNon-DoD
AgenciesCoCOMSupportCoalitionPartners First two years of Resources
fenced by OSD Held in OSD PE. Most compelling JCTDs will be
resourced (incentive created)Year 3 (if necessary) funded by all
stakeholdersTransition Year funded by OSDallow time for Services to
POM for transitionOSD can afford more risk protecting scarce
resources.DARPA funds included in centralization model to cement
partnership between development and transition Unfunded
requirements easier to address without Service or Comptroller
intensive reprogramming actions in year of execution New Model will
provide clear visibility of total JCTD Cash budgeted and executed
(OSD/C, Congressional & GAO concern)Defense Acquisition
Executive (DAE) pilot program for selected JCTDs post
BA-4.AgencyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxFYDP Timeline (Based on 3 year
Demo Phase)DAE Pilot programBA-5 (0605648D8Z)
-------------------OSD Maj EquipProcurement(0902198D8Z)JCTD
OverviewLimited number of Selected Joint Peculiar JCTDs may enter
the DAE Pilot program. Most JCTDs will Transition through normal
processes.
*
ACTD-JCTD Wing Walk Enhancing the Business Model for the Joint
Customer
Combatant Commander remains the Primary CustomerAdvance Concept
Technology Demonstration (ACTD)Joint Capability Technology
Demonstration (JCTD) Final Demonstration: 3-4 years Final
Demonstration: 2 3 years with spiraled-out capabilities. Impact:
Mature capabilities demonstrated to the joint warfighter faster.
Challenging ACTD selection process: CoCom near-term versus rigid
PPBE 2 year resource process. Greater CoCom Focus through JCTD
Selection Process: Stakeholders have decision in resource
allocation for funds already set-aside.Impact: JCTDs maintain
relevancy/purposely resourced for success. OSD provides limited
funds: Services required to break programs to fund new
capabilities.JCTD Resources (Quick Start): OSD provides majority
Service funding for the first two years of the JCTD.Impact:
Accelerate JCTD initiation and increase funding stability.
Difficult to track ACTD funding in Service lines (multiple Program
Elements). JCTD-specific Program Elements Created. Impact: Increase
funding accountability and tracking. Provides time for Services to
POM for selected JCTDs. ACTDs face difficult Transition challenges,
creating joint & coalition orphans. JCTD Transition stability:
Funding across the Acquisition process. DAE pilot program Impact:
Prevents delays and provides a strong advocate for joint orphaned
capabilities.
*
Performance Metric ComparisonACTD vs. JCTDSource: FY 2006
Presidents Budget
Performance MetricACTDJCTDProject Selection FocusThreat Based:
Shared Military Service and CoCom influenceCapability Based:
Greater CoCom influence looking at nearer term joint/coalition
needs..Spiral TechnologiesNo Metric currently establishedSpiral
Technology available within one year of JCTD initiation.Final
Demonstration Completed (Starting Point: Approved ID)3 to 4 years
after initiation (Implementation Directive (ID) Signed)50%
completed by the end of the 2nd year. All JCTDs completed by the
end of the 3rd year.Shared Funding and Visibility of resourcesOSD
provides no more than 30% of the budgeted resources. Funding
provided from many different program elements.OSD provide
significantly more funding (more than 50% depending on cost of the
JCTD), especially in the first two years.Military Utility
Assessment (MUA) conducted by an independent activityMUA
traditionally tied to a specific planned exercise for
evaluationJCTDs not necessarily tied to an exercise. Greater
flexibility to establish military utility via operational
real-world demonstration or specifically designed
test/venueTransition of technology70% of ACTDs transition at least
one product to sustainment80% of JCTDs transition at least 50% of
their products to sustainment
*
Why Evolve ACTDs To JCTDs Now?Its the right thing to do: (ADM
Fargo, USPACOM)CoCom customers need an early voice in needs process
that responds quickly.AT&L can provide a compelling joint
approach as an answer to:Starting fast (inside the PPBE process).
Prevents breaking Service programs at the start of each
ACTD.Addresses the Valley of Death between successful demonstrated
capabilities & transition to acquisition/sustainment.GAO,
Congressional, DSB, and other studies which support the philosophy
of the JCTD initiative.
The time is right: JCTD fits the transformation and GWOT
initiatives of the Department Directly supports the SECDEFs goals
of shifting to a more rapid, joint capability process that will
increase CoCom influence.
*
ACTD/JCTD Back-up Slidesand QuestionsFinally, I will add that we
are encouraged by recent actions taken by DOD to initiate a joint
concept technology demonstration business process as it is intended
to meet joint and coalition forces needs and promotes many of the
good practices we outlined above. To be successful, this process
must have the authority and clout to overcome traditional barriers
and the tools necessary to drive a knowledge-based, evolutionary
acquisition approach. GAO Testimony before the HASC Subcommittee on
Tactical Air & Land Forces by Michael Sullivan, Acting
Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management (March 2005)
*
OverviewJoint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)(Four
parts to the 3-5 year initiative to transformthe ACTD program to
JCTD)Front-end incentive funds create fair-share partnership. First
two years of Service resources fenced in OSD. (JCTD PE will
eventually replace ACTD PE) Incentive to participate without
breaking Service core programs. Also provides stability of funding.
The Best JCTDs win the resources. Creation of new JCTD specific
Program Elements (Defense Wide and Service) (New D/W JCTD PEs have
been created RDT&E BA-3/4/5) Visibility and Accountability of
funds Allows time for Services to POM for outyears as JCTD proves
successful One year of Transition funding (New OSD JCTD PE in
RDT&E BA-4) Bridge the S&T capability Valley of Death DoD
prepared to catch successful capabilities without destructive
delays Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Pilot program Transition
Joint Peculiar systems into a fielded capability (New OSD PEs:
RDT&E BA-5, OSD Procurement). Lays the groundwork for USD
(AT&L) to pilot new acquisition models and look at ways to
address joint challenges identified in the Joint Capability Study
(Aldridge Study). Tracking joint capability through acquisition
into initial sustainmentResources were shifted from the ACTD
program to initiate the JCTD business model
Advanced Systems and Concepts
Quotes on Joint Needs
"The ability of the armed services the Army, the Navy, the Air
Force, the Marine Corps and the Coast Guard to work together is
increasing. It has to increase. Jointness has to become the rule
and not an occasional luxury.
Secretary of DefenseSpeech at the Association of the U.S. Army
Annual Meeting,Phoenix, Oct. 27, 2004
The rapidly changing international environment and the global
war on terrorism require that we create joint capabilities more
quickly.
General Myers, CJCS(Joint Force Quarterly: Summer
2002)UNCLASSIFIEDADM Fargo (USPACOM)
Im writing in support of the AT&L JCTD initiative, which
evolves the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration Program and
intends to stabilize start-up and transition funding for rapid
development of Joint capabilities.We need a stable program that
rapidly provides new Joint capabilities for demonstration,
assessment, and operational use. The ACTD program has served us
well. The JCTD initiative to stabilize funding and aid transition
of new Joint capabilities, with minimal impact on Service programs,
is the right thing to do.