ADDENDUM #1 1/6/2020 PROJECT: Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Southern Piedmont AREC BLD 890 IFB# 0060095 Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 TO ALL BIDDERS: GENERAL: Addenda are part of the Contract Documents and are issued to amend or interpret the Drawings and Specifications. The Addenda shall be acknowledged in the Bid Form – Division 0 – Section 00300 – in the space provided for addenda acknowledgement. CHANGES AND CLARIFICATIONS – GENERAL: - See revised “Bid Form” with template information removed. This revised bid form has also been incorporated into the “Project Manual”. - See “Pre-Bid Meeting Agenda” from meeting held on Monday, December 16 th , 2019 with substantial and final completion dates identified. - See “Lead & Asbestos Survey Report”. This was not issued with the original bid documents. - See below for definitions/descriptions for all bid deductive items: o Bid deduct #1 (Kitchen Area) – Remove ALL scope of work associated with Kitchen Prep RM 33 & Kitchen Demonstration RM 34. This includes but is not limited to all demolition, plumbing, electrical, casework, above ceiling, etc. o Bid deduct #2 (Break Room) – Remove ALL scope of work associated with Break Room 12. This includes but is not limited to all demolition, plumbing, electrical, casework, above ceiling, etc. *Base bid shall include all bid deducts, and bid deductive items may be accepted and removed from the scope of work at the discretion of the owner upon closing of the bid. All other terms, conditions and descriptions remain the same. The bid closing date remains Tuesday, January 14 th , 2020 at 2:00 PM; The bid opening date remains Wednesday, January 15 th , 2020 at 2:00 PM. This addendum will be posted on the VT procurement website at www.procurement.vt.edu. END OF ADDENDUM #1
48
Embed
ADDENDUM #1 Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ADDENDUM #1
1/6/2020
PROJECT: Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
Southern Piedmont AREC BLD 890
IFB# 0060095
Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
TO ALL BIDDERS:
GENERAL: Addenda are part of the Contract Documents and are issued to amend or
interpret the Drawings and Specifications. The Addenda shall be acknowledged in the
Bid Form – Division 0 – Section 00300 – in the space provided for addenda acknowledgement.
CHANGES AND CLARIFICATIONS – GENERAL:
- See revised “Bid Form” with template information removed. This revised bid form has also been
incorporated into the “Project Manual”.
- See “Pre-Bid Meeting Agenda” from meeting held on Monday, December 16th, 2019 with substantial
and final completion dates identified.
- See “Lead & Asbestos Survey Report”. This was not issued with the original bid documents.
- See below for definitions/descriptions for all bid deductive items:
o Bid deduct #1 (Kitchen Area) – Remove ALL scope of work associated with Kitchen Prep
RM 33 & Kitchen Demonstration RM 34. This includes but is not limited to all demolition,
plumbing, electrical, casework, above ceiling, etc.
o Bid deduct #2 (Break Room) – Remove ALL scope of work associated with Break Room
12. This includes but is not limited to all demolition, plumbing, electrical, casework, above
ceiling, etc.
*Base bid shall include all bid deducts, and bid deductive items may be accepted and removed
from the scope of work at the discretion of the owner upon closing of the bid.
All other terms, conditions and descriptions remain the same. The bid closing date remains Tuesday,
January 14th, 2020 at 2:00 PM; The bid opening date remains Wednesday, January 15th, 2020 at 2:00
PM. This addendum will be posted on the VT procurement website at www.procurement.vt.edu.
END OF ADDENDUM #1
Standard Bid Form Format Page 1 of 3
DGS-30-220 Standard Bid Form Format (Rev. 04/15)
BID FORM
DATE:
PROJECT: VT SP AREC Building 890 Restrooms
Project Code: IFB 0060095
To: Commonwealth of Virginia
____________________
__________________________
__________________________
In compliance with and subject to your Invitation for Bids and the documents therein specified, all of
which are incorporated herein by reference, the undersigned bidder proposes to furnish all labor,
equipment, and materials and perform all work necessary for construction of this project, in accordance
with the Plans and Specifications dated 10/21/2019, scope of work dated 12/9/2019, and all Addenda
noted below, as prepared by Virginia Tech Renovations for the consideration of the following amount:
BASE BID (including the following work in Deductive Bid Items):
Lump sum price to provide all labor, equipment, material and supervision required to perform
work in accordance with the bid documents for the Virginia Tech Southern Piedmont AREC
Contractor’s Proposed Small Business Participation: % _______
(required)
SP AREC Restrooms – Pre-bid Meeting Notes
December 16th, 2019
WO#: G1232-18-301179
Project Name: SP AREC Restroom Repairs
Project Manager: Curtis Williams
Pre-bid Meeting Notes – IFB# 0060095 For the Southern Piedmont AREC Restrooms renovation, Pre-bid Meeting held on Monday,
December 16th, 2019 at 9:30 AM.
1. Procurement
a. Sealed bids will be received at the Procurement Department, North End Center
(0333), Suite 2100, 300 Turner Street NW, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061. The
deadline for submitting bids is 2:00 P.M. sharp, as determined by the Bid Officer,
on Tuesday, January 14th, 2020. The bids will be opened publicly and read aloud
beginning at 2:00 P.M. on Wednesday, January 15th, 2020, at the same location.
b. Do not rely on USPS for mailing bids in. Hand delivering bids is the safest
option. Bids arriving late due to issue with mailing will not be accepted.
c. All Bidders are welcome to attend bid opening at 2:00 P.M on Thursday, May
23rd, 2019.
2. Overview of Project
a. Scope of Work/Permit Set
i. Construct (1) new standalone restroom and renovate (2) existing restrooms
with the Admin building (890). Discuss Phasing and facility schedule.
ii. Abatement/selective demolition shall be performed by owner. Overview
drawing modification regarding asbestos.
iii. New fixtures, flooring, partitions, ACT, GRD’s, light fixtures, etc.
iv. Bid additives have been requested for Break Room & Kitchen Areas. See
Scope of Work for details.
v. General contractor shall contract vendor to furnish and maintain a 24’
minimum portable restroom trailer. Porta-potys will not be acceptable.
Trailer will require electrical and plumbing hook-ups.
1. Recommended vendor – Edmunds Waste Removal
vi. Pre-Bid RFI’s shall be due Tuesday, December 24th no later than 5PM.
VTR shall issue addendum with RFI responses, and revised bid form by
January 3rd.
SP AREC Restrooms – Pre-bid Meeting Notes
December 16th, 2019
b. Drawings
i. Permitted Drawings will be sent digitally to the winning general contractor.
The University Building Official is experimenting with digital permit
drawings, and has provided a digital set with UBO approval stamp.
Contractor shall include allowance within bid for printing stamped drawings
to remain on-site at all time for inspections.
c. Scope of Work and Special Condition
i. Contractor should become familiar with the scope of work and special
conditions. The contractor may visit the project site prior to the bid due
date; contact the VT Project Manager prior to your site visit for approved
day/time.
3. Safety
a. Proper PPE – Hard Hats, hard soled boots, safety glasses
This PPE will be required as a minimum requirement on the project. In addition,
contractors must abide by the Virginia Tech Safety Requirements for Contractors
and Subcontractors dated March 2013. A link to this document has been
included below.
Any work to be done with an open flame will need a hot work permit. Virginia Tech will not issue hot work permits. The contractor is responsible for providing their own hot work program to the Virginia Tech Renovations and EHS representative prior to commencing work.
b. EHS Safety Standards on VT Website
Visit the link provided for EHS standards of construction on the VT campus
VT SOUTHERN PIEDMONT AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH EXTENSIONCENTER
2375 DARVILLS ROADBLACKSTONE, VIRGINIA 23824
ECS PROJECT NO. 47:6572
FOR: GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY
AUGUST 10, 2018
August 10, 2018
Mr. Curtis WilliamsGilbane Building Company330 Sterrett Facilities ComplexSuite 201Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
ECS Project No. 47:6572
Reference: VT SP AREC Asbestos & Lead Based Paint Survey, VT Southern Piedmont AgriculturalResearch Extension Center, 2375 Darvills Road, Blackstone, Virginia
Dear Mr. Williams:
ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC (ECS) is pleased to provide Gilbane Building Company with the results ofthe above referenced asbestos and lead based paint (LBP) survey report performed at the VTSouthern Piedmont Agricultural Research Extension Center located at 2375 Darvills Roadin Blackstone, Virginia. This report summarizes our observations, analytical results, findings, andrecommendations related to the work performed. The work described in this report was performedby ECS in general accordance with the Scope of Services described in ECS ProposalNumber 47:8545-EP and the terms and conditions of the agreement authorizing those services.
ECS appreciates this opportunity to provide Gilbane Building Company with our services. If we can beof further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC
Matt Dalton Christopher J. Chapman, CIHEnvironmental Staff Project Manager Director of Industrial [email protected][email protected] 8043536333
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The subject property is located at 2375 Darvills Road in Blackstone, Virginia. Limited renovationsare planned for areas located in Building 890 and the Pack House at Virginia Tech's SouthernPiedmont Agricultural Research and Extension Center. Based on contract drawings created by Burnsand McDonnell (Project Number 106737, dated February 20, 2017), plumbing and/or electric heaterrenovations are scheduled to occur in Rooms 12, 27, 28, 33, and 34 of Building 890, and Rooms 1 and2 of the Pack House.
The purpose of the survey was to determine if asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and LBPs arepresent within portions of the buildings to be renovated. The survey was performed in Rooms 12, 27,28, 33, and 34 of Building 890, and Rooms 1 and 2 of the Pack House (only).
Based on the laboratory analysis of the bulk samples collected during the survey, the followingmaterials were reported to contain asbestos:
• Floor Tiles and associated Mastics• Drywall Joint Compound• Sink Mastics• Tan HVAC Duct Insulation and Fiberglass Pipe Insulation Mastic
The lead-based paint survey was performed by a Commonwealth of Virginia licensed Lead Inspector.Painted and/or glazed surfaces were assessed for lead content using a Direct-Read X-RayFluorescence (XRF) Spectrometer. Lead-Based Glaze was identified on the following buildingmaterials/components:
• Ceramic Wall Tiles• Ceramic Sinks
The executive summary is an integral portion of this report, however, ECS recommends the report beread in it's entirety.
The subject property is improved with Virginia Tech's Southern Piedmont Agricultural Research andExtension Center, located at 2375 Darvills Road in Blackstone, Virginia. Plumbing and/or electricheater renovations are scheduled to occur in Rooms 12, 27, 28, 33, and 34 of Building 890, and Rooms1 and 2 of the Pack House.
2.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this survey was to identify ACMs and LBPs which may require special handling and/or disposal if removed during construction activities. The identification of ACMs may require trainedlabor, regulated work practices, and special disposal. The identification of LBP may require disclosureto contractors and monitoring of lead exposure.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
ECS performed the authorized Scope of Services in general accordance with our proposal, standardindustry practice(s) and methods specified by regulation(s) for the identification ofAsbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) and Lead-Based Paints (LBPs).
3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
The non-destructive/non-invasive asbestos survey was performed by asbestos inspectors who havereceived EPA accredited training licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Samples of suspectACMs were collected utilizing hand tools and placed into individual, labeled plastic bags. Uniquebulk suspect ACM samples were submitted to Environmental Hazards Services, LLCin Richmond, Virginia for analysis via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with currentEPA-600 methodology. Materials consisting of additional layers were analyzed separately.Environmental Hazards Services, LLC is listed as an accredited laboratory by the National VoluntaryLaboratory Accreditation Plan (NVLAP) managed by the National Institute of Standards andTechnology (NIST) for bulk sample analysis by currently approved EPA methodology by PLM.
During the survey, ECS attempted to identify suspect ACMs in readily accessible areas. However,due to the destructive means required to identify some materials, certain areas were deemedinaccessible (i.e. behind walls or sub grade materials) and were not surveyed for suspect ACMs. Onlythe rooms listed for renovation (within each building) were surveyed. No other areas of the buildings(interior or exterior) were surveyed. Unidentified suspect ACMs may be located in these and/or otherinaccessible areas.
Samples were collected in general accordance with EPA Standard 40 CFR 763 Subpart E, AsbestosHazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 Inspection Protocol.Multiple samples of each unique material were submitted. Samples were analyzed using “PositiveStop” methodology. If one sample of a homogeneous material is reported to contain asbestos, theremaining samples of that material are not analyzed. EPA regulations stipulate that if one samplecontains asbestos the entire quantity of that material contains asbestos, regardless of additionalanalysis.
ECS Project # 47:6572Page 1
3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
The Lead-Based Paint (LBP) survey was performed by a Virginia licensed Lead Inspector using a X-RayFluorescence (XRF) Spectrometer to identify lead concentrations in painted and glazed surfaces.
The survey was conducted utilizing the U.S. EPA definition of LBP. Under this definition, paintedsurfaces which contain lead in concentrations equal to or greater than 1.0 milligrams per squarecentimeter (≥ 1.0 mg/cm2) are classified as coated with LBP. Paints with concentrations of leaddetectable by the XRF are considered lead-containing paints. Additionally, fixtures or componentsthat are manufactured with a factory applied glazing (i.e., sinks, toilets, ceramic tiles, etc.) are testedas these factory-applied finishes often contain lead. Activities which disturb lead-containing paintsand glazing (while not lead-based paints by the U.S. EPA definition) are regulated by OSHA (29 CFR1926.62).
Because the current or proposed use of the property is not residential or child-occupied, the scopeof the LBP survey was not conducted in accordance with HUD Chapter 7 requirements. Thisrepresentative survey included taking readings from walls, windows, doors, and miscellaneouscomponents. Walls are listed by letter with wall “A” being the entrance of the subject building,proceeding clockwise to “B, C, D”, etc.
4.0 RESULTS
The following is a summary of laboratory results, findings and observations.
4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
In total, 54 bulk samples from 19 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory of which 69layers were analyzed.
An Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) is defined as any material containing more than one percent(>1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR Part 763,Section 1, PLM. Materials are categorized by the U.S. EPA in the following categories:
• Friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reducedto powder by hand pressure. Non-friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry,cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
• Category I non-friable ACM are listed as following: packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings,and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.
• Category II non-friable ACM are listed as any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM,containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.
Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) are friable ACM or non-friable ACM that will be orhas been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading or has crumbled, been pulverized, orreduced to powder in the course of renovation and/or demolition operations. A complete list of thesampled materials submitted for analysis is located in the Appendix.
Environmental Hazards Services, LLC submitted a signed final laboratory report to ECS on July31, 2018. The asbestos containing materials are summarized below. A complete list of the sampled
ECS Project # 47:6572Page 2
materials submitted for analysis and sample locations are located in the Appendix of this report.Additional details regarding the overall locations of the materials identified as asbestos-containingare provided further in the report.
Summary of Asbestos-Containing Materials Identified
Drywall/Joint Compound (2% Chrysotile). This material is classified under US EPA NESHAPregulations as a regulated friable ACM. All similar materials found throughout both buildings should
ECS Project # 47:6572Page 3
be assumed to contain asbestos. Prior to disturbance, it is recommended that this material be abatedby a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. This material was observed in both buildings, includingthe break room and kitchen of Building 890, as well as in the men's and women's bathrooms and theoffice in the Packhouse.
With regards to drywall joint compound, several options exist with regards to abatement of thismaterial. EPA allows for further sampling and analysis of the materials in order to composite thesample and determine if greater than 1 % asbestos is present. If less than 1% is present, the materialis no longer regulated under US EPA regulations. However OSHA generally does not allow for thisoption and consider removal of joint compound a Class II abatement activity. The Owner may wishto further review with ECS appropriate options in order to best address abatement of this material.At this time Virginia Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) has recommended point countingany positive asbestos joint compound samples (August 2015 - personal communication – Mr. DougWiggins Senior Compliance Officer DLI).
Non-Friable Asbestos Containing Materials:
Floor Tile and Mastic (2-6% Chrysotile). These materials are classified under US EPA NESHAPregulations as Category I non-friable ACMs. All similar materials found within both buildings shouldbe assumed to contain asbestos. Prior to disturbance, it is recommended that these materialsbe abated by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. These materials were observed in bothbuildings, including the break room in Building 890, and the men's bathroom in the Packhouse.
Sink Mastic (3-5% Chrysotile). This material is classified under US EPA NESHAP regulations as aCategory II non-friable ACM. All similar materials found within building B-890 should be assumed tobe asbestos containing. Prior to disturbance, it is recommended that this material be abated by alicensed asbestos abatement contractor. This material was observed on the sinks in the kitchen andbreakroom.
Thermal System Insulation Mastic (4% Chrysotile). This material is classified under US EPANESHAP regulations as a Category II non-friable ACM. All similar materials found within buildingB-890 should be assumed to be asbestos containing. This material may be present behind solid wallsor above solid ceilings. Prior to disturbance, it is recommended that this material be abated by alicensed asbestos abatement contractor. This material was observed on piping (mastics on joints) inthe kitchen.
4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials
Due to the inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, additionalsuspect ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas that include, butare not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooringlocated below underlayments, areas behind solid walls or above solid ceilings, pipe trenches, andsubsurface utilities, etc. These areas were deemed inaccessible and were not assessed.
If these materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to containasbestos and be treated as ACMs or be sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbancefor asbestos content by a certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.
ECS Project # 47:6572Page 4
Based upon our past experience in the identification of ACMs in similarly constructed buildings, thefollowing additional suspect ACMs may also be located in inaccessible areas of the structure:
• All areas (interior and exterior) of the buildings not covered by this survey• Exterior wall and subslab water proofing and vapor barriers• Fire doors
4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
Paint and surface coatings which contain detectable concentrations of lead considered“lead-containing paints”. Since OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the sitefound to have a measurable concentration of lead should be assumed to be lead containing. Workperformed which may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA as referenced under 29CFR 1926.62. A total of 51 readings were collected during the survey, including calibration readings.Paint, glazing and other surface coatings in which lead was detected above the US EPA action levelare summarized in the table below.
Summary of XRF Lead-Based Paint Results
Location Color Substrate Component
Women's Room (B-890) Blue Ceramic Wall Tile
Men's Room (B-890) Blue Ceramic Wall Tile
Men's Room (B-890) White Ceramic Sink
Men's Room (Packhouse) White Ceramic Sink
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Based on our understanding of the purpose of the VT SP AREC Asbestos & Lead Based Paint Survey,the results of laboratory analysis, and our findings and observations, ECS presents the followingrecommendations.
5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
ECS recommends where a material type has been identified as asbestos containing that all othermaterials with similar color, texture, age and size throughout the building’s interior and exterior beassumed to contain asbestos. Please refer to Section 4.1 for a complete list of building materials thatwere reported positive for asbestos and to Section 4.2 for materials that were assumed to containasbestos.
If these materials are to be disturbed by planned renovations, ECS recommends they be removedbeforehand by a Virginia accrediated asbestos abatement contractor.
ECS Project # 47:6572Page 5
Due to large amount of ACMs identified, ECS recommends that a project specification be preparedto delineate and quantify known and suspect hazardous and regulated materials in the buildings andto outline proper procedures for the abatement. This will help protect the owner’s liability in betterdefining the scope of work and contractors’ roles and responsibilities in the abatement process andholding the contractor accountable for the performance of the project. The specification typicallydefines the Contractor’s scope of work and outline requirements and procedures that must befollowed for the project. The intent of the specification is to give performance requirements for theContractor so that the project can be completed safely and in compliance with applicable federal andstate regulations. Typically, the specification document serves as part of the site owner’s contract withthe contractor.
If ACMs are to be removed, it is recommended that an industrial hygienist monitor the project.This involves collecting air samples from within and outside abatement work areas to monitorthe asbestos abatement contractor’s work practices over the course of the project. The industrialhygienist should evaluate if the asbestos abatement work is in accordance with project specifications,U.S. EPA regulation 40 CFR Part 61-National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants SubpartM: National Emission Standard for Asbestos, and U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1926.1101 – Asbestos in Construction. The industrial hygienist shouldassess each work area to monitor the removal of ACMs. Only after the industrial hygienist hasdetermined the identified ACMs have been removed should final clearance air samples be collected(if necessary).
Suspect ACMs not observed due to inaccessibility or not sampled due to the destructive meansthat sampling would require may also be encountered during construction activities. At the time ofthe survey, only limited destructive means were used to locate or sample suspect ACMs; therefore,additional suspect ACMs may remain within inaccessible areas that include, but are not limitedto, [sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, exterior areas, sub-grade sealants, flooringlocated below underlayments, vapor barriers, pipe trenches and other subsurface utilities, etc.]If additional suspect ACMs are uncovered which were not accessible during this survey, it isrecommended that these materials either be assumed to contain asbestos or be sampled prior todisturbance upon discovery for asbestos content by an asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR1926.1101.
Should any identified ACM remain in place, ECS recommends the development and implementationof a site-specific Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Plan detailing routine maintenance andrepair operations, contractor notification procedures, and all other requirements under OSHA –reference 29 CFR 1926.1101.
5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
Based on the findings of this report, detectable concentrations of lead were identified on glazings onwall tiles found in the bathrooms of Building B-890 and the ceramic sinks in the bathrooms of bothbuildings.
The presence of lead is a concern primarily when conditions exist where it may inhaled or ingested.Regardless of the analytical results of a material, all painted and/or glazed surfaces may still containconcentrations of lead in the paint, which when disturbed, may generate lead dust greater than
ECS Project # 47:6572Page 6
the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic millimeter (ug/m3) as an 8-hourTime Weighted Average (TWA) established by the OSHA “Lead Exposure in Construction Rule (29 CFR1926.62).”
The OSHA standard gives no guidance on acceptable levels of lead in paint at which no exposureto airborne lead (above the action level) would be expected. Rather, OSHA defines airborneconcentrations, and references specific types of work practices and operations from which a leadhazard may be generated (reference 29 CFR 1926.62, section d). Environmental and personnelmonitoring should be conducted during any removal/demolition process (as appropriate) to verifythat actual personal exposures are below the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 microgramsper cubic millimeter (µg/m3) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA). Under OSHA requirements,the contractor performing renovation work will be required to conduct this monitoring and followapplicable requirements under 29 CFR 1926.62 if disturbing lead-containing paint.
6.0 LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations presented within this report are based upon a reasonablelevel of assessment within normal bounds and standards of professional practice for a site in thisparticular geographic setting. ECS is not responsible or liable for the discovery and elimination ofhazards that may potentially cause damage, accidents, or injuries.
The observations, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to environmental conditions at thesubject site are necessarily limited to conditions observed, and/or materials reviewed at the time thisstudy was undertaken. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made with regard to the conclusionsand recommendations presented within this report. This report is provided for the exclusive use ofthe client. This report is not intended to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects orby other unidentified third parties without the written consent of ECS and the client.
Our recommendations are in part based on federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines. ECSdoes not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the site, or otherwise undertakeresponsibility for reporting to any local, state, or federal public agencies, any conditions at the sitethat may present a potential danger to public health, safety, or the environment. Under this scope ofservices, ECS assumes no responsibility regarding any response actions initiated as a result of thesefindings. General compliance with regulations and response actions are the sole responsibility of theClient and should be conducted in accordance with local, state, and/or federal requirements.