TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Executive Summary 5 List of Tables 1- Local Government Areas surveyed in the 21 senatorial districts 2- Age distribution of the respondents 25 3- Educational attainment of households’ income 26 Earners 4- Major sources of water available to the 27 households in the communities 5- Ownership of house by the respondents 27 6- Toilet facilities in households 28 7- Primary occupation of the respondents 29 8- Monthly income from primary and secondary 30 Occupation 9- Methods of waste disposal by households 32 10- Membership of community organizations 33 11a- Distribution of respondents according to 35 whether differences in education, wealth, landholding, social status and religious beliefs tend to divide people in surveyed communities 11b- Distribution of respondents according to 35 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PagesExecutive Summary 5 List of Tables 1- Local Government Areas surveyed in the 21 senatorial districts 2- Age distribution of the respondents 253- Educational attainment of households’ income 26 Earners4- Major sources of water available to the 27 households in the communities 5- Ownership of house by the respondents 27 6- Toilet facilities in households 28 7- Primary occupation of the respondents 29 8- Monthly income from primary and secondary 30 Occupation 9- Methods of waste disposal by households 32 10- Membership of community organizations 3311a- Distribution of respondents according to 35 whether differences in education, wealth, landholding, social status and religious beliefs tend to divide people in surveyed communities 11b- Distribution of respondents according to 35 whether differences in political parties, ethnic background, gender and age tend to divide people in surveyed communities 12- Community ways of handling differences 36 13- Participation of respondents in previous 37 collective actions with respect to community development 14- Success of previous collective actions with 38 respect to community development 15- Distribution of respondents according to their 38 responses to participation in their communities 16- Distribution of respondents according to their 38 responses on whether or not they contribute time and money towards common developmental goals 17- Services where respondents are occasionally 39 Denied 18- Reasons why some people are excluded from 39 Services 19- Distribution of respondents on whether they 40 have done the following activities in the last three years 20- Distribution of respondents on whether they 41
1
were approached to do the following activities in the last three years
SECTION ONE BACKGROUND INFORMATION1.1 The Community and Social Development Project 111.2 Terms of Reference 121.2.1 Objectives of the Baseline Survey 131.2.2 Scope of the work 14SECTION TWO SURVEY METHODOLOGY2.1 Study Area 192.2 Survey Instruments 192.3 Sample Design and Sampling Procedure 192.4 Training of Enumerators 232.5 Data Collection Process 232.6 Supervision and Quality Control 242.7 Method of Data Analysis 24SECTION THREE RESULTS AND DISCUSSION3.1 Socioeconomic status of the respondents 253.2 Sanitation and waste management system in the 31
Communities3.3 Membership of Community Based institutions 323.4 Social Exclusion 333.5 Community members methods of handling differences 363.6 Collective Action by community members 363.7 Participation of the respondents in civic duties 39SECTION FOUR DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIOECONOMIC
CHARACTERISTICS OF SAMPLED COMMUNITIES4.1 NORTHERN SENATORIAL DISTRICT4.1.1 Madagali Local Government Area 424.1.1.1 Bebel Community 424.1.1.2 Dar Community 454.1.1.3 Dzuel community 484.1.1.4 Gubla Community 514.1.1.5 Humshi (Vizik) community 534.1.1.6 Mayo Wandu 554.1.1.7. Kirchinga Community 574.1.1.8 Vapura (Mildow) Community 604.1.1.9. Wuroganyandi Kuda Community 624.1.1.10. Zhau Community 644.1.2. MUBI NORTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT 664.1.2.1. Bagira Community 664.1.2.2. Bahuli Community 684.1.2.3. Betso Community 704.1.2.4. Kiriya Community 734.1.2.5. Lira Community 754.1.2.6. Mijilu Community 774.1.2.7 Muchalla Community 794.1.2.8. Muva Community 81
2
4.1.2.9. Muvur Community 834.1.2.10. Ribawa Community 854.1.3 MUBI SOUTH LOCAL GOVERNMENT 864.1.3.1. Dribish Community 864.1.3.2. Duvu Community 894.1.3.3. Gella Community 914.1.3.4. Gude Community 934.1.3.5. Lamurde Community 95 4.1.3.6. Mijara Community 974.1.3.7. Mugulvu Community 1004.1.3.8. Nduku Community 1024.1.3.9. Suburum Community 1054.1.3.10. Sahuda Community 1084.2 SOUTHERN SENATORIAL DISTRICT 1114.2.1 Mayo-Belwa Local Government 1114.2.1.1. Binkola Community 1114.2.1.2. Nassarawo Jereng Community 1134.2.1.3. Sebore Community 1154.2.1.4. Mayo-Farang Community 1174.2.1.5. Sangere Community 1194.2.1.6. Ndiyamjimtobe Community 1214.2.1.7. Yolde Gubudo Community 1234.2.1.8. Chukkol Community 1254.2.1.9 Sindigawo Community 1274.2.1.10. Kaurami Community 1294.2.2 GUYUK LOCAL GOVERNMENT 1314.2.2.1. Walu Community 1314.2.2.2. Bodeno Community 1334.2.2.3. Lokoro Community 1354.2.2.4. Chikila Community 1374.2.2.5. Boshikiri Community 1394.2.2.6. Tudun Guyuk Community 1414.2.2.7 Lakumna Community 1434.2.2.8. Bobini Community 1454.2.2.9 Gugu Community 1474.2.2.10. Pondiwe Community 1494.2.3. DEMSA LOCAL GOVERNMENT
4.2.3.1. Farai Community 1514.2.3.2 Dwam Sakato Community 153 4.2.3.3 Bille Community 1554.2.3.4. Bolon Community 1574.2.3.5. Gejembo Community 1594.2.3.6 Dong Community 1614.2.3.7. Dem Community 1634.2.3.8. Bwashi Community 1654.2.3.9. Old Demsa Community 167
3
4.2.3.10. Farabuane Community 1694.3. CENTRAL SENATORIAL DISTRICT4.3.1. GIREI LOCAL GOVERNMENT4.3.1.1. Daneyel Community 1714.3.1.2. Kangling Community 173 4.3.1.3. Dakri Bobbo Community 1754.3.1.4 . Koh Community 1774.3.1.5. Njerenga Community 1794.3.1.6. Jerra Boyo Community 1814.3.1.7. Laide Danfulani Community 183 4.3.1.8. Dakri Alhaji Bakari Community 1854.3.1.9 Bajabure Community 1874.3.1.10 Karewa Community 1894.3.2. GOMBI LOCAL GOVERNMENT4.3.2.1. Gadamaisaje Community 1914.3.2.2. Parijo Community 1934.3.2.3. Mijuwana Community 195 4.3.2.4. Bebe Community 1974.3.2.5. Gudumiya Community 1994.3.2.6. Jau Community 2014.3.2.7. Sabon Gari Community 203 4.3.2.8 Korwa B Community 2054.3.2.9. Kaulewa Community 2074.3.2.10. Barda Community 209 4.3.3. FUFORE LOCAL GOVERNMENT4.3.3.1. Belichiuti Community 2114.3.3.2. Wuro Sham Community 2134.3.3.3. Wuro Ardo Community 2154.3.3.4. Wuro Mallum Community 2174.3.3.5. Dulo Bwatiye Community 2194.3.3.6. Muninga Community 2214.3.3.7. Mayo Sirkan Community 223 4.3.3.8. Wuro Yolde Community 2254.3.3.9. Bengo Community 2274.3.3.10. Wailare Community 229
SECTION FIVEHighlights of Major Findings 231Conclusion 232Recommendations 232 Appendix I 233Appendix II 234
4
E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y
Background
Community and Social Development Project (CSDP) is a scaled up of the pilot Community-
based Poverty Reduction Project (CPRP) and Local Empowerment and Environmental
Management Project (LEEMP). CSDP is therefore an intervention building on the CPRP and
LEEMP structures to effectively target socioeconomic and water resources management
infrastructural projects at the community level as well as improve Local Government Area
(LGA) responsibility to service delivery. The overall goal of the CSDP is to improve access
to services for human development. To enable proper documentation of the project impact,
there is need for baseline study. The baseline study results will serve as an initial measure to
assess the effect of CSDP interventions in Adamawa State. To this end, a Baseline Survey
was done to ascertain the present state of socio-economic development of participating
communities to ensure that at the end of the project, proper and acceptable impact assessment
studies could be carried-out in the state.
Objectives of the Baseline Survey
The broad objective of the survey is to collect and collate baseline information on sampled
communities in Nine (9) of the twenty-one (21) LGAs to be considered in the first instance.
This baseline is to assist in providing opportunities for intervention by the project and also to
provide a basis for impact based comparison of pre and post project situation in the CSDP
communities. The specific objectives of the proposed survey are to establish a baseline for
the socio-economic situation and existence or non-existence of basic infrastructural facilities
across sector. The sectors are education, health, water, transport, rural electrification,
socioeconomic, natural resources/environment and vulnerability/gender.
Scope of work
To achieve the objective of the proposed baseline survey, it would be necessary to obtain all
the relevant details of persons living in project affected area relating to families, resource
use/dependence and infrastructure of the area as specified in the TOR approved by the World
Bank.
5
Methodology
Study area and method of data collection
The baseline survey was conducted in ninety (90) selected communities from nine LGAs.
The LGAs are Madagali, Mubi North and Mubi South in the North Senatorial District;
Gombi, Girei and Fufore in theCentral Senatorial District; and Demsa, Guyuk and Mayo
Belwa in the South Senatorial District. Two methods of data collection were adopted. These
were focus group discussion (FGD) and cross-sectional survey (CSS). The FGD was used to
obtain village level information while the CSS was used to obtain information from randomly
selected individuals from the communities. In addition, secondary information was obtained
from the LGA office on the existence of schools, water sources and health facilities.
Information were obtained by means of oral interviews and by the use of well structured
questionnaires.
Socioeconomic characteristics of respondents
Age distribution of respondents
The age category ranges from 10 to over 60 years. The sample of respondents was designed
to capture a wide profile of the people in the communities (the young and the old inclusive).
Educational attainment of the households’ income earners and the Education Sector
The educational qualification of the household heads (as presented in Table 3) shows that
majority (about 34.11%) of the respondents attained the basic primary education. Those with
higher level of education were 42.55 percent of the sampled population. The universal policy
on education makes it compulsory for all to have basic education which runs from primary
one to junior secondary school. As shown in the table only 13.56 percent of the respondents
attained the junior secondary education.
In most of the communities sampled there are primary schools for pupils. Some of the
schools, however, are far from the communities and would require considerable time for
pupils to trek daily. There are also many incidences of high teacher to students ratio in the
schools an indication that most of the schools are understaffed. In many communities these
schools operate from dilapidated structures and occasionally pupils operate from buildings
without roof There are also absence of basic facilities such staff rooms, toilets, water supply,
desks and tables for the pupils and teachers. Instructional materials are in short supply and
6
school attendance in some of the remote communities fluctuates remarkably during the
cropping season when children are drafted to do farm chores. The environment of the schools
in many cases are not conducive for learning and teaching.
Occupation of respondents
Occupational prestige is one component of socioeconomic status that encompasses both
income and educational attainment. Occupational status reflects the level of educational
attainment of the respondents. The primary occupations of the respondents include farming,
civil service, petty trading and paid labour among others. Majority of the respondents are
independently employed in the private sector. The occupational distribution of the
respondents reveals that farming is the most important activity in most of the communities
surveyed. The implication of this is that there is need for increased investment in the
agricultural sector in order to ensure its sustainability, growth and development.
Income from primary and secondary occupations
The respondents were predominantly low income earners. In view of the fact that most of
them are farmers, their monthly income distribution shows that they are mainly subsistence
farmers who produce principally for family consumption. Low income families focus on
meeting immediate needs and do not accumulate wealth that could be passed to future
generations, thus increasing income inequality.
Health Sector
The primary health clinics are available in most of the communities; however, these clinics
are not stocked with drugs and other requisite facilities for health care delivery. Also, in some
of the communities there are dispensaries without drugs and the people have to travel long
distances to access health care. The PHC clinics do not have facilities for in-patients. The
PHCs are managed by paramedics.
It takes an appreciable time to get to where health care can be accessed in most of the
communities. In most cases the people have to travel to the local government headquarters to
Sanitation and waste management system in the communities
In most cases the people dispose waste into vacant plots, rivers/streams/drainage systems.
About 47.1 percent of the respondents dispose waste into vacant plots (empty, undeveloped
plots of land within their neighborhood). The second most common method of waste disposal
in the communities is by disposing solid waste into rivers/streams and drainages.
There are no incinerators in the communities for waste management and waste disposal
system is rudimentary. The people dispose wastes in a fashion that predisposes them to risk
of deadly epidemics.
Water Sector
The major sources of water available to the inhabitants of the sampled communities include
wells, boreholes and streams/rivers. The survey revealed that about 64 percent of the
households have wells as their major source of water for both drinking and domestic
purposes. There are however communities where people scoop water from ditches for
drinking and domestic purposes. People and livestock share same sources of water in many of
the communities. The quality of many of these water sources is suspect as revealed by the
water sample laboratory analysis.
Transport SectorThere are no feeder roads in many of the communities. Most of the roads are seasonal roads
and can only be used during the dry season. There are no bridges as foot paths wind through
river beds, valleys and troughs. Erosion from heavy storm has done devastating damage to
many feeder roads where a number of culverts are cut off; thus rendering the roads very
difficult for vehicular and human movement. People however ply the existing roads in the
course of carrying out daily economic activities.
Rural Electrification Sector
In most of the communities sampled there is no public source of power and households rely
on kerosene lantern. The rural electrification service is not functional in many of the
communities. Small businesses established in the communities include rice milling, grain,
grinding and artisans. Electronic gadgets are not common in most of the communities. People
employ services of generators to be able operate electronics where available.
8
Socio-Economic SectorThere are no multipurpose halls in most of the communities sampled but there are market
stalls. The market stalls are temporary structures which are made by posting sticks and
placing thatched roof over. Goods sold in these markets range from agricultural produce to
basic household items such as matches and firewood. There are no skill acquisition centers in
most of the sampled communities for the youth and unemployed. Social activities in the
communities however are very vibrant and this varies from one place to another.
Natural Resources/Environment SectorNo forest reserve or communal forest area was found in the surveyed community clusters
across the nine LGAs, however, illegal deforestation practice is actively going on in all the
LGAs surveyed. Trade in fire wood is fast becoming a booster to the economy of many
households of late. Forest trees and other economic trees are being destroyed at a rate much
faster than trees are planted to regenerate them.
There are no public toilets in the communities. Human waste liters the environment as people
are left with no choice than to freely use the bush and other empty plots of land in the
neighborhoods. There are erosion sites in all the LGAs surveyed. There are no drainages in
the communities.
Organization Density and characteristicsCommunity institutions (sometimes known as community-based organizations) are civil
society that are not profit oriented but operate within a single local community. They are
essentially a subset of the wider group of non-profit organizations that are often run as a
voluntary and self funding basis. There are many local level community- based organisations
across the state. These organisations range from socio-religious to occupational groups. Many
of the people living in these communities are members of these organisations. Their degree of
participation is very high as it is a form of social capital for the people.
Social ExclusionThere is not much of social exclusion. The people talked about harmonious relationship and mutual cooperation and participation in community development process.
Collective ActionCollective action is the pursuit of a goal or set of goals by more than one person.The people
cited instances in the past when they collectively participated in solving some challenges that
9
faced their communities. This they did through contribution in cash and materials towards
executing community projects. In all, about 68.11 percent of them have taken part in
community services in the past. This is an indication that the communities can be mobilized
for collective action. The awareness of the relevance of collective action to community
development is already widespread among the people. Decision making by the government
and donor agencies relative to development projects in communities are usually taken in most
cases without any input by the people for whom the projects were planned.
Vulnerability/Gender SectorThere are orphans, widows, physically challenged and other vulnerable children in all the
communities but there are however no orphanages. There are no orphans and vulnerable
children receiving books and other instructional materials as support either from government
or from development partners.
Conclusion and recommendationIn conclusion, it is evident that the sampled communities in the nine LGAs of Adamawa State
selected for the baseline survey are involved in both farming (crop and livestock) and non-
farming activities which constitute their main source of livelihood. More importantly, the
sampled communities are deficient in infrastructural facilities both in terms of available
numbers and adequacy of the existing ones. Similarly, continued exploitation of the fragile
natural resources and poor infrastructural facilities would further reduce agricultural
productivity and increase uncertainties and vulnerability of the rural dwellers to food
insecurity and extreme poverty.
Therefore, it is recommended that CSDP initiative is necessary by bringing sustainable
existing interventions that would address the priority issues in respect of general
infrastructural development and farming and non-farming interventions in all the
participating communities. Focus should be tailored in areas such as: (1) provision of
infrastructural facilities such as additional classroom blocks in schools, renovation of health
centers and supply of necessary facilities, skill acquisition centers, etc (2) empowerment of
the rural poor in all the participating communities to enhance their capacity to generate
income through small-scale activities, (3) strengthening of linkages between relevant
institutions within the participating communities most especially trade associations and
cooperative societies, and (4) full integration of women into the development process is an
important precondition for the sustainability and success of CSDP development efforts.
10
Chapter One
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.1 The Community and Social Development Project
Community and Social Development Project (CSDP) is a scale up of the pilot Community-
based Poverty Reduction Project (CPRP) and Local Empowerment and Environmental
Management Project (LEEMP). CSDP is therefore an intervention building on the CPRP and
LEEMP structures to effectively target socioeconomic and water resources management,
infrastructural projects at the community level as well as improve Local Government Area
(LGA) responsibility to service delivery. One of the key highlights of the CSDP is that clear-
cut supportive roles and responsibility provided by the key actors in the project cycle.
Community and Social Development Project (CSDP) is generally a new intervention that
would effectively target social and environmental infrastructure at the community level as
well as improve local government area (LGA) responsibility to service delivery. One of the
key highlight of the CSDP is that clear–cut supportive roles and responsibility provided by
the key actors in the project cycle. The overall goal of the CSDP is to improve access to
services for human development. In order to achieve this goal, the project development
objective (PDO) is to support empowerment of communities and LGAs for sustainable
increase access of poor people to improved social and natural resource infrastructure.
To enable proper documentation of the project impact, there is need for baseline study. The
baseline study results will serve as an initial measure to assess the impact of CSDP
interventions in Adamawa State. In addition, the baseline study will be a reference point for
the impact assessment that will document changes in key project indicators that occur as a
result of CSDP interventions. Data from the baseline study also fit directly into the
programmatic decision-making process so as to ensure that interventions target the specific
supply and demand needs of the local context. According to World Bank (2008) the objective
of the Community and Social Development Project for Nigeria is to sustainably increase
access of poor people to social and natural resource infrastructure services. There are three
components to the project.
11
The first component is the federal level- coordination and program support. At the federal
level, this component will be supervised by the federal ministry of finance, while the direct
responsibility for implementation will rest with the existing Federal Project Support Unit
(FPSU). The FPSU will be responsible for providing technical backstopping to state agencies
on procurement, financial management, gender, environment, and local government capacity
issues. The unit will organize the appropriate technical assistance based on requests from
state agencies or needs identified by the monitoring and evaluation system.
The second component is the Local Government Authority (LGA)/sectoral ministries
capacity and partnership building. This component will be implemented by the state agency
in all participating states and will provide funding for capacity building, skills training and
hardware types of investments. The objective of this component is to establish and strengthen
a partnership between LGA and communities.
Finally, the third component is the community-driven investment. State agencies will
manage this component. Funding will be provided for Community Development Plans
(CDPs) of selected communities, based on specific criteria, including broad based community
participation in plans formulation, micro-project identification and preparation, and a
matching contribution from communities.
The overall goal of the CSDP is to improve access to services for human development. To
achieve this goal, the Project Development Objective (PDO) is to support empowerment of
communities and LGAs for sustainable increase access of poor people to improved social and
natural resource infrastructure. To enable proper documentation of the project impact, there is
need for baseline study. The baseline study results will serve as an initial measure to assess
the effect of CSDP interventions in Adamawa State. In addition, the baseline study will be a
reference point for the impact assessment that will document changes in key project
indicators that occur as a result of CSDP interventions. Data from the baseline study also feed
directly into the programmatic decision-making process to ensure that interventions target the
specific supply and demand needs of the local context.
1.2 Terms of reference
The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Baseline Survey defined the objectives of the survey
as well as the scope of the work to be done. These are presented as follows.
12
1.2.1 Objectives of the Baseline Survey
The broad objective of the survey is to collect and collate baseline information on sampled
communities in Nine (9) of the twenty-one (21) LGAs to be considered in the first instance.
This baseline is to assist in providing opportunities for intervention by the project and also to
provide a basis for impact based comparison of pre and post project situation in the CSDP
communities. The specific objectives of the proposed survey are to:
1. Provide community level information such as name of LGA and communities,
distance of community to the LGA and State capital, population of community
disaggregated into gender/adult/children/ethnicity/religion, average household size
(family) disaggregated into gender/adult/children, socio-cultural features that
influence community economic development such as market days and frequency,
local festivals and historic events and existing village organizations such as CDAs etc.
2. Access aspects of socio-economic conditions of the project beneficiaries’ households across
sectors.
3. Describe the present status of infrastructural facilities in the selected communities.
4. Identify the vulnerable sections and individuals of the affected population.
5. Collect details of the persons living in project affected area in terms of their
demographic features like age, sex, educational status, occupation, degree of
dependence on local natural resources (that are likely to be affected by the project),
employment status (if self employed, then number of days of employment per year)
and their source of income.
6. Estimate the income consumption and indebtedness of the households.
7. Assess the ownership of land holding pattern and its use related particulars.
8. Estimate the households’ production from the land in the project vicinity.
9. Assess their dependence on local resources other than privately owned land like
forests, water resources, pasture land and other common property resources.
10. Assess the extent of possession of immovable assets like houses, trees, agricultural
land and commercial assets etc.
11. Assess the employment potentials of the area with the help of educational status, skill
levels, unemployed personnel (with education level and skill levels) available for
work.
13
1.2.2 Scope of the Work
To achieve the objectives of the baseline survey the research team visited the nine (9) LGAs
and obtained the following general information in respect of all the LGAs and communities.
1. Name of the LGA and communities;
2. Distance of the community to the LGA headquarters and state capital;
3. Population of community disaggregated into ender/adult/children/ethnicity/religion
4. Natural resources features such as land, water and forests;
5. Occupation (cropping pattern, crops, yields, domestic animals such as sheep, goats,
cattle and others)
6. Available infrastructure (schools, health centres and their status, water supply etc);
7. Average household size (family) disaggregated into gender/adult/children;
8. Average household income distribution
9. Sources of household income/economic activities;
10. Socio cultural features that influence community economic development such as
market days and frequency, local festivals and historic events;
11. Existing village organizations such as CDAs, CBOs etc.
The following specific information were also provided:
i. Economic environment of the communities in the LGAs. This included the economic
activities, the social and cultural factors that influence economic development and
sharing of common property resources, sources of livelihood of families and their
income per capita. Specific attention was placed on gender and vulnerable groups
(men, women, youth, and disabled, minorities etc)
ii. Water quality and changes in parameter within the LGA. Water and soil samples were
collected from different sources such as streams, wells, boreholes etc and tested both
at the field and at the laboratory.
iii. Structure of formal and informal institutions and their current roles in community
development activities.
iv. Agricultural production systems, cropping patterns, yields, households income and
constraints to agricultural productivity
v. Identify and assess status of resources (land, forests, water etc) within the LGAs and
identify indicators that could be used to monitor changes
14
vi. Availability and quality/condition of infrastructural facilities in all sectors such as
Table 4 shows the major sources of water available to the peoples. They include water sellers,
wells, boreholes, public taps and streams/rivers. The table shows that about 64 percent of the
households have wells as their major source of water for both drinking and other domestic
purposes. This is the situation in all the rural communities that were surveyed. Well is also
very popular in some of the semi-urban settlements that were surveyed. The next most used
sources of water were boreholes and streams/rivers in that order. Public taps was not a very
26
popular source of water. Only about 1 percent of the households utilised the services of water
sellers regularly. This could be a reflection of the economic status of the households.
Table 4: Major sources of water available to the households in the communities.
Water source Frequency PercentageWater sellers 11 1.22Well 575 63.89Boreholes 134 14.89Public tap 59 6.56Streams/rivers 121 13.44Total 900 100.0Source: Baseline survey, 2010.
Ownership of house and structure of house
Table 5 shows the distribution of the respondents according to ownership of house. About
73.89 percent of the respondents live in their own family houses. The houses are mainly
constructed with mud and have thatched roofs. They are poorly ventilated in most cases since
they have very small windows. The floor of the houses are rarely cemented Also it can be
seen that about 23.67 percent live in owner occupier houses. Renting of accommodation is
not popular among the respondents across the communities. Rather than expend money on
paying rent the respondents would rather put such monies, where available, to some other
uses.
Table 5: Ownership of house by the respondents.
Type of ownership Frequency PercentageRented 24 2.67Family house 665 73.89Owner occupier house 213 23.67Others 6 0.67Total 900 100.0Source: Baseline survey, 2010.
Availability of toilet facilities in the houses
In Table 6 it can be seen that the toilet facilities used by the respondents included pit toilet,
water cistern and bucket type latrines. About 60.3 percent of the households use pit toilets
while about 4 percent use shallow pit toilets. The use of bush was the next popular way of
disposal of human waste in the communities that were surveyed with about 23.7 percent. This
27
has implication on the state of sanitation and personal hygiene in these communities. This
situation can pose a veritable source of risk to the health and wellbeing of the people.
Table 6: Toilet facilities in households
Type of facility Frequency PercentageWater cistern 14 1.56Pit toilet 624 69.33Bucket type 11 1.22Shallow pit 36 4.0Bush 214 23.78Others 1 0.11Total 900 100.0Source: Baseline survey, 2010.
Occupation of respondents
Occupational prestige as one component of SES, encompasses both income and educational
attainments. Occupational status reflects the educational attainment required to obtain the job
and income levels that vary with different jobs and within ranks of occupations. Additionally,
it shows achievement in skills required for the job. Occupational status measures social
position by describing job characteristics, decision making ability and control, and
psychological demands on the job. Occupation is the most difficult factor to measure because
so many exist, and there are so many competing scales. Many scales rank occupations based
on the level of skill involved, from unskilled to skilled manual labor to professional, or use a
combined measure using the education level needed and income involved.
The primary and secondary occupations of the respondents were surveyed and presented in
Table 7. The primary occupations included farming, civil service, trading and business
among others. About 60.67 percent of the respondents are mainly farmers. Also, about 17
percent are civil servants. The respondents that are employees in private companies are only
about 1 percent of the population. The table shows that about 18.45 percent of the
respondents are into paid employment as primary occupation. This implies that majority of
the respondents are independently employed in the private sector.
Table 14: Success of previous collective actions with respect to community development
Response Frequency Percentage
Yes, all were successful 92 10.22
Not all were successful 188 20.89
None was successful 620 68.89
Total 900 100.0
Source: Baseline Survey, 2010
The people’s level of participation in community activities is shown on Table 15. The levels
ranged from very low to very high. About 37.7 percent reported high participation level while
4.33 reported very low participation in community activities in the past three years.
Table 15: Distribution of respondents according to their responses to participation in their communitiesResponse Frequency PercentageVery low 39 4.33Low 67 7.44Average 192 21.33High 340 37.78Very high 262 29.11Total 900 100.0
Source: Baseline Survey, 2010
Table 16 shows the contribution the respondents have made in terms of time and money.
Generally, inhabitants in the sampled communities have contributed to some extent, although
about 24.22 percent have contributed little of nothing in the past three years.
Table 16: Distribution of respondents according to their responses on whether or not they
contribute time and money toward common developmental goals
Response Frequency PercentageThey contribute some 682 75.78They contribute very little or nothing
218 24.22
Total 900 100.0Source: Baseline Survey, 2010
Table 17 shows services where respondents are occasionally denied. They included
education, health services, housing assistance, and agricultural extension among others. The
responses recorded in the table are multiple responses. The responses show that only a very
38
small proportion of the people have been denied social services in the past for various
reasons. Table 18 shows the reasons why some of the respondents were excluded from some
of these services in the past. The reasons included age education, social status, occupation
and language among others. However, these are exceptional cases.
Table 17: Services where respondents are occasionally deniedType of services Yes(%) No.(%)Education/schools 43 (4.78) 857(95.22)Health services/clinic 51(5.67) 849(44.31)Housing assistance 34(3.78) 866(91.32)Job training/employment 78(8.67) 822(91.32)Credit/finance 73(8.11) 827(91.89)Transportation 103(11.44) 797(88.56)Water distribution 111(12.33) 789(87.67)Sanitation services 44(4.89) 856(95.11)Agricultural extension 57(6.32) 843(93.67)Justice/conflict resolution 179(19.89) 72(80.11)Security/police service 61(6.78) 839(93.22)Source: BaselineSurvey, 2010
Table 18: Reasons why some people are excluded from services Yes (%) No (%)
Income 83(9.22) 817(90.78)Occupation 63(7..0) 837(93)Social status 88(9.87) 812(90.22)Age 46(5.11) 854(94.89)Gender 68(7.56) 832(92.44)Race/ethnicity 24(2.67) 876(97.33)Language 31(3.44) 869(96.56)Religious beliefs 136(15.11) 764(84.89)Political affiliation 92(10.22) 808(89.78)Lack of education 83(9.22) 817(90.78)Source: Baseline Survey, 2010
3.7 Participation of the respondents in civic duties
Table 19 shows the distribution of the respondents according to their participation in civic
duties in the past three years. It can be seen that most of the people have participated in most
of these duties. The people are politically and socially active since they have voted in
election, participated in associations, and taken part in election campaign. The respondents
are people that have made effort to identify and to find solutions to their community
problems in the past.
39
Table 19: Distribution of respondents on whether they have done the following activities in
the last three years.
Civic duty Yes (%) Never (%)Voted in the election 780(86.67) 120(13.33)Actively participated in an association
652(72.44) 248(27.56)
Made a personal contact with influential person
498(55.33) 402(44.67)
Made the media interested in a problem
165(18.33) 735(81.67)
Actively participated in an information campaign
417(46.33) 483(53.67)
Actively participated in a election campaign
495(55) 405(45)
Contacted your elected representative
468(52) 432(48)
Talked with other people in your area about a problem
578(64.22) 322(35.78)
Notified the court or police about a problem
194(21.55) 706(78.44)
Made a monetary or in-kind donation
698(77.56) 202(22.44)
Volunteered for a charitable organization
543(60.35) 357(39.67)
Source: Baseline Survey, 2010
Table 20 shows the distribution of the respondents according to whether they have been
approached by someone to take part in some civic duties in the past three years. It can be seen
that there has been a high level of interactions among the people. The people are generally
aware of their civic duties and have built a measure of social capital already which can be
harnessed for collective social actions in their respective communities.
40
Table 20: Distribution of respondents on whether they were approached to do the following
activities in the last 3 years.
Civic duty Yes (%) Never (%)Voted in the election 679(75.44) 221(24.56)Actively participated in an association
382(42.44) 518(57.56)
Made a personal contact with influential person
336(37.33) 564(62.67)
Made the media interested in a problem
307(34.11) 593(65.89)
Actively participated in an information campaign
398(44.22) 502(55.78)
Taken part in a protest march or demonstration
462(51.32) 438(48.67)
Actively participated in a election campaign
124(13.78) 776(86.22)
Contacted your elected representative
347(38.56) 553(61.44)
Talked with other people in your area about a problem
359(39.89) 541(60.11)
Notified the court or police about a problem
114(12.67) 786(87.33)
Made a monetary or in-kind donation
596(66.22) 304(33.78)
Volunteered for a charitable organization
543(60.35) 357(39.67)
Source: Baseline Survey, 2010
41
Chapter Four
DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
OF SAMPLED COMMUNITIES
4.1 NORTHERN SENATORIAL DISTRICT
4.1.1 MADAGALI LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA
Madagali local government area is about 250 kilometers from the state capital Yola. The
LGA is largely dominated by Marghi ethnic group. Other ethnic groups in the area are the
Higgi, Fulani and Matakam people. The following communities were sampled in the local
group and Lokoro workers association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the
economic development of the community. The main productive resource available to the
villagers is their farmland, which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community
has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, ward head, various
association leaders and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by election and it is rotational,
and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is usually
owned by the family
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary and a junior secondary school. The average
time/distance of the schools from within the community is 5-10mins/100 meters. The number
of students currently enrolled in the primary school is 450 comprising of 200 males and 250
females, while that of the secondary school is 60 comprising of 35 males and 25 females. The
teacher to student ratio in the primary school is 1:32, while that of the junior secondary
school is 1:11. The communities using this facility include Kawu, Lakeru, Gunda and
Sukeye. The primary school has 3 class room blocks of 8 classes, while the junior secondary
school has one class room block. In both schools there is a staff room, a pit toilet and no
water supply. The environment is however conducive for meaningful learning.
135
There is a clinic in the community with five medical staff and having 10 beds for patients.
The health center is not furnished and the communities using this facility are Gunda, Kawu,
Sukele and Lokeru. The common ailment afflicting community members is malaria, cough
and diarrhea. The average time to the clinic is 5-10 minutes. There is no water source and no
toilet facilities in the clinic, but there is routine immunization of children less than five years.
There are also 3 herbal traditional healing homes and 1 traditional bone healing home.
The community only source of water is the stream, and the average time to fetch water from
the stream is 30 minutes. The water from this stream is accessible year round but is polluted
as revealed by laboratory analysis; hence there are reported cases of water borne diseases.
About 90% of households have no toilets in their houses; hence use the bush for human waste
disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof
(70%), wood/mud with zinc roof (10%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (15%) and
modern cement block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is very bad and difficult to access. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses. An average
of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community has access to
electricity with 85% of inhabitants connected to public power source. Their main source of
cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and
GLO having strong signals. There is a multipurpose civic center, a customary court and a
market. There is no security post, and no skill acquisition center. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. Religious
body and individuals support the physically challenged and vulnerable groups in the
community. The common environmental problem in the community is erosion, flooding and
bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include portable water, renovation of
health centre, additional class room blocks in secondary school and road construction.
136
4.2.2.4. Chikila
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Chikila is located in Guyuk Local Government Area and is about 25
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Guyuk and 97 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 30 minutes. The community is largely
dominated by the Longuda ethnic group with very few other minority groups such as the
Hausas and Fulanis. There are about 3000 inhabitants in the community with an average
household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Kichumina group, Wunkite youth
club, Women group, Chibakaliwa Gumna group and G20 group in the community with the
aim of improving farming activities, empowerment and enhancing community development
thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive
resource available to the villagers is their farmland, which they highly depend on for their
livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and
the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in
community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head,
ward head, various association leaders and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the
community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by election and it is
rotational, and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is usually
owned by the family
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary and a Government Day secondary school. The average
time/distance of the schools from within the community is 5-10mins/100 meters. The number
of students currently enrolled in the primary school is 530 comprising of 180 males and 350
females, while that of the secondary school is 1500 comprising of 700 males and 800
females. The teacher to student ratio in the primary school is 1:38, while that of the junior
secondary school is 1:75. The communities using this facility include Lamza, Lokeru, Gunda
and Sukeye. The primary school has 4 class room blocks of 10 classes, while the Government
Day secondary school has 6 class room blocks of 12 classes. In both schools there is a staff
room, 3 toilets in the secondary school and 2 toilets in the primary school. However, there is
no water supply. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
137
There is a clinic in the community with nine medical staff and having 10 beds for patients.
The health center is not furnished. The common ailment afflicting community members is
malaria, diarrhea and cholera. The average time to the clinic is 5-10 minutes. There is a well
in the clinic and also one toilet for human waste disposal. There is routine immunization of
children less than five years. There are 4 herbal traditional healing homes and 1 traditional
bone healing home.
The community source of water is a well and a stream, and the average time to fetch water
from the stream is 30 minutes. The water from these water sources is accessible year round
but is not good for human consumption as revealed by laboratory analysis; hence there are
reported cases of water borne diseases. About 90% of households have no toilets in their
houses; hence use the bush and road side bush paths for human waste disposal. The
predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof (70%),
wood/mud with zinc roof (20%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (7%) and modern
cement block with zinc roof (3%).
The road to the community is very bad and difficult to access. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses. An average
of 50 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community has access to
electricity although only 50% of the inhabitants are connected to public power source. The
remaining half still depends on kerosene lantern. Their main source of cooking fuel is
firewood. There is the availability of GSM network but all have weak signals. There is no
multipurpose civic center, but there is market stalls, a court, police station and skill
acquisition centre. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take
care of the vulnerable groups. Religious body and individuals support the physically
challenged and vulnerable groups in the community. The common environmental problem in
the community is erosion, flooding and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include portable water, laterization of the
earthen road, renovation of health centre, additional class room blocks in secondary school
and additional blocks in the market.
138
4.2.2.5. Boshikiri
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Boshikiri is in Dumna ward located in Guyuk Local Government Area and is
about 100 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Guyuk and 110 kilometers from the State
capital Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 45 minutes. There are over 3000
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Wunkithe Development Association
and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities,
empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to
the economic development of the community. The main productive resource available to the
villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community
has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, Amna Puro, Unit head,
leaders of various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the
community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection through
democratic process and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics and civil service. Community land is usually owned
by the community and individual families.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary and secondary school in the community. The average time/distance of the
schools from within the community is 10mins/500 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 1500 comprising of 700 males and 800 females, while in the
secondary school is 600 comprising of 320 males and 280 females. The teacher to student
ratio in the primary school is 1:45, while that in the secondary school is 1:43. The primary
school has 6 classes while the secondary school has 9 classes. In both schools there are staff
rooms and two pit toilets each but no water source. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
There is a clinic in the community with six medical staff. The source of water at the health
centre is a well, and the clinic has 3 beds for patients. There is also a pit toilet where human
139
wastes are disposed. The common ailments treated at the centre include malaria fever and
diarrhea/dysentery.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed by the Local
government in 1976. The average distance to water source is about 400 meters. The common
source of human waste disposal include: bush (80%), pit toilet (10%) and other sources
(10%). Majority of households have no toilets in their houses; hence use the bush for human
waste disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with
thatched roof (55%), wood/mud with zinc roof (25%), mud plastered with cement with zinc
roof (15%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is tarred but may require some rehabilitation. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 1000 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is
connected to public power source although many houses still use kerosene lantern. Their
main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain,
MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center but the
community has a police security post. There is no skill acquisition center and but the
community has a market and a court. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are erosion and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include water, improved health care
facilities and road.
140
4.2.2.6. Tudun Guyuk
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Tudun Guyuk is located in Guyuk Local Government Area and is about 4
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Guyuk and 115 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 25 minutes. There are over 3000
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 9 persons.
There are community development associations such as Women Association and Youth
Association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of
members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic
development of the community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is
their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has
vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, wakili, Amna Puro, Unit
head, leaders of various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the
community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection through
democratic process and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Community land is
usually owned by families.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community. The average time/distance of the schools from
within the community is 5-10mins/400 meters. The number of students currently enrolled in
the primary school is 600 comprising of 250 males and 350 females with the teacher to
student ratio of 1:86. The school has 6 classes of 3 blocks, a staff room and one pit toilet.
There is however no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a clinic in the community with three medical staff and one bed for patients. There is
no water at the clinic but there is a pit toilet where human wastes are disposed. The common
ailments treated at the centre include malaria and diarrhea/dysentery. Additionally, there is
one herbal healing home and one traditional maternity home.
The community source of water is a stream. The average distance to water source is about
1km and inhabitants of the community have to treck for about 30 minutes to fetch water.
141
Laboratory analysis of the water has revealed that it is contaminated and posses serious health
hazard. The common source of human waste disposal is the bush (90%) because majority of
households have no toilet facilities in their houses. The predominant type of housing in the
community is wood/mud with thatched roof (70%), wood/mud with zinc roof (20%), mud
plastered with cement with zinc roof (7%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (3%).
The earthen road to the community is in a very bad shape and makes transportation difficult.
The main means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles
and motor car/buses. An average of 40 vehicles plies the existing community road per week.
Only about 20% of the houses are connected to NEPA with the rest resorting to the use of
kerosene lantern.T Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of
GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. There are two privately
owned multipurpose civic center where people pay for the facility before they could use
them. However, the community has no police security post, no skill acquisition center, no
market stalls and no court. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity
homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the
community are erosion and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include water, improved health care
facilities and road.
142
4.2.2.7. Lakumna
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Lakumna is located in Guyuk Local Government Area and is about 3
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Guyuk and 110 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 25 minutes. There are about 2500
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 8 persons.
There are community development associations such as Women Group and Youth Forum in
the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of members and
enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic development of the
community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which
they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the
disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village
play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head, leaders of various associations and religious leaders who
resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is
usually by selection through democratic process and major decisions are taken collectively.
Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Community land is
usually owned by families.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community. The average time/distance of the school from
within the community is 10-20mins/500 meters. The number of students currently enrolled in
the primary school is 400 comprising of 150 males and 250 females, and with teacher to
student ratio of 1:44. The school has one class room block of 6 classrooms, a staff room and
one pit toilet. There is however no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful
learning.
There is no clinic in the community but there are however 5 herbal healing homes and one
traditional bone healing home.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed in 2002by the local
government. The average distance to water source is about 300meters and the borehole is
function all year round. The common source of human waste disposal is the bush (90%)
because majority of households do not have toilet facilities in their houses. The type of
143
housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof (50%), wood/mud with zinc roof
(30%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (15%) and modern cement block with zinc
roof (5%).
The condition of earthen road to the community is in a very bad shape and makes
transportation difficult. The main means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking,
trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses. An average of 50 vehicles plies the
existing community road per week. The main source of power in the community is kerosene
lantern, while their source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM
network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic
center, no market stalls and no security post. There is however a skill acquisition center
established in 2008 by the government. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are erosion and bush burning. The major community needs according to
priority include water, a clinic, additional classroom blocks in primary school, electricity and
road construction.
144
4.2.2.8. Bobini
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
Bobini community is located in Guyuk Local Government Area and is about 25 kilometers
from the LGA headquarters Guyuk and 135 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The
average time to get to the nearest town is 20 minutes. There are about 8000 inhabitants in the
community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Bobini Development Association,
Gumnama Association, Kungiyan Maharba Association and Youth Association in the
community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of members and
enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic development of the
community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which
they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the
disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village
play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head, unit head, leaders of various associations and religious
leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the
community is usually rotational by selection through democratic process and major decisions
are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Community land is
usually owned by families.
Community infrastructure
There are two primary schools in the community, namely; Bobini I and Bobini II primary
schools. There are also two secondary schools, namely; GDSS Bobini and GJSS Bobini. The
average time/distance of the schools from within the community is 20mins/500 meters. The
number of students currently enrolled in Bobini I primary school is 500 comprising of 150
males and 350 females, while in Bobini II is 250 comprising of 150 males and 100 females.
Consequently, the number of students currently enrolled in GDSS Bobini is 300 comprising
of 180 males and 120 females, while that of GJSS Bobini is 390 comprising of 270 males and
120 females. The teacher to student ratio in the two primary schools is 1:42 and 1:62.5
respectively, while for the secondary schools are 1:60 and 1: 78 respectively. Bobini I
primary school has 4 classes, Bobini II has 3 classes, while GDSS has 9 classes and GJSS has
145
6 classes. GDSS Bobini has a laboratory, while Bobini I primary school has a library. All the
schools have a staff room but only the GDSS has toilet facility for disposal of human waste.
There is no water in all the schools.
There is a primary health centre in the community with 9 staff. Average time to the clinic is 5
minutes. There are ten beds for patients and one pit toilet. There is however no water.
Common ailments treated at the centre are malaria, measles, cholera and common cold. There
is also regular routine immunization of children less than five years. There are also 4 herbal
healing homes and 1 traditional bone healing home.
The community sources of water are: borehole constructed in 1985 and spring water. The
average time to water source is about seven minutes and the borehole is functioning all year
round. The common source of human waste disposal is the bush (70%) because majority of
households do not have toilet facilities in their houses. The type of housing in the community
is wood/mud with thatched roof (60%), wood/mud with zinc roof (20%), mud plastered with
cement with zinc roof (15%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (5%).
The condition of earthen road to the community is very bad and this makes transportation
difficult. The main means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans,
bicycles and motor car/buses. An average of 50 vehicles plies the existing community road
per week. The main source of power in the community is kerosene lantern, while their source
of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain having
strong signal, while GLO has weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no skill
acquisition centres. There are however market stalls, a court and a police station. The
community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable
groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding and
bush burning. The major community needs according to priority include water, a clinic, road
construction, electricity and additional class room blocks in the schools.
146
4.2.2.9 . Gugu
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Guyuk Local Government Area and is about 15 kilometers from
the LGA headquarters Guyuk and 100 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The average
time to get to the nearest town is 20 minutes. There are about 6000 inhabitants in the
community with an average household size of 8 persons.
There are community development associations such as Women Association, Hunters
Association and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, wakili,
Amna Puro, Unit head, leaders of various associations and religious leaders who resolve
disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually
by selection through democratic process and major decisions are taken collectively.
Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, fishing, artisan, hunting and civil service.
Community land is usually owned by families.
Community infrastructure
There are two primary schools in the community, namely; Gugu primary school and
Normadic primary school. The average time/distance of the schools from within the
community is 20mins/500 meters. The number of students currently enrolled in Gugu
primary school is 500 comprising of 200 males and 300 females with teacher to student ratio
of 1:38, while students currently enrolled in Normadic primary school is 300 comprising of
200 males and 100 females with teacher to student ratio of 1:33. Gugu primary school has 5
classes while Normadic primary school has 3 classes. There is however no water but the
environment is conducive for meaningful learning. The communities using this facility are
Dangir and Kwadadai.
147
There is a clinic in the community with three medical staff and one bed for patients. There is
no water at the clinic and no toilet facility where human wastes are disposed. The common
ailments treated at the centre include malaria and diarrhea/dysentery. Additionally, there are
two herbal healing homes and one traditional bone healing home. Patients have to be taken to
bigger hospitals to treat complicated cases like cholera and measles.
The community source of water is a stream. The average distance to water source is about
500 meters. Laboratory analysis of the water has revealed that it is contaminated and posses
serious health hazard. The common source of human waste disposal is the bush (85%)
because majority of households do not have toilet facilities in their houses. The predominant
type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof (75%), wood/mud with
zinc roof (15%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (7%) and modern cement block
with zinc roof (3%).
There is a tarred road to the community and the condition of the road is good. The main
means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor
car/buses. An average of 2000 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. About
40% of the houses in the community are connected to NEPA while the rest resort to the use
of kerosene lantern. Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability
of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. The community has no
multipurpose civic center, no police security post, no skill acquisition center, no market stalls
and no court. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care
of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problem in the community is erosion.
The major community needs according to priority include water, hospital and additional
classroom blocks.
148
4.2.2.10. Pondiwe
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Kola ward of Guyuk Local Government Area and is about 26
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Guyuk and 90 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 30 minutes. There are about 16000 inhabitants
in the community with an average household size of 12 persons.
There are community development associations such as Kafama Women Business
Association, Kulga Farmers Association and Youth Association in the community with the
aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community
development thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main
productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on
for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons,
widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important
role in community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village
head, ward head, leaders of various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes
within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by
election through democratic process and it is rotational. Major decisions are taken
collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, fishing, paid labour and civil service. Community
land is usually owned by families.
Community infrastructure
There are two primary schools in the community, namely; Pondiwe I primary school and
Pondiwe II primary school. The average time/distance of the schools from within the
community is 20mins/500 meters. The number of students currently enrolled in Pondiwe I
primary school is 350 comprising of 150 males and 200 females and with teacher to student
ratio of 1:35, while students currently enrolled in Pondiwe II primary school is 300
comprising of 130 males and 170 females with teacher to student ratio of 1:50. Pondiwe I
primary school has 3 classroom blocks of 7 classes while Pondiwe II primary school has one
classroom block of 2 classes. Both schools have a staff room each, one pit toilet in Pondiwe I
but none in Pondiwe II, and both schools do not have water but the environment is conducive
for meaningful learning.
149
There is a clinic in the community with four medical staff. There is no water at the clinic, no
toilet facility for human wastes disposal and no beds for patients. Average distance of the
facility from the community is 200metres. The common ailment treated at the centre is
malaria. Patients with serious cases have to be taken to bigger hospitals.
The community source of water is a borehole constructed in 2003. The average distance to
water source is about 500 meters. The common source of human waste disposal is the bush
(90%) because most households do not have toilet facilities in their houses. The types of
housing in the community are: wood/mud with thatched roof (65%), wood/mud with zinc
roof (20%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (10%) and modern cement block with
zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and the condition of the road is bad. The main
means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor
car/buses. An average of 50 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The
community is not connected to public source of power; hence kerosene lantern is the only
source of power in the community. Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is
the availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. The
community has no multipurpose civic center, no police security post, no court and no skill
acquisition center but has market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problem in
the community is erosion. The major community needs according to priority include water,
provision of electricity, additional classroom blocks, road construction and equipping the
clinic with all the necessary facilities.
Men FGD session
150
4,2.3. .Demsa Local Government
4.2.3.1. Farai
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Farai is located in Demsa Local Government Area and is about 3 kilometers
from the LGA headquarters Demsa and 30 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The
average time to get to the nearest town is 20 minutes. The community is largely dominated by
the Bachama ethnic. There are about 3000 inhabitants in the community with an average
household size of 10 persons. The major religion in the village is Christianity.
There are community development associations such as Kauna Development Association,
Women Development Association and Youth Association in the community with the aim of
improving farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community
development thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main
productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland and river (for fishing) which
they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the
disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village
play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head, ward head and religious leaders who resolve disputes within
the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by election from
ruling families and it is rotational, and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is
usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activities in the community are farming and fishing with other minor
economic activities such as petty trading, politics, civil service, artisan and hunting.
Community land is usually owned by the community and individuals.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school. The average time/distance of the schools from
within the community is 10-15mins/300 meters. The number of students currently enrolled in
the primary school is 118 comprising of 68 males and 50 females. The teacher to student ratio
in the school is 1:8. The primary school has two blocks of 3 classes and pupils from Nzufel
community also using the facility. In the school there are two staff rooms, no toilet facilities,
no library and no water supply. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a primary health centre in the community with six medical staff. The source of water
at the health centre is a well, and the clinic has only one bed for patients. The communities
using this facility include Babuku, Mwamoh, Nzefel and Bushi where inhabitants have to
151
travel an average distance of 1 Km to access this facility. The common ailments treated at the
centre include malaria fever, diarrhea and common cold.
The community source of water is one hand pump borehole and a well both constructed by
the community. The average distance to water source is about 200 meters. About 95% of
households have no toilets in their houses; hence use the bush for human waste disposal. The
predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof (60%),
wood/mud with zinc roof (15%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (15%) and
modern cement block with zinc roof (10%).
The road to the community is seasonal and difficult to access. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The main source of
power in the community is kerosene lantern (65%) although some are connected to NEPA
(35%). Their main sources of cooking fuel are firewood and kerosene. There is the
availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no
multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no
market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care
of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problem in the community is erosion
and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include improving health care facilities,
siting of a secondary school, provision good drinking water and road construction.
152
4.2.3.2 . Dwam Sakato
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Dwam Sakato is located in Demsa Local Government Area and is about 7
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Demsa and 37 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 35 minutes. The community is largely
dominated by the Bachama ethnic. There are about 3000 inhabitants in the community with
an average household size of 8 persons.
There are community development associations such as Women Development Association
and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities,
empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to
the economic development of the community. The main productive resource available to the
villagers is their farmland and river (for fishing) which they highly depend on for their
livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and
the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in
community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head,
ward head and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they
arise. Leadership in the community is usually by election and major decisions are taken
collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activities in the community are farming and fishing with other minor
economic activities such as petty trading, politics, civil service, artisan and hunting.
Community land is usually owned by the community and individuals.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is no primary or secondary school.
There is a primary health centre in the community with eight medical staff and only 3 beds
for patients. The source of water at the health centre is a well and water from the stream. The
communities using this facility include Goli, Pare, Goro, Kovi, Purdang and Bushi where
inhabitants have to travel an average distance of 1.5Km to access this facility. The common
ailments treated at the centre include malaria fever, diarrhea, labour and common cold. There
is routine immunization of children against killer diseases.
The community source of water is one hand pump borehole provided by the government and
a well constructed by the community. The average distance to water source is about 100
meters. About 55% of households have no toilets in their houses; hence use the bush for
human waste disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with
153
thatched roof (60%), wood/mud with zinc roof (20%), mud plastered with cement with zinc
roof (10%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (10%).
The road to the community is a seasonal road and difficult to access. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The main source of
power in the community is kerosene lantern (40%), NEPA (40%) and other sources (20%).
Their main sources of cooking fuel are firewood and kerosene. There is the availability of
GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose
civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The
community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable
groups. The common environmental problem in the community is erosion, flooding and bush
burning.
The major community needs according to priority include provision good drinking water,
siting of schools, improving health care facilities and road/culverts/bridge construction.
154
4.2.3.3 .Bille
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Bille is located in Demsa Local Government Area and is about 45 kilometers
from the LGA headquarters Demsa and 75 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The
average time to get to the nearest town is 30 minutes. There are about 3000 inhabitants in the
community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Women Development Association
and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities,
empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to
the economic development of the community. The main productive resource available to the
villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community
has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, ward head and religious
leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the
community is usually by selection and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is
usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is
usually owned by the community and individual families.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a central primary school. The average time/distance of the schools
from within the community is 10-15mins/300 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 540 comprising of 240 males and 300 females. The teacher
to student ratio in the school is 1:45. The primary school has six class room blocks and pupils
from Ntorong, Gadamayo and Bamusa communities use this facility. In the school there are
three staff rooms, one library, a toilet and a water source. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
There is a maternity centre in the community with ten medical staff. The source of water at
the health centre is a well, and the clinic has six beds for patients. There is also a pit toilet and
wastes are usually buried. The communities using this facility include Biddah, Gansari and
Ntorong where inhabitants have to travel an average distance of 2 Km to access this facility.
155
The common ailments treated at the centre include malaria fever, diarrhea/dysentery and
vomiting.
The community source of water is one hand pump borehole constructed by the Local
government in 2005. The average distance to water source is about 400 meters. The common
source of human waste disposal include: bush (60%), pit toilet (30%) and VIP toilets (10%).
Majority of households have no toilets in their houses; hence use the bush for human waste
disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof
(45%), wood/mud with zinc roof (10%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (30%) and
modern cement block with zinc roof (15%).
The road to the community is earth road and difficult to access. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 150 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The main source of
power in the community is kerosene lantern (90%) and private generators (10%). The
community is not connected to public electricity. Their main sources of cooking fuel are
firewood and kerosene. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain having strong
signals with weak signals of GLO. There is no multipurpose civic center but the community
has a police security post. There is no skill acquisition center and but the community has a
market and a court. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to
take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problem in the community is
erosion and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include road construction, provision of
electricity, provision good drinking water and improving health care facilities.
156
4.2.3.4. BOLON
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Nassarawo ward of Demsa Local Government Area and is about
9 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Demsa and 40 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 30 minutes. There are about 2000
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 10 persons. Most of the
inhabitants are of the Bachama ethnic group.
There are community development associations such as cultural Association, women
association and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, leaders of
various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection through democratic
means by king makers and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Land ownership in
the community is by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 12 teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 10mins/500 meters. The number of students
currently enrolled in the primary school is 500 comprising of 200 males and 300 females and
with teacher to student ratio of 1:42. There is one class room block of 2 classes in the school
with no facilities like water, toilet or staff room. The lists of communities using the facility
are Dowaya, Gundale, Ndake, Goyire and Anjufuen. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
157
There is a clinic in the community with 2 medical staff. The clinic is not furnished and there
are no beds for patients. There is no water and no toilet facility at the centre. The common
ailments treated at the centre include malaria, diarrhea and labour.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole established in 2008 by the
government. The average distance to water source is 200 meters. The common source of
human waste disposal is the bush (85%) because majority of the houses do not toilets for
human waste disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with
thatched roof (70%), wood/mud with zinc roof (15%), mud plastered with cement with zinc
roof (10%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is a seasonal road and is in a very bad condition. The main means
of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor
car/buses. An average of 50 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The
community is not connected to NEPA, thus, their power source is kerosene lantern; while the
main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain,
MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security
post. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and
bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include improvement of health care
facilities, construction of additional classroom blocks in the primary school, water and
electricity.
158
4.2.3.5. GEJEMBO
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Bille ward of Demsa Local Government Area and is about 25
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Demsa and 45 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 30 minutes. There are about 2500 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 10 persons. Most of the inhabitants are of
the Bille ethnic group.
There are community development associations such as cultural Association, women
association and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, leaders of
various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection through democratic
means by king makers and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Land ownership in
the community is by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary and a Junior secondary school in the community. The average
time/distance of the schools from within the community is 20mins/2km. The number of
students currently enrolled in the primary school is 212 comprising of 132 males and 80
females, while that of the junior secondary school is 60 comprising 40 male and 20 females.
The teacher to student ratio in the primary school 1:35, while that of the secondary school is
1:30. There are two class room blocks of 2 classes each, while the junior secondary school
has only one class room block. There are staff room in both schools but no facilities like
water and toilet. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
159
There is a clinic in the community with 2 medical staff. The clinic is not furnished and there
are two beds for patients. The source of water at the clinic is a borehole but there is no toilet
facility for human waste disposal. The common ailments treated at the centre include malaria,
diarrhea and measles.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole established in 2006 by the local
government which is functional. The average distance to water source is 50 meters. The
common source of human waste disposal is the bush (95%) because most households do not
have toilets for human waste disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community is
wood/mud with thatched roof (80%), wood/mud with zinc roof (10%), mud plastered with
cement with zinc roof (8%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (2%).
The earthen road to the community is a seasonal road and is in a very bad condition. The
main means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and
motor car/buses. An average of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The
community is not connected to NEPA; hence, their main power source is kerosene lantern,
while the main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network,
with Zain and GLO having strong signal while MTN has weak signal. There is no
multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no
market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care
of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the community are
erosion, flooding, deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include improvement of health care
facilities, construction of additional classroom blocks in the primary school, water,
laterization of existing road to the community and provision of electricity.
160
4.2.3.6. DONG
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Demsa Local Government Area and is about 32 kilometers from
the LGA headquarters Demsa and 80 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The average
time to get to the nearest town is 30 minutes. There are over 7000 inhabitants in the
community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Dong Developmet Association,
women association and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving
farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development
thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive
resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their
livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and
the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in
community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head,
leaders of various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the
community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection through
democratic means by king makers and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is
usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Land ownership in
the community is by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 17 teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 10mins/300 meters. The number of students
currently enrolled in the primary school is 1523 comprising of 823 males and 700 females,
and with teacher to student ratio of 1:90. There are two class room blocks of 6 classes, a
toilet, a staff room but with no water facility. The environment is conducive for meaningful
learning.
There is a clinic in the community with 8 medical staff. The clinic is not furnished and there
are 5 beds for patients. There is a borehole at the centre but no toilet facility. The common
ailments treated at the centre include malaria, diarrhea and typhoid fever. There is routine
immunization of children less than 5 years again child-killer diseases. The average time from
the community to access this facility is 5 minutes.
161
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole established in 1980 by the
community and a well. The average distance to water source is 100 meters. The sources of
human waste disposal are the bush (50%), pit toilet (40%) and road side/bush paths (10%).
The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (35%), wood/mud
with zinc roof (45%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (15%) and modern cement
block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is seasonal and is in a very bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 1500 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is
not connected to NEPA; hence, their main power source is kerosene lantern; while the main
source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain and
GLO having strong signals, while MTN has weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic
center and no skill acquisition centre. There are market stalls, a police station and a court.
The community however has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of
the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion
and flooding.
The major community needs according to priority include improvement of health care
facilities, additional boreholes, construction of additional classroom blocks in the primary
school, road construction and provision of electricity.
162
4.2.3.7. Dem
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
Dem community is located in Kpasham ward of Demsa Local Government Area and is about
70 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Demsa and 100 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The length of road to the nearest town is 20km and the average time to get to the
nearest town is 1hour. There are about 2700 inhabitants in the community with an average
household size of 9 persons. The major religion in the village is Christianity.
There are community development associations such as planners group, social group and
women development association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland and river (for fishing) which they highly depend on
for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons,
widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important
role in community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village
head, ward head and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever
they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection and major decisions are taken
collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activities in the community are farming and fishing with other minor
economic activities such as petty trading, politics, civil service, artisan and hunting.
Community land is usually owned by the family.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school. The average time/distance of the schools from
within the community is 20 minutes/1km. The number of students currently enrolled in the
primary school is 300 comprising of 180 males and 120 females. The teacher to student ratio
in the school is 1:18. The primary school has one class room block of 2 classes and pupils
from Kaltanga, Bagban, Bakau and Kegbale communities also use the facility. In the school
there is a staff room, no toilet facilities, no library and no water supply. The environment is
conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a primary health centre in the community with two medical staff. The source of
water at the health centre is a borehole, and the clinic has only two beds for patients. Average
time to access the facility within the community is 5 minutes. The common ailments treated
163
at the centre include malaria and diarrhea. There is routine immunization of children under
the age of five against child-killer diseases.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed in February 2010 by the
community. The average distance to water source is about 200 meters. About 90% of
households have no toilets in their houses; hence use the bush for human waste disposal. The
predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof (80%),
wood/mud with zinc roof (10%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (6%) and modern
cement block with zinc roof (4%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and in very bad condition. The main means
of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor
car/buses. An average of 300 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The main
source of power in the community is kerosene lantern (99%) while the main source of
cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and
GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There
is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as
orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental
problem in the community is erosion and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include additional class room blocks in
primary school, improving health care facilities, provision of additional borehole and road
construction.
164
4.2.3.8. Bwashi
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Demsa Local Government Area and is about 4 kilometers from
the LGA headquarters Demsa and 31 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The average
time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. There are about 2500 inhabitants in the
community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Himbaro Association, Sinda Masha
Association and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, leaders of
various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection through democratic
means by king makers and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Land ownership in
the community is by individuals, family and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 7 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 5mins/200 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 100 comprising of 40 males and 60 females and with teacher
to student ratio of 1:14. There is one class room block of 2 classes in the school with no
facilities like water, toilet or staff room. The environment is conducive for meaningful
learning.
There is no clinic in the community but there is routine immunization of children under the
age of five.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed in 1986 by the
government. The average distance to water source is 200 meters. The common source of
human waste disposal is the bush (90%) because majority of households do not have toilets in
165
their houses. The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (45%),
wood/mud with zinc roof (35%) and mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (20%).
The type of road to the community is seasonal road and is in a very bad condition. The main
means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor
car/buses. An average of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. About
40% of the community is connected to public power source, while the remaining utilize
kerosene lantern. The the main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of
GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose
civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The
community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable
groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion, deforestation
and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include provision of clinic, construction of
additional classroom blocks in the primary school, water and road construction..
166
4.2.3.9.. Old Demsa
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Demsa Local Government Area and is about 3 kilometers from
the LGA headquarters Demsa and 33 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The average
time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. There are about 2700 inhabitants in the
community with an average household size of 9 persons.
There are community development associations such as cultural Association, women
association and Youth Association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, leaders of
various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by election through democratic
means by elders and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activities in the community are farming and fishing with other minor
economic activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Land
ownership in the community is by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 11 teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 10mins/500 meters. The number of students
currently enrolled in Demsa II primary school is 350 comprising of 150 males and 200
females and with teacher to student ratio of 1:32. There are three class room blocks of 9
classes, a staff room but with no facilities like water, toilet, or library. The environment is
conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a clinic in the community with 5 medical staff. The clinic is not furnished and there
is only one bed for patients. The source of water at the clinic is a borehole but there is no
toilet facility. List of communities using this facility include: Dogon Lamba, Mwamoh and
167
Bwashi. The common ailments treated at the centre include malaria and diarrhea. There is
routine immunization of children under the age of five.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole established in 1982 by the
government. The average distance to water source is 200 meters. The common source of
human waste disposal is the bush (85%) because majority of the houses do not toilets for
human waste disposal. The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched
roof (40%), wood/mud with zinc roof (20%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof
(30%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (10%).
The type of road to the community is a seasonal road and is in a very bad condition. The
main means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and
motor car/buses. An average of 50 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. Over
50% of the community is connected to public power source, while the remaining utilize
kerosene lantern. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of
GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose
civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center but there are market
stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the
vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion,
flooding, deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include road construction, improvement of
health care facilities, and construction of additional classroom blocks in the primary school,
water and electricity.
168
4.2.3.10. Farabuane
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Dong ward of Demsa Local Government Area and is about 24
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Demsa and 54 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. There are about 2200 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 9 persons.
There are community development associations such as women association and Youth
Association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of
members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic
development of the community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is
their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has
vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, ward head and religious
leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the
community is usually by selection through democratic means by community elders and major
decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan and hunting. Land ownership in the
community is by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 14 teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 10mins/400 meters. The number of students
currently enrolled in the school is 214 comprising of 116 males and 98 females and with
teacher to student ratio of 1:15. There are two class room blocks of 5 classes, a staff room, 3
pit toilets and a borehole. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a clinic in the community with 2 medical staff. The clinic is not furnished and there
are no beds for patients. There is no water and no toilet facility at the centre. The common
ailments treated at the centre include malaria, typhoid fever, diarrhea and labour.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed in 2004 by the
government. The average distance to water source is 1km and the average time to water
source is 45 minutes. The common source of human waste disposal is the bush (90%)
169
because majority of the houses do not toilet facility for human waste disposal. The
predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof (900%).
The road (earth) to the community is in a very bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is
not connected to NEPA, thus, their power source is kerosene lantern; while the main source
of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain and GLO
having strong signals, while MTN has weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and
no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has
no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and
bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include additional boreholes, construction
of additional classroom blocks in the primary school, improvement of health care facilities
and electricity.
Young girl fetching drinking water from a local source
170
4.3. Central Senatorial District
4.3.1. Girei Local Government
4.3.1.1. Daneyel
Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics of the Community
The village Daneyel is located in the Girei Local Government Area is about 15 kilometers
from the LGA headquarters and 35 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The average time
to get to the nearest town Jabbi-Lamba is 45 minutes because of the bad condition of the
road. The village is largely dominated by the Fulani ethnic group and other minority groups
such as the Hausas and Batas. There are about 3000 inhabitants in the community. The major
religion in the village is Islam. Average household size in the community is 10.
There are community development associations such as Buburma Daneyel Development
Association and Youth Development Association in the community with the aim of
improving farming activities, empowerment and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the village. The resources available to the
villagers are their farmland and animals which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The community head known as Mai-Anguwa solve communal
disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually
by inheritance and is usually done by democratic means. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious. The religious institutions render assistance to the less privileged members of the
society.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service and politics.
Community Infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary and a Junior Secondary School. The average
time/distance of the schools from within the community is 20mins/500 meters. The number
of students currently enrolled in the primary and secondary schools are 300 and 100
respectively. The teacher to student ratio in the primary school is 1:50 while in the secondary
school it is 1:25. The primary and secondary schools have one class room block each of three
171
classes, and each of the school serves five adjoining communities. In the schools there are no
staff room, no toilet facilities and no water supply. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
There is a maternity clinic in the community. The health center is accessed by an estimated
population of 3000 beneficiaries from five communities. The health center is under
renovation and has 7 beds for patients. The common ailment afflicting community members
is malaria. There is regular routine immunization.
The community source of water is hand-pump borehole (2) and concrete wells (2) located
within the community and is easily accessible. The boreholes were constructed in 1984 and
2009 respectively, while the wells were dug in 1990. The water from these sources is of good
quality and there are no reported cases of water borne diseases. Most households have pit
toilet for human waste disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community are
wood/mud with zinc roof (34%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (42%) and
woo/mud with thatched roof (24%).
The only road to the community is difficult to access in the rainy season. There are collapsed
culverts and bridges, and this explains the reason for the time taken to travel to the nearest
town. An average of 5753 people and 150 vehicles ply the existing community road per
week. The community has no access to electricity at present due to abandonment of
electrification project that started some 13 years ago. Most households rely on kerosene
lantern and just few have private generators. Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood.
There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain and GCel having strong signal, while
GLO and MTN have weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post.
There are no skill acquisition center and market stalls in the village. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take of the vulnerable groups.
The major community needs according to priority include water, additional classroom blocks
in primary and secondary school, Laterization of road and construction of culverts/bridges,
and completion of electrification project.
172
4.3.1.2. Kangling
Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics of the Community
The community Kangling is located in Girei Local Government Area and is about 21
kilometers from the LGA headquarters and 45 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The
average time to get to the nearest town is 15 minutes and the length to the nearest town is 5
kilometres. The village is largely dominated by the Bwatiye ethnic group and other minority
groups such as the Hausas and Fulanis. There are about 2500 inhabitants in the community.
The major religion in the village is Christianity. Average household size in the community is
8.
There are community development associations such as Degumun Development Association,
Fukadupwa Development Association and Kangling Development Association in the
community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment and enhancing
community development thereby contributing to the economic development of the
community. The resources available to the villagers are their farmland, water bodies for
fishing and animals which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has
vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, religious leaders and
youth leader who resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in
the community is usually by election and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership
is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activities in the community are fishing, farming and politics with other
minor economic activities such as petty trading, civil service and hunting. Community land is
usually owned by the family
Community Infrastructure
In the community, there is the presence of a primary school. The average time/distance of the
schools from within the community is 10mins/200 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 270 comprising of 180 males and 90 females. The teacher to
student ratio in the primary school is 1:67.5. The primary school has three class room blocks
173
and the school serves adjoining communities. In the school there is a staff room, no toilet
facilities and no water supply. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a maternity clinic in the community with only three medical staff. The health center
is accessed by beneficiaries from Gwa Kra and Garin Kara communities. The health center is
not furnished and has only 2 beds for patients. The common ailment afflicting community
members is malaria and the average time to the clinic is 5-10 minutes. There is a borehole
and a pit toilet in the maternity clinic, and there is also routine immunization. There are also 5
herbal traditional healing homes, 1 traditional maternity home and 1 traditional bone healing
home.
The community source of water is hand-pump borehole and solar borehole located within the
community and is easily accessible. The borehole was constructed in 1984 by the state
government and the solar borehole in 2009 by MDG. The water from these sources are
accessible year round and are of good quality, and there are no reported cases of water borne
diseases. About 50% of households have pit toilet for human waste disposal, while the
remaining use the bush. The predominant type of housing in the community are wood/mud
with thatched roof (48%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (20%), wood/mud with
zinc roof (22%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (10%).
The road to the community is very bad and difficult to access in the rainy season, and there
are collapsed culverts and bridges. The main means of transportation are motorcycles,
canoes, bicycles and motor car/buses. An average of 30 vehicles plies the existing community
road per week. The community has no access to electricity and the major source of power
being kerosene lantern (98%) and private generators (2%). Their main source of cooking fuel
is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having
strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups.
The major community needs according to priority include road construction, water and
extension of existing clinic.
174
4.3.1.3. Dakri Bobbo
Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics of the Community
The community Dakri Bobbo is located in Girei Local Government Area is about 9
kilometers from the LGA headquarters and 7 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The
average time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. There are about 2000 inhabitants in the
community and an average household size of 10.
There are community development associations such as Farmers Association, Cattle Rarers
Association, Fish Sellers Association, Women association Vegetable Sellers Association and
Youth Development Association with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment
and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic development of
the community. The resources available to the villagers are their farmland and animals which
they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The community head known as Mai-Anguwa solve communal
disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually
by election and is usually done by nomination. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious
and community decisions are made through group meeting. The major economic activities in
the community are farming, politics, lumbering and artisans with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service and marketing of agricultural commodities.
Community Infrastructure
In the community, there is the presence of a primary school and a Junior Secondary School.
The average time/distance of the schools from within the community is 10mins/200 meters.
The number of students currently enrolled in the primary school is 400 comprising of 300
males and 100 females, while that of the Junior Secondary School is 450 comprising of 300
males and 150 females. The teacher to student ratio in the primary school is 1:50, while that
in the secondary school is 1:45. Other communities using these schools are Damare and
Labondo where pupils have to treck an average of one and half kilometers. The primary
school has six class rooms, one staff room, no water supply and two pit toilets same with that
of the secondary school. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
175
There is a clinic in the community with two medical staff who are males. The health center is
accessed by inhabitants from seven communities. The health center is furnished and has only
5 beds for patients. There is a borehole and a pit toilet in the clinic, and the average distance
to facility by users is 150 metres. The common ailment afflicting community members is
malaria. There is regular routine immunization.
The community source of water is hand-pump borehole and solar borehole located within the
community and is easily accessible. The hand pump borehole was constructed in 1978 by
UNICEF while the solar borehole was constructed in 2009 by MDG. The water from these
sources is of good quality and there are no reported cases of water borne diseases. Most
households have pit toilet for human waste disposal, while few use the bush. The
predominant type of housing in the community are wood/mud with zinc roof (38%), mud
plastered with cement with zinc roof (32%), wood/mud with thatched roof (23%) and
modern cement block with zinc roof (7%).
The road to the community is very bad and this explains the reason for the time taken to
travel to the nearest town. The community has access to electricity from NEPA although few
households still rely on kerosene lantern and private generators. Their main source of cooking
fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and GLO having
strong signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There are no skill
acquisition center and market stalls in the village. The community has no facilities such as
orphanages, charity homes to take of the vulnerable groups.
The major community needs according to priority include laterization of road, additional
classroom blocks in primary and secondary school, construction of skill acquisition centre
and equipping of the clinic with basic facilities such as delivery kits among others.
176
4.3.1.4 . Koh
Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics of the Community
The community Koh is located in Girei Local Government Area under Gereng ward, and is
46 kilometers from the LGA headquarters and 40 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The
average time to get to the nearest town Gereng is 15 minutes. The community is largely
dominated by the Bwatiye ethnic group and other minority groups such as the Hausas and
Fulanis. There are about 2900 inhabitants in the community. Average household size in the
community is 10.
There are community development associations such as Fishermen Association, Farmers
association and hunters association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the
economic development of the village. The resources available to the villagers are their
farmland and river (for fishing) which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The
community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The community head known as Khalifa and religious leaders solve
communal disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community
is usually by election and is usually done by democratic means. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious. The religious institutions render assistance to the less privileged members of
the society.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, fishing and politics.
Community Infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school and a Day Secondary School. The average
time/distance of the schools from within the community is 10mins/300 meters. The number
of students currently enrolled in the primary and secondary schools are 290 and 200
respectively. The primary school comprised of 124 males and 166 females, while the
secondary school comprised of 112 males and 88 females. The teacher to student ratio in the
primary school is 1:29. The primary and secondary schools share the same three class room
177
blocks and each of the school serves three communities, namely; Yolde, Ndika and Jam. In
the schools there are no staff room, no toilet facilities and no water supply. The environment
is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a maternity clinic in the community. The health center is accessed by inhabitants
from five communities, namely; Koh, Jatau, Kangling, Faweire and Yolde. The health center
has 10 beds for patient, a borehole and a pit toilet. The common ailment afflicting community
members is malaria and diarrhea/dysentery. There is regular routine immunization.
Additionally, there are also 4 herbal healing homes, 6 maternity homes and 2 traditional bone
healing homes.
The community source of water is a hand-pump borehole constructed in 1986 by the state
government and a well located within the community. Both facilities are easily accessible.
Most households have no toilet facility for human waste disposal; hence have to use the bush.
The predominant type of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (80%),
wood/mud with zinc roof (8%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (10%) and modern
cement block with zinc roof (2%).
The only road to the community is difficult to access in the rainy season and there are
collapsed culverts and bridges. An average of 1000 people and 50 vehicles ply the existing
community road per week. The community has no access to public electricity and most
households rely on kerosene lantern and just few have private generators. Their main source
of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN and
GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There
is no skill acquisition center but there is a weekly market. The community has no facilities
such as orphanages, charity homes to take of the vulnerable groups.
The major community needs according to priority include supply boreholes, additional
classroom blocks in primary and secondary school, Laterization of road and construction of
culverts/bridges.
178
4.3.1.5. Njerenga
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Girei II ward of Girei Local Government Area and is about 5
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Girei and 20 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 15 minutes. There are about 1800 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 9 persons.
There are no community development associations in the community. The main productive
resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their
livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and
the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in
community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the community
head (Jauro) and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they
arise. Leadership in the community is usually done by appointment from the village head and
major decisions are taken by collective deliberation. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading and cattle rearing. Land ownership system in the community is
by individuals and the community.
Community Infrastructure
There is no school in the community; hence pupils have to trek to schools in neighbouring
communities. There is also no clinic in the community but there is however routine
immunization. There is however one herbal healing home and one traditional bone healing
home.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed by the government. The
average distance to water source is 100 meters and the water is available all year round. The
common source of human waste disposal is the pit toilet (100%). while the type of housing in
the community is wood/mud with thatched roof (100%).
179
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and is in a bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and pick up vans. An average of 30
vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to
public source of power; hence, households depend on kerosene lantern as power source.
Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network,
with MTN, Zain and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and
no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has
no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, deforestation and bush
burning.
The major community needs according to priority include clinic, primary school, good access
road and electricity.
180
4.3.1.6. Jerra Boyo
Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics of the Community
The community is a ward in Girei Local Government Area and is about 35 kilometers from
the LGA headquarters Girei and 40 kilometers from the State capital Yola. The average time
to get to the nearest town is 40 minutes. There are about 7, 000 inhabitants in the community
with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Hunters association and Farmers
association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of
members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic
development of the community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is
their farmland and animals which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community
has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the Village head (Maijamila), Jauros and religious leaders who
resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is
usually by inheritance and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious. The community is dominated by Fulani ethnic group and with other minor
ethnic groups such as Bwatiyes and the Hausas. The dominant religion is Islam.
The major economic activities in the community are farming and rearing of animals, while
minor economic activities include petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service.
Communal system of land ownership prevails in the community.
Community Infrastructure
There are 4 primary schools in the community, namely; Jerra Boyo (having 6 classrooms),
Gada mayo (having 5 classrooms), Kara (having 2 classrooms) and Abba Murke primary
school (having 5 classrooms). There is also a Junior secondary school in the community. The
average time/distance of the schools from within the community is 20mins/500meters. The
number of students currently enrolled in Jerra Boyo primary school is 600 comprising of 400
males and 200 females, and with teacher to student ratio 1:67; Gada Mayo primary school has
400 pupils comprising of 250 males and 150 females and with teacher to students ratio of
1:80; Karal primary school has 250 pupils comprising of 150 males and 100 females and with
teacher to students ratio of 1:83, and Abba Murke primary school has 300 pupils comprising
181
of 170 males and 130 females and with teacher to students ratio of 1:43. The secondary
school has a student population of 100 comprising of 63 males and 37 females and with
teacher to students ratio of 1:14. The lists of communities using these facilities are Abba
Murke, Passa Gida, Wuro mala and Fadde Jauro. There is a staff room in all the schools,
Jerra Boyo and Gada Mayo have one toilet facility each, while Jerra Boyo and Abba Murke
have boreholes to provide the water needs of the schools. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
There is a maternity clinic in the community with only one qualified medical staff. The clinic
is furnished and has 9 beds for patients. The source of water at the clinic is a borehole and
there is toilet for human waste disposal. The common ailment treated at the centre is malaria,
minor accident cases and labour. The average distance to facility by user is 300meters.
The community sources of water are hand pump boreholes and industrial borehole. and all
are functional. The average distance to water source is 100 meters. The common source of
human waste disposal is pit toilet (100%), while the types of housing in the community are
wood/mud with thatched roof (30%), wood/mud with zinc roof (40%), mud plastered with
cement with zinc roof (20%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (10%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and there are so many collapsed culverts and
bridges. Accessibility is usually a problem during heavy storms. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. An average of 500 vehicles
plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to public
source of power; hence, most households use kerosene lantern with very few personal
generators. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM
network but all have weak signals. There is no multipurpose civic center, no market stalls and
no security post, but there is however a skill acquisition center. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and
bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include electrification of the community,
construction of additional classroom blocks in the Junior secondary school, upgrading of the
maternity clinic since it is serving many communities and laterization of existing road to the
community.
182
4.3.1.7. Laide Danfulani
Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics of the Community
This community is located in Damare ward of Girei Local Government Area and is about 9
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Girei and 4 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The length of road to the nearest town is 3km and the average time to get to the nearest town
is 10 minutes. The estimated population of the community is 2500 with an average household
size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Farmers Association, Youths
association and Women association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the
economic development of the community. The main productive resource available to the
villagers is their farmland, which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, various
association leaders and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by inheritance and major
decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as hired labour, petty trading, civil service and artisan. Community land is
usually owned by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school with 26 teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 20mins/1km. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 450 comprising of 250 males and 200 females. The teacher
to student ratio in the school is 1:17. The school has 4 class room blocks of 6 classes, 2 staff
rooms, 2 toilets but no water facility. The communities using this facility are Badirisa, Laide
and Bajabure Federal Housing. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is no clinic in the community, but there is routine immunization of children under the
age of five years.
183
The community source of water is a well and a hand pump borehole. The average time and
distance to water source is 10minutes/500meters and the water is accessible throughout the
year. Majority of households in the community (90%) have pit toilets in their houses. The
types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (20%), wood/mud with
zinc roof (50%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (25%) and modern cement block
with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and is in a bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 20 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not
connected to public power source; hence inhabitants use kerosene lantern (100%) for source
of power in the community. Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the
availability of GSM network, with Zain, GLO and MTN having strong signals. There is no
multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center but there
are market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take
care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the community are
deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include road construction, construction of
additional class room blocks, a clinic, boreholes and electricity.
184
4.3.1.8. Dakri Alhaji Bakari
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the communityThe community is located in Dakri ward of Girei Local Government Area and is about 9
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Girei and 7 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
There are about 2000 inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 8
persons.
There are community development associations in the community such as development
association, youths association and farmers association with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leader in the community is the village head who in
collaboration with elders, leaders of various associations and religious leaders resolve
disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually
by election and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, lumbering, politics, artisan and hired labour. Land ownership
in the community is by individuals.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school and a junior secondary school in the community. The average
time/distance of the school from within the community is 15mins/300 meters. The number of
students currently enrolled in the primary school is 400 comprising of 300 males and100
females, and with teacher to student ratio of 1:50; while that of the junior secondary school is
430 comprising of 230 males and 200 females. Both schools have 2 classroom blocks each,
one toilet but no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a dispensary in the community with 4 medical staff. The average distance to facility
by users is 500meters. The source of water at the center is a borehole and there is pit toilet.
The common ailment treated at the centre is malaria. There is routine immunization of
children.
185
The community source of water is borehole and the average distance to water source is
50meters. The source of human waste disposal in the community is the pit toilet. The types of
housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (20%), wood/mud with zinc roof
(30%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (45%) and modern cement block with zinc
roof (5%).
The road network to the community is good. The main means of transportation are
motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. The community is connected to public source
of power. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM
network, with Zain, MTN, GCel and GLO have strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic
center and no police station. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The
community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable
groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding,
deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include water, skill acquisition centers and
market.
186
4.3.1.9.Bajabure
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Damare ward of Girei Local Government Area and is about 9
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Girei and 2 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
There are about 3000 inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 7
persons.
There are community development associations in the community such as hunters association
and youths association with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of
members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic
development of the community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is
their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has
vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leader in the community is the village head who in collaboration with
elders, leaders of various associations and religious leaders resolve disputes within the
community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by inheritance and
major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan and hired labour. Land ownership in the
community is by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school and a junior secondary school in the community. The average
time/distance of the school from within the community is 10mins/500 meters. The number of
students currently enrolled in the primary school is 1018 comprising of 302 males and716
females, and with teacher to student ratio of 1:23; while that of the junior secondary school is
135 comprising of 55 males and 80 females. Both schools have 5 classroom blocks each, staff
rooms and toilet facilities. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a dispensary in the community with 6 medical staff. The average distance to facility
by users is 500meters. There is no water and toilet facility at the center. The common ailment
treated at the centre is malaria. There is routine immunization of children.
The community source of water is borehole and the average distance to water source is
50meters. The common source of human waste disposal in the community is the pit toilet.
187
The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (20%), wood/mud
with zinc roof (30%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (35%) and modern cement
block with zinc roof (15%).
The road network to the community is not tarred and is in bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. The community is
connected to public source of power. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is
the availability of GSM network, with Zain, MTN, GCel and GLO have strong signals. There
is a multipurpose civic center and market stalls. There is however no skill acquisition center
and no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and
bush burning. The major community needs according to priority include road, additional
classroom blocks, water and quarters for the clinic staff.
188
4.3.1.10. Karewa
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Girei I ward of Girei Local Government Area and is about 7
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Girei and 17 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
There are about 2000 inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 10
persons.
There are community development associations in the community such as hunters
association, Miyetti Allah association and farmers association with the aim of improving
farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development
thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive
resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their
livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and
the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in
community development activities. The main leader in the community is the Jauro who in
collaboration with elders, leaders of various associations and religious leaders resolve
disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually
by selection and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, hunting, politics, artisan and hired labour. Land ownership is
by inheritance and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 8 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 10mins/300 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the school is 300 comprising of 200 males and100 females, and with teacher to
student ratio of 1:42. The school has 2 classroom blocks, no staff room, no toilet and no
water. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is no clinic in the community. Their source of water is a borehole constructed in 1984
and the average distance to water source is 100meters. The source of human waste disposal in
the community is the pit toilet. The type of housing in the community is wood/mud with
thatched roof (100%).
189
The road network to the community is in bad condition. The main means of transportation
are motorcycles, trekking and bicycles. The community is not connected to public source of
power. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM
network, with Zain, MTN, GCel and GLO have strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic
center and no police station. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The
community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable
groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding,
deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include clinic, road construction and
additional boreholes.
A youth FGD session
190
4.3.2. GOMBI LOCAL GOVERNMENT
4.3.2.1. Gadamaisaje
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community Gadamaisaje is located in Gombi Local Government Area and is about 3
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 117 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 25 minutes. There are 2800 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 10 persons. Most of the inhabitants are
Hausa migrants who have settled there for a long time.
There are community development associations such as Gadamaisaje Community
Development Association, Zumunci Community Association, First Aid Group and Youth
Association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of
members and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic
development of the community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is
their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has
vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head (Jauro), wakili, leaders of
various associations and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by selection through democratic
process and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, hunting and civil service. Land ownership in
the community is by individuals, inheritance and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community without structures but with 3 teachers. The
average time/distance of the schools from within the community is 10mins/500 meters. The
number of students currently enrolled in the primary school is 110 comprising of 62 males
and 48 females with teacher to student ratio of 1:37. There are no classes in the school let
alone facilities like water, toilet or staff room. Pupils receive lectures under tree shade. The
environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
191
There is no clinic or any health facility. The community source of water is a hand pump
borehole established in 2008 and a well dug in 1963. The average distance to water source is
150 meters. Laboratory analysis of the well water has revealed that it is contaminated and
posses serious health hazard. The common source of human waste disposal is the pit toilet
(95%). The predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with thatched roof
(80%), wood/mud with zinc roof (15%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (3%) and
modern cement block with zinc roof (2%).
The earthen road to the community is in a very bad shape and makes transportation difficult.
The main means of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, trucks/pick up vans, bicycles
and motor car/buses. An average of 40 vehicles plies the existing community road per week.
The community is not connected to NEPA, thus, their power source is kerosene lantern. Their
main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain,
MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security
post. There is no skill acquisition center but there are market stalls. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, deforestation and bush
burning.
The major community needs according to priority include primary school, clinic, water and
electricity.
192
4.3.2.2 .Parijo
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Guyaku ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is about
16 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 128 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. The estimated population of
the community is 2,000 with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as youth association and religious
groups in the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment and
enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic development of the
community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland, which
they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the
disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village
play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head (jauro), various association leaders and religious leaders who
resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is
usually by election and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is usually
owned by individuals and family.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school with ten teachers. The average time/distance of
the schools from within the community is 30mins/3km. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 216 comprising of 100 males and 116 females. The teacher
to student ratio in the school is 1:22. The school has three class room blocks of nine classes
where pupils from neighbouring community Tuffa also use the facility. There is no staff
room, no toilet facilities and no water supply in the school. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
There is no clinic in the community but there are 3 herbal traditional healing homes.
However, there is regular routine immunization of children under the age of five years. The
community source of water is a hand pump borehole provided by the state government in
193
1999. The average time to fetch water from the borehole is 5 minutes and the water is
accessible year round. About 95% of households have pit toilets in their houses for human
waste disposal. The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof
(40%), wood/mud with zinc roof (35%), and mud plastered with cement with zinc roof
(25%).
The road to the community is not tarred and is in a very bad shape. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is
not connected to public power source; hence majority of the inhabitants use kerosene lantern
(99%) and with very few private generators (1%). Their main source of cooking fuel is
firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain, having strong signals while
MTN and GLO have weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post.
There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such
as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common
environmental problems in the community are deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include well equipped health centre,
additional boreholes, construction of additional classroom blocks in the primary school, road
construction, and electricity supply.
194
4.3.2.3. Mijuwana
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Guyaku ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is about
16 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 126 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The length of road to the nearest town is 2km and the average time to get to the nearest
town is 10 minutes. The estimated population of the community is 2,000 with an average
household size of 8 persons.
There are community development associations such as youth association, women
association and farming association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the
economic development of the community. The main productive resource available to the
villagers is their farmland, which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head (Jauro),
various association leaders and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually democratic and major decisions
are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is usually
owned by individuals.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school with ten teachers. The average time/distance of
the schools from within the community is 10mins/200meters. The number of students
currently enrolled in the primary school is 186 comprising of 80 males and 106 females. The
teacher to student ratio in the school is 1:19. The school has only one class room block but in
a very bad condition. The roof is blown off by windstorm; hence pupils attend classes under
trees and in the classes with blown-off roof. Any time it rains there would be no school. The
primary school is used by 4 neighboring communities. There is no staff room, no toilet
195
facilities and no water supply in the school but the environment is conducive for meaningful
learning.
There is a dispensary in the community with 4 medical staff. The dispensary is not furnished
and there are no beds for patients. The average distance to the facility is 400 meters. There is
no toilet facility in the dispensary and no water. However, there is regular routine
immunization of children under the age of five years. The common ailment treated at the
dispensary is malaria. Additionally, the community has one herbal healing home and one
traditional bone healing home.
The community source of water is a well dug two years ago by the community. The average
time to fetch water from the well is 5 minutes and the water is accessible year round. Water
from the well is however of good quality from the result of the analysis. About 95% of
households have pit toilets in their houses for human waste disposal. The types of housing in
the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (40%), wood/mud with zinc roof (35%),
and mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (25%).
The road to the community is not tarred and in a bad shape. The community is not accessible
whenever there is a heavy downpour. The main means of transportation are motorcycles,
trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses. An average of 200 vehicles plies
the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to public power
source; hence majority of the inhabitants use kerosene lantern (99%) and with very few
private generators (1%). Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the
availability of GSM network, with Zain, having strong signals while MTN and GLO have
weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include construction of additional class
room blocks and renovating the existing ones, renovating the existing dispensary, boreholes,
road construction and electricity.
196
4.3.2.4. Bebe
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Guyaku ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is about
18 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 124 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The length of road to the nearest town is 18km and the average time to get to the
nearest town is 1 hour. The estimated population of the community is 1200 with an average
household size of 8 persons. The major ethnic group of the inhabitants is Hona.
There are community development associations such as youth association and women
association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment
and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic development of
the community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland,
which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such
as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the
village play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head (Jauro), various association leaders and religious leaders who
resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is
usually democratic and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is usually
owned by individuals.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school with six teachers. The average time/distance of
the schools from within the community is 5mins/100meters. The number of students
currently enrolled in the primary school is 170 comprising of 80 males and 90 females. The
teacher to student ratio in the school is 1:28. The school has only one functional class room
block of two classes. The other two blocks built with mud have collapsed and the building
taken over by grasses. The primary school is used by 3 neighboring communities, namely;
Yilaba, Sabon Kaura and Farmichu. There is no staff room, no toilet facilities and no water
supply in the school but the environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
197
There is a dispensary in the community with 4 medical staff. The dispensary is not furnished
and there are four beds for patients. The average distance to the facility is 200 meters. There
is no toilet facility in the dispensary and no water. However, there is regular routine
immunization of children under the age of five years. The common ailment treated at the
dispensary is malaria and diarrhea. The communities using this facility are Chiyana, Yilaba,
Farmichu, Gulba, Kuluwa and Diya. Additionally, the community has four herbal healing
homes.
The community sources of water include a shallow well located about 1km away from the
community and a well within the community. There is serious water problem in the dry
season due to the drying up of the wells; hence so many shallow wells are dug around fadama
area to access water. Laboratory analyses of water from the two wells reveal that the water is
not good for drinking because it poses serious health hazard. This is the reason for the
frequent cases of typhoid fever and cholera in the community. The average time to fetch
water from the shallow well is 20 minutes. About 98% of households have no toilet facilities
in their houses; hence use the bush for human waste disposal. The types of housing in the
community are wood/mud with thatched roof (90%) and wood/mud with zinc roof (10%).
The road to the community is seasonal and in a very bad shape. The community is not
accessible whenever there is a heavy downpour. The main means of transportation are
motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses. An average of 10
vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to
public power source; hence majority of the inhabitants use kerosene lantern (99%) and with
very few use private generators (1%). Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is
the availability of GSM network, with Zain, having strong signals while MTN has weak
signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include drilling of boreholes, road
construction, renovation of the dispensary, renovation of collapsed classroom blocks, and
electricity supply.
198
4.3.2.5. Gudumiya
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Gombi North ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is
about 7 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 122 kilometers from the State
capital Yola. The length of road to the nearest town is 7km and the average time to get to the
nearest town is 45 minutes. The estimated population of the community is 2500 with an
average household size of 7 persons.
There are community development associations such as Kauna Group, youth association,
women association and farming association in the community with the aim of improving
farming activities, empowerment and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland, which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head, various
association leaders and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually democratic and major decisions
are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is usually
owned by individuals.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school with 11 teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 20mins/1km. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 350 comprising of 150 males and 200 females. The teacher
to student ratio in the school is 1:32. The school has only one class room block and the
communities using this facility are Mutila and Mallam Sanda. There is a staff room, no toilet
facilities and no water supply in the school but the environment is conducive for meaningful
learning.
199
There is no clinic in the community, therefore sick people are taken to Gombi Cottage
Hospital. However, there is regular routine immunization of children under the age of five
years.
The community source of water is a well dug in 1963 by the community. The average time
to water source is 10 minutes and the water is accessible throughout the year. Water from the
well is however of good quality from the result of the analysis. About 90% of households
have pit toilets in their houses for human waste disposal. The type of housing in the
community is wood/mud with thatched roof (95%) and wood/mud with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is not tarred and is in a bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 20 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not
connected to public power source; hence inhabitants use kerosene lantern (100%) for source
of power in the community. Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the
availability of GSM network, with Zain and MTN having strong signals. There is no
multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center but there
are market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take
care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the community are
deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include construction of additional class
room blocks, a clinic, boreholes, road construction and electricity.
200
4.3.2.6. Jau
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Guyaku ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is about
36 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 146 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The length of road to the nearest town is 1km and the average time to get to the nearest
town is 10 minutes. The estimated population of the community is 2500 with an average
household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as youth association and Fiter/Shama in
the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment and enhancing
community development thereby contributing to the economic development of the
community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland, which
they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the
disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village
play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head (Jauro), various association leaders and religious leaders who
resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is
usually democratic and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, lumbering, civil service and artisan. Community land is
usually owned by individuals and families.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school with eight teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 20mins/2km. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 187 comprising of 95 males and 92 females. The teacher to
student ratio in the school is 1:23. The school has two class room blocks. There is a staff
room, no toilet facilities and no water supply in the school but the environment is conducive
for meaningful learning.
201
There is a clinic in the community with 5 medical staff and 4 beds for patients. The average
distance to the facility is 2km. There is no toilet facility at the clinic but there is a borehole.
There is routine immunization of children under the age of five years. The common ailment
treated at the clinic is malaria. Other communities using this facility are Marja and Pirkasa.
Additionally, the community has five herbal healing homes and one traditional bone healing
home.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed in 2001 by the local
government. The average distance/time to water source is 1km/10minutes and the water is
available throughout the year. About 95% of households have no toilet facility in their
houses; hence use the bush for human waste disposal. The types of housing in the community
are wood/mud with thatched roof (70%), wood/mud with zinc roof (20%), mud plastered
with cement with zinc roof (3%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (7%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and is in a bad shape.The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 50 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not
connected to public power source; hence majority of the inhabitants use kerosene lantern
(99%) and with very few private generators (1%). Their main source of cooking fuel is
firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain and MTN having strong
signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill
acquisition center but there are market stalls. The community has no facilities such as
orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental
problems in the community are deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include additional borehole, construction
of additional class room blocks and renovating the existing ones and electricity.
202
4.3.2.7. Sabon Gari
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Gombi North ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is
about 5 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 120 kilometers from the State
capital Yola. The length of road to the nearest town is 5km and the average time to get to the
nearest town is 30 minutes. The estimated population of the community is 2000 with an
average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as youth association and farmers
association in the community with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment
and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic development of
the community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland,
which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such
as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the
village play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head, various association leaders and religious leaders who resolve
disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually
democratic and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, artisan and hunting. Community land is usually
owned by individuals.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is no primary school as a result pupils enroll in neighboring primary
schools. There is also no clinic but there is routine immunization of children under the age of
five years. The community source of water is a hand pump borehole constructed in 1985 by
the local government. The average time to water source is 5 minutes and the water is
available throughout the year. About 99% of households have pit toilets in their houses for
human waste disposal. The predominant type of housing in the community is wood/mud with
thatched roof (98%).
203
The road to the community is currently under construction. The main means of transportation
are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses. An average of
10 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to
public power source; hence the inhabitants use kerosene lantern (100%). Their main source of
cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain, having strong
signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include establishment of a primary school,
provision of a clinic and electricity.
204
4.3.2.8. Korwa B
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Gombi south ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is
about 2 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 115 kilometers from the State
capital Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 20 minutes. There are about 2600
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Jama’are youth development
association and Miyetti Allah development association in the community aimed at improving
farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development
thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive
resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their
livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and
the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in
community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the community
head (Jauro) and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they
arise. Leadership in the community is usually done through selection by elders in the
community and major decisions are taken by voting after deliberation. Leadership is usually
stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, cattle rearing, paid labour, artisan, politics and civil service.
Land ownership system in the community is by individuals, family and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school and a community secondary school in the community. The average
time/distance of the schools from within the community is 15mins/500meters. The number of
students currently enrolled in the secondary school is 1300 comprising of 700 males and 600
females with teacher to student ratio 1:38, while the number of students currently enrolled in
the primary school is 350 comprising of 150 males and 200 females, and with teacher to
student ratio 1:50. The secondary school has 6 classroom blocks and a staff room, while the
primary school has no structure on ground; pupils receive instruction under the tree. There is
a pit toilet in the secondary school but none in the primary school. There is however no water
facility in both schools. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
205
There is no clinic in the community but there is however routine immunization. There are
three herbal healing homes, one traditional maternity home and two traditional bone healing
home.
The community source of water is a well dug in 1976. The average distance to water source is
50 meters and the water from this source is available all year round. The common source of
human waste disposal is the pit toilet (100%). while the types of housing in the community
are wood/mud with thatched roof (50%), wood/mud with zinc roof (30%), mud plastered
with cement with zinc roof (15%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and is in a bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and pick up vans. An average of 60
vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to
public source of power; hence, households depend on kerosene lantern as power source. The
main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with
MTN, Zain and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no
security post. There is no skill acquisition center but there are market stalls. The community
has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and
bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include clinic, electricity and additional
boreholes.
206
4.3.2.9. Kaulewa
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Garkida ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is about 36
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 151 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 15 minutes. There are about 1500
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 7 persons.
There are community development associations such as Youth association, women
associatrion and women religious group in the community aimed at improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the community ward head and
religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership
in the community is both by election and inheritance, and major decisions are taken by
collective action. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, paid labour, artisan, politics and civil service. Land ownership
system in the community is by families.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community. The average time/distance of the schools from
within the community is 15mins/500meters. The number of students currently enrolled in the
primary school is 126 comprising of 56 males and 70 females, and with teacher to student
ratio 1:18. The primary school has one classroom block of 2 classes, a staff room, and two
toilets for human waste disposal. There is however no water facility in the school. The lists of
communities using this facility are Fwahar, Kallewa and Mbewa. The environment is
conducive for meaningful learning.
There is no clinic in the community but there is however routine immunization. There are two
traditional maternity homes.
207
The community source of water is a stream. Laboratory analysis of the water reveals that it is
polluted and not good for human consumption, and this may be the reason for cases of water
borne diseases in the community. The average distance to water source is 1km and the
average time to water source is 20 minutes. The common sources of human waste disposal
are pit toilet (60%) and bush (40%), while the types of housing in the community are
wood/mud with thatched roof (20%), wood/mud with zinc roof (10%), mud plastered with
cement with zinc roof (65%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and is in a bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, buses, trekking, bicycles and pick up vans. An average of 60
vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to
public source of power; hence, households depend on kerosene lantern (90%) and private
generators (10%) as source of power. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is
the availability of GSM network, with MTN, Zain and GLO having strong signals. There is
no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no
market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care
of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the community are
erosion, deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include construction of additional
classroom blocks in the primary school, water and road construction.
208
4.3.2.10. Barda
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
This community is located in Gabun ward of Gombi Local Government Area and is about 40
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Gombi and 146 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The length of road to the nearest town is 5km and the average time to get to the nearest
town is 45 minutes. The estimated population of the community is 3000 with an average
household size of 10 persons.
There are community development associations such as Fadama Users Association, Miyetti
Allah association and youth association in the community with the aim of improving farming
activities, empowerment and enhancing community development thereby contributing to the
economic development of the community. The main productive resource available to the
villagers is their farmland, which they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community
has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children.
Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community development
activities. The main leaders in the community are the village head (Jauro), various association
leaders and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise.
Leadership in the community is usually by election and major decisions are taken
collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, civil service, hired labour, artisan and hunting. Community
land is usually owned by the family.
Community infrastructure
In the community, there is a primary school with 3 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 10mins/300meters. The number of pupils currently
enrolled in the primary school is 125 comprising of 70 males and 55 females. The teacher to
student ratio in the school is 1:42. The school has only one class room block of 2 classes and
the communities using this facility are Kantanbata, Gwalbokaja, Ber, Dunu and Barda II.
Pupils from these communities have to trek an average of 2km to access the facility. There is
a staff room, no toilet facilities and no water supply in the school but the environment is
conducive for meaningful learning.
There is no clinic in the community; hence patients are either taken to Gombi Cottage
Hospital or Garkida hospital. There is routine immunization of children under the age of five
209
years. There are 3 herbal healing homes, 5 traditional maternity homes and 1 traditional bone
healing home.
The community sources of water include hand pump borehole a well and stream. The average
time/distance to water source is 20minutes/500meters. About 90% of households do not have
toilet facilities in their houses; hence use the bush for human waste disposal. The types of
housing in the community include; wood/mud with thatched roof (75%), wood/mud with zinc
roof (20%) and mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and is in a bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trucks/pick up vans, trekking, bicycles and motor car/buses.
An average of 250 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is
not connected to public power source; hence inhabitants use kerosene lantern (100%) for
source of power in the community. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the
availability of GSM network, with Zain and MTN having strong signals, while GLO has
weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill
acquisition center but there are market stalls. The community has no facilities such as
orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental
problems in the community are deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include construction of additional class
room blocks, a clinic, boreholes, road construction and electricity.
Community needs assessment session
210
4.3.3. Fufore Local Government
4.3.3.1.. Belichiuti
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Beti ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about 7
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 29 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 20 minutes. There are about 2800 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 12 persons.
Belichiuti development association is a community development association with the aim of
improving farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community
development thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main
productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on
for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons,
widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important
role in community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the
community head (Lawan) and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by inheritance and major
decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, cattle rearing, hunting and civil service. Land
ownership in the community is by individuals and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 4 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 10mins/500meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 500 comprising of 300 males and 200 females, and with
teacher to student ratio 1:125, while that of the secondary school is 1:30. The school has one
class room block. There is a staff room in the school but no toilet and water facilities. The
environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a clinic in the community with 2 medical staff. The clinic is not furnished and there
are no beds for patients. The source of water at the clinic is a borehole but there is no toilet
facility for human waste disposal. The common ailment treated at the centre is malaria. The
average distance to facility by user is 300meters.
211
The community sources of water are two hand pump boreholes constructed in 1992 and
2008 by the local government and are functional. The average distance to water source is 100
meters. The common source of human waste disposal is pit toilet (100%), while the types of
housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (80%), wood/mud with zinc roof
(10%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (6%) and modern cement block with zinc
roof (4%).
The earthen road to the community is in a very bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. An average of 40 vehicles
plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to public
source of power; hence, their main power source is kerosene lantern, while that of cooking
fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with MTN, Zain and GLO having
strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security post. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include improvement of health care
facilities, construction of additional classroom blocks in the primary school, water,
laterization of existing road to the community and provision of electricity.
212
4.3.3.2. Wuro Sham
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Mayo-Inne ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about
95 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 61 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. There are about 2000
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There is a community development association in the community with the aim of improving
farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development
thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive
resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their
livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and
the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in
community development activities. The main leaders in the community are the community
head (Jauro) and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they
arise. Leadership in the community is usually by election and major decisions are taken
collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan, cattle rearing, hunting and civil service. Land
ownership in the community is by individuals.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 8 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 20mins/1000meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 123 comprising of 75 males and 48 females, and with
teacher to student ratio 1:15. The school has two classroom blocks. There is a staff room and
a toilet in the in the school but no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful
learning.
There is no clinic in the community but there are 10 herbal healing homes and 1 herbal bone
healing home.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole and a well. The average distance to
water source is 100 meters. The sources of human waste disposal are pit toilet (40%) and
bush (60%); while the types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof
(80%), wood/mud with zinc roof (10%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (6%) and
modern cement block with zinc roof (4%).
213
The earth road to the community is in a very bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. An average of 35 vehicles
plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to public
source of power; hence, households use kerosene lantern, while the main source of cooking
fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with MTN and Zain having strong
signals, while GLO has weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center but there is police
station. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and
bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include portable water, electrification of
the community and clinic.
214
4.3.3.3. Wuro Ardo
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Beti ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about 12
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 16 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. There are about 2800 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 10 persons.
The youth development association of the community is aimed at improving farming
activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development thereby
contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive resource
available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly depend on for their livelihood.
The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled persons, widows and the less
privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an important role in community
development activities. The main leaders in the community are the community head (Jauro)
and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise.
Leadership in the community is usually by inheritance and major decisions are taken
collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, cattle rearing and civil service. Land ownership system in the
community is by individuals, inheritance and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 21 teachers. The average time/distance of
the school from within the community is 15mins/600meters. The number of students
currently enrolled in the primary school is 200 comprising of 120 males and 80 females, and
with teacher to student ratio 1:10. The school has two classroom blocks and a staff room.
There are however no toilet and no water facilities. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
There is a clinic in the community with 6 medical staff. The clinic is not furnished and there
is only one bed for patients. The source of water at the clinic is a borehole and there is also a
pit toilet for human waste disposal. The common ailment treated at the centre is malaria. The
average distance to facility by user is 500meters. There are two herbal healing homes and one
traditional bone healing home.
215
The community sources of water are hand pump borehole constructed in 2003 and a well
dug in 1081. The average distance to water source is 200 meters. The water in these sources
are available all year round. The common sources of human waste disposal are pit toilet
(85%) and bush (15%). while the types of housing in the community are wood/mud with
thatched roof (70%), wood/mud with zinc roof (25%) and mud plastered with cement with
zinc roof (5%).
The earthen road to the community is in a good condition. The main means of transportation
are motorcycles, trekking and bicycles. An average of 40 vehicles plies the existing
community road per week. About 50% of the community is connected to public source of
power; while half of the community depends on kerosene lantern as power source. The main
source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with MTN,
Zain and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no security
post. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and
bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include provision of additional boreholes,
supplying medical facilities at the clinic and construction of additional classroom blocks in
the primary school.
216
4.3.3.4. Wuro-Mallum
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located Ribadu Ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about 10
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 55 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 45 minutes. There are about 3000 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 10 persons.
There are community development association in the community with the aim of improving
farming activities, empowerment of members and enhancing community development
thereby contributing to the economic development of the community. The main productive
resources available to the villagers are their farmland and river (fishing) which they highly
depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled
persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an
important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the community are
the district head, community head (Mai-Anguwa) and religious leaders who resolve disputes
within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is through
inheritance from the ruling class and major decisions are taken by collective decision.
Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activities in the community are farming and fishing, with other minor
economic activities such as petty trading, cattle rearing, paid labour, hunting, politics and
civil service. Land ownership system in the community is mainly the communal type.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 5 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 10mins/200meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the school is 420 comprising of 120 males and 300 females with teacher to student
ratio of 1:84. The school has 3 class room blocks of 6 classes, a staff room, 4 pit toilets and a
borehole. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is no clinic in the community but there is however routine immunization. The
community has functional hand pump borehole (provided by LEEMP) that supply their water
need. The average distance to water source is 100 meters and the water from this source is
available all year round. The common source of human waste disposal is the pit toilet
(100%). while the types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof
217
(50%), wood/mud with zinc roof (30%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (10%)
modern cement block with zinc roof (10%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and requires rehabilitation. The main means
of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, buses, bicycles and pick up vans. About 100
vehicles plies the existing community road per week. About 30% of households in the
community are connected to public source of power, while the remaining 70% either use
kerosene lantern or private generators. Their main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There
is the availability of GSM network, with MTN having strong signal. There is no multipurpose
civic center and no security post. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The
community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable
groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding,
deforestation and poaching.
The major community needs according to priority include clinic, construction of additional
classroom blocks in primary school and road construction.
218
4.3.3.5. Dulo BwatiyeSocioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Ribadu ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about 21
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 54 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 40 minutes. There are about 1500 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 8 persons.
The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly
depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled
persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an
important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the community are
the village head, the elders and religious leaders who resolve disputes within the community
whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually by inheritance and major
decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activities in the community are farming and fishing with other minor
economic activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan and civil service. Land ownership
in the community is by family and the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 5 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 10mins/100meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the primary school is 200 comprising of 90 males and 110 females, and with
teacher to student ratio 1:40. The school has two classroom blocks of 5 classrooms. There is a
no staff room and no toilet facilities in the school. The environment is conducive for
meaningful learning.
There is a dispensary in the community with 3 staff. The building is dilapidated with no beds
for patients and no toilet facility. The average distance to facility by users is 300meters and
the common ailments treated at the centre are malaria, cold and typhoid fever.
The community source of water is river Benue and a well. The main source of human waste
disposal is the bush (95%) because households do not have toilet facility in their houses. The
types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (50%), wood/mud with
zinc roof (30%) and mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (20%).
The earth road to the community is in a very bad condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, canoes and bicycles. An average of 20 vehicles plies
219
the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to public source of
power; hence, households use kerosene lantern, while the main source of cooking fuel is
firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with MTN, GLO and Zain having strong
signals. There is no multipurpose civic center but there is a police station. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are erosion, flooding and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include portable water, additional
classroom blocks in the primary school, electricity, good road network and renovating and
stocking the dispensary with all the necessary equipment.
220
4.3.3.6. Muninga
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Gurin ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about 34
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 60 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
The average time to get to the nearest town is 30 minutes. There are about 6309 inhabitants in
the community with an average household size of 7 persons.
There are community development associations in the community such as Women
Association, Muninga rice farmers association and Muninga Development Foundation
scheme with the aim of improving farming activities, empowerment of members and
enhancing community development thereby contributing to the economic development of the
community. The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which
they highly depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the
disabled persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village
play an important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the
community are the village head, leaders of various associations and religious leaders who
resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is
usually by election through democratic means and major decisions are taken collectively.
Leadership is usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan and civil service. Land ownership in the
community is by the community.
Community infrastructure
There is a public primary school and junior secondary school in the community. The average
time/distance of the schools from within the community is 20mins/1km. The number of
students currently enrolled in the primary school is 420 comprising of 240 males and 400
females, and with teacher to student ratio of 1:70, while the number of students currently
enrolled in the junior secondary school is 90 comprising of 60 males and 30 females, and
with teacher to student ratio of 1:14. The primary school has 4 classroom blocks of 12
classes, while the secondary school has 2 classroom blocks of 5 classes. There is a staff room
in schools, toilet but no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning. The
communities using this facility are Fema and Guduwo
221
There is a dispensary and a maternity clinic in the community. The average distance to
facility by users is 400 meters. The source of water at the centre is a well but there is no toilet
facility at the dispensary. The common ailments treated at the centre are malaria, minor
ailments and labour. There are 3 herbal healing homes and 2 traditional bone healing homes.
The community source of water is a hand pump borehole and a well. The average distance to
water source is 100 meters. The sources of human waste disposal are pit toilet (80%) and
bush (15%) and others (5%). The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with
thatched roof (40%), wood/mud with zinc roof (45%), mud plastered with cement with zinc
roof (10%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is season and not motorable around August and September. The
main means of transportation are motorcycles, canoe, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. An
average of 100 vehicles plies the existing community road per week. The community is
connected to public source of power although many households still rely on kerosene lantern.
Thee main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with
Zain having strong signal, while MTN has weak signal. There is no multipurpose civic center
but there is a police station. There is no skill acquisition center and no market stalls. The
community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable
groups. The common environmental problems in the community are erosion, flooding,
deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include road, construction of additional
classroom blocks in primary and secondary school, upgrading the clinic and establishment of
skill acquisition centers.
222
4.3.3.7. Mayo Sirkan
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Mayo-Inne ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about
105 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 75 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. The average time to get to the nearest town is 10 minutes. There are about 1500
inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 10 persons.
The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly
depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled
persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an
important role in community development activities. The main leaders in the community are
the village head (Jauro), elders, leaders of various associations and religious leaders who
resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is
usually by election and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable
and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, politics, artisan and hired labour. Land ownership in the
community is by individuals and family.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 5 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 20mins/1km. The number of students currently enrolled
in the school is 178 comprising of 96 males and 82 females, and with teacher to student ratio
of 1:36. The primary school has 1 classroom block, no staff, no toilet facility and no water.
The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a dispensary in the community with 4 medical staff. The average distance to facility
by users is 500 meters. There is no water and no toilet facility at the dispensary. The common
ailments treated at the centre are malaria and dysentery. There are 2 herbal healing homes.
The community source of water is a well. The source of human waste disposal is the pit toilet
The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (45%), wood/mud
with zinc roof (35%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (15%) and modern cement
block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is in bad condition and is not tarred. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. An average of 20 vehicles
223
plies the existing community road per week. The community is not connected to publicsource
of power. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM
network, with Zain having strong signal, while MTN has weak signal. There is no
multipurpose civic center and no police station. There is no skill acquisition center and no
market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care
of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in the community are
erosion, flooding, deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include water, electricity and road.
224
4,3,3,8. Wuro Yolde
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Gurin ward ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about
25 kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 50 kilometers from the State capital
Yola. There are about 3000 inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 8
persons.
The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly
depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled
persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an
important role in community development activities. The main leader in the community is the
village head who in collaboration with elders, leaders of various associations and religious
leaders resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the
community is usually by election and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is
usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, fishing, lumbering, politics, artisan and hired labour. Land
ownership in the community is by individuals and family.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 9 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 15mins/300 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the school is 272 comprising of 170 males and102 females, and with teacher to
student ratio of 1:30. The primary school has 3 classroom blocks of 6 classes, a staff room, no
toilet facility and no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a dispensary in the community with 4 medical staff. The average distance to facility
by users is 1km. The source of water at the center is a borehole. However, there is no toilet
facility. The common ailment treated at the centre is malaria. There is routine immunization
of children. There are 5 herbal healing homes and 2 traditional bone healing homes.
The community source of water is a borehole and the average distance to water source is
50meters. The source of human waste disposal in the community is the pit toilet. The types of
housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (50%), wood/mud with zinc roof
(35%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (12%) and modern cement block with zinc
roof (3%).
225
The road to the community is tarred and is in good condition. The main means of
transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. The community is
connected to public source of power. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is
the availability of GSM network, with Zain having strong signal, while MTN and GLO have
weak signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no police station. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include water, electricity, skill acquisition
center and provision of necessary facilities at the dispensary.
226
4.3.3.9. Bengo
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Pariya ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about 77
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 41 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
There are about 3000 inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 6
persons.
The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly
depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled
persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an
important role in community development activities. The head of the community is the Ardo
who in collaboration with elders, leaders of various associations and religious leaders resolve
disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the community is usually
by inheritance and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is usually stable and
harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, fishing, artisan and hired labour. Land ownership in the
community is the communal type.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 6 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 10mins/300 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the school is 170 comprising of 100 males and70 females, and with teacher to
student ratio of 1:29. The primary school has 3 classroom blocks of 6 classes, no staff room,
no toilet facility and no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is a dispensary in the community with 6 medical staff. The average distance to facility
by users is 1km. There is no water at the center, no toilet facility and only one bed for
patients. The common ailments treated at the centre are diarrhea and malaria. There is routine
immunization of children.
The community source of water is a borehole and a well. The average distance to water
source is 400meters. The sources of human waste disposal in the community are the pit toilet
(45%) and the bush (55%). The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with
thatched roof (30%), wood/mud with zinc roof (25%), mud plastered with cement with zinc
roof (35%) and modern cement block with zinc roof (10%).
227
The road to the community is not tarred and is in very deplorable condition. The main means
of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. The community is not
connected to public source of power. The main source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is
the availability of GSM network, with Zain having strong signal, while MTN and GLO have
weak signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no police station. There is no skill
acquisition center and no market stalls. The community has no facilities such as orphanages,
charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The common environmental problems in
the community are erosion, flooding, deforestation and bush burning.
The major community needs according to priority include electricity, functional clinic,
additional classroom blocks in the primary school and road construction.
228
4.3.3.10. Wailare
Socioeconomic and Demographic characteristics of the community
The community is located in Pariya ward of Fufore Local Government Area and is about 66
kilometers from the LGA headquarters Fufore and 42 kilometers from the State capital Yola.
There are about 2700 inhabitants in the community with an average household size of 10
persons.
The main productive resource available to the villagers is their farmland which they highly
depend on for their livelihood. The community has vulnerable groups such as the disabled
persons, widows and the less privileged children. Informal institutions in the village play an
important role in community development activities. The main leader in the community is the
village head who in collaboration with elders, leaders of various associations and religious
leaders resolve disputes within the community whenever they arise. Leadership in the
community is usually by election and major decisions are taken collectively. Leadership is
usually stable and harmonious.
The major economic activity in the community is farming with other minor economic
activities such as petty trading, lumbering, politics, artisan and hired labour. Land ownership
in the community is by family.
Community infrastructure
There is a primary school in the community with 9 teachers. The average time/distance of the
school from within the community is 10mins/400 meters. The number of students currently
enrolled in the school is 500 comprising of 220 males and280 females, and with teacher to
student ratio of 1:55. The primary school has 2 classroom blocks of 5 classes, a staff room, no
toilet facility and no water. The environment is conducive for meaningful learning.
There is no clinic in the community but there are herbal healing homes, traditional bone
healing homes and traditional maternity homes.
The community source of water is a well and a stream, and the average distance to water
source is 500meters. The source of human waste disposal in the community is the pit toilet.
The types of housing in the community are wood/mud with thatched roof (30%), wood/mud
with zinc roof (35%), mud plastered with cement with zinc roof (30%) and modern cement
block with zinc roof (5%).
The road to the community is not tarred (earth) and is in very bad condition. The main means
of transportation are motorcycles, trekking, bicycles and motor cars. Half of the community is
229
connected to public source of power while the remaining half use kerosene lantern. The main
source of cooking fuel is firewood. There is the availability of GSM network, with Zain,
MTN and GLO having strong signals. There is no multipurpose civic center and no police
station. There is no skill acquisition center but there are market stalls. The community has no
facilities such as orphanages, charity homes to take care of the vulnerable groups. The
common environmental problems in the community are erosion, deforestation and bush
burning.
The major community needs according to priority include provision of solar borehole with
overhead tank, clinic and electricity.
230
Section Five
HIGHLIGHTS OF MAJOR FINDINGS
There is an organizational leadership systems in all the communities through which
members are involved in activities happening within the communities. Community
organisations are common in all the communities. The Fadama Community
Association (FCA) and Fadama User Groups (FUG) are also present in many of the
communities.
Motorcycle is the principal mode of transportation in these communities. Aside from
this the people do a lot of trekking in order to get one point from another. This is due
to the poor nature of the roads in these communities. These roads are in dire need of
repairs, rehabilitation and in most cases re-construction.
Farming is the most common economic activity in the communities.
The people live in mud houses with zinc roofs. For human waste disposal the people
use pit latrines commonly as well as the bush.
Kerosene lanterns is the source of light during the night hours while firewood is used
for cooking.
Erosion, bush burning and deforestation are some of the common environmental
problems in all the communities.
Road, water, electricity and schools are the most pressing needs of the communities.
There are schools in most of the communities but the schools lack basic educational
facilities like sufficient classrooms, adequate supply of desks and benches, toilet
facilities and water among others.
There is a Primary Health Centre or dispensary in most communities however, the
clinics lack basic facilities and amenities that would enable them to function
efficiently. The clinics are not maintained and are manned by untrained or unskilled
staff. There are no drugs at these clinics.
Water supply: There are boreholes or well in most of the communities. Most of these
boreholes and wells are not functional. In some cases the boreholes are not in use due
to some minor repairs that they require. This has contributed to serious water scarcity
in most communities such that some of them water from streams and rivers for
drinking and other domestic purposes. Drinking from these sources of contaminated
water usually predispose the people to risk of contracting diseases such as cholera,
231
dysentery and diarrhea This high risk of public health hazard is attested to by the
result of water samples that were taken for laboratory analyses.
Conclusion
Based on the findings above, it can be concluded as follows: Government at all levels and
other development partners have made effort to alleviate the suffering of the people at the
grassroots. However, due to increase in human population the infrastructural facilities on
ground are over- stretched. This is evidenced by the very high school enrollment in primary
schools with virtually no facilities for effective teaching and learning. Dispensaries built to
cater for less than a thousand people in the 1980s now cater for over 10, 000 people in most
cases. This is not different for roads, as settlements have sprung up where there were no
houses before. Such area would also have needs for water and other facilities. There is need
for increase in infrastructure to match increase in population.
There is total disregard for maintenance of infrastructural facilities. Once any infrastructure is
on ground the providers and beneficiaries do not make provision for maintenance and
sustainability of such facilities. This has given rise to several non-functional boreholes, wells,
dilapidated or collapsed primary schools while pupils continue to take lessons under trees and
use stones and other objects for seats. In the case of dispensaries and PHC clinics several of
them have been taken up by dangerous reptiles.
Quality of public infrastructure is another case. Contractors and other project providers
deliberately use low quality materials to execute government projects. This has left several
laudable projects non-functional shortly after such projects are commissioned.
Recommendations
There are community based organisations in every community. These organisations can be
charged with the responsibility of maintenance to ensure sustainability of these projects in the
communities.Quality of public infrastructure should be checked.
232
Appendix I: Report of water sample analysis.
Sample Parameter Health impact1. Dulo/Bwatiye a.NO3(nitrate)
b.total coliforme
c.Therotolerant coliform (E. coli)
-Blue baby syndrome in infants under 3 months;-indication of feacal contermination.-meningitis, disrrhea (one of the main cause of mobidity and mortality among children). Urinary tract infections.
2. Vizik (foot) a.pH
b.Fe2+ (iron)
-consumer acceptability. No health impact
3. Bebe a.pHb.Thermotolerantc. Fe2+ (iron)
-consumer acceptability. No health impact.- meningitis, disrrhea (one of the main cause of mobidity and mortality among children). Urinary tract infections.-Brown coloured teeth (no health implicati0on)
4. Muchala a. Nitrateb. Fluoride (F)
-Blue baby in infants under three months-Fluorosis (bones and teeth) morbidity – teeth mottle.
-Indication of feacal contermination- meningitis, disrrhea (one of the main cause of mobidity and mortality among children). Urinary tract infections.
233
Appendix II
THE ADAMAWA STATE BASELINE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CSDA)
COMMUNITY INTERVIEW CHECKLIST Questionnaire No............
Name of Community.............................................................................................................
Venue of FGD
Date of FGD
Name of Enumerator Name of supervisor
Number of participants Men
Women
Youths
Contact person in community Phone number of contact person
Time started Time ended
A. Social Characteristics1. What is the average household size in your community?..........2. What is the number of males in an average household/......3. What is the number of females in an average household/......4. What is the number of adults (18+) in an average household/......5. What is the number of males in an average household/......6. What is the number of children (18 yrs and below)in an average household/......
B. Social /Political organisation1. Type of community/settlement...........................i. Urban ii. Semi urban iii. Rural2. Ward......................................................LGA:..................................................................
...3. Distance of community to LGA Headquarters...................................Km4. Distance of community to state capital.............................................Km5. Head of community.............................................................................6. What is the estimated population of the community?..................................................7. Which is the topmost decision making organ of your community?.......................8. Which other organ of village organisation do you have? Age Grades, Dev.
Association, Unions etc in order of importance?..................................................................................................................................................................................................
234
9. Chieftaincy matters/Traditional power structure (Rotational, monarchy, Royal families etc).........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. What land ownership system do you have here? Communal, family, or individual?................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
C. Ethnic composition1. Major or dominant
tribe......................................................................................................................2. Other sub-group or
tribes..................................................................................................................3. Major language
spoken........................................................................................................................4. List three dominant non-indigenous groups in order of size.
D. Markets1. Do you have a market? i. YES, ii. NO2. How far away is the market from the Chief’s house?.............km3. How regular is the market?.......................................................
E. Means of Transportation in the communityCode: 1 = very used, 2 = used, 3 = rarely used, 4 = not used
s/N Means of transportation Rank
1. Bicycle
2. Motorcycle
3. Trekking
4. Canoe
5. Engine boat
6. Motor car/bus
7. Trucks /pick up vans
8. Heavy duty haulage vans
9. Others (specify)
235
1. What are the type of roads in the community? i. Earth, ii. Tarred, iii. Others (specify)2. Length of road to nearest town.....................km3. Condition of road i. Very good, ii. Good, iii. Bad, iv. Very bad4. Average time to nearest town..............km5. Average number of vehicles using the road per week................6. Average number of persons using the road per week........................
F. Please rank or indicate population by economic activities in the community*Most common, ** least common
S/N Activity Rank Population involved
1. Farming
2. Fishing
3. Civil service
4. Company work
5. Lumbering (wood cutting)
6. Petty trading
7. Hunting
8. Artisan
9. Hired labour
10. Politics
11. Others (specify)
G. Type of housing in community
Types of houses Number of houses
Wood/mud with Thatched roof
Wood/mud with zinc roof
Mud plastered with cement with zinc roof
Modern cement block with zinc roof
Others (specify)
236
H. Human waste disposal
S/N Waste disposal method Number of households
1. Modern waste cistern
2. VIP toilet
3. Pit toilet
4. Bush
5. River/river bank
6. Road side/bush paths
7. Others (specify)
I. Source of power in community
Power source No. Of households (home consumption)
No. Of persons (Business consumption)
Working status
NEPA (Public source)
Private generator
Kerosene lantern
Community generator
Others (specify)
J. Type of cooking fuel used in the community (Rank: 1=Not used, 2=Rarely used, 3= Always used)
Type of cooking fuel Rank
Firewood
Kerosene
Gas
237
Electricity
Others (specify)
K. Telecommunication: Availability of GSM network
Network Strong signal Weak signal Not available
MTN
Zain
GLO
Others (specify)
L. Environmental problems in the community
Environmental problem Mitigation measure adopted (indicate provider where applicable)
Erosion
Waste management
Flooding
Deforestation
Poaching
Landslides
Bush burning
Others (specify)
M. Recreational facilities/Tourism
Types of leisure facilities Number in the community
Hotels
Brothels
Night clubs
Beer parlours
Restaurants
238
Town halls
Play grounds
Others (specify)
N. List NGOs in the community and their tasks
Community organisation Major functions
O. Community awareness of LEEMP/CSDA in Adamawa State; i. Aware, ii Not awareP. Did your community benefit from LEEMP/CSDA in Adamawa State? i. Yes; ii. NoQ. If yes, what
5. Type of area: Urban ( ); Rural (); Easy access (); Difficult access ()
6. Address of selected household:
Community.............................................................. Street......................................................................... House number.......................................................... Other details............................................................
B. Personal Information
S/N Question Response Code1. Sex of respondent Male 1 1
Female 22. Age of respondent 10-19 years
20-29 years30-39 years40-49 years50-59 years60-69 years70-79 yearsAbove 79 years
12345678
2
3. Marital status SingleMarriedDivorced/separatedWidow/widower
1234
3
4. If married, number of wives
1....2....3....More than 4....
1234
4
5. Is this your indigenous
Yes...No...
12
5
248
community?
C. Educational achievement of respondents
1. Please indicate your highest educational qualification
Highest level of Education (Tick one)
Whether completed or not
Code
None () Completed ()Not completed ()
78
Primary () Completed ()Not completed ()
910
JSS III () Completed ()Not completed ()
1112
WAEC/SSCE/GCE?Teachers Grade II
() Completed ()Not completed ()
1314
OND () Completed ()Not completed ()
1516
Degree/HND () Completed ()Not completed ()
1718
2. Please, provide the following information on the educational qualification
of persons in your household.Educational qualification
E. Recreation and quality of life/domestic inventory
S/N Question Response Code1. What do you do at
your spare timeRelax and sleep at homeGo to swimPlay outdoor gamesVisit and chat with friendsWatch moviesOther (specify)
123456
30
F. Organizational Density and Characteristics1. Are you or is someone in your household a member of any groups, organizations, or associations? YES ( );
NO ( )
2. Do you consider yourself/household member to be active in the group, such as by attending meetings or volunteering your time in other ways, or are you relatively inactive? Are you/household member aleader in the group?
HouseholdMember
(use roster code)
Name of organization Type of organization(use codes below)
Degree of participation(use code below)
252
Degree of participation
Leader 1Very active 2Somewhat active 3Not active 4
3. Which of these groups is the most important to your household?(List up to three by name and code type of organization.)
Group 1: ______________________ [ ]
Group 2: ______________________ [ ]
Group 3: ______________________ [ ]
G. Networks and Mutual Support Organizations
Now I am going to ask you some questions about how the community functions and deals with problems.
1. If the primary school of this village/neighborhood went without a teacher for a long time, say six months or more, which people in this village/neighborhood do you think would get together to take some action about it?
Yes NoNo one in the village/ neighborhood would get together [ ] 1 [ ] 2 (if yes, go to question 4B.3)Local/municipal government [ ] 1 [ ] 2Village/neighborhood association [ ] 1 [ ] 2Parents of school children [ ] 1 [ ] 2The entire village/ neighborhood [ ] 1 [ ] 2Other (specify) [ ] 1 [ ] 2
2. Who would take the initiative (act as leader)?
________________________________________
253
3. If there were a problem that affected the entire village/neighborhood, for instance (RURAL: “crop disease”; URBAN: “violence”), who do you think would work together to deal with the situation?
Yes NoEach person/household would deal with the problem individually [ ] 1 [ ] 2 (if yes, go to section 4C)Neighbors among themselves [ ] 1 [ ] 2Local government/municipal political leaders [ ] 1 [ ] 2All community leaders acting together [ ] 1 [ ] 2The entire village/ neighborhood [ ] 1 [ ] 2Other (specify) [ ] 1 [ ] 2
4. Who would take the initiative (act as leader)?
H. Exclusion
1. Differences often exist between people living in the same village/neighborhood. To what extent do differences such as the following tend to divide people in your village/neighborhood?
Not at all Somewhat Very much
a. Differences in education [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3b. Differences in wealth/ material possessions [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3c. Differences in landholdings [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3d. Differences in social status [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3e. Differences between men and women [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3f. Differences between younger and older generations [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3g. Difference between long- time inhabitants and new settlers [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3h. Difference in political party affiliations [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3i. Differences in religious beliefs [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3j. Differences in ethnic background [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3k. Other differences (specify) [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3
2. Do these differences cause problems?
Yes [ ] 1No [ ] 2 (go to question 4C.5)
254
3. How are these problems usually handled?
Yes Noa. People work it out between themselves [ ] 1 [ ] 2b. Family/household members intervene [ ] 1 [ ] 2c. Neighbors intervene [ ] 1 [ ] 2d. Community leaders mediate [ ] 1 [ ] 2e. Religious leaders mediate [ ] 1 [ ] 2f. Judicial leaders mediate [ ] 1 [ ] 2
4. Do such problems ever lead to violence?
Yes [ ] 1No [ ] 2
5. Are there any services where you or members of your household are occasionally denied service or have only limited opportunity to use?
8. What are the reasons or criteria why some people are excluded from these services?
Yes Noa. Income level [ ] 1 [ ] 2b. Occupation [ ] 1 [ ] 2c. Social status (class, caste) [ ] 1 [ ] 2d. Age [ ] 1 [ ] 2e. Gender [ ] 1 [ ] 2f. Race/ethnicity [ ] 1 [ ] 2g. Language [ ] 1 [ ] 2h. Religious beliefs [ ] 1 [ ] 2i. Political affiliation [ ] 1 [ ] 2j. Lack of education [ ] 1 [ ] 2
I. Previous Collective Action
1. In the past year, how often have members of this village/neighborhood gotten together and jointly petitioned government officials or political leaders with village development as their goal?
Never [ ] 1 (go to question 4D.3)Once [ ] 2A couple of times [ ] 3Frequently [ ] 4
2. Was this action/were any of these actions successful?
Yes, all were successful [ ] 1
256
Some were successful and others not [ ] 2No, none were successful [ ] 3
3. How often in the past year have you joined together with others in the village/neighborhood to address a common issue?
Never [ ] 1Once [ ] 2A couple of times [ ] 3Frequently [ ] 4
4. In the last three years have you personally done any of the following things: Yes No
a. Voted in the elections [ ] 1 [ ] 2b. Actively participated in an association [ ] 1 [ ] 2c. Made a personal contact with an influential person [ ] 1 [ ] 2d. Made the media interested in a problem [ ] 1 [ ] 2e. Actively participated in an information campaign [ ] 1 [ ] 2f. Actively participated in an election campaign [ ] 1 [ ] 2g. Taken part in a protest march or demonstration [ ] 1 [ ] 2h. Contacted your elected representative [ ] 1 [ ] 2i. Taken part in a sit-in or disruption of government meetings/ offices [ ] 1 [ ] 2j. Talked with other people in your area about a problem [ ] 1 [ ] 2k. Notified the court or police about a problem [ ] 1 [ ] 2l. Made a monetary or
in-kind donation [ ] 1 [ ] 2m. Volunteered for a charitable organization [ ] 1 [ ] 2
257
5. Have you been approached by someone personally during the last three years who asked you to do any of the following:
Yes Noa. Vote in the elections [ ] 1 [ ] 2b. Actively participate in an association [ ] 1 [ ] 2c. Make a personal contact with an influential person [ ] 1 [ ] 2d. Make the media interested in a problem [ ] 1 [ ] 2e. Actively participate in an information campaign [ ] 1 [ ] 2f. Actively participate in an election campaign [ ] 1 [ ] 2g. Take part in a protest march or demonstration [ ] 1 [ ] 2h. Contact your elected representative [ ] 1 [ ] 2i. Take part in a sit-in or disruption of government meetings/offices [ ] 1 [ ] 2j. Talk with other people in your area about a problem [ ] 1 [ ] 2k. Notify the court or police about a problem [ ] 1 [ ] 2l. Make a monetary or in-kind donation [ ] 1 [ ] 2m. Volunteer for a charitable organization [ ] 1 [ ] 2
6. If some decision related to a development project needed to be made in this village/neighborhood, do you think the entire village/neighborhood would be called upon to decide or would the community leaders make the decision themselves?
The community leaders would decide [ ] 1The whole village/neighborhood would be called [ ] 2
7. Overall, how would you rate the spirit of participation in this village/neighborhood?
Very low [ ] 1Low [ ] 2Average [ ] 3High [ ] 4Very high [ ] 5
8. How much influence do you think people like yourself can have in making this village/neighborhood a better place to live?
A lot [ ] 1Some [ ] 2Not very much [ ] 3None [ ] 4
258
J. Conflict Resolution
1. In your opinion, is this village/neighborhood generally peaceful or conflictive?
Peaceful [ ] 1Conflictive [ ] 2
2. Compared with other villages/neighborhoods, is there more or less conflict in this village/neighborhood?
More [ ] 1The same [ ] 2Less [ ] 3
3. Do people in this village/neighborhood contribute time and money toward common development goals?
They contribute some or a lot. [ ] 1They contribute very little or nothing. [ ] 2
4. Compared with other villages/neighborhoods, to what extent do people of this village/neighborhood contribute time and money toward common development goals?
They contribute less than other villages/ neighborhoods. [ ] 1They contribute about the same as other villages/neighborhoods. [ ] 2They contribute more than other villages/neighborhoods. [ ] 3
5. Are the relationships among people in this village/neighborhood generally harmonious or disagreeable?
Harmonious [ ] 1Disagreeable [ ] 2
6. Compared with other villages/neighborhoods, are the relationships among people in this village/neighborhood more harmonious, the same, or less harmonious than other villages/neighborhoods?
More harmonious [ ] 1The same [ ] 2Less harmonious [ ] 3
7. Suppose two people in this village/neighborhood had a fairly serious dispute with each other. Who do you think would primarily help resolve the dispute?
No one; people work it out between themselves [ ] 1Family/household members [ ] 2Neighbors [ ] 3Community leaders [ ] 4Religious leaders [ ] 5Judicial leaders [ ] 6Other (specify) [ ] 7