ACUHO-I C onstruction and R enovation D ata: T he ''N ext G eneration '' S urvey Jim Grimm, Past President of ACUHO-I Cynthia Parish Balogh, Senior Associate,

ACUHO-IACUHO-ICConstruction and onstruction and RRenovation enovation

DData: ata:

TThe he ''N''Next ext GGenerationeneration'''' SSurveyurveyJim Grimm, Past President of ACUHO-ICynthia Parish Balogh, Senior Associate, MGT

Ray Thompson, Partner, MGTKimberly Hardy, Senior Analyst, MGT

June 21, 2004

Jim Grimm’s VideoJim Grimm’s Video

History of the Survey

ACUHO-I and MGT Collaboration

Project Goal and ObjectivesEstablish a national data set that is

reliable and useful for institutional planning

• To provide information that CHOs want and need• To create a user-friendly electronic survey• To produce an easily accessible report

IntroductionIntroduction

Share results from the study of 284 colleges and universities

Obtain feedback for fine-tuning the survey and the process prior to Fall 2005 administration

Purpose of PresentationPurpose of Presentation

PProcess for rocess for

AAdministering the dministering the

SSurveyurvey

Develop Online Format for Survey

Pilot Test with Expanded Research Advisory Group - 42 Institutions

Analyze Pilot Test Data and Report at ACUHO-I Conference and on Web site

Revise Survey Instrument and Process Feedback from Pilot Study Participants

Feedback from ACUHO-I Conference

Study ProcessStudy Process

Administer Survey to All ACUHO-I Member Institutions in Fall 2003 Initial E-mail to CHOs with Link to

Survey and Unique Password

Reminder E-mail

Analyze Survey Data and Report at 2004 ACUHO-I Conference

Produce Final Report for Web site

Administer SurveyAdminister Survey

SSurvey urvey IInstrumentnstrument

Section A: Institutional Characteristics Institutional Type, Size, Control

Housing Capacity and Program Information

Section B: Facilities Planning Initiatives Projects During Relevant Time Period

Projects Planned Within Next Five Years

Existence of Campus/Housing Master Plans

Survey ItemsSurvey Items

Section C: New Construction Projects Types and Numbers of Units/Beds

Gross Square Footage

Cost Figures• Project and Construction Costs

• Per SF and Per Bed Costs Calculated

Types of Space and Amenities

Reasons for New Construction

Methods of Funding

Survey Items Survey Items (cont.)(cont.)

Section D: Renovation Projects Extent of Renovation

Types and Numbers of Units/Beds

Gross Square Footage

Cost Figures• Project and Construction Costs

• Per SF and Per Bed Costs Calculated

Types of Space and Amenities

Reasons for Renovation

Methods of Funding


Section E: Survey Feedback Length of Time to Complete Survey

Assistance from Other Departments

Feedback on Questions

Other Comments

Unit/Floor Plans and Photos New Construction - Plans and Photos

Renovation - Before/After Plans


SStudytudy R Resultsesults

284 Respondents ~ 30% Response Rate

97% 4-Year, 3% 2-Year Institutions

59% Public, 40% Private, <1% Other

Representative of Institutional and Housing Program Size

RespondentsRespondents

Institutional Enrollment by On-Institutional Enrollment by On-Campus Housing CapacityCampus Housing Capacity

Construction or renovation Construction or renovation completed from Fall 2001 through completed from Fall 2001 through

Fall 2003?Fall 2003?

New Construction

Only18.1%

Renovation Only

36.8%

Both New Construction

and Renovation

20.2%None24.9%

Planning to initiate construction or Planning to initiate construction or renovation project in next 5 years?renovation project in next 5 years?

Undecided11.3%

None4.4%

New Construction

Only14.9%

Renovation Only

19.3%

Both New Construction

and Renovation

50.2%

Does your institution have a campus Does your institution have a campus master plan that includes housing?master plan that includes housing?

75.4%

24.6%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Yes No

Do you currently have a separate Do you currently have a separate housing master plan for your housing master plan for your

institution?institution?

52.2%47.8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Yes No

NNewew C Constructiononstruction FFindingsindings

88 Institutions Reporting113 New Construction Projects

What type of living units? What type of living units? (choose all (choose all that apply)that apply)

4.4%

23.0%

31.9%

20.4%

15.0%

8.8%

8.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Traditional Rooms

Modified TraditionalRooms

Adjoining Suites

Super Suites

Individual ContractApartments

Apartments

Other

Number of Projects by Percent of Units Number of Projects by Percent of Units Configured as Single Occupancy Configured as Single Occupancy

BedroomBedroom

12 11 11

4 5

47

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Number of Projects

0% 1% to20%

21% to40%

41% to60%

61% to80%

81% to100%

Percentage of units configured as single occupancy

Number of Projects by Percent of Units Number of Projects by Percent of Units Configured as Double Occupancy Configured as Double Occupancy

BedroomBedroom

42

74

8 8

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Number of Projects

0% 1% to20%

21% to40%

41% to60%

61% to80%

81% to100%

Percentage of units configured as double occupancy

Types of space and amenities in Types of space and amenities in facility?facility?

Laundry - 80.5%Staff office(s) - 77.9%Staff apartment(s) - 77.9%Lobby - 68.1%Elevator(s) - 68.1%Electronic security system - 66.4%Central lounge - 61.9%Vending area - 60.2%Reception office - 58.4%Kitchen(s) - 52.2%Television room - 49.6%Storage for institution

furniture/equipment - 46.9% Floor lounge(s) - 44.2%Recreation/Game room - 43.4%

Library/Study - 38.9%BBQ/Picnic area - 37.2%Computer lab - 33.6%Classroom(s) - 30.1%Faculty office(s) - 15.9%Storage for student belongings -

15.0%Exercise/Fitness room - 14.2%Cafeteria/Dining facility - 13.3%Volleyball court - 10.6%Faculty apartment(s) - 9.7%Snack bar - 9.7%Convenience store - 9.7%Swimming pool - 8.0%Basketball court - 7.1%Conference/Meeting Room - 3.5%

Types of amenities in unit?Types of amenities in unit?

Internet access - 92.9%Furniture - 91.2%Air conditioning - 80.5%Carpeting - 79.6%Stove - 64.6%Temperature control

in each living unit- 64.6%

Telephone Outlet - 64.6%

Refrigerator - 61.9%Cable TV service -

58.4%Washer/Dryer in

each living unit - 40.7%

Microwave - 38.9%Dishwasher - 31.9%

Panic button - 19.5%

Project CostsProject Costs - Adjoining Suite Style - Adjoining Suite Style FacilitiesFacilities

Project CostHigh: $43.0 million Low: $8.1 millionAverage: $17.7 million

Project Cost/GSFHigh: $226 Low: $108Average: $156

Project Cost/BedHigh: $66,882 Low: $29,809 Average: $43,076

Notes: Only includes projects that were strictly adjoining suite facilities not in combination with any other type of unit. Only includes projects that provided either Number of Beds or GSF, and either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Construction CostsConstruction Costs - Adjoining Suite Style - Adjoining Suite Style FacilitiesFacilities

Construction CostHigh: $40.0 million Low: $5.6 millionAverage: $15.8 million

Construction Cost/GSFHigh: $185 Low: $88 Average: $135

Construction Cost/BedHigh: $64,591Low: $24,403 Average: $39,143

Notes: Only includes projects that were strictly adjoining suite facilities not in combination with any other type of unit. Only includes projects that provided either Number of Beds or GSF, and either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Project CostsProject Costs - Super Suite Style - Super Suite Style FacilitiesFacilities

Project CostHigh: $38.0 million Low: $4.0 millionAverage: $23.6 million



Notes: Only includes projects that were strictly super suite facilities not in combination with any other type of unit. Only includes projects that provided either Number of Beds or GSF, and either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Construction CostsConstruction Costs - Super Suite Style - Super Suite Style FacilitiesFacilities

Construction CostHigh: $39.0 million Low: $4.2 millionAverage: $20.3 million


Construction Cost/BedHigh: $49,171Low: $23,733 Average: $42,757

Notes: Only includes projects that were strictly super suite facilities not in combination with any other type of unit. Only includes projects that provided either Number of Beds or GSF, and either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Project CostsProject Costs - Apartment Facilities - Apartment Facilities

Project CostHigh: $69.0 millionLow: $3.0 million Average: $24.4 million



Notes: Only includes projects that were strictly apartments and individual contract apartments (or a combination of the two) not in combination with any other type of unit. Only includes projects that provided either Number of Beds or GSF, and either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Construction CostsConstruction Costs - Apartment - Apartment FacilitiesFacilities

Construction CostHigh: $59.0 million Low: $3.4 million Average: $20.3 million

Construction Cost/GSFHigh: $419 Low: $40Average: $120

Construction Cost/BedHigh: $119,433 Low: $19,149 Average: $43,452

Notes: Only includes projects that were strictly apartments and individual contract apartments (or a combination of the two) not in combination with any other type of unit. Only includes projects that provided either Number of Beds or GSF, and either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Are you seeking or did you achieve Are you seeking or did you achieve LEED (Leadership in Energy and LEED (Leadership in Energy and

Environmental Design) Environmental Design) certification for this project?certification for this project?

Why was this facility built?Why was this facility built?

Choose All That Apply: Meet demand for additional beds (81%) Meet the needs and interests of students (81%) Increase the variety of housing options (63%) Increase percent of undergrads housed (53%)

Primary Reason: Meet demand for additional beds (48%)

What entity will own the new What entity will own the new facility?facility?

77.0%

5.3% 6.2% 7.1%4.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

College/University

InstitutionalFoundation

PrivateFoundation

PrivateDeveloper

Other

What entity will manage the new What entity will manage the new facility?facility?

89.4%

0.9% 4.4% 5.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

College/University

PrivateFoundation

PrivateDeveloper

Other PrivatePropertyManager

When a foundation owns the facility, When a foundation owns the facility, who manages it?who manages it?

70.0%

10.0%

20.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

College/University Private Foundation Private Developer

Method of funding for the project?Method of funding for the project? (choose all that apply)(choose all that apply)

5.3%

0.9%

4.4%

5.3%

5.3%

7.1%

9.7%

12.4%

70.8%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

Tax exempt revenue bonds

Reserve funds

Private developer financed

Donor

Taxable revenue bonds

Bank loan

Operating funds

State appropriations

Other

If debt financed, what entity is If debt financed, what entity is responsible for the debt?responsible for the debt?

Private Developer

12%

Other5%

Institutional Foundation

6%

College/ University

77%

RRenovationenovation F Findingsindings

98 Institutions Reporting221 Renovation Projects

72 Rehabilitation or Modified Rehabilitation

Extent of the renovation?Extent of the renovation? (all (all institutions)institutions)

20%

18%

28%

19%

14%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Rehabilitation

ModifiedRehabilitation

SystemRefurbishment

CosmeticRefurbishment

GeneralRefurbishment

Type of living unit?Type of living unit? (Rehab/Modified Rehab ~ choose all that apply)(Rehab/Modified Rehab ~ choose all that apply)

Project CostProject Cost Figures Figures (Rehab/Modified (Rehab/Modified Rehab)Rehab)

Project CostHigh: $22.0 millionLow: $24,000Average: $5.4 million

Project Cost/GSFHigh: $888 Low: $11 Average: $90

Project Cost/BedHigh: $109,375 Low: $198 Average: $18,560

Note: Only includes projects that provided either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Construction CostConstruction Cost Figures Figures (Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)

Construction CostHigh: $14.9 million Low: $24,000 Average: $4.6 million


Construction Cost/BedHigh: $91,500 Low: $119 Average: $14,267

Note: Only includes projects that provided either Project Cost or Construction Cost.

Why was this facility renovated? Why was this facility renovated? (Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)

Choose All That Apply: Update facilities (86%) Meet the needs and interests of students (74%) Accommodate academic or other special programs

(24%) Provide higher levels of privacy (19%)

Primary Reason: Update facilities (61%)

Method of funding for the project? Method of funding for the project? (Rehab/Modified Rehab ~ choose all that apply)(Rehab/Modified Rehab ~ choose all that apply)

4.2%

1.4%

1.4%

1.4%

4.2%

6.9%

22.2%

45.8%

48.6%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

Reserve funds

Tax exempt revenue bonds

Operating funds

Taxable revenue bonds

Debt

State appropriations

Donor

Private developer financed

Other

If debt financed, what entity is If debt financed, what entity is responsible responsible

for the debt? for the debt? (Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)

71.4%

2.9%

11.4%14.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

College/University

InstitutionalFoundation

PrivateDeveloper

Other

Were you able or do you plan to Were you able or do you plan to increase the rental rate for this increase the rental rate for this

facility? facility? (Rehab/Modified Rehab)(Rehab/Modified Rehab)

HHistorical istorical SSurvey urvey

CComparisonomparison

Historical Comparison:Historical Comparison:Average Construction Cost Per Average Construction Cost Per

Square FootSquare Foot

*This figure does not include two institutions, Clemson University and North Carolina State University.

Unit Type 1995 1999 2001 2004

Apartment $98.85 $85.00 $94.51 $120.09

Suite N/A $103.00 $152.29 $125.80

Renovations $78.50 $80.89 $55.78* $64.46

No. of Institutions 32 42 27 284

Historical Comparison:Historical Comparison:Average Construction Cost Per BedAverage Construction Cost Per Bed

*This figure does not include two institutions, Clemson University and North Carolina State University.

**This figure includes apartments and suites for 1995.

Unit Type 1995 1999 2001 2004

Apartment $22,573 ** $34,483 $32,179 $43,452

Suite $22,573 ** $32,314 $45,639 $40,991

Renovations $26,603 $23,908 $15,296* $14,267

No. of Institutions 32 42 27 284

DDiscussion and iscussion and

QQuestionsuestions

Data omitted for critical questions

Value of comprehensive questionnaire vs. time for completion

Other

DiscussionDiscussion

AAcknowledgementscknowledgements

Research Advisory GroupResearch Advisory Group

Randy Alexander - Iowa State University

Dallas Bauman - SUNY at Stony Brook

Patrick Bradley - Central Missouri State U.

Connie Carson - Wake Forest University

Jim Day - University of Georgia

Terry Durkin - Old Dominion University

Roger Fisher - Texas Christian University

Bob Huss - Oklahoma State University

Paul Jahr - Georgia College & State U.

Jeff Janz - U. of Wisconsin - Whitewater

Beth McCuskey - University of Wyoming

Rita Moser - Florida State University

Ron Sasse - Texas A&M University

Craig Schmitt - University of Dayton

Christine Smith - Elmhurst College

Ken Stoner - University of Kansas

Craig Thompson - Boise State University

Tim Tiemens - Sonoma State University

Jeff Urdahl - University of Southern California

Bill Zeller - University of Michigan

A Special Thank You to All Survey Participants!

Presenter Contact Information Presenter Contact Information

Kimberly Hardy, Ph.D.MGT of America, Inc.

(850) [email protected]

www.mgtamer.com

Ray Thompson, Ph.D.MGT of America, Inc.

(239) [email protected]

www.mgtamer.com

Jim Grimm(352) 332-6862

[email protected]

Cynthia Parish Balogh, Ph.D.

MGT of America, Inc.(850) 386-3191

[email protected]

www.mgtamer.com

ACUHO-I C onstruction and R enovation D ata: T he ''N ext G eneration '' S urvey Jim Grimm, Past President of ACUHO-I Cynthia Parish Balogh, Senior Associate,

Documents

survey slide

survey u acuho

u history

universities u

survey u pilot test

u section d

u section c

u section e