Action research Science or bullshit?
Dec 18, 2015
Action research
Science or bullshit?
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 2
Who am I?
Per Flensburg, Professor Växjö University
Started as mathematician, ended as humanist
Thesis about End User Computing
Doing research in cooperation with users and trade unions
Following “The scandinavian School” – at least one of them
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 3
Action research - what is it?
Helping weak part to help themselves
Doing free consultancy for weak parts
Research in cooperation with users
Empirical, qualitative research
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 4
Key concepts
Facilitator
Catalyst
Intervention
Change Process
Help to help yourself
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 5
Change process
Change in power, increased power to a weak group
Increased quality of working life
Self-steering groups
Either with trade unions or
Socio Technique with the employer
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 6
Facilitator & Catalyst
Shall not do anything herself, but encourage other to do things
Shall absolutely not make any decisions
Shall keep the change process going
Something between a teacher and headshrinker
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 7
Intervention
Will always cause a lot of turbulence both in the participating organisation and the researchers
Outcome is not possible to predict
Middle management often work against the change
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 8
Help to help yourself
Means working at a meta level
The facilitator should not do anything within the domain
Encourage without doing
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 9
Problems in AR
Choosing participants
Those who not participate
Middle management
Different opinions of the catalysts
Uncertainty of the outcome
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 10
Result of action research
Result describes in terms of a typical case.
In such a case every company should recognize itself in certain respects, but probably will no company recognize itself in all respects.
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 11
An example
A foundry in middle Sweden
The users constructed a production planning system based upon spread-sheets
The following is a collection of some presentations I made in the middle of the 90’s
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 12
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 13
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 14
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 15
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 16
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 17
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 18
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 19
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 20
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 21
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 22
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 23
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 24
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 25
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 26
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 27
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 28
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 29
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 30
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 31
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 32
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 33
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 34
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 35
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 36
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 37
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 38
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 39
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 40
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 41
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 42
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 43
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 44
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 45
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 46
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 47
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 48
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 49
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 50
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 51
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 52
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 53
What happenedThe production planning system was developed, but was never taken in use, since the users (=the project leader) did not trusted it.The report system was developed with help of an external user hired consult. It was taken in use and worked very well.The users continued making there own support applicationsThe IT-manager was fired
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 54
Traditional planning system
Paintings
Cutting edges
Snagging
Moulding
Core factory
Melting
Ordre
PIW
End storage
Core storage
Theintegratedplanningsystem Paintings
Cutting edges
Snagging
Moulding
Core factory
Melting
Pro
du
cti
on
ord
re
Pro
du
cti
on
rep
ort
May 2002 © Per Flensburg 55
Planning at the foundry
Core factory
Moulding
Melting
Snagging
Cutting edges
Core odre
Iron odre
Casting odre Customer odre